Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 23 references

Bolometric Superconducting Optical Nanoscopy (BOSON)

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read BOSON, a superconducting transition-edge nanoscope, achieves near-field imaging of phonon polaritons at ~50 nW excitation — four orders of magnitude lower than standard near-field nanoscopy.

desk verdict A genuinely new near-field detector concept with a plausible but not yet fully pinned-down bolometric mechanism; the 50 nW polariton imaging is worth taking seriously and deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14547 v1 pith:SBVD3WJH submitted 2025-04-20 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

Ran Jing , Boyi Zhou , Dingchen Kang , Wenjun Zheng , Zijian Zhou , Heng Wang , Xinzhong Chen , Juntao Yao
show 15 more authors
Bing Cheng Ji-Hoon Park Lukas Wehmeier Zhenbing Dai Shoujing Chen Christopher D. Prainito G. L. Carr Ilya Charaev Denis Bandurin Genda Gu Qiang Li Karl. K. Berggren D. N. Basov Xu Du Mengkun Liu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hall PACS 07.79.Fc85.25.Pb74.25.F
keywords transition-edgesensorsbolometricphotocurrentnear-fieldopticalnanoscopyphononpolaritonshexagonalboronnitrideniobiumnanobridgescanningprobemicroscopysuperconductingdetectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces BOSON, a near-field optical nanoscope whose detector is a superconducting niobium nanobridge operated at its transition edge, where a small temperature change produces a large resistance change. The central claim is that this bolometric readout can map photoinduced changes in superconductivity at the nanoscale and detect infrared polaritons at excitation powers around 50 nW, at least four orders of magnitude lower than conventional near-field microscopy requires. That claim is supported by imaging hyperbolic phonon polaritons in hexagonal boron nitride, by mapping local transition-edge temperatures in Nb weak-link bridges and FeTe$_{1-x}$Se$_x$ flakes, and by showing the response is tunable with temperature, bias current, and magnetic field. A reader should care because near-field optical probing normally needs milliwatt-scale light that heats and perturbs the very low-temperature states under study; a detector that works at nanowatt levels could open cryogenic quantum materials to nano-optical imaging and, the authors argue, points toward single-polariton detection.

What carries the argument

The central object is an on-chip superconducting transition-edge sensor: a 200-250 nm-wide, 50 nm-thick niobium nanobridge weak link integrated under the tip of a scattering-type near-field microscope and biased near its resistive transition. The identity carrying the argument is the bolometric response $\delta I \approx I_{\mathrm{bias}}(dR/dT)|_T \Delta T_{\mathrm{local}}$, with the local temperature rise $\Delta T_{\mathrm{local}}$ produced by the tip-launched polariton field and its interference with far-field and Nb-edge fields; the spatial resolution perpendicular to the bridge is set by the bridge width, and sub-micron quasiparticle diffusion explains why the detected region extends beyond the 20 nm tip apex. In the polariton geometry, the hBN flake on top of the Nb bridge supports hyperbolic phonon polaritons, and the Nb edges act as strong thermal absorbers that read out the polariton wave fronts.

What would settle it

Park the tip over the Nb bridge at a temperature and bias where $dR/dT$ is zero but photoexcitation still perturbs the superfluid (for example, far below $T_c$): any persistent near-field photocurrent fringe would disprove the purely bolometric model; alternatively, an identical normal-metal constriction should exhibit no transition-edge response, so comparable polariton fringes there would rule out the superconducting bolometric mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a superconducting weak-link nanobridge operated at the superconducting transition edge can serve as the detector in a scanning near-field microscope, transducing tip-launched electromagnetic fields into a near-field photocurrent sensitive enough to image hyperbolic phonon polaritons in hBN at $\sim$50 nW. The photocurrent is interpreted as bolometric: $I_{\mathrm{NFPC}} \propto I_{\mathrm{bias}}(dR/dT)\Delta T_{\mathrm{local}}$, where the tip-enhanced field, the far-field illumination, and the strongly enhanced field at the Nb edges interfere and create a standing-wave heating pattern whose spacing equals the polariton wavelength. The measured fringe wavelengths, 268 nm and 231 nm on the thicker and thinner hBN regions, match hyperbolic phonon polariton modes screened by the metallic Nb substrate. The same measurement maps the local transition-edge temperature, exposing weak-link suppression, junction defects, and, in FeTe$_{1-x}$Se$_x$, spatial $T_c$ inhomogeneity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the near-field photocurrent is purely bolometric - the signal equals $I_{\mathrm{bias}}(dR/dT)\Delta T_{\mathrm{local}}$ - supported only by qualitative agreement between the far-field photocurrent and $dR/dT$; if direct tip scattering, far-field leakage, or photovoltaic effects contribute significantly, the polariton fringes and transition-edge maps would not faithfully represent local thermal response.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • BOSON can map local transition-edge temperatures in superconducting devices, revealing nanoscale inhomogeneities such as weak-link suppression and defects in Nb bridges and spatial $T_c$ variation in FeTe$_{1-x}$Se$_x$ flakes.
  • Polariton imaging at ~50 nW, four orders of magnitude below typical near-field nanoscopy, means the technique can operate with low-fluence sources such as globars or synchrotron light and with greatly reduced sample and tip heating.
  • With narrower optimized bridges (down to ~50 nm) and voltage-bias (negative-feedback) readout, the authors expect sensitivity improvements by orders of magnitude, moving toward single-photon and single-polariton detection.
  • Because the superconducting transition edge is field-tunable, BOSON provides magnetic-field-dependent maps of transition-edge shifts, demonstrated on both Nb and FeTe$_{1-x}$Se$_x$.
  • The platform is anticipated to extend to THz frequencies and to studies of other weak bosonic excitations, including Cooper-pair dynamics and quasiparticle behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the bolometric interpretation is correct, the fringe visibility can be converted into an absolute local temperature excursion through the independently measured $dR/dT$, turning BOSON into a quantitative nanoscale calorimeter.
  • Beyond the paper: the same weak-link architecture should detect any excitation that thermalizes within the sub-micron diffusion length - plasmons, magnons, or individual phonons - making it a general transducer for nanoscale dissipation rather than a polariton-specific tool.
  • Beyond the paper: a control experiment on an identical normal-metal constriction, not reported here, would cleanly separate the purely bolometric channel from photothermoelectric or photovoltaic contributions.
  • Beyond the paper: the observed sign-switching and left-right asymmetry under strong illumination suggest BOSON can map the local nonlinear resistance landscape $R(T,I)$ of the constriction, effectively yielding nanoscale current-voltage characterization of superconducting devices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports the development of BOSON (BOlometric Superconducting Optical Nanoscopy), in which a superconducting Nb weak-link nanobridge biased near its transition edge acts as an on-chip bolometer scanned under a tip-based near-field microscope. The authors report three classes of results: (1) far-field and near-field photocurrent measurements on Nb nanobridges, with the far-field photocurrent following the temperature derivative of the resistance and the near-field signal reversing sign with bias and vanishing at zero bias; (2) areal mapping of the local transition-edge temperature of a Nb nanobridge and of an FeTe1-xSex flake using temperature- and magnetic-field-dependent NFPC images; and (3) simultaneous BOSON/s-SNOM imaging of hyperbolic phonon polaritons in hBN, including a polariton fringe pattern recorded at ~50 nW incident power and extracted fringe wavelengths (268 nm and 231 nm in the two flake regions) that are compared with a screened-hBN dispersion model (computed 230 nm for a 50 nm flake on Nb). SI Section 8 presents a model in which tip-launched polaritons interfere with far-field and Nb-edge fields, producing a thermal profile that is converted into a photocurrent.

Significance. Taken at face value, BOSON would be a significant new capability: it couples the well-developed sensitivity of superconducting transition-edge detection to scanning near-field microscopy and provides an optical readout that does not rely on far-field scattering. The paper contains several genuinely strong elements: the polariton-wavelength comparison is anchored to an independent dispersion calculation (231 nm measured versus 230 nm computed for a 50 nm flake on a metallic substrate), the fringe spacing scales with hBN thickness as expected, the sign reversal of the NFPC with bias and the null result at zero bias are the correct qualitative signatures of a bolometric response, and the supplementary material gives a complete account of fabrication, calibration, magnetic-field dependence, and a simulation of the proposed mechanism. The FTS and field-dependent measurements also demonstrate that the technique can produce spatially resolved transition-edge maps.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Fig. 3(d)] The central claim that BOSON achieves polariton imaging at ~50 nW of incident power is not backed by a noise-floor measurement, a blocked-laser or tip-retracted baseline, or error bars on the extracted fringe wavelengths (268 and 231 nm). The inset in Fig. 3(d) documents that the s-SNOM channel fails at this power, but it does not quantify the signal-to-noise ratio of the NFPC channel; without a stated noise floor, the 'at least four orders of magnitude' sensitivity comparison to previous near-field work cannot be independently assessed. I recommend reporting the NFPC noise floor (or a noise-equivalent-power estimate) for the same acquisition parameters used in Fig. 3(d) and giving the uncertainty on the fringe-wavelength extraction.
  2. [§3, Fig. 3(a); SI §8] The text states on the one hand that 'the PC signal detected using BOSON originates solely from tip-launched polaritons reaching the Nb nanobridge' and on the other that the mechanism is only 'potential,' while SI §8 itself notes that a significant photocurrent is generated when the tip parks outside the hBN flake. These statements are hard to reconcile, and the paper does not provide a control that isolates the polariton-mediated thermal channel: no measurement is reported at a frequency outside the hBN Reststrahlen band, nor on an identical device without hBN. Such a control is a direct falsification test of the proposed mechanism, since the polariton fringe contrast is predicted to disappear when no polariton mode exists while tip-modulated absorptive backgrounds would persist. I also recommend explicitly separating the background thermal contribution (tip parked on Nb) from the polariton-induced fringe contrast in the analysis.
  3. [SI §8, Fig. S8] The simulation supporting the polariton-thermal mechanism assumes a thermalization length l_D = 0.5 µm, and the text notes that the spatial resolution is effectively set by the bridge width (250 nm), both of which are comparable to or larger than the measured fringe periods (231–268 nm). Yet the model is claimed to produce a photocurrent pattern that 'replicates the intrinsic polariton wavelength λ_t.' Because a diffusive/thermal kernel of this width would be expected to attenuate and possibly shift spatial frequencies at the measured wavevectors, the authors should provide a transfer-function analysis (or a sensitivity study over l_D and bridge width) demonstrating that the apparent fringe wavelengths are not biased by the detector response, or state the extracted λ values as model-dependent. This matters because the 231/268 nm values are the quantitative connection between the measurement and the independent dispersion calculation.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract; §3] The phrase 'unprecedented spatial resolution and photon sensitivity' overstates the demonstrated resolution, which the paper itself states is set by the 250 nm bridge width and the sub-micron thermalization length; I recommend rewording to emphasize the photon-sensitivity advance and to state the resolution limit explicitly.
  2. [Fig. 3(b,c) caption] The phrase 'with 100 µW and ~1 µW incident power, respectively' is ambiguous about which power applies to the BOSON and s-SNOM panels; please clarify.
  3. [SI §4] The temperature calibration uses an ad hoc two-anchor power law because the raw thermometer reading is unreliable below 10 K; please state the estimated systematic uncertainty of the calibrated temperatures, since the functional form has two fitted parameters and only two anchors and propagates into quantitative statements such as the 7.79 K peak in Fig. 2.
  4. [SI §8] Please state explicitly which simulation parameters (l0, l_D, bridge width) are covered by the statement that the parameters 'do not significantly impact the simulation result,' and show the result of varying l0 and l_D so that the claim that the detected pattern replicates the intrinsic polariton wavelength can be checked.
  5. [§3, comparison to prior work] The 'at least four orders of magnitude lower' claim should name the specific baseline power used in the cited s-SNOM and photocurrent-nanoscopy experiments, since the paper's own s-SNOM channel operates at ~1 µW and an apples-to-apples baseline is needed.
  6. [SI §1] Please state for each NFPC map which demodulation harmonic (Ω or 2Ω) was used, and confirm that the same harmonic was used for the 50 nW image in Fig. 3(d).
  7. [SI §5] The claim that the technique resolves phase inhomogeneities at a length scale 'much smaller than previous studies using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy' is not quantified; please provide the characteristic length scale obtained from the FTS transition-edge maps.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

BOSON's polariton wavelengths are measured against independent hBN dispersion theory; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, so no circularity found.

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental platform and does not derive its headline phenomena from fitted parameters. The polariton wavelengths (268 nm and 231 nm) are extracted directly from NFPC images in Fig. 3(b-d) and compared with an independent hBN polariton dispersion calculation and with simultaneously recorded s-SNOM images, so the wavelength is not an input to the measurement. The bolometric assumption NFPC proportional to I_bias*dR/dT*Delta_T_local is tested against far-field photocurrent following dR/dT in Fig. 1(b), and the transition-edge map is calibrated using transport T_c anchors measured in a separate dilution fridge; the fitted calibration constants (alpha=1.398, Delta=5.224 K) only set the temperature axis and do not construct the spatial contrast. The SI simulation in Section 8 uses assumed values l0=3 um, l_D=0.5 um, and zero phase offset, but the paper explicitly states that these parameters do not significantly impact the simulation result, and the fringe period is set by the independently computed polariton wavevector rather than by a fit to the image. Citations to prior work with overlapping authors (e.g., Refs. 1, 2, 28, 34) describe the home-built microscope and established hBN phonon-polariton physics; these are externally supported results and are not used as a uniqueness argument or to forbid alternative mechanisms. Overall, no step in the claimed derivation chain reduces by construction to its own input. The main caveats, such as the absence of a control outside the hBN Reststrahlen band and the lack of a noise-floor baseline for the 50 nW image, are validation gaps and correctness risks rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on several assumed physical mechanisms: bolometric photocurrent generation, tip field enhancement, thermal spreading, and the polariton interference model in the simulation. The temperature calibration adds two fitted parameters. No new physical entities are introduced. The most consequential assumption is the bolometric origin of the near-field signal, which is not independently verified.

free parameters (5)
  • Temperature calibration exponent alpha = 1.398
    Fitted to two anchor points (bulk Nb Tc 8.5 K and thin Nb Tc 6.7 K) in SI section 4 via T_sample = (T_raw^alpha + Delta^alpha)^(1/alpha).
  • Temperature calibration offset Delta = 5.224 K
    Same calibration fit as alpha in SI section 4; accounts for sample stage thermal offset.
  • Thermalization length l_D = 0.5 µm
    Assumed in the SI section 8 simulation to smear the polariton heating profile; not measured or fitted.
  • Polariton damping length l_0 = 3 µm
    Assumed in the SI section 8 simulation; authors state it does not significantly affect the result.
  • Phase offset between far-field and polariton field = 0
    Assumed in the SI section 8 simulation; stated not to significantly impact the result.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The near-field photocurrent signal is bolometric: NFPC ~ I_bias * dR/dT * Delta_T_local.
    Used throughout to interpret the images; supported only by qualitative agreement of FFPC with dR/dT in Fig. 1(b), not by a direct local temperature measurement.
  • domain assumption The AFM tip enhances the incident field via the lightning-rod effect with an effective apex radius of about 20 nm, and local heating spreads over a micron-scale quasiparticle diffusion or thermal length.
    Standard s-SNOM assumption stated in the main text (Fig. 1(c) discussion); the quantitative spread is assumed, not measured.
  • ad hoc to paper The sample temperature follows T_sample = (T_raw^alpha + Delta^alpha)^(1/alpha) with alpha and Delta fitted to two anchor points.
    SI section 4; a heuristic calibration not derived from a thermal model of the cryostat.
  • domain assumption Hyperbolic phonon polaritons in hBN have wavelengths that scale linearly with flake thickness and are screened by the metallic Nb substrate.
    SI section 2; based on established hyperbolic dispersion theory, but the specific Nb-screened values (230 nm at 1492 cm^-1) are not independently verified in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The BOSON polariton signal arises from interference between tip-launched polaritons, far-field illumination, and Nb-edge fields, converted into a thermal profile and then into photocurrent.
    SI section 8; a simplified simulation with assumed l_D, l_0, and phase offset, used to argue that the PC pattern replicates the intrinsic polariton wavelength.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bolometric Superconducting Optical Nanoscopy (BOSON)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SBVD3WJH

@misc{pith2026250414547,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bolometric Superconducting Optical Nanoscopy (BOSON)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SBVD3WJH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14547}
}
read the original abstract

Superconducting transition-edge sensors are renowned for their extraordinary photon sensitivity and energy resolution, finding applications spanning quantum information, astronomy, and nanophotonics. Here, we report the development of BOlometric Superconducting Optical Nanoscopy (BOSON), a novel platform that integrates bolometric detection at the superconducting transition edges with near-field optical techniques. BOSON enables the mapping of photoinduced changes in superconductivity with unprecedented spatial resolution and photon sensitivity. By incorporating BOSON with low-dimensional materials, we achieved polariton imaging at nanowatt excitation levels--at least four orders of magnitude lower than the power typically required in prior near-field nanoscopy experiments. Our findings highlight the potential for BOSON to advance scanning probe based optical platforms to enable the detection of photons, polaritons, and Cooper pair dynamics at the nanoscale. This paves the way for quantum sensing applications using single-polariton detection and can offer deeper insights into quasiparticle dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14547 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental setup and measurement concept of BOSON. (a) Schematic of the experimental configuration, demonstrating the layered structure of the SC and the near-field photocurrent (PC) characterization. CP: Cooper Pair. (b) DC and far-field photocurrent (FFPC) characterization of an 8.5 µm wide, 50 nm thick Nb bridge device with an incident beam at 1555 cm-1 and 100 µW. (c) Near-field bolometric photocurrent detecti… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Infrared nano-imaging of Dirac magnetoexcitons in graphene,

    M. Dapolito, M. Tsuneto, W. Zheng, L. Wehmeier, S. Xu, X. Chen, J. Sun, Z. Du, Y . Shao, R. Jing and others, "Infrared nano-imaging of Dirac magnetoexcitons in graphene," Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 18, p. 1409–1415, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Landau-phonon polaritons in Dirac heterostructures,

    L. Wehmeier, S. Xu, R. A. Mayer, B. Vermilyea, M. Tsuneto, M. Dapolito, R. Pu, Z. Du, X. Chen, W. Zheng and others, "Landau-phonon polaritons in Dirac heterostructures," Science Advances, vol. 10, p. eadp3487, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Sub-diffractional volume- confined polaritons in the natural hyperbolic material hexagonal boron nitride,

    J. D. Caldwell, A. V . Kretinin, Y . Chen, V . Giannini, M. M. Fogler, Y . Francescato, C. T. Ellis, J. G. Tischler, C. R. Woods, A. J. Giles and others, "Sub-diffractional volume- confined polaritons in the natural hyperbolic material hexagonal boron nitride," Nature communications, vol. 5, p. 5221, 2014

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Tunable phonon polaritons in atomically thin van der Waals crystals of boron nitride,

    S. Dai, Z. Fei, Q. Ma, A. S. Rodin, M. Wagner, A. S. McLeod, M. K. Liu, W. Gannett, W. Regan, K. Watanabe and others, "Tunable phonon polaritons in atomically thin van der Waals crystals of boron nitride," Science, vol. 343, p. 1125–1129, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Cleaning interfaces in layered materials heterostructures,

    D. G. Purdie, N. M. Pugno, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. C. Ferrari and A. Lombardo, "Cleaning interfaces in layered materials heterostructures," Nature communications, vol. 9, p. 5387, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Anisotropic superconducting properties of single-crystalline FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5,

    M. Bendele, S. Weyeneth, R. Puzniak, A. Maisuradze, E. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, V . Pomjakushin, H. Luetkens, S. Katrych, A. Wisniewski and others, "Anisotropic superconducting properties of single-crystalline FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5," Physical Review B— Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 81, p. 224520, 2010

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Films of iron chalcogenide superconductors,

    Q. Li, W. Si and I. K. Dimitrov, "Films of iron chalcogenide superconductors," Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 74, p. 124510, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Growth conditions, structure and superconductivity of pure and metal-doped FeTe1- xSex single crystals,

    D. J. Gawryluk, J. Fink-Finowicki, A. Wiśniewski, R. Puźniak, V . Domukhovski, R. Diduszko, M. Kozłowski and M. Berkowski, "Growth conditions, structure and superconductivity of pure and metal-doped FeTe1- xSex single crystals," Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 24, p. 065011, 2011

    work page 2011

Show all 23 references
  1. [9]

    Direct observation of nodes and twofold symmetry in FeSe superconductor,

    C.-L. Song, Y .-L. Wang, P. Cheng, Y .-P. Jiang, W. Li, T. Zhang, Z. Li, K. He, L. Wang, J.-F. Jia and others, "Direct observation of nodes and twofold symmetry in FeSe superconductor," Science, vol. 332, p. 1410–1413, 2011

    2011

  2. [10]

    Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors,

    P. Dai, "Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 87, p. 855–896, 2015

    2015

  3. [11]

    Orbital Ingredients and Persistent Dirac Surface State for the Topological Band Structure in FeTe 0.55 Se 0.45,

    Y.-F. Li, S.-D. Chen, M. Garcı́a-Dı́ez, M. I. Iraola, H. Pfau, Y .-L. Zhu, Z.-Q. Mao, T. Chen, M. Yi, P.-C. Dai and others, "Orbital Ingredients and Persistent Dirac Surface State for the Topological Band Structure in FeTe 0.55 Se 0.45," Physical Review X, vol. 14, p. 021043, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Spectroscopic evidence for topological band structure in FeTe \_ {0.55} Se \_ {0.45},

    Y.-F. Li, S.-D. Chen, M. Garcia-Diez, M. I. Iraola, H. Pfau, Y .-L. Zhu, Z.-Q. Mao, T. Chen, M. Yi, P.-C. Dai and others, "Spectroscopic evidence for topological band structure in FeTe \_ {0.55} Se \_ {0.45}," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03861, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Topology meets time-reversal symmetry breaking in FeSe1- xTex superconductor,

    M. Roppongi, Y . Cai, K. Ogawa, S. Liu, G. Q. Zhao, M. Oudah, T. Fujii, K. Imamura, S. Fang, K. Ishihara and others, "Topology meets time-reversal symmetry breaking in FeSe1- xTex superconductor," 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Topological orders competing for the Dirac surface state in FeSeTe surfaces,

    X. Wu, S. B. Chung, C. Liu and E.-A. Kim, "Topological orders competing for the Dirac surface state in FeSeTe surfaces," Physical Review Research, vol. 3, p. 013066, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    High-temperature superconductivity in iron-based materials,

    J. Paglione and R. L. Greene, "High-temperature superconductivity in iron-based materials," Nature physics, vol. 6, p. 645–658, 2010

    2010

  8. [16]

    Electronic properties of the bulk and surface states of Fe1+ y Te1- x Se x,

    Y . Li, N. Zaki, V . O. Garlea, A. T. Savici, D. Fobes, Z. Xu, F. Camino, C. Petrovic, G. Gu, P. D. Johnson and others, "Electronic properties of the bulk and surface states of Fe1+ y Te1- x Se x," Nature Materials, vol. 20, p. 1221–1227, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Magnetism and Spin-Orbit Coupling in Iron Cbalcogenide Superconductors,

    J. Yao, G. Gu and Q. Li, "Magnetism and Spin-Orbit Coupling in Iron Cbalcogenide Superconductors," in 2024 IEEE International Magnetic Conference-Short papers (INTERMAG Short papers), 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Magnetic excitations in iron chalcogenide superconductors,

    H. Kotegawa and M. Fujita, "Magnetic excitations in iron chalcogenide superconductors," Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, vol. 13, p. 054302, 2012

    2012

  11. [19]

    Ultrafast Melting of Superconductivity in an Iron-Based Superconductor,

    D. Nevola, N. Zaki, J. M. Tranquada, W.-G. Yin, G. D. Gu, Q. Li and P. D. Johnson, "Ultrafast Melting of Superconductivity in an Iron-Based Superconductor," Physical Review X, vol. 13, p. 011001, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Evidence of local structural inhomogeneity in FeSe 1- x Te x from extended x-ray absorption fine structure,

    B. Joseph, A. Iadecola, A. Puri, L. Simonelli, Y . Mizuguchi, Y . Takano and N. L. Saini, "Evidence of local structural inhomogeneity in FeSe 1- x Te x from extended x-ray absorption fine structure," Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 82, p. 020502, 2010

    2010

  13. [21]

    Physical properties of FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 single crystals grown under different conditions,

    V . Tsurkan, J. Deisenhofer, A. Günther, C. Kant, M. Klemm, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, F. Schrettle and A. Loidl, "Physical properties of FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 single crystals grown under different conditions," The European Physical Journal B, vol. 79, p. 289–299, 2011

    2011

  14. [22]

    Quasi-2D superconductivity in FeTe0. 55Se0. 45 ultrathin film,

    F. Tang, P. Wang, P. Wang, Y . Gan, G. D. Gu, W. Zhang, M. He and L. Zhang, "Quasi-2D superconductivity in FeTe0. 55Se0. 45 ultrathin film," Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 31, p. 265702, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Geometry-dependent critical currents in superconducting nanocircuits,

    J. R. Clem and K. K. Berggren, "Geometry-dependent critical currents in superconducting nanocircuits," Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 84, p. 174510, 2011

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.