Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Automated Creativity Evaluation for Large Language Models: A Reference-Based Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.15784 v1 pith:D24G6AOJ submitted 2025-04-22 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords creativecreativitymethodtextsapproachassessmentsautomatedevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Creative writing is a key capability of Large Language Models (LLMs), with potential applications in literature, storytelling, and various creative domains. However, evaluating the creativity of machine-generated texts remains a significant challenge, as existing methods either rely on costly manual annotations or fail to align closely with human assessments. In this paper, we propose an effective automated evaluation method based on the Torrance Test of Creative Writing (TTCW), which evaluates creativity as product. Our method employs a reference-based Likert-style approach, scoring generated creative texts relative to high-quality reference texts across various tests. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the alignment between LLM evaluations and human assessments, achieving a pairwise accuracy of 0.75 (+15\%).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Style Wins, Substance Loses: A Diagnosis of LLM-as-Judge in Idea Generation

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM judges of scientific ideas are measurably swayed by writing style; a style-detecting module reduces but does not remove the bias.

  2. ProactiveEval: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Proactive Dialogue Agents

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A unified evaluation framework for proactive dialogue agents, built with 328 synthetic environments across six domains, shows that thinking modes improve target planning but not dialogue guidance in a 22-model comparison.

  3. LitBench: A Benchmark and Dataset for Reliable Evaluation of Creative Writing

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Small reward models trained on LitBench reach 78% agreement with upvote-derived human preferences in creative writing, beating all zero-shot LLM judges tested.

Pith tools