Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 176 references

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Resources Allocation Optimization: A Survey

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A survey of MARL for resource allocation builds a taxonomy by challenge and training paradigm.

desk verdict A useful but uneven survey: the benchmark pointers and MARL foundations are solid, but the 'comprehensive' claim is not yet auditable because the literature selection is undocumented and Table 3 disagrees with the prose. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.21048 v1 pith:3WTGS3GL submitted 2025-04-29 cs.MA cs.AIcs.LG

Mohamad A. Hady , Siyi Hu , Mahardhika Pratama , Jimmy Cao , Ryszard Kowalczyk This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.MAcs.AIcs.LG
keywords multi-agentreinforcementlearningresourceallocationoptimizationsurveytaxonomycentralizedtrainingdecentralizedexecutionpartialobservabilityscalabilitybenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), the paper argues, is the right tool for resource allocation optimization (RAO) in modern dynamic systems because it targets the four weaknesses of classical methods: rapid change, partial observability, large scale, and heterogeneity. The survey organizes recent work across telecommunications, energy, distributed computing, transportation, and manufacturing into a structured taxonomy based on training paradigms (CTCE, DTDE, CTDE) and recurring challenges. It identifies centralized training with decentralized execution (CTDE) as the most flexible and widely used paradigm for RAO, and it lists four publicly available benchmarks for evaluating algorithms before deployment. If this mapping is correct, the survey gives practitioners a practical starting point for choosing a MARL approach and gives researchers a shared reference for where the gaps are.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing organizing device is the three-way taxonomy of MARL training and execution paradigms: centralized training and centralized execution (CTCE), decentralized training and decentralized execution (DTDE), and centralized training with decentralized execution (CTDE). The survey uses this taxonomy, together with the Decentralized Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (Dec-POMDP) formalism, to map each application to a mechanism: CTCE for small fully coordinated systems, DTDE for privacy-sensitive or highly distributed settings, and CTDE as the workhorse that combines global coordination with local autonomy. The other half of the machinery is the four-category challenge schema, which groups the literature by adaptability, partial observability, scalability, and heterogeneity.

What would settle it

Run a systematic, preregistered literature search on MARL for resource allocation with explicit inclusion criteria and a fixed time window; if the resulting corpus contains major application areas or algorithm families that the survey's four-challenge taxonomy cannot accommodate, the survey's representativeness claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that MARL is the appropriate toolkit for modern RAO because it answers exactly the four limitations that sink classical methods: rapid change, partial observability, large scale, and heterogeneity. The survey organizes recent literature into a taxonomy by application domain and by training paradigm, and it identifies a set of four public benchmarks. It also reports that CTDE is the dominant paradigm for RAO, since centralized training gives agents a global view during learning while decentralized execution keeps them scalable and responsive at deployment time. The paper presents this as a synthesis of the current research landscape rather than as a new algorithm or experimental result.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's claim to be comprehensive depends on the papers it selected for Section 4.1 being representative of the field, and it does not state a search strategy, inclusion criteria, or time window.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CTDE emerges as the default starting paradigm for RAO problems where both global coordination and scalability matter, because it trains with global information and executes on local observations.
  • The four public benchmarks give the field a common testbed for comparing MARL algorithms before deployment, covering satellite tasking, power-grid voltage control, traffic signal control, and container-based waste processing.
  • Classical methods such as linear programming, heuristics, and game theory should be treated as baselines rather than competitors in dynamic RAO, since the survey identifies their core limitations as static assumptions, centralization, and poor scaling.
  • Graph-based MARL appears across energy, manufacturing, and mobile networks, indicating that modeling inter-agent relationships is becoming a standard tool for RAO.
  • Value decomposition methods such as QMIX are available for credit assignment in cooperative RAO but remain underused compared with centralized-critic methods, and the paper notes there is no guarantee they converge to a global optimum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable design rule follows from the survey's examples even though the paper does not state it: choose DTDE when communication cost or privacy dominates, and CTDE when system-level optimality dominates.
  • Because the four benchmarks use different tasks and metrics, the survey cannot support cross-domain algorithm rankings; a unified RAO benchmark suite would be the next step toward validating its taxonomy.
  • The recurring appearance of graph-based MARL across domains suggests that relational structure, not raw state vectors, may be the common substrate of RAO, and a cross-domain transfer experiment could test this directly.
  • The survey's challenge categories imply that partial observability and adaptability are coupled: partial information slows adaptation, so methods that improve observability may improve adaptability without extra machinery.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This survey reviews recent multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods for resource allocation optimization (RAO). The paper introduces classical RAO approaches and their limitations, gives a brief formal foundation of RL and MARL (MDPs, stochastic games, Dec-POMDPs, training paradigms), and then surveys MARL applications across telecommunications, energy, distributed computing, transportation, and manufacturing. It organizes the literature into an application-based taxonomy (Table 3), associates the surveyed works with four RAO challenge categories (adaptability, partial observability, large scale, heterogeneity), lists four publicly available RAO-related benchmarks with code links, and closes with future research directions.

Significance. If its corpus is representative, the survey fills a genuine gap by consolidating recent MARL-for-RAO work into a structured taxonomy and pointing practitioners to four usable benchmarks (BSK-RL, Power Distribution Networks, CityFlow, ContainerGym). The standard RL/MARL equations in Section 3 are reproduced correctly, and the domain summaries generally match the stated contributions of the cited papers. The benchmark section is a practical strength because it ships code links and names tested algorithms in Table 4. However, the survey's central claim of being 'comprehensive' is currently not auditable: the paper-selection process is undocumented, and the main taxonomy table is not derivable from the prose that accompanies it. These issues weaken the paper as a reference until the methodology and internal consistency are fixed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1 / Section 1] The 'comprehensive review' claim is not auditable because the paper never documents its literature-selection process. Section 4.1 presents the corpus in Table 3 without stating the search databases, keyword sets, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or the time window covered by 'recent'; Section 1's phrase 'selecting high-impact studies' is not operationalized. Since the taxonomy and prevalence statements in Section 4.2 are derived entirely from this undocumented corpus, a differently selected corpus could plausibly produce a different taxonomy. The authors should add a methodology subsection describing the search and selection protocol.
  2. [Table 3 vs Section 4.1.2] Table 3 is not derivable from the prose it summarizes. For example, the Renewable Energy row omits MAAC (Jayanetti et al. 2024) even though Section 4.1.2 explicitly describes it; the Smart Grid row lists only MAPPO while Section 4.1.2 discusses MADQN (Kumari et al. 2024); the Mobile Edge Computing row omits MATD3 (Zhao et al. 2022) and Com-DDPG (Gao et al. 2023), both described in Section 4.1.3; and the Autonomous Vehicles row lists MADDPG and MADQRL with no supporting discussion in Section 4.1.4. The reader cannot trust the taxonomy until the table and text are reconciled.
  3. [Section 4.2.1 vs Section 4.1.3] There is an internal contradiction about Jain and Kumar (2023). Section 4.2.1 describes the work as a fully centralized MARL method evaluated with DQN, DDPG, and SAC, while Section 4.1.3 lists it as using the MAAC algorithm. These are incompatible descriptions of the same paper, and this inconsistency undermines the reliability of both the challenge analysis and the application taxonomy.
  4. [Section 4.2.3] The statement 'Currently, VD has been rarely used in RAO' is an unsupported prevalence claim. It is based on a single citation (Ahmed et al. 2023) and there is no quantitative count of value-decomposition papers in the corpus, which is itself undocumented. Either qualify the statement as an observation about the present selection or provide a systematic count.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1.1] The displayed constraint 'Pn i=1 xi ≤ N' appears with unrendered LaTeX markup; please format it properly.
  2. [Section 4.1.2] Several citations repeat the author name awkwardly, e.g., 'Chen et al. Chen et al. (2022)', 'Wang et al. Wang et al. (2021)', and 'Xu et al. Xu et al. (2020)'; these should be cleaned to a single citation form.
  3. [References] Halabian (2019a) and Halabian (2019b) share the same title and DOI but are listed as two distinct entries; please merge or differentiate them.
  4. [Section 5.3 / Table 4] The 'Traffic Management' entry in Table 4 lists 'Graph based MARL' without naming a specific algorithm; since the surrounding text mentions CityFlow and PressLight, please specify which algorithm was actually tested.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detected: the survey makes no quantitative predictions and its taxonomy is an organizational choice, not a result derived from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

This manuscript is a literature survey, not a derivation. It contains no fitted parameters, no predictive model, and no equations whose outputs are defined in terms of the quantities they claim to predict. The abstract's claim to provide 'a comprehensive review of recent MARL algorithms for RAO' is a claim about coverage and synthesis, not a derived numerical result; it is assessed against the external literature rather than by construction from the paper's own inputs. The organizing taxonomy in Table 3 and the challenge analysis in Section 4 are presentation choices over a selected corpus, and any weaknesses in corpus selection would affect representativeness and auditability, not circularity. Inconsistencies between Table 3 and the Section 4.1 prose (e.g., MAAC in the Renewable Energy text but omitted from the table, or MADQN in the Smart Grid text but absent from the table) are correctness and quality problems, but they do not establish that any claimed result reduces to its own input. The paper also does not rely on a load-bearing self-citation chain: the cited works are external papers, and the few 'Hu et al.' references in the text do not correspond to the present authors' prior results being invoked to force a conclusion. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or renamed empirical pattern is imported from the authors' own prior work. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey adds no parameters or entities; its central claims rest on the correctness of the standard RL/MARL background and on the fidelity of its reading of the cited literature.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math The Bellman equations and the deep RL objective formulas in Section 3 are standard background and are correctly reproduced.
    Section 3.1 uses these equations as the foundation for describing MARL; the survey does not prove them but relies on their accepted correctness.
  • domain assumption The summarized primary studies in Section 4.1 accurately report their algorithms and performance.
    The survey's domain-level claims, such as which algorithm was used in which application, are taken from the cited papers without independent verification.
  • ad hoc to paper The five application categories and four challenge categories form an adequate organizing scheme for MARL-RAO research.
    Section 4 imposes this taxonomy onto the literature, but no evidence or prior framework is given to show it is the most natural or complete grouping.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Resources Allocation Optimization: A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3WTGS3GL

@misc{pith2026250421048,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Resources Allocation Optimization: A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3WTGS3GL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.21048}
}
read the original abstract

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) has become a powerful framework for numerous real-world applications, modeling distributed decision-making and learning from interactions with complex environments. Resource Allocation Optimization (RAO) benefits significantly from MARL's ability to tackle dynamic and decentralized contexts. MARL-based approaches are increasingly applied to RAO challenges across sectors playing pivotal roles to Industry 4.0 developments. This survey provides a comprehensive review of recent MARL algorithms for RAO, encompassing core concepts, classifications, and a structured taxonomy. By outlining the current research landscape and identifying primary challenges and future directions, this survey aims to support researchers and practitioners in leveraging MARL's potential to advance resource allocation solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline " cite write " FUNCTION editor.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION editor.trans.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION trans.postfix translator num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION authors.editors.reflist.apa5 'field := 'dot := field num.names 'numnames := numnames 'format.num.names := format.num.names na...

  2. [2]

    sn-aps.bst

    FUNCTION identify.aps.version "sn-aps.bst" " [2024/07/19 v1.1 APS bibliography style]" * top ENTRY address author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year eprint archive archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version lab...

    2024

  3. [3]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or or or or FUNCTION n.separate 't := "" #0 'numnames := t empty not t #-1 #1 subs...

  4. [4]

    sn-basic.bst

    FUNCTION identify.basic.version "sn-basic.bst" " [2024/07/19 v1.1 bibliography style]" * top ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version lab...

    2024

  5. [5]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or or or or FUNCTION ...

  6. [6]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION output.doi doi empty skip "doi:" doi * "" * output if FUNCTION format.archive archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if FUNCTION format.primaryClass primaryClass empty "" " [" primaryClass * "] " * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archive empty " https://arxiv.org/abs/" eprint * " " * " ...

  7. [7]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTION find.integer 't := #0 'int := int not t empty not and t #1 #1 substring 's :=...

  8. [8]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTION find.integer 't := #0 'int := int not t empty not and t #1 #1 substring 's :=...

Show all 176 references
  1. [9]

    sn-nature.bst

    FUNCTION identify.nature.version "sn-nature.bst" " [2024/07/19 v1.1 bibliography style]" * top ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title ...

    2024

  2. [10]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  3. [11]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  4. [12]

    sn-vancouver-num.bst

    FUNCTION identify.vancouver.version "sn-vancouver-num.bst" " [2024/07/19 v1.1 Vancouver bibliography style]" * top ENTRY address assignee author booktitle chapter cartographer day edition editor howpublished institution inventor journal key keywords month note number organizat...

    2024

  5. [13]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  6. [14]

    Abid, M.S., H.J. Apon, S. Hossain, A. Ahmed, R. Ahshan, and M.H. Lipu. 2024. A novel multi-objective optimization based multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach for microgrid resources planning. Applied Energy\/ 353: 122029

    2024

  7. [15]

    Liu, M.A

    Ahmed, M., J. Liu, M.A. Mirza, W.U. Khan, and F.N. Al-Wesabi. 2023. Marl based resource allocation scheme leveraging vehicular cloudlet in automotive-industry 5.0. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences\/ 35\/ (6): 101420

    2023

  8. [16]

    Rastegar, and A.R

    Ahrarinouri, M., M. Rastegar, and A.R. Seifi. 2020. Multiagent reinforcement learning for energy management in residential buildings. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics\/ 17\/ (1): 659--666

    2020

  9. [17]

    St-Hilaire, and T

    Alam, M.R., M. St-Hilaire, and T. Kunz. 2016. Computational methods for residential energy cost optimization in smart grids: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)\/ 49\/ (1): 1--34

    2016

  10. [18]

    Alcaraz, J. and C. Maroto. 2001. A robust genetic algorithm for resource allocation in project scheduling. Annals of operations Research\/ 102: 83--109

    2001

  11. [19]

    Abdellatif, N

    Allahham, M.S., A.A. Abdellatif, N. Mhaisen, A. Mohamed, A. Erbad, and M. Guizani. 2022. Multi-agent reinforcement learning for network selection and resource allocation in heterogeneous multi-rat networks. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking\/ 8\/ (2)...

    2022

  12. [20]

    Antonio, G.P. and C. Maria-Dolores. 2022. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning to manage connected autonomous vehicles at tomorrow's intersections. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology\/ 71\/ (7): 7033--7043

    2022

  13. [21]

    Attiya, G. and Y. Hamam. 2006. Task allocation for maximizing reliability of distributed systems: A simulated annealing approach. Journal of parallel and Distributed Computing\/ 66\/ (10): 1259--1266

    2006

  14. [22]

    Kanitscheider, T

    Baker, B., I. Kanitscheider, T. Markov, Y. Wu, G. Powell, B. McGrew, and I. Mordatch 2020. Emergent tool use from multi-agent autocurricula. In International Conference on Learning Representations

    2020

  15. [23]

    Bi, J., H. Yuan, S. Duanmu, M. Zhou, and A. Abusorrah. 2020. Energy-optimized partial computation offloading in mobile-edge computing with genetic simulated-annealing-based particle swarm optimization. IEEE Internet of Things Journal\/ 8\/ (5): 3774--3785

    2020

  16. [24]

    Bratton, D. and J. Kennedy 2007. Defining a standard for particle swarm optimization. In 2007 IEEE swarm intelligence symposium , pp.\ 120--127. IEEE

    2007

  17. [25]

    Bu, L., R. Babu, B. De Schutter, et al. 2008. A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, Appl., Rev.\/ 38\/ (2): 156--172

    2008

  18. [26]

    Cao, Z., P. Zhou, R. Li, S. Huang, and D. Wu. 2020. Multiagent deep reinforcement learning for joint multichannel access and task offloading of mobile-edge computing in industry 4.0. IEEE Internet of Things Journal\/ 7\/ (7): 6201--6213

    2020

  19. [27]

    Galinho, and J.P

    Cardon, A., T. Galinho, and J.P. Vacher. 2000. Genetic algorithms using multi-objectives in a multi-agent system. Robotics and Autonomous systems\/ 33\/ (2-3): 179--190

    2000

  20. [28]

    Malanchini, and A

    Cesana, M., I. Malanchini, and A. Capone 2008. Modelling network selection and resource allocation in wireless access networks with non-cooperative games. In 2008 5th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems , pp.\ 404--409. IEEE

    2008

  21. [29]

    Morstyn, and M.D

    Charbonnier, F., T. Morstyn, and M.D. McCulloch. 2022. Scalable multi-agent reinforcement learning for distributed control of residential energy flexibility. Applied Energy\/ 314: 118825

    2022

  22. [30]

    Hajidavalloo, Z

    Chen, D., M.R. Hajidavalloo, Z. Li, K. Chen, Y. Wang, L. Jiang, and Y. Wang. 2023. Deep multi-agent reinforcement learning for highway on-ramp merging in mixed traffic. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems\/ 24\/ (11): 11623--11638

    2023

  23. [31]

    G \"u nd \"u z, K

    Chen, M., D. G \"u nd \"u z, K. Huang, W. Saad, M. Bennis, A.V. Feljan, and H.V. Poor. 2021. Distributed learning in wireless networks: Recent progress and future challenges. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications\/ 39\/ (12): 3579--3605

    2021

  24. [32]

    Chen, P., S. Liu, X. Wang, and I. Kamwa. 2022. Physics-shielded multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for safe active voltage control with photovoltaic/battery energy storage systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid\/ 14\/ (4): 2656--2667

    2022

  25. [33]

    Chen, S., J. Dong, P. Ha, Y. Li, and S. Labi. 2021. Graph neural network and reinforcement learning for multi-agent cooperative control of connected autonomous vehicles. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering\/ 36\/ (7): 838--857

    2021

  26. [34]

    Carvalho, M

    Costa, B., L. Carvalho, M. Rosa, A. Araujo, et al. 2022. Computational resource allocation in fog computing: A comprehensive survey. ACM Computing Surveys\/

    2022

  27. [35]

    Liu, and A

    Cui, J., Y. Liu, and A. Nallanathan. 2019. Multi-agent reinforcement learning-based resource allocation for uav networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications\/ 19\/ (2): 729--743

    2019

  28. [36]

    Du, X., T. Wang, Q. Feng, C. Ye, T. Tao, L. Wang, Y. Shi, and M. Chen. 2022. Multi-agent reinforcement learning for dynamic resource management in 6g in-x subnetworks. IEEE transactions on wireless communications\/ 22\/ (3): 1900--1914

    2022

  29. [37]

    Feriani, A. and E. Hossain. 2021. Single and multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for ai-enabled wireless networks: A tutorial. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials\/ 23\/ (2): 1226--1252

    2021

  30. [38]

    Gao, H., X. Wang, W. Wei, A. Al-Dulaimi, and Y. Xu. 2023. Com-ddpg: Task offloading based on multiagent reinforcement learning for information-communication-enhanced mobile edge computing in the internet of vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology\/

    2023

  31. [39]

    Liu, and A

    Gao, X., R. Liu, and A. Kaushik. 2020. Hierarchical multi-agent optimization for resource allocation in cloud computing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems\/ 32\/ (3): 692--707

    2020

  32. [40]

    Yang, and Y

    Gao, Z., L. Yang, and Y. Dai. 2022a. Fast adaptive task offloading and resource allocation via multiagent reinforcement learning in heterogeneous vehicular fog computing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal\/ 10\/ (8): 6818--6835

  33. [41]

    Yang, and Y

    Gao, Z., L. Yang, and Y. Dai. 2022b. Large-scale computation offloading using a multi-agent reinforcement learning in heterogeneous multi-access edge computing. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing\/ 22\/ (6): 3425--3443

  34. [42]

    Yang, and Y

    Gao, Z., L. Yang, and Y. Dai. 2023. Large-scale cooperative task offloading and resource allocation in heterogeneous mec systems via multi-agent reinforcement learning. IEEE Internet of Things Journal\/

    2023

  35. [43]

    Zhang, H.S.H

    Gong, Y.J., J. Zhang, H.S.H. Chung, W.N. Chen, Z.H. Zhan, Y. Li, and Y.H. Shi. 2012. An efficient resource allocation scheme using particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation\/ 16\/ (6): 801--816

    2012

  36. [44]

    Wagner, R

    Guindo, L.A., M. Wagner, R. Baltussen, D. Rindress, J. van Til, P. Kind, and M.M. Goetghebeur. 2012. From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\/ 10\/ (1): 9....

    2012 doi

  37. [45]

    Guo, D., L. Tang, X. Zhang, and Y.C. Liang. 2020. Joint optimization of handover control and power allocation based on multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology\/ 69\/ (11): 13124--13138

    2020

  38. [46]

    Guo, J., Y. Chen, Y. Hao, Z. Yin, Y. Yu, and S. Li 2022. Towards comprehensive testing on the robustness of cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp.\ 115--122

    2022

  39. [47]

    Halabian, H. 2019a. Distributed resource allocation optimization in 5g virtualized networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications\/ 37\/ (3): 627--642

  40. [48]

    Halabian, H. 2019b. Distributed resource allocation optimization in 5g virtualized networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications\/ 37\/ (3): 627--642. doi:10.1109/JSAC.2019.2894305

    2019

  41. [49]

    Hao, J., T. Yang, H. Tang, C. Bai, J. Liu, Z. Meng, P. Liu, and Z. Wang. 2023. Exploration in deep reinforcement learning: From single-agent to multiagent domain. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems\/

    2023

  42. [50]

    Bahrpeyma, and D

    Heik, D., F. Bahrpeyma, and D. Reichelt. 2024. Adaptive manufacturing: dynamic resource allocation using multi-agent reinforcement learning

    2024

  43. [51]

    Stephenson, and H

    Herrmann, A., M. Stephenson, and H. Schaub 2023. Reinforcement learning for multi-satellite agile earth observing scheduling under various communication assumptions. In AAS Rocky Mountain GN&C Conference

    2023

  44. [52]

    Stephenson, and H

    Herrmann, A., M.A. Stephenson, and H. Schaub. 2024. Single-agent reinforcement learning for scalable earth-observing satellite constellation operations. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets\/ 61\/ (1): 114--132

    2024

  45. [53]

    Jin, and Y

    Hong, Y., Y. Jin, and Y. Tang. 2022. Rethinking individual global max in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning. Advances in neural information processing systems\/ 35: 32438--32449

    2022

  46. [54]

    Hu, D., Z. Li, Z. Ye, Y. Peng, W. Xi, and T. Cai. 2024. Multi-agent graph reinforcement learning for decentralized volt-var control in power distribution systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems\/ 155: 109531

    2024

  47. [55]

    Hu, J. and M.P. Wellman. 2003. Nash q-learning for general-sum stochastic games. Journal of machine learning research\/ 4\/ (Nov): 1039--1069

    2003

  48. [56]

    Zhang, L

    Hu, J., H. Zhang, L. Song, R. Schober, and H.V. Poor. 2020. Cooperative internet of uavs: Distributed trajectory design by multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Communications\/ 68\/ (11): 6807--6821

    2020

  49. [57]

    Zhou, X.S

    Huang, B., M. Zhou, X.S. Lu, and A. Abusorrah. 2023. Scheduling of resource allocation systems with timed petri nets: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys\/ 55\/ (11): 1--27

    2023

  50. [58]

    Ibaraki, T. and N. Katoh. 1988. Resource allocation problems: algorithmic approaches . MIT press

    1988

  51. [59]

    Jain, V. and B. Kumar. 2023. Qos-aware task offloading in fog environment using multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. Journal of Network and Systems Management\/ 31\/ (1): 7

    2023

  52. [60]

    Halgamuge, and R

    Jayanetti, A., S. Halgamuge, and R. Buyya. 2024. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning framework for renewable energy-aware workflow scheduling on distributed cloud data centers. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems\/

    2024

  53. [61]

    Jendoubi, I. and F. Bouffard. 2023. Multi-agent hierarchical reinforcement learning for energy management. Applied Energy\/ 332: 120500

    2023

  54. [62]

    Ji, Y., Y. Wang, H. Zhao, G. Gui, H. Gacanin, H. Sari, and F. Adachi. 2023. Multi-agent reinforcement learning resources allocation method using dueling double deep q-network in vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology\/ 72\/ (10): 13447--13460

    2023

  55. [63]

    Qiming, S

    Jiandong, Z., Y. Qiming, S. Guoqing, L. Yi, and W. Yong. 2021. Uav cooperative air combat maneuver decision based on multi-agent reinforcement learning. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics\/ 32\/ (6): 1421--1438

    2021

  56. [64]

    Jiang, C. and Z. Sheng. 2009. Case-based reinforcement learning for dynamic inventory control in a multi-agent supply-chain system. Expert Systems with Applications\/ 36\/ (3): 6520--6526

    2009

  57. [65]

    Jiang, Y. 2015. A survey of task allocation and load balancing in distributed systems. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems\/ 27\/ (2): 585--599

    2015

  58. [66]

    Jing, X., X. Yao, M. Liu, and J. Zhou. 2024. Multi-agent reinforcement learning based on graph convolutional network for flexible job shop scheduling. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing\/ 35\/ (1): 75--93

    2024

  59. [67]

    Ju, Y., Y. Chen, Z. Cao, L. Liu, Q. Pei, M. Xiao, K. Ota, M. Dong, and V.C. Leung. 2023. Joint secure offloading and resource allocation for vehicular edge computing network: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Sy...

    2023

  60. [68]

    Chang, J

    Kang, H., X. Chang, J. Mi s i \'c , V.B. Mi s i \'c , J. Fan, and Y. Liu. 2023. Cooperative uav resource allocation and task offloading in hierarchical aerial computing systems: A mappo-based approach. IEEE Internet of Things Journal\/ 10\/ (12): 10497--10509

    2023

  61. [69]

    Kennedy, J. and R. Eberhart 1995. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN'95-international conference on neural networks , Volume 4, pp.\ 1942--1948. ieee

    1995

  62. [70]

    Abolhasan, W

    Khan, A.A., M. Abolhasan, W. Ni, J. Lipman, and A. Jamalipour. 2019. A hybrid-fuzzy logic guided genetic algorithm (h-flga) approach for resource optimization in 5g vanets. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology\/ 68\/ (7): 6964--6974

    2019

  63. [71]

    Khan, S.U. and I. Ahmad 2006. Non-cooperative, semi-cooperative, and cooperative games-based grid resource allocation. In Proceedings 20th IEEE International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium , pp.\ 10--pp. IEEE

    2006

  64. [72]

    Kim, Y. and H. Lim. 2021. Multi-agent reinforcement learning-based resource management for end-to-end network slicing. IEEE Access\/ 9: 56178--56190. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072435

    2021

  65. [73]

    Gelatt Jr, and M.P

    Kirkpatrick, S., C.D. Gelatt Jr, and M.P. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. science\/ 220\/ (4598): 671--680

    1983

  66. [74]

    Konda, V. and J. Tsitsiklis. 1999. Actor-critic algorithms. Advances in neural information processing systems\/ 12

    1999

  67. [75]

    Atmis, and H.H

    Kosanoglu, F., M. Atmis, and H.H. Turan. 2024. A deep reinforcement learning assisted simulated annealing algorithm for a maintenance planning problem. Annals of Operations Research\/ 339\/ (1): 79--110

    2024

  68. [76]

    Kakkar, S

    Kumari, A., R. Kakkar, S. Tanwar, D. Garg, Z. Polkowski, F. Alqahtani, and A. Tolba. 2024. Multi-agent-based decentralized residential energy management using deep reinforcement learning. Journal of Building Engineering\/ 87: 109031

    2024

  69. [77]

    Lei, L., Y. Tan, K. Zheng, S. Liu, K. Zhang, and X. Shen. 2020. Deep reinforcement learning for autonomous internet of things: Model, applications and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials\/ 22\/ (3): 1722--1760

    2020

  70. [78]

    Li, X., L. Lu, W. Ni, A. Jamalipour, D. Zhang, and H. Du. 2022. Federated multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for resource allocation of vehicle-to-vehicle communications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology\/ 71\/ (8): 8810--8824

    2022

  71. [79]

    Liao, X., X. Hu, Z. Liu, S. Ma, L. Xu, X. Li, W. Wang, and F.M. Ghannouchi. 2020. Distributed intelligence: A verification for multi-agent drl-based multibeam satellite resource allocation. IEEE Communications Letters\/ 24\/ (12): 2785--2789

    2020

  72. [80]

    Lin, J.T. and C.C. Chiu. 2018. A hybrid particle swarm optimization with local search for stochastic resource allocation problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing\/ 29\/ (3): 481--495

    2018

  73. [81]

    Liu, P., K. An, J. Lei, Y. Sun, W. Liu, and S. Chatzinotas. 2024. Computation rate maximization for scma-aided edge computing in iot networks: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications\/

    2024

  74. [82]

    Liu, W., B. Li, W. Xie, Y. Dai, and Z. Fei. 2023. Energy efficient computation offloading in aerial edge networks with multi-agent cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications\/ 22\/ (9): 5725--5739

    2023

  75. [83]

    Zhang, and J

    Liu, X.F., J. Zhang, and J. Wang. 2022. Cooperative particle swarm optimization with a bilevel resource allocation mechanism for large-scale dynamic optimization. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics\/ 53\/ (2): 1000--1011

    2022

  76. [84]

    Liu, Y., J. Fan, L. Zhao, W. Shen, and C. Zhang. 2023. Integration of deep reinforcement learning and multi-agent system for dynamic scheduling of re-entrant hybrid flow shop considering worker fatigue and skill levels. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing\/ 84: 102605

    2023

  77. [85]

    Lowe, R., Y. Wu, A. Tamar, J. Harb, O.P. Abbeel, and I. Mordatch 2017. Multi-agent actor-critic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp.\ 6379--6390

    2017

  78. [86]

    Zhang, T

    Lu, S., K. Zhang, T. Chen, T. Ba s ar, and L. Horesh 2021. Decentralized policy gradient descent ascent for safe multi-agent reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , Volume 35, pp.\ 8767--8775

    2021

  79. [87]

    Xiang, Y

    Lu, Y., Y. Xiang, Y. Huang, B. Yu, L. Weng, and J. Liu. 2023. Deep reinforcement learning based optimal scheduling of active distribution system considering distributed generation, energy storage and flexible load. Energy\/ 271: 127087

    2023

  80. [88]

    Ma, C., A. Li, Y. Du, H. Dong, and Y. Yang. 2024. Efficient and scalable reinforcement learning for large-scale network control. Nature Machine Intelligence\/ : 1--15

    2024

  81. [89]

    Alizadeh, I

    Mao, H., M. Alizadeh, I. Menache, and S. Kandula 2016. Resource management with deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM workshop on hot topics in networks , pp.\ 50--56

    2016

  82. [90]

    Meng, F., P. Chen, L. Wu, and J. Cheng. 2020. Power allocation in multi-user cellular networks: Deep reinforcement learning approaches. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications\/ 19\/ (10): 6255--6267

    2020

  83. [91]

    Badia, M

    Mnih, V., A.P. Badia, M. Mirza, A. Graves, T. Lillicrap, T. Harley, D. Silver, and K. Kavukcuoglu 2016. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning , pp.\ 1928--1937. PMLR

    2016

  84. [92]

    Sydir, M

    Naderializadeh, N., J.J. Sydir, M. Simsek, and H. Nikopour. 2021. Resource management in wireless networks via multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications\/ 20\/ (6): 3507--3523

    2021

  85. [93]

    Nasir, Y.S. and D. Guo. 2019. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for dynamic power allocation in wireless networks. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications\/ 37\/ (10): 2239--2250

    2019

  86. [94]

    Nguyen, and S

    Nguyen, T.T., N.D. Nguyen, and S. Nahavandi. 2020. Deep reinforcement learning for multiagent systems: A review of challenges, solutions, and applications. IEEE transactions on cybernetics\/ 50\/ (9): 3826--3839

    2020

  87. [95]

    Ning, Z. and L. Xie. 2024. A survey on multi-agent reinforcement learning and its application. Journal of Automation and Intelligence\/

    2024

  88. [96]

    Noor-A-Rahim, M., Z. Liu, H. Lee, G.M.N. Ali, D. Pesch, and P. Xiao. 2020. A survey on resource allocation in vehicular networks. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems\/ 23\/ (2): 701--721

    2020

  89. [97]

    Amato, et al

    Oliehoek, F.A., C. Amato, et al. 2016. A concise introduction to decentralized POMDPs , Volume 1. Springer

    2016

  90. [98]

    Orr, J. and A. Dutta. 2023. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for multi-robot applications: A survey. Sensors\/ 23\/ (7): 3625

    2023

  91. [99]

    Javan, N

    Parvini, M., M.R. Javan, N. Mokari, B. Abbasi, and E.A. Jorswieck. 2023. Aoi-aware resource allocation for platoon-based c-v2x networks via multi-agent multi-task reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology\/ 72\/ (8): 9880--9896

    2023

  92. [100]

    Patriksson, M. 2008. A survey on the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem. European Journal of Operational Research\/ 185\/ (1): 1--46

    2008

  93. [101]

    Dettmer, T

    Pendyala, A., J. Dettmer, T. Glasmachers, and A. Atamna 2024. Containergym: A real-world reinforcement learning benchmark for resource allocation. In G. Nicosia, V. Ojha, E. La Malfa, G. La Malfa, P. M. Pardalos, and R. Umeton (Eds.), Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data S...

    2024

  94. [102]

    Samvelyan, C.S

    Rashid, T., M. Samvelyan, C.S. De Witt, G. Farquhar, J. Foerster, and S. Whiteson. 2020. Monotonic value function factorisation for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research\/ 21\/ (178): 1--51

    2020

  95. [103]

    Ren, L., X. Fan, J. Cui, Z. Shen, Y. Lv, and G. Xiong. 2022. A multi-agent reinforcement learning method with route recorders for vehicle routing in supply chain management. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems\/ 23\/ (9): 16410--16420

    2022

  96. [104]

    Linder, R

    Roesch, M., C. Linder, R. Zimmermann, A. Rudolf, A. Hohmann, and G. Reinhart. 2020. Smart grid for industry using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Applied Sciences\/ 10\/ (19): 6900

    2020

  97. [105]

    Vargas, and K

    Saaty, T.L., L.G. Vargas, and K. Dellmann. 2003. The allocation of intangible resources: the analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences\/ 37\/ (3): 169--184

    2003

  98. [106]

    Sadatdiynov, K., L. Cui, L. Zhang, J.Z. Huang, S. Salloum, and M.S. Mahmud. 2023. A review of optimization methods for computation offloading in edge computing networks. Digital Communications and Networks\/ 9\/ (2): 450--461

    2023

  99. [107]

    Nencioni, and M.M.I

    Sarah, A., G. Nencioni, and M.M.I. Khan. 2023. Resource allocation in multi-access edge computing for 5g-and-beyond networks. Computer Networks\/ 227: 109720

    2023

  100. [108]

    Schulman, J. 2015. Trust region policy optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.05477\/

    2015 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Wolski, P

    Schulman, J., F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. Klimov. 2017. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347\/

    2017 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Boateng, B

    Seid, A.M., G.O. Boateng, B. Mareri, G. Sun, and W. Jiang. 2021. Multi-agent drl for task offloading and resource allocation in multi-uav enabled iot edge network. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management\/ 18\/ (4): 4531--4547

    2021

  103. [111]

    Kshitij, and C.S

    Shao, X., F.S. Kshitij, and C.S. Kim. 2024. Gails: an effective multi-object job shop scheduler based on genetic algorithm and iterative local search. Scientific Reports\/ 14\/ (1): 2068

    2024

  104. [112]

    Zhong, X

    Shen, R., S. Zhong, X. Wen, Q. An, R. Zheng, Y. Li, and J. Zhao. 2022. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning optimization framework for building energy system with renewable energy. Applied Energy\/ 312: 118724

    2022

  105. [113]

    Dziurzanski, H.R

    Singh, A.K., P. Dziurzanski, H.R. Mendis, and L.S. Indrusiak. 2017, April. A survey and comparative study of hard and soft real-time dynamic resource allocation strategies for multi-/many-core systems. ACM Comput. Surv.\/ 50\/ (2). doi:10.1145/3057267

    2017 doi

  106. [114]

    Papadopoulos, and J.M

    Spinellis, D., C. Papadopoulos, and J.M. Smith. 2000. Large production line optimization using simulated annealing. International journal of production research\/ 38\/ (3): 509--541

    2000

  107. [115]

    Stephenson, M. and H. Schaub 2024a. Reinforcement learning for earth-observing satellite autonomy with event-based task intervals. In AAS Rocky Mountain GN&C Conference, Breckenridge, CO

  108. [116]

    Stephenson, M.A. and H. Schaub 2024b. Bsk-rl: Modular, high-fidelity reinforcement learning environments for spacecraft tasking. In 75th International Astronautical Congress, Milan, Italy, IAF

  109. [117]

    Suman, B. and P. Kumar. 2006. A survey of simulated annealing as a tool for single and multiobjective optimization. Journal of the operational research society\/ 57\/ (10): 1143--1160

    2006

  110. [118]

    Sun, X. and J. Qiu. 2021. Two-stage volt/var control in active distribution networks with multi-agent deep reinforcement learning method. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid\/ 12\/ (4): 2903--2912

    2021

  111. [119]

    Lever, A

    Sunehag, P., G. Lever, A. Gruslys, W.M. Czarnecki, V. Zambaldi, M. Jaderberg, M. Lanctot, N. Sonnerat, J.Z. Leibo, K. Tuyls, and T. Graepel 2018. Value-decomposition networks for cooperative multi-agent learning based on team reward. In Proceedings of the 17th International Co...

    2018

  112. [120]

    Sutton, R.S. 1988. Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences. Machine learning\/ 3: 9--44

    1988

  113. [121]

    Sutton, R.S. and A.G. Barto. 2018. Reinforcement learning: An introduction . MIT press

    2018

  114. [122]

    Kawahara, and S

    Suzuki, A., R. Kawahara, and S. Harada. 2022. Cooperative multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for dynamic virtual network allocation with traffic fluctuations. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management\/ 19\/ (3): 1982--2000

    2022

  115. [123]

    Tang, J., D.K. So, E. Alsusa, K.A. Hamdi, and A. Shojaeifard. 2015. Resource allocation for energy efficiency optimization in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications\/ 33\/ (10): 2104--2117

    2015

  116. [124]

    Wang, L.D

    Tseng, F.H., X. Wang, L.D. Chou, H.C. Chao, and V.C. Leung. 2017. Dynamic resource prediction and allocation for cloud data center using the multiobjective genetic algorithm. IEEE Systems Journal\/ 12\/ (2): 1688--1699

    2017

  117. [125]

    Ushakov, I.A. 2013. Optimal resource allocation: with practical statistical applications and theory . John Wiley & Sons

    2013

  118. [126]

    Guez, and D

    Van Hasselt, H., A. Guez, and D. Silver 2016. Deep reinforcement learning with double q-learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , Volume 30

    2016

  119. [127]

    Vengerov, D. 2007. A reinforcement learning approach to dynamic resource allocation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\/ 20\/ (3): 383--390

    2007

  120. [128]

    Wang, J., W. Xu, Y. Gu, W. Song, and T.C. Green 2021. Multi-agent reinforcement learning for active voltage control on power distribution networks. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P. Liang, and J. W. Vaughan (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems ...

    2021

  121. [129]

    Li, and A

    Wang, Q., W. Li, and A. Mohajer. 2024. Load-aware continuous-time optimization for multi-agent systems: Toward dynamic resource allocation and real-time adaptability. Computer Networks\/ 250: 110526

    2024

  122. [130]

    Wang, X., L. Ke, Z. Qiao, and X. Chai. 2020. Large-scale traffic signal control using a novel multiagent reinforcement learning. IEEE transactions on cybernetics\/ 51\/ (1): 174--187

    2020

  123. [131]

    Wang, Y., T. Xu, X. Niu, C. Tan, E. Chen, and H. Xiong. 2020. Stmarl: A spatio-temporal multi-agent reinforcement learning approach for cooperative traffic light control. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing\/ 21\/ (6): 2228--2242

    2020

  124. [132]

    Schaul, M

    Wang, Z., T. Schaul, M. Hessel, H. Hasselt, M. Lanctot, and N. Freitas 2016. Dueling network architectures for deep reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning , pp.\ 1995--2003. PMLR

    2016

  125. [133]

    Wei, H., C. Chen, G. Zheng, K. Wu, V. Gayah, K. Xu, and Z. Li 2019. Presslight: Learning max pressure control to coordinate traffic signals in arterial network. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining , KDD '19, New Y...

    2019

  126. [134]

    Wei, W., R. Yang, H. Gu, W. Zhao, C. Chen, and S. Wan. 2021. Multi-objective optimization for resource allocation in vehicular cloud computing networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems\/ 23\/ (12): 25536--25545

    2021

  127. [135]

    Wei, Z., B. Li, R. Zhang, X. Cheng, and L. Yang. 2023. Many-to-many task offloading in vehicular fog computing: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing\/ 23\/ (3): 2107--2122

    2023

  128. [136]

    Wen, G., J. Fu, P. Dai, and J. Zhou. 2021. Dtde: A new cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning framework. The Innovation\/ 2\/ (4)

    2021

  129. [137]

    B \"a ck, A.V

    Wong, A., T. B \"a ck, A.V. Kononova, and A. Plaat. 2023. Deep multiagent reinforcement learning: Challenges and directions. Artificial Intelligence Review\/ 56\/ (6): 5023--5056

    2023

  130. [138]

    Wu, G., Z. Xu, H. Zhang, S. Shen, and S. Yu. 2023. Multi-agent drl for joint completion delay and energy consumption with queuing theory in mec-based iiot. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing\/ 176: 80--94

    2023

  131. [139]

    Pang, K.L

    Wu, H., G.K.H. Pang, K.L. Choy, and H.Y. Lam. 2018. Dynamic resource allocation for parking lot electric vehicle recharging using heuristic fuzzy particle swarm optimization algorithm. Applied Soft Computing\/ 71: 538--552

    2018

  132. [140]

    Wu, T., P. Zhou, K. Liu, Y. Yuan, X. Wang, H. Huang, and D.O. Wu. 2020. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for urban traffic light control in vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology\/ 69\/ (8): 8243--8256

    2020

  133. [141]

    Song, and J

    Xiao, Y., Y. Song, and J. Liu. 2023. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning based resource allocation for ultra-reliable low-latency internet of controllable things. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications\/ 22\/ (8): 5414--5430

    2023

  134. [142]

    Xu, J., M. Zhao, J. Fortes, R. Carpenter, and M. Yousif. 2008. Autonomic resource management in virtualized data centers using fuzzy logic-based approaches. Cluster Computing\/ 11: 213--227

    2008

  135. [143]

    Xu, X., Y. Jia, Y. Xu, Z. Xu, S. Chai, and C.S. Lai. 2020. A multi-agent reinforcement learning-based data-driven method for home energy management. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid\/ 11\/ (4): 3201--3211

    2020

  136. [144]

    Xu, X., K. Xu, Z. Zeng, J. Tang, Y. He, G. Shi, and T. Zhang. 2024. Collaborative optimization of multi-energy multi-microgrid system: A hierarchical trust-region multi-agent reinforcement learning approach. Applied Energy\/ 375: 123923

    2024

  137. [145]

    Xue, K., J. Xu, L. Yuan, M. Li, C. Qian, Z. Zhang, and Y. Yu. 2022. Multi-agent dynamic algorithm configuration. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems\/ 35: 20147--20161

    2022

  138. [146]

    Yang, Y., R. Luo, M. Li, M. Zhou, W. Zhang, and J. Wang 2018. Mean field multi-agent reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning , pp.\ 5571--5580. PMLR

    2018

  139. [147]

    Ye, D. and J. Chen. 2013. Non-cooperative games on multidimensional resource allocation. Future Generation Computer Systems\/ 29\/ (6): 1345--1352

    2013

  140. [148]

    Yin, S. and F.R. Yu. 2021. Resource allocation and trajectory design in uav-aided cellular networks based on multiagent reinforcement learning. IEEE Internet of Things Journal\/ 9\/ (4): 2933--2943

    2021

  141. [149]

    You, X., X. Li, Y. Xu, H. Feng, J. Zhao, and H. Yan. 2020. Toward packet routing with fully distributed multiagent deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems\/ 52\/ (2): 855--868

    2020

  142. [150]

    Yu, C., A. Velu, E. Vinitsky, J. Gao, Y. Wang, A. Bayen, and Y. Wu. 2022. The surprising effectiveness of ppo in cooperative multi-agent games. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems\/ 35: 24611--24624

    2022

  143. [151]

    Yu, L., S. Qin, M. Zhang, C. Shen, T. Jiang, and X. Guan. 2021. A review of deep reinforcement learning for smart building energy management. IEEE Internet of Things Journal\/ 8\/ (15): 12046--12063

    2021

  144. [152]

    Yun, W.J., J.P. Kim, S. Jung, J.H. Kim, and J. Kim. 2023. Quantum multiagent actor--critic neural networks for internet-connected multirobot coordination in smart factory management. IEEE Internet of Things Journal\/ 10\/ (11): 9942--9952

    2023

  145. [153]

    Mahmud, R

    Yánez, W., R. Mahmud, R. Bahsoon, Y. Zhang, and R. Buyya. 2020. Data allocation mechanism for internet-of-things systems with blockchain. IEEE Internet of Things Journal\/ 7\/ (4): 3509--3522. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2020.2972776

    2020

  146. [154]

    Eftekhari Moghadam, and M.H

    Zabihi, Z., A.M. Eftekhari Moghadam, and M.H. Rezvani. 2023, August. Reinforcement learning methods for computation offloading: A systematic review. ACM Comput. Surv.\/ 56\/ (1). doi:10.1145/3603703

    2023 doi

  147. [155]

    Javadpour, S

    Zeynivand, A., A. Javadpour, S. Bolouki, A.K. Sangaiah, F. Ja’fari, P. Pinto, and W. Zhang. 2022. Traffic flow control using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Journal of Network and Computer Applications\/ 207: 103497

    2022

  148. [156]

    Zhang, B., W. Hu, A.M. Ghias, X. Xu, and Z. Chen. 2023. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning based distributed control architecture for interconnected multi-energy microgrid energy management and optimization. Energy Conversion and Management\/ 277: 116647

    2023

  149. [157]

    Yang, and H.H

    Zhang, G., K. Yang, and H.H. Chen. 2012. Resource allocation for wireless cooperative networks: A unified cooperative bargaining game theoretic framework. IEEE Wireless Communications\/ 19\/ (2): 38--43

    2012

  150. [158]

    Zhang, H., S. Feng, C. Liu, Y. Ding, Y. Zhu, Z. Zhou, W. Zhang, Y. Yu, H. Jin, and Z. Li 2019. Cityflow: A multi-agent reinforcement learning environment for large scale city traffic scenario. In The World Wide Web Conference , WWW '19, New York, NY, USA, pp.\ 3620–3624. Assoc...

    2019

  151. [159]

    Jiang, N.C

    Zhang, H., C. Jiang, N.C. Beaulieu, X. Chu, X. Wang, and T.Q. Quek. 2015. Resource allocation for cognitive small cell networks: A cooperative bargaining game theoretic approach. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications\/ 14\/ (6): 3481--3493

    2015

  152. [160]

    Zhang, H., H. Zhao, R. Liu, A. Kaushik, X. Gao, and S. Xu. 2024. Collaborative task offloading optimization for satellite mobile edge computing using multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology\/

    2024

  153. [161]

    Zhang, J.D., Z. He, W.H. Chan, and C.Y. Chow. 2023. Deepmag: Deep reinforcement learning with multi-agent graphs for flexible job shop scheduling. Knowledge-Based Systems\/ 259: 110083

    2023

  154. [162]

    Cao, and Y

    Zhang, K., J. Cao, and Y. Zhang. 2021. Adaptive digital twin and multiagent deep reinforcement learning for vehicular edge computing and networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics\/ 18\/ (2): 1405--1413

    2021

  155. [163]

    Dou, P.H.J

    Zhang, M., Y. Dou, P.H.J. Chong, H.C. Chan, and B.C. Seet. 2021. Fuzzy logic-based resource allocation algorithm for v2x communications in 5g cellular networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications\/ 39\/ (8): 2501--2513

    2021

  156. [164]

    Zhang, and J

    Zhang, S.Q., Q. Zhang, and J. Lin. 2019. Efficient communication in multi-agent reinforcement learning via variance based control. Advances in neural information processing systems\/ 32

    2019

  157. [165]

    Zhang, W., D. Yang, W. Wu, H. Peng, N. Zhang, H. Zhang, and X. Shen. 2021. Optimizing federated learning in distributed industrial iot: A multi-agent approach. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications\/ 39\/ (12): 3688--3703

    2021

  158. [166]

    Zhang, X. and S. Debroy. 2023. Resource management in mobile edge computing: a comprehensive survey. ACM Computing Surveys\/ 55\/ (13s): 1--37

    2023

  159. [167]

    Zhang, Y., Z. Mou, F. Gao, J. Jiang, R. Ding, and Z. Han. 2020. Uav-enabled secure communications by multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology\/ 69\/ (10): 11599--11611

    2020

  160. [168]

    Zheng, Z

    Zhang, Y., G. Zheng, Z. Liu, Q. Li, and H. Zeng. 2024. Marlens: understanding multi-agent reinforcement learning for traffic signal control via visual analytics. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics\/

    2024

  161. [169]

    Zhang, Y., H. Zhu, D. Tang, T. Zhou, and Y. Gui. 2022. Dynamic job shop scheduling based on deep reinforcement learning for multi-agent manufacturing systems. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing\/ 78: 102412

    2022

  162. [170]

    Zhao, J., F. Hu, J. Li, and Y. Nie. 2023. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning based resource management in heterogeneous v2x networks. Digital Communications and Networks\/

    2023

  163. [171]

    Zhao, N., Z. Ye, Y. Pei, Y.C. Liang, and D. Niyato. 2022. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for task offloading in uav-assisted mobile edge computing. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications\/ 21\/ (9): 6949--6960

    2022

  164. [172]

    Zheng, P., L. Xia, C. Li, X. Li, and B. Liu. 2021. Towards self-x cognitive manufacturing network: An industrial knowledge graph-based multi-agent reinforcement learning approach. Journal of Manufacturing Systems\/ 61: 16--26

    2021

  165. [173]

    Zhong, Y., J.G. Kuba, X. Feng, S. Hu, J. Ji, and Y. Yang. 2024. Heterogeneous-agent reinforcement learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research\/ 25: 1--67

    2024

  166. [174]

    Jiang, S

    Zhou, H., K. Jiang, S. He, G. Min, and J. Wu. 2023. Distributed deep multi-agent reinforcement learning for cooperative edge caching in internet-of-vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications\/ 22\/ (12): 9595--9609

    2023

  167. [175]

    Dastani, and S

    Zhu, C., M. Dastani, and S. Wang 2024. A survey of multi-agent deep reinforcement learning with communication. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems , AAMAS '24, Richland, SC, pp.\ 2845–2847. International Foundation fo...

    2024

  168. [176]

    Zhu, X., Y. Luo, A. Liu, M.Z.A. Bhuiyan, and S. Zhang. 2020. Multiagent deep reinforcement learning for vehicular computation offloading in iot. IEEE Internet of Things Journal\/ 8\/ (12): 9763--9773

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.