Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 minor 2 cited by

Classical Interfaces for Controlling Cryogenic Quantum Computing Technologies

T0 review · 0 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Future large-scale quantum computers will combine wire, light, and wireless links, according to this review.

desk verdict A well-packaged review of classical cryogenic control interfaces—no new results, but an honest comparative table and a sensible mix-technology conclusion; it deserves a serious referee with a request to fix the table's power-boundary labels and one uncited channel-capacity claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18527 v1 pith:V52RZ76Z submitted 2025-04-25 quant-ph physics.app-ph

Jack C. Brennan , Joao Barbosa , Chong Li , Meraj Ahmad , Fiheon Imroze , Calum Rose , Wridhdhisom Karar , Manoj Stanley
show 3 more authors
Hadi Heidari Nick M. Ridler Martin Weides
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.app-ph
keywords quantumcomputingclassicalinterfacequbitcontrolcryo-CMOSsinglefluxopticallinkwirelesssuperconductingqubits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review paper claims that no single classical interface technology will be able to control and read out a future large-scale cryogenic quantum computer, and that the practical route forward is a hybrid system in which different technologies are assigned to different temperature stages of the cryostat. It reaches this claim by comparing five leading approaches—conventional room-temperature microwave electronics, cryo-CMOS control chips, single-flux-quantum (SFQ) superconducting digital logic, optical/electro-optical links, and wireless links—on the metrics that actually constrain scaling: number of cables, controller-to-qubit distance, and power dissipated per qubit. The comparison matters because the quantum-classical interface is a major bottleneck on the path from hundreds to hundreds of thousands of qubits, and the choice of interface determines how much heat and wiring a dilution refrigerator must tolerate.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a comparison framework built from three scaling metrics—number of drive/readout lines, number of flux lines, controller-to-qubit distance, and power consumption per physical qubit—laid out in Table 1, together with the cryostat's cooling-power gradient (up to 1 kW at 4 K but only about 30 µW at 20 mK). The named technologies are defined in the text: cryo-CMOS (standard CMOS chips adapted to operate at cryogenic temperatures), SFQ (single-flux-quantum logic, where each digital bit is the presence or absence of a quantized 2.07 mV·ps voltage pulse), optical links (electro-optic modulators using the Pockels effect and photodiodes), and wireless links (free-space microwave or terahertz beams between room-temperature and cryogenic transceivers). The table turns a survey into an argument by making the relative scalability of the technologies explicit and yielding the hybrid conclusion.

What would settle it

Build a cryo-CMOS controller for a 100-qubit transmon chip and measure the actual readout multiplexing ratio, per-qubit power, and heat load at the 4 K stage; if the practical readout ratio stays near 8:1 instead of 100:1, then the per-qubit power for cryo-CMOS in Table 1 must be revised upward, and the claimed advantage of wireless over cryo-CMOS becomes an open question rather than a settled comparison.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, stated in its conclusion, is that future large-scale quantum devices will likely combine these interface technologies, applying each at the cryostat stage where its advantages dominate. The supporting analysis is a quantitative comparison: conventional microwave control consumes over 1 W per qubit with one or more coaxial lines per qubit; cryo-CMOS moves the control electronics to the 4 K stage and reduces power to 2–30 mW per qubit while still needing multiplexed lines; SFQ logic operates at the mK stage beside the qubits, needs no drive or readout wiring, and dissipates under 1 nW per qubit; optical links replace coax with fibres and dissipate between nanowatt and microwatt levels depending on conversion direction; wireless links remove the transmission medium entirely, keep active electronics at room temperature, and are projected at under 1 nW per qubit plus 0.5 flux lines per qubit. The paper argues that each technology's weaknesses—heat at the 4 K stage for cryo-CMOS, magnetic-field sensitivity for SFQ, conversion losses for optics, and unknown scattering and crosstalk for wireless—mean that the robust design is a stage-adapted mix rather than a single winner.

Load-bearing premise

The whole quantitative comparison depends on optimistic multiplexing ratios (100:1 readout, 25:1 control) taken from one reference, rather than the 8:1 readout ratio that near-term hardware actually achieves; if the optimistic ratios are wrong, the wiring and power advantages attributed to cryo-CMOS and wireless shrink.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cryostat design will become modular, with standardised interfaces between the room-temperature, 4 K, and mK stages, rather than a single cable bundle per qubit.
  • Engineering effort will concentrate on the parts of the chain where each chosen technology is weakest: heat extraction for cryo-CMOS, magnetic shielding for SFQ, conversion efficiency for optical links, and in-cryostat propagation for wireless.
  • Multiplexing ratio becomes a first-order design variable, since it directly sets how many wires and how much power per qubit an interface needs.
  • The 30 µW cooling budget at the mK stage effectively reserves that stage for qubits and SFQ-class devices, pushing CMOS and photonic converters to the 4 K stage or above.
  • Fault-tolerant systems built around fast feedback will favour technologies that reduce feedback latency, such as moving control logic closer to the qubits or replacing cables with wireless links.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the hybrid claim is right, the near-term race is not between technologies but between integration standards: whoever defines the inter-stage interface (electrical, optical, or wireless) may set the de facto architecture for a generation of machines.
  • The optimistic multiplexing ratios in Table 1 (100:1 readout, 25:1 control) deserve scrutiny; using the 8:1 readout ratio that near-term hardware achieves would raise cryo-CMOS's per-qubit power and line count, narrowing its apparent advantage over optical and wireless approaches.
  • A testable implication of the paper's framework is that the optimal technology mix depends on qubit count and gate speed: small NISQ machines may stay all-wired, while systems above roughly a thousand qubits force the move to SFQ, optical, or wireless.
  • The wireless approach's reliance on flux lines for tunable qubits hints that flux-tunable architectures may be less compatible with the wireless interface than fixed-frequency qubits, a consequence the review notes implicitly but does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper is a review of classical-control interface technologies for cryogenic quantum computers, focused on superconducting architectures. It sets out the scaling problem (wiring, cooling power, latency), then surveys five approaches: conventional room-temperature microwave control, cryo-CMOS controllers at the 4 K stage, single-flux-quantum logic at millikelvin temperatures, optical/electro-optical links, and free-space wireless links. The comparison is summarized in Table 1, and the authors conclude that future large-scale systems will likely use a combination of these technologies, placed at different cryostat stages according to their respective strengths.

Significance. As a review, the paper's value lies in bringing together a wide and recent literature, including 2024-2025 demonstrations of SFQ multi-qubit control, all-optical superconducting-qubit readout, and a terahertz cryogenic interconnect. It is balanced in presenting advantages and limitations, and it is transparent about the optimistic multiplexing ratios underlying the conventional and cryo-CMOS rows of Table 1. The qualitative conclusion that no single interface will dominate and that hybrid architectures are likely is defensible on the basis of the structural trade-offs described in the text, such as stage placement, wiring count, latency, and cooling load, which are discussed independently of the contested power figures. The paper does not present new derivations or data, so its evaluation rests on the accuracy and completeness of the surveyed literature; within that scope it is a useful and fair synthesis.

minor comments (8)
  1. [Power and scalability considerations, Table 1] The 'Power consumption per physical qubit' column mixes system boundaries: the >1 W value for standard microwave includes room-temperature FPGA and RF-module power [64]; the 2-30 mW for cryo-CMOS includes controller AC/DC power; the <1 nW for SFQ is junction switching energy and excludes bias/trigger lines and cryocooling; and the <1 nW for wireless is mK-side signal power only. To make the comparison usable, state these boundaries in the table itself, or split the column into wall-plug power and cryostat heat load.
  2. [Wireless control and readout, second bullet] The claim that wireless links can accommodate 'thousands or more channels' is not supported by a citation; please add a reference or soften the claim to avoid overstating the maturity of the approach.
  3. [Wireless control and readout, bullet 4 and following paragraph] The statement that mK-stage transceivers contain only passive devices is hard to reconcile with the MIT backscatter approach described immediately afterward, which places a CMOS transceiver chip in the fridge; clarify the distinction between the passive-antenna approach and the active or ultralow-power backscatter approach.
  4. [SFQ section, JDPD paragraph] The device is introduced as the Josephson digital phase detector (JDPD) but subsequently referred to as JPDP; use one acronym consistently.
  5. [Keywords] 'Wirelss' is a typo for 'Wireless'.
  6. [Cryo-CMOS Technologies section] The sentence 'A potential QC - cryo-CMOS architecture is presneted' should read 'presented'.
  7. [Table 1 caption] The table label appears as 'T able 1'; remove the unintended space.
  8. [References] Ref. [54] and Ref. [110] cite the same Fellous-Asiani et al. PRX Quantum paper; consolidate them into a single reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's qualitative conclusion is a synthesis of externally cited experimental results, not a derivation from its inputs or from self-citations.

full rationale

The paper is a review of classical interfaces for cryogenic quantum control, and its central claim is the qualitative judgment that future large-scale systems will combine multiple interfacing technologies. No equation or definition in the paper reduces a stated result to its own input: Table 1 attributes quantitative entries to external references such as [64, 110, 97, 98, 111], and the text explicitly discloses the optimistic multiplexing assumption (100:1 readout and 25:1 control from Ref. [110]) while noting that practical near-term IBM systems achieve 8:1 readout multiplexing. The conclusion does not depend on the exact multiplexing ratios or power numbers, since the structural trade-offs of each technology are described independently of the contested figures. The authors' self-citations [62, 63, 83, 103, 104] are used to illustrate their own prior characterization work on cryo-CMOS and wireless components, but none of these citations supplies a load-bearing premise, a uniqueness theorem, or an ansatz that forces the conclusion. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no self-referential derivation, and no known result repackaged under new coordinates. The disclosed limitations in Table 1 and the surrounding text are transparency about assumptions rather than circularity, and any concern about differing system boundaries in the power-per-qubit column is a correctness or consistency issue, not a circularity issue. Therefore the paper is self-contained as a review and warrants a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review's central comparison rests on two domain assumptions about cryogenic operation and cooling power limits. No free parameters are fitted, and no new entities are introduced. All quantitative claims are attributed to cited literature.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Superconducting qubits must be operated at temperatures around tens of millikelvin, below the superconducting energy gap.
    The entire review is premised on the cryogenic environment; the paper cites Refs. [20,21,26,28] for this requirement.
  • domain assumption Cooling power at cryogenic stages is strictly limited, with roughly 1 kW at 4 K but only tens of microwatts at 20 mK.
    From the IRDS roadmap (Ref. [41]); this limit motivates comparing interfaces by heat load and power per qubit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classical Interfaces for Controlling Cryogenic Quantum Computing Technologies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V52RZ76Z

@misc{pith2026250418527,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classical Interfaces for Controlling Cryogenic Quantum Computing Technologies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V52RZ76Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18527}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum processors have the potential to revolutionise computing on a scale unseen since the development of semiconductor technology in the middle of the 20th century. However, while there is now huge activity and investment in the field, there are a number of challenges that must be overcome before the technology can be fully realised. Of primary concern is the development of the classical technology required to interface with quantum systems, as we push towards a new era of high-performance, large-scale quantum computing. In this review, we briefly discuss some of the main challenges facing the development of universally useful quantum computers and the different architectures being investigated. We are primarily concerned with cryogenic quantum systems. These systems are among the most mature quantum computing architectures to date, and are garnering a lot of both industrial and academic attention. We present and analyse the leading methods of interfacing with quantum processors, both now and for the next generation of larger, multi-qubit systems. Recent advancements in control cryoelectronics, both semiconducting and superconducting, are covered, while a view towards newer methods such as optical and wireless qubit interfaces are also presented.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Cryogenic Dielectric Antenna for Wireless Sensing and Interfacing Outside the 10 K Environment

    physics.optics 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ZST dielectric resonator antennas show stable, high-Q behavior from 296 K to 10 K and can form a 1 mW through-window wireless sensing link, while MCT resonators drift, lose Q, and exhibit hysteresis.

  2. Circuit simulation of readout process toward large-scale superconducting quantum circuits

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The authors show that a SPICE simulator using classical LCR models can handle 10,000-qubit superconducting readout circuits on a laptop and estimate relative readout fidelity under parameter variations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Reports on Progress in Physics 61, 117 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/61/2/002

    Steane, A.: Quantum computing. Reports on Progress in Physics 61, 117 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/61/2/002

    doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/2/002 1998

  2. [2]

    Springer (2020)

    Spentzouris, P.: Quantum Computing: Advancing Fundamental Physics. Springer (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41781-020-00043-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s41781-020-00043-x 2020

  3. [3]

    (ed.) The Future of Drug Development with Quantum Computing, pp

    Bonde, B., Patil, P., Choubey, B.: In: Heifetz, A. (ed.) The Future of Drug Development with Quantum Computing, pp. 153–179. Springer, ??? (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3449-3 7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3449-3 2024

  4. [4]

    Nature Reviews Physics 2, 596–598 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00247-5

    MacQuarrie, E.R., Simon, C., Simmons, S., Maine, E.: The emerging commercial landscape of quantum computing. Nature Reviews Physics 2, 596–598 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00247-5

    doi:10.1038/s42254-020-00247-5 2020

  5. [5]

    Fedorov, A.K., Gisin, N., Beloussov, S.M., Lvovsky, A.I.: Quantum computing at the quantum advantage threshold: a down-to-business review (2022) https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.17181

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.17181 2022

  6. [6]

    836–845 (2017)

    Almudever, C.G., Lao, L., Fu, X., Khammassi, N., Ashraf, I., Iorga, D., Varsamopoulos, S., Eichler, C., Wallraff, A., Geck, L., Kruth, A., Knoch, J., Bluhm, H., Bertels, K.: The engineering challenges in quantum computing, pp. 836–845 (2017). https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE.2017.7927104

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Quantum 2, 79 (2018) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

    Preskill, J.: Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

    doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 2018

  8. [8]

    https://research .ibm.com/ blog/100k-qubit-supercomputer (2023)

    IBM: IBM: Charting the course to 100,000 qubits. https://research .ibm.com/ blog/100k-qubit-supercomputer (2023)

    2023

Show all 113 references
  1. [9]

    https://www .gov.uk/government/publications/ national-quantum-strategy (2023)

    UK Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology: UK Government: National Quantum Strategy. https://www .gov.uk/government/publications/ national-quantum-strategy (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    https://digital- strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/quantum-technologies-flagship (2022) 22

    European Commission: EU: Quantum Technologies Flagship. https://digital- strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/quantum-technologies-flagship (2022) 22

    2022

  3. [11]

    Software: Practice and Experience 52, 66–114 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1002/ spe.3039

    Gill, S.S., Kumar, A., Singh, H., Singh, M., Kaur, K., Usman, M., Buyya, R.: Quantum computing: A taxonomy, systematic review and future directions. Software: Practice and Experience 52, 66–114 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1002/ spe.3039

    2022

  4. [12]

    The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2019)

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Quantum Comput- ing: Progress and Prospects. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2019). https://doi .org/10.17226/25196 . https://nap .nationalacademies.org/ catalog/25196/quantum-computing-progress-and-prospects

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    Nature Reviews Materials 6, 875–891 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00370-4

    Siddiqi, I.: Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits. Nature Reviews Materials 6, 875–891 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00370-4

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Science 372(6539), 2823 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2823 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abb2823

    Leon, N.P., Itoh, K.M., Kim, D., Mehta, K.K., Northup, T.E., Paik, H., Palmer, B.S., Samarth, N., Sangtawesin, S., Steuerman, D.W.: Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hard- ware. Science 372(6539), 2823 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2823 h...

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    Nature Reviews Physics 6, 160–161 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024- 00706-3

    Campbell, E.: A series of fast-paced advances in quantum error correction. Nature Reviews Physics 6, 160–161 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024- 00706-3

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 94, 15004 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.94.015004

    Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T.H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J.S., Menke, T., Mok, W.-K., Sim, S., Kwek, L.-C., Aspuru-Guzik, A.: Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algo- rithms. Reviews of Modern Physics 94, 15004 (2022...

    2022

  9. [17]

    APL Quantum 1(1), 011501 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0180987 https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apq/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0180987/19841793/011501 1 5.0180987.pdf

    Shammah, N., Saha Roy, A., Almudever, C.G., Bourdeauducq, S., Butko, A., Cancelo, G., Clark, S.M., Heinsoo, J., Henriet, L., Huang, G., Jur- czak, C., Kotilahti, J., Landra, A., LaRose, R., Mari, A., Nowrouzi, K., Ockeloen-Korppi, C., Prawiroatmodjo, G., Siddiqi, I., Zeng, W.J...

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Nature Reviews Physics 3, 625–644 (2021) https://doi .org/ 10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9

    Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S.C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J.R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., Coles, P.J.: Variational quan- tum algorithms. Nature Reviews Physics 3, 625–644 (2021) https://doi .org/ 10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9

    2021 doi

  11. [19]

    The European Physical Journal A 59, 94 (2023) https://doi .org/10.1140/epja/ s10050-023-01006-7

    Ezratty, O.: Perspective on superconducting qubit quantum computing. The European Physical Journal A 59, 94 (2023) https://doi .org/10.1140/epja/ s10050-023-01006-7

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Serniak, K., Hays, M., Lange, G., Diamond, S., Shankar, S., Burkhart, L.D., 23 Frunzio, L., Houzet, M., Devoret, M.H.: Hot nonequilibrium quasiparticles in transmon qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 157701 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.157701

    2018

  13. [21]

    EPJ Quantum Technology6(1), 2 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-019-0072-0

    Krinner, S., Storz, S., Kurpiers, P., Magnard, P., Heinsoo, J., Keller, R., L¨ utolf, J., Eichler, C., Wallraff, A.: Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems. EPJ Quantum Technology6(1), 2 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-019-0072-0

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    Nature 453(7198), 1031–1042 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07128

    Clarke, J., Wilhelm, F.K.: Superconducting quantum bits. Nature 453(7198), 1031–1042 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07128

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 106001 (2017) https://doi .org/ 10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1a

    Wendin, G.: Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 106001 (2017) https://doi .org/ 10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1a

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    npj Quantum Information 8, 93 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-022-00600-9

    Verjauw, J., Acharya, R., Damme, J.V., Ivanov, T., Lozano, D.P., Mohiyaddin, F.A., Wan, D., Jussot, J., Vadiraj, A.M., Mongillo, M., Heyns, M., Radu, I., Gov- oreanu, B., Potoˇ cnik, A.: Path toward manufacturable superconducting qubits with relaxation times exceeding 0.1 ms. ...

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    Nature 634(8032), 74–79 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07941-9

    Van Damme, J., Massar, S., Acharya, R., Ivanov, T., Perez Lozano, D., Canvel, Y., Demarets, M., Vangoidsenhoven, D., Hermans, Y., Lai, J.G., Vadiraj, A.M., Mongillo, M., Wan, D., De Boeck, J., Potoˇ cnik, A., De Greve, K.: Advanced cmos manufacturing of superconducting qubits ...

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Kjaergaard, M., Schwartz, M.E., Braum¨ uller, J., Krantz, P., I-J Wang, J., Gus- tavsson, S., Oliver, W.D.: Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play (2020) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    MRS Bulletin 38, 816–825 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2013.229

    Oliver, W.D., Welander, P.B.: Materials in superconducting quantum bits. MRS Bulletin 38, 816–825 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2013.229

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    Applied Physics Reviews 6(2) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550

    Krantz, P., Kjaergaard, M., Yan, F., Orlando, T.P., Gustavsson, S., Oliver, W.D.: A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits. Applied Physics Reviews 6(2) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Nature 609(7929), 919–924 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05117-x

    Philips, S.G.J., M¸ adzik, M.T., Amitonov, S.V., Snoo, S.L., Russ, M., Kalhor, N., Volk, C., Lawrie, W.I.L., Brousse, D., Tryputen, L., Wuetz, B.P., Sammak, A., Veldhorst, M., Scappucci, G., Vandersypen, L.M.K.: Universal control of a six-qubit quantum processor in silicon. Na...

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 95(2) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/ 24 RevModPhys.95.025003

    Burkard, G., Ladd, T.D., Pan, A., Nichol, J.M., Petta, J.R.: Semiconductor spin qubits. Reviews of Modern Physics 95(2) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/ 24 RevModPhys.95.025003

    2023

  23. [31]

    Applied Physics Reviews 6(2) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088164

    Bruzewicz, C.D., Chiaverini, J., McConnell, R., Sage, J.M.: Trapped-ion quan- tum computing: Progress and challenges. Applied Physics Reviews 6(2) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088164

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    American Institute of Physics Inc

    Slussarenko, S., Pryde, G.J.: Photonic quantum information processing: A con- cise review. American Institute of Physics Inc. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.5115814

    2019

  25. [33]

    ISSS Journal of Micro and Smart Systems 12(2), 83–104 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41683-023-00115-1

    Ramakrishnan, R.K., Ravichandran, A.B., Mishra, A., Kaushalram, A., Hegde, G., Talabattula, S., Rohde, P.P.: Integrated photonic platforms for quantum technology: a review. ISSS Journal of Micro and Smart Systems 12(2), 83–104 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41683-023-00115-1

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    Review of Scientific Instruments 87, 113103 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4966970

    Brandl, M.F., Mourik, M.W., Postler, L., Nolf, A., Lakhmanskiy, K., Paiva, R.R., M¨ oller, S., Daniilidis, N., H¨ affner, H., Kaushal, V., Ruster, T., Warschburger, C., Kaufmann, H., Poschinger, U.G., Schmidt-Kaler, F., Schindler, P., Monz, T., Blatt, R.: Cryogenic setup for t...

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    Quantum Science and Technology 4, 014004 (2019) https://doi .org/10.1088/2058-9565/ aae0fe

    Pagano, G., Hess, P.W., Kaplan, H.B., Tan, W.L., Richerme, P., Becker, P., Kyprianidis, A., Zhang, J., Birckelbaw, E., Hernandez, M.R., Wu, Y., Monroe, C.: Cryogenic trapped-ion system for large scale quantum simulation. Quantum Science and Technology 4, 014004 (2019) https://...

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    Nature Reviews Materials 6, 892–905 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00292-1

    Brown, K.R., Chiaverini, J., Sage, J.M., H¨ affner, H.: Materials challenges for trapped-ion quantum computers. Nature Reviews Materials 6, 892–905 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00292-1

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Todaro, S.L., Verma, V.B., McCormick, K.C., Allcock, D.T.C., Mirin, R.P., Wineland, D.J., Nam, S.W., Wilson, A.C., Leibfried, D., Slichter, D.H.: State readout of a trapped ion qubit using a trap-integrated superconducting pho- ton detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 010501 (2021)...

    2021

  30. [38]

    Nature Communications 12, 1408 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21624-3

    Gyger, S., Zichi, J., Schweickert, L., Elshaari, A.W., Steinhauer, S., Silva, S.F.C., Rastelli, A., Zwiller, V., J¨ ons, K.D., Errando-Herranz, C.: Reconfigurable pho- tonics with on-chip single-photon detectors. Nature Communications 12, 1408 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s4...

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    Applied Physics Letters 118(19), 190502 25 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0045990 https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0045990/14547612/190502 1 online.pdf

    Esmaeil Zadeh, I., Chang, J., Los, J.W.N., Gyger, S., Elshaari, A.W., Steinhauer, S., Dorenbos, S.N., Zwiller, V.: Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state-of-the-art, future developments, and applications. Applied Physics Letters 118...

    2021 doi

  32. [40]

    IEEE Micro 41(3), 80–86 (2021) https://doi .org/10.1109/ MM.2021.3070133

    Byun, I., Min, D., Lee, G., Na, S., Kim, J.: A next-generation cryogenic pro- cessor architecture. IEEE Micro 41(3), 80–86 (2021) https://doi .org/10.1109/ MM.2021.3070133

    2021

  33. [41]

    In: 2021 IEEE International Roadmap for Devices and Systems Outbriefs, pp

    Holmes, D.: Cryogenic electronics and quantum information processing. In: 2021 IEEE International Roadmap for Devices and Systems Outbriefs, pp. 1–

    2021

  34. [42]

    Motzoi, F., Gambetta, J.M., Rebentrost, P., Wilhelm, F.K.: Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 110501 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.110501

    2009 doi

  35. [43]

    Ezzell, N., Pokharel, B., Tewala, L., Quiroz, G., Lidar, D.A.: Dynamical decou- pling for superconducting qubits: A performance survey. Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 064027 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.064027

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken (2011)

    Pozar, D.M.: Microwave Engineering, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken (2011)

    2011

  37. [45]

    Physical Review D 26(8), 1817–1839 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1817

    Caves, C.M.: Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers. Physical Review D 26(8), 1817–1839 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1817

    1982 doi

  38. [46]

    Physical Review A 48(6) (1993)

    Leonhardt, U., Paul, H.: Realistic optical homodyne measurements and quasiprobability distributions. Physical Review A 48(6) (1993)

    1993

  39. [47]

    Cambridge University Press, ??? (2009)

    Wiseman, H.M., Milburn, G.J.: Quantum Measurement and Control. Cambridge University Press, ??? (2009). https://doi .org/10.1017/CBO9780511813948 . https://www .cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9780511813948/type/ book

    2009

  40. [48]

    https: //www.entegra.co.uk/ii-products/rfsoc-rfx-8440-data-acquisition-fpga-card/

    Entegra: Entegra RFX-8440 - FPGA Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC (2024). https: //www.entegra.co.uk/ii-products/rfsoc-rfx-8440-data-acquisition-fpga-card/

    2024

  41. [49]

    Physical Review Applied 9(3) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.034011

    Salath´ e, Y., Kurpiers, P., Karg, T., Lang, C., Andersen, C.K., Akin, A., Krinner, S., Eichler, C., Wallraff, A.: Low-Latency Digital Signal Processing for Feedback and Feedforward in Quantum Computing and Communication. Physical Review Applied 9(3) (2018) https://doi.org/10....

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    Review of Scientific Instruments 93(4) (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1063/5.0076249

    Stefanazzi, L., Treptow, K., Wilcer, N., Stoughton, C., Bradford, C., Uemura, S., Zorzetti, S., Montella, S., Cancelo, G., Sussman, S., Houck, A., Sax- ena, S., Arnaldi, H., Agrawal, A., Zhang, H., Ding, C., Schuster, D.I.: The QICK (Quantum Instrumentation Control Kit): Reado...

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    https://www.quantum-machines.co/products/opx/

    Quantum Machines: OPX+: Ultra-Fast Quantum Control Hardware (2023). https://www.quantum-machines.co/products/opx/

    2023

  44. [52]

    https://research .ibm.com/ blog/goldeneye-cryogenic-concept-system

    IBM: Goldeneye cryogenic concept system (2022). https://research .ibm.com/ blog/goldeneye-cryogenic-concept-system

    2022

  45. [53]

    Chen, S.: Are quantum computers really energy efficient? Nature Computational Science 3(6), 457–460 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00459-6

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    PRX Quantum 4(4), 40319 (2023) https://doi .org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.4.040319

    Fellous-Asiani, M., Chai, J.H., Thonnart, Y., Ng, H.K., Whitney, R.S., Auff` eves, A.: Optimizing Resource Efficiencies for Scalable Full-Stack Quan- tum Computers. PRX Quantum 4(4), 40319 (2023) https://doi .org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.4.040319

    2023

  47. [55]

    Physical Review Applied 7(5) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.054020

    Walter, T., Kurpiers, P., Gasparinetti, S., Magnard, P., Potoˇ cnik, A., Salath´ e, Y., Pechal, M., Mondal, M., Oppliger, M., Eichler, C., Wallraff, A.: Rapid High- Fidelity Single-Shot Dispersive Readout of Superconducting Qubits. Physical Review Applied 7(5) (2017) https://d...

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    In: Physica Scripta T, vol

    DiVincenzo, D.P.: Fault-tolerant architectures for superconducting qubits. In: Physica Scripta T, vol. T137 (2009). https://doi .org/10.1088/0031-8949/2009/ T137/014020

    2009 doi

  49. [57]

    Nature 508(7497), 500–503 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13171

    Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Veitia, A., Sank, D., Jeffrey, E., White, T.C., Mutus, J., Fowler, A.G., Campbell, B., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Dunsworth, A., Neill, C., O’Malley, P., Roushan, P., Vainsencher, A., Wenner, J., Korotkov, A.N., Cleland, A.N., Martinis...

    2014 doi

  50. [58]

    In: 2016 IEEE Interna- tional Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), pp

    Charbon, E., Sebastiano, F., Vladimirescu, A., Homulle, H., Visser, S., Song, L., Incandela, R.M.: Cryo-cmos for quantum computing. In: 2016 IEEE Interna- tional Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), pp. 13–511354 (2016). https://doi.org/ 10.1109/IEDM.2016.7838410

    2016

  51. [59]

    In: Technical Digest - International Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM, vol

    Sebastiano, F., Van Dijk, J.P.G., Thart, P.A., Patra, B., Van Staveren, J., Xue, X., Almudever, C.G., Scappucci, G., Veldhorst, M., Vandersypen, L.M.K., Vladimirescu, A., Pellerano, S., Babaie, M., Charbon, E.: Cryo-CMOS inter- faces for large-scale quantum computers. In: Tech...

    2020

  52. [60]

    In: Proceedings - Design Automation Conference, vol

    Sebastiano, F., Homulle, H., Patra, B., Incandela, R., Van Dijk, J., Song, L., 27 Babaie, M., Vladimirescu, A., Charbon, E.: Cryo-CMOS Electronic Control for Scalable Quantum Computing: Invited. In: Proceedings - Design Automation Conference, vol. Part 128280. Institute of Ele...

    2017

  53. [61]

    IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 53(1), 309–321 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2017.2737549

    Patra, B., Incandela, R.M., Van Dijk, J.P.G., Homulle, H.A.R., Song, L., Shah- mohammadi, M., Staszewski, R.B., Vladimirescu, A., Babaie, M., Sebastiano, F., Charbon, E.: Cryo-CMOS Circuits and Systems for Quantum Comput- ing Applications. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits ...

    2018

  54. [63]

    In: ICECS 2022 - 29th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, Proceedings

    Giagkoulovits, C., Ahmad, M., Nikbakhtnasrabadi, F., Imroze, F., Weides, M., Heidari, H.: CryoCMOS Characterization Strategies and Challenges. In: ICECS 2022 - 29th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Ele...

    2022

  55. [64]

    IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 54(11), 3043–3060 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2019.2937234

    Bardin, J.C., Jeffrey, E., Lucero, E., Huang, T., Das, S., Sank, D.T., Naaman, O., Megrant, A.E., Barends, R., White, T., Giustina, M., Satzinger, K.J., Arya, K., Roushan, P., Chiaro, B., Kelly, J., Chen, Z., Burkett, B., Chen, Y., Dunsworth, A., Fowler, A., Foxen, B., Gidney,...

    2019

  56. [65]

    In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pp

    Mehrpoo, M., Patra, B., Gong, J., Dijk, J.P.G.v., Homulle, H., Kiene, G., Vladimirescu, A., Sebastiano, F., Charbon, E., Babaie, M.: Benefits and Chal- lenges of Designing Cryogenic CMOS RF Circuits for Quantum Computers. In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and S...

    2019

  57. [66]

    IEEE Microwave Magazine 22(1), 60–78 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2020.3023271

    Charbon, E., Babaie, M., Vladimirescu, A., Sebastiano, F.: Cryogenic CMOS Circuits and Systems: Challenges and Opportunities in Designing the Electronic Interface for Quantum Processors. IEEE Microwave Magazine 22(1), 60–78 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2020.3023271

    2021

  58. [67]

    Nature Electronics 28 4(1), 64–70 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00528-y

    Pauka, S.J., Das, K., Kalra, R., Moini, A., Yang, Y., Trainer, M., Bousquet, A., Cantaloube, C., Dick, N., Gardner, G.C., Manfra, M.J., Reilly, D.J.: A cryogenic cmos chip for generating control signals for multiple qubits. Nature Electronics 28 4(1), 64–70 (2021) https://doi....

    2021 doi

  59. [68]

    IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability 21(4), 620–626 (2021) https://doi .org/ 10.1109/TDMR.2021.3124417

    Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Lu, T.T., Zhang, Y., Luo, C., Guo, G.: Hot Carrier Degrada- tion in MOSFETs at Cryogenic Temperatures down to 4.2 K. IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability 21(4), 620–626 (2021) https://doi .org/ 10.1109/TDMR.2021.3124417

    2021

  60. [69]

    IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 6, 1007–1018 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/JEDS.2018.2817458

    Beckers, A., Jazaeri, F., Enz, C.: Characterization and Modeling of 28-nm Bulk CMOS Technology Down to 4.2 K. IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 6, 1007–1018 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/JEDS.2018.2817458

    2018

  61. [70]

    IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 8, 897–904 (2020) https://doi .org/ 10.1109/JEDS.2020.3015265

    Lu, T.T., Li, Z., Luo, C., Xu, J., Kong, W., Guo, G.: Characterization and Modeling of 0.18µm Bulk CMOS Technology at Sub-Kelvin Temperature. IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 8, 897–904 (2020) https://doi .org/ 10.1109/JEDS.2020.3015265

    2020

  62. [71]

    Applied Physics Reviews 7(4) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0007119

    Le Guevel, L., Billiot, G., Cardoso Paz, B., Tagliaferri, M.L.V., De Franceschi, S., Maurand, R., Cass´ e, M., Zurita, M., Sanquer, M., Vinet, M., Jehl, X., Jansen, A.G.M., Pillonnet, G.: Low-power transimpedance amplifier for cryo- genic integration with quantum devices. Appl...

    2020 doi

  63. [72]

    IEEE Solid-State Circuits Letters (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/ LSSC.2020.3010234

    Yang, Y., Das, K., Moini, A., Reilly, D.J.: A Cryo-CMOS Voltage Reference in 28nm FDSOI. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Letters (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/ LSSC.2020.3010234

    2020

  64. [73]

    In: 2020 IEEE Custom Inte- grated Circuits Conference (CICC), pp

    Dijk, J., Hart, P., Kiene, G., Overwater, R., Padalia, P., Staveren, J., Babaie, M., Vladimirescu, A., Charbon, E., Sebastiano, F.: Cryo-cmos for analog/mixed-signal circuits and systems. In: 2020 IEEE Custom Inte- grated Circuits Conference (CICC), pp. 1–8 (2020). https://doi...

    2020

  65. [75]

    IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 56(11), 3289–3306 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2021.3115988 29

    Park, J., Subramanian, S., Lampert, L., Mladenov, T., Klotchkov, I., Kurian, D.J., Juarez-Hernandez, E., Esparza, B.P., Kale, S.R., Asma Beevi, K.T., Pre- maratne, S.P., Watson, T.F., Suzuki, S., Rahman, M., Timbadiya, J.B., Soni, S., Pellerano, S.: A Fully Integrated Cryo-CMO...

    2021

  66. [76]

    IEEE Jour- nal of Solid-State Circuits 57(11), 3258–3273 (2022) https://doi .org/10.1109/ JSSC.2022.3201775

    Chakraborty, S., Frank, D.J., Tien, K., Rosno, P., Yeck, M., Glick, J.A., Rober- tazzi, R., Richetta, R., Bulzacchelli, J.F., Underwood, D., Ramirez, D., Yilma, D., Davies, A., Joshi, R.V., Chambers, S.D., Lekuch, S., Inoue, K., Wisnieff, D., Baks, C.W., Bethune, D.S., Timmerw...

    2022

  67. [77]

    https://arctic- kdt.eu/ (2024)

    European Union: European Chips Joint Undertaking: ARCTIC. https://arctic- kdt.eu/ (2024)

    2024

  68. [78]

    Physical Review Applied 11(1) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.11.014009

    Leonard, E., Beck, M.A., Nelson, J., Christensen, B.G., Thorbeck, T., Howing- ton, C., Opremcak, A., Pechenezhskiy, I.V., Dodge, K., Dupuis, N.P., Hutchings, M.D., Ku, J., Schlenker, F., Suttle, J., Wilen, C., Zhu, S., Vavilov, M.G., Plourde, B.L.T., McDermott, R.: Digital Coh...

    2019

  69. [79]

    PRX Quantum 4(3) (2023) https://doi .org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.4.030310

    Liu, C.H., Ballard, A., Olaya, D., Schmidt, D.R., Biesecker, J., Lucas, T., Ullom, J., Patel, S., Rafferty, O., Opremcak, A., Dodge, K., Iaia, V., McB- room, T., Dubois, J.L., Hopkins, P.F., Benz, S.P., Plourde, B.L.T., McDermott, R.: Single Flux Quantum-Based Digital Control ...

    2023

  70. [80]

    IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 1(1) (1991)

    Likharev, K., Semenov, V.: RSFQ Logic/ Memory Family: A New Josephson- Junction Technology for Sub-Terahertz-Clock-Frequency Digital Systems. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 1(1) (1991)

    1991

  71. [81]

    International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems 11(01), 257–305 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1142/s012915640100085x

    Bunyk, P., Likharev, K., Zinoviev, D.: RSFQ Technology: Physics and Devices. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems 11(01), 257–305 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1142/s012915640100085x

    2001 doi

  72. [82]

    Technical Report 2 (1999)

    Chen, W., Rylyakov, A.V., Patel, V., Lukens, J.E., Likharev, K.K.: Rapid Single Flux Quantum T-Flip Flop Operating up to 770 GHz. Technical Report 2 (1999)

    1999

  73. [83]

    IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 1–12 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/TQE.2024.3520805

    Barbosa, J., Brennan, J.C., Casaburi, A., Hutchings, M.D., Kirichenko, A., Mukhanov, O., Weides, M.: RSFQ All-Digital Programmable Multi-Tone Gen- erator For Quantum Applications. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 1–12 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/TQE.2024.3520805

    2024

  74. [84]

    Physical Review Applied 2(1) (2014) https://doi .org/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.2.014007

    McDermott, R., Vavilov, M.G.: Accurate Qubit Control with Single Flux Quan- tum Pulses. Physical Review Applied 2(1) (2014) https://doi .org/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.2.014007

    2014

  75. [85]

    Geng, X., Huang, R., He, Y., He, K., Dai, G., Yang, L., Wu, X., Yu, Q., Cheng, 30 M., Chen, G., Liu, J., Chen, W.: Qubit Energy Tuner Based on Single Flux Quantum Circuits (2023) https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1215468

    2023

  76. [86]

    Physical Review Applied 12(1) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.014044

    Li, K., McDermott, R., Vavilov, M.G.: Hardware-Efficient Qubit Control with Single-Flux-Quantum Pulse Sequences. Physical Review Applied 12(1) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.014044

    2019 doi

  77. [87]

    In: Proceedings - 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, QCE 2021, pp

    Jokar, M.R., Rines, R., Chong, F.T.: Practical implications of SFQ-based two-qubit gates. In: Proceedings - 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, QCE 2021, pp. 402–412. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., ??? (2021). https...

    2021

  78. [88]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09879

    Bernhardt, J., Jordan, C., Rahamim, J., Kirchenko, A., Bharadwaj, K., Fry- Bouriaux, L., Porsch, K., Somoroff, A., Tsai, K.-T., Walter, J., Weis, A., Yu, M.-J., Renzullo, M., Yohannes, D., Vernik, I., Mukhanov, O., Han, S.J.: Quan- tum Computer Controlled by Superconducting Di...

    2025

  79. [89]

    Science361(6408), 1239–1242 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat4625

    Opremcak, A., Pechenezhskiy, I.V., Howington, C., Christensen, B.G., Beck, M.A., Leonard, E., Suttle, J., Wilen, C., Nesterov, K.N., Ribeill, G.J., Thorbeck, T., Schlenker, F., Vavilov, M.G., Plourde, B.L.T., McDermott, R.: Measurement of a superconducting qubit with a microwa...

    2018 doi

  80. [90]

    IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 29(5) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2019.2908884

    Howington, C., Opremcak, A., McDermott, R., Kirichenko, A., Mukhanov, O.A., Plourde, B.L.T.: Interfacing Superconducting Qubits with Cryogenic Logic: Readout. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 29(5) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2019.2908884

    2019

  81. [91]

    Physical Review Applied 19(6) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.064025

    Di Palma, L., Miano, A., Mastrovito, P., Massarotti, D., Arzeo, M., Pepe, G.P., Tafuri, F., Mukhanov, O.: Discriminating the Phase of a Coherent Tone with a Flux-Switchable Superconducting Circuit. Physical Review Applied 19(6) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.064025

    2023 doi

  82. [92]

    PRX Quantum 3(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.010350

    Howe, L., Castellanos-Beltran, M., Sirois, A.J., Olaya, D., Biesecker, J., Dres- selhaus, P.D., Benz, S.P., Hopkins, P.F.: Digital Control of a Superconducting Qubit Using a Josephson Pulse Generator at 3 K. PRX Quantum 3(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.010350

    2022 doi

  83. [93]

    https://doi .org/ 10.1109/IRDS54852.2021.00012

    IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (2021). https://doi .org/ 10.1109/IRDS54852.2021.00012 . https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ IRDS54852.2021.00012

    2021

  84. [94]

    Quantum Science and Technology 3(2) (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aaa3a0

    McDermott, R., Vavilov, M.G., Plourde, B.L.T., Wilhelm, F.K., Liebermann, P.J., Mukhanov, O.A., Ohki, T.A.: Quantum-classical interface based on single flux quantum digital logic. Quantum Science and Technology 3(2) (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aaa3a0

    2018 doi

  85. [95]

    31 npj Quantum Information 10(1), 53 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024- 00849-2

    Takeuchi, N., Yamae, T., Yamashita, T., Yamamoto, T., Yoshikawa, N.: Microwave-multiplexed qubit controller using adiabatic superconductor logic. 31 npj Quantum Information 10(1), 53 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024- 00849-2

    2024 doi

  86. [96]

    American Institute of Physics Inc

    Sinatkas, G., Christopoulos, T., Tsilipakos, O., Kriezis, E.E.: Electro-optic mod- ulation in integrated photonics. American Institute of Physics Inc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048712

    2021 doi

  87. [97]

    Optics Express 26(18), 23728 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/ oe.26.023728

    Weigel, P.O., Zhao, J., Fang, K., Al-Rubaye, H., Trotter, D., Hood, D., Mudrick, J., Dallo, C., Pomerene, A.T., Starbuck, A.L., DeRose, C.T., Lentine, A.L., Rebeiz, G., Mookherjea, S.: Bonded thin film lithium niobate modulator on a silicon photonics platform exceeding 100 GHz...

    2018

  88. [98]

    Nature Electronics 4(5), 326–332 (2021) https://doi .org/ 10.1038/s41928-021-00570-4

    Youssefi, A., Shomroni, I., Joshi, Y.J., Bernier, N.R., Lukashchuk, A., Uhrich, P., Qiu, L., Kippenberg, T.J.: A cryogenic electro-optic interconnect for super- conducting devices. Nature Electronics 4(5), 326–332 (2021) https://doi .org/ 10.1038/s41928-021-00570-4

    2021 doi

  89. [99]

    Nature 591(7851), 575–579 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03268-x

    Lecocq, F., Quinlan, F., Cicak, K., Aumentado, J., Diddams, S.A., Teufel, J.D.: Control and readout of a superconducting qubit using a photonic link. Nature 591(7851), 575–579 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03268-x

    2021 doi

  90. [100]

    Technical Report 7 (1999)

    Yoshida, K., Kanda, Y., Kohjiro, S.: A Traveling-Wave-Type LiNbO Optical Modulator with Superconducting Electrodes. Technical Report 7 (1999)

    1999

  91. [101]

    Scientific Reports 10(1) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65971-5

    Cea, M., Wollman, E.E., Atabaki, A.H., Gray, D.J., Shaw, M.D., Ram, R.J.: Pho- tonic Readout of Superconducting Nanowire Single Photon Counting Detectors. Scientific Reports 10(1) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65971-5

    2020 doi

  92. [102]

    Thiele, F., Hummel, T., McCaughan, A.N., Brockmeier, J., Protte, M., Quiring, V., Lengeling, S., Eigner, C., Silberhorn, C., Bartley, T.J.: All optical operation of a superconducting photonic interface (2023)

    2023

  93. [103]

    Nature Physics 21, 393–400 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02741-4

    Arnold, G., Werner, T., Sahu, R., Kapoor, L.N., Qiu, L., Fink, J.M.: All- optical superconducting qubit readout. Nature Physics 21, 393–400 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02741-4

    2025 doi

  94. [104]

    In: 2023 101st ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference, pp

    Al-Moathin, A., Zhong, M., Raghib Ali Al-Taai, Q., Jiang, Y., Farage, M., Kazim, J.U.R., Ali, M., Nikbakhtnasrabadi, F., Powell, M., Khatri, P., Stanley, M., Rossi, A., Heidari, H., Imran, M., Abbasi, Q., Ridler, N., Weides, M., Li, C.: Characterization of a Compact Wideband M...

    2023

  95. [105]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, pp

    Kazim, J.U.R., Ali, M., Al-Moathin, A., Nikbakhtnasrabadi, F., Khatri, P., Powell, M., Stanley, M., Ridler, N., Rossi, A., Weides, M., Heidari, H., Imran, 32 M., Abbasi, Q., Li, C.: Wireless Microwave Signal Transmission for Cryo- genic Applications. In: 2023 IEEE Internationa...

    2023

  96. [106]

    In: Digest of Technical Papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, vol

    Wang, J., Ibrahim, M.I., Harris, I.B., Monroe, N.M., Wasiq Khan, M.I., Yi, X., Englund, D.R., Han, R.: 34.1 THz Cryo-CMOS Backscatter Transceiver: A Contactless 4 Kelvin-300 Kelvin Data Interface. In: Digest of Technical Papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Confere...

    2023

  97. [107]

    IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering PP, 1–30 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/TQE.2023.3290593

    Anders, J., Babaie, M., Bardin, J., Bashir, I., Billiot, G., Blokhina, E., Bonen, S., Charbon, E., Chiaverini, J., Chuang, I., Degenhardt, C., Englund, D., Geck, L., Le Guevel, L., Ham, D., Han, R., Ibrahim, I., Kr¨ uger, D., Lei, K.M., Voinigescu, S.: CMOS Integrated Circuits...

    2023

  98. [108]

    In: Proceedings - IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol

    Alarcon, E., Abadal, S., Sebastiano, F., Babaie, M., Charbon, E., Bolivar, P.H., Palesi, M., Blokhina, E., Leipold, D., Staszewski, B., Garcia-Saez, A., Almudever, C.G.: Scalable multi-chip quantum architectures enabled by cryo- genic hybrid wireless/quantum-coherent network-i...

    2023

  99. [109]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11170

    Anferov, A., Wan, F., Harvey, S.P., Simon, J., Schuster, D.I.: A Millimeter-Wave Superconducting Qubit (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11170

    2024 arXiv

  100. [110]

    Nature Electronics (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-025-01355-9

    Wang, J., Harris, I., Ibrahim, M., Englund, D., Han, R.: A wireless tera- hertz cryogenic interconnect that minimizes heat-to-information transfer. Nature Electronics (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-025-01355-9

    2025 doi

  101. [111]

    PRX Quantum 4, 040319 (2023) https://doi .org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.4.040319

    Fellous-Asiani, M., Chai, J.H., Thonnart, Y., Ng, H.K., Whitney, R.S., Auff` eves, A.: Optimizing Resource Efficiencies for Scalable Full-Stack Quan- tum Computers. PRX Quantum 4, 040319 (2023) https://doi .org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.4.040319

    2023

  102. [112]

    Nature Photonics 18(4), 371–378 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01370-2

    Shen, M., Xie, J., Xu, Y., Wang, S., Cheng, R., Fu, W., Zhou, Y., Tang, H.X.: Photonic link from single-flux-quantum circuits to room temperature. Nature Photonics 18(4), 371–378 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01370-2

    2024 doi

  103. [113]

    Applied Physics Letters 101(4), 042604 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4739454 33

    Jerger, M., Poletto, S., Macha, P., H¨ ubner, U., Il’ichev, E., Ustinov, A.V.: Frequency division multiplexing readout and simultaneous manipulation of an array of flux qubits. Applied Physics Letters 101(4), 042604 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4739454 33

    2012 doi

  104. [114]

    Nature Electronics 6(11), 900–909 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-023-01033-8

    Acharya, R., Brebels, S., Grill, A., Verjauw, J., Ivanov, T., Lozano, D.P., Wan, D., Van Damme, J., Vadiraj, A.M., Mongillo, M., Govoreanu, B., Cran- inckx, J., Radu, I.P., De Greve, K., Gielen, G., Catthoor, F., Potoˇ cnik, A.: Multiplexed superconducting qubit control at mil...

    2023 doi

  105. [115]

    https://www.ibm.com/quantum/ blog/ibm-quantum-roadmap

    IBM Quantum: The IBM Quantum Roadmap. https://www.ibm.com/quantum/ blog/ibm-quantum-roadmap. Accessed: 2024-11-05 (2024) 34

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.