Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Yang-Mills flows for multilayered graphene

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Magic-angle flat bands in twisted graphene are Yang-Mills strata, and degeneracies 3, 6, and 9 are symmetry-forbidden.

desk verdict A genuinely new gauge-theoretic take on chiral-limit TBG magic angles, with a real abstract-bound gap, an internal inconsistency about A1, and a physical-transfer caveat the authors need to own. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19097 v3 pith:IRSTRUX7 submitted 2025-04-27 hep-th cond-mat.supr-con

Vasilii Iugov , Nikita Nekrasov This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.supr-con MSC 53C0714H5281T13
keywords magicanglestwistedbilayergrapheneYang-MillsflowflatbandschirallimittopologicalinvariantsChernnumberquantumanomalousHalleffect
topics Yang-Mills Mass Gap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the magic angles of twisted bilayer and multilayered graphene have a purely geometric origin: they are exactly the values of the twist parameter $\alpha$ for which the effective $SU(2)$ connection $A_{\bar z}(\alpha)$ lies in a special stratum of the Yang-Mills flow on a torus. Because the flow preserves the zero modes of the chiral Dirac operator $D = \bar\partial_{\bar z} + A_{\bar z}$ and its endpoints are classified by an integer flux $q$, a flat band of degeneracy $q$ appears precisely when the connection flows to a Yang-Mills critical point of flux $q$. Applied to the $\mathbb{Z}_6$-symmetric connection of twisted bilayer graphene (TBG), this yields concrete, testable predictions: only degeneracies $q = 3n+1$ and $q = 3n+2$ are allowed, so flat bands of degeneracy $3, 6, 9$ cannot appear under symmetry-preserving perturbations, and the flat band's Berry connection has first Chern class $c_1 = 1$, which explains the observed zero-field quantum anomalous Hall effect. The paper also supplies a numerical algorithm that locates magic angles as eigenvalues of the inverse Dirac operator, a Yang-Mills-energy bound that certifies when a twist angle is not magic, and an explicit demonstration that higher degeneracies like $q = 4$ become reachable when extra symmetric parameters are tuned.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the Yang-Mills flow on the space of $SU(2)$ connections over a torus: the gradient flow of the functional $S_{\mathrm{YM}} = -\int_{T^2} \mathrm{Tr}(F_A \wedge \star F_A)$, which acts by complex gauge transformations and halts at critical points labeled by an integer flux $q \ge 0$. The flow is load-bearing because zero modes of the chiral Dirac operator are carried along it — the wave function evolves by $\dot\psi = i\star F_A \psi$, so its zeros stay intact — which means a connection gives a flat band of degeneracy $q$ exactly when it lies in the cell $\mathcal{A}_q$ of connections that flow to a critical point of flux $q$. Near such a critical point the unstable relevant directions form a $2q$-dimensional complex space, described explicitly by $\theta$-function profiles $\xi_q(z,\bar z) = C e^{\pi(zq+b)(z-\bar z)/\mathrm{Im}\,\tau} \prod_{i=1}^{2q}\theta_1(z-z_i,\tau)$ with $\sum_i z_i = b$; the paper decomposes this tangent space into charge sectors under the $\mathbb{Z}_3$, $\mathbb{Z}_6$, and $\mathbb{Z}_4$ rotational symmetries of the torus, and the allowed $(q, \text{charge})$ pairs follow from the stabilizer actions at the torus's fixed points. The same $\theta$-function technology produces the quasimomentum-dependent wave function $\psi_k$ whose Berry phase yields the flat band's $c_1 = 1$.

What would settle it

Run the paper's own numerical procedure: for a candidate magic angle $\alpha$, compute the eigenvalues of $\bar{\partial}^{-1} \circ A_{\bar z}(\alpha)$ and then simulate the Yang-Mills flow from $A_{\bar z}(\alpha)$; if the endpoint is not a critical connection of flux $q$ with exactly $q$ zero modes for every quasimomentum, or if the zero-mode count changes along the flow, the central identification fails. A complementary experimental test: measure the zero-field Hall conductance of a clean twisted-bilayer sample at the predicted magic angle — a flat band with $c_1 = 1$ must contribute exactly one quantum of Hall conductance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that flat bands in the chiral model of twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) are Yang-Mills connections: a twist parameter $\alpha$ is a magic angle of degeneracy $q$ exactly when the $SU(2)$ connection $A_{\bar z}(\alpha)$ belongs to the stratum $\mathcal{A}_q$ of connections whose Yang-Mills flow ends at a critical point of flux $q$, and in that case $\dim \ker D = q$ for every quasimomentum in the Brillouin zone. Matching the $\mathbb{Z}_6$ rotational symmetry of the TBG connection with the stabilizer actions at the four fixed points of the torus restricts the allowed levels to $q = 3n+1$ and $q = 3n+2$, excluding $q = 3, 6, 9$ under any symmetry-preserving perturbation and making the observed $q = 1$ and $q = 2$ magic angles the generic possibilities in a one-parameter family. The zero-mode wave functions built from elliptic $\theta$ functions then give the flat band's Berry connection a first Chern class $c_1 = 1$ over the Brillouin zone, which the paper identifies as the topological origin of the integer quantum anomalous Hall effect seen in twisted bilayer graphene at zero magnetic field. A companion bound states that no magic angle can occur when the Yang-Mills energy $\|F_{A(\alpha)}\|^2$ falls below the energy of a $U(1)$ flux embedded into $SU(2)$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the chiral-limit Hamiltonian that drops the interlayer AA coupling, and on convergence of the Yang-Mills flow from the TBG connection to a critical stratum (used but not proved for this family); if either gives way, the predicted degeneracies, the $q = 3n$ exclusion, and the $c_1 = 1$ Hall response need not describe real twisted bilayer graphene.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A flat band of degeneracy $q$ is a topological datum, not an accident of band structure: the magic angle is exactly the intersection of the one-parameter family $A_{\bar z}(\alpha)$ with the stratum $\mathcal{A}_q$, so the degeneracy is the flux $q$ of the endpoint of the Yang-Mills flow.
  • Symmetry-preserving perturbations shift the magic angles continuously but cannot create flat bands of degeneracy $3, 6, 9$, since those levels are excluded by the $\mathbb{Z}_6$ symmetry of the TBG connection.
  • Adding symmetric parameters (for example the next harmonic with coupling $\beta$) makes $q = 2$ flat bands generic and brings $q = 4$ into reach at fine-tuned points, so higher-degeneracy flat bands are observable once the right perturbations are tuned.
  • The flat band carries first Chern class $c_1 = 1$, so the integer quantum anomalous Hall effect observed at zero magnetic field has a topological explanation as the emergent $U(1)$ magnetic field of the decomposed bundle.
  • A sufficient no-go test follows from the energy bound: any $\alpha$ whose connection has Yang-Mills energy below the $SU(2)$-embedded $U(1)$ flux value cannot be a magic angle.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the flow's convergence could be proven for the $\alpha$-family, the magic-angle problem would become an intersection-theory problem in the space of connections: counting magic angles with multiplicity would reduce to computing how the one-dimensional complex curve $A_{\bar z}(\alpha)$ crosses the strata $\mathcal{A}_q$, whose codimensions the paper already computes.
  • The stabilizer-matching method should extend to $SU(N)$ multilayered systems: the allowed degeneracies would be dictated by the representation theory of the symmetry group at the fixed points, predicting exclusion rules (for example degeneracies divisible by stabilizer orders) that $N$-layer moiré experiments could test.
  • The paper's observation that each magic angle carries winding number $\pm 1$ of the final flat-connection monodromy suggests a local residue-like invariant attached to each critical $\alpha$, which could be measured directly as a phase winding of the effective Hamiltonian as $\alpha$ circles the magic value.
  • The closing identification of the Yang-Mills flow with an approximation to boundary renormalization-group flow hints that magic angles could be re-read as boundary fixed points of an RG-type flow, a link the paper sketches but does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a gauge-theoretic explanation of magic-angle flat bands in twisted bilayer/multilayer graphene in the chiral limit. The authors identify the chiral Dirac operator D = \bar\partial + A_{\bar z} for the SU(2) connection (5.1) with a connection on a torus, and argue that a twist parameter \alpha is magic of degeneracy q precisely when the Yang-Mills flow carries A_{\hat z}(\alpha) to the Atiyah-Bott stratum A_q, whose critical points are reducible connections L_q \oplus L_{-q}. Under the Z_6 symmetry of the TBG connection, the paper derives selection rules allowing q = 3n+1 and q = 3n+2 and excluding q = 3n. Numerical eigenvalue computations for the family (5.1) and its one-parameter deformation (5.4) report magic angles of multiplicity q=1, q=2, and, at a tuned value of \beta, q=4, consistent with the predicted codimensions. The final section argues that the flat band has first Chern class c_1=1 over the Brillouin zone, and the abstract states a Yang-Mills energy bound that would rule out magic behavior.

Significance. If the central identification is correct, the paper provides a genuinely new geometric picture: magic angles are interpreted as intersections of a one-parameter family of connections with the cells of the Atiyah-Bott stratification of the space of SU(2) connections on a torus. The explicit formulas for relevant perturbations, the Z_6-equivariant codimension count, and the numerical confirmation of the predicted q values are concrete strengths, and the exclusion of q=3n is a falsifiable prediction within the chiral model. The c_1=1 Berry-phase computation offers a structural explanation of the observed zero-field quantum anomalous Hall response, assuming the chiral-limit zero-mode structure survives the omitted interlayer AA coupling. The main limitation is that almost every physical conclusion is a statement about the chiral operator (1.1), and the paper does not establish that the predictions transfer to the full Bistritzer-MacDonald model.

major comments (5)
  1. [Introduction, preview of Section 5] The introduction states that numerical computation finds 'all of the magic angles in the complex \alpha plane correspond to points in A_1', but Section 5.2 and Fig. 5 report magic angles of both q=1 and q=2 (and q=4 for a tuned \beta), and the same introduction promises multiplicities q=1 and q=2. Since the distinction between q=1 and q=2 is central to the paper's selection rule, this contradiction must be resolved; the A_1 statement should either be removed or explicitly restricted to a subclass of magic angles.
  2. [Abstract (YM energy bound)] The abstract's headline bound -- that \alpha is not magic if \|F_{A(\alpha)}\|^2 is smaller than the Yang-Mills energy of an embedded U(1) flux -- is never stated as a proposition or derived anywhere in Sections 2-6. The body contains the flow, the stratification, and the codimension count, but no inequality relating S_{YM}(A(\alpha)) to the existence of zero modes. As a claimed result it needs a proof, a precise statement of the comparison bundle, or removal from the abstract.
  3. [Section 1 and Sections 5.1-5.4 (chiral-limit scope)] All physical predictions -- the q=3n+1/3n+2 degeneracy selection, the exclusion of q=3n, and the c_1=1 Berry phase -- are derived for the chiral Hamiltonian (1.1), obtained by dropping the interlayer AA coupling. The paper gives no argument that the zero-mode count, the symmetry-eigenvalue selection, or the Chern number survive when the AA coupling is restored in the full Bistritzer-MacDonald operator. The perturbation family (5.4) also stays inside the chiral class A(P). Without such an argument, the conclusions about twisted bilayer graphene remain conditional on the chiral approximation.
  4. [Section 3.3 and Section 5.2 (convergence of the Yang-Mills flow)] The identification of magic angles with strata A_q rests on the assertion in Section 3.3 that connections flowing to M_q satisfy dim_C ker D_A = q, and on preservation of zero modes along the flow. The preservation argument in Section 5.2, via \dot\psi = i \star F_A \psi, is heuristic, and convergence of the flow for the specific families (5.1) and (5.4) is not proved; Appendix A reports a numerical simulation but no convergence theorem or quantitative convergence criterion. If the limiting complex gauge transformation is not invertible, the zero-mode count could in principle change at the endpoint. A precise convergence statement, with a citation or proof, is needed to make the equivalence load-bearing.
  5. [Section 5.1 (congruence derivation of q selection)] The step 'It follows that [k]_6 = [\pm 3/2]_6' from [4k]_6 = [0]_6 is not correct as written: in the half-integer normalization the congruence [4k]_6 = [0]_6 also admits solutions such as k\equiv 0 and k\equiv 3 (mod 6). These candidates are later killed by the z_2 and z_3 stabilizer equations, so the final q=3n+1,3n+2 conclusion may still be correct, but the derivation as written omits that additional check. The authors should expand the congruence argument so that the exclusion of q=3n is actually demonstrated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Various pages] There are numerous typos and formatting errors, including 'algrorithm' (Appendix A), 'structre' (Section 1), 'posessing' (Introduction), 'graphere' (Section 4.6), and 'Theses' (Conclusions). These should be corrected in a revision.
  2. [Appendix A and Figure 5] The numerical section does not state the grid resolution, truncation parameters, eigenvalue solver tolerances, or convergence checks used for the discretized Yang-Mills flow and for the inverse-eigenvalue computation. Without these details the numerical confirmation is hard to reproduce or assess.
  3. [Section 3.3] The notation A_q is used both for the Atiyah-Bott stratum of connections flowing to M_q and, later, for the symmetry-restricted stratum A^\Gamma_q. The relation between A_q, M_q, and the closure statement A_q \supset A_{q+1} should be stated more carefully, since the stratification is central to the paper.
  4. [Figure 6] The color scale and normalization of the plotted |\xi_q(z,\bar z)| and |\dot A| fields are not specified, making the claimed match between theoretical divisors and numerical relevant perturbations harder to verify. A color bar and a statement of the normalization convention would help.
  5. [Section 5.4] The transition functions (5.12) and the normalization of \psi_k in (5.10) are asserted without derivation. Since the c_1=1 claim is a main physical output, the calculation should either be shown or the reader should be referred to a derivation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Derivation is self-contained: the YM-flow identification and the symmetry selection of q values are genuine outputs, and the numerical checks reuse the zero-mode condition only as a computational probe.

full rationale

No significant circularity is present. The central identification 'magic angle of degeneracy q iff A lies in the YM stratum A_q' is derived in the paper, not assumed: the Yang-Mills flow acts by complex gauge transformations (Eq. 2.8), which preserve the zero-mode equation (1.11), and the critical connections in C_q are shown by explicit theta-function analysis (Eqs. 3.4-3.6) to have a q-dimensional kernel. The allowed degeneracies q = 3n+1 and q = 3n+2, and the exclusion of q = 3n, follow from a group-theoretic matching of the TBG symmetry (Eq. 5.3) with the stabilizer data in Tables 2-3; this is an independent constraint, not a restatement of the numerical input. The c1 = 1 Berry-phase result is computed explicitly from the transition functions in Eqs. (5.12)-(5.13), again not assumed. The numerical search for magic angles as reciprocals of eigenvalues of -bar-delta^{-1} A_z is a direct reformulation of the zero-mode condition and is used only to locate and label the critical points; the theoretical predictions about which q values can appear, their codimensions, and the Chern class are not fitted to those eigenvalues. The chiral-limit Hamiltonian (1.1) and the dependence on neglecting AA coupling are explicit modeling assumptions imported from external literature; this is a correctness/validity concern for real TBG, but it is not a circular reduction of the paper's internal derivation. External citations (Atiyah-Bott, Tarnopolsky et al.) are standard and are not self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or mediators are postulated. The emergent U(1) Berry connection with c1=1 is a derived quantity, not a fitted entity. The free parameter β is introduced only to probe the codimension structure and is explicitly tuned.

free parameters (1)
  • β = ≈1.298 (numerically tuned)
    Coefficient of the second harmonic in the perturbed potential (5.4). The value at which a q=4 magic angle appears is found by tuning, not predicted; used only to illustrate the codimension-2 requirement.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Atiyah-Bott classification and stratification of SU(2) connections on a Riemann surface by Yang-Mills flow
    Invoked throughout Sections 2-3 as the external mathematical backbone; the paper cites [1,2] but does not prove these theorems.
  • domain assumption Chiral-limit Hamiltonian (1.1) approximates twisted bilayer graphene
    Section 1 drops the interlayer AA coupling; all quantitative predictions are for this model.
  • domain assumption The Yang-Mills flow from A_ẑ(α) converges to a critical stratum C_q and preserves the zero-mode count
    Used in Sections 3.3 and 5 to transfer the kernel of the Dirac operator from the initial connection to the endpoint; convergence is assumed rather than proven for this family.
  • domain assumption The Z6 symmetry action (5.3) on the TBG connection matches the diagonal-gauge lift with k=3/2
    Section 5.1 solves consistency equations for k and q; the match to Table 4 is used to predict allowed q values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Yang-Mills flows for multilayered graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IRSTRUX7

@misc{pith2026250419097,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Yang-Mills flows for multilayered graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IRSTRUX7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19097}
}
abstract

We clarify the origin of magic angles in twisted multilayered graphene using Yang-Mills flows in two dimensions. We relate the effective Hamiltonian describing the electrons in the multilayered graphene to the ${\bar\partial}_{A}$ operator on a two dimensional torus coupled to an $SU(N)$ gauge field. Despite the absence of a characteristic class such as $c_{1}$ relevant for the quantum Hall effect, we show that there are topological invariants associated with the zero modes occuring in a family of Hamiltonians. The flatbands in the spectrum of the effective Hamiltonian are associated with Yang-Mills connections, studied by M.Atiyah and R.Bott long time ago. The emergent $U(1)$ magnetic field with nonzero flux is presumably responsible for the observed Hall effect in the absence of (external) magnetic field. We provide a numeric algorithm transforming the original single-particle Hamiltonian to the direct sum of ${\bar\partial}_{A}$ operators coupled to abelian gauge fields with non-zero $c_1$'s. Our perspective gives a simple bound for magic angles: if the gauge field $A({\alpha})$ is such that the YM energy $\Vert F_{A({\alpha})} \Vert^2$ is smaller than that of $U(1)$ magnetic flux embedded into $SU(2)$, then $\alpha$ is not magic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19097 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The case τ = e πi/3 (a) f(z) = θ 2 1 (z; τ ) (4.12) (b) f(z) = θ1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Plots of normalized |ξ(z, z¯)| for τ = e πi 3 , q = 1 and symmetric choices of zeros 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Different orbits of Z6 in different colors: one each of sizes 1 (red), 2 (orange), 3 (green), 6 (blue) For a generic q, any function of the form (3.6) with a Z3-invariant divisor Z = (zj ) of zeros is an eigenfunction of the symmetry. Its charge under rotations z 7→ τ 2 z is determined by the multiplicity of its zero at z = 0. E.g. for q = 1, (4.12) has charge 2 under rotations, and (4.13) has charge 0. Thus, the sp… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Orbits of Z4 for τ = i: one-point orbits are represented by red circles and a four-point orbit is represented by blue squares breaking the Z6 symmetry. In that case, the space of relevant deformations split as T + A0A(P) ≃ C 2q = O n1∈{0,1,2} n2∈{0,1} C ⌊ 2q−2n1−3n2 6 …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Values of α corresponding to flat bands of degeneracy q for perturbed connections (5.4) for different β. In other words, values of α for which αAz, ¯ (β) lies in Aq. connection has the monodromy around the a-cycle of the form (See Appendix B for derivation) Ma = [PITH…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Absolute values of the relevant perturbations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Connection a-cycle monodromy phase ϕ (as indicated on the curved lines) at t → ∞ (compare to [3], [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Definitions of monodromies M1, M2, M3 and M4 Now, consider a connection with a larger Z6 symmetry that acts according to (5.3) (notice that this action contains the Z3 group action studied above). It imposes an additional constraint on the monodromies: M4 = T −1M−1 1 T…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Yang-Mills and bundles over algebraic curves.Proc

    Michael Atiyah and Raoul Bott. Yang-Mills and bundles over algebraic curves.Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.), 90(1):11–20, 1981

    work page 1981

  2. [2]

    The Yang-Mills equations over Riemann surfaces.Phil

    Michael Atiyah and Raoul Bott. The Yang-Mills equations over Riemann surfaces.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, (A 308):532–615, 1983

    work page 1983

  3. [3]

    Spectral characterization of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene.Phys

    Simon Becker, Mark Embree, Jens Wittsten, and Maciej Zworski. Spectral characterization of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene.Phys. Rev. B, 103:165113, Apr 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Mathematics of magic angles in amodel oftwisted bilayergraphene.Probability and Mathematical Physics, 3(1):69–103, May 2022

    Simon Becker, Mark Embree, Jens Wittsten, and Maciej Zworski. Mathematics of magic angles in amodel oftwisted bilayergraphene.Probability and Mathematical Physics, 3(1):69–103, May 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Degenerate flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene

    Simon Becker, Tristan Humbert, and Maciej Zworski. Degenerate flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene. 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    MacDonald

    Rafi Bistritzer and Allan H. MacDonald. Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 108(30):12233, 2011

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices

    Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Shiang Fang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Efthimios Kaxi- ras, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature, 556(7699):43–50, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    A new proof of a theorem of Narasimhan and Seshadri

    Simon Donaldson. A new proof of a theorem of Narasimhan and Seshadri. (18, no. 2):269–277, 1983

    work page 1983

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    Intrinsically multilayer moiré heterostructures.Physical Review B, 107, 06 2023

    Aaron Dunbrack and Jennifer Cano. Intrinsically multilayer moiré heterostructures.Physical Review B, 107, 06 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Gauge Theory and Langlands Duality

    Edward Frenkel. Gauge Theory and Langlands Duality. InBourbaki Seminar, 6 2009

    2009

  3. [11]

    Nonlinear Models in2 +ϵ Dimensions

    Dan Friedan. Nonlinear Models in2 +ϵ Dimensions. Annals Phys., 163:318, 1985

    1985

  4. [12]

    Gerasimov

    A. Gerasimov. Localization in GWZW and Verlinde formula. 5 1993. 28

    1993

  5. [13]

    Gross and Andrei Matytsin

    David J. Gross and Andrei Matytsin. Some properties of large N two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory. Nucl. Phys. B, 437:541–584, 1995

    1995

  6. [14]

    Hiroki Isobe, Noah F. Q. Yuan, and Liang Fu. Unconventional Superconductivity and Density Waves in Twisted Bilayer Graphene.Physical Review X, 8(4):041041, October 2018

    2018

  7. [15]

    The Yang-Mills flow and the Atiyah-Bott formula on compact Kahler manifolds

    Adam Jacob. The Yang-Mills flow and the Atiyah-Bott formula on compact Kahler manifolds. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1109.1550, September 2011

    2011 arXiv

  8. [16]

    In a Twist, Composite Fermions Form and Flow without a Magnetic Field

    Jainendra Jain. In a Twist, Composite Fermions Form and Flow without a Magnetic Field. Physics, 16:163, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. Castro Neto. Graphene Bilayer with a Twist: Electronic Structure.Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:256802, Dec 2007

    2007

  10. [18]

    Reddy, Jixiang Yang, Junseok Seo, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Liang Fu, and Long Ju

    Zhengguang Lu, Tonghang Han, Yuxuan Yao, Aidan P. Reddy, Jixiang Yang, Junseok Seo, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Liang Fu, and Long Ju. Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene.Nature, 626:759764, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Qian Niu, D. J. Thouless, and Yong-Shi Wu. Quantized hall conductance as a topological invariant. Phys. Rev. B, 31:3372–3377, Mar 1985

    1985

  12. [20]

    Zero Flux Localization: Magic Revealed

    Alireza Parhizkar and Victor Galitski. Zero Flux Localization: Magic Revealed. 9 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect.Nature, 622:074079, 2023

    Heonjoon Park Park, Jiaqi Cai, Eric Anderson, Yinong Zhang, Jiayi Zhu, Xiaoyu Liu, Chong Wang, William Holtzmann, Chaowei Hu, Zhaoyu Liu, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Jiun-HawChu, TingCao, LiangFu, WangYao, DavidChang, Cui-ZuandCobden, DiXiao, and Xiaodong Xu. Observatio...

    2023

  14. [22]

    Senthil, and Ashvin Vishwanath

    Hoi Chun Po, Liujun Zou, T. Senthil, and Ashvin Vishwanath. Faithful Tight-binding Models and Fragile Topology of Magic-angle Bilayer Graphene.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1808.02482, August 2018

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Popov and Alexey Milekhin

    Fedor K. Popov and Alexey Milekhin. Hidden wave function of twisted bilayer graphene: The flat band as a Landau level.Phys. Rev. B, 103(15):155150, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Non-Abelian gauge potentials in graphene bilayers.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1110.2883, October 2011

    Pablo San-Jose, Jose Gonzalez, and Francisco Guinea. Non-Abelian gauge potentials in graphene bilayers.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1110.2883, October 2011

    2011 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Schmitt et al

    A. Schmitt et al. Mesoscopic Klein-Schwinger effect in graphene.Nature Phys., 19(6):830–835, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    String theory and noncommutative geometry.JHEP, 09:032, 1999

    Nathan Seiberg and Edward Witten. String theory and noncommutative geometry.JHEP, 09:032, 1999

    1999

  19. [27]

    Semenoff

    Gordon W. Semenoff. Condensed Matter Simulation of a Three-dimensional Anomaly.Phys. Rev. Lett., 53:2449, 1984

    1984

  20. [28]

    Origin of Magic Angles in Twisted Bilayer Graphene.Physical Review Letters, 122(10), 2019

    Grigory Tarnopolsky, Alex Jura Kruchkov, and Ashvin Vishwanath. Origin of Magic Angles in Twisted Bilayer Graphene.Physical Review Letters, 122(10), 2019. 29

    2019

  21. [29]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs. Quantized hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential.Phys. Rev. Lett., 49:405–408, Aug 1982

    1982

  22. [30]

    The Verlinde algebra and the cohomology of the Grassmannian

    Edward Witten. The Verlinde algebra and the cohomology of the Grassmannian. 12 1993

    1993

  23. [31]

    Observation of Integer and Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effects in Twisted Bilayermote2

    FanXu, ZhengSun, TongtongJia, ChangLiu, ChengXu, ChushanLi, YuGu, KenjiWatanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Bingbing Tong, Jinfeng Jia, Zhiwen Shi, Shengwei Jiang, Yang Zhang, Xiaoxue Liu, and Tingxin Li. Observation of Integer and Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effects in Twisted ...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.