Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quantum Technologies for Beyond 5G and 6G Networks: Applications, Opportunities, and Challenges

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that quantum technologies—quantum computing, QKD, QSDC, and post-quantum cryptography—are becoming critical enablers of beyond-5G and 6G networks, and maps them onto RAN, core, edge, transport, and security layers.

desk verdict A broad, useful survey that overstates the near-term role of quantum computing in 6G; worth peer review after claims are tempered and editorial errors fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.17133 v1 pith:RZ2E2I6M submitted 2025-04-23 quant-ph cs.NI

Engin Zeydan , Chamitha De Alwis , Rabia Khan , Yekta Turk , Abdullah Aydeger , Thippa Reddy Gadekallu , Madhusanka Liyanage This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcs.NI
keywords 6Gnetworksquantumkeydistributionpost-quantumcryptographycomputingnetworkoptimizationsecuredirectcommunicationrepeatersbeyond5G
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a survey, and its claim is a directional one: quantum technologies are on track to become critical enablers of beyond-5G and 6G networks. It argues that classical computing and cryptography will hit limits that quantum-assisted optimization, quantum key distribution, quantum secure direct communication, and post-quantum cryptography are positioned to address. A sympathetic reader should care because the paper frames 6G not as a pure classical engineering problem but as a hybrid quantum-classical system whose design choices are being made now. It also lays out why integration is hard: hardware immaturity, cost, standards gaps, and connectivity limits.

What carries the argument

The paper's central organizing device is a layered map that assigns each quantum capability to a 6G architectural layer: quantum-assisted radio access (MIMO, reconfigurable surfaces, channel estimation), core/edge/transport functions (QAOA, quantum annealing, quantum reinforcement learning, repeaters, teleportation), and security (QKD, QSDC, PQC, quantum error correction). The load-bearing mechanisms are QKD's eavesdrop-detectable key exchange, the hybrid quantum-classical optimization loop of QAOA and annealing, and entanglement-based repeater and teleportation links. This map is what turns a list of quantum techniques into a deployment roadmap for 6G.

What would settle it

Run a head-to-head benchmark on a realistic 6G network-slicing or spectrum-allocation instance, comparing current quantum annealing and QAOA circuits against optimized classical heuristics; if quantum methods show no advantage in solution quality or time on instances at the scale 6G requires, the optimization pillar of the survey's case collapses even if the QKD security pillar stands.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a roadmap: quantum technologies should be built into each layer of the 6G architecture rather than bolted on later. The paper asserts that quantum key distribution (QKD) can give theoretically unbreakable key exchange with detectable eavesdropping, that quantum secure direct communication (QSDC) can carry messages over quantum channels without key exchange, that post-quantum cryptography (PQC) can protect classical infrastructure from quantum attacks, and that algorithms such as QAOA and quantum annealing can handle NP-hard network optimization problems more efficiently than classical methods. It further claims that quantum error correction, quantum repeaters, and teleportation are the path to reliable long-distance quantum transport. The survey's contribution is to organize these pieces into a layered, system-oriented picture with technology-readiness levels attached to each component.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that quantum computers will deliver practical performance advantages for 6G's large-scale optimization problems and that quantum hardware will scale to the thousands of fault-tolerant qubits those tasks require; the paper itself flags both as open challenges while building its main narrative on them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • 6G security standards should plan a migration path in which QKD-generated keys feed existing IPsec and MACsec frameworks alongside PQC, making networks quantum-resistant before fault-tolerant quantum computers arrive.
  • Network operators should treat traffic management, spectrum allocation, network slicing, and congestion control as candidate workloads for QAOA and quantum annealing, starting with hybrid quantum-classical solvers.
  • Long-distance quantum transport in 6G will rely on quantum repeaters and teleportation because the no-cloning theorem forbids classical-style amplification of quantum signals.
  • Quantum-assisted radio components such as quantum MIMO, RIS phase optimization, and channel estimation remain the least mature area, so early deployment is more likely in core and security functions.
  • Hybrid quantum-classical systems, not standalone quantum infrastructure, are the realistic deployment model for the B5G and 6G era.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the security and optimization pillars have different risk profiles: QKD and PQC protect against future quantum computers even if the claimed optimization speedups never arrive.
  • Beyond the paper, a near-term benchmark could settle the optimization claim: compare current quantum annealing and QAOA against classical heuristics on realistic 6G network-slicing or spectrum-allocation instances before standards are frozen.
  • Beyond the paper, the paper's own technology-readiness numbers imply quantum clocks and quantum sensors may enter 6G networks earlier than full quantum computing, a route that deserves equal attention in deployment roadmaps.
  • Beyond the paper, adopting standard quantum key-management interfaces now would make later quantum integration cheaper by letting QKD, PQC, and classical key management interoperate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This survey argues that quantum technologies are becoming critical enablers of beyond-5G and 6G networks, covering quantum computing, QKD, QSDC, PQC, quantum error correction, and hybrid quantum-classical approaches. It organizes the discussion around RAN, core, edge, transport, and security layers, provides comparison tables of 5G/6G features and quantum algorithms, and closes with lessons learned, remaining research questions, and future directions. The paper is primarily a synthesis of the existing literature rather than a derivation, and its main claim is that 6G design should incorporate quantum components early, at least in hybrid form.

Significance. If the central claim is accepted, the survey provides a useful system-oriented map of quantum technology integration points across the 6G stack, and its layered structure is a genuine organizational contribution over isolated topic surveys. The paper also merits credit for assembling a broad reference base, summarizing TRL levels, and explicitly listing open research questions and deployment challenges. However, its significance is tempered by the fact that the central enabler argument for quantum computing rests on performance claims that are not benchmarked at 6G-relevant scale, and some technical statements are inaccurate as written. The survey is therefore a potentially valuable reference if its load-bearing claims are qualified and its editorial defects are fixed.

major comments (4)
  1. [II-B and IV-A] The unqualified statements that "QC can tackle these large-scale optimization problems more efficiently than classical methods" (Section II-B) and that QAOA and quantum annealing offer "faster convergence, better approximations, and scalability" (Section IV-A) are load-bearing for the paper's central thesis, yet no end-to-end comparison against classical solvers on 6G-scale network problems is provided or cited. The cited works are algorithmic proposals or small-scale demonstrations, not validated network-scale benchmarks. Since Section VI-A and VI-E themselves state that current hardware is NISQ, cannot perform large-scale operations, and will likely require thousands of fault-tolerant qubits for 6G tasks, these claims should be reframed as open research hypotheses with explicit boundary conditions, or supported with comparative quantitative evidence.
  2. [IV-C] The statement that quantum teleportation "permits instantaneous and secure information transfer independent of the physical distance between the communication parties" is physically incorrect. Teleportation requires prior shared entanglement and classical communication, and no information propagates faster than light. This error affects the technical credibility of the transport-network discussion and should be corrected, together with the subsequent claim that teleportation "eliminates the need for direct physical transmission."
  3. [VI-A and VI-E] There is an internal tension between the optimistic framing in Sections II and IV and the challenges acknowledged in Section VI. The paper states that current quantum hardware "cannot perform large-scale operations" (VI-A), that "network operations require millions of qubits being processed" and "thousands of fault-tolerant qubits" (VI-E), and that coherence times remain extremely short. The survey does not provide a roadmap or timeline showing how these prerequisites will be met within the 6G deployment window, so the "critical enabler" framing for quantum computing is not supported by the evidence presented. The authors should either supply such a roadmap or explicitly narrow the claimed role of QC in 6G to plausible near-term, hybrid applications while presenting the rest as longer-term possibilities.
  4. [Section I-B and Section VII] The paper contains two consecutive sections numbered VII ("Deployment Challenges" and "Lessons Learned and Future Research Directions"), and the outline in Section I-B refers to both as Section VII, which is internally inconsistent. This is more than a typographical slip because it obscures the layered structure that the paper advertises as its main organizational contribution; the section numbering and the outline should be reconciled.
minor comments (5)
  1. [I-A and IV] Unresolved placeholder cross-references such as "as highlighted in Section II-A and ??" and "quantum optimization for network control (Section ??)" appear in the introduction and in Section IV; these must be replaced with actual section numbers before publication.
  2. [Reference [176]] The Qiskit reference points to https://www.powerledger.io rather than to the Qiskit documentation; this incorrect URL should be fixed.
  3. [V-C and VI-E] The text at the end of Section VI-E says "Table VIII summarizes the deployment challenges and solutions," but the deployment-challenges table is Table IX; the cross-reference should be corrected.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical and grammatical issues, including "qbits", "V olumetric", "6g", "yo increase", "once of the significant challenges", and the duplicated entry for Glisic et al. 2024 in Table II. A careful copyedit is needed.
  5. [II-C and V] Some technical descriptions are loose, such as defining qubit storage as "all the possible combinations of zeroes and ones" without explaining measurement collapse, and describing QSDC as operating "without encryption or traditional key exchange" while later requiring classical sifting; these passages should be tightened for precision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a survey that synthesizes external literature; no derivation, fit, or self-citation chain forces its conclusions.

full rationale

This manuscript is a survey, not a derivation chain. It makes no mathematical predictions, fits no parameters, and does not reduce any claimed result to an input by construction. The central claim that quantum technologies are becoming critical enablers of 6G is presented as a synthesis of the cited literature, with supporting references drawn overwhelmingly from external groups and venues. The few self-citations (e.g., [10], [52], [175], [185]) are ordinary prior-work references in a survey context; none is invoked as an unverified uniqueness theorem, none forbids alternative approaches, and none is used to define a quantity in terms of the paper's own target claim. Moreover, the paper explicitly acknowledges the weakest assumptions: Section VI-E states that network operations require millions of qubits and that 6G tasks will likely require thousands of fault-tolerant qubits, and Section VI-A notes that NISQ hardware lacks solid debugging tools and cannot perform large-scale operations. These admissions show that the survey does not conceal its premises behind its conclusions. Because there is no equation-level reduction, no fitted input renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not fit parameters or invent entities; it is a qualitative survey. The listed axioms are background assumptions the survey inherits from the 6G and quantum computing literature.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Quantum computing hardware will eventually reach fault-tolerance and sufficient qubit counts (thousands) for 6G tasks.
    The survey's optimistic scenario for 6G relies on this maturation, acknowledged as an open challenge in Section VI-E.
  • standard math QKD provides information-theoretic security for key exchange.
    This is a well-established result from quantum cryptography, cited in Sections V-A and II-B.
  • domain assumption 6G will adopt a service-based, cloud-native architecture with AI-native controls, as described in Section IV-A.
    The mapping of quantum technologies to 6G layers presupposes this architectural direction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Technologies for Beyond 5G and 6G Networks: Applications, Opportunities, and Challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RZ2E2I6M

@misc{pith2026250417133,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Technologies for Beyond 5G and 6G Networks: Applications, Opportunities, and Challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RZ2E2I6M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.17133}
}
read the original abstract

As the world prepares for the advent of 6G networks, quantum technologies are becoming critical enablers of the next generation of communication systems. This survey paper investigates the convergence of quantum technologies and 6G networks, focusing on their applications, opportunities and challenges. We begin with an examination of the motivations for integrating quantum technologies into 6G, investigating the potential to overcome the limits of classical computing and cryptography. We then highlight key research gaps, particularly in quantum communication, quantum computing integration and security enhancement. A comprehensive overview of quantum technologies relevant to 6G, including quantum communication devices, quantum computing paradigms, and hybrid quantum-classical approaches is provided. A particular focus is on the role of quantum technologies in enhancing 6G Radio Access Networks (RAN), 6G core and edge network optimization, and 6G security. The survey paper also explores the application of quantum cryptography with a focus on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), Quantum Secure Direct Communication (QSDC) and quantum-resistant cryptographic algorithms and assesses their implementation challenges and potential impact on 6G networks. We also discuss the significant challenges associated with integrating quantum technologies into existing communications infrastructures, including issues of technological maturity, standardization, and economic considerations. Finally, we summarize the lessons learned from current research and outline future research directions to guide the ongoing development of quantum-enabled 6G networks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.17133 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Quantum-enabled 6G vision projected in the paper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Quantum enabled 6G illustrated with corresponding layers. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Quantum technologies integrated RAN 6G Technology. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quantum technologies and supported applications for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Potential QKD and PQC Placements within 6G. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Quantum computing deployment challenges in 6G. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. OSI Stack Redesign for Quantum Networks: Requirements, Technologies, Challenges, and Future Directions

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a Quantum-Converged OSI stack with nine layers, adding Layer 0 (Quantum Substrate) and Layer 8 (Cognitive Intent Plane) to the classical OSI model for quantum networks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

192 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [176]

    [Online]

    “Qiskit,” 2024, accessed on 30.08.2024. [Online]. Available: https: //www.powerledger.io

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Bo ˇzani´c and S

    M. Bo ˇzani´c and S. Sinha, Mobile communication networks: 5G and a vision of 6G . Springer, 2021

    2021

  3. [2]

    6G Wireless Communication Systems: Applications, Requirements, Tech- nologies, Challenges, and Research Directions,

    M. Z. Chowdhury, M. Shahjalal, S. Ahmed, and Y . M. Jang, “6G Wireless Communication Systems: Applications, Requirements, Tech- nologies, Challenges, and Research Directions,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 1, pp. 957–975, 2020

    2020

  4. [3]

    Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution,

    J. P. Dowling and G. J. Milburn, “Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 361, no. 1809, pp. 1655–1674, 2003

    2003

  5. [4]

    Quantum-enabled 6G wireless networks: Opportunities and challenges,

    C. Wang and A. Rahman, “Quantum-enabled 6G wireless networks: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 58–69, 2022

    2022

  6. [5]

    The quantum internet: A synergy of quantum information technologies and 6G networks,

    G. G. Rozenman et al., “The quantum internet: A synergy of quantum information technologies and 6G networks,” IET Quantum Communi- cation, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 147–166, 2023

    2023

  7. [6]

    AI-driven quantum technology for en- hanced 6G networks: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions,

    N. A. Alshaer and T. I. Ismail, “AI-driven quantum technology for en- hanced 6G networks: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions,” Journal of Laser Science and Applications , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2024

    2024

  8. [7]

    Alternative security options in the 5G and IoT era,

    D. Schinianakis, “Alternative security options in the 5G and IoT era,” IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine , vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 6–28, 2017

    2017

Show all 192 references
  1. [8]

    Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring,

    P. W. Shor, “Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring,” in Proceedings 35th annual symposium on foundations of computer science . Ieee, 1994, pp. 124–134

    1994

  2. [9]

    An extensive review on quantum computers,

    S. Nandhini, H. Singh, and U. Akash, “An extensive review on quantum computers,” Advances in Engineering Software , vol. 174, p. 103337, 2022

    2022

  3. [10]

    Survey on 6G Frontiers: Trends, Applications, Requirements, Technologies and Future Research,

    C. De Alwis, A. Kalla, Q.-V . Pham, P. Kumar, K. Dev, W.-J. Hwang, and M. Liyanage, “Survey on 6G Frontiers: Trends, Applications, Requirements, Technologies and Future Research,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , 2021. 27

    2021

  4. [11]

    5G: A tutorial overview of standards, trials, challenges, deployment, and practice,

    M. Shafi and Mothers, “5G: A tutorial overview of standards, trials, challenges, deployment, and practice,” IEEE journal on selected areas in communications, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1201–1221, 2017

    2017

  5. [12]

    What should 6G be?

    S. Dang, O. Amin, B. Shihada, and M.-S. Alouini, “What should 6G be?” Nature Electronics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2020

    2020

  6. [13]

    A survey on low latency towards 5g: Ran, core network and caching solutions,

    I. Parvez, A. Rahmati, I. Guvenc, A. I. Sarwat, and H. Dai, “A survey on low latency towards 5g: Ran, core network and caching solutions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3098– 3130, 2018

    2018

  7. [14]

    Quantum secured 6G technology-based applications in internet of everything,

    K. Prateek, N. K. Ojha, F. Altaf, and S. Maity, “Quantum secured 6G technology-based applications in internet of everything,” Telecommu- nication Systems, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 315–344, 2023

    2023

  8. [15]

    Quantum computing and neuroscience for 6g/7g networks: Survey,

    S. Glisic and B. Lorenzo, “Quantum computing and neuroscience for 6g/7g networks: Survey,” Intelligent Systems with Applications , p. 200346, 2024

    2024

  9. [16]

    A survey on post-quantum cryptography for 5g/6g communications,

    R. Zhou, H. Guo, F. E. Teo, and S. Bakiras, “A survey on post-quantum cryptography for 5g/6g communications,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  10. [17]

    Quantum-empowered federated learning and 6g wireless networks for iot security: Concept, challenges and future directions,

    D. Javeed, M. S. Saeed, I. Ahmad, M. Adil, P. Kumar, and A. N. Islam, “Quantum-empowered federated learning and 6g wireless networks for iot security: Concept, challenges and future directions,” Future Generation Computer Systems , 2024

    2024

  11. [18]

    A comprehensive survey on 6g and beyond: Enabling technologies, opportunities of machine learning and challenges,

    A. T. Jawad, R. Maaloul, and L. Chaari, “A comprehensive survey on 6g and beyond: Enabling technologies, opportunities of machine learning and challenges,” Computer Networks, p. 110085, 2023

    2023

  12. [19]

    Survey of promising technologies for quantum drones and networks,

    A. Kumar, S. Bhatia, K. Kaushik, S. M. Gandhi, S. G. Devi, A. D. J. Diego, and A. Mashat, “Survey of promising technologies for quantum drones and networks,” Ieee Access, vol. 9, pp. 125 868–125 911, 2021

    2021

  13. [20]

    Securing nextg networks with physical-layer key generation: A survey,

    Q. Xiao, J. Zhao, S. Feng, G. Li, and A. Hu, “Securing nextg networks with physical-layer key generation: A survey,” Security and Safety , vol. 3, p. 2023021, 2024

    2024

  14. [21]

    Char- acterizing and utilizing the interplay between quantum technologies and non-terrestrial networks,

    H. Al-Hraishawi, J. U. Rehman, M. Razavi, and S. Chatzinotas, “Char- acterizing and utilizing the interplay between quantum technologies and non-terrestrial networks,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2024

    2024

  15. [22]

    6g ecosystem: Current status and future perspective,

    J. R. Bhat and S. A. Alqahtani, “6g ecosystem: Current status and future perspective,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 43 134–43 167, 2021

    2021

  16. [23]

    Quantum technologies for smart cities: A comprehensive review and analysis,

    A. Bashirpour Bonab, M. Fedele, V . Formisano, and I. Rudko, “Quantum technologies for smart cities: A comprehensive review and analysis,” Available at SSRN 4231189 , 2022

    2022

  17. [24]

    From classical to quantum machine learning: Survey on routing optimization in 6g software defined networking,

    O. Bouchmal, B. Cimoli, R. Stabile, J. J. Vegas Olmos, and I. Tafur Monroy, “From classical to quantum machine learning: Survey on routing optimization in 6g software defined networking,” Frontiers in Communications and Networks , vol. 4, p. 1220227, 2023

    2023

  18. [25]

    Quantum-Inspired Real-Time Optimisation for 6G Net- works: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Road ahead,

    T. Q. Duong, L. D. Nguyen, B. Narottama, J. A. Ansere, D. Van Huynh, and H. Shin, “Quantum-Inspired Real-Time Optimisation for 6G Net- works: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Road ahead,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , 2022

    2022

  19. [26]

    Quantum machine learning for next-g wireless communications: Fundamentals and the path ahead,

    B. Narottama, Z. Mohamed, and S. A ¨ıssa, “Quantum machine learning for next-g wireless communications: Fundamentals and the path ahead,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , 2023

    2023

  20. [27]

    Future quantum communications and networking: A review and vision,

    P. Zhang, N. Chen, S. Shen, S. Yu, S. Wu, and N. Kumar, “Future quantum communications and networking: A review and vision,” IEEE Wireless Communications, 2022

    2022

  21. [28]

    Towards the industrialisation of quantum key distribution in communi- cation networks: A short survey,

    R. Liu, G. G. Rozenman, N. K. Kundu, D. Chandra, and D. De, “Towards the industrialisation of quantum key distribution in communi- cation networks: A short survey,”IET Quantum Communication, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 151–163, 2022

    2022

  22. [29]

    Quan- tum internet—applications, functionalities, enabling technologies, chal- lenges, and research directions,

    A. Singh, K. Dev, H. Siljak, H. D. Joshi, and M. Magarini, “Quan- tum internet—applications, functionalities, enabling technologies, chal- lenges, and research directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2218–2247, 2021

    2021

  23. [30]

    A survey of important issues in quantum computing and communications,

    Z. Yang, M. Zolanvari, and R. Jain, “A survey of important issues in quantum computing and communications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1059–1094, 2023

    2023

  24. [31]

    A survey analysis of quantum computing adoption and the paradigm of privacy engineering,

    N. Mousa and F. Shirazi, “A survey analysis of quantum computing adoption and the paradigm of privacy engineering,” Security and Privacy, p. e419, 2024

    2024

  25. [32]

    Quantum computing review: A decade of research,

    S. K. Sood et al., “Quantum computing review: A decade of research,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , vol. 71, pp. 6662– 6676, 2023

    2023

  26. [33]

    The evolution of quantum secure direct communication: on the road to the qinternet,

    D. Pan et al., “The evolution of quantum secure direct communication: on the road to the qinternet,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2024

    2024

  27. [34]

    Nisq quantum computing: A security-centric tutorial and survey [feature],

    F. Chen, L. Jiang, H. M ¨uller, P. Richerme, C. Chu, Z. Fu, and M. Yang, “Nisq quantum computing: A security-centric tutorial and survey [feature],” IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine , vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 14–32, 2024

    2024

  28. [35]

    Chal- lenges and opportunities of near-term quantum computing systems,

    A. D. C ´orcoles, A. Kandala, A. Javadi-Abhari, D. T. McClure, A. W. Cross, K. Temme, P. D. Nation, M. Steffen, and J. M. Gambetta, “Chal- lenges and opportunities of near-term quantum computing systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 108, no. 8, pp. 1338–1352, 2019

    2019

  29. [36]

    Quantum assisted architectures for wireless systems, the case of quantum 6G,

    A. A. Mohammed, A. Bounceur, and M. Hammoudeh, “Quantum assisted architectures for wireless systems, the case of quantum 6G,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems , 2023, pp. 618–625

    2023

  30. [37]

    Role of quantum computing in shaping the future of 6 g technology,

    M. A. Akbar, A. A. Khan, and S. Hyrynsalmi, “Role of quantum computing in shaping the future of 6 g technology,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 170, p. 107454, 2024

    2024

  31. [38]

    In-network quantum computing for future 6g networks,

    H. Urgelles et al. , “In-network quantum computing for future 6g networks,” Advanced Quantum Technologies, p. 2300334, 2024

    2024

  32. [39]

    Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code,

    S. Krinner et al. , “Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code,” Nature, vol. 605, no. 7911, pp. 669–674, 2022

    2022

  33. [40]

    Quantum-computing- based channel and signal modeling for 6g wireless systems,

    A. Farouk, N. A. AbuAli, and S. Mumtaz, “Quantum-computing- based channel and signal modeling for 6g wireless systems,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 64–70, 2024

    2024

  34. [41]

    Security and privacy in 6G networks: New areas and new challenges,

    M. Wang, T. Zhu, T. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Yu, and W. Zhou, “Security and privacy in 6G networks: New areas and new challenges,” Digital Communications and Networks , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 281–291, 2020

    2020

  35. [42]

    Quantum Machine Learning for Per- formance Optimization of RIS-Assisted Communications: Framework Design and Application to Energy Efficiency Maximization of Systems with RSMA,

    B. Narottama and S. A ¨ıssa, “Quantum Machine Learning for Per- formance Optimization of RIS-Assisted Communications: Framework Design and Application to Energy Efficiency Maximization of Systems with RSMA,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , 2024

    2024

  36. [43]

    Quantum Sensors will Start A Revolution—if we Deploy Them Right,

    K. Bongs, S. Bennett, and A. Lohmann, “Quantum Sensors will Start A Revolution—if we Deploy Them Right,” Nature, vol. 617, no. 7962, pp. 672–675, 2023

    2023

  37. [44]

    Quantum Enhanced Time Synchronisation for Communication Network,

    S. S. Nande, M. Paul, S. Senk, M. Ulbricht, R. Bassoli, F. H. Fitzek, and H. Boche, “Quantum Enhanced Time Synchronisation for Communication Network,” Computer Networks , vol. 229, p. 109772, 2023

    2023

  38. [45]

    Quantum machine intelligence for 6g urllc,

    F. Zaman et al. , “Quantum machine intelligence for 6g urllc,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 22–30, 2023

    2023

  39. [46]

    Modeling Interference from Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Bands Cross-links in Low Earth Orbit Satellite Networks for 6G and Beyond,

    S. Aliaga, V . Petrov, and J. M. Jornet, “Modeling Interference from Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Bands Cross-links in Low Earth Orbit Satellite Networks for 6G and Beyond,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , 2024

    2024

  40. [47]

    Qepp: A Quantum Efficient Privacy Protection Protocol in 6G-Quantum Internet of Vehicles,

    Z. Qu, Z. Chen, X. Ning, and P. Tiwari, “Qepp: A Quantum Efficient Privacy Protection Protocol in 6G-Quantum Internet of Vehicles,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2023

    2023

  41. [48]

    Quantum Computing in Telecommunication—a Survey,

    F. Phillipson, “Quantum Computing in Telecommunication—a Survey,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 3423, 2023

    2023

  42. [49]

    Key Technologies, Applications and Trends of Internet of Things for Energy-Efficient 6G Wireless Communication in Smart Cities,

    M. Kamruzzaman, “Key Technologies, Applications and Trends of Internet of Things for Energy-Efficient 6G Wireless Communication in Smart Cities,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 15, p. 5608, 2022

    2022

  43. [50]

    100 Gbps Quantum-Secured and O- RAN-Enabled Programmable Optical Transport Network for 5G Fron- thaul,

    E. Arabul, R. D. Oliveira, A. Emami, S. Typos, C. Vrontos, R. Wang, R. Nejabati, and D. Simeonidou, “100 Gbps Quantum-Secured and O- RAN-Enabled Programmable Optical Transport Network for 5G Fron- thaul,” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking , vol. 15, no. 8, pp. C...

    2023

  44. [51]

    Optimizing the Energy Efficiency Using Quantum based Load Balancing in Open Radio Access Networks,

    Y . Al-Karawi, H. Al-Raweshidy, and R. Nilavalan, “Optimizing the Energy Efficiency Using Quantum based Load Balancing in Open Radio Access Networks,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  45. [52]

    6G Security Vision-A Concise Update,

    G. Gur, P. Porambage, D. M. Osorio, A. A. Yavuz, and M. Liyan- age, “6G Security Vision-A Concise Update,” in 2023 IEEE Future Networks World Forum (FNWF). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–7

    2023

  46. [53]

    Review of Hybrid Optical-Radio Inter-Satellite Links in 6G NTN Including Quantum Security,

    J. Bas and M. Amay, “Review of Hybrid Optical-Radio Inter-Satellite Links in 6G NTN Including Quantum Security,” Optical Wireless Communication Technologies, p. 22, 2023

    2023

  47. [54]

    Machine Learning-Aided Real-Time Optimized Multibeam for 6G Integrated Satellite-Terrestrial Networks: Global Coverage for Mobile Services,

    T. Q. Duong, L. D. Nguyen, T. T. Bui, K. D. Pham, and G. K. Kara- giannidis, “Machine Learning-Aided Real-Time Optimized Multibeam for 6G Integrated Satellite-Terrestrial Networks: Global Coverage for Mobile Services,” IEEE Network, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 86–93, 2023

    2023

  48. [55]

    Quantum Deep Reinforcement Learning for 6G Mobile Wdge Computing-Based IoT Systems,

    J. A. Ansere, T. Q. Duong, S. R. Khosravirad, V . Sharma, A. Masarac- chia, and O. A. Dobre, “Quantum Deep Reinforcement Learning for 6G Mobile Wdge Computing-Based IoT Systems,” in 2023 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 406–411

    2023

  49. [56]

    Secure and Agile 6g Networking–Quantum and AI Enabling Technologies,

    C. R. Garc ´ıa, O. Bouchmal, C. Stan, P. Giannakopoulos, B. Cimoli, J. J. V . Olmos, S. Rommel, and I. T. Monroy, “Secure and Agile 6g Networking–Quantum and AI Enabling Technologies,” in 2023 23rd 28 International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON) . IEEE, 202...

    2023

  50. [57]

    Terabit Optical Wireless Link Design for Inter-Rack Communication in 6G Data Center Networks,

    H. Kazemi, E. Sarbazi, M. Safari, and H. Haas, “Terabit Optical Wireless Link Design for Inter-Rack Communication in 6G Data Center Networks,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1771–1776

    2023

  51. [58]

    Qiotchain: Quantum iot-blockchain fusion for advanced data protec- tion in industry 4.0,

    A. K. Sharma, M. S. Peelam, B. K. Chauasia, and V . Chamola, “Qiotchain: Quantum iot-blockchain fusion for advanced data protec- tion in industry 4.0,” IET Blockchain, 2023

    2023

  52. [59]

    Federated learning with quantum secure aggregation,

    Y . Zhang, C. Zhang, C. Zhang, L. Fan, B. Zeng, and Q. Yang, “Federated learning with quantum secure aggregation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07444, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  53. [60]

    A programmable qudit-based quantum processor,

    Y . Chi et al., “A programmable qudit-based quantum processor,”Nature communications, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1166, 2022

    2022

  54. [61]

    High-performance computing with quantum processing units,

    K. A. Britt and T. S. Humble, “High-performance computing with quantum processing units,” ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (JETC) , vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2017

    2017

  55. [62]

    Ces 2018: Intel’s 49-qubit chip shoots for quantum supremacy,

    J. Hsu, “Ces 2018: Intel’s 49-qubit chip shoots for quantum supremacy,” IEEE Spectrum Tech Talk, pp. 1–6, 2018

    2018

  56. [63]

    IBM quantum breaks the 100-qubit processor barrier,

    J. Chow, O. Dial, and J. Gambetta, “IBM quantum breaks the 100-qubit processor barrier,” IBM Research Blog , 2021

    2021

  57. [64]

    Time Synchronization in Communication Networks: A Comparative Study of Quantum Technologies,

    S. S. Nande, A. Garbugli, R. Bassoli, and F. H. Fitzek, “Time Synchronization in Communication Networks: A Comparative Study of Quantum Technologies,” in 2024 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  58. [65]

    Quantum synchronization on the ibm q system,

    M. Koppenh ¨ofer, C. Bruder, and A. Roulet, “Quantum synchronization on the ibm q system,” Physical Review Research , vol. 2, no. 2, p. 023026, 2020

    2020

  59. [66]

    Demonstration of 50 km fiber-optic two-way quantum clock synchronization,

    H. Hong et al., “Demonstration of 50 km fiber-optic two-way quantum clock synchronization,” Journal of Lightwave Technology , vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3723–3728, 2022

    2022

  60. [67]

    Infleqtion

    Infleqtion TIQKER. Infleqtion. [Accessed: Sep. 2024]. [Online]. Available: https://www.infleqtion.com/tiqker

    2024

  61. [68]

    Experimental realization of secure multiparty quantum summation using five-qubit IBM quan- tum computer on cloud,

    A. Majumder, S. Mohapatra, and A. Kumar, “Experimental realization of secure multiparty quantum summation using five-qubit IBM quan- tum computer on cloud,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.07460 , 2017

    2017 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Khan, Quantum Computing Experimentation with Amazon Braket: Explore Amazon Braket quantum computing to solve combinatorial optimization problems

    A. Khan, Quantum Computing Experimentation with Amazon Braket: Explore Amazon Braket quantum computing to solve combinatorial optimization problems. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2022

    2022

  63. [70]

    Azure quantum,

    J. Hooyberghs and J. Hooyberghs, “Azure quantum,” Introducing Microsoft Quantum Computing for Developers: Using the Quantum Development Kit and Q# , pp. 307–339, 2022

    2022

  64. [71]

    40-user fully connected entanglement-based quantum key distribution network without trusted node,

    X. Liu, J. Liu, R. Xue, H. Wang, H. Li, X. Feng, F. Liu, K. Cui, Z. Wang, L. You et al. , “40-user fully connected entanglement-based quantum key distribution network without trusted node,” PhotoniX, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 2, 2022

    2022

  65. [72]

    Key management systems for large-scale quantum key distribution networks,

    P. James, S. Laschet, S. Ramacher, and L. Torresetti, “Key management systems for large-scale quantum key distribution networks,” inProceed- ings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, 2023, pp. 1–9

    2023

  66. [73]

    Quantum Sensing Can Already Make a Difference. But Where?

    M. Gschwendtner, Y . Bormuth, H. Soller, A. Stein, and R. L. Walsworth, “Quantum Sensing Can Already Make a Difference. But Where?” Journal of Innovation Management , vol. 12, no. 1, 2024

    2024

  67. [74]

    Quantum computing-inspired network optimization for IoT applications,

    M. Bhatia and S. K. Sood, “Quantum computing-inspired network optimization for IoT applications,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 5590–5598, 2020

    2020

  68. [75]

    Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer,

    F. Neukart, G. Compostella, C. Seidel, D. V on Dollen, S. Yarkoni, and B. Parney, “Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer,” Frontiers in ICT, vol. 4, p. 29, 2017

    2017

  69. [76]

    6G Wireless Communications: Security Technologies and Research Challenges,

    H. Chen, K. Tu, J. Li, S. Tang, T. Li, and Z. Qing, “6G Wireless Communications: Security Technologies and Research Challenges,” in 2020 international conference on urban engineering and management science (ICUEMS). IEEE, 2020, pp. 592–595

    2020

  70. [77]

    Enhancing network slicing efficiency in self-organizing networks using quantum computing,

    A. R. Borah, “Enhancing network slicing efficiency in self-organizing networks using quantum computing,” in 2023 4th International Con- ference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 722–726

    2023

  71. [78]

    Quantum computing management of a cloud/edge architecture,

    C. Mastroianni, L. Scarcello, and A. Vinci, “Quantum computing management of a cloud/edge architecture,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers, 2023, pp. 193– 196

    2023

  72. [79]

    K. Pooja. Quantum Computing in Artificial Intelli- gence: Around the Corner. eInfochips. [Accessed: Sep. 2024]. [Online]. Available: https://www.einfochips.com/blog/ quantum-computing-in-artificial-intelligence-around-the-corner/

    2024

  73. [80]

    S. Matt. (2024) Quantum AI Framework Targets Energy- Intensive Data Centers. The Quantum Insider. [Accessed: Sep. 2024]. [Online]. Available: https://thequantuminsider.com/2024/06/03/ quantum-ai-framework-targets-energy-intensive-data-centers/

    2024

  74. [81]

    Towards quantum-native communication systems: New developments, trends, and challenges,

    X. Zhou, A. Shen, S. Hu, W. Ni, X. Wang, E. Hossain, and L. Hanzo, “Towards quantum-native communication systems: New developments, trends, and challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05239 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Quantum computing and machine learning for cybersecurity: Distributed denial of service (ddos) attack detection on smart micro- grid,

    D. Said, “Quantum computing and machine learning for cybersecurity: Distributed denial of service (ddos) attack detection on smart micro- grid,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 3572, 2023

    2023

  76. [83]

    6G Wireless Networks: Vision, Requirements, Architecture, and Key Technologies,

    Z. Zhang, Y . Xiao, Z. Ma, M. Xiao, Z. Ding, X. Lei, G. K. Kara- giannidis, and P. Fan, “6G Wireless Networks: Vision, Requirements, Architecture, and Key Technologies,” IEEE vehicular technology mag- azine, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 28–41, 2019

    2019

  77. [84]

    6G Perspective of Mobile Network Operators, Manufacturers, and Verticals,

    P. Schwenteck, G. T. Nguyen, H. Boche, W. Kellerer, and F. H. Fitzek, “6G Perspective of Mobile Network Operators, Manufacturers, and Verticals,” IEEE Networking Letters , 2023

    2023

  78. [85]

    6G and Beyond: The Future of Wireless Communications Systems,

    I. F. Akyildiz, A. Kak, and S. Nie, “6G and Beyond: The Future of Wireless Communications Systems,” IEEE access, vol. 8, pp. 133 995– 134 030, 2020

    2020

  79. [86]

    A Review Towards AI Empowered 6G Communication Requirements, Applications, and Technologies in Mobile Edge Com- puting,

    A. Bandi, “A Review Towards AI Empowered 6G Communication Requirements, Applications, and Technologies in Mobile Edge Com- puting,” in 2022 6th International Conference on Computing Method- ologies and Communication (ICCMC) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 12–17

    2022

  80. [87]

    Inno- vative Trends in the 6G Era: A Comprehensive Survey of Architecture, Applications, Technologies, and Challenges,

    Q. V . Khanh, A. Chehri, N. M. Quy, N. D. Han, and N. T. Ban, “Inno- vative Trends in the 6G Era: A Comprehensive Survey of Architecture, Applications, Technologies, and Challenges,” IEEE Access, 2023

    2023

  81. [88]

    Potential Enabling Technologies for 6G Mobile Communication Networks: A Recent Review,

    D.-N. Vu, N.-N. Dao, D. Won, and S. Cho, “Potential Enabling Technologies for 6G Mobile Communication Networks: A Recent Review,” in 2023 Fourteenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 631–635

    2023

  82. [89]

    Data-Driven Malware Detection for 6G Networks: A Survey from the Perspective of Continuous Learning and Explainability via Visualisation,

    D. T. Uysal, P. D. Yoo, and K. Taha, “Data-Driven Malware Detection for 6G Networks: A Survey from the Perspective of Continuous Learning and Explainability via Visualisation,” IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, vol. 4, pp. 61–71, 2022

    2022

  83. [90]

    An Overview of Wireless Body Area Networks for Mobile Health Applications,

    B. Cornet, H. Fang, H. Ngo, E. W. Boyer, and H. Wang, “An Overview of Wireless Body Area Networks for Mobile Health Applications,” IEEE Network, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 76–82, 2022

    2022

  84. [91]

    Towards Artificial Intelligence Em- powered Security and Privacy Issues in 6G Communications,

    A. Bandi and S. Yalamarthi, “Towards Artificial Intelligence Em- powered Security and Privacy Issues in 6G Communications,” in 2022 International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICSCDS) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 372–378

    2022

  85. [92]

    Physical-Layer Cryptography Through Massive MIMO,

    T. R. Dean and A. J. Goldsmith, “Physical-Layer Cryptography Through Massive MIMO,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 5419–5436, 2017

    2017

  86. [93]

    MIMO Terahertz Quantum Key Distribution Under Restricted Eavesdropping,

    N. K. Kundu, M. R. McKay, A. Conti, R. K. Mallik, and M. Z. Win, “MIMO Terahertz Quantum Key Distribution Under Restricted Eavesdropping,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering , vol. 4, pp. 1–15, 2023

    2023

  87. [94]

    Millimeter-Waves to Terahertz SISO and MIMO Continuous Variable Quantum Key Dis- tribution,

    M. Zhang, S. Pirandola, and K. Delfanazari, “Millimeter-Waves to Terahertz SISO and MIMO Continuous Variable Quantum Key Dis- tribution,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering , vol. 4, pp. 1–10, 2023

    2023

  88. [95]

    Cooperative Beamforming with Artificial Noise Injection for Physical-Layer Security,

    G. Jang, D. Kim, I.-H. Lee, and H. Jung, “Cooperative Beamforming with Artificial Noise Injection for Physical-Layer Security,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 22 553–22 573, 2023

    2023

  89. [96]

    Joint antenna selection and power allocation for secure co-time co-frequency full-duplex massive mimo systems,

    H. Gao, Y . Su, S. Zhang, Y . Hou, and M. Jo, “Joint antenna selection and power allocation for secure co-time co-frequency full-duplex massive mimo systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 655–665, 2021

    2021

  90. [97]

    Engineering Reflective Metasurfaces With Ising Hamiltonian and Quantum Annealing,

    C. Ross, G. Gradoni, Q. J. Lim, and Z. Peng, “Engineering Reflective Metasurfaces With Ising Hamiltonian and Quantum Annealing,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 2841– 2854, 2022

    2022

  91. [98]

    Flicker Noise (1/f) in 45-nm PDSOI N-Channel FETs at Cryogenic Temperatures for Quantum Computing Applications,

    S. Pathak, S. Gupta, P. Srinivasan, O. H. Gonzalez, F. Guarin, and A. Dixit, “Flicker Noise (1/f) in 45-nm PDSOI N-Channel FETs at Cryogenic Temperatures for Quantum Computing Applications,” IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society , vol. 12, pp. 138–144, 2024

    2024

  92. [99]

    Intelligent Reflecting Surface (IRS) Allocation Scheduling Method Using Combinatorial Optimiza- tion by Quantum Computing,

    T. Ohyama, Y . Kawamoto, and N. Kato, “Intelligent Reflecting Surface (IRS) Allocation Scheduling Method Using Combinatorial Optimiza- tion by Quantum Computing,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1633–1644, 2022

    2022

  93. [100]

    Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Assisted Free Space Optical Quantum Communica- tions,

    N. K. Kundu, M. R. McKay, R. Murch, and R. K. Mallik, “Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Assisted Free Space Optical Quantum Communica- tions,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 5079–5093, 2024. 29

    2024

  94. [101]

    Modular Quantum Machine Learning for Channel Estimation in STAR-RIS Assisted Communication Systems,

    B. Narottama and S. A ¨ıssa, “Modular Quantum Machine Learning for Channel Estimation in STAR-RIS Assisted Communication Systems,” in 2023 IEEE 34th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) , 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  95. [102]

    Trusted Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface for Multi-User Quantum Key Distribution,

    S. Kisseleff and S. Chatzinotas, “Trusted Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface for Multi-User Quantum Key Distribution,” IEEE Communi- cations Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 2237–2241, 2023

    2023

  96. [103]

    Fault-Tolerant Coding for Quantum Communication,

    M. Christandl and A. M ¨uller-Hermes, “Fault-Tolerant Coding for Quantum Communication,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 282–317, 2024

    2024

  97. [104]

    Hybrid Quantum Noise Model to Compute Gaussian Quantum Channel Ca- pacity,

    M. Chakraborty, A. Mukherjee, A. Nag, and S. Chandra, “Hybrid Quantum Noise Model to Compute Gaussian Quantum Channel Ca- pacity,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 14 671–14 689, 2024

    2024

  98. [105]

    Improving Probabilistic Error Cancel- lation in the Presence of Nonstationary Noise,

    S. Dasgupta and T. S. Humble, “Improving Probabilistic Error Cancel- lation in the Presence of Nonstationary Noise,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 1–14, 2024

    2024

  99. [106]

    Quantum Channel Optimization: Integrating Quantum-Inspired Ma- chine Learning With Genetic Adaptive Strategies,

    V . A. Rajasekaran, M. Guru Brahmam, B. Balusamy, and F. Benedetto, “Quantum Channel Optimization: Integrating Quantum-Inspired Ma- chine Learning With Genetic Adaptive Strategies,” IEEE Access , vol. 12, pp. 80 397–80 417, 2024

    2024

  100. [107]

    [Online]

    (May 2022) ”5G/6G Core Networks and Ser- vices”. [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/ 5g6g-core-networks-and-services

    2022

  101. [108]

    Quantum optimization and quantum learning: A survey,

    Y . Li, M. Tian, G. Liu, C. Peng, and L. Jiao, “Quantum optimization and quantum learning: A survey,” Ieee Access , vol. 8, pp. 23 568– 23 593, 2020

    2020

  102. [109]

    Temporal-Spatial Quantum Graph Convolutional Neural Network based on Schr ¨odinger Approach for Traffic Congestion prediction,

    Z. Qu, X. Liu, and M. Zheng, “Temporal-Spatial Quantum Graph Convolutional Neural Network based on Schr ¨odinger Approach for Traffic Congestion prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Trans- portation Systems, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 8677–8686, 2022

    2022

  103. [110]

    Optimization Algorithm of Cognitive Radio Spectrum Sensing based on Quantum Neural Network,

    K. Liu, “Optimization Algorithm of Cognitive Radio Spectrum Sensing based on Quantum Neural Network,” Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 324–331, 2016

    2016

  104. [111]

    Quantum sup- port vector machine based on regularized newton method,

    R. Zhang, J. Wang, N. Jiang, H. Li, and Z. Wang, “Quantum sup- port vector machine based on regularized newton method,” Neural Networks, vol. 151, pp. 376–384, 2022

    2022

  105. [112]

    Spectrum Options and Allocations for 6G: A Regulatory and Standardization Review,

    W. K. Alsaedi, H. Ahmadi, Z. Khan, and D. Grace, “Spectrum Options and Allocations for 6G: A Regulatory and Standardization Review,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , 2023

    2023

  106. [113]

    Enabling efficient real-time calibration on cloud quantum machines,

    Y . Liu, Z. Li, A. Robertson, X. Fu, and S. L. Song, “Enabling efficient real-time calibration on cloud quantum machines,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering , vol. 4, pp. 1–17, 2023

    2023

  107. [114]

    Fault-tolerant control of an error-corrected qubit,

    L. Egan et al. , “Fault-tolerant control of an error-corrected qubit,” Nature, vol. 598, no. 7880, pp. 281–286, 2021

    2021

  108. [115]

    What limits the simulation of quantum computers?

    Y . Zhou, E. M. Stoudenmire, and X. Waintal, “What limits the simulation of quantum computers?” Physical Review X, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 041038, 2020

    2020

  109. [116]

    Practical quantum advantage in quantum simula- tion,

    A. J. Daley et al. , “Practical quantum advantage in quantum simula- tion,” Nature, vol. 607, no. 7920, pp. 667–676, 2022

    2022

  110. [117]

    Quantum simulation,

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, “Quantum simulation,” Reviews of Modern Physics , vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 153–185, 2014

    2014

  111. [118]

    Quantum machine learning for 6G communication networks: State-of-the-art and vision for the future,

    S. J. Nawaz et al., “Quantum machine learning for 6G communication networks: State-of-the-art and vision for the future,” IEEE access , vol. 7, pp. 46 317–46 350, 2019

    2019

  112. [119]

    The concept of a quantum edge simulator: edge computing and sensing in the quantum era,

    A. Passian, G. Buchs, C. M. Seck, A. M. Marino, and N. A. Peters, “The concept of a quantum edge simulator: edge computing and sensing in the quantum era,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 115, 2022

    2022

  113. [120]

    Shaping the future of the application of quantum computing in intelligent transportation system,

    S. Wang, Z. Pei, C. Wang, and J. Wu, “Shaping the future of the application of quantum computing in intelligent transportation system,” Intelligent and Converged Networks , vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 259–276, 2021

    2021

  114. [121]

    Formulating and solving routing problems on quantum computers,

    S. Harwood, C. Gambella, D. Trenev, A. Simonetto, D. Bernal, and D. Greenberg, “Formulating and solving routing problems on quantum computers,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering , vol. 2, pp. 1–17, 2021

    2021

  115. [122]

    Resource- constrained extended reality operated with digital twin in industrial internet of things,

    H. M. Kamdjou, D. Baudry, V . Havard, and S. Ouchani, “Resource- constrained extended reality operated with digital twin in industrial internet of things,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2024

    2024

  116. [123]

    Design of virtual reality browser platform for programming of quantum computers via vr headsets,

    H. H. Genc ¸, S. Aydın, and H. Erdal, “Design of virtual reality browser platform for programming of quantum computers via vr headsets,” in 2020 International congress on human-computer interaction, optimiza- tion and robotic applications (HORA) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–5

    2020

  117. [124]

    Quantum particle swarm optimization for task offloading in mobile edge computing,

    S. Dong, Y . Xia, and J. Kamruzzaman, “Quantum particle swarm optimization for task offloading in mobile edge computing,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 9113–9122, 2022

    2022

  118. [125]

    Identifier-driven resource orchestration with quantum computing for differentiated services in iot-mmec networks,

    Z. Ai, W. Zhang, J. Kang, M. Xu, D. Niyato, and S. J. Turner, “Identifier-driven resource orchestration with quantum computing for differentiated services in iot-mmec networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024

    2024

  119. [126]

    Smart healthcare with hybrid mobile edge-quantum computing: Dynamic computation offloading for latency improvement,

    Z. Ye, Y . Gao, Y . Xiao, M. Xu, H. Yu, and D. Niyato, “Smart healthcare with hybrid mobile edge-quantum computing: Dynamic computation offloading for latency improvement,” in 2023 IEEE 98th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2023-Fall). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  120. [127]

    The impact of quantum computing on security in emerging technologies,

    A. Abuarqoub, S. Abuarqoub, A. Alzu’bi, and A. Muthanna, “The impact of quantum computing on security in emerging technologies,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems , 2021, pp. 171–176

    2021

  121. [128]

    Detection of anomaly in surveillance videos using quantum convolutional neural networks,

    J. Amin et al. , “Detection of anomaly in surveillance videos using quantum convolutional neural networks,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 135, p. 104710, 2023

    2023

  122. [129]

    Quantum computing and lawful interception applications,

    K. Michail-Alexandros, X. George, C. Ioannis, and K. Anastasios, “Quantum computing and lawful interception applications,” in Inter- national Conference on Information Technology & Systems . Springer, 2023, pp. 363–373

    2023

  123. [130]

    Exploring potential applications of quantum computing in transportation modelling,

    C. H. Cooper, “Exploring potential applications of quantum computing in transportation modelling,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Trans- portation Systems, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 14 712–14 720, 2021

    2021

  124. [131]

    Transfer of logistics op- timizations to material flow resource optimizations using quantum computing,

    R. Pfister, G. Schubert, and M. Kr ¨oll, “Transfer of logistics op- timizations to material flow resource optimizations using quantum computing,” Procedia Computer Science , vol. 232, pp. 32–42, 2024

    2024

  125. [132]

    Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet,

    K. Azuma et al. , “Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet,” Reviews of Modern Physics , vol. 95, no. 4, p. 045006, 2023

    2023

  126. [133]

    Experimental demonstration of memory-enhanced scaling for entanglement connection of quantum repeater segments,

    Y .-F. Pu et al. , “Experimental demonstration of memory-enhanced scaling for entanglement connection of quantum repeater segments,” Nature Photonics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 374–378, 2021

    2021

  127. [134]

    Designing quantum repeater networks,

    R. Van Meter and J. Touch, “Designing quantum repeater networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 64–71, 2013

    2013

  128. [135]

    Teleportation-based quantum secure communication using quantum channel compression,

    G. Bebrov and R. Dimova, “Teleportation-based quantum secure communication using quantum channel compression,” The European Physical Journal D , vol. 74, pp. 1–7, 2020

    2020

  129. [136]

    Progress in quantum teleportation,

    X.-M. Hu, Y . Guo, B.-H. Liu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, “Progress in quantum teleportation,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 339– 353, 2023

    2023

  130. [137]

    Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum electrodynamics,

    A. Blais, S. M. Girvin, and W. D. Oliver, “Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum electrodynamics,” Nature Physics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 247–256, 2020

    2020

  131. [138]

    Development of quantum interconnects (quics) for next-generation information technologies,

    D. Awschalom et al., “Development of quantum interconnects (quics) for next-generation information technologies,” Prx Quantum , vol. 2, no. 1, p. 017002, 2021

    2021

  132. [139]

    Experimental transmission of quantum information using a superposition of causal orders,

    Y . Guo et al. , “Experimental transmission of quantum information using a superposition of causal orders,” Physical review letters , vol. 124, no. 3, p. 030502, 2020

    2020

  133. [140]

    Quantum semantic communications for metaverse: Principles and challenges,

    U. Khalid, M. S. Ulum, A. Farooq, T. Q. Duong, O. A. Dobre, and H. Shin, “Quantum semantic communications for metaverse: Principles and challenges,” IEEE Wireless Communications , vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 26–36, 2023

    2023

  134. [141]

    Quantum technologies for the metaverse: Opportunities and challenges,

    M. Chehimi and W. Saad, “Quantum technologies for the metaverse: Opportunities and challenges,” Metaverse Communication and Com- puting Networks: Applications, Technologies, and Approaches , pp. 267–291, 2023

    2023

  135. [142]

    Compar- ing natural language processing and quantum natural processing ap- proaches in text classification tasks,

    D. Peral-Garc ´ıa, J. Cruz-Benito, and F. J. Garc ´ıa-Pe˜nalvo, “Compar- ing natural language processing and quantum natural processing ap- proaches in text classification tasks,” Expert Systems with Applications, p. 124427, 2024

    2024

  136. [143]

    Variational quantum generators: Generative adversarial quantum machine learning for continuous distri- butions,

    J. Romero and A. Aspuru-Guzik, “Variational quantum generators: Generative adversarial quantum machine learning for continuous distri- butions,” Advanced Quantum Technologies, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2000003, 2021

    2021

  137. [144]

    Digital twins based on quantum networking,

    Z. Lv, C. Cheng, and H. Song, “Digital twins based on quantum networking,” IEEE Network, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 88–93, 2022

    2022

  138. [145]

    Digital twin-aided vehicular edge network: A large-scale model optimization by quantum-drl,

    A. Paul, K. Singh, C.-P. Li, O. A. Dobre, and T. Q. Duong, “Digital twin-aided vehicular edge network: A large-scale model optimization by quantum-drl,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024

    2024

  139. [146]

    Digital twin-empowered commu- nications: A new frontier of wireless networks,

    L. Bariah, H. Sari, and M. Debbah, “Digital twin-empowered commu- nications: A new frontier of wireless networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 24–36, 2023

    2023

  140. [147]

    Quantum shuttle: traffic navigation with quantum computing,

    S. Yarkoni et al. , “Quantum shuttle: traffic navigation with quantum computing,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Architectures and Paradigms for Engineering Quantum Software, 2020, pp. 22–30. 30

    2020

  141. [148]

    Quantum key distribution secured optical networks: A survey,

    P. Sharma, A. Agrawal, V . Bhatia, S. Prakash, and A. K. Mishra, “Quantum key distribution secured optical networks: A survey,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 2, pp. 2049–2083, 2021

    2021

  142. [149]

    The evolution of quantum key distribution networks: On the road to the qinternet,

    Y . Cao, Y . Zhao, Q. Wang, J. Zhang, S. X. Ng, and L. Hanzo, “The evolution of quantum key distribution networks: On the road to the qinternet,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 839–894, 2022

    2022

  143. [150]

    Unbreakable distributed storage with quantum key distri- bution network and password-authenticated secret sharing,

    M. Fujiwara, A. Waseda, R. Nojima, S. Moriai, W. Ogata, and M. Sasaki, “Unbreakable distributed storage with quantum key distri- bution network and password-authenticated secret sharing,” Scientific reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 28988, 2016

    2016

  144. [151]

    Security and efficiency of quantum key distribution pro- tocols: A comprehensive review,

    S. Grover, “Security and efficiency of quantum key distribution pro- tocols: A comprehensive review,” Journal of Quantum Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 23–30, 2024

    2024

  145. [152]

    Evaluation of eavesdropping error-rates in higher-dimensional qkd system implemented using dy- namic spatial modes,

    M. Kamran, T. Malik, and M. M. Khan, “Evaluation of eavesdropping error-rates in higher-dimensional qkd system implemented using dy- namic spatial modes,” International Journal of Quantum Information , vol. 19, no. 06, p. 2150030, 2021

    2021

  146. [153]

    Applying qkd to improve next-generation network infrastructures,

    V . Lopez, A. Pastor, D. Lopez, A. Aguado, and V . Martin, “Applying qkd to improve next-generation network infrastructures,” in 2019 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 283–288

    2019

  147. [154]

    Towards european standards for quantum technologies,

    O. van Deventer, N. Spethmann, M. Loeffler, M. Amoretti, R. van den Brink, N. Bruno, P. Comi, N. Farrugia, M. Gramegna, A. Jenet et al., “Towards european standards for quantum technologies,”EPJ Quantum Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 33, 2022

    2022

  148. [155]

    Enabling secure and trustworthy quantum networks: current state-of-the-art, key challenges, and potential solutions,

    S. Bajri ´c, “Enabling secure and trustworthy quantum networks: current state-of-the-art, key challenges, and potential solutions,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 128 801–128 809, 2023

    2023

  149. [156]

    Authentication in virtual private networks based on quantum key distribution methods,

    M. Niemiec and P. Machnik, “Authentication in virtual private networks based on quantum key distribution methods,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 75, pp. 10 691–10 707, 2016

    2016

  150. [157]

    Security at the internet layer,

    R. Oppliger, “Security at the internet layer,” Computer, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 43–47, 1998

    1998

  151. [158]

    An approach to securing ipsec with quantum key distribution (qkd) using the ait qkd software,

    S. Marksteiner, “An approach to securing ipsec with quantum key distribution (qkd) using the ait qkd software,” 2014

    2014

  152. [159]

    Open-ran fronthaul transport security architecture and implementation,

    D. Dik and M. S. Berger, “Open-ran fronthaul transport security architecture and implementation,” IEEE Access , vol. 11, pp. 46 185– 46 203, 2023

    2023

  153. [160]

    Leveraging quantum key distribution for securing macsec communications,

    D. Lyssenko and O. Komolafe, “Leveraging quantum key distribution for securing macsec communications,” in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Quantum Networks and Distributed Quantum Computing, 2023, pp. 57–61

    2023

  154. [161]

    Using qkd in macsec for secure ethernet networks,

    J. Y . Cho and A. Sergeev, “Using qkd in macsec for secure ethernet networks,” IET Quantum Communication , vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 66–73, 2021

    2021

  155. [162]

    Quantum-resistant macsec and ipsec for virtual private networks,

    S.-L. Gazdag et al. , “Quantum-resistant macsec and ipsec for virtual private networks,” in International Conference on Research in Security Standardisation. Springer, 2023, pp. 1–21

    2023

  156. [163]

    Quantum secure direct communication and deterministic secure quantum communication,

    G.-l. Long, F.-g. Deng, C. Wang, X.-h. Li, K. Wen, and W.-y. Wang, “Quantum secure direct communication and deterministic secure quantum communication,” Frontiers of Physics in China , vol. 2, pp. 251–272, 2007

    2007

  157. [164]

    26g internet for intelligent of things,

    D. Dabas, P. S. Mehra, D. Chawla, J. Sharma, and A. Jamshed, “26g internet for intelligent of things,” Network Optimization in Intelligent Internet of Things Applications: Principles and Challenges , p. 19, 2024

    2024

  158. [165]

    D. A. Lidar and T. A. Brun, Quantum error correction . Cambridge university press, 2013

    2013

  159. [166]

    1/f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information,

    E. Paladino, Y . Galperin, G. Falci, and B. Altshuler, “1/f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 361–418, 2014

    2014

  160. [167]

    A survey on security of ultra/hyper reliable low latency communication: Recent advancements, challenges, and future directions,

    A. Pradhan, S. Das, M. J. Piran, and Z. Han, “A survey on security of ultra/hyper reliable low latency communication: Recent advancements, challenges, and future directions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.08160 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  161. [168]

    Theory of quantum error-correcting codes,

    E. Knill and R. Laflamme, “Theory of quantum error-correcting codes,” Physical Review A , vol. 55, no. 2, p. 900, 1997

    1997

  162. [169]

    Quantum error correction,

    T. A. Brun, “Quantum error correction,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03672, 2019

    1910 arXiv

  163. [170]

    Hybrid quantum- classical algorithms and quantum error mitigation,

    S. Endo, Z. Cai, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, “Hybrid quantum- classical algorithms and quantum error mitigation,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , vol. 90, no. 3, p. 032001, 2021

    2021

  164. [171]

    Entanglement purification and quantum error correction,

    W. D ¨ur and H. J. Briegel, “Entanglement purification and quantum error correction,” Reports on Progress in Physics , vol. 70, no. 8, p. 1381, 2007

    2007

  165. [172]

    Fault-tolerant quantum communication based on solid-state photon emitters,

    L. Childress, J. Taylor, A. S. Sørensen, and M. Lukin, “Fault-tolerant quantum communication based on solid-state photon emitters,” Physi- cal review letters, vol. 96, no. 7, p. 070504, 2006

    2006

  166. [173]

    Improving the speed of variational quantum algo- rithms for quantum error correction,

    F. Zoratti et al. , “Improving the speed of variational quantum algo- rithms for quantum error correction,” Physical Review A , vol. 108, no. 2, p. 022611, 2023

    2023

  167. [174]

    Quantum cryptography in 5g networks: a compre- hensive overview,

    M. Mehic et al. , “Quantum cryptography in 5g networks: a compre- hensive overview,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2023

    2023

  168. [175]

    Recent advances in post-quantum cryptography for networks: A survey,

    E. Zeydan et al., “Recent advances in post-quantum cryptography for networks: A survey,” in 2022 Seventh International Conference On Mobile And Secure Services (MobiSecServ) , 2022, pp. 1–8

    2022

  169. [177]

    Quantum computing—from nisq to pisq,

    K. Bertels, A. Sarkar, and I. Ashraf, “Quantum computing—from nisq to pisq,” IEEE Micro, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 24–32, 2021

    2021

  170. [178]

    Testing and debugging quantum circuits,

    S. A. Metwalli and R. Van Meter, “Testing and debugging quantum circuits,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering , 2024

    2024

  171. [179]

    Ibm quantum breaks the 100-qubit processor barrier,

    “Ibm quantum breaks the 100-qubit processor barrier,” 2023, accessed on 20.08.2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/quantum/ blog/127-qubit-quantum-processor-eagle

    2023

  172. [180]

    Real-time quantum error correction beyond break- even,

    V . Sivak et al. , “Real-time quantum error correction beyond break- even,” Nature, vol. 616, no. 7955, pp. 50–55, 2023

    2023

  173. [181]

    Quantum technologies and standardization,

    T. Mazur, “Quantum technologies and standardization,” Strategic Per- pectives on Cybersecurity Management and Public Policies , p. 34, 2018

    2018

  174. [182]

    Concurrent entanglement routing for quantum networks: Model and designs,

    S. Shi and C. Qian, “Concurrent entanglement routing for quantum networks: Model and designs,” inProceedings of the Annual conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication on the applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communicat...

    2020

  175. [183]

    Fidelity of quantum teleportation in correlated quantum channels,

    Y .-n. Guo, Q.-l. Tian, K. Zeng, and P.-x. Chen, “Fidelity of quantum teleportation in correlated quantum channels,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 182, 2020

    2020

  176. [184]

    Quantum communication systems: vision, protocols, applications, and chal- lenges,

    S. R. Hasan, M. Z. Chowdhury, M. Saiam, and Y . M. Jang, “Quantum communication systems: vision, protocols, applications, and chal- lenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 15 855–15 877, 2023

    2023

  177. [185]

    A survey on network slicing security: Attacks, challenges, solutions and research directions,

    C. De Alwis, P. Porambage, K. Dev, T. R. Gadekallu, and M. Liyanage, “A survey on network slicing security: Attacks, challenges, solutions and research directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2023

    2023

  178. [186]

    Robust video communication using random linear network coding with pre-coding and interleaving,

    C. de Alwis, H. K. Arachchi, V . De Silva, A. Fernando, and A. Kondoz, “Robust video communication using random linear network coding with pre-coding and interleaving,” in 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing . IEEE, 2012, pp. 2269–2272

    2012

  179. [187]

    Quantum annealing: An overview,

    A. Rajak, S. Suzuki, A. Dutta, and B. K. Chakrabarti, “Quantum annealing: An overview,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 381, no. 2241, p. 20210417, 2023

    2023

  180. [188]

    Quantum-assisted routing optimization for self-organizing networks,

    D. Alanis, P. Botsinis, S. X. Ng, and L. Hanzo, “Quantum-assisted routing optimization for self-organizing networks,”IEEE Access, vol. 2, pp. 614–632, 2014

    2014

  181. [189]

    Optimization of Resource Allocation using Quantum Genetic Algorithm for Cloud Data,

    V . Dani, S. Kushwah, and P. Kokate, “Optimization of Resource Allocation using Quantum Genetic Algorithm for Cloud Data,” in 2021 Fifth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 883–888

    2021

  182. [190]

    Quantum computing-inspired optimal power allocation mechanism in edge computing environment,

    M. Bhatia and S. Sood, “Quantum computing-inspired optimal power allocation mechanism in edge computing environment,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2024

    2024

  183. [191]

    Ibm’s roadmap for scaling quantum technology,

    J. Gambetta, “Ibm’s roadmap for scaling quantum technology,” IBM Research Blog (September 2020) , 2020

    2020

  184. [192]

    Hybrid quantum-classical computing for future network optimization,

    L. Fan and Z. Han, “Hybrid quantum-classical computing for future network optimization,” IEEE Network, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 72–76, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.