COCO-Inpaint: A Benchmark for Detecting and Localizing Inpainting-Based Image Manipulations
read the original abstract
Recent advances in image manipulation have enabled highly photorealistic content generation, but also lowered the barrier to arbitrary editing, raising concerns about multimedia authenticity and security. Existing Image Manipulation Detection and Localization (IMDL) methods mainly target splicing or copy-move forgeries, while benchmarks for inpainting-based manipulations remain limited. To bridge this gap, we present COCO-Inpaint, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed for inpainting detection and localization, with three key contributions: 1) High-quality inpainting samples generated by six state-of-the-art inpainting models, 2) Diverse generation scenarios enabled by four mask generation strategies with optional text guidance, and 3) Large-scale coverage of 238,302 inpainted images with rich semantic diversity. Our benchmark is constructed to highlight intrinsic inconsistencies between inpainted and authentic regions, rather than superficial semantic artifacts such as object shapes. We further establish a rigorous evaluation protocol with three standard metrics to benchmark existing IMDL methods and reveal current trends and challenges.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Multi-axis Analysis of Image Manipulation Localization
Introduces the AUDITS benchmark for multi-axis evaluation of image manipulation localization under domain shifts and other factors.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.