REVIEW 2 cited by
BLADE: Benchmark suite for LLM-driven Automated Design and Evolution of iterative optimisation heuristics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Automated Algorithm Discovery (AAD), particularly for optimisation heuristics, is an emerging field of research. This emergence necessitates robust, standardised benchmarking practices to rigorously evaluate the capabilities and limitations of LLM-driven AAD methods and the resulting generated algorithms, especially given the opacity of their design process and known issues with existing benchmarks. To address this need, we introduce BLADE (Benchmark suite for LLM-driven Automated Design and Evolution), a modular and extensible framework specifically designed for benchmarking LLM-driven AAD methods in a continuous black-box optimisation context. BLADE integrates collections of benchmark problems (including MA-BBOB and SBOX-COST among others) with instance generators and textual descriptions aimed at capability-focused testing, such as generalisation, specialisation and information exploitation. It offers flexible experimental setup options, standardised logging for reproducibility and fair comparison, incorporates methods for analysing the AAD process (e.g., Code Evolution Graphs and various visualisation approaches) and facilitates comparison against human-designed baselines through integration with established tools like IOHanalyser and IOHexplainer. BLADE provides an `out-of-the-box' solution to systematically evaluate LLM-driven AAD approaches. The framework is demonstrated through two distinct use cases exploring mutation prompt strategies and function specialisation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Behaviour Space Analysis of LLM-driven Meta-heuristic Discovery
Comparing six LLaMEA prompt and selection variants on 5D BBOB problems, the 1+1 elitist variant using both simplify and random-perturbation prompts produced the best anytime performance, and behaviour metrics link thi...
-
Evolutionary Computation and Large Language Models: A Survey of Methods, Synergies, and Applications
A survey that maps bidirectional synergies between evolutionary computation and large language models and proposes a taxonomy plus research gaps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.