Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Injection locking of Rydberg dissipative time crystals

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A radio-frequency electric field can lock the intrinsic oscillation of a Rydberg dissipative time crystal to the drive frequency.

desk verdict A real experimental demonstration of injection locking in a Rydberg dissipative time crystal, with a theory section that needs strengthening before the quantitative claims can be taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16210 v1 pith:MCRY7W3A submitted 2025-04-22 quant-ph

Darmindra Arumugam This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords injectionlockingdissipativetimecrystalsRydbergatomssynchronizationradio-frequencyelectricfieldAdlerequationmean-fieldmodelcesiumvapor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Spontaneous ~11.2 kHz oscillations in a room-temperature Rydberg dissipative time crystal can be injection-locked by a weak radio-frequency electric field. In a cesium vapor, the RF drive couples two Rydberg sublevels, gradually pulls the oscillation toward the drive frequency, and above a critical field amplitude locks it abruptly; the measured locking bandwidth grows linearly with field strength, $\Delta\omega_{\rm lock}=\kappa E$. The paper reports that higher harmonics of the oscillation are also entrained, meaning the injected signal locks the full nonlinear temporal waveform, and that the locked state has narrower linewidth and lower frequency drift than the free-running crystal. These observations matter because they give a tunable external control handle for a quantum many-body temporal phase, with potential use in sensing, metrology, and timekeeping.

What carries the argument

The central object is the excited-state coherence $\sigma_{rs}$ between two closely spaced Rydberg levels $\lvert r\rangle$ and $\lvert s\rangle$, driven by the RF field through the term $(i\Omega_{rs}/2)(n_r-n_s)e^{i\delta_s t}$. Writing this coherence as $A(t)e^{i[\delta_s t+\phi(t)]}$ and isolating the imaginary part gives an Adler-like phase equation for the phase difference $\phi$; locking occurs when a steady phase solution exists, $\Delta\omega < 2K\Omega_{rs}$. The mean-field V-type model supplies the populations $n_r,n_s$ and the nonlinear energy shift $E_{NL}=\chi(n_r+n_s)$ that set the natural oscillation and the forcing-strength factor $K=(n_r-n_s)/2A$.

What would settle it

Run the mean-field model with the dropped coupling term included and compare its locking-bandwidth-versus-field curve to the paper's measured $\Delta\omega_{\rm lock}=\kappa E$ data; any substantial deviation from the measured linear slope, or a locking threshold that no longer matches, would indicate the central claim does not hold. The same can be checked experimentally by pushing the drive to larger amplitudes or larger frequency offsets, where the neglected coupling grows.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the room-temperature Rydberg dissipative time crystal—a many-body limit-cycle oscillation near 11.2 kHz generated by mode competition among Zeeman-shifted Rydberg sublevels—can be entrained by a weak radio-frequency electric field. Sweeping the RF frequency toward the natural oscillation produces gradual frequency pulling and then abrupt synchronization above a critical field strength; the locking bandwidth extracted from these measurements grows linearly with the RF amplitude, $\Delta\omega_{\rm lock} = \kappa E$. Higher harmonics of the oscillation are pulled and locked as well, so the injected field entrains the full nonlinear temporal waveform, not just the fundamental. A mean-field V-type three-level model with an RF-induced coherence between excited Rydberg states yields a phase equation of the Adler form, $\dot\phi = \Delta\omega/2 + K\Omega_{rs}\cos\phi$, whose steady-state condition $\Delta\omega < 2K\Omega_{rs}$ predicts exactly the observed linear bandwidth scaling.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation of the locking rule drops one coupling term from the equations of motion, calling it subdominant in the locking regime without quantifying the condition; if that term is not actually small, the predicted linear relation between field strength and locking bandwidth could break down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A weak RF field, on the order of a few mV/cm, is enough to pull and lock a Rydberg DTC's ~11.2 kHz oscillation, giving an external control knob for the temporal order.
  • The observed relation $\Delta\omega_{\rm lock}=\kappa E$ means the locking range can be set predictably by field amplitude, with the extracted constant $\kappa$ related to a magnetic-field-induced dipole moment.
  • Higher harmonics being entrained means the locked state is a synchronized nonlinear oscillation, not merely a frequency-matched sine wave; this can reduce spectral width and frequency drift.
  • The threshold field rises with detuning, so the system behaves like a narrowband frequency discriminator around the natural oscillation frequency.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension not pursued in the paper: if the linear bandwidth law holds beyond the tested range, the critical field needed to lock at a known detuning is a direct readout of that detuning, so the same cell could serve as a self-calibrating RF frequency or electric-field sensor.
  • The paper reports harmonic entrainment qualitatively but does not quantify harmonic phase relations; a direct measurement of locked harmonic phases versus drive amplitude would test whether the entire limit-cycle waveform is truly reproduced or only its frequencies.
  • Applying the same phase-equation reduction to a lattice of coupled Rydberg DTCs could predict collective synchronization, phase clustering, or topological time-domain order—effects the paper names as future directions but does not model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports an experimental and theoretical study of injection locking of the spontaneous ~11.2 kHz oscillations in a room-temperature Cesium Rydberg vapor (the "dissipative time crystal") by a low-frequency RF electric field. The authors observe frequency pulling, abrupt synchronization above a threshold field, an injection-locking bandwidth that increases with RF amplitude, entrainment of higher-order harmonics, and linewidth narrowing of the locked oscillation. They model the system with a V-type three-level mean-field treatment, derive an Adler-like phase equation for the excited-state coherence, and compare the predicted scaling Δωlock = κE with the measured bandwidths using an induced-dipole estimate corrected by an empirical factor α≈0.11. The paper claims quantitative agreement between experiment and the mean-field/phase model.

Significance. If the results hold, the demonstration that a collective Rydberg oscillation can be externally entrained and stabilized is of clear interest for quantum metrology, RF sensing, and the control of many-body temporal order. The paper's strengths are the direct observation of injection pulling and locking under both field and frequency sweeps, the harmonic entrainment data, the step-on transient showing rapid phase capture, the three-day repeatability reported in Supplementary Section 4, and the full V-type numerical simulations that reproduce the qualitative locking behavior. The main quantitative theoretical support, however, is weakened by an unjustified truncation in the phase-equation derivation and by the use of a fitted correction factor in the scaling comparison.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods, 'Derivation of injection locking bandwidth'] The reduction of the σ_rs equation to its 'effective' form omits the term iΩ(σ_gs−σ_rg)/2 with only the remark that it is 'subdominant in the locking regime.' In the full first-moment equations of Supplementary Section 3, this term is the channel through which the laser-driven ground-state coherences feed the r–s coherence; dropping it removes a coupling that is part of the mechanism sustaining the natural oscillation being locked. No quantitative estimate of its size is given, and an order-of-magnitude check with the quoted parameters (Ω/2π≈14 MHz, γ/2π≈25 kHz, Δs/2π≈30 MHz) indicates that the forced ground-coherence contribution can be comparable to the retained drive term at Ωrs∼γ. Because the Adler-like phase equation and the locking condition Δω<2KΩrs rest on this truncation, the analytic locking-bandwidth prediction is not established as written. Please either retain the term in the derivation or provide a quantitative numerical comparison, such as solving the full first-moment equations and directly extracting the phase dynamics, showing that the neglected term is indeed negligible in the locking regime.
  2. [Methods, phase equation and 'Results' comparison with experiment] The phase equation identifies the natural oscillation frequency as ωOSC→Δs−Δr, but in the V-type mean-field model the limit-cycle frequency is set by the interaction-induced nonlinear energy shift E_NL and by the instability mechanism, not simply by the bare detuning difference; the equivalence is asserted without derivation or numerical verification. Since this identification enters the definition of Δω/2 and hence the locking condition, the quantitative mapping between the model's oscillation frequency and the experimental ~11.2 kHz OSC needs to be established explicitly, for example by computing the free-running mean-field spectrum with the stated parameters.
  3. [Results, 'Locking bandwidth and field scaling', Fig. 4b] The claimed quantitative agreement between the measured slope and theory is obtained by introducing an empirical correction factor α≈0.11, while the forcing-strength factor K=(n_r−n_s)/(2A) is not evaluated from model parameters. Thus the prediction Δωlock=κE with κ=α(Kd_ind/ℏ) is fitted to the data rather than independently predicted; the linear functional form is generic Adler-type behavior. To support the statement that the mean-field model quantitatively captures the locking bandwidth, the paper should provide an independent estimate of K and d_ind (or of their product), show that the fitted α is consistent with an independently constrained uncertainty budget, and report confidence intervals for the fit.
  4. [Fig. 4b and Methods, locking bandwidth extraction] The locking-bandwidth data in Fig. 4b are presented without error bars or fit diagnostics. The Methods describe the extraction procedure only verbally, with no report of the number of repeated sweeps, the fit uncertainties, or the residuals. Given that the central quantitative claim is the linear scaling Δωlock=κE, the absence of uncertainty estimates makes it impossible to judge the significance of the reported slope and of α≈0.11. Please provide per-point uncertainties (for example from repeated runs or from the fit covariance) and fit statistics such as R² or confidence intervals.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results, induced dipole description] The sentence 'The induced dipole moment d_ind here can be through of as arising from weak magnetic-field mixing' should read 'thought of'; also, the phrase 'through of' appears only in the Results section and should be corrected.
  2. [Methods, Hamiltonian definition] The definition of σ_αβ uses a mismatched bracket, ⟨α_i|β_i], in the Hamiltonian paragraph; it should be ⟨α_i|β_i⟩.
  3. [Fig. 4b caption] The caption notation is inconsistent with the text: the text defines κ=α(Kd_ind/ℏ) and Δωlock=κE, while the caption writes Δω=αE with α in kHz/(mV/cm); please unify the notation and define all symbols consistently.
  4. [Fig. 6c and Methods] The value K~0.014 is quoted without units; since K=(n_r−n_s)/(2A) has dimensions determined by A, please state the units used for K and for the Rabi frequency axis.
  5. [Throughout] Please copyedit the text for small errors, including 'at abruptly locks', 'the the OSC magnitude', 'is also IP towards the INJ frequency', and the reference entry [2], which lists 'Nat. Phys. 113, 210401' with a Physical Review Letters DOI; the journal name and volume should be corrected.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The quantitative slope of Δωlock=κE is fitted, not predicted: α~0.11 is chosen to match the data, and K is read off numerical fits.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results, 'Locking bandwidth and field scaling'; Fig. 4b; Methods, 'Derivation of injection locking bandwidth']
    "To account for uncertainties in the mixing strength and interaction geometry, we introduce an empirical correction factor α, giving κ → K(αd_ind)/ℏ. The observed linear trend in Fig. 4b is consistent with the model prediction, with α~0.11 indicating reduced effective coupling relative to the uncorrected mixing estimate."

    The theory curve said to 'predict' Δωlock=κE is obtained only after choosing α~0.11 so that κ = K(αd_ind)/ℏ matches the experimentally measured slope in Fig. 4b. The slope is therefore an empirical fit, not an ab initio prediction. The remaining content is the generic Adler functional form, imported from classical injection-locking theory rather than independently derived for this system.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Methods, 'Injection dynamics in Rydberg mean-field models' (Fig. 6c discussion) and 'Derivation of injection locking bandwidth']
    "A linear relationship is observed between the locking bandwidth and Ωrs, consistent with Δω = 2KΩrs (K~0.014, Fig 6c). ... K = (n_r − n_s)/2A is considered a forcing strength scaling factor."

    The analytic phase equation leaves K as an unspecified combination of dynamical variables. The quoted value K~0.014 is obtained by fitting the numerical critical points in Fig. 6c. Thus Δωlock = 2KΩrs is a restatement of a fitted line through simulation output, not a parameter-free result; when carried into the experimental comparison via κ = K(αd_ind)/ℏ, the quantitative slope has no independent predictive content.

full rationale

The experimental observation of a linear locking bandwidth versus RF field is a genuine empirical result and is not itself circular. However, the paper's quantitative theoretical support is partly circular: the slope κ is adjusted through an empirical factor α~0.11 to match the measured data, and the intermediate 'prediction' Δω=2KΩrs uses a constant K read off a fit to numerical critical points. Consequently, the statement 'the observed linear trend ... is consistent with the model prediction' is true only because the model was calibrated to that trend. The functional form is Adler's classical locking result, so the linearity is expected on general grounds, but the specific slope is fitted. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present; the main external reference to the Rydberg DTC (Ref. 6) is prior independent work. A separate correctness concern (not circularity) is the unquantified neglect of iΩ(σ_gs−σ_rg)/2 in the phase-equation derivation, which can affect the validity of the Adler-like reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative claim depends on a chain of modelling assumptions (V-type mean-field, subdominant term neglect, constant K) and on an empirically fitted correction α. The experimental observation of locking itself does not depend on these, but the claimed quantitative agreement with theory does.

free parameters (2)
  • Empirical correction factor alpha = 0.11
    Introduced in the Discussion and Fig. 4b to match the theoretical bandwidth slope to the experimental data, absorbing uncertainty in the induced dipole moment and geometry.
  • V-type mean-field model parameters (Ω, Δ_r, Δ_s, V) = not specified
    Required for the numerical simulations in Figs 5-6, but not reported in the text or supplements; the extracted K~0.014 depends on these unstated choices.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The many-body Rydberg system is approximated by a V-type three-level model with uniform interaction strengths V_ij.
    This simplification follows Ref. 6 and is used for the mean-field Hamiltonian and phase equation; the real multi-sublevel system is reduced to three levels.
  • domain assumption Mean-field factorization of inter-atomic correlations, e.g., ⟨n_r σ_gr⟩ ≈ ⟨n_r⟩⟨σ_gr⟩.
    Standard in driven-dissipative Rydberg mean-field treatments, used to close the equations of motion in Methods.
  • ad hoc to paper The term iΩ(σ_gs − σ_rg)/2 in the σ̇_rs equation is subdominant and can be neglected.
    Stated without quantitative justification in the 'Derivation of injection locking bandwidth' section, this neglect is essential to obtain the Adler-like phase equation.
  • ad hoc to paper The forcing strength K = (n_r − n_s)/(2A) can be treated as a constant when deriving the locking bandwidth.
    Though n_r − n_s and A are dynamical variables, they are assumed fixed in the phase equation to yield the linear locking condition.
  • domain assumption The induced dipole moment d_ind can be estimated perturbatively from Zeeman mixing between 76D5/2 and 77P3/2.
    This estimate gives d_ind ~ 4.96e-28 C·m, but the empirical factor α is later introduced because the mixing strength and interaction geometry are uncertain.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Injection locking of Rydberg dissipative time crystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MCRY7W3A

@misc{pith2026250416210,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Injection locking of Rydberg dissipative time crystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MCRY7W3A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16210}
}
read the original abstract

Non-equilibrium Rydberg gases exhibit exotic many-body phases stabilized by the interplay of coherent interactions and dissipation. Strong Rydberg interactions drive sustained limit cycle oscillations, whose robustness, long-range temporal order, and spontaneous time-translation symmetry breaking establish a dissipative time crystal (DTC). Collective self-entrainment in driven ensembles leads to global synchronization and a dominant oscillation frequency. Here, injection locking of a Rydberg DTC is demonstrated using a radio-frequency (RF) electric field that gradually pulls the intrinsic oscillation toward the injected frequency. Above a critical threshold, full synchronization occurs, with the locking bandwidth scaling linearly with RF amplitude. This includes synchronization of higher-order harmonics, revealing entrainment of the system nonlinear temporal dynamics. The phenomenon parallels injection locking in classical nonlinear systems, but emerges here in a strongly interacting quantum medium. This approach establishes a new method for stabilizing and controlling quantum temporal order, with applications in precision sensing, quantum metrology, and timekeeping.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16210 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental protocol, energy diagram, mean-field treatmentsimulations, and experimental observations. (a) Counter-propagating probe and coupler laser beams are directed through a room-temperature Cesium vapor cell. Inside the cell, a parallel-plate capacitor enables the application of low-frequency electric fields (E-field). A static magnetic field (B-field) is applied to induce mode competition among the excited R… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a-c) Spectral snapshots of OSC dynamics under strong and weak RF injection (INJ). The INJ frequency (fINJ) is gradually moved towards the natural OSC frequency. (a) E=4.2mV/cm. OSC at about 11.2kHz is seen to gradually shift towards INJ, locking at ~11.8kHz. The locking is referred to as INJ lock (IL). Within an effective bandwidth from the OSC, referred to as the locking bandwidth, the signal remains locked. (b) E… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a-c) Spectral snapshots of OSC dynamics under strong and weak RF injection (INJ). The INJ frequency (fINJ) is gradually moved towards the natural OSC frequency. (a) E=4.2mV/cm. OSC at about 11.2kHz is seen to gradually shift towards INJ, locking at ~11.8kHz. The locking is referred to as INJ lock (IL). Within an effective bandwidth from the OSC, referred to as the locking bandwidth, the signal remains locked. (b) E… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) With E-field held constant at 4 mV/cm, a gradual pulling (IP) occurs as the RF field frequency is slowly tuned closer to the natural OSC frequency. Higher order harmonics of the OSC is also IP towards the INJ frequency. (b) In a step-on regime, where the INJ (4mV/c…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Frequency Comb Behavior of Time Crystals in an RF-Driven Dissipative Rydberg System

    physics.atom-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Under strong RF heterodyne drive, a cesium Rydberg vapor in a dissipative time-crystal phase produces a 2.5 kHz-spaced frequency comb in its atomic coherence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Diehl, S., Micheli, A., Kantian, A. et al. Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms. Nature Phys 4, 878–883 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1073

    doi:10.1038/nphys1073 2008

  2. [2]

    Marcuzzi, M., Levi, E., Diehl, S., Garrahan, J. P . & Lesanovsky, I. Universal nonequilibrium properties of dissipative Rydberg gases. Nat. Phys. 113, 210401 (2014). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.210401

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.210401 2014

  3. [3]

    Antiferromagnetic phase transition in a nonequilibrium lattice of Rydberg atoms

    Lee TE, Häffner H, Cross MC. Antiferromagnetic phase transition in a nonequilibrium lattice of Rydberg atoms. Phys Rev A. 2011;84(3):031402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.031402

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.84.031402 2011

  4. [4]

    Emergence of synchronization in a driven-dissipative hot Rydberg vapor

    Wadenpfuhl K, Adams CS. Emergence of synchronization in a driven-dissipative hot Rydberg vapor. Phys Rev Lett. 2023;131(14):143002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.143002

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.143002 2023

  5. [5]

    Dongsheng Ding et al., Ergodicity breaking from Rydberg clusters in a driven-dissipative many-body system. Sci. Adv. 10, eadl5893 (2024). DOI:10.1126/sciadv.adl

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adl 2024

  6. [6]

    Wu, X., Wang, Z., Yang, F. et al. Dissipative time crystal in a strongly interacting Rydberg gas. Nat. Phys. 20, 1389–1394 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02542-9

    doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02542-9 2024

  7. [7]

    Quantum time crystals

    Wilczek, F. Quantum time crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160401 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    & Vinjanampathy, S

    Krishna, M., Solanki, P ., Hajdušek, M. & Vinjanampathy, S. Measurement-Induced Continuous Time Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 150401 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    & Lesanovsky, I

    Carollo, F. & Lesanovsky, I. Exact solution of a boundary time- crystal phase transition: time -translation symmetry breaking and non-Markovian dynamics of correlations. Phys. Rev. A 105, L040202 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    & Fazio, R

    Iemini, F., Russomanno, A., Keeling, J., Schirò, M., Dalmonte, M. & Fazio, R. Boundary time crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 035301 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Time crystals: Can diamagnetic currents drive a charge density wave into rotation? Europhys

    Nozières, P . Time crystals: Can diamagnetic currents drive a charge density wave into rotation? Europhys. Lett. 103, 57008 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    R., Bahovadinov, M

    Bakker, L. R., Bahovadinov, M. S., Kurlov, D. V., Gritsev, V., Fedorov, A. K. & Krimer, D. O. Driven -dissipative time crystalline phases in a two -mode bosonic system with Kerr nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 250401 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    & Zheng, W

    Nie, X. & Zheng, W. Mode softening in time -crystalline transitions of open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 107, 033311 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    G., Hemmerling, M., Mathey, L

    Keßler, H., Cosme, J. G., Hemmerling, M., Mathey, L. & Hemmerich, A. Emergent limit cycles and time crystal dynamics in an atom -cavity system. Phys. Rev. A 99, 053605 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    & Jaksch, D

    Buˇca, B., Tindall, J. & Jaksch, D. Non -stationary coherent quantum many -body dynamics through dissipation. Nat. Commun. 10, 1730 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    & Esslinger, T

    Dogra, N., Landini, M., Kroeger, K., Hruby, L., Donner, T. & Esslinger, T . Dissipation-induced structural instability and chiral dynamics in a quantum gas. Science 366, 1496–1499 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    A Study of Locking Phenomena in Oscillators,

    R. Adler, "A Study of Locking Phenomena in Oscillators," Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 351–357, 1946

    1946

  10. [18]

    Kuramoto, Y . (1975). Self-entrainment of a population of coupled nonlinear oscillators. In H. Araki (Ed.), International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, vol. 39, pp. 420–422. Springer

    1975

  11. [19]

    & Bruder, C

    Roulet, A. & Bruder, C. Quantum synchronization and entanglement generation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 063601 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Zhang, L., Wang, Z., Wang, Y ., Zhang, J., Wu, Z., Jie, J. & Lu, Y . Quantum synchronization of a single trapped-ion qubit. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033209 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Injection locking of oscillators,

    L. J. Paciorek, “Injection locking of oscillators,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1723-1727, 1965

    1965

  14. [22]

    & Kurths, J

    Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M. & Kurths, J. Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001)

    2001

  15. [23]

    Strogatz, S. H. From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators. Physica D 143, 1–20 (2000)

    2000

  16. [24]

    Acebrón, J. A. et al. The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 137–185 (2005). Figure Legends: Fig. 1: Experimental protocol, energy diagram, mean-field treatment simulations, and experimental observations. (a) Counter - propagat...

    2005

  17. [25]

    ⟨𝜎ˆ𝑔𝑟 𝑖 ⟩ 𝑑 𝑑𝑡 ⟨𝜎ˆ𝑔𝑠 𝑖 ⟩ = 𝑖 Ω 2 (2⟨𝑛ˆ 𝑠 𝑖 ⟩ + ⟨𝑛ˆ 𝑟 𝑖 ⟩ + ⟨𝜎ˆ𝑟𝑠 𝑖 ⟩ − 1) +𝑖 (Δ𝑠 − ∑ 𝑗≠𝑖 𝑉𝑖𝑗(⟨𝑛ˆ 𝑟 𝑗⟩ + ⟨𝑛ˆ 𝑠 𝑗⟩) + 𝑖 𝛾

  18. [26]

    ⟨𝜎ˆ𝑔𝑠 𝑖 ⟩ 𝑑 𝑑𝑡 ⟨𝜎ˆ𝑟𝑠 𝑖 ⟩ = 𝑖 Ω 2 (⟨𝜎ˆ𝑔𝑠 𝑖 ⟩ − ⟨𝜎ˆ𝑟𝑔 𝑖 ⟩) − 𝑖(Δ𝑟 − Δ𝑠 − 𝑖𝛾)⟨𝜎ˆ𝑟𝑠 𝑖 ⟩ + 𝑖 Ω𝑟𝑠 2 (⟨𝑛ˆ 𝑟 𝑖 ⟩ − ⟨𝑛ˆ 𝑠 𝑖 ⟩)𝑒𝑖𝛿𝑠𝑡. Supplementary Section 4 Repeatability of injection locking in Rydberg DTC To assess the stability and reproducibility of injection pulling (IP) and locki...

    2025

  19. [27]

    V., Bauer, B

    Else, D. V., Bauer, B. & Nayak, C. Floquet time crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 090402 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.090402

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    & Zakrzewski, J

    Sacha, K. & Zakrzewski, J. Time crystals: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 016401 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361- 6633/aa8b38

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    Y ., Potter, A

    Yao, N. Y ., Potter, A. C., Potirniche, I.-D. & Vishwanath, A. Discrete time crystals: rigidity, criticality, and realizations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 030401 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.030401

    2017 doi

  22. [30]

    & Sondhi, S

    Khemani, V., Lazarides, A., Moessner, R. & Sondhi, S. L. Phase structure of driven quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250401 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.250401 Extended Data F ig. 3: Colormap datasets collected as part of a data collection campaign, wit...

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.