Quantum Corrections and Extremality: A Generalized Universal Relation

Ankit Anand

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 70 references

Quantum Corrections and Extremality: A Generalized Universal Relation

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For any entropy that is a function of horizon radius, the correction-to-extremality ratio equals the derivative of the area-law entropy.

desk verdict A clean chain-rule identity that explains reported Goon-Penco 'violations' for non-area entropies, but the paper overclaims universality beyond the cosmological-constant-shift deformation. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15646 v1 pith:FDUPT2YW submitted 2025-04-22 hep-th gr-qc

Ankit Anand This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thgr-qc

keywords blackholeentropyextremalitybounduniversalrelationquantumcorrectionslogarithmiccorrectionexponentialhigher-curvaturegravityproduct-logarithmfunction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the universal relation between corrections to black-hole entropy and shifts of the extremality bound survives quantum corrections, provided it is rewritten in a generalized form. The generalized identity says the ratio of the extremal-mass shift to the entropy shift equals the derivative of the area-law entropy with respect to the actual entropy, for any entropy that is a function of the horizon radius. The original area-law version of the relation is recovered exactly only for the area-law entropy. The paper verifies the generalized identity for logarithmic and exponential entropy corrections, including a higher-curvature example, and thereby accounts for earlier reported failures of the original relation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the generalized entropy function $S=\tilde f(r_h)$ together with its inverse $r_h(S)$, which lets the author express the mass and temperature of a charged anti-de Sitter black hole in terms of entropy. The identity that carries the argument is $$-\frac{(\partial M_{\rm ext}/\partial\varepsilon)}{T(\partial S/\partial\varepsilon)|_{M_{\rm ext}}}=\frac{\partial(\pi $r_h^{2}$)}{\partial S},$$ derived by perturbing the metric by $\varepsilon r^2/l^2$. The derivative $dr_h/dS$ is the key quantity: when it equals $1/(2\pi r_h)$, the right-hand side is 1 and the original relation is recovered; solving that equation gives $S=\pi r_h^2+S_0$. In the logarithmic and exponential examples the inversion is performed explicitly with the product-logarithm function, which turns the right-hand side into expressions like $W/(W+1)$ that approach 1 in the large-horizon limit.

What would settle it

Take a black hole with entropy $S=\tilde f(r_h)$ and perturb the action by a genuine higher-derivative term so the metric and temperature are modified at order $\varepsilon$, instead of the pure metric shift $\varepsilon r^2/l^2$. Compute the ratio $-(\partial M_{\rm ext}/\partial\varepsilon)/(T(\partial S/\partial\varepsilon))|_{M_{\rm ext}}$ and compare it with $\partial(\pi r_h^2)/\partial S$. If the equality fails for such a deformation, the claim as stated is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a generalized identity for near-extremal black holes: for any entropy $S=\tilde f(r_h)$ that is a single-valued function of the horizon radius $r_h$, the ratio of the perturbative shift of the extremal mass to the entropy shift evaluated at the extremal mass equals the derivative of the area-law entropy $\pi r_h^2$ with respect to $S$. The original universal relation, whose right-hand side is 1, is recovered if and only if $dr_h/dS = 1/(2\pi r_h)$, which fixes $S=\pi r_h^2+S_0$ and singles out the area law. The paper then verifies the generalized identity for a logarithmic entropy correction, including the higher-curvature example whose entropy contains a logarithmic term and whose inversion uses the product-logarithm function, and for an exponential entropy correction. In all these cases the identity is satisfied at first order in the perturbative parameter, so the apparent breakdowns of the original relation for non-area-law entropy are accounted for by the non-trivial right-hand side.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the perturbation is exactly the metric shift $\varepsilon r^2/l^2$ and that quantum corrections change only the entropy function, leaving the classical metric and temperature formulas untouched; it also requires the function $r_h(S)$ to be invertible.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any entropy $S=\tilde f(r_h)$ with an invertible horizon-radius function satisfies the generalized identity, so the structural form of the relation does not depend on the detailed correction.
The original relation with right-hand side 1 holds only for $S=\pi r_h^2+S_0$; this follows from solving $dr_h/dS=1/(2\pi r_h)$.
Logarithmic entropy corrections, including the higher-curvature example with $S=\pi r_h^2+4\pi\alpha\ln(r_h/\ell_0)$, satisfy the generalized identity at first order in $\varepsilon$.
Exponential entropy corrections $S_e=\alpha_e r_h^2+\beta_e e^{\gamma_e r_h^2}$ also satisfy the generalized identity.
Apparent failures of the original relation for non-area-law entropy correspond to a right-hand side $\partial(\pi r_h^2)/\partial S\neq 1$, not to the breakdown of universality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Inference: the generalized identity should extend to any entropy model with an invertible $r_h(S)$, including non-extensive entropy proposals, as long as the perturbation remains the same $\varepsilon r^2/l^2$ metric shift.
Inference: the relation can serve as a consistency check on quantum-gravity entropy proposals, because a proposed correction must be compatible with the unmodified classical mass and temperature used to compute both sides.
Inference: in the large-horizon limit the right-hand side approaches 1, so the original universality appears as the classical limit of a family of generalized relations with different entropy functions.
Inference: if extremal-mass shifts can be computed or measured independently, the right-hand side could be inverted to constrain the functional form of the entropy correction.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Plain take: this is a chain-rule identity, not a new universality law. The genuinely useful observation is that for the fixed Lambda-shift deformation (2.4)-(2.6), the Goon-Penco ratio equals d(pi r_h^2)/dS for any invertible entropy function S(r_h). That explains why reported violations of Eq. (1.2) for non-area entropies are not real violations; they are the same structure seen in a different entropy variable. That point is worth making clearly, and the paper makes it.

What's good: the central move in Section 3 is clean. I checked the stress-test derivation: differentiating f(r_h)=0 at fixed M and Q gives T dr_h/deps = -r_h^2/(4 pi l^2), and the ratio reduces to 2 pi r_h/S'(r_h), exactly d(pi r_h^2)/dS. No hidden assumption beyond invertibility of S(r_h) and the deformation being a cosmological-constant shift. The EGB example with Lambert W is a legitimate consistency check, and the algebra is plausible. Section 6 is honest that the background is kept fixed.

Soft spots, in proportion. First, the log and exponential sections are not tests. Since Eq. (1.3) is an identity for every injective S(r_h), substituting S_l and S_e into it cannot fail. Calling that 'verifying the generalized relation' overstates what is shown. Second, the claim that the relation extends to quantum corrections is unsupported. The only deformation ever considered is the epsilon r^2/l^2 shift; a genuine higher-derivative or quantum-gravity correction that changes f(r) or T(r) would introduce extra terms in the differentiation leading to Eq. (3.4). The paper assumes the background is unchanged rather than deriving that this is the right regime. Third, Eq. (3.4) is asserted, not derived; it is easy to fill in, but it should be shown. Fourth, dimensional consistency of the log/exponential entropy formulas and the branches of the Lambert W function are not discussed; minor in context. Fifth, the author's own earlier papers [50] and [54] on non-extensive entropy are not compared, so the incremental novelty is unclear.

I agree with the reader's judgment: the algebra is likely correct, the novelty is limited, and the circularity burden is real in the framing. But the paper is not empty. It gives a compact explanation for a set of reported deviations and could serve as a useful organizing note for people testing extremality relations.

Who this is for: practitioners in black hole thermodynamics who have seen Goon-Penco 'violations' in non-area entropy models. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject, because the identity is real and the literature would benefit from a corrected framing. I would send it to review with clear instructions to push for honest reframing and a comparison with the author's prior non-extensive entropy work.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a generalized version of the Goon-Penco universal relation, Eq. (1.3), in which the entropy is an arbitrary function S = f(r_h) of the horizon radius rather than the Bekenstein-Hawking area law. Under a perturbative deformation that the authors take to be a shift of the cosmological constant, Eqs. (2.4)-(2.6), they derive the relation -(∂M_ext/∂ε)/(T ∂S/∂ε)|_{M_ext} = ∂(π r_h^2)/∂S. They show that the original Goon-Penco relation (1.2) holds only when d r_h/dS = 1/(2π r_h), whose solution is the area-law entropy up to a constant. They then verify the generalized relation for a charged Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet example with logarithmic entropy correction (Section 3.1), and for general logarithmic (Section 4) and exponential (Section 5) entropy corrections.

Significance. The derivation of the identity (1.3) for the specific cosmological-constant deformation is algebraically correct, and the paper contains useful Lambert-W manipulations in the examples. If the claimed universality under genuine quantum corrections were established, the result would be of interest to the black-hole thermodynamics and weak-gravity-conjecture communities. However, as I explain in the major comments, the relation is an algebraic identity for the chosen deformation, and the examples merely substitute inverse functions into that identity. The physical claim of universality for perturbative and non-perturbative quantum corrections is therefore not supported, which substantially lowers the significance of the paper relative to its abstract.

major comments (3)

[Section 3, Eq. (3.4)] The generalized relation (1.3) is an identity, not a dynamical prediction. Starting from f_tot(r_h)=0 with the deformation (2.4)-(2.6), one obtains T dr_h/dε = -r_h^2/(4π l^2) at fixed M and Q. Combining this with ∂M/∂ε = r_h^3/(2l^2) and ∂S/∂ε = S'(r_h) dr_h/dε gives the left side of (1.3) as 2π r_h r_h' = d(π r_h^2)/dS, which is exactly the right side. Therefore Eq. (1.3) holds for every invertible entropy function S(r_h) under this deformation. Consequently, the verifications in Sections 4 and 5, which substitute the inverse functions S_ℓ^{-1} and S_e^{-1} into the identity, are guaranteed by construction and cannot fail. The statements in the abstract and Section 6 that the relation 'remains valid under a broad class of quantum corrections' are not established; only the cosmological-constant shift is treated.
[Sections 2, 4, 5, 6] The crucial physical assumption is that quantum corrections modify only the entropy functional while leaving the classical metric and temperature unchanged. This is stated explicitly in Section 6 and used throughout Sections 4 and 5. For genuine higher-derivative or quantum-gravity corrections, the metric function and temperature acquire ε-dependent corrections beyond the simple Λ shift in (2.6), and the differentiation leading to Eq. (3.4) would contain additional terms. The paper does not analyze such cases. The Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet example in Section 3.1 does not close this gap: the entropy correction comes from the Gauss-Bonnet coupling α, but the perturbative parameter ε is again only the cosmological-constant shift, so the example is again a substitution into the same identity rather than a test of the relation under the higher-curvature correction.
[Eqs. (3.5)-(3.6)] The uniqueness statement is imprecise. The general solution of dr_h/dS = 1/(2π r_h) is S = π r_h^2 + C, equivalently r_h^2 = S/π + S0 after redefining the integration constant. The paper's expression r_h = sqrt(S/π + S0) implies S = π r_h^2 - π S0, so the sign convention for S0 should be fixed. This does not affect the main identity, but the 'unique functional form' claim is unique only up to an additive constant and the notation should be corrected.

minor comments (7)

[Abstract] The sentence 'as well as a non-perturbative quantum correction manifests as an exponential term' is ungrammatical and should be rewritten.
[Eq. (1.1)] The typesetting is corrupted in places, e.g., 'A ∼ O(ℓ2 P)' and the mixed use of '∼' and '='; please check the display.
[Section 3, first paragraph] The sentence 'we start with the general expression of entropy as a function of entropy' should read '... horizon radius as a function of entropy'.
[Eq. (3.24) and similar] The notation 'EGBSh_BH' and 'Log.Sh_BH' is confusing; use unambiguous subscripts such as S_BH^{EGB} and S_BH^{log}.
[Section 3.1, final paragraph] The phrase 'Generalized uncertainty relation' should be 'Generalized universal relation'.
[Eqs. (4.1) and (5.1)] Please state the mass dimensions of αℓ, βℓ, γℓ and αe, βe, γe so that the arguments of the logarithmic and exponential functions are manifestly dimensionless.
[Section 6] The sentence 'since it is studied in the literature that the EGB gravity gets a correction in the metric function due to the EGB parameter' is unclear and should be rewritten.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The generalized relation (1.3) is a chain-rule identity for the fixed εr²/l² deformation; Sections 4 and 5 substitute entropy models into that identity, so their 'verification' is forced by construction.

self definitional [Section 3, Eqs. (3.1) and (3.4)]
"Using them, we can easily compute the numerator and denominator of Eq. (1.3) as −T (∂S/∂ε)|Mext = r_h²/(4π l² r_h′) and ∂Mext/∂ε = r_h³/(2l²)."

These two expressions are all that is needed: dividing ∂M_ext/∂ε by −T(∂S/∂ε)|_Mext gives (r_h³/2l²)/(r_h²/(4πl² r_h′)) = 2π r_h r_h′ = d(π r_h²)/dS, which is precisely the RHS of Eq. (1.3) once S_BH is defined as π r_h² with r_h = r_h(S). The derivation uses no property of S beyond invertibility (Eq. (3.1)), so Eq. (1.3) holds for every injective S(r_h) by the chain rule. The paper frames this as a derived relation, but it is a definitional identity of the chosen variables.
fitted input called prediction [Section 4 (logarithmic correction), text after Eq. (4.7); Section 5 (exponential correction), text after Eq. (5.5)]
"Finally, we compute the left-hand side using the thermodynamic identities for the extremal mass and entropy derivatives, as given in Eq. (4.3), Eq. (4.6), and Eq. (4.7), respectively, one can verify ... thereby confirming the validity of the generalized universal relation in the extremal limit of logarithmically corrected entropy."

The 'test' inserts the chosen S_l(r_h) (and correspondingly S_e(r_h) in Section 5) into the same first-order mass and temperature formulas whose differentiation already produced Eq. (3.4). Since those formulas made Eq. (1.3) an identity, the listed expressions for ∂M/∂ε and T(∂S/∂ε) are rearrangements of the same chain rule; agreement is guaranteed by construction. No alternative deformation, metric change, or independent microscopic computation is involved, so the claimed confirmation of universality under quantum corrections is not an independent test.

full rationale

The central derivation reduces to the inverse-function chain rule. Equation (3.4) states the two derivative quantities that, by Eq. (3.2), are computed for the cosmological-constant-shift deformation f_tot(r) = f(r) + ε r²/l². Their ratio is 2π r_h dr_h/dS = d(π r_h²)/dS, which is exactly how the right-hand side of Eq. (1.3) is defined. Therefore Eq. (1.3) is an identity for every invertible entropy function S = tilde f(r_h), and the logarithmic and exponential examples of Sections 4 and 5 are substitutions into that identity rather than independent checks. The only non-tautological content is the derivation of the condition d r_h/dS = 1/(2π r_h) for the original Goon–Penco relation, whose solution S = π r_h² + S0 is genuinely non-trivial and is not what the 'tests' in Sections 4 and 5 exercise. There is no load-bearing self-citation here: the Goon–Penco reference [31] is external and the author's own prior works are not invoked as evidence. The paper also restricts the deformation to a pure εr²/l² shift and assumes quantum corrections modify only the entropy functional, not the metric or temperature; that restriction is a limitation rather than a circular step, but it reinforces that the claimed universality for genuine quantum corrections is not established by this computation. Overall, the generalized relation is circular in the sense that its 'verification' is built into the definitions, though the area-law uniqueness side gives the paper some independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim relies on choosing an entropy function and a specific perturbation; no empirical inputs are fitted, but the coefficients in the entropy ansatze are free. The main structural assumption is that corrections do not change the classical geometry, which makes the relation a kinematical identity.

free parameters (4)

alpha_l, beta_l, gamma_l (logarithmic entropy coefficients)
Introduced in Eq. (4.1) as arbitrary coefficients of the logarithmic-corrected entropy S_l = alpha_l r^2 + beta_l ln(gamma_l r^2); no theoretical values or constraints are given.
alpha_e, beta_e, gamma_e (exponential entropy coefficients)
Introduced in Eq. (5.1) as arbitrary coefficients of the exponential-corrected entropy S_e = alpha_e r^2 + beta_e exp(gamma_e r^2); no values or constraints are given.
ell_0 (logarithmic length scale in EGB entropy)
In Eq. (3.18) the Gauss-Bonnet entropy includes 4 pi alpha ln(r_h/ell_0); ell_0 is an arbitrary dimensionful constant needed for a dimensionless logarithm.
S0 (integration constant in area-law uniqueness) = 0
Eq. (3.6) solves for r_h(S)=sqrt(S/pi+S0); S0 is set to 0 to recover the Bekenstein-Hawking form.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption A consistent thermodynamic description exists and the deformation parameter epsilon is smooth, with unperturbed quantities recovered as epsilon -> 0.
Section 1, after Eq. (1.5). This is the minimal setup inherited from Goon-Penco.
domain assumption The entropy S = tilde f(r_h) is invertible, so r_h(S) exists.
Section 3, Eq. (3.1): 'we start by assuming that the inverse function exists.' This can fail globally for some corrected entropy forms.
ad hoc to paper Quantum corrections modify only the entropy, not the classical metric or temperature.
Sections 2 and 6 state log/exponential corrections do not alter the classical solution; this allows the same M(r_h,epsilon) and T(r_h,epsilon) to be used with arbitrary S(r_h).
ad hoc to paper The perturbative deformation is specifically a shift of the cosmological constant, f_tot = f + epsilon r^2/l^2.
Eqs. (2.4)-(2.6). The derived relation is tied to this deformation; other higher-derivative perturbations are not treated.
standard math Lambert W function inverse identities and branch choice (principal branch) are valid for the inversion formulas.
Appendix A and Eqs. (3.19), (4.2), (5.2); branch conditions are not discussed.
domain assumption The D->4 Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet regularization yields a valid 4D charged AdS black hole solution.
Section 3.1, Eqs. (3.9)-(3.15); relies on the 4D EGB prescription from the cited literature.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Corrections and Extremality: A Generalized Universal Relation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FDUPT2YW

@misc{pith2026250415646,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Corrections and Extremality: A Generalized Universal Relation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FDUPT2YW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15646}
}

read the original abstract

Logarithmic corrections to the entropy of extremal black holes have proven effective in precisely matching the microscopic degeneracies obtained from string-theoretic as well as a non-perturbative quantum correction manifests as an exponential term in the black hole entropy. In this work, we extend the universal relation proposed by Goon and Penco by deriving a generalized form where entropy is not just the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Our analysis treats entropy as a general function of the horizon radius, and with the help of that, we formulate the generalized universal relation. We show that, in the case of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, the generalized relation coincides with the original universal relation by Goon and Penco. Furthermore, we explore the implications of logarithmic and exponential corrections to entropy and test the validity of the generalized universal relation under these modifications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

[50]

Universal Relations with the Non-Extensive Entropy Perspective,

A. Anand and S. Noori Gashti, “Universal Relations with the Non-Extensive Entropy Perspective,” arXiv:2411.02875 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[54]

Universality relation and thermodynamic topology with three-parameter entropy model,

A. Anand and S. N. Gashti, “Universality relation and thermodynamic topology with three-parameter entropy model,” Physics of the Dark Universe 48 (2025) 101916

work page 2025
[1]

Black holes and entropy,

J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333–2346

1973
[2]

Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,

J. D. Bekenstein, “Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,” Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3292–3300

work page 1974
[3]

Counting dyons in N=4 string theory,

R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “Counting dyons in N=4 string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 484 (1997) 543–561, arXiv:hep-th/9607026

arXiv 1997
[4]

Counting all dyons in N =4 string theory,

A. Dabholkar, J. Gomes, and S. Murthy, “Counting all dyons in N =4 string theory,” JHEP 05 (2011) 059, arXiv:0803.2692 [hep-th]

arXiv 2011
[5]

Black Hole Microstate Counting and its Macroscopic Counterpart,

I. Mandal and A. Sen, “Black Hole Microstate Counting and its Macroscopic Counterpart,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 214003, arXiv:1008.3801 [hep-th]

arXiv 2010
[6]

Quantum geometry and black hole entropy,

A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi, and K. Krasnov, “Quantum geometry and black hole entropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 904–907, arXiv:gr-qc/9710007

arXiv 1998

Show all 70 references

[7]

Logarithmic correction to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,

R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar, “Logarithmic correction to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5255–5257, arXiv:gr-qc/0002040

2000 arXiv
[8]

Black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity,

K. A. Meissner, “Black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 5245–5252, arXiv:gr-qc/0407052

2004 arXiv
[9]

Black hole entropy from quantum geometry,

M. Domagala and J. Lewandowski, “Black hole entropy from quantum geometry,” Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 5233–5244, arXiv:gr-qc/0407051

2004 arXiv
[10]

An Improved lower bound on black hole entropy in the quantum geometry approach,

A. Ghosh and P. Mitra, “An Improved lower bound on black hole entropy in the quantum geometry approach,” Phys. Lett. B 616 (2005) 114–117, arXiv:gr-qc/0411035

2005 arXiv
[11]

Absence of log correction in entropy of large black holes,

A. Ghosh and P. Mitra, “Absence of log correction in entropy of large black holes,” Phys. Lett. B 734 (2014) 49–51, arXiv:1206.3411 [gr-qc]

2014 arXiv
[12]

Logarithmic Corrections for Near-extremal Kerr-Newman Black Holes,

A. Modak, A. Singh, and B. Panda, “Logarithmic Corrections for Near-extremal Kerr-Newman Black Holes,” arXiv:2502.18173 [hep-th]

arXiv
[13]

Nonperturbative black hole entropy and Kloosterman sums,

A. Dabholkar, J. Gomes, and S. Murthy, “Nonperturbative black hole entropy and Kloosterman sums,” JHEP 03 (2015) 074, arXiv:1404.0033 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[14]

Exponential Corrections to Black Hole Entropy,

A. Chatterjee and A. Ghosh, “Exponential Corrections to Black Hole Entropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 4, (2020) 041302, arXiv:2007.15401 [gr-qc]

2020 arXiv
[15]

General logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy,

S. Das, P. Majumdar, and R. K. Bhaduri, “General logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy,” Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 2355–2368, arXiv:hep-th/0111001

2002 arXiv
[16]

P-V criticality of first-order entropy corrected AdS black holes in massive gravity,

S. Upadhyay, B. Pourhassan, and H. Farahani, “P-V criticality of first-order entropy corrected AdS black holes in massive gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 95 no. 10, (2017) 106014, arXiv:1704.01016 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[17]

PV criticality of the second order quantum corrected Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz black hole,

B. Pourhassan, “PV criticality of the second order quantum corrected Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no. 9, (2019) 740, arXiv:1905.13032 [physics.gen-ph]

2019 arXiv
[18]

P-V criticality of logarithm-corrected dyonic charged AdS black holes,

J. Sadeghi, B. Pourhassan, and M. Rostami, “P-V criticality of logarithm-corrected dyonic charged AdS black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 6, (2016) 064006, arXiv:1605.03458 [gr-qc] . – 17 –

2016 arXiv
[19]

Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state,

T. Jacobson, “Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 1260–1263, arXiv:gr-qc/9504004

1995 arXiv
[20]

Quantum fluctuations from thermal fluctuations in Jacobson formalism,

M. Faizal, A. Ashour, M. Alcheikh, L. Alasfar, S. Alsaleh, and A. Mahroussah, “Quantum fluctuations from thermal fluctuations in Jacobson formalism,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77 no. 9, (2017) 608, arXiv:1710.06918 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[21]

A Logarithmic Correction in the Entropy Functional Formalism,

F. Hammad and M. Faizal, “A Logarithmic Correction in the Entropy Functional Formalism,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25 no. 07, (2016) 1650080, arXiv:1507.02621 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[22]

Quantum corrections to a finite temperature BIon,

B. Pourhassan, S. Dey, S. Chougule, and M. Faizal, “Quantum corrections to a finite temperature BIon,” Class. Quant. Grav. 37 no. 13, (2020) 135004, arXiv:1905.03624 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[23]

Quantum gravity effects on Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz black hole,

B. Pourhassan, S. Upadhyay, H. Saadat, and H. Farahani, “Quantum gravity effects on Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz black hole,”Nucl. Phys. B 928 (2018) 415, arXiv:1705.03005 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[24]

Quantum fluctuations of a BTZ black hole in massive gravity,

B. Pourhassan, M. Faizal, Z. Zaz, and A. Bhat, “Quantum fluctuations of a BTZ black hole in massive gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 773 (2017) 325–331, arXiv:1709.09573 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[25]

String solitons,

M. J. Duff, R. R. Khuri, and J. X. Lu, “String solitons,” Phys. Rept. 259 (1995) 213–326, arXiv:hep-th/9412184

1995 arXiv
[26]

TASI lectures on black holes in string theory,

A. W. Peet, “TASI lectures on black holes in string theory,” in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 99): Strings, Branes, and Gravity , pp. 353–433. 8, 2000. arXiv:hep-th/0008241

2000 arXiv
[27]

Phase structures of the black Dp-D(p + 4)-brane system in various ensembles I: thermal stability,

D. Zhou and Z. Xiao, “Phase structures of the black Dp-D(p + 4)-brane system in various ensembles I: thermal stability,” JHEP 07 (2015) 134, arXiv:1502.00261 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[28]

Modulating the phase structure of black D6 branes in canonical ensemble,

J. X. Lu and R. Wei, “Modulating the phase structure of black D6 branes in canonical ensemble,” JHEP 04 (2013) 100, arXiv:1301.1780 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[29]

The phase structure of black D1/D5 (F/NS5) system in canonical ensemble,

J. X. Lu, R. Wei, and J. Xu, “The phase structure of black D1/D5 (F/NS5) system in canonical ensemble,” JHEP 12 (2012) 012, arXiv:1210.0708 [hep-th]

2012 arXiv
[30]

Phase structures of the black D p-D(p + 4)-brane system in various ensembles II: electrical and thermodynamic stability,

Z. Xiao and D. Zhou, “Phase structures of the black D p-D(p + 4)-brane system in various ensembles II: electrical and thermodynamic stability,” JHEP 09 (2015) 028, arXiv:1507.02088 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[31]

Universal Relation between Corrections to Entropy and Extremality,

G. Goon and R. Penco, “Universal Relation between Corrections to Entropy and Extremality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 no. 10, (2020) 101103, arXiv:1909.05254 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[32]

Quantum corrections to pair production of charged black holes in de Sitter space,

Y.-P. Wang, L. Ma, and Y. Pang, “Quantum corrections to pair production of charged black holes in de Sitter space,” JCAP 01 (2023) 007, arXiv:2209.00772 [gr-qc]

2023 arXiv
[33]

Higher-Derivative Corrections to Entropy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture in Anti-de Sitter Space,

S. Cremonini, C. R. T. Jones, J. T. Liu, and B. McPeak, “Higher-Derivative Corrections to Entropy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture in Anti-de Sitter Space,” JHEP 09 (2020) 003, arXiv:1912.11161 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[34]

On the extremality bound of stringy black holes,

P. A. Cano, T. Ort´ ın, and P. F. Ramirez, “On the extremality bound of stringy black holes,” JHEP 02 (2020) 175, arXiv:1909.08530 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[35]

The emergence of universal relations in the AdS black holes thermodynamics,

J. Sadeghi, B. Pourhassan, S. Noori Gashti, S. Upadhyay, and E. N. Mezerji, “The emergence of universal relations in the AdS black holes thermodynamics,” Phys. Scripta 98 no. 2, (2023) 025305, arXiv:2011.14366 [physics.gen-ph] . – 18 –

2023 arXiv
[36]

Universal thermodynamic relations with constant corrections for rotating AdS black holes,

S.-W. Wei, K. Yang, and Y.-X. Liu, “Universal thermodynamic relations with constant corrections for rotating AdS black holes,” Nucl. Phys. B 962 (2021) 115279, arXiv:2003.06785 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[37]

Universal thermodynamic extremality relations for charged AdS black hole surrounded by quintessence,

Q. Chen, W. Hong, and J. Tao, “Universal thermodynamic extremality relations for charged AdS black hole surrounded by quintessence,” arXiv:2005.00747 [gr-qc]

2005 arXiv
[38]

Thermodynamic extremality relations in massive gravity,

D. Chen, J. Tao, and P. Wang, “Thermodynamic extremality relations in massive gravity,” Chin. Phys. C 45 no. 2, (2021) 025108, arXiv:2004.10459 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[39]

Weak gravity conjecture of charged-rotating-AdS black hole surrounded by quintessence and string cloud,

J. Sadeghi, S. N. Gashti, I. Sakalli, and B. Pourhassan, “Weak gravity conjecture of charged-rotating-AdS black hole surrounded by quintessence and string cloud,” Nucl. Phys. B 1004 (2024) 116581, arXiv:2011.05109 [gr-qc]

2024 arXiv
[40]

D = 5 rotating black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: mass and angular momentum in extremality,

L. Ma, Y.-Z. Li, and H. Lu, “D = 5 rotating black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: mass and angular momentum in extremality,” JHEP 01 (2021) 201, arXiv:2009.00015 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[41]

Higher-derivative corrections to black hole entropy at zero temperature,

B. McPeak, “Higher-derivative corrections to black hole entropy at zero temperature,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 8, (2022) L081901, arXiv:2112.13433 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[42]

The weak gravity conjecture requires the existence of exotic AdS black holes,

B. McInnes, “The weak gravity conjecture requires the existence of exotic AdS black holes,” Nucl. Phys. B 971 (2021) 115525, arXiv:2104.07373 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[43]

Derivative corrections to extremal black holes with moduli,

M. Etheredge and B. Heidenreich, “Derivative corrections to extremal black holes with moduli,” JHEP 12 (2023) 174, arXiv:2211.09823 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[44]

Weak gravity conjecture, black branes and violations of universal thermodynamics relation,

J. Sadeghi, B. Pourhassan, S. Noori Gashti, and S. Upadhyay, “Weak gravity conjecture, black branes and violations of universal thermodynamics relation,” Annals Phys. 447 (2022) 169168, arXiv:2201.04071 [gr-qc]

2022 arXiv
[45]

Universality on thermodynamic relation with corrections in de Sitter black holes,

J. Ko and B. Gwak, “Universality on thermodynamic relation with corrections in de Sitter black holes,” JHEP 03 (2024) 072, arXiv:2312.17014 [gr-qc]

2024 arXiv
[46]

Stability of Extremal Black Holes and Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture in Kiselev Spacetime,

A. Anand, A. Mishra, and P. Channuie, “Stability of Extremal Black Holes and Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture in Kiselev Spacetime,” arXiv:2411.02427 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[47]

Thermodynamic extremality in Power-law AdS black holes: a universal perspective,

A. Anand, “Thermodynamic extremality in Power-law AdS black holes: a universal perspective,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85 no. 3, (2025) 241, arXiv:2409.07079 [hep-th]

2025 arXiv
[48]

Thermodynamic relation of accelerating black holes in anti-de Sitter spacetime,

C. O. Lee, “Thermodynamic relation of accelerating black holes in anti-de Sitter spacetime,” Nucl. Phys. B 1007 (2024) 116686, arXiv:2407.21329 [gr-qc]

2024 arXiv
[49]

Thermodynamic relation on higher-dimensional black hole with arbitrary cosmological constant,

J. Ko and B. Gwak, “Thermodynamic relation on higher-dimensional black hole with arbitrary cosmological constant,” Phys. Lett. B 860 (2025) 139149, arXiv:2406.10567 [gr-qc]

2025 arXiv
[51]

Analyzing WGC and WCCC through charged scalar fields fluxes with charged AdS black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter in the CFT thermodynamics,

A. Anand, S. Noori Gashti, M. R. Alipour, and M. A. S. Afshar, “Analyzing WGC and WCCC through charged scalar fields fluxes with charged AdS black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter in the CFT thermodynamics,” Nucl. Phys. B 1013 (2025) 116857, arXiv:2411.04134 [hep-th]

2025 arXiv
[52]

Universal relations of dyonic ModMax and Taub-NUT black holes thermodynamics and central charge,

F. Khosravani, J. Sadeghi, and S. Noori Gashti, “Universal relations of dyonic ModMax and Taub-NUT black holes thermodynamics and central charge,” Pramana 98 no. 3, (2024) 92. – 19 –

2024
[53]

The investigation of universal relation between corrections to entropy and extremality bounds with verification WGC,

J. Sadeghi, S. Noori Gashti, and E. Naghd Mezerji, “The investigation of universal relation between corrections to entropy and extremality bounds with verification WGC,” Phys. Dark Univ. 30 (2020) 100626

2020
[55]

Entropy Bounds on Effective Field Theory from Rotating Dyonic Black Holes,

C. Cheung, J. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, “Entropy Bounds on Effective Field Theory from Rotating Dyonic Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 4, (2019) 046003, arXiv:1903.09156 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[56]

Higher-order corrections to mass-charge relation of extremal black holes,

Y. Kats, L. Motl, and M. Padi, “Higher-order corrections to mass-charge relation of extremal black holes,” JHEP 12 (2007) 068, arXiv:hep-th/0606100

2007 arXiv
[57]

Higher derivative corrections to Kerr black hole thermodynamics,

H. S. Reall and J. E. Santos, “Higher derivative corrections to Kerr black hole thermodynamics,” JHEP 04 (2019) 021, arXiv:1901.11535 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[58]

Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy,

C. Cheung, J. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, “Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy,” JHEP 10 (2018) 004, arXiv:1801.08546 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[59]

The String landscape and the swampland,

C. Vafa, “The String landscape and the swampland,” arXiv:hep-th/0509212

arXiv
[60]

The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,

N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, and C. Vafa, “The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,” JHEP 06 (2007) 060, arXiv:hep-th/0601001

2007 arXiv
[61]

Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity,

T. Banks and N. Seiberg, “Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 084019, arXiv:1011.5120 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[62]

Weak gravity conjecture,

D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Weak gravity conjecture,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 no. 3, (2023) 035003, arXiv:2201.08380 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[63]

Thermodynamics, phase transition and Joule–Thomson expansion of 4-D Gauss–Bonnet AdS black hole,

K. Hegde, A. Naveena Kumara, C. L. Ahmed Rizwan, A. K. M., M. S. Ali, and S. Punacha, “Thermodynamics, phase transition and Joule–Thomson expansion of 4-D Gauss–Bonnet AdS black hole,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39 no. 21, (2024) 2450080, arXiv:2003.08778 [gr-qc]

2024 arXiv
[64]

Charged black holes in AdS spaces in 4D Einstein Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

P. G. S. Fernandes, “Charged black holes in AdS spaces in 4D Einstein Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 805 (2020) 135468, arXiv:2003.05491 [gr-qc]

2020 arXiv
[65]

String Generated Gravity Models,

D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, “String Generated Gravity Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2656

1985
[66]

Non-perturbative correction to the Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz black hole thermodynamics,

B. Pourhassan and I. Sakallı, “Non-perturbative correction to the Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz black hole thermodynamics,” Chin. J. Phys. 79 (2022) 322–338, arXiv:2210.07180 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[67]

Corrected thermodynamics and stability of magnetic charged AdS black holes surrounded by quintessence,

D. J. Gogoi, Y. Sekhmani, S. Bora, J. Rayimbaev, J. Bora, and R. Myrzakulov, “Corrected thermodynamics and stability of magnetic charged AdS black holes surrounded by quintessence,” JCAP 11 (2024) 019, arXiv:2407.10946 [gr-qc]

2024 arXiv
[68]

Logarithmic correction to the entropy of a Kerr-Newman family of black holes in U(1)2-charged STU supergravity models,

S. Karan, G. S. Punia, and S. Biswas, “Logarithmic correction to the entropy of a Kerr-Newman family of black holes in U(1)2-charged STU supergravity models,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 6, (2025) 066016, arXiv:2403.11823 [hep-th]

2025 arXiv
[69]

Non-perturbative correction on the black hole geometry,

B. Pourhassan, H. Farahani, F. Kazemian, I. Sakallı, S. Upadhyay, and D. V. Singh, “Non-perturbative correction on the black hole geometry,” Phys. Dark Univ. 44 (2024) 101444, arXiv:2403.07972 [gr-qc] . – 20 –

2024 arXiv
[70]

Exploring non-perturbative corrections in thermodynamics of static dirty black holes,

S. Soroushfar, B. Pourhassan, and I. Sakallı, “Exploring non-perturbative corrections in thermodynamics of static dirty black holes,” Phys. Dark Univ. 44 (2024) 101457, arXiv:2312.05948 [hep-th] . – 21 –

2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [50]

Universal Relations with the Non-Extensive Entropy Perspective,

A. Anand and S. Noori Gashti, “Universal Relations with the Non-Extensive Entropy Perspective,” arXiv:2411.02875 [gr-qc]

arXiv

[2] [54]

Universality relation and thermodynamic topology with three-parameter entropy model,

A. Anand and S. N. Gashti, “Universality relation and thermodynamic topology with three-parameter entropy model,” Physics of the Dark Universe 48 (2025) 101916

work page 2025

[3] [1]

Black holes and entropy,

J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333–2346

1973

[4] [2]

Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,

J. D. Bekenstein, “Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,” Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3292–3300

work page 1974

[5] [3]

Counting dyons in N=4 string theory,

R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “Counting dyons in N=4 string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 484 (1997) 543–561, arXiv:hep-th/9607026

arXiv 1997

[6] [4]

Counting all dyons in N =4 string theory,

A. Dabholkar, J. Gomes, and S. Murthy, “Counting all dyons in N =4 string theory,” JHEP 05 (2011) 059, arXiv:0803.2692 [hep-th]

arXiv 2011

[7] [5]

Black Hole Microstate Counting and its Macroscopic Counterpart,

I. Mandal and A. Sen, “Black Hole Microstate Counting and its Macroscopic Counterpart,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 214003, arXiv:1008.3801 [hep-th]

arXiv 2010

[8] [6]

Quantum geometry and black hole entropy,

A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi, and K. Krasnov, “Quantum geometry and black hole entropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 904–907, arXiv:gr-qc/9710007

arXiv 1998