pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.00865 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-01 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Hardware-Efficient Universal Linear Transformations for Optical Modes in the Synthetic Time Dimension

Jasvith Raj Basani , Chaohan Cui , Jack Postlewaite , Edo Waks , Saikat Guha This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 16:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords synthetic time dimensionphotonic processorlinear transformationsoptical modesBell state measurementscluster-state quantum computationhardware efficiencymulti-photon transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

A synthetic time-domain photonic processor implements arbitrary linear transformations on optical modes using exponentially fewer hardware components than spatial interferometers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard spatial photonic circuits for universal linear transformations require a number of components that grows quadratically with the number of modes, creating a scaling barrier. The paper introduces a processor that operates in a synthetic time dimension with dynamic connectivity, enabling systematic pruning that cuts the component count by at least an exponential factor while keeping all-to-all connectivity and reducing loss. When applied to boosted Bell state measurements, the architecture exceeds the thresholds needed for universal cluster-state quantum computation under realistic imperfections. The authors tie this performance to geometric features of multi-photon transport, where localization from redundant hardware adds robustness against coherent errors. A reader would care because the approach removes a major hardware obstacle to building practical, reconfigurable photonic quantum processors.

Core claim

The central claim is that a hardware-efficient synthetic time-domain photonic processor achieves at least an exponential reduction in hardware component count for implementing arbitrary linear transformations on optical modes, with dynamic connectivity that permits pruning to minimize loss while preserving universality, and that this design exceeds universal cluster-state thresholds on boosted Bell state measurements under realistic hardware constraints due to localization effects in multi-photon transport.

What carries the argument

Synthetic time dimension with dynamic connectivity and systematic pruning of redundant elements to minimize optical loss while retaining all-to-all connectivity.

If this is right

  • Boosted Bell state measurements in this architecture exceed thresholds for universal cluster-state quantum computation even with realistic imperfections.
  • Systematic pruning reduces optical loss without sacrificing all-to-all connectivity for arbitrary linear transformations.
  • Localization from redundant hardware enhances robustness to coherent errors via multi-photon transport geometry.
  • The design provides a practical route to scalable reconfigurable photonic processors without quadratic component growth.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The time-domain approach could be extended to other linear optical tasks such as quantum simulation or sensing by reusing the same pruned connectivity.
  • Deliberate engineering of the multi-photon localization geometry might be used to suppress specific error channels beyond what the paper models.
  • Integration with existing time-bin encoding techniques in fiber or integrated photonics could accelerate experimental tests of the exponential scaling claim.

Load-bearing premise

The model of multi-photon transport and localization effects from redundant imperfect hardware accurately reflects real-device behavior without introducing unmodeled errors that would block exceeding cluster-state thresholds.

What would settle it

An experimental implementation of the boosted Bell state measurement protocol in the synthetic time processor that fails to reach the success probability or fidelity required for universal cluster-state quantum computation under the stated hardware constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.00865 by Chaohan Cui, Edo Waks, Jack Postlewaite, Jasvith Raj Basani, Saikat Guha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic and operation of the generalized Green Machine. (a) Illustration of the hardware components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Performances of the generalized Green Machine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Green Machine implementation of boosted Bell [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Successful heralding rate and error rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Photon transport through the generalized Green Machine. (a) Single photon transport through the 8-mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Stepwise operations to couple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Connectivity as a function of number of stages. (a)-(e) Schematics of the connectivity among eight time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Scaling of state infidelity as a function of MZI error. Numerical simulations and analytically derived scaling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Multiplexed architecture and computational [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Scaling of the matrix errors for the Clements ar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent progress in photonic information processing has spurred strong demand in scalable and reconfigurable photonic circuitry. Conventional spatially-meshed multi-port interferometers require a number of components growing quadratically with the system size, posing a fundamental scaling challenge ahead. Here, we introduce a hardware-efficient synthetic time-domain photonic processor that achieves at least an exponential reduction in hardware component count for implementing arbitrary linear transformations. The processor's dynamic connectivity allows systematic pruning, minimizing optical loss while preserving all-to-all connectivity. We benchmark our architecture on the task of boosted Bell state measurements -- a protocol essential for linear optical quantum computation, and show that it exceeds thresholds for universal cluster-state quantum computation under realistic hardware constraints. We link the device performance to the geometry of multi-photon transport, showing that localization effects from redundant, imperfect hardware may enhance robustness to coherent errors. Our design establishes a practical pathway toward near-term, scalable, and reconfigurable photonic processors in the synthetic time dimension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a synthetic time-domain photonic processor that implements arbitrary linear transformations on optical modes using dynamic connectivity and systematic pruning of redundant elements. This yields at least an exponential reduction in hardware component count relative to spatially meshed interferometers. The architecture is benchmarked on boosted Bell-state measurements, with the claim that it exceeds the thresholds required for universal cluster-state quantum computation under realistic hardware constraints. Performance is attributed to localization effects in the multi-photon transport geometry induced by imperfect redundant hardware.

Significance. If the benchmarking claims are substantiated with explicit models and data, the work would offer a concrete route to scalable reconfigurable photonic processors by replacing quadratic spatial scaling with time-multiplexed dynamic connectivity. The geometric link between redundancy-induced localization and enhanced robustness to coherent errors could inform error-mitigation strategies in linear-optical quantum computing.

major comments (1)
  1. [Benchmarking section (results on boosted Bell-state measurements)] The central claim that the boosted Bell-state measurement benchmark exceeds universal cluster-state thresholds under realistic constraints rests on the multi-photon transport and localization model. The manuscript does not supply the explicit error model (including timing jitter, group-velocity dispersion, or pulse-to-pulse overlap), simulation parameters, or quantitative fidelity data that would allow verification that the predicted gain survives these effects. This is load-bearing because the threshold-exceeding result is the primary concrete evidence offered for practical utility.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a precise statement of the scaling exponent (e.g., O(N) vs. O(log N) components) together with the precise definition of system size N.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive criticism of our manuscript. We address the major comment point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Benchmarking section (results on boosted Bell-state measurements)] The central claim that the boosted Bell-state measurement benchmark exceeds universal cluster-state thresholds under realistic constraints rests on the multi-photon transport and localization model. The manuscript does not supply the explicit error model (including timing jitter, group-velocity dispersion, or pulse-to-pulse overlap), simulation parameters, or quantitative fidelity data that would allow verification that the predicted gain survives these effects. This is load-bearing because the threshold-exceeding result is the primary concrete evidence offered for practical utility.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for more explicit details in the benchmarking section. The manuscript links the performance to localization effects in the multi-photon transport geometry due to redundant hardware, which enhances robustness to coherent errors. However, we acknowledge that the specific error models for timing jitter, group-velocity dispersion, and pulse-to-pulse overlap, as well as the simulation parameters and quantitative fidelity data, require further elaboration to allow full verification. In the revised manuscript, we will expand this section to provide the explicit error model, list the simulation parameters used, and include quantitative fidelity results demonstrating that the gain over thresholds persists under these realistic effects. This will be done in the main text where possible, with additional details in the supplementary information. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity; claims rely on external hardware models and geometric interpretations without self-referential reductions

full rationale

The abstract and provided context present the architecture's exponential hardware reduction and Bell-state benchmark performance as following from dynamic connectivity, systematic pruning, and multi-photon localization geometry under realistic constraints. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that define a result in terms of itself or rename a fitted quantity as a prediction. Benchmarking is described as resting on external hardware models rather than internal fits, and the localization-robustness link is presented as an interpretive connection rather than a definitional equivalence. This yields a minor self-citation tolerance score with the central claims retaining independent content from the described geometry and benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Limited information available from abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The benchmarking implicitly assumes standard models of photonic loss and multi-photon interference.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Realistic hardware constraints and multi-photon transport geometry allow the architecture to exceed thresholds for universal cluster-state quantum computation.
    The performance claim rests on this modeling assumption about device imperfections and photon localization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5703 in / 1173 out tokens · 91284 ms · 2026-05-22T16:40:12.846354+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Y. Shen, N. C. Harris, S. Skirlo, M. Prabhu, T. Baehr-Jones, M. Hochberg, X. Sun, S. Zhao, H. Larochelle, D. Englund,et al., Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits, Nature Pho- tonics11, 441 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Bandyopadhyay, A

    S. Bandyopadhyay, A. Sludds, S. Krastanov, R. Hamerly, N. Harris, D. Bunandar, M. Streshin- sky, M. Hochberg, and D. Englund, Single-chip pho- tonic deep neural network with forward-only train- ing, Nature Photonics18, 1335 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    S. R. Ahmed, R. Baghdadi, M. Bernadskiy, N. Bow- man, R. Braid, J. Carr, C. Chen, P. Ciccarella, M. Cole, J. Cooke,et al., Universal photonic ar- tificial intelligence acceleration, Nature640, 368 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    S. Hua, E. Divita, S. Yu, B. Peng, C. Roques- Carmes, Z. Su, Z. Chen, Y. Bai, J. Zou, Y. Zhu, et al., An integrated large-scale photonic accelera- tor with ultralow latency, Nature640, 361 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Luo, H.-S

    Y.-H. Luo, H.-S. Zhong, M. Erhard, X.-L. Wang, L.- C. Peng, M. Krenn, X. Jiang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu,et al., Quantum teleportation in high dimen- sions, Physical Review Letters123, 070505 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Chen, C. Cui, J. P. Dowling, Z. Ou, and T. Byrnes, Quantum teleportation of photonic qudits using linear optics, Physical Review A100, 032330 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    C. Cui, K. P. Seshadreesan, S. Guha, and L. Fan, High-dimensional frequency-encoded quantum in- formation processing with passive photonics and time-resolving detection, Physical Review Letters 124, 190502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Y. Chi, J. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Mao, Z. Zhou, X. Chen, C. Zhai, J. Bao, T. Dai, H. Yuan,et al., A programmable qudit-based quantum processor, Na- ture Communications13, 1166 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    J. R. Basani, M. Y. Niu, and E. Waks, Universal logical quantum photonic neural network processor via cavity-assisted interactions, npj Quantum Infor- mation11, 142 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Carolan, C

    J. Carolan, C. Harrold, C. Sparrow, E. Martín- López, N. J. Russell, J. W. Silverstone, P. J. Shad- bolt, N. Matsuda, M. Oguma, M. Itoh,et al., Uni- versal linear optics, Science349, 711 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Romero, J

    J. Romero, J. P. Olson, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Quantum autoencoders for efficient compression of quantum data, Quantum Science and Technology2, 045001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Fischer, M

    B. Fischer, M. Chemnitz, B. MacLellan, P. Roz- tocki, R. Helsten, B. Wetzel, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, J. Azaña,et al., Autonomous on-chip interferometry for reconfigurable optical waveform generation, Optica8, 1268 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    S. Ou, K. Xue, L. Zhou, C.-h. Lee, A. Sludds, R. Hamerly, K. Zhang, H. Feng, Y. Yu, R. Kopparapu,et al., Hypermultiplexed integrated photonics–based optical tensor processor, Science Advances11, eadu0228 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Sparrow, E

    C. Sparrow, E. Martín-López, N. Maraviglia, A. Neville, C. Harrold, J. Carolan, Y. N. Joglekar, T. Hashimoto, N. Matsuda, J. L. O’Brien,et al., Simulating the vibrational quantum dynamics of molecules using photonics, Nature557, 660 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Qiang, X

    X. Qiang, X. Zhou, J. Wang, C. M. Wilkes, T. Loke, S. O’Gara, L. Kling, G. D. Marshall, R. Santagati, T. C. Ralph,et al., Large-scale silicon quantum pho- tonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing, Nature Photonics12, 534 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    J. Bao, Z. Fu, T. Pramanik, J. Mao, Y. Chi, Y. Cao, C. Zhai, Y. Mao, T. Dai, X. Chen,et al., Very-large- scale integrated quantum graph photonics, Nature Photonics , 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    L. S. Madsen, F. Laudenbach, M. F. Askarani, F. Rortais, T. Vincent, J. F. Bulmer, F. M. Miatto, L. Neuhaus, L. G. Helt, M. J. Collins,et al., Quan- tum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor, Nature606, 75 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Zhong, H

    H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu,et al., Quantum computational advantage using photons, Science370, 1460 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Y. Xia, W. Li, Q. Zhuang, and Z. Zhang, Quantum- enhanced data classification with a variational en- tangled sensor network, Physical Review X11, 021047 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Z.-H. Liu, R. Brunel, E. E. Østergaard, O. Cordero, S. Chen, Y. Wong, J. A. Nielsen, A. B. Bregnsbo, S. Zhou, H.-Y. Huang,et al., Quantum learning advantage on a scalable photonic platform, Science 389, 1332 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Guha, Structured optical receivers to attain su- peradditive capacity and the holevo limit, Physical Review Letters106, 240502 (2011)

    S. Guha, Structured optical receivers to attain su- peradditive capacity and the holevo limit, Physical Review Letters106, 240502 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    C. Cui, J. Postlewaite, B. N. Saif, L. Fan, and S. Guha, Superadditive communication with the green machine as a practical demonstration of non- locality without entanglement, Nature Communica- tions16, 3760 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Rosati and A

    M. Rosati and A. Solana, Joint-detection learning for optical communication at the quantum limit, Optica Quantum2, 390 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Rosati and G

    M. Rosati and G. Cincotti, A fourier machine for quantum optical communications, Journal of Light- wave Technology43, 3770 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator, Physical Review Letters73, 58 (1994)

    work page 1994

  26. [26]

    W. R. Clements, P. C. Humphreys, B. J. Metcalf, W. S. Kolthammer, and I. A. Walmsley, Optimal de- sign for universal multiport interferometers, Optica 3, 1460 (2016). 16

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Carolan, M

    J. Carolan, M. Mohseni, J. P. Olson, M. Prabhu, C. Chen, D. Bunandar, M. Y. Niu, N. C. Harris, F. N. Wong, M. Hochberg,et al., Variational quan- tum unsampling on a quantum photonic processor, Nature Physics16, 322 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Bandyopadhyay, R

    S. Bandyopadhyay, R. Hamerly, and D. Englund, Hardware error correction for programmable pho- tonics, Optica8, 1247 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Hamerly, S

    R. Hamerly, S. Bandyopadhyay, and D. Englund, Accurate self-configuration of rectangular multi- port interferometers, Physical Review Applied18, 024019 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Hamerly, S

    R. Hamerly, S. Bandyopadhyay, and D. Englund, Stability of self-configuring large multiport inter- ferometers, Physical Review Applied18, 024018 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Hamerly, S

    R. Hamerly, S. Bandyopadhyay, and D. Englund, Asymptotically fault-tolerant programmable pho- tonics, Nature Communications13, 6831 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Burgwal, W

    R. Burgwal, W. R. Clements, D. H. Smith, J. C. Gates, W. S. Kolthammer, J. J. Renema, and I. A. Walmsley, Using an imperfect photonic network to implement random unitaries, Optics Express25, 28236 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    S. P. Kumar, L. Neuhaus, L. G. Helt, H. Qi, B. Mor- rison, D. H. Mahler, and I. Dhand, Mitigating linear optics imperfections via port allocation and compi- lation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03183 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Ewaniuk, J

    J. Ewaniuk, J. Carolan, B. J. Shastri, and N. Roten- berg, Imperfect quantum photonic neural networks, AdvancedQuantumTechnologies6,2200125(2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Hamerly, S

    R. Hamerly, S. Bandyopadhyay, A. Sludds, Z. Chen, L. Bernstein, S. K. Vadlamani, J. Basani, R. Davis, and D. Englund, Multiplexing methods for scaling up photonic logic, inAI and Optical Data Sciences IV, Vol. 12438 (SPIE, 2023) p. 1243802

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    J.R.Basani, M.Heuck, D.R.Englund,andS.Kras- tanov, All-photonic artificial-neural-network proces- sor via nonlinear optics, Physical Review Applied 22, 014009 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Hamerly, L

    R. Hamerly, L. Bernstein, A. Sludds, M. Soljačić, and D. Englund, Large-scale optical neural networks based on photoelectric multiplication, Physical Re- view X9, 021032 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    K. R. Motes, A. Gilchrist, J. P. Dowling, and P. P. Rohde, Scalable boson sampling with time-bin en- coding using a loop-based architecture, Physical Re- view Letters113, 120501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Y. He, X. Ding, Z.-E. Su, H.-L. Huang, J. Qin, C. Wang, S. Unsleber, C. Chen, H. Wang, Y.-M. He,et al., Time-bin-encoded boson sampling with a single-photon device, Physical Review Letters118, 190501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Sempere-Llagostera, R

    S. Sempere-Llagostera, R. Patel, I. Walmsley, and W. Kolthammer, Experimentally finding dense sub- graphs using a time-bin encoded gaussian boson sampling device, Physical Review X12, 031045 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Monika, F

    M. Monika, F. Nosrati, A. George, S. Sciara, R. Fazili, A. L. Marques Muniz, A. Bisianov, R. Lo Franco, W. J. Munro, M. Chemnitz,et al., Quantum state processing through controllable syn- thetic temporal photonic lattices, Nature Photonics 19, 95 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Yu, Z.-P

    S. Yu, Z.-P. Zhong, Y. Fang, R. B. Patel, Q.-P. Li, W. Liu, Z. Li, L. Xu, S. Sagona-Stophel, E. Mer, et al., A universal programmable gaussian boson sampler for drug discovery, Nature Computational Science3, 839 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Demonstration of a quantum C-NOT Gate in a Time-Multiplexed fully reconfigurable photonic processor

    F. Pegoraro, P. Held, J. Lammers, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, Demonstration of a pho- tonic time-multiplexed c-not gate, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02478 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Bouchard, K

    F. Bouchard, K. Fenwick, K. Bonsma-Fisher, D. England, P. J. Bustard, K. Heshami, and B. Sussman, Programmable photonic quantum cir- cuits with ultrafast time-bin encoding, Physical Re- view Letters133, 090601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Ewert and P

    F. Ewert and P. van Loock, 3/4-efficient bell mea- surement with passive linear optics and unentan- gled ancillae, Physical Review Letters113, 140403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Hauser, M

    N. Hauser, M. J. Bayerbach, S. E. D’Aurelio, R. We- ber, M. Santandrea, S. P. Kumar, I. Dhand, and S. Barz, Boosted bell-state measurements for pho- tonic quantum computation, npj Quantum Informa- tion11, 41 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    M. Pant, D. Towsley, D. Englund, and S. Guha, Percolation thresholds for photonic quantum com- puting, Nature Communications10, 1070 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    J. R. Basani, S. K. Vadlamani, S. Bandyopadhyay, D. R. Englund, and R. Hamerly, A self-similar sine– cosine fractal architecture for multiport interferom- eters, Nanophotonics12, 975 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    S. K. Vadlamani, D. Englund, and R. Hamerly, Transferable learning on analog hardware, Science Advances9, eadh3436 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Dhara, D

    P. Dhara, D. Englund, and S. Guha, Entangling quantum memories via heralded photonic bell mea- surement, Physical Review Research5, 033149 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Calsamiglia and N

    J. Calsamiglia and N. Lütkenhaus, Maximum effi- ciencyofalinear-opticalbell-stateanalyzer,Applied Physics B72, 67 (2001)

    work page 2001

  52. [52]

    N. C. Harris, G. R. Steinbrecher, M. Prabhu, Y. Lahini, J. Mower, D. Bunandar, C. Chen, F. N. Wong, T. Baehr-Jones, M. Hochberg,et al., Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor, Nature Photonics11, 447 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain ran- dom lattices, Physical Review109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  54. [54]

    D. Su, C. R. Myers, and K. K. Sabapathy, Con- version of gaussian states to non-gaussian states using photon-number-resolving detectors, Physical Review A100, 052301 (2019). 17

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Konno, W

    S. Konno, W. Asavanant, F. Hanamura, H. Na- gayoshi, K. Fukui, A. Sakaguchi, R. Ide, F. China, M. Yabuno, S. Miki,et al., Logical states for fault- tolerant quantum computation with propagating light, Science383, 289 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Aghaee Rad, T

    H. Aghaee Rad, T. Ainsworth, R. Alexander, B. Al- tieri, M. Askarani, R. Baby, L. Banchi, B. Baragi- ola, J. Bourassa, R. Chadwick,et al., Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer, Nature , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    S. Guha, T. C. John, Z. Gong, and P. Basu, Quantum-enhanced quickest change detection of transmission loss, Physical Review Letters135, 210801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Yu and N

    S. Yu and N. Park, Heavy tails and pruning in pro- grammable photonic circuits for universal unitaries, Nature Communications14, 1853 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Hamerly, J

    R. Hamerly, J. R. Basani, A. Sludds, S. K. Vad- lamani, and D. Englund, Toward the information- theoretic limit of programmable photonics, APL Photonics10, 10.1063/5.0269741 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0269741 2025

  60. [60]

    Mosca, F

    S. Mosca, F. Bilotti, A. Toscano, and L. Vegni, A novel design method for blass matrix beam- forming networks, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation50, 225 (2002)

    work page 2002

  61. [61]

    Taballione, T

    C. Taballione, T. A. Wolterink, J. Lugani, A. Eck- stein, B. A. Bell, R. Grootjans, I. Visscher, D.Geskus, C.G.Roeloffzen, J.J.Renema,et al.,8× 8 reconfigurable quantum photonic processor based on silicon nitride waveguides, Optics Express27, 26842 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Suzuki, K

    K. Suzuki, K. Tanizawa, T. Matsukawa, G. Cong, S.-H. Kim, S. Suda, M. Ohno, T. Chiba, H. Ta- dokoro, M. Yanagihara,et al., Ultra-compact 8×8 strictly-non-blocking si-wire PILOSS switch, Optics Express22, 3887 (2014)

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    Suzuki, R

    K. Suzuki, R. Konoike, J. Hasegawa, S. Suda, H. Matsuura, K. Ikeda, S. Namiki, and H. Kawashima, Low-insertion-loss and power- efficient 32×32 silicon photonics switch with extremely high-δsilica PLC connector, Journal of Lightwave Technology37, 116 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    L. He, M. Zhang, A. Shams-Ansari, R. Zhu, C.Wang,andL.Marko,Low-lossfiber-to-chipinter- face for lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits, Optics Letters44, 2314 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Chang, M

    L. Chang, M. H. Pfeiffer, N. Volet, M. Zervas, J. D. Peters, C. L. Manganelli, E. J. Stanton, Y. Li, T. J. Kippenberg, and J. E. Bowers, Heterogeneous inte- gration of lithium niobate and silicon nitride waveg- uides for wafer-scale photonic integrated circuits on silicon, Optics Letters42, 803 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing, Nature , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    N. T. Arnold, M. Victora, M. E. Goggin, and P. G. Kwiat, Free-space photonic quantum memory, in Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simu- lation III, Vol. 12446 (SPIE, 2023) pp. 25–30

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    Melkozerov, A

    A. Melkozerov, A. Avanesov, I. Dyakonov, and S. Straupe, Analysis of optical loss thresholds in the fusion-based quantum computing architecture, APL Quantum1, 10.1063/5.0214728 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0214728 2024

  69. [69]

    Maring, A

    N. Maring, A. Fyrillas, M. Pont, E. Ivanov, P. Stepanov, N. Margaria, W. Hease, A. Pishcha- gin, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes,et al., A versatile single- photon-based quantum computing platform, Nature Photonics18, 603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    C. Oh, M. Liu, Y. Alexeev, B. Fefferman, and L. Jiang, Classical algorithm for simulating experi- mentalgaussianbosonsampling,NaturePhysics20, 1461 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Basani, Cascaded optical systems approach to neural networks (casoptax),https://github.com/ JasvithBasani/CasOptAx(2024)

    J. Basani, Cascaded optical systems approach to neural networks (casoptax),https://github.com/ JasvithBasani/CasOptAx(2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    N. J. Russell, L. Chakhmakhchyan, J. L. O’Brien, andA.Laing,Directdiallingofhaarrandomunitary matrices, New journal of physics19, 033007 (2017)

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    D. A. Miller, Perfect optics with imperfect compo- nents, Optica2, 747 (2015)

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    Suzuki, G

    K. Suzuki, G. Cong, K. Tanizawa, S.-H. Kim, K.Ikeda, S.Namiki,andH.Kawashima,Ultra-high- extinction-ratio2×2siliconopticalswitchwithvari- able splitter, Optics Express23, 9086 (2015). 18

    work page 2015