Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Dark-Matter Induced Scalarization of Black Holes in Extended Scalar-Tensor-Gauss-Bonnet Theories

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dark matter can make a spherical black hole spontaneously grow scalar hair.

desk verdict A correct, well-scoped linear-instability analysis for DM-triggered onset of scalarization in ESTGB; just don't take 'spontaneous scalarization' in the abstract literally. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15326 v1 pith:CNV66K3Y submitted 2025-04-21 gr-qc hep-th

Lei Tang , Jie Jiang This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th PACS 04.50.Kd04.70.-s95.35.+d
keywords spontaneousscalarizationscalar-tensor-Gauss-BonnettheoryperfectfluiddarkmattertachyonicinstabilityblackholescalarhairPFDM-SchwarzschildGB^-regimeno-hairtheorem
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Spontaneous scalarization is a route by which a black hole grows a new field, or hair, through an instability rather than by being born with it. In extended scalar-tensor-Gauss-Bonnet theory with a negative coupling, spherical black holes are usually immune: only rotating holes are known to scalarize. This paper argues that enshrouding the hole in perfect fluid dark matter removes that immunity. Once the dark matter parameter exceeds about $b/M \simeq 1.86287$, the scalar perturbation sees a negative effective mass outside the horizon, the perturbation grows in time, and the black hole enters a linearly scalarized state. If the claim holds, the local dark matter environment, not just spin, can decide whether the no-hair theorem is violated.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective mass of the scalar perturbation, $\mu_{\rm eff}^2=-\lambda G$, where $G$ is the Gauss-Bonnet invariant and $\lambda$ is the coupling constant. Evaluated on the PFDM-Schwarzschild background with $f(r)=1-2M/r-(b/r)\ln(r/|b|)$, it reduces to an explicit rational-logarithmic expression whose sign outside the event horizon is governed by a dimensionless function $F(r;M,b)$. The analysis (i) demands $\min_{r>r_+}\mu_{\rm eff}^2<0$, (ii) turns this into a bound on $\ln(r/b)$, (iii) eliminates the horizon radius using $f(r_+)=0$, and (iv) arrives at the closed-form threshold $(b/M)_{\rm crit}\simeq 1.86287$. Numerical time-domain evolution, using Runge-Kutta in time with finite differences in the tortoise coordinate and a fully finite-difference cross-check, then maps out the unstable region of the $(-\lambda/M^2, b/M)$ parameter plane.

What would settle it

Construct the full nonlinear static black hole solutions in PFDM-ESTGB theory with $\lambda<0$ and $b/M>1.86287$; if no scalarized branch exists, or if the endpoint of the linear instability is not a scalarized black hole, the central claim fails even though the linear instability is real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the extended scalar-tensor-Gauss-Bonnet (ESTGB) theory with $\lambda<0$, the PFDM-Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter has a tachyonic instability and undergoes linear spontaneous scalarization once $b/M > (b/M)_{\rm crit} = 12/[5+\sqrt{13}-6\ln((5+\sqrt{13})/6)] \simeq 1.86287$. In the vacuum Schwarzschild limit the effective mass $\mu_{\rm eff}^2=-\lambda G$ is strictly positive outside the horizon, which is why no scalarization occurs; the dark matter terms in the metric flip its sign in a region outside the horizon. The critical ratio is derived analytically from the requirement that a negative effective mass exist, and it is the lower boundary of the unstable region in the limit where the coupling strength $-\lambda/M^2$ diverges. Numerical time evolutions of the $l=0$ scalar mode confirm the unstable region, with the onset occurring near the extremal limit $b/M\to 2$ for small $|\lambda|$ and expanding as $|\lambda|$ grows.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a negative effective mass outside the horizon, which produces linear tachyonic instability, is enough to conclude that spontaneous scalarization occurs; the paper itself warns that this does not guarantee a stable scalarized black hole actually forms.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spherical black holes in the $\lambda<0$ regime are not automatically hairless: a dark matter halo dense enough to push $b/M$ above about 1.86287 switches on the scalar instability.
  • The threshold is a sharp lower bound: below $(b/M)_{\rm crit}$ no coupling strength produces instability, while above it the unstable window opens once $-\lambda/M^2$ is large enough.
  • Scalarization requires the dark matter parameter and the black hole mass to be of the same order of magnitude, so the effect is most relevant for low-mass or heavily dark-matter-contaminated black holes.
  • The confirmed linear instability marks the onset of scalarization; constructing the nonlinear scalarized solutions is the stated next step needed to complete the picture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sign-flip mechanism should operate in other dressed black hole spacetimes, such as charged, accreting, or anisotropic-fluid backgrounds, where the Gauss-Bonnet invariant outside the horizon differs enough from vacuum; the critical ratio would shift but the qualitative criterion would not.
  • A direct nonlinear evolution with PFDM initial data could settle whether the endpoint of the instability is a scalarized black hole, giving a concrete numerical test of the central scenario.
  • If such scalarized black holes exist, their ringdown and shadow would differ from Kerr scalarized holes, potentially offering gravitational-wave or electromagnetic signatures that distinguish dark-matter-induced hair from spin-induced hair.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a real scalar field nonminimally coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet invariant in extended scalar-tensor-Gauss-Bonnet (ESTGB) theory, on a spherically symmetric PFDM-Schwarzschild background. For negative coupling constant λ, the authors derive an analytic threshold (b/M)_crit ≈ 1.86287 from the condition that the effective mass squared of the linearized scalar field becomes negative outside the horizon, and they support this with numerical time evolutions of the linear Klein-Gordon equation obtained by two independent methods. The paper claims that this constitutes dark-matter-induced spontaneous scalarization of black holes in the GB^- regime.

Significance. The analytic derivation of Eq. (29) is clean and internally consistent, the extremal limit b=2M is handled correctly, and the numerical check in Figs. 3–5 is a useful independent confirmation of the parameter region in which scalar perturbations grow. The paper is the first, to my knowledge, to point out that PFDM can change the sign of the Gauss-Bonnet invariant sufficiently to permit a tachyonic instability in the spherically symmetric GB^- regime, which is an interesting observation. If the result were supplemented by actual scalarized black hole solutions, it would be a valuable contribution to the scalarization literature. At present, however, the advertised central claim exceeds what is demonstrated: the paper establishes a linear-instability onset, not the existence of scalarized black hole hair.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V, final paragraph; Secs. III–IV] The concluding paragraph of Sec. V explicitly states that the tachyonic instability is merely a necessary condition for the formation of scalarized black holes and does not guarantee the existence of stable branches of scalarized solutions. Despite this, the title, the abstract, and the discussions in Secs. III–IV repeatedly assert that PFDM induces spontaneous scalarization. The numerical evolution in Sec. IV solves only the linear test-field equation, Eq. (15)/(31), on a fixed PFDM-Schwarzschild background; no coupled nonlinear solution is constructed and no nonlinear time evolution is performed. The evidence therefore supports a condition for linear tachyonic instability, not the existence of scalar hair. The authors should either construct (or directly cite) actual scalarized solutions in this model, or consistently reframe the title, abstract, and conclusions as a linear tachyonic-instability analysis rather than spontaneous scalarization.
  2. [Sec. III, Eqs. (20)–(29); Fig. 5] Eq. (29) is presented as the critical value for the onset of scalarization, but the derivation uses only the condition min μ_eff^2 < 0 outside the horizon, which is a necessary but not sufficient condition for tachyonic instability at a finite coupling constant. The actual boundary of the unstable region is the numerical blue curve in Fig. 5, and Eq. (29) is at best the asymptotic lower boundary of that region as -λ/M^2 → ∞. The text should clearly distinguish the exact numerical onset curve from the analytic necessary-condition bound, and should not describe Eq. (29) as 'the critical condition for spontaneous scalarization at a given coupling constant.'
  3. [Eq. (3) and Eq. (12)] The scalar field equation is written as ∇^a∇_a φ = -(λ/4) F'(φ) G. With the stated coupling function F(φ) = 1 + 2λφ^2, this gives □φ = -λ^2 φ G, which would make the effective mass squared positive and would forbid the tachyonic instability analyzed in the rest of the paper. The standard ESTGB equation is □φ = -(1/4) F'(φ) G, which leads to μ_eff^2 = -λG as used in Eq. (12). Please correct Eq. (3) so that the field equations are consistent with the perturbation analysis that follows.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV.B] The sentence 'for b/M > (b/M)_crit ≃ 1.86287M' contains a spurious factor M; b/M is dimensionless and should simply read 'b/M > 1.86287.'
  2. [Fig. 5 caption; Sec. IV.B] The blue shaded region is described as the area where perturbations 'become unstable, resulting in spontaneous scalarization'; since the calculation is linear and on a fixed background, the caption should say 'tachyonic instability of the scalar perturbation' rather than asserting spontaneous scalarization.
  3. [References] Refs. [48] and [50] are the same Hod paper (Phys. Rev. D 102, 084060); one duplicate should be removed.
  4. [Sec. II] There are several minor typographical errors: 'by by' appears after Eq. (7), 'tenor' should be 'tensor' in the sentence after Eq. (9), and the method acronym is written as 'FR' in Sec. IV.B but 'RF' elsewhere.
  5. [Sec. IV.A] The Gaussian initial data in Eq. (36) depends on the parameters r_*^c and the width, but the numerical values of r_*^c and the grid resolution used in Figs. 3–5 are not reported; providing these values would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the critical threshold follows algebraically from the effective-mass condition, and the numerics independently solve the same linear Klein-Gordon equation without fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The central analytical result, Eq. (29), is obtained from the explicit effective mass (13), the quadratic condition F(z) < 0, the horizon relation f(r+) = 0, and the monotonicity of b/M as a function of b/r+; no parameter is fitted to the numerical data, and no output quantity is reused as an input. The numerical time evolution in Sec. IV solves the same linear Klein-Gordon equation (15), with the RF and FF methods as mutual checks, so Fig. 5 is a verification of the algebraic instability boundary rather than a construction that presupposes it. There are no load-bearing self-citations: the cited GB+ and GB- scalarization results [12-18] are external prior results used only to motivate the lambda < 0 case, and the PFDM background [45,46] is an independent input. The only weakness is that the paper infers spontaneous scalarization from linear tachyonic instability, a point the authors themselves qualify in Sec. V: 'tachyonic instability is merely a necessary condition for the formation of scalarized black holes and does not guarantee the existence of stable branches of scalarized solutions.' This is a strength-of-conclusion or evidentiary gap, not a circular reduction of the sort that would raise the circularity score. Since no claim is equivalent by construction to its input, the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, fields, or conserved quantities are invented. The analysis uses existing model parameters b and λ and standard linear perturbation theory; the main load-bearing input is the PFDM background metric from the cited literature and the identification of a negative effective mass with scalarization onset, which the paper itself flags as necessary but not sufficient.

free parameters (2)
  • PFDM parameter b
    Model parameter controlling PFDM density in metric (8) and stress tensor (10); the central result is a critical value of b/M, but b itself is an input scanned in [0,2M], not fitted to data.
  • Coupling constant λ
    Strength of the φ²G coupling in F(φ)=1+2λφ²; scanned over negative values in Fig. 5, not fitted.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The PFDM-Schwarzschild metric (7)-(8) with stress-energy (9)-(10) is an exact φ=0 background of the PFDM-ESTGB theory.
    Invoked in Sec. II; the background and its horizons come from Refs. [45,46] and are not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Weak energy condition requires b≥0, and black hole solutions exist only for 0≤b/M≤2.
    Used in Sec. II to restrict the parameter range and in the analytic threshold derivation; the extremal limit b=2M sets the upper boundary in Fig. 5.
  • domain assumption A negative effective mass term outside the horizon is the criterion for possible tachyonic instability and onset of linear scalarization.
    Used in Sec. III around Eq. (20) to derive (b/M)_crit; the paper later concedes this is necessary, not sufficient, so the threshold is an onset envelope rather than a proof of scalarized solutions.
  • domain assumption The linearized scalar perturbation equation (11)-(16) with the quadratic coupling expansion F(φ)=1+2λφ²+O(φ⁴) captures the leading-order instability.
    Adopted in Sec. II-III to separate variables and define the effective potential; higher-order scalar self-interactions are dropped.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dark-Matter Induced Scalarization of Black Holes in Extended Scalar-Tensor-Gauss-Bonnet Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CNV66K3Y

@misc{pith2026250415326,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dark-Matter Induced Scalarization of Black Holes in Extended Scalar-Tensor-Gauss-Bonnet Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CNV66K3Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15326}
}
abstract

In the extended scalar-tensor-Gauss-Bonnet theory, spontaneous scalarization in the GB\(^-\) regime typically occurs only in rotating black holes, while it is absent in spherically symmetric black holes, a phenomenon known as spin-induced scalarization. However, we find that when the spacetime is permeated by perfect fluid dark matter, spontaneous scalarization can also be induced by dark matter in the GB\(^-\) regime. Analytical calculations reveal that this scalarization occurs when the dark matter parameter \(b/M\) exceeds a critical value \((b/M)_\text{crit}\simeq1.86287\), a threshold determined by the lower boundary of the unstable region for scalar perturbations as the coupling constant approaches negative infinity. Additionally, we verified these findings through numerical analysis of the time evolution of scalar perturbations, identifying the unstable parameter region. The results show that when coupling constant \(-\lambda/M^2\) is small, spontaneous scalarization only occurs near the extremal black hole limit. As \(-\lambda/M^2\) increases, the scalarization region expands; however, its lower boundary remains above \(b/M \simeq 1.86287\), consistent with theoretical predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15326 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The effective mass term, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The time evolution of the scalar field perturbation for a given DM parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The figures show the time-domain profile at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. In the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Event horizons in static vacuum space-times,

    W. Israel, “Event horizons in static vacuum space-times,” Phys. Rev. 164, 1776-1779 (1967)

    work page 1967

  2. [2]

    Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two De- grees of Freedom,

    B. Carter, “Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two De- grees of Freedom,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 331-333 (1971)

    work page 1971

  3. [3]

    Introducing the black hole,

    R. Ruffini and J. A. Wheeler, “Introducing the black hole,” Phys. Today 24, no.1, 30 (1971)

    work page 1971

  4. [4]

    Non-Abelian Einstein Yang-Mills black holes

    M. S. Volkov and D. V. Galtsov, “Non-Abelian Einstein Yang-Mills black holes”, JETP Lett. 50, 346 (1989)

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Colored black holes,

    P. Bizon, “Colored black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2844-2847 (1990)

    work page 1990

  6. [6]

    Eluding the no hair conjecture: Black holes in spontaneously bro- ken gauge theories,

    B. R. Greene, S. D. Mathur and C. M. O’Neill, “Eluding the no hair conjecture: Black holes in spontaneously bro- ken gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 47, 2242-2259 (1993)

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    Dilatonic black holes in higher curvature string gravity,

    P. Kanti, N. E. Mavromatos, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis and E. Winstanley, “Dilatonic black holes in higher curvature string gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 54, 5049-5058 (1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    BLACK HOLES HAVE SKYRMION HAIR,

    H. Luckock and I. Moss, “BLACK HOLES HAVE SKYRMION HAIR,” Phys. Lett. B 176, 341-345 (1986)

    work page 1986

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    New black hole solutions with hair,

    S. Droz, M. Heusler and N. Straumann, “New black hole solutions with hair,” Phys. Lett. B 268, 371-376 (1991)

    1991

  2. [10]

    Asymptotically flat black holes with scalar hair: a review,

    C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, “Asymptotically flat black holes with scalar hair: a review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, no.09, 1542014 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Nonperturbative strong field effects in tensor - scalar theories of gravi- tation,

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, “Nonperturbative strong field effects in tensor - scalar theories of gravi- tation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2220-2223 (1993)

    1993

  4. [12]

    New Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes with Curvature-Induced Scalarization in Ex- tended Scalar-Tensor Theories,

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, “New Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes with Curvature-Induced Scalarization in Ex- tended Scalar-Tensor Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, no.13, 131103 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Spontaneous scalarization of black holes and compact stars from a Gauss-Bonnet coupling,

    H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou and E. Berti, “Spontaneous scalarization of black holes and compact stars from a Gauss-Bonnet coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, no.13, 131104 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Charged Gauss- Bonnet black holes with curvature induced scalarization in the extended scalar-tensor theories,

    D. D. Doneva, S. Kiorpelidi, P. G. Nedkova, E. Pa- pantonopoulos and S. S. Yazadjiev, “Charged Gauss- Bonnet black holes with curvature induced scalarization in the extended scalar-tensor theories,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.10, 104056 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Sponta- neously Scalarized Kerr Black Holes in Extended Scalar- Tensor–Gauss-Bonnet Gravity,

    P. V. P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, “Sponta- neously Scalarized Kerr Black Holes in Extended Scalar- Tensor–Gauss-Bonnet Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, no.1, 011101 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Spin-induced black hole spontaneous scalarization,

    A. Dima, E. Barausse, N. Franchini and T. P. Sotiriou, “Spin-induced black hole spontaneous scalarization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, no.23, 231101 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Spin-induced scalarized black holes,

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou and N. Yunes, “Spin-induced scalarized black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, no.1, 011103 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Spin-induced black-hole scalarization in Einstein-scalar- Gauss-Bonnet theory,

    E. Berti, L. G. Collodel, B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz, “Spin-induced black-hole scalarization in Einstein-scalar- Gauss-Bonnet theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, no.1, 011104 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Spin-induced black hole spontaneous scalariza- tion: Analytic treatment in the large-coupling regime,

    S. Hod, “Spin-induced black hole spontaneous scalariza- tion: Analytic treatment in the large-coupling regime,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.2, 024074 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Evasion of No-Hair Theorems and Novel Black-Hole Solutions in Gauss-Bonnet Theories,

    G. Antoniou, A. Bakopoulos and P. Kanti, “Evasion of No-Hair Theorems and Novel Black-Hole Solutions in Gauss-Bonnet Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, no.13, 131102 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Novel Black- Hole Solutions in Einstein-Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Theories with a Cosmological Constant,

    A. Bakopoulos, G. Antoniou and P. Kanti, “Novel Black- Hole Solutions in Einstein-Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Theories with a Cosmological Constant,” Phys. Rev. D 99, no.6, 064003 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Dynamics of the nonrotating and rotating black hole scalarization,

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, “Dynamics of the nonrotating and rotating black hole scalarization,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.6, 064024 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Dynamics of Spontaneous Black Hole Scalarization and Mergers in Einstein-Scalar- Gauss-Bonnet Gravity,

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, “Dynamics of Spontaneous Black Hole Scalarization and Mergers in Einstein-Scalar- Gauss-Bonnet Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, no.10, 101102 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Scalar pertur- bations on the background of Kerr black holes in the quadratic dynamical Chern-Simons gravity,

    Y. X. Gao, Y. Huang and D. J. Liu, “Scalar pertur- bations on the background of Kerr black holes in the quadratic dynamical Chern-Simons gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 99, no.4, 044020 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Spontaneously scalar- ized black holes in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity: dy- namics and equilibrium solutions,

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, “Spontaneously scalar- ized black holes in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity: dy- namics and equilibrium solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.8, 083007 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Onset of rotating scalar- ized black holes in Einstein-Chern-Simons-Scalar the- ory,

    Y. S. Myung and D. C. Zou, “Onset of rotating scalar- ized black holes in Einstein-Chern-Simons-Scalar the- ory,” Phys. Lett. B 814, 136081 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Rotating scalarized black holes in scalar couplings to two topological terms,

    D. C. Zou and Y. S. Myung, “Rotating scalarized black holes in scalar couplings to two topological terms,” Phys. Lett. B 820, 136545 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Massive scalar field perturbation on Kerr black holes in dynamical Chern–Simons gravity,

    S. J. Zhang, “Massive scalar field perturbation on Kerr black holes in dynamical Chern–Simons gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, no.5, 441 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Spontaneous Scalarization of Charged Black Holes,

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, N. Sanchis-Gual and J. A. Font, “Spontaneous Scalarization of Charged Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no.10, 101102 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr., Astrophys. J. 159, 379-403 (1970) doi:10.1086/150317

    1970 doi

  23. [31]

    Davis, G

    M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, C. S. Frenk and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J. 292, 371-394 (1985) doi:10.1086/163168

    1985 doi

  24. [32]

    J. P. Ostriker and P. J. E. Peebles, Astrophys. J. 186, 467-480 (1973) doi:10.1086/152513

    1973 doi

  25. [33]

    Barausse, V

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D 89, no.10, 104059 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.104059 [arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D 105, no.6, L061501 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L061501 [arXiv:2109.00005 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    M. H. Y. Cheung, K. Destounis, R. P. Macedo, E. Berti and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, no.11, 111103 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.111103 [arXiv:2111.05415 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. Panosso Macedo and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, no.24, 241103 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.241103 [arXiv:2210.01133 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Destounis, A

    K. Destounis, A. Kulathingal, K. D. Kokkotas and G. O. Papadopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 107, no.8, 084027 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.084027 [arXiv:2210.09357 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Traykova, K

    D. Traykova, K. Clough, T. Helfer, E. Berti, P. G. Ferreira and L. Hui, Phys. Rev. D 104, no.10, 103014 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.103014 [arXiv:2106.08280 [gr-qc]]. 9

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Clough, P

    K. Clough, P. G. Ferreira and M. Lagos, Phys. Rev. D 100, no.6, 063014 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063014 [arXiv:1904.12783 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Bamber, K

    J. Bamber, K. Clough, P. G. Ferreira, L. Hui and M. Lagos, Phys. Rev. D 103, no.4, 044059 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044059 [arXiv:2011.07870 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    A. A. Potapov, G. M. Garipova and K. K. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B 753, 140-146 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.057 [arXiv:1606.07733 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Rahaman, K

    F. Rahaman, K. K. Nandi, A. Bhadra, M. Kalam and K. Chakraborty, Phys. Lett. B 694, 10-15 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.038 [arXiv:1009.3572 [gr- qc]]

    2011 arXiv

  35. [43]

    V. V. Kiselev, [arXiv:gr-qc/0303031 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    V. V. Kiselev, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 3323-3336 (2004) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/13/014 [arXiv:gr-qc/0402095 [gr-qc]]

    2004 arXiv

  37. [45]

    V. V. Kiselev, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 541-558 (2005) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/3/007 [arXiv:gr-qc/0404042 [gr-qc]]

    2005 arXiv

  38. [46]

    M. H. Li and K. C. Yang, Phys. Rev. D86, 123015 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.123015 [arXiv:1204.3178 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2012 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hollands, R

    S. Hollands, R. M. Wald and J. Zahn, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, no.11, 115009 (2020) doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/ab8052 [arXiv:1912.06047 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Hod, JHEP 08, 272 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)272 [arXiv:2206.12074 [gr- qc]]

    S. Hod, JHEP 08, 272 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)272 [arXiv:2206.12074 [gr- qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Hod, Phys

    S. Hod, Phys. Rev. D 102, no.8, 084060 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.084060 [arXiv:2006.09399 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.