Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 164 references

Machine learning enhanced atom probe tomography analysis: a snapshot review

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review claims that machine learning can automate every major stage of atom probe tomography analysis, removing user bias and enabling FAIR-aligned workflows.

desk verdict A solid snapshot review of ML in atom probe tomography; the maturity claim is slightly ahead of the evidence, but the survey value stands. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14378 v1 pith:YFRVJCRK submitted 2025-04-19 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.LG

Yue Li , Ye Wei , Alaukik Saxena , Markus Kühbach , Christoph Freysoldt , Baptiste Gault This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scics.LG
keywords atomprobetomographymachinelearningpointclouddatamassspectrometrychemicalshort-rangeordermicrostructuresegmentationcrystallographicanalysisFAIR
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This snapshot review argues that machine learning has moved from isolated demonstrations to covering the entire atom probe tomography (APT) analysis workflow: mass-spectrum peak assignment, crystallographic orientation extraction, chemical short-range order detection, microstructural segmentation, and data management aligned with the FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable). The motivation is a documented problem: APT analysis relies heavily on individual user expertise, producing bias and interlaboratory inconsistency. The authors estimate that more than one million APT datasets have been collected, each containing millions to billions of ions, making manual analysis a bottleneck. The review's central assertion is that integrating ML into standardized workflows will reduce user dependency and improve reproducibility, accuracy, and data reuse, while also revealing structures such as sub-nanometer chemical short-range order that human analysts routinely miss.

What carries the argument

The central object is the APT dataset as a 3D point cloud, where each ion carries reconstructed x-y-z coordinates plus a mass-to-charge ratio, together with derived representations such as mass spectra, detector hit maps (field evaporation images), and spatial distribution maps that encode periodic lattice information along the depth direction. The argument is carried by ML architectures matched to these representations: decision trees for isotopic fingerprint classification, deep and convolutional neural networks for pole and zone-line recognition and for spatial distribution map classification, 3D convolutional and point-cloud networks for direct atomic-environment recognition, and unsupervised clustering in composition space for phase segmentation. The common thread is replacing manually chosen thresholds and user judgment with learned mappings trained largely on synthetic or simulated data.

What would settle it

The central claim would be weakened by a benchmark in which models trained on simulated spatial distribution maps are applied to experimental APT data from an instrument or material class not represented in training and perform at chance level, or by an interlaboratory round-robin showing that ML-assisted workflows reduce interlaboratory variance no more than manual analysis does.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes a structured map of machine-learning applications in APT and claims the field is approaching maturity. Supervised and self-supervised methods have been demonstrated for automated mass-spectrum identification using decision trees trained on isotopic fingerprints, for crystallographic analysis from detector hit maps using deep neural networks that read pole positions, for chemical ordering analysis using convolutional neural networks trained on simulated spatial distribution maps, and for microstructural segmentation using clustering in composition space, U-Net-based simplification, and skeletonization. The review's conclusion is that ML embedded in standardized workflows is the route to removing human bias, enabling quantitative comparisons across datasets, and making APT data compliant with FAIR principles.

Load-bearing premise

The review's case rests on the surveyed studies being a representative snapshot of the field and on ML models trained largely on simulated data generalizing to real experimental APT data across instruments and materials.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If ML-based peak ranging replaces manual ranging, composition measurements across laboratories should become more consistent and easier to audit.
  • Automated crystallographic analysis from detector hit maps could make orientation calibration routine, including for noisy datasets where Hough-transform methods fail.
  • CNN and point-cloud methods that detect chemical short-range order below roughly one nanometer would let APT probe ordering phenomena previously inaccessible, assuming training data coverage is adequate.
  • Unsupervised composition-space clustering combined with skeletonization could provide reproducible quantification of complex microstructures such as precipitates, grain boundaries, and dislocations across many datasets.
  • Embedding these tools in FAIR-aligned workflows and electronic lab notebooks would make APT datasets findable and reusable, enabling larger-scale data mining.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's own framing implies that the main bottleneck is no longer algorithm accuracy but the absence of standardized, shareable data formats and benchmark datasets; a community benchmark could test this directly.
  • Because many models are trained on simulated or synthetic data, a natural next step is active learning or domain adaptation that refines models on experimental data without requiring full labels.
  • If the ML-APT methods generalize as claimed, they could transfer to other point-cloud microscopies such as secondary ion mass spectrometry or electron tomography, where similar manual-threshold problems exist.
  • The review's emphasis on FAIR suggests that machine learning here may be as important for data governance as for analysis accuracy; a testable prediction is that ML-assisted workflows reduce interlaboratory variance in reported compositions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a snapshot review of machine learning (ML) applied to atom probe tomography (APT). It begins with a concise introduction to APT data acquisition and the conventional analysis workflow, then surveys relevant ML algorithms, and then organizes its main review around the stages of the APT analysis pipeline: mass spectrum analysis, crystallographic analysis, chemical ordering analysis, and detection/segmentation of microstructural features. A substantial section is devoted to standardization, FAIR data principles, electronic lab notebooks, and ontologies. The authors argue that ML offers a route to reduce user-dependent bias, improve reproducibility, and enable material discoveries beyond human capability, and they close with future directions such as interfacing with commercial platforms, data rectification, and ML-accelerated simulation. The paper is a review rather than a primary research contribution; its central claim is that ML methods have been successfully demonstrated across the APT workflow and that further integration will transform APT data analysis.

Significance. If its assessment is accepted, this review fills a genuine gap: it provides an accessible, structured map of a rapidly growing area that has not yet been comprehensively reviewed. The paper is well illustrated, technically informative for non-specialists, and commendably explicit about many per-method limitations, such as the prior-knowledge requirement of ML-APT (Sec. 3.3.2), the degraded performance of AtomNet on small CSROs (Sec. 3.3.3), and the columnar-grain restriction in Zhou et al.'s method (Sec. 3.4.1). It also connects ML development to the FAIR agenda, which is a useful and timely perspective. The main weakness is that the concluding interpretation, especially the statement that ML is 'driving advancements' and can be integrated into a standardized workflow, goes somewhat beyond the evidence base described in the body, where most tools are demonstrated on specific datasets, often trained on simulated or synthetic data, and without a shared benchmark for cross-instrument or cross-material generalization. This is a review of feasibility demonstrations rather than a validated general capability, and the conclusion should reflect that distinction.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 5 (Concluding remarks)] The concluding claim that 'ML is driving advancements in APT data interpretation' and that integrating ML into a standardized workflow presents a 'transformative opportunity' is stronger than the evidence assembled in Sections 3.1–3.4 supports. Several flagship methods are trained on simulated or synthetic data (ML-APX in Sec. 3.2, ML-APT in Sec. 3.3.2, and Zhou et al.'s CNN in Sec. 3.4.1), and the review does not quantify how these models transfer across instruments, reconstruction protocols, or material systems. The per-method limitations are honestly acknowledged, but the conclusion generalizes beyond those caveats. I recommend adding an explicit sentence stating that the current evidence base constitutes feasibility demonstrations on specific datasets and that benchmark-validated general capability remains an open goal.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1.1] The estimates 'over 120 APT setups' and 'at least one million APT datasets' are presented with citation [7], but it is not clear whether that reference actually contains this quantitative estimate; please either provide the derivation or cite a source that explicitly documents these numbers.
  2. [Section 2.2] The text describes clustering and dimensionality reduction as 'two of the most important self-supervised learning techniques,' but clustering is conventionally classified as unsupervised learning, while self-supervised learning typically refers to methods that derive supervision from the data itself (e.g., pretext tasks and autoencoders). Consider renaming the section 'Unsupervised and self-supervised learning' or adjusting the wording to avoid a misleading taxonomy for readers new to ML.
  3. [Section 3.3.3] The statement that AtomNet 'can display unseen structures not present in the training data, such as stacking faults' is surprising and would benefit from a mechanistic explanation, particularly because it is invoked to support the discovery-beyond-human-capability argument. What learned features or point-cloud descriptors allow the model to recognize a structure class that was absent from the training set?
  4. [Section 3.5.1] The FAIR and NOMAD/NeXus discussion is useful, but the review does not state which of the ML tools surveyed in Sections 3.1–3.4 currently output or consume these standardized formats. A sentence on this would make the workflow argument concrete rather than programmatic.
  5. [Abstract and Section 1.1] Minor language issues: in the abstract, 'make challenging standardization and the deployment of data analysis workflows that would be compliant with FAIR data principles' is awkward and should read 'make standardization and the deployment of FAIR-compliant data analysis workflows challenging'; in Section 1.1, 'an estimated of at least one million APT datasets' should be 'an estimated at least one million APT datasets' or 'an estimate of at least one million APT datasets.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: this is a literature review whose conclusions are qualitative and supported by independently published, externally validated ML-APT studies.

full rationale

The paper is a snapshot review, not a derivation or prediction exercise, so the standard circularity patterns (self-definitional fits, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, uniqueness theorems imported from authors) do not arise. Its central claim—that ML is advancing APT analysis and can reduce user bias—is a qualitative synthesis of published methods. The cited ML tools (ML-ToF, ML-APX, ML-APT, AtomNet, GB segmentation CNNs) are described with their own training data and experimental validations, and the authors' self-citations are to peer-reviewed, externally checkable papers rather than to an unverifiable assertion that alone forces the conclusion. The review also records limitations (e.g., AtomNet's weaker performance on smaller CSROs, voxelization limits, need for prior CSRO knowledge), which shows the surveyed claims are not definitionally guaranteed. The skeptic's point about synthetic-trained models generalizing to real data is a legitimate evidence-quality concern, but it is not a circularity: the review does not define success in terms of its own outputs, and no equation or fitted parameter is recycled as a prediction. The FAIR/ontology sections report infrastructure efforts and standards, with no claim derived from an input. Hence no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear because the paper is a review without new derivations. The axioms listed reflect the assumptions any survey relies on when it claims the field is moving in a certain direction.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Atom probe tomography point clouds faithfully represent atomic positions at near-atomic scale.
    The review's claims about ML extracting microstructural information assume APT data quality is sufficient. The authors acknowledge anisotropic resolution and detection efficiency, so this is an assumption with caveats.
  • domain assumption Machine learning models trained on synthetic or simulated data generalize to experimental APT data.
    Many methods reviewed, including ML-APT and ML-APX, train on simulated data. The review treats these as validated, without independent statistical testing.
  • ad hoc to paper The reviewed literature is representative of the broader ML-APT field.
    The snapshot review selects a subset of papers; if biased, its narrative could overstate maturity. The authors have a conflict of interest as creators of several methods.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Machine learning enhanced atom probe tomography analysis: a snapshot review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YFRVJCRK

@misc{pith2026250414378,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Machine learning enhanced atom probe tomography analysis: a snapshot review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YFRVJCRK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14378}
}
read the original abstract

Atom probe tomography (APT) is a burgeoning characterization technique that provides compositional mapping of materials in three-dimensions at near-atomic scale. Since its significant expansion in the past 30 years, we estimate that one million APT datasets have been collected, each containing millions to billions of individual ions. Their analysis and the extraction of microstructural information has largely relied upon individual users whose varied level of expertise causes clear and documented bias. Current practices hinder efficient data processing, and make challenging standardization and the deployment of data analysis workflows that would be compliant with FAIR data principles. Over the past decade, building upon the long-standing expertise of the APT community in the development of advanced data processing or data mining techniques, there has been a surge of novel machine learning (ML) approaches aiming for user-independence, and that are efficient, reproducible, and robust from a statistics perspective. Here, we provide a snapshot review of this rapidly evolving field. We begin with a brief introduction to APT and the nature of the APT data. This is followed by an overview of relevant ML algorithms and a comprehensive review of their applications to APT. We also discuss how ML can enable discoveries beyond human capability, offering new insights into the mechanisms within materials. Finally, we provide guidance for future directions in this domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

164 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Atomically resolved tomography to directly inform simulations for structure –property relationships

    Moody MP, Ceguerra AV, Breen AJ, Cui XY, Gault B, Stephenson LT, et al. Atomically resolved tomography to directly inform simulations for structure –property relationships. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5501

    2014

  2. [2]

    Atom probe microscopy: Springer; 2012

    Gault B, Moody MP, Cairney JM, Ringer SP. Atom probe microscopy: Springer; 2012

    2012

  3. [3]

    Atom probe tomography

    Gault B, Chiaramonti A, Cojocaru-Mirédin O, Stender P, Dubosq R, Freysoldt C, et al. Atom probe tomography. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2021;1:51

    2021

  4. [4]

    Processing APT Spectral Backgrounds for Improved Quantification

    Haley D, London AJ, Moody MP. Processing APT Spectral Backgrounds for Improved Quantification. Microsc Microanal. 2020;26:964-77

    2020

  5. [5]

    Convolutional neural network-assisted recognition of nanoscale L12 ordered structures in face -centred cubic alloys

    Li Y, Zhou X, Colnaghi T, Wei Y, Marek A, Li H, et al. Convolutional neural network-assisted recognition of nanoscale L12 ordered structures in face -centred cubic alloys. npj Comput Mater. 2021;7:8

    2021

  6. [6]

    Reflections on the spatial performance of atom probe tomography in the analysis of atomic neighbourhoods

    Gault B, Klaes B, Morgado FF, Freysoldt C, Li Y, De Geuser F, et al. Reflections on the spatial performance of atom probe tomography in the analysis of atomic neighbourhoods. Microsc Microanal. 2022;28:1116-26

    2022

  7. [7]

    Large -Scale Atom Probe Tomography Data Mining: Methods and Application to Inform Hydrogen Behavior

    Meier MS, Bagot PAJ, Moody MP, Haley D. Large -Scale Atom Probe Tomography Data Mining: Methods and Application to Inform Hydrogen Behavior. Microsc Microanal. 2023;29:879-89

    2023

  8. [8]

    Nanoscale mic rostructural analysis of metallic materials by atom probe field ion microscopy

    Hono K. Nanoscale mic rostructural analysis of metallic materials by atom probe field ion microscopy. Prog Mater Sci. 2002;47:621-729

    2002

Show all 164 references
  1. [9]

    Investigations of field evaporation with a field -desorption microscope

    Waugh A, Boyes E, Southon M. Investigations of field evaporation with a field -desorption microscope. Surf Sci. 1976;61:109-42

    1976

  2. [10]

    Design of a femtosecond laser assisted tomographic atom probe

    Gault B, Vurpillot F, Vella A, Gilbert M, Menand A, Blavette D, et al. Design of a femtosecond laser assisted tomographic atom probe. Rev Sci Instrum. 2006;77. 40

    2006

  3. [11]

    Wide-Field-of-View Atom Probe Reconstruction

    Geiser BP, Larson DJ, Oltman E, Gerstl S, Reinhard D, Kelly TF, et al. Wide-Field-of-View Atom Probe Reconstruction. Microsc Microanal. 2009;15:292-3

    2009

  4. [12]

    Reflections on the Projection of Ions in Atom Probe Tomography

    De Geuser F, Gault B. Reflections on the Projection of Ions in Atom Probe Tomography. Microsc Microanal. 2017;23:238-46

    2017

  5. [13]

    Atom probe tomography: p ut theory into practice: Academic Press; 2016

    Lefebvre W, Vurpillot F, Sauvage X. Atom probe tomography: p ut theory into practice: Academic Press; 2016

    2016

  6. [14]

    Three -dimensional nanoscale characterisation of materials by atom probe tomography

    Devaraj A, Perea DE, Liu J, Gordon LM, Prosa TJ, Parikh P, et al. Three -dimensional nanoscale characterisation of materials by atom probe tomography. Int Mater Rev. 2018;63:68 - 101

    2018

  7. [15]

    The local electrode atom probe: Springer; 2014

    Miller MK, Forbes RG, Miller MK, Forbes RG. The local electrode atom probe: Springer; 2014

    2014

  8. [16]

    Atom probe tomography

    Kelly TF, Miller MK. Atom probe tomography. Rev Sci Instrum. 2007;78

    2007

  9. [17]

    A brief overview of atom probe tomography research

    Gault B. A brief overview of atom probe tomography research. Appl Microsc. 2016;46:117 - 26

    2016

  10. [18]

    Roadmap on data-centric materials science

    Bauer S, Benner P, Bereau T, Blum V, Boley M, Carbogno C, et al. Roadmap on data-centric materials science. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2024;32:063301

    2024

  11. [19]

    Machine-learning- enhanced time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis

    Wei Y, Varanasi RS, Schwarz T, Gomell L, Zhao H, Larson DJ, et al. Machine-learning- enhanced time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis. Patterns. 2021:100192

    2021

  12. [20]

    Atom probe tomography analysis of the reference zircon gj -1: An interlaboratory study

    Exertier F, La Fontaine A, Corcoran C, Piazolo S, Belousova E, Peng Z, et al. Atom probe tomography analysis of the reference zircon gj -1: An interlaboratory study. Chem Geol. 2018;495:27-35

    2018

  13. [21]

    Promoting Standards in Quantitative Atom Probe Tomography Analysis

    Ulfig R, Kelly TF, Gault B. Promoting Standards in Quantitative Atom Probe Tomography Analysis. Microsc Microanal. 2009;15:260-1

    2009

  14. [22]

    Atom probe crystallography

    Gault B, Moody MP, Cairney JM, Ringer SP. Atom probe crystallography. Mater Today. 2012;15:378-86

    2012

  15. [23]

    Structural analyses in three ‐dimensional atom probe: a Fourier transform approach

    Vurpillot F, Da C osta G, Menand A, Blavette D. Structural analyses in three ‐dimensional atom probe: a Fourier transform approach. J Microsc. 2001;203:295-302

    2001

  16. [24]

    Crystallographic structural analysis in atom probe microscopy via 3D Hough transformation

    Yao L, Moody M, Cairney J, Haley D, Ceguerra A, Zhu C, et al. Crystallographic structural analysis in atom probe microscopy via 3D Hough transformation. Ultramicroscopy. 2011;111:458- 63

    2011

  17. [25]

    A new systematic framework for crystallographic analysis of atom probe data

    Araullo-Peters VJ, Breen A, Ceguerra AV, Gault B, Ringer SP, Cairney JM. A new systematic framework for crystallographic analysis of atom probe data. Ultramicroscopy. 2015;154:7-14

    2015

  18. [26]

    Influence of field evaporation on Radial Distribution Functions in Atom Probe Tomography

    Haley D, Petersen T, Barton G, Ringer SP. Influence of field evaporation on Radial Distribution Functions in Atom Probe Tomography. Philos Mag. 2009;89:925-43

    2009

  19. [27]

    Spatial Distribution M aps for Atom Probe Tomography

    Geiser BP, Kelly TF, Larson DJ, Schneir J, Roberts JP. Spatial Distribution M aps for Atom Probe Tomography. Microsc Microanal. 2007;13:437-47

    2007

  20. [28]

    Qualification of the tomographic reconstruction in atom probe by advanced spatial distribution map techniques

    Moody MP, Gault B, Stephenson LT, Haley D, Ringer SP. Qualification of the tomographic reconstruction in atom probe by advanced spatial distribution map techniques. Ultramicroscopy. 2009;109:815-24

    2009

  21. [29]

    Advances in the calibration of atom probe tomographic reconstruction

    Gault B, Moody MP, De Geuser F, Tsafnat G, La Fontaine A, Stephenson LT, et al. Advances in the calibration of atom probe tomographic reconstruction. J Appl Phys. 2009;105:034913

    2009

  22. [30]

    Estimation of the Reconstruction Parameters for Atom Probe Tomography

    Gault B, Geuser F, Stephenson L, Moody M, Muddle B, Ringer S. Estimation of the Reconstruction Parameters for Atom Probe Tomography. Microsc Microanal. 2008;14:296-305

    2008

  23. [31]

    Chromium- based bcc-superalloys strengthened by iron supplements

    Ma K, Blackburn T, Magnussen JP, Kerbstadt M, Ferreirós PA, Pinomaa T, et al. Chromium- based bcc-superalloys strengthened by iron supplements. Acta Mater. 2023;257:119183. 41

    2023

  24. [32]

    Atom probe microscopy investigation of Mg site occupancy within δ′ precipitates in an Al –Mg–Li alloy

    Gault B, Cui XY, Moody MP, De Geuser F, Sigli C, Ringer SP, et al. Atom probe microscopy investigation of Mg site occupancy within δ′ precipitates in an Al –Mg–Li alloy. Scripta Mater. 2012;66:903-6

    2012

  25. [33]

    Ageing response and strengthening mechanisms in a new Al-Mn-Ni-Cu-Zr alloy designed for laser powder bed fusion

    Buttard M , Freixes ML, Josserond C, Donnadieu P, Chéhab B, Blandin J -J, et al. Ageing response and strengthening mechanisms in a new Al-Mn-Ni-Cu-Zr alloy designed for laser powder bed fusion. Acta Mater. 2023;259:119271

    2023

  26. [34]

    Segregation of solute elements at grain boundaries in an ultrafine grained Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy

    Sha G, Yao L, Liao X, Ringer SP, Chao Duan Z, Langdon TG. Segregation of solute elements at grain boundaries in an ultrafine grained Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Ultramicroscopy. 2011;111:500- 5

    2011

  27. [35]

    Clustering and nearest neighbour distances in atom -probe tomography

    Philippe T, De Geuser F, Duguay S, Lefebvre W, Cojocaru -Mirédin O, Da Costa G, et al. Clustering and nearest neighbour distances in atom -probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy. 2009;109:1304-9

    2009

  28. [36]

    Clustering in Age-Hardenable Aluminum Alloys

    Dumitraschkewitz P, Gerstl SSA, Stephenson LT, Uggowitzer PJ, Pogatscher S. Clustering in Age-Hardenable Aluminum Alloys. Adv Eng Mater. 2018;20:1800255

    2018

  29. [37]

    Applications of atom -probe tomography to the characterisation of solute behaviours

    Marquis EA, Hyde JM. Applications of atom -probe tomography to the characterisation of solute behaviours. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2010;69:37-62

    2010

  30. [38]

    Direct observations of nucleation in a nondilute multicomponent alloy

    Sudbrack CK, Noebe RD, Seidman DN. Direct observations of nucleation in a nondilute multicomponent alloy. Phys Rev B. 2006;73:212101

    2006

  31. [39]

    Parameter free quantitative analysis of atom probe data by correlation functions: Application to the precipitation in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu

    Zhao H, Gault B, Ponge D, Raabe D, De Geuser F. Parameter free quantitative analysis of atom probe data by correlation functions: Application to the precipitation in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu. Scripta Mater. 2018;154:106-10

    2018

  32. [40]

    Direct comparison of Fe -Cr unmixing characterization by atom probe tomography and small angle scattering

    Couturier L, De Geuser F, Deschamps A. Direct comparison of Fe -Cr unmixing characterization by atom probe tomography and small angle scattering. Mater Charact. 2016;121:61-7

    2016

  33. [41]

    Analysis of three - dimensional atom-probe data by the proximity histogram

    Hellman OC, Vandenbroucke JA, Rüsing J, Isheim D, Seidman DN. Analysis of three - dimensional atom-probe data by the proximity histogram. Microsc Microanal. 2000;6:437-44

    2000

  34. [42]

    Quantitative atom probe analysis of nanostructure containing clusters and precipitates with multiple length scales

    Marceau RKW, Stephenson LT, Hutchinson CR, Ringer SP. Quantitative atom probe analysis of nanostructure containing clusters and precipitates with multiple length scales. Ultramicroscopy. 2011;111:738-42

    2011

  35. [43]

    Nearest neighbour diagnostic statistics on the accuracy of APT solute cluster characterisation

    Stephenson LT, Moody MP, Gault B, Ringer SP. Nearest neighbour diagnostic statistics on the accuracy of APT solute cluster characterisation. Philos Mag. 2013;93:975-89

    2013

  36. [44]

    A procedure to create isoconcentration surfaces in low-chemical-partitioning, high-solute alloys

    Hornbuckle BC, Kapoor M, Thompson GB. A procedure to create isoconcentration surfaces in low-chemical-partitioning, high-solute alloys. Ultramicroscopy. 2015;159:346-53

    2015

  37. [45]

    The spatial resolution of 3D atom probe in the investigation of single-phase materials

    Vurpillot F, Bostel A, Cadel E, Blavette D. The spatial resolution of 3D atom probe in the investigation of single-phase materials. Ultramicroscopy. 2000;84:213-24

    2000

  38. [46]

    Atom probe tomography investigation of heterogeneous short-range ordering in the ‘komplex’ phase state (K- state) of Fe–18Al (at.%)

    Marceau RKW, Ceguerra AV, Breen AJ, Palm M, Stein F, Ringer SP, et al. Atom probe tomography investigation of heterogeneous short-range ordering in the ‘komplex’ phase state (K- state) of Fe–18Al (at.%). Intermetallics. 2015;64:23-31

    2015

  39. [47]

    Atom Probe Tomography Interlaboratory Study on Clusterin g Analysis in Experimental Data Using the Maximum Separation Distance Approach

    Dong Y, Etienne A, Frolov A, Fedotova S, Fujii K, Fukuya K, et al. Atom Probe Tomography Interlaboratory Study on Clusterin g Analysis in Experimental Data Using the Maximum Separation Distance Approach. Microsc Microanal. 2019;25:356-66

    2019

  40. [48]

    Guided mass spectrum labelling in atom probe tomography

    Haley D, Choi P, Raabe D. Guided mass spectrum labelling in atom probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy. 2015;159:338-45

    2015

  41. [49]

    Deep learning for 3d point clouds: A survey

    Guo Y, Wang H, Hu Q, Liu H, Liu L, Bennamoun M. Deep learning for 3d point clouds: A survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2020;43:4338-64. 42

    2020

  42. [50]

    Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects

    Jordan MI, Mitchell TM. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science. 2015;349:255-60

    2015

  43. [51]

    Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm: A Review of Classification Techniques

    Saraswat P. Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm: A Review of Classification Techniques. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 477-82

    2022

  44. [52]

    Top 10 algorithms in data mining

    Wu X, Kumar V, Ross Quinlan J, Ghosh J, Yang Q, Motoda H, et al. Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl Inf Syst. 2008;14:1-37

    2008

  45. [53]

    Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning

    Gilpin LH, Bau D, Yuan BZ, Bajwa A, Specter M, Kagal L. Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning. 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA): IEEE; 2018. p. 80-9

    2018

  46. [54]

    LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree

    Ke G, Meng Q, Finley T, Wang T, Chen W, Ma W, et al. LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach, California, USA: Curran Associates Inc.; 2017. p. 3149–57

    2017

  47. [55]

    Learning representations by back-propagating errors

    Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature. 1986;323:533-6

    1986

  48. [56]

    Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks

    Hornik K. Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw. 1991;4:251-7

    1991

  49. [57]

    Unsupervised learning: foundations of neural computation: MIT press; 1999

    Hinton G, Sejnowski TJ. Unsupervised learning: foundations of neural computation: MIT press; 1999

    1999

  50. [58]

    A review of clustering techniques and developments

    Saxena A, Prasad M, Gupta A, Bharill N, Patel OP, Tiwari A, et al. A review of clustering techniques and developments. Neurocomputing. 2017;267:664-81

    2017

  51. [59]

    Applied dynamic programming: Princeton university press; 2015

    Bellman RE, Dreyfus SE. Applied dynamic programming: Princeton university press; 2015

    2015

  52. [60]

    Dimensionality reduction: A comparative review

    Van Der Maaten L, Postma EO, Van Den Herik HJ. Dimensionality reduction: A comparative review. J Mach Learn Res. 2009;10:13

    2009

  53. [61]

    Machine learning assisted crystallographic reconstruction from atom probe tomographic images

    Pu J-M, Chen S, Zhang T-Y. Machine learning assisted crystallographic reconstruction from atom probe tomographic images. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2024;37:035901

    2024

  54. [62]

    Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation

    Qi CR, Su H, Mo K, Guibas LJ. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition2017. p. 652-60

  55. [63]

    Harris 3D: a robust extension of the Harris operator for interest point detection on 3D meshes

    Sipiran I, Bustos B. Harris 3D: a robust extension of the Harris operator for interest point detection on 3D meshes. Vis Comput. 2011;27:963-76

    2011

  56. [64]

    A pulsed mass spectrometer with time dispersion

    Wolff M, Stephens W. A pulsed mass spectrometer with time dispersion. Rev Sci Instrum. 1953;24:616-7

    1953

  57. [65]

    Colloquium: 100 years of mass spectrometry: Perspectives and future trends

    Maher S, Jjunju FP, Taylor S. Colloquium: 100 years of mass spectrometry: Perspectives and future trends. Rev Mod Phys. 2015;87:113-35

    2015

  58. [66]

    Proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry and the unambiguous real-time detection of 2, 4, 6 trinitrotoluene

    Sulzer P, Pete rsson F, Agarwal B, Becker KH, J ürschik S, M ärk TD, et al. Proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry and the unambiguous real-time detection of 2, 4, 6 trinitrotoluene. Anal Chem. 2012;84:4161-6

    2012

  59. [67]

    diradical

    Pedersen S, Herek J, Zewail A. The validity of the" diradical" hypothesis: direct femtoscond studies of the transition-state structures. Science. 1994;266:1359-64

    1994

  60. [68]

    Strain- induced asymmetric line segregation at faceted S i grain boundaries

    Liebscher CH, Stoffers A, Alam M, Lymperakis L, Cojocaru-Mirédin O, Gault B, et al. Strain- induced asymmetric line segregation at faceted S i grain boundaries. Phys Rev Lett. 2018;121:015702

    2018

  61. [69]

    Principal component analysis of TOF-SIMS images of organic monolayers

    Biesinger MC, Paepegaey P -Y, McIntyre NS, Harbottle RR, Petersen NO. Principal component analysis of TOF-SIMS images of organic monolayers. Anal Chem. 2002;74:5711-6. 43

    2002

  62. [70]

    Spatial and spectral correlations in MALDI mass spectrometry images by clustering and multivariate analysis

    McCombie G, Staab D, Stoeck li M, Knochenmuss R. Spatial and spectral correlations in MALDI mass spectrometry images by clustering and multivariate analysis. Anal Chem. 2005;77:6118-24

    2005

  63. [71]

    An unsupervised MVA method to compare specific regions in human breast tumor tissue samples using ToF-SIMS

    Bluestein BM, Morrish F, Graham DJ, Guenthoer J, Hockenbery D, Porter PL, et al. An unsupervised MVA method to compare specific regions in human breast tumor tissue samples using ToF-SIMS. Analyst. 2016;141:1947-57

    2016

  64. [72]

    Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry

    Verbeeck N, Caprioli RM, Van de Plas R. Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2020;39:245-91

    2020

  65. [73]

    Enhancing element identification by expectation–maximization method in atom probe tomography

    Vurpillot F, Hatzoglou C, Radiguet B, Da Costa G, Delaroche F, Danoix F. Enhancing element identification by expectation–maximization method in atom probe tomography. Microsc Microanal. 2019;25:367-77

    2019

  66. [74]

    Bayesian approach to automatic mass -spectrum peak identification in atom probe tomography

    Mikhalychev A, Vlasenko S, Payne T, Reinhard D, Ulyanenkov A. Bayesian approach to automatic mass -spectrum peak identification in atom probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy. 2020;215:113014

    2020

  67. [75]

    Investigations of field evaporation wit h a field - desorption microscope

    Waugh AR, Boyes ED, Southon MJ. Investigations of field evaporation wit h a field - desorption microscope. Surf Sci. 1976;61:109-42

    1976

  68. [76]

    Modeling Atom Probe Tomography: A review

    Vurpillot F, Oberdorfer C. Modeling Atom Probe Tomography: A review. Ultramicroscopy. 2015;159:202-16

    2015

  69. [77]

    A full -scale simulation approach for atom probe tomography

    Oberdorfer C, Eich SM, Schmitz G. A full -scale simulation approach for atom probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy. 2013;128:55-67

    2013

  70. [78]

    Revealing latent pole and zone line information in atom probe detector maps using crystallographically correlated metrics

    Breen AJ, Day AC, Lim B, Davids WJ, Ringer SP. Revealing latent pole and zone line information in atom probe detector maps using crystallographically correlated metrics. Ultramicroscopy. 2023;243:113640

    2023

  71. [79]

    Automatic analysis of electron backscatter diffraction patterns

    Wright SI, Adams BL. Automatic analysis of electron backscatter diffraction patterns. Metall Trans A. 1992;23:759-67

    1992

  72. [80]

    Orientation imaging: The emergence of a new microscopy

    Adams BL, Wright SI, Kunze K. Orientation imaging: The emergence of a new microscopy. Metall Trans A. 1993;24:819-31

    1993

  73. [81]

    Machine -learning-based atom probe crystallographic analysis

    Wei Y, Gault B, Varanasi RS, Raabe D, Herbig M, Breen AJ. Machine -learning-based atom probe crystallographic analysis. Ultramicroscopy. 2018;194:15-24

    2018

  74. [82]

    Quantitative three -dimensional imaging of chemical sho rt-range order via machine learning enhanced atom probe tomography

    Li Y, Wei Y, Wang Z, Liu X, Colnaghi T, Han L, et al. Quantitative three -dimensional imaging of chemical sho rt-range order via machine learning enhanced atom probe tomography. Nat Commun. 2023;14:7410

    2023

  75. [83]

    Short -range ordering and its effects on mechanical properties of high-entropy alloys

    Wu Y, Zhang F, Yuan X, Huang H, Wen X, Wang Y, et al. Short -range ordering and its effects on mechanical properties of high-entropy alloys. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;62:214-20

    2021

  76. [84]

    Chemical medium -range order in a medium-entropy alloy

    Wang J, Jiang P, Yuan F, Wu X. Chemical medium -range order in a medium-entropy alloy. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1021

    2022

  77. [85]

    Short-range order and its impact on the CrCoNi medium-entropy alloy

    Zhang R, Zhao S, Ding J, Chong Y, Jia T, Ophus C, et al. Short-range order and its impact on the CrCoNi medium-entropy alloy. Nature. 2020;581:283-7

    2020

  78. [86]

    The formation of ordered clusters in Ti–7Al and Ti–6Al–4V

    Radecka A, Bagot P, Martin T, Coakley J, Vorontsov V, Moody M, et al. The formation of ordered clusters in Ti–7Al and Ti–6Al–4V. Acta Mater. 2016;112:141-9

    2016

  79. [87]

    Direct imaging of short - range order and its impact on deformation in Ti-6Al

    Zhang R, Zhao S, Ophus C, Deng Y, Vachhani SJ, Ozdol B, et al. Direct imaging of short - range order and its impact on deformation in Ti-6Al. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaax2799

    2019

  80. [88]

    Insights into microstructural interfaces in aerospace alloys characterised b y atom probe tomography

    Martin TL, Radecka A, Sun L, Simm T, Dye D, Perkins K, et al. Insights into microstructural interfaces in aerospace alloys characterised b y atom probe tomography. Mater Sci Technol. 2016;32:232-41. 44

    2016

  81. [89]

    A procedure for quantification of precipitate microstructures from three-dimensional atom probe data

    Vaumousse D, Cerezo A, Warren PJ. A procedure for quantification of precipitate microstructures from three-dimensional atom probe data. Ultramicroscopy. 2003;95:215-21

    2003

  82. [90]

    New Techniques for the Analysis of Fine-Scaled Clustering Phenomena within Atom Probe Tomography (APT) Data

    Stephenson LT, Moody MP, Liddicoat PV, Ringer SP. New Techniques for the Analysis of Fine-Scaled Clustering Phenomena within Atom Probe Tomography (APT) Data. Microsc Microanal. 2007;13:448-63

    2007

  83. [91]

    Hierarchical density -based cluster analysis frame work for atom probe tomography data

    Ghamarian I, Marquis EA. Hierarchical density -based cluster analysis frame work for atom probe tomography data. Ultramicroscopy. 2019;200:28-38

    2019

  84. [92]

    The Application of the OPTICS Algorithm to Cluster Analysis in Atom Probe Tomography Data

    Wang J, Schreiber DK, Bailey N, Hosemann P, Toloczko MB. The Application of the OPTICS Algorithm to Cluster Analysis in Atom Probe Tomography Data. Microsc Microanal. 2019;25:338-48

    2019

  85. [93]

    Detecting Clusters in Atom Probe Data with Gaussian Mixture Models

    Zelenty J, Dahl A, Hyde J, Smith GDW, Moody MP. Detecting Clusters in Atom Probe Data with Gaussian Mixture Models. Microsc Microanal. 2017;23:269-78

    2017

  86. [94]

    Structural analyses in three -dimensional atom probe: a Fourier transform approach

    Vurpillot F, Da Costa G, Menand A, Blavette D. Structural analyses in three -dimensional atom probe: a Fourier transform approach. J Microsc. 2001;203:295-302

    2001

  87. [95]

    Quantitative chemical - structure evaluation using atom probe tomography: Short -range order analysis of Fe –Al

    Marceau RKW, Ceguerra AV, Breen AJ, Raabe D, Ringer SP. Quantitative chemical - structure evaluation using atom probe tomography: Short -range order analysis of Fe –Al. Ultramicroscopy. 2015;157:12-20

    2015

  88. [96]

    Quantifying short -range order using atom probe tomography

    He M, Davids WJ, Breen AJ, Ringer SP. Quantifying short -range order using atom probe tomography. Nat Mater. 2024

    2024

  89. [97]

    Short -range order in multicomponent materials

    Ceguerra AV, Moody MP, Powles RC, Petersen TC, Marceau RK, Ringer SP. Short -range order in multicomponent materials. Acta Crystallogr Sect A: Found Crystallogr. 2012;68:547-60

    2012

  90. [98]

    Unraveling the origin of local chemical ordering in Fe-based solid-solutions

    Yan K, Xu Y, Niu J, Wu Y, Li Y, Gault B, et al. Unraveling the origin of local chemical ordering in Fe-based solid-solutions. Acta Mater. 2024;264:119583

    2024

  91. [99]

    Machine Learning -Enabled Tomographic Imaging of Chemical Short-Range Atomic Ordering

    Li Y, Colnaghi T, Gong Y, Zhang H , Yu Y, Wei Y, et al. Machine Learning -Enabled Tomographic Imaging of Chemical Short-Range Atomic Ordering. Adv Mater. 2024;36:2407564

    2024

  92. [100]

    Direct recognition of crystal structures via three-dimensional convolutional neural networks with high accuracy and tolerance to random displacements and missing atoms

    Rao Z, Li Y, Zhang H, Colnaghi T, Marek A, Rampp M, et al. Direct recognition of crystal structures via three-dimensional convolutional neural networks with high accuracy and tolerance to random displacements and missing atoms. Scripta Mater. 2023;234:115542

    2023

  93. [101]

    3D deep learning for enhanced atom probe tomography analysis of nanoscale microstructures

    Yu J, Wang Z, Saksena A, Wei S, Wei Y, Colnaghi T, et al. 3D deep learning for enhanced atom probe tomography analysis of nanoscale microstructures. Acta Mater. 2024;278:120280

    2024

  94. [102]

    Applying computational geometry techniques for advanced feature analysis in atom probe data

    Felfer P, Ceguerra A, Ringer S, Cairney J. Applying computational geometry techniques for advanced feature analysis in atom probe data. Ultramicroscopy. 2013;132:100-6

    2013

  95. [103]

    An Automated Computational Approach for Complete In-Plane Compositional Interface Analysis by Atom Probe Tomography

    P eng Z, Lu Y, Hatzoglou C, Kwiatkowski da Silva A, Vurpillot F, Ponge D, et al. An Automated Computational Approach for Complete In-Plane Compositional Interface Analysis by Atom Probe Tomography. Microsc Microanal. 2019;25:389-400

    2019

  96. [104]

    3D nanostructural characterisation of grain boundaries in atom probe data utilising machine learning methods

    Wei Y, Peng Z, Küh bach M, Breen A, Legros M, Larranaga M, et al. 3D nanostructural characterisation of grain boundaries in atom probe data utilising machine learning methods. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0225041

    2019

  97. [105]

    Revealing in-plane grain boundary composition features through machine learning from atom probe tomography data

    Zhou X, Wei Y, Kühbach M, Zhao H, Vogel F, Kamachali RD, et al. Revealing in-plane grain boundary composition features through machine learning from atom probe tomography data. Acta Mater. 2022;226:117633

    2022

  98. [106]

    Mapping interfacial excess in atom probe data

    Felfer P, Scherrer B, Demeulemeester J, Vandervorst W, Cairney JM. Mapping interfacial excess in atom probe data. Ultramicroscopy. 2015;159:438-44

    2015

  99. [107]

    A Machine Learning Framework for Quantifying Chemical Segregation and Microstructural Features in Atom Probe Tomography Data

    Saxena A, Polin N, Kusampudi N, Katnagallu S, Molina -Luna L, Gutfleisch O, et al. A Machine Learning Framework for Quantifying Chemical Segregation and Microstructural Features in Atom Probe Tomography Data. Microsc Microanal. 2023;29:1658-70. 45

    2023

  100. [108]

    Phase Segmentation in Atom -Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning -Based Edge Detection

    Madireddy S, Chung D-W, Loeffler T, Sankaranarayanan SKRS, Seidman DN, Balaprakash P, et al. Phase Segmentation in Atom -Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning -Based Edge Detection. Sci Rep. 2019;9:20140

    2019

  101. [109]

    U -Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation

    Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U -Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 234-41

    2015

  102. [110]

    Morphological classification of dense objects in atom probe tomography data

    Ghamarian I, Yu LJ, Marquis EA. Morphological classification of dense objects in atom probe tomography data. Ultramicroscopy. 2020;215:112996

    2020

  103. [111]

    Analyzing Linear Features in Atom Probe Tomography Datasets using Skeletonization

    Saxena A, Kühbach M, Katnagallu S, Kontis P, Gault B, Freysoldt C. Analyzing Linear Features in Atom Probe Tomography Datasets using Skeletonization. Microsc Microanal. 2024;30

    2024

  104. [112]

    Mean Curvature Skeletons

    Tagliasacchi A, Alhashim I, Olson M, Zhang H. Mean Curvature Skeletons. Computer Graphics Forum. 2012;31:1735-44

    2012

  105. [113]

    Cost -benefit analysis for FAIR research data : cost of not having FAIR research data: Publications Office; 2018

    Services ECaPE. Cost -benefit analysis for FAIR research data : cost of not having FAIR research data: Publications Office; 2018

    2018

  106. [114]

    COMPL -AI Framework: A Technical Interpretation and LLM Benchmarking Suite for the EU Artificial Intelligence Act

    Guldimann P, Spiridonov A, Staab R, Jovanović N, Vero M, Vechev V, et al. COMPL -AI Framework: A Technical Interpretation and LLM Benchmarking Suite for the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. arXiv preprint arXiv:241007959. 2024

    2024

  107. [115]

    The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

    Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleto n G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3:1-9

    2016

  108. [116]

    FAIR Principles: Interpretations and Implementation Considerations

    Jacobsen A, de Miranda Azevedo R, Juty N, Batista D, Coles S, Cornet R, et al. FAIR Principles: Interpretations and Implementation Considerations. Data Intell. 2020;2:10–29

    2020

  109. [117]

    Introducing the FAIR Principles for research software

    Barker M, Chue Hong NP, Katz DS, Lamprecht A-L, Martinez-Ortiz C, Psomopoulos F, et al. Introducing the FAIR Principles for research software. Sci Data. 2022;9:622

    2022

  110. [118]

    FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspective

    Huerta EA, Blaiszik B, Brinson LC, Bouchard KE, Diaz D, Doglioni C, et al. FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspective. Sci Data. 2023;10:487

    2023

  111. [119]

    FAIR Computational Workflows

    Goble C, Cohen -Boulakia S, Soiland -Reyes S, Garijo D, Gil Y, Crusoe MR, et al. FAIR Computational Workflows. Data Intell. 2020;2:108–21

    2020

  112. [120]

    The FAIR Cookbook - the essential resource for and by FAIR doers

    Rocca -Serra P, Gu W, Ioannidis V, Abbassi -Daloii T, Capella -Gutierrez S, Chandramouliswaran I, et al. The FAIR Cookbook - the essential resource for and by FAIR doers. Sci Data. 2023;10:292

    2023

  113. [121]

    AiiDA 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenance

    Huber SP, Zo upanos S, Uhrin M, Talirz L, Kahle L, Häuselmann R, et al. AiiDA 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenance. Sci Data. 2020;7:300

    2020

  114. [122]

    pyiron: An integrated development environment for computational materials science

    Janssen J, Surendralal S, Lysogorskiy Y, Todorova M, Hickel T, Drautz R, et al. pyiron: An integrated development environment for computational materials science. Comput Mater Sci. 2019;163:24–36

    2019

  115. [123]

    WorkflowHub: a registry for computational workflows

    Gustafsson OJR, Wilkinson SR, Bacall F, Pireddu L, Soiland -Reyes S, Leo S, et al. WorkflowHub: a registry for computational workflows. arXiv preprint arXiv:241006941. 2024

    2024

  116. [124]

    Kühbach M, Rielli VV, Primig S, Saxena A, Mayweg D, Jenkins B, et al. On Strong-Scaling and Open -Source Tools for High -Throughput Quantification of Material Point Cloud Data: Composition Gradients, Microstructural Object Reconstruction, and Spatial Correlations. arXiv prepri...

    2022 arXiv

  117. [125]

    On strong -scaling and open- source tools for analyzing atom probe tomography data

    Kühbach M, Bajaj P, Zhao H, Çelik MH, Jägle EA, Gault B. On strong -scaling and open- source tools for analyzing atom probe tomography data. npj Comput Mater. 2021;7:21

    2021

  118. [126]

    NFDI - Matwerk IUC 09: Infrastructure interfaces with condensed matter physics (collaboration with FAIRmat)

    Kühbach M, Menon S, Saxena A, Forti M, Kružíková P, Hammerschmidt T, et al. NFDI - Matwerk IUC 09: Infrastructure interfaces with condensed matter physics (collaboration with FAIRmat). Zenodo. 2024:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12594062. 46

    2024 doi

  119. [127]

    Proposed XML ‐based three ‐dimensional atom probe data standard

    Miller MK. Proposed XML ‐based three ‐dimensional atom probe data standard. Surf Interface Anal. 2004;36:601–5

    2004

  120. [128]

    Optimisation of mass ranging fo r atom probe microanalysis and application to the corrosion processes in Zr alloys

    Hudson D, Smith GDW, Gault B. Optimisation of mass ranging fo r atom probe microanalysis and application to the corrosion processes in Zr alloys. Ultramicroscopy. 2011;111:480-6

    2011

  121. [129]

    Ceguerra A, Liddicoat P, Apperley M, Ringer S, Goscinski W. Atom Probe Workbench version 1.0.0: An Australian cloud-based platform for the computational analysis of data from an Atom Probe Microscope (APM), used for chemical and 3D structural materials characterisation at the ...

    2014

  122. [130]

    An Open -Access Atom Probe To mography Mass Spectrum Database

    Diercks DR, Gorman BP, Gerstl SSA. An Open -Access Atom Probe To mography Mass Spectrum Database. Microsc Microanal. 2017;23:664–5

    2017

  123. [131]

    A MATLAB Toolbox for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable Atom Probe Data Science

    Heller M, Ott B, Dalbauer V, Felfer P. A MATLAB Toolbox for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable Atom Probe Data Science. Microsc Microanal. 2024

    2024

  124. [132]

    FAIR data enabling new horizons for materials research

    Scheffler M, Aesc hlimann M, Albrecht M, Bereau T, Bungartz H -J, Felser C, et al. FAIR data enabling new horizons for materials research. Nature. 2022;604:635–42

    2022

  125. [133]

    nexus-definitions

    Brockhauser S, Dobener F, Emminger C, Ginzburg L, Hildebrandt R, Mozumder R, et al. nexus-definitions. 2024

    2024

  126. [134]

    NeXus: A common format for the exchange of neutron and synchroton data

    Klosowski P, Koennecke M, Tischler JZ, Osborn R. NeXus: A common format for the exchange of neutron and synchroton data. Phys B: Condens Matter. 1997;241–243:151–3

    1997

  127. [135]

    The NeXus International Advisory Board Committee

    Committee TNIAB. The NeXus International Advisory Board Committee. NeXus. 2024

    2024

  128. [136]

    Towards establishing best practice in the analysis of hydrogen and deuterium by atom probe tomography

    Gault B, Gong Y -W, Saksena AK, Saksena A, Sauvage X, Bagot PAJ, et al. Towards establishing best practice in the analysis of hydrogen and deuterium by atom probe tomography. Microsc Microanal. 2024;30:1205–20

    2024

  129. [137]

    pynxtools-apm

    Kühbach M, Brockhauser S, Dob ener F, Mozumder R, Pielsticker L, Shabih S, et al. pynxtools-apm. 2024

    2024

  130. [138]

    NOMAD: A distributed web-based platform for managing materials science research data

    Scheidgen M, Himanen L, Ladines AN, Sikter D, Nakhaee M, Fekete Á, et al. NOMAD: A distributed web-based platform for managing materials science research data. J Open Source Softw. 2023;8:5388

    2023

  131. [139]

    openBIS ELN-LIMS: an open-source database for academic laboratories

    Barillari C, Ottoz DSM, Fuentes -Serna JM, Ramakrishnan C, Rinn B, Rudolf F. openBIS ELN-LIMS: an open-source database for academic laboratories. Bioinformatics. 2015;32:638–40

    2015

  132. [140]

    An infrastructure with user -centered presentation data model for integrated management of materials data and services

    Liu S, Su Y, Yin H, Zhang D, He J, Huang H, et al. An infrastructure with user -centered presentation data model for integrated management of materials data and services. npj Comput Mater. 2021;7:1–8

    2021

  133. [141]

    Strategies for accelerating the adoption of materials informatics

    Ward L, Aykol M, Blaiszik B, Foster I, Meredig B, Saal J, et al. Strategies for accelerating the adoption of materials informatics. MRS Bull. 2018;43:683–9

    2018

  134. [142]

    Considerations for implementing electronic laboratory notebooks in an academic research environment

    Higgins SG, Nogiwa-Valdez AA, Stevens MM. Considerations for implementing electronic laboratory notebooks in an academic research environment. Nat Protoc. 2022;17:179–89

    2022

  135. [143]

    Spatia lly correlated electron microscopy and atom probe tomography: Current possibilities and future perspectives

    Herbig M. Spatia lly correlated electron microscopy and atom probe tomography: Current possibilities and future perspectives. Scripta Mater. 2018;148:98-105

    2018

  136. [144]

    Modern Focused-Ion-Beam-Based Site-Specific Specimen Preparation for Atom Probe Tomography

    Prosa TJ, Larson DJ. Modern Focused-Ion-Beam-Based Site-Specific Specimen Preparation for Atom Probe Tomography. Microsc Microanal. 2017;23:194-209

    2017

  137. [145]

    Correlating atom probe tomography with x -ray and electron spectroscopies to understand microstructure –activity relationships in electrocatalysts

    Gault B, Schweinar K, Zhang S, Lahn L, Scheu C, Kim S -H, et al. Correlating atom probe tomography with x -ray and electron spectroscopies to understand microstructure –activity relationships in electrocatalysts. MRS Bull. 2022;47:718-26. 47

    2022

  138. [146]

    Community-Driven Methods for Open and Reproducible Software Tools for Analyzing Datasets from Atom Probe Microscopy

    Kühbach M, London AJ, Wang J, Schreiber DK, Mendez Martin F, Ghamarian I, et al. Community-Driven Methods for Open and Reproducible Software Tools for Analyzing Datasets from Atom Probe Microscopy. Microsc Microanal. 2022;28:1038–53

    2022

  139. [147]

    The NOMAD Artificial -Intelligence Toolkit: turning materials -science data into knowledge and understanding

    Sbailò L, Fekete Á, Ghiringhelli LM, Scheffler M. The NOMAD Artificial -Intelligence Toolkit: turning materials -science data into knowledge and understanding. npj Comput Mater. 2022;8:1–7

    2022

  140. [148]

    Ontology

    Gruber T. Ontology. In: Liu L, ÖZsu MT, editor s. Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2009. p. 1963-5

    2009

  141. [149]

    ISO 18115-1:2023(en) Surface chemical analysis — Vocabulary — Part 1: General terms and terms used in spectroscopy. 2023

    2023

  142. [150]

    The Intersection Between Semantic Web and Materials Science

    Valdestilhas A, Bayerlein B, Moreno Torres B, Zia GAJ, Muth T. The Intersection Between Semantic Web and Materials Science. Adv Intell Syst. 2023;5:2300051

    2023

  143. [151]

    Performance Evaluation of Upper‐Level Ontologies in Developing Materials Science Ontologies and Knowledge Graphs

    Beygi Nasrabadi H, Norouzi E, Sack H, Skrotzki B. Performance Evaluation of Upper‐Level Ontologies in Developing Materials Science Ontologies and Knowledge Graphs. Adv Eng Mater. 2024:2401534

    2024

  144. [152]

    PMD Core Ontology: Achieving semantic interoperability in materials science

    Bayerlein B, Schilling M, Birkholz H, Jung M, Waitelonis J, Mädler L, et al. PMD Core Ontology: Achieving semantic interoperability in materials science. Mater Des. 2024;237:112603

    2024

  145. [153]

    Atomic-Scale Analytical Tomography†

    Kelly TF. Atomic-Scale Analytical Tomography†. Microsc Microanal. 2017;23:34-45

    2017

  146. [154]

    A method for reconstructing and locating atoms on the crystal lattice in three-dimensional atom probe data

    Camus PP, Larson DJ, Kelly TF. A method for reconstructing and locating atoms on the crystal lattice in three-dimensional atom probe data. Appl Surf Sci. 1995;87:305-10

    1995

  147. [155]

    A new step towards the lattice reconstruction in 3DAP

    Vurpillot F, Renaud L, Blavette D. A new step towards the lattice reconstruction in 3DAP. Ultramicroscopy. 2003;95:223-9

    2003

  148. [156]

    Lattice rectification in atom probe tomography: Toward true three -dimensional atomic microscopy

    Moody MP, Gault B, Stephenson LT, Marceau RK, Powles RC, Ceguerra AV, et al. Lattice rectification in atom probe tomography: Toward true three -dimensional atomic microscopy. Microsc Microanal. 2011;17:226-39

    2011

  149. [157]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Ho J, Jain A, Abbeel P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems. Virtual2020. p. 6840-51

  150. [158]

    Generating 3D images of material microstructures from a single 2D image: a denoising diffusion approach

    Phan J, Sarmad M, Ruspini L, Kiss G, Lindseth F. Generating 3D images of material microstructures from a single 2D image: a denoising diffusion approach. Sci Rep. 2024;14:6498

    2024

  151. [159]

    Bayesian Diffusion Models for 3D Shape Reconstruction

    Xu H, Lei Y, Chen Z, Zhang X, Zhao Y, Wang Y, et al. Bayesian Diffusion Models for 3D Shape Reconstruction. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition2024. p. 10628-38

  152. [160]

    Deep learning STEM -EDX tomography of nanocrystals

    Han Y, Jang J, Cha E, Lee J, Chung H, Jeong M, et al. Deep learning STEM -EDX tomography of nanocrystals. Nat Mach Intell. 2021;3:267-74

    2021

  153. [161]

    Ab initio simulation of field evaporation

    Qi J, Oberdorfer C, Windl W, Marquis EA. Ab initio simulation of field evaporation. Phys Rev Mater. 2022;6:093602

    2022

  154. [162]

    Origin of enhanced zone l ines in field evaporation maps

    Qi J, Oberdorfer C, Marquis EA, Windl W. Origin of enhanced zone l ines in field evaporation maps. Scripta Mater. 2023;230:115406

    2023

  155. [163]

    Digital Twin: Generalization, characterization and implementation

    VanDerHorn E, Mahadevan S. Digital Twin: Generalization, characterization and implementation. Decis Support Syst. 2021;145:113524

    2021

  156. [164]

    Digitally twinned additive manufacturing: Detecting flaws in laser powder bed fusion by combining thermal simulations with in-situ meltpool sensor data

    Yavari R, Riensche A, Tekerek E, Jacquemetton L, Halliday H, Vandever M, et al. Digitally twinned additive manufacturing: Detecting flaws in laser powder bed fusion by combining thermal simulations with in-situ meltpool sensor data. Mater Des. 2021;211:110167. 48 Supplementary...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.