Exploring Metamaterial Lasers through Non-Hermitian Scattering Formalism

Mohammad Mehdi Sadeghi; Mustafa Sar{\i}saman; \"Ozge Beyza Vardar; U\u{g}ur Tamer

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 79 references

Exploring Metamaterial Lasers through Non-Hermitian Scattering Formalism

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a negative-index metamaterial slab lases exactly when its spectral-singularity condition and its refractive-index phase condition both hold, and that the same parameters with complex-conjugated index give a coherent…

desk verdict A credible but under-verified extension of spectral singularity lasing theory to Drude-model negative index slabs; the main quantitative claims hinge on an approximation the paper never checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01580 v1 pith:4EZQZLOO submitted 2025-05-02 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph

Özge Beyza Vardar , Uğur Tamer , Mohammad Mehdi Sadeghi , Mustafa Sar{i}saman This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph PACS 03.50.De03.65.Pm42.25.Bs42.25.Gy42.55.-f78.20.-e81.05.Bx

keywords negativeindexmetamaterialsnon-HermitianscatteringspectralsingularitiestransfermatrixlasingthresholdcoherentperfectabsorberTEandTMmodesDrudemodel

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a slab of negative-index metamaterial (NIM) interacting with time-harmonic light, treating the slab as a one-dimensional non-Hermitian scattering system. It derives a transfer matrix for TE and TM incidence and identifies two conditions that must hold together for the slab to lase: a spectral singularity condition, where a transfer-matrix entry vanishes at a real wave number, and a refractive-index phase condition that keeps the imaginary part of the index negative while the real part stays negative. The paper computes the resulting lasing threshold parameters for a Drude-model metamaterial and shows that replacing the refractive index $n$ by its complex conjugate $n^*$ turns the same configuration into a coherent perfect absorber. A sympathetic reader should care because the result gives explicit, tunable parameter ranges for metamaterial slab lasers and their time-reversed absorbers.

What carries the argument

The central object is the transfer matrix $M$ that connects incoming and outgoing wave amplitudes across the slab; spectral singularities are real wave numbers for which the $M_{22}$ entry vanishes, producing purely outgoing waves and a divergent scattering amplitude. Equation (23), obtained from $M_{22}=0$, is the spectral singularity condition, while equation (34) is the refractive-index phase condition derived from demanding $\pi < \vartheta < 3\pi/2$ for the phase of $n=\eta+i\kappa$. The effective oblique-incidence index $\tilde{n} = \sqrt{n^2 - \sin^2\theta}/\cos\theta$ carries the angle dependence, and the small-loss approximation $|\kappa| \ll |\eta|$ converts the phase condition into the explicit lasing inequality and the gain formulas (36).

What would settle it

For a Drude-model NIM slab with independently measured permittivity and permeability, solve the spectral singularity condition (23) directly without the small-loss approximation and compare the predicted lasing wavelength and gain with Eq. (34) and Eq. (36); if lasing occurs at parameters that violate Eq. (34) when $|\kappa|$ is not small compared to $|\eta|$, the paper's explicit threshold formulas would be wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a NIM slab laser exists precisely when the spectral singularity condition (Eq. 23) and the refractive-index lasing condition (Eq. 34) are both satisfied. Writing the refractive index as $n = \eta + i\kappa$, lasing requires the real part to stay negative while the imaginary part becomes negative, which the phase-angle analysis converts into the explicit inequality (34). Under the small-loss approximation $|\kappa| \ll |\eta|$, the spectral singularity condition yields closed-form expressions for the gain coefficient $g_\ell$ and wave number $k_\ell$ in both TE and TM modes. When the electric and magnetic plasma and damping frequencies coincide, the TE and TM spectral singularities merge into a single mode; when those frequencies differ, the modes separate. The same parameters with $n$ replaced by $n^*$ give a coherent perfect absorber, so the lasing and perfect-absorption thresholds coincide.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the imaginary part of the refractive index is much smaller in magnitude than the real part ($|\kappa| \ll |\eta|$), which lets the phase $\tan^{-1}(\kappa/\eta)$ be replaced by $\kappa/\eta$ and turns the lasing condition into the explicit inequality (34).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For a Drude-model NIM with equal electric and magnetic plasma and damping frequencies, TE and TM spectral singularities coincide, so a single lasing mode appears at each threshold point.
The required gain decreases as slab thickness increases, so thicker slabs make the lasing threshold easier to reach.
The system stops lasing at incidence angles beyond a Brewster-like angle, here $\theta_B \approx 89.979^\circ$ for the chosen parameters.
Replacing the gain index $n$ by the lossy index $n^*$ at the same parameters yields coherent perfect absorption, making the lasing and CPA thresholds identical.
When electric and magnetic plasma and damping frequencies differ, TE and TM lasing modes split apart, and TM mode lases more easily for the sample parameters considered.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the small-loss approximation fails, as it can near metamaterial resonances, inequality (34) should be replaced by the exact phase equation; the corrected thresholds could differ noticeably, so Eq. (34) is best read as a design guide valid away from resonance.
The same transfer-matrix machinery could be extended to multilayer or spatially graded NIM stacks, where spectral singularities would arise from products of transfer matrices rather than a single slab.
The predicted Brewster-angle cutoff suggests a direct experimental check: fixing the gain and sweeping the incidence angle should show a sharp lasing cutoff near $\theta_B$ for the stated material parameters.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

Quick take: this is a plausible extension of the known spectral-singularity/transfer-matrix machinery to a Drude-model negative index metamaterial slab. It is not a breakthrough, but it does something concrete: it gives explicit lasing threshold and CPA conditions in terms of plasma and damping frequencies, including a TE/TM mode resolution and a Brewster angle effect that I don't think are in the earlier literature.

What the paper does well: the physics is standard and the central condition, Eq. (23), is the usual slab lasing condition with surface conductivities, reducing to the textbook result at normal incidence and zero surface conductivity. The derivation is sketched, but the steps are plausible. The demonstration figures use the Drude parameters as inputs, so the circularity burden is low. The Brewster angle observation is new and interesting.

Where the paper is soft: the transfer matrix that leads to Eq. (23) is not shown; we just get the boundary conditions and then the result. That is acceptable in a short paper, but a referee should ask for the algebra or a citation that gives it. More importantly, the step from Eq. (33) to Eq. (34) uses the small-loss approximation |κ|<<|η|, justified by 'typical for many materials.' The paper never quantifies |κ/η| for the parameters in the figures, even though it admits NIMs are lossy. The stress-test is right that Eq. (33) has a sign inconsistency — the inequalities go the wrong way — which looks like a typo but needs fixing. And the approximation is load-bearing for the explicit lasing inequality (34) and the gain formulas (36). For the specific Drude parameters in (39) the ratio κ/η is probably tiny, so the approximation likely holds; the authors should say so explicitly and check the plotted spectral-singularity points against it.

There is no experimental or numerical validation; the figures are computed with the same formulas being derived. That is fine for a theory paper, but a comparison with an exact numerical solution of (23) would strengthen it.

Who should read it: people working on metamaterial lasers or non-Hermitian slab optics. It's a useful recipe, not a landmark. I would send it to peer review; the issues are fixable and the topic is of interest. Ask the authors to include the transfer-matrix derivation, fix the sign in (33), and check the small-loss condition for their example parameters.

Best,

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a non-Hermitian scattering formalism for a Drude-model negative-index metamaterial slab and derives conditions for lasing and coherent perfect absorption. Its central results are the spectral singularity condition in Eq. (23), the refractive-index inequality in Eq. (34), and the gain/wave-number formulas in Eq. (36), supported by demonstration plots in Figs. 4-8. The paper claims that a NIM system lases whenever both Eqs. (34) and (23) are satisfied, and that replacing the complex index n by its conjugate gives a CPA.

Significance. If established, these results would provide an explicit parametric route to metamaterial slab lasers and coherent perfect absorbers, extending spectral singularity theory to dispersive, lossy negative-index media. The paper uses standard transfer-matrix and Maxwell-equation tools and cites relevant literature. However, the quantitative deliverables currently rest on an uncontrolled small-loss approximation and on a derivation of Eq. (23) that is not displayed in the manuscript. No experimental or independent numerical validation is provided. The significance is therefore conditional rather than immediate.

major comments (4)

[Section B, Eqs. (33)-(34)] The derivation of Eq. (34) from Eq. (33) replaces tan^{-1}(κ/η) with κ/η under the assertion |κ| << |η|, which is never quantified for the Drude parameters used in Figs. 4-8. The inequality (34) itself admits values of the enclosed ratio up to π/2, so the small-angle replacement is not uniformly valid in the allowed range. The text also concedes that lossy metamaterials exhibit significant loss, so the approximation is not automatic. Please report |κ/η| at the spectral-singularity points and compare exact solutions of Eq. (33) with the approximate Eq. (34) for the parameters used in the figures.
[Eq. (33) vs Eq. (34)] There is a sign inconsistency: Eq. (33) is printed as (2-m)π > 2 tan^{-1}(κ/η) > (3-m)π, while Eq. (34), which is claimed to follow from it, uses (2-m)π < [expression] < (3-m)π. Repeating the algebra from Eq. (32) gives the '<' form, so Eq. (33) is at least a typographical error; as written, the two equations contradict each other.
[Section II, derivation of Eq. (23)] The transfer-matrix construction is not shown. Although the boundary conditions appear in Table II, the assembly of the transfer matrix M and the simplification to the compact spectral-singularity condition Eq. (23) are absent, so the central equation cannot be checked from the manuscript. The intermediate steps or a supplementary derivation are needed.
[Concluding remarks and Eq. (36)] The concluding claim that the method 'calculates exactly the lasing threshold condition' is not supported for the gain formulas (36), since they are derived under the same unverified small-loss approximation and are not cross-checked against exact solutions of Eq. (23). Please provide a numerical comparison for the parameters of Eq. (39) or the hypothetical sample of Fig. 7.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract] The abstract is descriptive rather than informative; it does not state the derived conditions or their quantitative content. Please summarize the actual results.
[Eq. (21)] The symbol Z0 is used in the definition of ¯nℓ but is never defined; if it denotes the vacuum impedance, please state it explicitly.
[Fig. 6 caption] The caption mentions a right panel covering the whole range and a left panel near Brewster's angle, but the figure appears to be a single panel with an inset. Please align the caption with the actual layout.
[Eq. (36)] The expression for gℓ has dimensions of inverse length, but the formula as written includes L in the denominator while kℓ also depends on L; please verify the dimensional consistency and define all variables.
[Concluding remarks] There is a typo, 'condisiton' for 'condition' in the final paragraph; please proofread throughout.
[References] Several references are incomplete or inconsistent in style (e.g., [26] omits the author list and uses an unusual format); please unify the bibliography.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the lasing and CPA conditions are derived in-paper from Maxwell/Drude equations and the transfer matrix, with no fitted quantity recycled as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central deliverables are Eq. (23), the spectral-singularity condition obtained by setting M22=0 in the transfer matrix constructed from the slab boundary conditions, and Eq. (34), an explicit refractive-index sign condition obtained from the Drude-model index with a stated small-loss approximation |kappa|<<|eta|. Neither step fits a parameter to the quantity it later claims to predict. The material parameters in Eq. (39) and the demonstration figures are literature or hand-chosen inputs, not outputs of an inversion. Eq. (36) solves the spectral-singularity condition algebraically in the adopted approximation rather than reusing a fitted constant. The CPA statement follows from the standard time-reversal relation n -> n* and is attributed to independent work on coherent perfect absorption. The self-citations to Mostafazadeh and Sarisaman supply background formalism for spectral singularities and non-Hermitian scattering, but the slab-specific transfer matrix and conditions are derived in the manuscript from Maxwell's equations, so the cited results are not the load-bearing source of the derivation. No step was found in which a prediction is equivalent by construction to an input, and therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central conditions rest on standard Maxwell and Drude modeling plus a small-loss assumption. No fitted free parameters appear in the main formulas; the demonstration figures use hand-chosen material and geometry parameters as inputs. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

demonstration plasma and damping frequencies = ωpe=10^12 s^-1, ωpm=10^5 s^-1, Γe=10^8 s^-1, Γm=10^4 s^-1
Chosen by hand for the figure 7 demonstration; not fitted to data and not needed for the general conditions (23) and (34).
demonstration geometry parameters = θ=30°, L=1.5 μm
Arbitrary choices for the illustrative parameter study; not part of the central derivation.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Drude model for electric and magnetic responses of the metamaterial (Eqs. 1-11)
The effective permittivity and permeability are modeled with plasma and damping frequencies; this is a standard but specific material model.
domain assumption Homogeneous slab with uniform complex refractive index
The slab is taken as uniform with compact support, ignoring the sub-wavelength microstructure of the metamaterial.
standard math Time-harmonic plane-wave ansatz and TE/TM decomposition
Standard separation of variables for a linear, homogeneous medium.
domain assumption Boundary conditions without surface conductivities
The paper argues no free surface currents arise, so σ_j,xy = 0, simplifying the transfer matrix.
ad hoc to paper Small-loss approximation |κ| << |η|
Adopted to linearize tan^{-1}(κ/η) in the derivation of Eq. (34); not proven for the parameter range of interest.
domain assumption Existence of gain medium with negative imaginary part of the refractive index
Lasing requires Im(n) < 0; the paper assumes this is achievable in the metamaterial.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring Metamaterial Lasers through Non-Hermitian Scattering Formalism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4EZQZLOO

@misc{pith2026250501580,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring Metamaterial Lasers through Non-Hermitian Scattering Formalism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4EZQZLOO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01580}
}

read the original abstract

This study explores the exciting properties of metamaterials and their innovative applications in non-Hermitian physics, with particular emphasis on the scattering formalism, a key topic of recent research. We have analyzed how light behaves in a negative index metamaterial (NIM), allowing us to develop a transfer matrix and identify the essential conditions for the occurrence of spectral singularities. These findings are crucial for fine-tuning system parameters that will drive the development of metamaterial slab lasers and coherent perfect absorber (CPA) systems. Overall, our research demonstrates the enormous potential of metamaterials and their significant role in driving innovation in various technology areas.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01580 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1: (Color Online) Figure displays the TE (left panel) and TM (right panel) mode configurations for the interaction of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: Perspective view of lasing configuration in a metama [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4: Pictorial figure showing the spectral singularity points [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Graphs showing the real and imaginary parts of re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: Figure depicts the dependence of gain value upon the angle of incidence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7: Figure shows the distribution of the spectral singularities in gain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: Perspective view of CPA configuration in a metama [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

[1]

Boundary conditions across the surfaceS between two regions of space are given by the statements: 1) Tangen- tial component of electric field ⃗E is continuous across the interface, ˆn× (⃗E1− ⃗E2) = 0; 2) Normal component of magnetic field vector ⃗B is continuous, ˆn· (⃗B1− ⃗B2) = 0

work page
[2]

Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,

J. B. Pendry, “Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Physical review letters, 85(18), 3961, (2000)

work page 2000
[3]

In our wave configuration, the third condition does not ex- ist since there is no normal component of ⃗D field

Normal component of electric flux density vector ⃗D is discontinuous by an amount equal to the surface current density, ˆn· (⃗D1− ⃗D2) = ρs; 4) Tangential component of the field ⃗H is discontinuous by an amount equal to the surface current density, ˆn× (⃗H1− ⃗H2) = ⃗Js. In our wave configuration, the third condition does not ex- ist since there is no norm...

work page
[4]

The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative permittivity and permeability,

V. G. Veselago, “The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative permittivity and permeability,” Soviet physics solid state, 8(11) , 2500-2501, (1967)

work page 1967
[5]

Negative- refraction metamaterials: fundamental principles and ap- plications

G. V. Eleftheriades and K. G .Balmain. “Negative- refraction metamaterials: fundamental principles and ap- plications”. John Wiley and Sons, (2005)

work page 2005
[6]

Linear and nonlinear wave propagation in negative refraction metamaterials,

V. M. Agranovich, et al. “Linear and nonlinear wave propagation in negative refraction metamaterials,” Phys- ical Review B, 69.16, 165112, (2004)

work page 2004
[7]

Metamaterials and negative refractive index,

D. R. Smith, J. B. Pendry, and Mike CK Wiltshire, “Metamaterials and negative refractive index,” Science, 305.5685, 788-792, (2004)

work page 2004
[8]

Negative refraction in semicon- ductor metamaterials,

A. J. Hoffman, et al. “Negative refraction in semicon- ductor metamaterials,” Nature materials, 6.12, 946-950, (2007)

work page 2007

Show all 79 references

[9]

Optical anisotropic metamaterials: Negative refraction and fo- cusing,

A. Fang, T. Koschny, and C. M.Soukoulis, “Optical anisotropic metamaterials: Negative refraction and fo- cusing,” Physical Review B, 79.24, 245127, (2009)

2009
[10]

Negative refractive index metamaterials in optics,

N. M. Litchinitser, et al., “Negative refractive index metamaterials in optics,” Progress in Optics, 51, 1-67, (2008)

2008
[11]

Perfect lensing by a single interface: defying loss and bandwidth limita- tions of metamaterials,

G. Rosenblatt, and M. Orenstein, “Perfect lensing by a single interface: defying loss and bandwidth limita- tions of metamaterials,” Physical review letters, 115.19, 195504, (2015)

2015
[12]

Birefringent left-handed metamate- rials and perfect lenses for vectorial fields,

A. A. Zharov, et al., “Birefringent left-handed metamate- rials and perfect lenses for vectorial fields,” New Journal of Physics, 7.1, 220, (2005)

2005
[13]

Theory of the perfect lens,

X. Zhang, and S. R. Forrest, “Theory of the perfect lens,” Physical Review B, 84.4, 045427, (2011)

2011
[14]

Perfect negative refraction lens using a single homogeneous isotropic metamaterial,

Z. S. Liu,et al, “Perfect negative refraction lens using a single homogeneous isotropic metamaterial,” Physical review letters, 99(23), 233901, (2007)

2007
[15]

Metama- terial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies,

D. Schurig, J. B. Pendry, and D. R. Smith, “Metama- terial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies,” Science, 311(5758), 1661-1664, (2006)

2006
[16]

Metamaterials: Microwave ap- plications,

C. M. Holloway,et al., “Metamaterials: Microwave ap- plications,” Physical Review B, 72(11), 113104, (2005)

2005
[17]

One-dimensional negative refrac- tive index metamaterials,

S. A. Cummer, et al., “One-dimensional negative refrac- tive index metamaterials,” Nature, 427(6974), 899-903, (2004)

2004
[18]

Metamaterial design using machine learning,

J. Zhu, and A. Feng, “Metamaterial design using machine learning,” Materials Today, 20(11), 585-594, (2017)

2017
[19]

Metamaterials with negative refractive index at optical wavelengths,

W. Cai, et al., “Metamaterials with negative refractive index at optical wavelengths,” Science, 330(6004), 521- 525, (2010)

2010
[20]

Metamaterial platforms for spin- tronic modulation of mid-infrared response under very weak magnetic field,

G. Armelles, et al., “Metamaterial platforms for spin- tronic modulation of mid-infrared response under very weak magnetic field,” ACS Photonics, 5.10, 3956-3961, 11 (2018)

2018
[21]

Functional Nanostructures and Metama- terials for Superconducting Spintronics,

A. Sidorenko, “Functional Nanostructures and Metama- terials for Superconducting Spintronics,” Cham, Switzer- land: Springer International Publishing (2018)

2018
[22]

Spin-optical metamaterial route to spin-controlled photonics,

N. Shitrit, et al., “Spin-optical metamaterial route to spin-controlled photonics,” Science, 340.6133, 724-726, (2013)

2013
[23]

Bioinspired metamaterials with tunable mechanical properties,

P. Liu,et al., “Bioinspired metamaterials with tunable mechanical properties,” Nature materials, 9(8), 694-701, (2010)

2010
[24]

Zero-index terahertz quantum-cascade metamaterial lasers,

Amir Ali Tavallaee, et al., “Zero-index terahertz quantum-cascade metamaterial lasers,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 46(7), 1091-1098, (2010)

2010
[25]

Ultrathin, metamaterial-based laser cavities,

Richard W. Ziolkowski, “Ultrathin, metamaterial-based laser cavities,” JOSA B, 23(3), 451-460, (2006)

2006
[26]

Active and tunable metama- terials,

Allan D. Boardman, et al., “Active and tunable metama- terials,” Laser and Photonics Reviews, 5(2)5, 287-307, (2011)

2011
[27]

Coherent perfect absorber and laser modes in purely imaginary metamaterials,

Fu Yangyang, et al., “Coherent perfect absorber and laser modes in purely imaginary metamaterials,” Physical Re- view A, 96(4), 043838, (2017)

2017
[28]

Mostafazadeh, Phys

A. Mostafazadeh, Phys. Rev. Lett. (102), 220402 (2009)

2009
[29]

Ge- ometric Methods in Physics, Trends in Mathematics,

A. Mostafazadeh, edited by P. Kielanowski, P. Bieliavsky, A. Odzijewicz, M. Schlichenmaier, and T. Voronov, “Ge- ometric Methods in Physics, Trends in Mathematics,” Springer, Cham, 1412.0454, 145-165,(2015)

2015 arXiv
[30]

M. A. Naimark, Trudy Moscov. Mat. Obsc. 3, 181 (1954) in Russian, English translation: Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. (2), 16, 103, (1960)

1954
[31]

G. Sh. Guseinov, Pramana J. Phys. 73, 587, (2009)

2009
[32]

Mostafazadeh, M

A. Mostafazadeh, M. Sarisaman, Phys. Lett. A, (375), 3387, (2011); Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., (468), 3224, (2012); Phys. Rev. A (87), 063834, (2013); Phys. Rev. A, (88), 033810, (2013); Phys. Rev. A (91), 043804, (2015)

2011
[33]

Lasing with Topo- logical Weyl Semimetal,

G. Oktay, M. Sarısaman, and M. Tas, “Lasing with Topo- logical Weyl Semimetal,” Scientific Reports,10(1), 3127, (2020); doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59423-3

2020 doi
[34]

Point interactions, metamaterials, and PT-symmetry,

A. Mostafazadeh, “Point interactions, metamaterials, and PT-symmetry,” Annals of Physics, 368, 56-69, (2016)

2016
[35]

Scattering of Trans- verse Electric and Transverse Magnetic Waves and Quan- tum Dynamics Generated by non-Hermitian Hamiltoni- ans,

F. Loran, and A. Mostafazadeh, “Scattering of Trans- verse Electric and Transverse Magnetic Waves and Quan- tum Dynamics Generated by non-Hermitian Hamiltoni- ans,” Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2024.12, 123A01, (2024)

2024
[36]

C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243, (1998); K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. H. Musslimani, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 103904, (2008)

1998
[37]

Mostafazadeh, Int

A. Mostafazadeh, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., (7), 1191, (2010); C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and H. F. Jones, Am. J. Phys., (71), 1095, (2003)

2010
[38]

Longhi, Phys

S. Longhi, Phys. Rev. A, (82), 032111, (2010)

2010
[39]

Longhi, J

S. Longhi, J. Phys. A, 44, 485302, (2011)

2011
[40]

Non- hermitian physics,

Yuto Ashida, Zongping Gong, and Masahito Ueda, “Non- hermitian physics,” Advances in Physics,69(3), 249-435, (2020)

2020
[41]

Symmetry and topology in non- Hermitian physics,

Kohei Kawabata, et al., “Symmetry and topology in non- Hermitian physics,” Physical Review X, 9(4), 041015, (2019)

2019
[42]

Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry,

Ramy El-Ganainy, et al, “Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry,” Nature Physics, 14(1), 11-19, (2018)

2018
[43]

Non-Hermitian topological phenomena: A review,

Nobuyuki Okuma, and Masatoshi Sato, “Non-Hermitian topological phenomena: A review,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, (14), 83-107, (2023)

2023
[44]

Topological physics of non- Hermitian optics and photonics: a review,

Hongfei Wang, et al., “Topological physics of non- Hermitian optics and photonics: a review,” Journal of Optics, (23.12), 123001, (2021)

2021
[45]

Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems,

Emil J. Bergholtz, Jan Carl Budich, and Flore K. Kunst, “Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems,” Re- views of Modern Physics, (93.1), 015005, (2021)

2021
[46]

Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamil- tonians,

Carl M. Bender, “Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamil- tonians,” Reports on Progress in Physics, (70.6), 947, (2007)

2007
[47]

Non- Hermitian topological systems

Miguel A. Bandres, and Mordechai Segev, “Non- Hermitian topological systems”, Physics, (11), 96, (2018)

2018
[48]

Non- Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries,

Kun Ding, Chen Fang, and Guancong Ma, “Non- Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries,” Nature Reviews Physics, (4.12), 745-760, (2022)

2022
[49]

Non-Hermitian quantum mechan- ics,

Nimrod Moiseyev, “Non-Hermitian quantum mechan- ics,” Cambridge University Press, (2011)

2011
[50]

New topological in- variants in non-Hermitian systems,

Ananya Ghatak, and Tanmoy Das, “New topological in- variants in non-Hermitian systems,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, (31.26), 263001, (2019)

2019
[51]

Topological states of non-Hermitian systems,

V. M. Martinez Alvarez, et al., “Topological states of non-Hermitian systems,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics, (227), 1295-1308, (2018)

2018
[52]

Topological phases of non- Hermitian systems,

Zongping Gong, et al, “Topological phases of non- Hermitian systems,” Physical Review X, (8.3), 031079, (2018)

2018
[53]

Mostafazadeh and M

A. Mostafazadeh and M. Sarisaman, Ann. Phys. (NY), (375), 265-287, (2016)

2016
[54]

Mostafazadeh, Phys

A. Mostafazadeh, Phys. Rev. A, (83), 045801,(2011)

2011
[55]

Mostafazadeh, Phys

A. Mostafazadeh, Phys. Rev. A, (87), 012103,(2012)

2012
[56]

Spectral singularities and tunable slab lasers with 2D material coating,

Ghaemi-Dizicheh, Hamed, Ali Mostafazadeh, and Mustafa Sarısaman, “Spectral singularities and tunable slab lasers with 2D material coating,” JOSA B, (37.7), 2128-2138, (2020)

2020
[57]

Broadband coherent perfect absorber with PT-symmetric 2D-materials,

M. Sarısaman, and M. Tas, “Broadband coherent perfect absorber with PT-symmetric 2D-materials,” Annals of Physics, (401), 139-148, (2019)

2019
[58]

Error analysis of mixed finite element meth- ods for wave propagation in double negative metamateri- als,

J. Li, “Error analysis of mixed finite element meth- ods for wave propagation in double negative metamateri- als,” Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 209(1), 81-96, (2007)

2007
[59]

Loss and gain in metamaterials,

Lagarkov, Andrey N., Vladimir N. Kisel, and Andrey K. Sarychev. “Loss and gain in metamaterials,” JOSA B, 27.4,648-659, (2010)

2010
[60]

Active nanoplasmonic metamaterials,

O. Hess, et al., “Active nanoplasmonic metamaterials,” Nature materials, 11.7,573-584, (2012)

2012
[61]

Overcoming losses with gain in a negative refractive index metamaterial,

Wuestner, Sebastian, et al., “Overcoming losses with gain in a negative refractive index metamaterial,” Physical re- view letters, 105.12,127401, (2010)

2010
[62]

Tempo- ral metamaterials with gain and loss,

Pacheco-Pe˜ na, Victor, and Nader Engheta, “Tempo- ral metamaterials with gain and loss,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2108.01007 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[63]

Mathematical and numerical study of wave propagation in negative-index materials,

J. Li, Y. Chen, and V. Elander, “Mathematical and numerical study of wave propagation in negative-index materials,” Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 197(45-48), 3976-3987,(2008)

2008
[64]

Solving metamaterial Maxwell’s equations via a vector wave integro-differential equation,

Y. Huang, J. Li, and W. Yang, “Solving metamaterial Maxwell’s equations via a vector wave integro-differential equation,” Computers and Mathematics with Applica- tions, 63(12), 1597-1606, (2012). 12

2012
[65]

Maxwell’s equations in presence of metama- terials,

M. Rihani, “Maxwell’s equations in presence of metama- terials,” (Doctoral dissertation, Institut polytechnique de Paris), (2022)

2022
[66]

Pulsed and CW Gaussian beam interactions with double negative metamaterial slabs,

R. W. Ziolkowski, “Pulsed and CW Gaussian beam interactions with double negative metamaterial slabs,” Opt. Exp., (11), 662–681, (2003)

2003
[67]

Chalcogenide-based, all-dielectric, ultrathin metamaterials with perfect, incidence-angle sensitive, mid-infrared absorption: inverse design, anal- ysis, and applications,

R. Avrahamy, et al., “Chalcogenide-based, all-dielectric, ultrathin metamaterials with perfect, incidence-angle sensitive, mid-infrared absorption: inverse design, anal- ysis, and applications,” Nanoscale, 13.26, 11455-11469, (2021)

2021
[68]

A wide-angle shift-free metamaterial filter design for anti-laser striking application,

J.N. Monks, et al., “A wide-angle shift-free metamaterial filter design for anti-laser striking application,” Optics Communications, 429, 53-59 (2018)

2018
[69]

Selective metamaterial perfect ab- sorber for infrared and 1.54 laser compatible stealth tech- nology,

Xiaoli Chen,et al., “Selective metamaterial perfect ab- sorber for infrared and 1.54 laser compatible stealth tech- nology,” Optik, (172), 840-846, (2018)

2018
[70]

A wide-angle shift-free meta- material filter design for anti-laser striking application,

James N. Monks, et al. “A wide-angle shift-free meta- material filter design for anti-laser striking application,” Optics Communications, (429), 53-59, (2018)

2018
[71]

Perfect metamaterial absorber im- proved laser-driven flyer,

Xiangbo Ji,et al., “Perfect metamaterial absorber im- proved laser-driven flyer,” Nanophotonics, (10.10), 2683-2693, (2021)

2021
[72]

Metamaterial absorber integrated mi- crofluidic terahertz sensors,

Xin Hu, et al., “Metamaterial absorber integrated mi- crofluidic terahertz sensors,” Laser and Photonics Re- views, (10.6), 962-969, (2016)

2016
[73]

Controllable flatbands via non- Hermiticity,

Lin, Shirong, et al., “Controllable flatbands via non- Hermiticity,” Applied Physics Letters, 123.22, (2023)

2023
[74]

Hybrid anisotropic plasmonic metasurfaces with multiple resonances of focused light beams,

Liang, Yao, et al., “Hybrid anisotropic plasmonic metasurfaces with multiple resonances of focused light beams,” Nano Letters, 21.20, 8917-8923, (2021)

2021
[75]

Coherent Perfect Absorbers: Time-Reversed Lasers,

Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, “Coherent Perfect Absorbers: Time-Reversed Lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. (105), 053901, (2010); W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-Reversed Lasing and Interferometric Control of Absorption,” Science, (331), ...

2010
[76]

From local to non- local high-Q plasmonic metasurfaces,

Y. Liang, P. T. Din and Y. Kivshar, “From local to non- local high-Q plasmonic metasurfaces,” Physical Review Letters, 133.5, 053801, (2024)

2024
[77]

Plasma meets metamaterials: Three ways to advance space micropropulsion systems,

I. Levchenko, S. Xu, O. Cherkun, O. Baranov, and K. Bazaka, “Plasma meets metamaterials: Three ways to advance space micropropulsion systems,” Advances in Physics: X, 6(1), (2020)

2020
[78]

Z = (E,H )

We use TZ = (TE, TM), but in field configurations Z denotes for E or H, i.e. Z = (E,H )
[79]

They are not related to TE or TM mode symbols, but they repre- sent components of the associated currents

Here, indices α and β may cause a confusion. They are not related to TE or TM mode symbols, but they repre- sent components of the associated currents

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Boundary conditions across the surfaceS between two regions of space are given by the statements: 1) Tangen- tial component of electric field ⃗E is continuous across the interface, ˆn× (⃗E1− ⃗E2) = 0; 2) Normal component of magnetic field vector ⃗B is continuous, ˆn· (⃗B1− ⃗B2) = 0

work page

[2] [2]

Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,

J. B. Pendry, “Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Physical review letters, 85(18), 3961, (2000)

work page 2000

[3] [3]

In our wave configuration, the third condition does not ex- ist since there is no normal component of ⃗D field

Normal component of electric flux density vector ⃗D is discontinuous by an amount equal to the surface current density, ˆn· (⃗D1− ⃗D2) = ρs; 4) Tangential component of the field ⃗H is discontinuous by an amount equal to the surface current density, ˆn× (⃗H1− ⃗H2) = ⃗Js. In our wave configuration, the third condition does not ex- ist since there is no norm...

work page

[4] [4]

The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative permittivity and permeability,

V. G. Veselago, “The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative permittivity and permeability,” Soviet physics solid state, 8(11) , 2500-2501, (1967)

work page 1967

[5] [5]

Negative- refraction metamaterials: fundamental principles and ap- plications

G. V. Eleftheriades and K. G .Balmain. “Negative- refraction metamaterials: fundamental principles and ap- plications”. John Wiley and Sons, (2005)

work page 2005

[6] [6]

Linear and nonlinear wave propagation in negative refraction metamaterials,

V. M. Agranovich, et al. “Linear and nonlinear wave propagation in negative refraction metamaterials,” Phys- ical Review B, 69.16, 165112, (2004)

work page 2004

[7] [7]

Metamaterials and negative refractive index,

D. R. Smith, J. B. Pendry, and Mike CK Wiltshire, “Metamaterials and negative refractive index,” Science, 305.5685, 788-792, (2004)

work page 2004

[8] [8]

Negative refraction in semicon- ductor metamaterials,

A. J. Hoffman, et al. “Negative refraction in semicon- ductor metamaterials,” Nature materials, 6.12, 946-950, (2007)

work page 2007