Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

OSUniverse: Benchmark for Multimodal GUI-navigation AI Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.03570 v1 pith:LYWOBDGV submitted 2025-05-06 cs.AI

OSUniverse: Benchmark for Multimodal GUI-navigation AI Agents

classification cs.AI
keywords benchmarkagentsautomatedgui-navigationosuniversetasksaveragecases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce OSUniverse: a benchmark of complex, multimodal desktop-oriented tasks for advanced GUI-navigation AI agents that focuses on ease of use, extensibility, comprehensive coverage of test cases, and automated validation. We divide the tasks in increasing levels of complexity, from basic precision clicking to multistep, multiapplication tests requiring dexterity, precision, and clear thinking from the agent. In version one of the benchmark, presented here, we have calibrated the complexity of the benchmark test cases to ensure that the SOTA (State of the Art) agents (at the time of publication) do not achieve results higher than 50%, while the average white collar worker can perform all these tasks with perfect accuracy. The benchmark can be scored manually, but we also introduce an automated validation mechanism that has an average error rate less than 2%. Therefore, this benchmark presents solid ground for fully automated measuring of progress, capabilities and the effectiveness of GUI-navigation AI agents over the short and medium-term horizon. The source code of the benchmark is available at https://github.com/agentsea/osuniverse.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. WindowsWorld: A Process-Centric Benchmark of Autonomous GUI Agents in Professional Cross-Application Environments

    cs.AI 2026-04 accept novelty 8.0

    WindowsWorld benchmark shows leading GUI agents achieve under 21% success on multi-application professional tasks, with failures especially on conditional judgment across three or more apps and inefficient execution.

  2. GUIGuard-Bench: Toward a General Evaluation for Privacy-Preserving GUI Agents

    cs.CR 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    GUIGuard-Bench is a new benchmark with annotated GUI screenshots that measures privacy recognition, planning fidelity under protection, and utility impact for trajectory-based GUI agents.

  3. TUA-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Terminal-Use Agents

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TUA-Bench provides 120 manually designed terminal tasks across five families with execution-based scoring; the top agent reaches 65.8% success.

  4. OmegaUse-OfficeVal: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Office-Suite Tasks with Economic Grounding

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    On 100 long-horizon office-suite tasks with task-level economic labels and code verifiers, frontier LLMs are cheaper and faster than humans but lag substantially in deliverable quality.

  5. GUICrafter: Weakly-Supervised GUI Agent Leveraging Massive Unannotated Screenshots

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GUICrafter uses curriculum learning on unannotated GUI screenshots for visual grounding followed by RL calibration on limited labels to match or exceed prior GUI agents with far less annotation.