Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 68 references

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Single Organic Radicals with Sub-Molecular Resolution

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ESR-STM now images the unpaired-electron spin density of single organic radicals with sub-molecular resolution.

desk verdict Genuinely new experimental data, but the 'spin-density tomography' claim is ahead of the evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18043 v1 pith:P6AR4QC7 submitted 2025-04-25 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.otherphysics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph

Gregory Czap , Christoph Wolf , Jose Reina-Gálvez , Mark H. Sherwood , Christopher P. Lutz This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.otherphysics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords ESR-STMmagneticresonanceimagingspindensityorganicradicalsfluorenoneexchangeinteractionsub-molecularresolutionSOMO
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that electron spin resonance scanning tunneling microscopy (ESR-STM) can image the spatial distribution of the unpaired electron in single organic radical anions with sub-molecular resolution. On fluorene-derived anions adsorbed on a two-monolayer MgO film, the magnetic tip's highly localized exchange field creates narrow resonant-slice rings that trace constant tip-molecule interaction around lobes of high spin density. Because the rings depend on tip height and frequency, a sequence of images amounts to three-dimensional spin-density tomography that can tell structurally similar molecules apart. The authors argue this opens a route to atomic-scale visualization of spin density and magnetic interactions in organic systems such as nanographenes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the exchange interaction between the magnetic tip apex and the molecular spin, approximated as nearly isotropic and proportional to the overlap between the tip's spin and each spin lobe. Scanning at fixed RF frequency, the ESR signal appears only where the lateral tip position makes the tip field shift the spin resonance into the drive frequency; the observed rings are the intersection of the scan plane with a constant-exchange-energy isosurface. The SOMO/SUMO cotunneling dichotomy is the second mechanism: which orbital dominates tunneling at a given lateral position sets the sign of the magnetoresistive ESR signal, and spin-torque initialization accounts for the bias-dependent reversal.

What would settle it

Perform the same MRI sequence on a radical whose high-spin-density lobe has zero SOMO wavefunction amplitude at the tip position or is surrounded by opposite-phase lobes: a purely spin-density map would still ring there, while phase-dependent exchange would not. Alternatively, rotate a single adsorbed molecule by 90 degrees on the surface and check whether the resonant-slice positions track the fixed spin-density lobes or shift with the molecular orientation relative to the tip's crystal axes; a shift would indicate anisotropic exchange rather than isotropic spin-density mapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a magnetic STM tip's exchange field can serve as a sub-molecular probe of a delocalized radical's spin density. ESR spectra of three fluorene-derived radical anions on MgO/Ag(001) show spin $S=1/2$ resonances with $g\approx 1.97$ to $1.98$, and scanning the tip at fixed RF frequency produces narrow resonant-slice rings that enclose the density-functional-theory (DFT) predicted high-spin-density lobes of the anion's singly occupied molecular orbital (SOMO). Sequences taken at different frequencies or tip heights map the same interaction isosurface in three dimensions, so the molecules' adsorption tilt and distortion become visible: DAF shows the first ring at the ketone-carbon lobe, fluorenone at the opposite lobe. The paper also accounts for missing contrast at one high-density lobe by wavefunction-phase cancellation of the exchange integral and for light/dark contrast reversal by switching between SOMO and SUMO cotunneling channels, with spin-torque initialization flipping the overall contrast at negative bias.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the tip-molecule exchange interaction is nearly isotropic and grows with the overlap between the tip spin and each spin-density lobe, so that the position of a resonant slice is a direct readout of spin-density magnitude.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ESR-STM MRI can distinguish closely related organic radicals that look identical in STM topography, using only their spin-density distribution and three-dimensional adsorption geometry.
  • The method gives a direct three-dimensional map of where a delocalized spin resides, so it can guide tip placement for coherent spin driving and sensing on individual molecules.
  • The combination of neV energy resolution and atomic spatial resolution lets MRI detect differences in molecular tilt and distortion at the picometer scale.
  • Applied to nanographenes and graphene nanoribbons, the same exchange-field imaging should expose the spatial structure of edge-state spins and intramolecular spin coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the isotropic-overlap picture holds, the same resonant-slice technique could image spin-density sign, not just magnitude, because negative-spin-density regions suppress the exchange integral; the paper's site-D result hints at this but does not claim it.
  • The SOMO/SUMO contrast reversal suggests MRI could be used as an orbital-selective probe: by tuning bias and tip gating, the same physical spin density might be imaged through either orbital, mapping SOMO and SUMO wavefunctions separately.
  • A quantitative test that follows from the paper's model is that ring radius versus tip-height curves at fixed RF detuning should collapse onto one exchange-field isosurface; if they do not, the assumed isotropic-overlap model needs revision.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports electron spin resonance (ESR) and scanning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements on individual all-organic radical anions (DAF, fluorenone, DBF) adsorbed on a 2-ML MgO film on Ag(001). The authors observe ESR peaks with g-factors near 2, and MRI images that show ring-shaped resonant slices whose size and position change with RF frequency and tip height. They compare these rings with DFT-computed spin densities of the molecular anions, and use DFT-optimized adsorption geometries to explain differences between DAF and fluorenone. A non-equilibrium transport model with a single Anderson impurity is used to simulate bias-dependent ESR spectra. The paper claims that the MRI rings map the delocalized spin density with sub-molecular resolution, enabling spin-density tomography that distinguishes similar molecular species.

Significance. If the central interpretation is correct, this work extends ESR-STM to all-organic radicals and demonstrates a real-space probe of delocalized molecular spins, which is of considerable interest for molecular magnetism, nanographene spins, and spin-based electronics. The experiments appear carefully conducted, and the observation of frequency- and height-dependent resonant slices on molecular radical anions is a substantial technical advance. However, the step from ring positions to a quantitative spin-density map is not established. The paper's own discussion of site-D introduces phase-dependent and nonlocal exchange contributions that conflict with the simple 'exchange proportional to spin-density overlap' assumption. The text also explicitly states that Supplementary Materials are unavailable, which limits reproducibility. The qualitative visual comparison to DFT is compelling but not a quantitative tomography. The central claim is therefore defensible only in a weakened form, and the manuscript requires substantial revision to justify the tomography language.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results, paragraph after Fig. 4] The assumption that 'the exchange interaction between the tip and molecule is nearly isotropic and with a magnitude proportional to the overlap between the tip spin and each spin lobe' is contradicted by the two explanations given in the same paragraph for the missing site-D signal. First, negative spin density at the N atoms (DAF) or corresponding carbons (fluorenone) is said to 'reduce the total exchange integral'; second, the exchange integral is said to depend on the wavefunction phase, with opposite-phase SOMO lobes around site D canceling. Both statements imply that the observed rings encode a phase-sensitive, nonlocal exchange matrix element, not the local magnitude of the spin density. Since the tomographic claim relies on the proportionality assumption, the paper needs either a quantitative relation between ring radii/positions and spin density or an explicit model that accounts for phase and nonlocality. As written, the abstract's 'spin-density tomography' claim is not supported.
  2. [Results, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4] The MRI sequences are not tomographic in the standard sense: each image is a 2D slice of a constant tip-molecule interaction isosurface, not a direct map of spin density at that height. The paper acknowledges this in Fig. 3A,B but then refers to 'spin-density tomography' without performing an inversion. The comparison to DFT spin density (Fig. 3G,M and Fig. 4D,H) is purely visual; no quantitative metric (e.g., correlation, RMS deviation, or a fitted interaction model) is provided. A load-bearing component of the central claim is therefore missing.
  3. [Supplementary Materials statement] The manuscript states that 'Supplementary Materials (SM) are not available for this version of this manuscript.' However, the text refers to the SM for essential technical details: high-pass filtering of MRI images (Fig. 3 caption), detailed transport-model discussions (Results), the spin-torque mechanism for negative-bias contrast reversal (Results), and the site-dependent ESR signal reversal (Results). Without these materials, readers cannot verify the image processing, the model assumptions, or the proposed mechanisms. This is a reproducibility concern that must be resolved before publication.
  4. [Results, transport model paragraph] The transport model is used to support the bias-dependent ESR interpretation, but the simulation 'reproduces most of the main features' and explicitly fails to capture the contrast inversion at site B. The fit parameters include the ionization energy ε, Hubbard U, tip coupling Γ_tip, tip polarization P, RF driving amplitude, and temperature; the paper states that ε, U, and Γ_tip are fitted from the ESR resonance position using exchange-field theory. Given the number of adjusted parameters and the model's failure at site B, the transport-model section should be framed as illustrative rather than as a quantitative validation of the experimental interpretation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 1 caption vs. text] The text states that CO-tip itProbe images were acquired of 'fluorenyl and DAF,' but the Fig. 1 caption describes panels (E,F) as 'fluorenone (E) and DAF (F).' This inconsistency should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 2 and Results] The quoted g-factors, 1.97 ± 0.04 and 1.98 ± 0.03, have large uncertainties. It would be helpful to state how many measurements and tip apexes contribute to these values, and to report the confidence intervals more explicitly.
  3. [Results, tip dependence] The phrase 'For most tips tested' appears three times without a number. Please give the total number of distinct tip apexes and how many exhibited the stated behavior.
  4. [Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 captions] The MRI images are described as 'high-pass filtered for clarity (see SM).' Since the SM is unavailable, the filter type, cutoff, and any artifacts should be described in the main text or a footnote.
  5. [References] Reference 19 lacks volume and page numbers (it is given as 'acsnano.4c14327'). Reference 52 is an unpublished manuscript; if it is not yet accepted, please provide a preprint identifier or remove it from the reference list.
  6. [Results, contrast reversal paragraph] The paragraph on contrast reversal proposes three distinct mechanisms (SOMO/SUMO channel switching, tip gating, and spin-torque initialization). To avoid the appearance of ad hoc explanation, please clearly label which parts are directly supported by data and which are hypotheses, and consider consolidating the discussion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Supporting transport model fits parameters to the resonance-position observable it then 'reproduces'; central MRI-to-spin-density comparison is independent of the fit.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods, 'Transport model for ESR spectra'; Results, 'Effects of bias voltage and orbital properties on ESR image contrast' (Fig. 5E,F)]
    "As shown in Fig. 5E, F, the simulation reproduces most of the main features seen in the measurements, including the trends in both peak amplitude and frequency shift as a function of the bias voltage."

    The model parameters are not independently fixed: the Methods state 'with this value we fit ε, U and the coupling to the tip from ESR resonance position using the exchange field theory in references (67, 52, 68).' Since the ESR resonance position is the same bias-dependent observable reported as the simulated frequency shift, the model's bias-dependent frequency-shift 'reproduction' is a restatement of the fitted constraint, not an independent prediction. The exchange-field theory used for the fit is partly self-cited (refs. 52 and 68 are by the present authors), compounding the reduction. The circularity is confined to this supporting transport simulation; the MRI ring comparison with DFT spin density does not use these fitted parameters.

full rationale

The central MRI-to-spin-density claim is not circular: the resonant-slice rings are measured at fixed RF frequency, and their comparison with DFT-calculated spin density (Figs. 3G,M and 4D,H) is an external, falsifiable check rather than a fit to the DFT input. The assumption that the exchange interaction is 'nearly isotropic and with a magnitude proportional to the overlap between the tip spin and each spin lobe' is an explicit interpretive ansatz, and the paper's own site-D phase-cancellation argument is an internal-consistency caveat, but neither makes the measured rings a restatement of the calculated spin density. The one genuine reduction is in the supporting transport model of Fig. 5: ε, U, and tip coupling are fitted from the ESR resonance position using an exchange-field theory that includes self-citations (refs. 52, 68), and the model is then said to 'reproduce' the bias-dependent frequency shift—an observable closely tied to the fitted quantity. This is a partial fitted-input-called-prediction, but it does not bear on the central spin-density imaging claim. The manuscript also notes 'Supplementary Materials (SM) are not available for this version,' which limits cross-checking of filtering and transport details but is a completeness issue, not circularity. Accordingly the score is 4 rather than higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. Its scientific payload is a set of measurements and models built on standard DFT and transport theory. The main assumptions are that DFT spin densities represent the adsorbed molecules' true spin distribution, that the molecules charge to anions, and that the tip-molecule exchange field is isotropic and proportional to local spin-density overlap. The transport model has several hand-set or fitted parameters, but they are used for secondary bias-dependence simulations rather than for the core MRI claim.

free parameters (6)
  • Transport model ionization energy ε = -1.22 eV
    Fit to the measured ESR resonance position using exchange field theory, as stated in Methods: 'with this value we fit ε, U and the coupling to the tip from ESR resonance position'.
  • Hubbard U = 2.44 eV (= -2ε)
    Set as -2ε by assumption, derived from the fitted ε rather than measured independently.
  • Tip coupling Γ_tip = 14 μeV
    Fit from the ESR resonance position in the transport model; substrate coupling is set to three times this value.
  • Tip polarization P = 0.5
    Chosen by hand in the transport simulation; no independent calibration.
  • RF driving amplitude = 25% of tip coupling
    Set in the simulation to match typical experimental driving conditions.
  • Simulation temperature = 0.5 K
    Set lower than the experimental 1.1 K; a modeling choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Density functional theory (B3LYP/6-31++G for gas phase, plane-wave rVV10 for slabs) gives accurate spin densities of the molecular anions.
    Used to assign MRI ring patterns to spin-density lobes A, B, C, D, and E in Figs. 3 and 4.
  • domain assumption The adsorbed molecules spontaneously form radical anions by charge transfer from the Ag substrate.
    Supported by DFT and by the observation that closed-shell neutral molecules show S = 1/2 behavior in IETS and ESR.
  • ad hoc to paper The tip-molecule exchange interaction is nearly isotropic and proportional to the overlap of the tip spin with the molecule's spin density.
    This is the central mapping from MRI ring positions to spin-density lobes; stated as an expectation, not derived. The paper's phase-cancellation explanation for site D shows the mapping is not a simple local spin-density magnitude.
  • domain assumption RF-driven ESR in the tunnel current is described by an Anderson impurity model with barrier modulation.
    Used for the bias-dependent ESR simulations (Fig. 5E,F), following refs 50 and 52.
  • domain assumption Tip electrostatic gating shifts molecular orbital levels relative to the Fermi level, switching the dominant tunneling between SOMO and SUMO channels.
    Invoked to explain the contrast reversal at site B and the bias-voltage dependence of the MRI contrast.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Single Organic Radicals with Sub-Molecular Resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P6AR4QC7

@misc{pith2026250418043,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Single Organic Radicals with Sub-Molecular Resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P6AR4QC7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18043}
}
read the original abstract

Interest in the magnetism of organic compounds is growing because of new organic magnets, spin-based electronics and the diverse properties of magnetic edge states in graphene nanoribbons. Electron spin resonance spectroscopy combined with the scanning tunneling microscopy has recently been developed as a powerful tool to address individual magnetic atoms and molecules at the atomic scale. Here we demonstrate electron spin resonance and magnetic resonance imaging of all-organic radical anions adsorbed on a protective thin insulating film grown on a metal support. We show that using the highly localized exchange field of the magnetic tip apex allows visualization of the delocalized spin density with sub-molecular resolution, enabling spin-density tomography that can distinguish similar molecular species. These results provide new opportunities for visualizing spin density and magnetic interactions at the atomic scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.18043 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Some tips (such as the one used in Fig. 2) gave shifts to lower frequency as the tip was [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Organic molecules probed by STM. (A) Schematic diagram depicting the ESR￾STM experiment, where molecules are adsorbed on a thin epitaxial MgO film. (B) Chemical structure diagrams and corresponding STM topographs of the molecular species studied in this work: (1) 4,5-diazafluorenone (DAF), (2) 9-fluorenone, (3) 2,7-dibromo-9-fluorenone (DBF), (4) 9-bromo-fluorene with dissociation products shown, and (5) 9-fluorenyl… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. ESR spectra of diazafluorenone (DAF). (A–C) Tunnel-current STM images of DAF acquired at constant tip height. Images are centered on three representative sites (colored circles). Tip height was established with tip positioned over molecule center with setpoint Iset = 80 pA at Vset = 50 mV before opening the constant-current feedback loop. (D–F) ESR spectra acquired with tip positioned at the respective sites shown i… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Scanning magnetic resonance images (MRI) of DAF and fluorenone. (A) Diagram of Scheme 1 for MRI sequences, in which the tip-surface distance is held constant and the RF frequency f is varied between successive MRI images. This results in images that probe different tip…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: DFT calculations of adsorbed DAF and fluorenone. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effects of bias voltage and orbital properties on ESR image contrast. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. A. Weil, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Elementary Theory and Practical Applications (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, N.J, 2nd ed., 2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Coronado, Molecular magnetism: from chemical design to spin control in molecules, materials and devices

    E. Coronado, Molecular magnetism: from chemical design to spin control in molecules, materials and devices. Nat Rev Mater 5, 87–104 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    X. Lu, S. Lee, J. O. Kim, T. Y. Gopalakrishna, H. Phan, T. S. Herng, Z. Lim, Z. Zeng, J. Ding, D. Kim, J. Wu, Stable 3,6-Linked Fluorenyl Radical Oligomers with Intramolecular Antiferromagnetic Coupling and Polyradical Characters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 13048–13058 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    K. Sun, N. Cao, O. J. Silveira, A. O. Fumega, F. Hanindita, S. Ito, J. L. Lado, P. Liljeroth, A. S. Foster, S. Kawai, On-surface synthesis of Heisenberg spin-1/2 antiferromagnetic molecular chains. Sci. Adv. 11, eads1641 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Lombardi, A

    F. Lombardi, A. Lodi, J. Ma, J. Liu, M. Slota, A. Narita, W. K. Myers, K. Müllen, X. Feng, L. Bogani, Quantum units from the topological engineering of molecular graphenoids. Science 366, 1107– 1110 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    D. G. De Oteyza, T. Frederiksen, Carbon-based nanostructures as a versatile platform for tunable π-magnetism. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34, 443001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Brede, N

    J. Brede, N. Merino-Díez, A. Berdonces-Layunta, S. Sanz, A. Domínguez-Celorrio, J. Lobo-Checa, M. Vilas-Varela, D. Peña, T. Frederiksen, J. I. Pascual, D. G. De Oteyza, D. Serrate, Detecting the spin-polarization of edge states in graphene nanoribbons. Nat Commun 14, 6677 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Mishra, D

    S. Mishra, D. Beyer, K. Eimre, S. Kezilebieke, R. Berger, O. Gröning, C. A. Pignedoli, K. Müllen, P. Liljeroth, P. Ruffieux, X. Feng, R. Fasel, Topological frustration induces unconventional magnetism in a nanographene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 22–28 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    C. Zhao, L. Yang, J. C. G. Henriques, M. Ferri-Cortés, G. Catarina, C. A. Pignedoli, J. Ma, X. Feng, P. Ruffieux, J. Fernández-Rossier, R. Fasel, Spin excitations in nanographene-based antiferromagnetic spin-1/2 Heisenberg chains. Nat. Mater., doi: 10.1038/s41563-025-02166-1 (2025)

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    U. Ham, W. Ho, Imaging single electron spin in a molecule trapped within a nanocavity of tunable dimension. The Journal of Chemical Physics 138, 074703 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    L. L. Patera, S. Sokolov, J. Z. Low, L. M. Campos, L. Venkataraman, J. Repp, Resolving the Unpaired-Electron Orbital Distribution in a Stable Organic Radical by Kondo Resonance Mapping. Angew Chem Int Ed 58, 11063–11067 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Baumann, W

    S. Baumann, W. Paul, T. Choi, C. P. Lutz, A. Ardavan, A. J. Heinrich, Electron paramagnetic resonance of individual atoms on a surface. Science 350, 417–420 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    K. Yang, W. Paul, S.-H. Phark, P. Willke, Y. Bae, T. Choi, T. Esat, A. Ardavan, A. J. Heinrich, C. P. Lutz, Coherent spin manipulation of individual atoms on a surface. Science 366, 509–512 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Y. Chen, Y. Bae, A. J. Heinrich, Harnessing the Quantum Behavior of Spins on Surfaces. Advanced Materials 35, 2107534 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    T. S. Seifert, S. Kovarik, D. M. Juraschek, N. A. Spaldin, P. Gambardella, S. Stepanow, Longitudinal and transverse electron paramagnetic resonance in a scanning tunneling microscope. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc5511 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Zhang, C

    X. Zhang, C. Wolf, Y. Wang, H. Aubin, T. Bilgeri, P. Willke, A. J. Heinrich, T. Choi, Electron spin resonance of single iron phthalocyanine molecules and role of their non-localized spins in magnetic interactions. Nat. Chem. 14, 59–65 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Kovarik, R

    S. Kovarik, R. Robles, R. Schlitz, T. S. Seifert, N. Lorente, P. Gambardella, S. Stepanow, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Alkali Metal Atoms and Dimers on Ultrathin MgO. Nano Lett. 22, 4176–4181 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Reale, J

    S. Reale, J. Hwang, J. Oh, H. Brune, A. J. Heinrich, F. Donati, Y. Bae, Electrically driven spin resonance of 4f electrons in a single atom on a surface. Nat Commun 15, 5289 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    G. Czap, K. Noh, J. Velasco, R. M. Macfarlane, H. Brune, C. P. Lutz, Direct Electrical Access to the Spin Manifolds of Individual Lanthanide Atoms. ACS Nano, acsnano.4c14327 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    S. N. Datta, A. K. Pal, A. Panda, Design of magnetic organic molecules and organic magnets: Experiment, theory and computation with application and recent advances. Chemical Physics Impact 7, 100379 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Kawaguchi, K

    R. Kawaguchi, K. Hashimoto, T. Kakudate, K. Katoh, M. Yamashita, T. Komeda, Spatially Resolving Electron Spin Resonance of PI-Radical in Single-Molecule Magnet. Nano Letters 23, 213–219 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    T. Esat, D. Borodin, J. Oh, A. J. Heinrich, F. S. Tautz, Y. Bae, R. Temirov, A quantum sensor for atomic-scale electric and magnetic fields. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 1466–1471 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Kovarik, R

    S. Kovarik, R. Schlitz, A. Vishwakarma, D. Ruckert, P. Gambardella, S. Stepanow, Spin torque– driven electron paramagnetic resonance of a single spin in a pentacene molecule. Science 384, 1368–1373 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Sellies, R

    L. Sellies, R. Spachtholz, S. Bleher, J. Eckrich, P. Scheuerer, J. Repp, Single-molecule electron spin resonance by means of atomic force microscopy. Nature 624, 64–68 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    W. Paul, K. Yang, S. Baumann, N. Romming, T. Choi, C. P. Lutz, A. J. Heinrich, Control of the millisecond spin lifetime of an electrically probed atom. Nature Phys 13, 403–407 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    A. Atto, A. Hudson, R. A. Jackson, N. P. C. Simmons, ESR of Fluorenyl and Identyl: Two Neutral Non-Alternant Radicals. Chem. Phys. Lett. 33, 477 (1975)

    1975

  19. [27]

    D. R. Dalton, S. A. Liebman, Electron spin resonance studies on neutral aromatic hydrocarbon radicals. Journal of the American Chemical Society (1969)

    1969

  20. [28]

    Y. Tian, K. Uchida, H. Kurata, Y. Hirao, T. Nishiuchi, T. Kubo, Design and Synthesis of New Stable Fluorenyl-Based Radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12784–12793 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Mishra, S

    S. Mishra, S. Fatayer, S. Fernández, K. Kaiser, D. Peña, L. Gross, Nonbenzenoid High-Spin Polycyclic Hydrocarbons Generated by Atom Manipulation. ACS Nano 16, 3264–3271 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    S. Song, N. Guo, X. Li, G. Li, Y. Haketa, M. Telychko, J. Su, P. Lyu, Z. Qiu, H. Fang, X. Peng, J. Li, X. Wu, Y. Li, C. Su, M. J. Koh, J. Wu, H. Maeda, C. Zhang, J. Lu, Real-Space Imaging of a Single- Molecule Monoradical Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 13550–13557 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    R. S. Klausen, J. R. Widawsky, T. A. Su, H. Li, Q. Chen, M. L. Steigerwald, L. Venkataraman, C. Nuckolls, Evaluating atomic components in fluorene wires. Chem. Sci. 5, 1561 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Pacchioni, H

    G. Pacchioni, H. Freund, Electron Transfer at Oxide Surfaces. The MgO Paradigm: from Defects to Ultrathin Films. Chem. Rev. 113, 4035–4072 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Willke, K

    P. Willke, K. Yang, Y. Bae, A. J. Heinrich, C. P. Lutz, Magnetic resonance imaging of single atoms on a surface. Nat. Phys. 15, 1005–1010 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    H. K. Fun, K. Sivakumar, D. R. Zhu, X. Z. You, 4,5-Diazafluoren-9-one. Acta Crystallogr C Cryst Struct Commun 51, 2076–2078 (1995)

    1995

  27. [35]

    Chiang, C

    C. Chiang, C. Xu, Z. Han, W. Ho, Real-space imaging of molecular structure and chemical bonding by single-molecule inelastic tunneling probe. Science 344, 885–888 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Z. Han, G. Czap, C. Chiang, C. Xu, P. J. Wagner, X. Wei, Y. Zhang, R. Wu, W. Ho, Imaging the halogen bond in self-assembled halogenbenzenes on silver. Science 358, 206–210 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Gross, F

    L. Gross, F. Mohn, N. Moll, P. Liljeroth, G. Meyer, The Chemical Structure of a Molecule Resolved by Atomic Force Microscopy. Science 325, 1110–1114 (2009)

    2009

  30. [38]

    Hapala, G

    P. Hapala, G. Kichin, C. Wagner, F. S. Tautz, R. Temirov, P. Jelínek, Mechanism of high-resolution STM/AFM imaging with functionalized tips. Phys. Rev. B 90, 085421 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    Hapala, R

    P. Hapala, R. Temirov, F. S. Tautz, P. Jelínek, Origin of High-Resolution IETS-STM Images of Organic Molecules with Functionalized Tips. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 226101 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    De La Torre, M

    B. De La Torre, M. Švec, G. Foti, O. Krejčí, P. Hapala, A. Garcia-Lekue, T. Frederiksen, R. Zbořil, A. Arnau, H. Vázquez, P. Jelínek, Submolecular Resolution by Variation of the Inelastic Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy Amplitude and its Relation to the AFM/STM Signal. Phys. R...

    2017

  33. [41]

    F. E. Olsson, S. Paavilainen, M. Persson, J. Repp, G. Meyer, Multiple Charge States of Ag Atoms on Ultrathin NaCl Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 176803 (2007)

    2007

  34. [42]

    K. Yang, W. Paul, F. D. Natterer, J. L. Lado, Y. Bae, P. Willke, T. Choi, A. Ferrón, J. Fernández- Rossier, A. J. Heinrich, C. P. Lutz, Tuning the Exchange Bias on a Single Atom from 1 mT to 10 T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 227203 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    K. Yang, Y. Bae, W. Paul, F. D. Natterer, P. Willke, J. L. Lado, A. Ferrón, T. Choi, J. Fernández- Rossier, A. J. Heinrich, C. P. Lutz, Engineering the Eigenstates of Coupled Spin- 1 / 2 Atoms on a Surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 227206 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Rugar, R

    D. Rugar, R. Budakian, H. J. Mamin, B. W. Chui, Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy. Nature 430, 329–332 (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    Verlhac, N

    B. Verlhac, N. Bachellier, L. Garnier, M. Ormaza, P. Abufager, R. Robles, M.-L. Bocquet, M. Ternes, N. Lorente, L. Limot, Atomic-scale spin sensing with a single molecule at the apex of a scanning tunneling microscope. Science 366, 623–627 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    G. Czap, P. J. Wagner, F. Xue, L. Gu, J. Li, J. Yao, R. Wu, W. Ho, Probing and imaging spin interactions with a magnetic single-molecule sensor. Science 364, 670–673 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Schuler, W

    B. Schuler, W. Liu, A. Tkatchenko, N. Moll, G. Meyer, A. Mistry, D. Fox, L. Gross, Adsorption Geometry Determination of Single Molecules by Atomic Force Microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 106103 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    Ternes, Spin excitations and correlations in scanning tunneling spectroscopy

    M. Ternes, Spin excitations and correlations in scanning tunneling spectroscopy. New J. Phys. 17, 063016 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    S. Loth, C. P. Lutz, A. J. Heinrich, Spin-polarized spin excitation spectroscopy. New J. Phys. 12, 125021 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    Reina-Gálvez, C

    J. Reina-Gálvez, C. Wolf, N. Lorente, Many-body nonequilibrium effects in all-electric electron spin resonance. Phys. Rev. B 107, 235404 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    P. Kot, M. Ismail, R. Drost, J. Siebrecht, H. Huang, C. R. Ast, Electric control of spin transitions at the atomic scale. Nat Commun 14, 6612 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. Reina-Gálvez, D. Wu, J. Martinek, A. J. Heinrich, T. Choi, C. Wolf, Electric field control of the exchange field of a single spin impurity on a surface

  45. [53]

    Mikaelian, N

    G. Mikaelian, N. Ogawa, X. W. Tu, W. Ho, Atomic scale control of single molecule charging. The Journal of Chemical Physics 124, 131101 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    G. V. Nazin, S. W. Wu, W. Ho, Tunneling rates in electron transport through double-barrier molecular junctions in a scanning tunneling microscope. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 8832– 8837 (2005)

    2005

  47. [55]

    Krane, C

    N. Krane, C. Lotze, N. Bogdanoff, G. Reecht, L. Zhang, A. L. Briseno, K. J. Franke, Mapping the perturbation potential of metallic and dipolar tips in tunneling spectroscopy on MoS 2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 035410 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Ellner, N

    M. Ellner, N. Pavliček, P. Pou, B. Schuler, N. Moll, G. Meyer, L. Gross, R. Peréz, The Electric Field of CO Tips and Its Relevance for Atomic Force Microscopy. Nano Lett. 16, 1974–1980 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    S. Duan, G. Tian, X. Xu, A General Framework of Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Based on Bardeen’s Approximation for Isolated Molecules. JACS Au 3, 86–92 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    A. M. Shakirov, A. N. Rubtsov, P. Ribeiro, Spin transfer torque induced paramagnetic resonance. Phys. Rev. B 99, 054434 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    S. Loth, K. Von Bergmann, M. Ternes, A. F. Otte, C. P. Lutz, A. J. Heinrich, Controlling the state of quantum spins with electric currents. Nature Phys 6, 340–344 (2010)

    2010

  52. [60]

    W. Paul, S. Baumann, C. P. Lutz, A. J. Heinrich, Generation of constant-amplitude radio- frequency sweeps at a tunnel junction for spin resonance STM. Review of Scientific Instruments 87, 074703 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Steinbrecher, W

    M. Steinbrecher, W. M. J. Van Weerdenburg, E. F. Walraven, N. P. E. Van Mullekom, J. W. Gerritsen, F. D. Natterer, D. I. Badrtdinov, A. N. Rudenko, V. V. Mazurenko, M. I. Katsnelson, A. Van Der Avoird, G. C. Groenenboom, A. A. Khajetoorians, Quantifying the interplay between f...

    2021

  54. [62]

    M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M. S. Gordon, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K. A. Nguyen, S. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis, J. A. Montgomery, General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J Comput Chem 14, 1347–1363 (1993)

    1993

  55. [63]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. De Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Ma...

    2009

  56. [64]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. Dal Corso, S. De Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebaue...

    2017

  57. [65]

    Dal Corso, Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu

    A. Dal Corso, Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu. Computational Materials Science 95, 337–350 (2014)

    2014

  58. [66]

    Sabatini, T

    R. Sabatini, T. Gorni, S. De Gironcoli, Nonlocal van der Waals density functional made simple and efficient. Phys. Rev. B 87, 041108 (2013)

    2013

  59. [67]

    Braun, J

    M. Braun, J. König, J. Martinek, Theory of transport through quantum-dot spin valves in the weak-coupling regime. Phys. Rev. B 70, 195345 (2004)

    2004

  60. [68]

    Reina-Galvez, M

    J. Reina-Galvez, M. Nachtigall, N. Lorente, J. Martinek, C. Wolf, Contrasting exchange-field and spin-transfer torque driving mechanisms in all-electric electron spin resonance. arXiv arXiv:2503.24046 [Preprint] (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.24046. Figure 1: Orga...

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.