REVIEW 2 cited by
Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is pivotal in enhancing the robustness, reliability, and interpretability of Machine Learning (ML) systems for healthcare, optimizing resources and improving patient care. Despite the emergence of ML-based clinical decision support tools, the lack of principled quantification of uncertainty in ML models remains a major challenge. Current reviews have a narrow focus on analyzing the state-of-the-art UQ in specific healthcare domains without systematically evaluating method efficacy across different stages of model development, and despite a growing body of research, its implementation in healthcare applications remains limited. Therefore, in this survey, we provide a comprehensive analysis of current UQ in healthcare, offering an informed framework that highlights how different methods can be integrated into each stage of the ML pipeline including data processing, training and evaluation. We also highlight the most popular methods used in healthcare and novel approaches from other domains that hold potential for future adoption in the medical context. We expect this study will provide a clear overview of the challenges and opportunities of implementing UQ in the ML pipeline for healthcare, guiding researchers and practitioners in selecting suitable techniques to enhance the reliability, safety and trust from patients and clinicians on ML-driven healthcare solutions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Integrating Neural Encoders in Bayesian Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Multimodal Data
Two-stage neural-encoder GLMMs with variance-corrected SGLD recover full-data MCMC posteriors and quantify modality importance at population and subject levels without losing predictive accuracy.
-
SafeImpute: Reliable Clinical Data Imputation via Conformal Selection
An event-graph GNN plus conformal FDR selection can impute irregular clinical labs and release only a subset with controlled rates of clinically large errors.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.