REVIEW 2 cited by
Quantum Hypothesis Testing Lemma for Deterministic Identification over Quantum Channels
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In our previous work, we presented the \emph{Hypothesis Testing Lemma}, a key tool that establishes sufficient conditions for the existence of good deterministic identification (DI) codes for memoryless channels with finite output, but arbitrary input alphabets. In this work, we provide a full quantum analogue of this lemma, which shows that the existence of a DI code in the quantum setting follows from a suitable packing in a modified space of output quantum states. Specifically, we demonstrate that such a code can be constructed using product states derived from this packing. This result enables us to tighten the capacity lower bound for DI over quantum channels beyond the simultaneous decoding approach. In particular, we can now express these bounds solely in terms of the Minkowski dimension of a certain state space, giving us new insights to better understand the nature of the protocol, and the separation between simultaneous and non-simultaneous codes. We extend the discussion with a particular channel example for which we can construct an optimum code.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Deterministic identification for Bernoulli channels and related channels with continuous input
Deterministic identification capacity Ċ_DI(W) equals exactly 1/2 for Bernoulli channels and channels reducible to them via continuous output distribution curves.
-
Optimal Codes for Deterministic Identification over Gaussian Channels: Closing the Capacity Gap
The linearithmic deterministic identification capacity of Gaussian channels is 1/2, achieved by an optimized code that matches the upper bound and closes gaps in rate-reliability tradeoffs for all error regimes.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.