Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 58 references

Joyce structures and poles of Painlev\'e equations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives explicit Plebański functions for two Joyce structures attached to Painlevé III3 and Painlevé II, and identifies the resulting tau functions with the corresponding Painlevé tau functions.

desk verdict Strong computations with a clear error in the stated S functions: the Plebański formulas look right, but Theorems 3.1(ii) and 3.2(ii) don't match the paper's own expansions. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03429 v1 pith:EE2BWJ37 submitted 2025-05-06 math-ph hep-thmath.MPnlin.SI

Tom Bridgeland , Fabrizio Del Monte This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phhep-thmath.MPnlin.SI MSC 34M5534M5653C2614H7032G34
keywords JoycestructuresPainlevéequationsPlebańskifunctionsquadraticdifferentialsisomonodromicdeformationstauclassStheorieshyperkählergeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Joyce structures are geometric structures encoding Donaldson–Thomas invariants, and the defining ingredient is a single function $W$ called the Plebański function. This paper obtains explicit rational formulas for $W$ in the two class $S[A_1]$ examples associated to Painlevé III$_3$ and Painlevé II, together with the regularity function $S$ on the zero section and the flat coordinates of the associated linear Joyce connection. It also computes the Joyce-structure tau function and shows that, restricted to the usual Painlevé flows, it reproduces the Painlevé III$_3$ and Painlevé II tau functions. This gives concrete, checkable geometric content for two Joyce structures and offers a blueprint for the remaining Painlevé Joyce structures, whose behaviour near the zero section is related to poles of Painlevé equations.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a pencil of connections $\nabla_{\epsilon}=d-A_0\,dx-\epsilon^{-1}\Phi\,dx$ with a nontrivial reference connection, transformed by a singular gauge change into an oper $y''=Q(x)y$ with one apparent singularity. The canonical Joyce coordinates $(z_i,\theta_j)$ are period integrals of the Seiberg–Witten differential $y\,dx$ and the meromorphic differential $-Q_1\,dx/(2y)$ over cycles on an elliptic spectral curve. Isomonodromic flows preserving the generalized monodromy are computed in these coordinates, and Riemann bilinear identities convert the period relations into the flow form controlled by a single Plebański function $W$. To reach the zero section, the spectral curve is uniformized by Weierstrass functions; independently, the same limit is approached through double poles of the Painlevé solution, giving an $\epsilon$-deformed analytic route to the regularity statements.

What would settle it

Compute the vector fields (128) and (209) numerically for a generic point by integrating the linear systems (78) and (37) at fixed $\epsilon$ and comparing the generalized monodromy before and after moving along the flow; any deviation at fourth order in the $\theta$ variables would falsify the corresponding formula for $W$. Alternatively, evaluate the logarithmic derivatives (34) and (41) at a numerical point and compare them with an independent Fredholm-determinant computation of the Painlevé III$_3$ or Painlevé II tau function.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the two examples the Plebański function is an explicit rational function of the isomonodromy coordinates. For pole orders $m=(3,3)$ (Painlevé III$_3$) it is $$W=\frac{pq}{6($H^{{2}}$-4t)}\bigl(tq+(H+6tq)r+(6H+12tq)$r^{{2}}$+$8p^{{2}}$$q^{{2}}$$r^{{3}}$\bigr),$$ and for $m=(8)$ (Painlevé II) it is $$W=\frac{p}{48H($t^{{2}}$-8H)}\bigl(-tq-2r($2t^{{2}}$+$3q^{{2}}$t-12H)+$12r^{{2}}$q(-$t^{{2}}$-$q^{{2}}$t+4H)-$8r^{{3}}$$p^{{2}}$t\bigr).$$ In both cases $W$ is regular along the locus $\theta=0$, with $$S=\log($H^{{2}}$-4t)-\tfrac{1}{24},\qquad S=\log($H^{{2}}$(8H-$t^{{2}}$))-\tfrac{1}{48},$$ respectively. The flat coordinates of the linear Joyce connection are $(\log t,H)$ for the first example and $(t,H-\tfrac{1}{8}t^{2})$ for the second. On the locus $r=0$ the logarithmic derivative of the Joyce tau function equals the classical action differential up to an exact term and a monodromy-dependent normalization, so the Joyce tau function restricts to the Painlevé III$_3$ and Painlevé II tau functions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the period integrals $(z_i,\theta_j)$ give the canonical Joyce-structure coordinates, which rests on a conjectural uniqueness property of the oper with the prescribed apparent singularity, while the tau-function equality additionally depends on a choice of logarithmic Fock–Goncharov coordinates and on setting one primitive to zero on a Lagrangian.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The two Plebański functions give complete, checkable descriptions of the associated complex hyperkähler metrics and twistor spaces.
  • The flat coordinates of the linear Joyce connection are explicitly $\log t,H$ for Painlevé III$_3$ and $t,H-\tfrac18 t^2$ for Painlevé II.
  • The restriction of the Joyce tau function to $r=0$ recovers the Painlevé tau functions, so the Joyce tau function extends isomonodromic tau functions to families with nontrivial reference connection.
  • Poles of the Painlevé equations can be used analytically to probe the zero-section behaviour of the corresponding Joyce structures, providing an alternative to uniformization.
  • The form $S=\log\Delta-c$ in both examples supports a general identification of the zero-section data with the Bergman tau function or the Nekrasov–Shatashvili free energy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same direct-calculational scheme should produce rational Plebański functions and $S=\log\Delta-c$ for the remaining Painlevé Joyce structures; this is checkable as soon as the general meromorphic construction appears.
  • If the relation between $W$ near $\theta=0$ and the Nekrasov–Shatashvili free energy is generic, the higher-order terms in the pole expansion of $W$ should reconstruct further NS free-energy corrections.
  • The tau-function identification depends on a choice of logarithmic Fock–Goncharov coordinates on the twistor fibre, suggesting that the Joyce tau function is defined only relative to extra twistor data; a coordinate-invariant formulation would sharpen all comparisons with Painlevé tau functions.
  • The involution preserving the Plebański function in the Painlevé III$_3$ example may reflect a symmetry of the underlying Donaldson–Thomas stability space, and exploiting it could simplify the general class $S[A_1]$ construction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies two examples of Joyce structures of class S[A1], associated to the Painlevé III3 and Painlevé II equations, on the base spaces of quadratic differentials with pole orders m=(3,3) and m=(8). For each example the authors derive an explicit rational formula for the Plebański function W in terms of natural isomonodromy coordinates, compute the induced linear Joyce connection, and identify the Joyce-structure tau function restricted to the locus r=0 with the corresponding Painlevé tau function. They also analyse the behaviour of W near the zero section through uniformisation of the spectral curve and through the pole structure of the Painlevé equations, obtaining a function S satisfying ∂W/∂θ_i|0 = ∂S/∂z_i. The paper is presented as a systematic blueprint for constructing Joyce structures from meromorphic quadratic differentials.

Significance. If the explicit Plebański formulas are correct, the paper provides valuable concrete data for two non-trivial Painlevé examples of Joyce structures, complementing the earlier Painlevé I case. The computed tau-function restrictions and the connection to Painlevé tau functions, and the proposed relation to Nekrasov-Shatashvili free energies, are potentially of substantial interest for the DT-theory and topological-string interpretations of Joyce structures. The authors give detailed derivations of the isomonodromic flows, period computations via Riemann bilinear relations, and independent checks of the θ→0 limit, which are strengths of the paper. However, the stated regularity functions S in the main theorems are inconsistent with the paper's own expansions, and the tau-function identification is not fully pinned down by the manuscript as written.

major comments (2)
  1. [§8.2-§8.4, Theorems 3.1(iv) and 3.2(iv)] The stated S is inconsistent with the expansion derived in the proof. Substituting (141) into (129) gives (142), W = (2t v - H w)/(12(H²-4t)) + O(3), with v=θ_s and w=θ_H at leading order. Hence ∂W/∂θ_s|0 = t/(6(H²-4t)) and ∂W/∂θ_H|0 = -H/(12(H²-4t)). This closed 1-form integrates to S = -1/24 log(H²-4t) + const, not S = log(H²-4t) - 1/24. The derivatives of the stated S are -4/(H²-4t) and 2H/(H²-4t), which do not match (142). The same problem occurs in §7.7: (231) gives ∂W/∂θ_t|0 = t/(24(8H-t²)) and ∂W/∂θ_H|0 = (t²-12H)/(24H(8H-t²)), which integrate to S = -1/48 log(H²(8H-t²)) + const, not the stated S = log(H²(8H-t²)) - 1/48. Therefore Theorems 3.1(ii), 3.2(ii), 6.9(ii) and 7.9(ii), as well as the general claim (22) in §3.2, are incorrect as stated. This is not a harmless convention issue, because S is used in Remark 8.1 and §8.5 to identify the θ=0 behaviour with the NS free energy; the stated logarithmic vs negative-logarithmic dependence changes that identification materially.
  2. [§8.2-8.4] The tau-function comparison is not fully specified. The paper chooses a primitive Θ_ε = ω12 x1 dx2 using a 'canonical system of logarithmic Fock-Goncharov coordinates (x1,x2)', but no unique coordinate system is defined. Different choices of (x1,x2) for the same symplectic form change the primitive by a term that is not necessarily exact, so the expression d log(τ|Y#) = ... + (1/4πi)x1dx2 (respectively (1/2πi)x1dx2) is only meaningful once a particular coordinate system is fixed. The identity with the classical action differential and with the Its-Lisovyy-Prokhorov tau normalization therefore depends on an unspecified choice. The authors should either specify the Fock-Goncharov coordinate system explicitly, or state clearly that the equality holds only up to the exact-form ambiguity and explain why the Painlevé tau identification is insensitive to it.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§6.9] In the paragraph preceding Theorem 6.9, the text uses θ_t in equation (138) although the local coordinate introduced earlier is s = log t with corresponding coordinate θ_s; please make the notation consistent.
  2. [Theorem 3.2(iv)] The reference to 'the connection (28)' in Theorem 3.2(iv) should presumably be to connection (37), as in the Painlevé II case.
  3. [§7.8] There are typographical errors in the closing paragraph: 'compuation' and 'arouns s = 1/2' should be 'computation' and 'around s = 1/2'.
  4. [§3.2] The word 'addtion' in the sentence 'well-defined up to the addtion of a constant' should be spelled 'addition'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Plebański functions are derived from independently computed isomonodromic flows, and the tau-function matching is externally benchmarked.

full rationale

The central Plebański-function formulas (Theorems 3.1(i) and 3.2(i)) are not fitted to the claimed outputs. They are obtained by computing the extended isomonodromic flows (Propositions 6.1 and 7.2), changing to period coordinates via Riemann bilinear relations, and comparing fourth θ-derivatives of the flow-generating function K with the displayed rational expressions (Theorems 6.8 and 7.7). The function S is then defined from W by Eq. (21), so the stated regularity results are consequences of W, not inputs to it. The only potentially load-bearing self-citations are [17, Prop. 4.2], a proven general variable-change lemma, and [15], which supplies the tau-function definition and a conjectural uniqueness statement. The paper explicitly declines to rely on the latter: 'It is conjectured in [15, Section 4] ... In this paper we will construct the required Joyce structures in our two examples by direct calculation.' The tau-function identification is checked against the independent Its–Lisovyy–Prokhorov normalization [42] and the classical action differential [43]; the residual freedom in choosing Fock–Goncharov coordinates and setting Θ∞=0 (Section 8.2) is an under-specification or normalization choice, not a circular reduction. The skeptic's reported mismatch between the expansions (142)/(231) and the constants in Theorems 3.1(ii)/3.2(ii) is a mathematical correctness issue, not a circularity, and does not indicate that W was derived from S.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No truly new entities are introduced. The free parameter is a discrete choice of monodromy sign. The axioms are background mathematical facts plus two explicitly flagged conjectural/experimental ingredients: the general Joyce-structure construction for meromorphic differentials and the tau-function normalization.

free parameters (1)
  • choice of exponential holonomy e^{θ_ν} at the infinite point (Painlevé II) = -1 (equivalently s=0)
    In Remark 4.1 and Section 7.6 the authors choose θ3=πi among the two allowed values in {±1}. This selects one of two possible Joyce structures and is needed for Theorem 3.2; the alternative choice would give S = -1/24 log(H(8H-t^2)^2) as noted at the end of Section 7.8.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Rigorous construction of Joyce structures on spaces of meromorphic quadratic differentials with poles exists (cited as forthcoming [58]); the present paper uses a conjectural sketch from [15, Section 4].
    Section 4, paragraph 1: 'The rigorous construction in the meromorphic case will appear in [58]. In this section we give a sketch of a general but conjectural approach.' Although the two examples are checked by direct computation, the interpretation as class S[A1] Joyce structures rests on this background.
  • domain assumption Uniqueness of the second-order operator (49) with apparent singularities at q_i and periods (54) fixed (conjectured in [15, Section 4]).
    Section 4: 'It is conjectured in [15, Section 4] that for a generic point of X# ... there is a unique equation (49)'. The paper bypasses this by explicit calculation, but the coordinate change (z_i, θ_j) as canonical coordinates on X# presupposes such a unique lift.
  • ad hoc to paper Tau function is well-defined only after choosing symplectic potentials; the paper fixes Θ∞=0 on r=0 and uses logarithmic Fock-Goncharov coordinates without specifying them uniquely.
    Section 8.1: 'This definition is of course vacuous without some procedure for defining the symplectic potentials'; Section 8.2(iii): 'we can simply take Θ∞=0'. The matching with ILP depends on this unspecified choice.
  • standard math Standard facts: Riemann bilinear relations for meromorphic differentials, Weierstrass uniformization, abelian Riemann-Hilbert correspondence.
    Used in Lemmas 6.4, 6.6, 7.4 and Sections 6.9, 7.7; these are classical and generally accepted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Joyce structures and poles of Painlev\'e equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EE2BWJ37

@misc{pith2026250503429,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Joyce structures and poles of Painlev\'e equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EE2BWJ37}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03429}
}
abstract

Joyce structures are a class of geometric structures that first arose in relation to Donaldson-Thomas theory. There is a special class of examples, called class $S[A_1]$, whose underlying manifold parameterises Riemann surfaces of some fixed genus equipped with a meromorphic quadratic differential with poles of fixed orders. We study two Joyce structures of this type using the isomonodromic systems associated to the Painlev\'e II and III$_3$ equations. We give explicit formulae for the Pleba\'nski functions of these Joyce structures, and compute several associated objects, including their tau functions, which we explicitly relate to the corresponding Painlev\'e tau functions. We show that the behaviour of the Joyce structure near the zero-section can be studied analytically through poles of Painlev\'e equations. The systematic treatment gives a blueprint for the study of more general Joyce structures associated to meromorphic quadratic differentials on the Riemann sphere.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    Bridgeland, Tau Functions from Joyce Structures , SIGMA 20 (2024) 112

    T. Bridgeland, Tau Functions from Joyce Structures , SIGMA 20 (2024) 112

    work page 2024

  2. [58]

    Zikidis, Joyce structures from meromorphic quadratic differentials , To appear (2025)

    M. Zikidis, Joyce structures from meromorphic quadratic differentials , To appear (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [1]

    Alexandrov and B

    S. Alexandrov and B. Pioline, Heavenly metrics, BPS indices and twistors , Lett. Math. Phys. 111 (2021) Paper No. 116, 41

    work page 2021

  4. [2]

    Alexandrov and B

    S. Alexandrov and B. Pioline, Conformal TBA for resolved conifolds , Ann. Henri Poincar´ e23 (2022) 1909

    work page 2022

  5. [3]

    D. G. L. Allegretti and T. Bridgeland, The monodromy of meromorphic projective structures , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373 (2020) 6321

    work page 2020

  6. [4]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes , Commun. Math. Phys. 165 (1994) 311

    work page 1994

  7. [5]

    Bershtein, P

    M. Bershtein, P. Gavrylenko and A. Grassi, Quantum Spectral Problems and Isomonodromic Deformations , Commun. Math. Phys. 393 (2022) 347

    work page 2022

  8. [6]

    Bertola, J

    M. Bertola, J. Harnad and J. Hurtubise, Hamiltonian structure of rational isomonodromic deformat ion systems, J. Math. Phys. 64 (2023) 083502

    work page 2023

Show all 58 references
  1. [7]

    Bertola, Riemann surfaces and theta functions (lecture notes, Conco rdia University) , 2006

    M. Bertola, Riemann surfaces and theta functions (lecture notes, Conco rdia University) , 2006

    2006

  2. [8]

    Bonelli, P

    G. Bonelli, P. Gavrylenko, I. Majtara and A. Tanzini, Surface observables in gauge theories, modular Painlev´ e tau functions and non-perturbative topological strings, 2410.17868

    arXiv

  3. [9]

    Bonelli, A

    G. Bonelli, A. Grassi and A. Tanzini, Seiberg–Witten theory as a Fermi gas , Lett. Math. Phys. 107 (2017) 1. JOYCE STRUCTURES AND POLES OF PAINLEV ´E EQUATIONS 47

    2017

  4. [10]

    Bonelli, O

    G. Bonelli, O. Lisovyy, K. Maruyoshi, A. Sciarappa and A. Tanzini, On Painlev´ e/gauge theory correspondence, Lett. Math. Phys. 107 (2017) 2359

    2017

  5. [11]

    Bridgeland, Stability conditions on triangulated categories , Ann

    T. Bridgeland, Stability conditions on triangulated categories , Ann. of Math. (2) 166 (2007) 317

    2007

  6. [12]

    Bridgeland, Spaces of stability conditions , in Algebraic geometry—Seattle 2005

    T. Bridgeland, Spaces of stability conditions , in Algebraic geometry—Seattle 2005. Part 1 , vol. 80, Part 1 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , pp. 1–21. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2009. DOI

    2005

  7. [13]

    Bridgeland, Geometry from Donaldson-Thomas invariants , in Integrability, quantization, and geometry II

    T. Bridgeland, Geometry from Donaldson-Thomas invariants , in Integrability, quantization, and geometry II. Quantum theories and algebraic geometry , vol. 103.2 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , pp. 1–66. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2021. DOI

    2021

  8. [14]

    Bridgeland, Joyce structures on spaces of quadratic differentials , 2203.17148

    T. Bridgeland, Joyce structures on spaces of quadratic differentials , 2203.17148

    arXiv

  9. [16]

    Bridgeland, Joyce structures and their twistor spaces , Adv

    T. Bridgeland, Joyce structures and their twistor spaces , Adv. Math. 462 (2025) 110089

    2025

  10. [17]

    Bridgeland and D

    T. Bridgeland and D. Masoero, On the monodromy of the deformed cubic oscillator , Math. Ann. 385 (2023) 193

    2023

  11. [18]

    Bridgeland and I

    T. Bridgeland and I. Smith, Quadratic differentials as stability conditions , Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. 121 (2015) 155

    2015

  12. [19]

    Bridgeland and I

    T. Bridgeland and I. A. B. Strachan, Complex hyperk¨ ahler structures defined by Donaldson-Thomas invariants, Lett. Math. Phys. 111 (2021) Paper No. 54, 24

    2021

  13. [20]

    Cafasso, P

    M. Cafasso, P. Gavrylenko and O. Lisovyy, Tau functions as Widom constants , Commun. Math. Phys. 365 (2019) 741

    2019

  14. [21]

    L. O. Chekhov, M. Mazzocco and V. N. Rubtsov, Painlev´ e monodromy manifolds, decorated character varieties, and cluster algebras , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2017) 7639

    2017

  15. [22]

    Coman, P

    I. Coman, P. Longhi and J. Teschner, From quantum curves to topological string partition functi ons II , 2004.04585

    2004 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Coman, E

    I. Coman, E. Pomoni and J. Teschner, From Quantum Curves to Topological String Partition Functi ons, Commun. Math. Phys. 399 (2023) 1501

    2023

  17. [24]

    Del Monte, H

    F. Del Monte, H. Desiraju and P. Gavrylenko, Isomonodromic tau functions on a torus as Fredholm determinants, and charged partitions , Commun. Math. Phys. 398 (2023) 1029

    2023

  18. [25]

    Del Monte, H

    F. Del Monte, H. Desiraju and P. Gavrylenko, Monodromy dependence and symplectic geometry of isomonodromic tau functions on the torus , J. Phys. A 56 (2023) 294002

    2023

  19. [26]

    Desiraju, Fredholm determinant representation of the homogeneous Pa inlev´ e IIτ-function, Nonlinearity 34 (2021) 6507

    H. Desiraju, Fredholm determinant representation of the homogeneous Pa inlev´ e IIτ-function, Nonlinearity 34 (2021) 6507

    2021

  20. [27]

    Dubrovin, Geometry of 2d topological field theories , in Integrable systems and quantum groups (Montecatini Terme, 1993) , vol

    B. Dubrovin, Geometry of 2d topological field theories , in Integrable systems and quantum groups (Montecatini Terme, 1993) , vol. 1620 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pp. 120–348. Springer, Berlin, 1996. DOI

    1993

  21. [28]

    Dubrovin, Painlev´ e transcendents in two-dimensional topological field theory, in The Painlev´ e property, CRM Ser

    B. Dubrovin, Painlev´ e transcendents in two-dimensional topological field theory, in The Painlev´ e property, CRM Ser. Math. Phys., pp. 287–412. Springer, New York, 1999. 48 TOM BRIDGELAND AND F ABRIZIO DEL MONTE

    1999

  22. [29]

    Dunajski, Null K¨ ahler geometry and isomonodromic deformations, Comm

    M. Dunajski, Null K¨ ahler geometry and isomonodromic deformations, Comm. Math. Phys. 391 (2022) 77

    2022

  23. [30]

    Dunajski and L

    M. Dunajski and L. J. Mason, Hyper-K¨ ahler hierarchies and their twistor theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 213 (2000) 641

    2000

  24. [31]

    Dunajski and T

    M. Dunajski and T. Moy, Heavenly metrics, hyper-Lagrangians and Joyce structures , J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 110 (2024) Paper No. e13009

    2024

  25. [32]

    Eguchi and H

    T. Eguchi and H. Kanno, Topological strings and Nekrasov’s formulas , JHEP 12 (2003) 006

    2003

  26. [33]

    H. M. Farkas, I. Kra, H. M. Farkas and I. Kra, Riemann surfaces. Springer, 1992

    1992

  27. [34]

    A. S. Fokas, A. R. Its, A. A. Kapaev and V. Y. Novokshenov, Painlev´ e transcendents: the Riemann-Hilbert approach, vol. 128. American Mathematical Society, 2006

    2006

  28. [35]

    Gamayun, N

    O. Gamayun, N. Iorgov and O. Lisovyy, Conformal field theory of Painlev´ e VI , JHEP 10 (2012) 038

    2012

  29. [36]

    Gavrylenko, N

    P. Gavrylenko, N. Iorgov and O. Lisovyy, On solutions of the Fuji-Suzuki-Tsuda system , SIGMA 14 (2018) 123

    2018

  30. [37]

    Gavrylenko and O

    P. Gavrylenko and O. Lisovyy, Fredholm Determinant and Nekrasov Sum Representations of I somonodromic Tau Functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 363 (2018) 1

    2018

  31. [38]

    Gavrylenko and O

    P. Gavrylenko and O. Lisovyy, Pure SU(2) gauge theory partition function and generalized Bessel kernel. , Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 18 (2018) 181

    2018

  32. [39]

    Grassi, Y

    A. Grassi, Y. Hatsuda and M. Marino, Topological strings from quantum mechanics , Ann. Henri Poincar´ e17 (2016) 3177

    2016

  33. [40]

    Haiden, 3-D Calabi-Yau categories for Teichm¨ uller theory, Duke Math

    F. Haiden, 3-D Calabi-Yau categories for Teichm¨ uller theory, Duke Math. J. 173 (2024) 277

    2024

  34. [41]

    Huang, A.-K

    M.-X. Huang, A.-K. Kashani-Poor and A. Klemm, The Ω deformed B-model for rigid N = 2 theories, Annales Henri Poincare 14 (2013) 425

    2013

  35. [42]

    A. Its, O. Lisovyy and A. Prokhorov, Monodromy dependence and connection formulae for isomonod romic tau functions , Duke Math. J. 167 (2018) 1347

    2018

  36. [43]

    A. R. Its and A. Prokhorov, On some Hamiltonian properties of the isomonodromic tau fun ctions, Rev. Math. Phys. 30 (2018) 1840008

    2018

  37. [44]

    Jimbo and T

    M. Jimbo and T. Miwa, Monodromy perserving deformation of linear ordinary differ ential equations with rational coefficients. ii , Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 2 (1981) 407

    1981

  38. [45]

    Joyce, Holomorphic generating functions for invariants counting coherent sheaves on Calabi-Yau 3-folds , Geom

    D. Joyce, Holomorphic generating functions for invariants counting coherent sheaves on Calabi-Yau 3-folds , Geom. Topol. 11 (2007) 667

    2007

  39. [46]

    Joyce and Y

    D. Joyce and Y. Song, A theory of generalized Donaldson-Thomas invariants , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 217 (2012) iv+199

    2012

  40. [47]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invarian ts and cluster transformations, 0811.2435. JOYCE STRUCTURES AND POLES OF PAINLEV ´E EQUATIONS 49

    arXiv

  41. [48]

    Korotkin, Bergman tau-function: from Einstein equations and Dubrovi n-Frobenius manifolds to geometry of moduli spaces , p

    D. Korotkin, Bergman tau-function: from Einstein equations and Dubrovi n-Frobenius manifolds to geometry of moduli spaces , p. 215–287. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, 2020

    2020

  42. [49]

    Krichever, Isomonodromy equations on algebraic curves, canonical tra nsformations and Whitham equations, Mosc

    I. Krichever, Isomonodromy equations on algebraic curves, canonical tra nsformations and Whitham equations, Mosc. Math. J. 2 (2002) 717

    2002

  43. [50]

    A. M. Levin and M. A. Olshanetsky, Hierarchies of isomonodromic deformations and Hitchin sys tems, in Moscow Seminar in Mathematical Physics , vol. 191 of Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2 , pp. 223–262. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999. DOI

    1999

  44. [51]

    Nekrasov and A

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov, Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions , Prog. Math. 244 (2006) 525

    2006

  45. [52]

    J. F. Pleba´ nski, Some solutions of complex Einstein equations , J. Mathematical Phys. 16 (1975) 2395

    1975

  46. [53]

    Reyman and M

    A. Reyman and M. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Reduction of Hamiltonian systems, affine Lie algebras and Lax equations, Inventiones mathematicae 54 (1979) 81

    1979

  47. [54]

    Reyman and M

    A. Reyman and M. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Compatible poisson structures for lax equations: an r-matr ix approach, Physics Letters A 130 (1988) 456

    1988

  48. [55]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and co nfinement in N = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory , Nuclear Phys. B 426 (1994) 19

    1994

  49. [56]

    Taki, Refined Topological Vertex and Instanton Counting , JHEP 03 (2008) 048

    M. Taki, Refined Topological Vertex and Instanton Counting , JHEP 03 (2008) 048

    2008

  50. [57]

    van der Put and M.-H

    M. van der Put and M.-H. Saito, Moduli spaces for linear differential equations and the Pain lev´ e equations, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 59 (2009) 2611

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.