Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Traveling-Wave Parametric Amplifier with Passive Reverse Isolation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports a three-stage traveling-wave parametric amplifier that combines 20 dB forward gain over a 1.6 GHz band with more than 35 dB of passive reverse isolation, at a noise level 1.7 times the quantum limit.

desk verdict A genuinely new TWPA architecture with credible gain and noise measurements, but the 'passive' isolation claim needs qualification: pump-on degrades S12 from >50 to 35 dB, and the mechanism is left unanalyzed. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04059 v1 pith:ZVSTTLYU submitted 2025-05-07 quant-ph cond-mat.supr-con

C. S. Kow , M. T. Bell This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.supr-con
keywords traveling-waveparametricamplifierreverseisolationreflectionlessfilterfour-wavemixingJosephsonjunctionSQUIDtransmissionlinequantum-limitednoisesuperconductingmicrowave
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a traveling-wave parametric amplifier can protect a sensitive quantum device from backward-propagating noise without relying on bulky cryogenic isolators. The route is a three-stage design in which a reflectionless high-pass filter sits between two parametric gain stages, blocking the signal frequency in both directions while letting the pump and idler pass from the first stage to the third. The prototype delivers 20 dB of forward gain across a 1.6 GHz band, more than 35 dB of reverse isolation with the pump on, and input noise of 1.7 photons, near the one-photon quantum limit. If the approach is right, quantum readout chains can drop some isolators, removing their insertion loss and magnetic footprint while keeping the first amplifier nearly quantum limited.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the reflectionless high-pass filter placed between the two parametric gain stages. The filter is built from two quadrature hybrids and two balanced high-pass filter branches, so stop-band reflections cancel at the input and are dissipated in a terminated isolation port; this keeps both gain stages matched to 50 $\Omega$ across the pass- and stop-bands and prevents standing waves from disturbing four-wave mixing. The gain stages are flux-tunable nonlinear transmission lines made of coupled asymmetric SQUIDs; the inverse phase-matching technique uses the pump-induced nonlinear phase shift to cancel the chromatic phase mismatch, satisfying $2k_p - k_s - k_i = 0$ and producing gain lobes displaced from the pump frequency. For signals in the filter stop-band the total gain is $G_s = \kappa_s^2 \kappa_i^2 \sinh^4(gl)/g^4$, the product of signal-to-idler conversion in the first stage and idler-to-signal reconversion in the third.

What would settle it

Measure the reverse transmission of the mTWPA as a function of pump power from $-85$ dBm to $-70$ dBm at the two phase-matched gain frequencies; if the pump-on isolation falls by substantially more than the observed 15 dB or approaches the forward gain level at the intended operating point, then reverse parametric conversion materially erodes the passive-isolation claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that passive in-band isolation and broadband parametric gain can coexist in one amplifier by separating the two jobs into different stages. In the first stage, four-wave mixing converts the forward signal at $\omega_s$ into an idler at $\omega_i = 2\omega_p - \omega_s$; the signal frequency lies in the stop-band of the reflectionless high-pass filter, so the original signal is absorbed in internal loads, while the idler and pump propagate into the third stage. There the idler is reconverted to the signal by a second four-wave-mixing process, recovering and amplifying the input at the output. For backward-propagating waves at the signal frequency, the filter stop-band provides the isolation, and the measured forward path remains near quantum limited: 20 dB gain over 1.6 GHz, reverse isolation greater than 35 dB, and noise of 1.7 times the quantum limit.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that backward-propagating signals at the signal frequency are not parametrically amplified or converted by the forward pump, so the reflectionless filter alone sets the isolation; the measured drop from more than 50 dB isolation with the pump off to 35 dB with the pump on shows that a reverse parametric process is active, and the paper leaves its analysis to future work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A cryogenic readout chain can operate without an isolator between the mTWPA and a HEMT amplifier, because forward gain at 5.2 GHz only compresses by 1 dB for reverse power as high as $-76$ dBm, above the noise power of typical HEMT stages.
  • Removing even one cryogenic isolator removes its insertion loss and its magnetic footprint, so the same readout chain becomes more compact and potentially more quantum efficient.
  • The measured noise of 1.7 photons shows that inserting a reflectionless filter between two gain stages does not undo near-quantum-limited operation, so isolation can be bought without a significant noise penalty.
  • For signal frequencies below the filter cutoff, amplification proceeds through signal-to-idler and idler-to-signal conversion, so the device acts simultaneously as an amplifier and a frequency converter, and its gain formula provides a direct design tool for splitting gain between the stages.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims, the 15 dB drop in isolation between pump-off and pump-on indicates that a phase-mismatched reverse parametric process is active; a practical consequence is that the isolation specification is pump-power dependent and should be re-measured at every operating point.
  • Beyond the paper's claims, the same three-stage architecture could be transferred to three-wave-mixing parametric amplifiers or other nonlinear media, since the filter only needs to separate the signal band from the pump and idler bands.
  • Beyond the paper's claims, the reflectionless filter should also suppress gain ripple from impedance mismatches in any cascaded amplifier, because stop-band energy is absorbed rather than reflected; this could be tested by inserting the same filter into a conventional amplifier chain.
  • Beyond the paper's claims, a direct qubit-readout comparison between an mTWPA chain and a conventional isolator chain would test whether the amplifier-level noise and isolation results translate into higher readout fidelity; the paper does not report such an end-to-end measurement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a multi-stage traveling-wave parametric amplifier (mTWPA) in which two nonlinear SQUID-based parametric stages are separated by a passive reflectionless high-pass filter. A forward signal below the filter cutoff is converted to an idler in the first stage, the idler passes through the filter, and the third stage converts it back to an amplified signal; backward-propagating signals at the signal frequency are blocked by the filter. The authors report experimental forward gain of 20 dB over 1.6 GHz, reverse isolation greater than 35 dB, and noise at 1.7 times the quantum limit, supported by S-parameter and Y-factor measurements, WRSpice simulations, and a coupled-mode theory taken from prior work. The paper also discusses design optimizations that would move gain from the first to the third stage to improve return loss and input-referred noise.

Significance. If the reported performance holds, the mTWPA is a significant step toward replacing cryogenic ferrite isolators in cQED readout chains: it combines broadband gain with in-band reverse isolation in a passive filter element, and the measured 1.7-photon noise shows that the additional filter stage does not destroy near-quantum-limited performance. The manuscript is also commendable for presenting direct measurements with thru-line referencing and calibrated noise sources, for comparing theory and WRSpice against data rather than fitting the headline quantities, and for explicitly identifying the measured isolation, gain, and noise as the central evidence. The architecture is conceptually clear and the proposed gain redistribution for lower input noise is a useful falsifiable design prediction. The main uncertainty concerns the pump-dependent component of the reverse isolation, which is left unmodeled and is directly relevant to the central isolation claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 5(d)] The central claim of passive in-band reverse isolation is not fully supported by the pump-on data. Figure 5(d) shows that S12 degrades by about 20 dB as Pp approaches the optimal value of -75 dBm, reducing isolation from greater than 50 dB (pump off) to 35 dB (pump on). The text attributes this to 'inefficient parametric processes' and states that a detailed analysis is beyond the scope of the work. Because the headline isolation is measured at a single carefully chosen pump power and the responsible reverse process is uncharacterized, the isolation is not demonstrated to be a passive property of the filter alone; it is a property of the filter plus a pump-dependent leakage mechanism that could scale with pump power, flux bias, or gain re-optimization. The authors should either provide a model or measurement bounding the scaling of this reverse parametric process, or qualify the isolation claim as operating-point-dependent.
  2. [Sec. III, paragraph on S12 and reverse parametric processes] The statement that a counter-propagating reverse signal experiences 'significant phase mismatch in the 4WM process minimizing the effects of reverse parametric processes' is contradicted by the measured pump-induced degradation in Fig. 5(d) and by the peaks in S12(ωr) above the pump-off baseline in Fig. 5(a). The phase-mismatch argument is used to justify that isolation is set by the reflectionless filter, but the data show that a non-negligible reverse parametric process is active at the operating point. A quantitative estimate of the phase mismatch for the reverse process, or a measurement isolating its frequency and pump-power dependence, is needed to support the claim that the filter dominates the pump-on isolation.
  3. [Sec. IV, Fig. 8(b) and Appendix A] The explanation for the measured input noise of 1.3 photons without isolators relies on estimated rather than measured quantities: a 15 dB return loss at the first-stage/reflectionless-filter interface and a 10 dB first-stage gain, with a WRSpice simulation that explicitly omits transmission-line loss noise. This is a secondary point because the headline 1.7-photon noise in Fig. 7(a) is obtained from the more direct SNR-improvement method with a calibrated HEMT chain. Still, the unquantified contributions from interface reflections and loss mean the 'no isolators' input-noise demonstration is more suggestive than definitive; the authors should state clearly which elements of that estimate are measured and which are assumed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. I] The term 'passive reverse isolation' is used throughout, but the measured isolation depends on pump power. The abstract and introduction should clarify that the filter provides passive isolation in the pump-off state and that pump-on isolation includes a small, unmodeled parametric leakage.
  2. [Fig. 4(a) and Sec. III] The color references in the text for S12 (red line pump on, green line pump off) are consistent with the caption, but the same panel uses blue/orange for two different S21 traces; the colors are hard to distinguish in grayscale. Consider using distinct line styles as well.
  3. [Eqs. (8)-(11)] The notation l is used both for the length of each parametric stage and for the total propagation variable; Eq. (11) uses l after stating each stage length is l=350a. Please define whether the gain expressions refer to a single stage or both stages, and use separate symbols for stage length and total length.
  4. [Sec. IV] There are typographical errors, including 'addiditive' for 'additive' and 'propogate' for 'propagate'; these should be corrected before publication.
  5. [Appendix E] The WRSpice reflectionless filter uses a lumped-element Morgan topology rather than the experimental Lange-coupler plus LTCC filter; the text mentions this but does not discuss how the difference in filter response might affect the simulated gain compared with the measured device. A sentence addressing the fidelity of the filter model would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the headline gain, isolation, and noise results are direct measurements referenced to thru-line and calibrated noise sources, not outputs of fitted models.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental benchmarks. Forward gain S21 is measured with a VNA referenced against a switchable thru-line (Sec. III, Fig. 4(a)); reverse isolation is measured directly as S12 with pump on and off (Fig. 4(a), Fig. 5(d)); noise is obtained by Y-factor calibration of HEMT chains and the SNR-improvement method with calibrated thermal noise sources (Sec. IV, Appendix F). The theoretical gain expressions, Eqs. 8-11, are standard coupled-mode solutions [6,33,34] adapted to the asymmetric-SQUID line from prior published work [26,28]; they are compared with, not fitted to, the measured gain, and the operating points (pump power and flux) are selected rather than extracted from the target data. The self-citations to inverse-Kerr phase matching [26-28] are design antecedents, not the evidence for the headline results, so they are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The only in-scope limitation passage is in Sec. III: 'A detailed analysis of these parametric processes which contribute to the decrease in the reverse isolation of the mTWPA is beyond the scope of this work.' This is an acknowledged gap in the explanation of the pump-on isolation drop, but it is not a circular step: the isolation value is still directly measured, and the claim is not derived from the unanalyzed process.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the mTWPA combines established components (asymmetric SQUID transmission lines, quadrature hybrids, LTCC high-pass filters). Central claims are measured, not derived from fitted parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • Pump power Pp = -75 ± 1 dBm
    Chosen operating point that maximizes forward gain and keeps input noise near 1.7 photons. It is a laboratory bias setting, not a parameter fitted to the model.
  • Magnetic flux bias Φ/Φ0 = 0.48 applied; stage biases 0.41 and 0.52
    Selected to tune the Kerr nonlinearity γ and the stage impedances; an operating condition, not a fitted model parameter.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Four-wave mixing coupled-mode equations (Eqs. 3-10) describe the SQUID transmission line.
    Taken from prior asymmetric-SQUID TWPA literature (refs. 6, 26, 28); the gain predictions rely on this model.
  • domain assumption Inverse Kerr phase matching achieves κ ≈ 0 at frequencies displaced from the pump.
    Used to position the gain lobe away from the filter cutoff; established in prior work by Zhang et al. and Bell and Samolov.
  • domain assumption The reflectionless high-pass filter absorbs stop-band signals without reflecting them.
    Morgan filter design; supported by room-temperature S21 and S11 measurements in Fig. 2.
  • domain assumption Backward-propagating signals at ωs experience negligible phase-matched parametric conversion.
    Assumption stated in Sec. III and V; measured pump-on isolation of 35 dB shows this is only partially true, making it the weakest assumption.
  • standard math Y-factor and SNR-improvement noise analysis correctly separate mTWPA noise from HEMT noise.
    Standard cryogenic noise measurement practice; described in Sec. IV and Appendix F.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Traveling-Wave Parametric Amplifier with Passive Reverse Isolation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZVSTTLYU

@misc{pith2026250504059,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Traveling-Wave Parametric Amplifier with Passive Reverse Isolation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZVSTTLYU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04059}
}
read the original abstract

Traveling-wave parametric amplifiers (TWPAs) have attracted much attention for their broadband amplification and near-quantum-limited noise performance. TWPAs are non-reciprocal by nature providing gain for forward-propagating signals and transmission line losses for backward traveling waves. This intrinsic non-reciprocity is insufficient to protect sensitive quantum devices from back-action due to noise from warmer amplification stages in practical systems, and thus necessitates the need for bulky cryogenic isolators. We present a multi-stage Traveling-Wave Parametric Amplifier (mTWPA) that addresses this limitation by achieving passive in-band reverse isolation alongside near-quantum-limited noise performance. The multi-stage architecture consists of two, mode conversion stages and a reflectionless high-pass filter which provides the passive isolation. Experimental measurements of a prototype mTWPA demonstrated 20 dB of forward gain across a 1.6 GHz bandwidth and greater than 35 dB of reverse isolation. Noise measurements indicate performance at 1.7 times the quantum limit. This demonstrates that the increased complexity of a multi-stage TWPA design does not lead to significant added noise. The designed distribution of gain across the stages is engineered to minimize internal amplifier noise at the input, and we propose further optimization strategies in redistribution of the gain between the stages. This level of isolation effectively mitigates noise from warmer amplification stages, matching the performance of conventional isolators. The mTWPA approach offers a scalable path forward for more efficient and compact quantum circuit readout systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04059 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Signal propagation in mTWPA. (a) Transfer functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Balanced high-pass reflectionless filter implemente [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (b) presents S21 of the mTWPA for Φ/Φ0 = 0 (orange line) and Φ/Φ0 = 0.48 (blue line). The high￾pass response in transmission is attributed to the reflec￾tionless filter. Just above ωf , the frequency where ωp is positioned the insertion loss was measured to be 3 dB. The isolation level in the stop-band was limited by the noise floor of the VNA for this measurement. A standing wave pattern in the pass-band was observ… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Measured nonreciprocal operation of the mTWPA. (a) Fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) mTWPA region of bandwidth where forward sig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. mTWPA return loss [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Noise measurement of mTWPA performed with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Noise and gain measurement of mTWPA performed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reflection-less filter for superconducting quantum circuits

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A compact superconducting reflection-less band-pass filter for quantum circuits achieves low loss, wideband absorption of reflections, and suppresses thermal photons from its termination resistors, verified with a qubit.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    6 GHz bandwidth. This level of isolation is compa- rable to commercial double-junction cryogenic isolators [44, 45], which are commonly used to attenuate noise from the HEMT amplifier stage in standard circuit QED cryogenic measurement setups. II. mTWP A DESIGN In the mTWPA design, the first and third paramet- ric stages, Figure 1(b) employ an inverse Kerr ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    4 GHz, and Pp = −75 dBm which are shown in Figure 5

    48, ω p/ 2π = 7 . 4 GHz, and Pp = −75 dBm which are shown in Figure 5. Figure 5(a) The vertical lines indicate three frequencies ω s, r = 4 . 15 (dotted), 5.35 (dash-dot), and 6.1 GHz (dash) where measurements of the signal gain and isolation of the mTWPA were performed. The forward signal gain of the mTWPA versus signal power Ps is shown in Figure 5(b). ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Fadavi Roudsari, D

    A. Fadavi Roudsari, D. Shiri, H. Renberg Nilsson, G. Tancredi, A. Osman, I.-M. Svensson, M. Kudra, M. Rommel, J. Bylander, V. Shumeiko, and P. Dels- ing, Three-wave mixing traveling-wave parametric am- plifier with periodic variation of the circuit parameters, Applied Physics Letters 122, 052601 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Aumentado, Superconducting parametric amplifiers: The state of the art in josephson parametric amplifiers, IEEE Microwave Magazine 21, 45 (2020)

    J. Aumentado, Superconducting parametric amplifiers: The state of the art in josephson parametric amplifiers, IEEE Microwave Magazine 21, 45 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    2 GHz, measured for reverse propagating signals at 11 FIG. 8. Noise and gain measurement of mTWPA performed without isolation between mTWPA and HEMT A. HEMT B used to directly measure input noise of mTWPA from backward-propagating noise from HEMT A and mTWPA. (a) Forward signal gain at ω s/ 2π = 5. 2 GHz for ω p/ 2π = 7. 4 GHz and Pp = − 75 dBm versus Pre...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Esposito, A

    M. Esposito, A. Ranadive, L. Planat, and N. Roch, Per- spective on traveling wave microwave parametric ampli- fiers, Applied Physics Letters 119, 120501 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Miano and O

    A. Miano and O. A. Mukhanov, Sym- metric traveling wave parametric amplifier, IEEE Trans on Appl Superconductivity 29, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Yaakobi, L

    O. Yaakobi, L. Friedland, C. Macklin, and I. Siddiqi, Parametric amplification in josephson junction embed- ded transmission lines, Phys. Rev. B 87, 144301 (2013)

    2013

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    O’Brien, C

    K. O’Brien, C. Macklin, I. Siddiqi, and X. Zhang, Resonant phase matching of josephson junc- tion traveling wave parametric amplifiers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 157001 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    Macklin, K

    C. Macklin, K. O’Brien, D. Hover, M. E. Schwartz, V. Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. D. Oliver, and I. Siddiqi, A near–quantum-limited josephson traveling-wave para- metric amplifier, Science 350, 307 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    T. C. White, J. Y. Mutus, I.-C. Hoi, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, C. Neill, P. J. J. O’Malley, P. Roushan, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, S. Chaudhuri, J. Gao, and J. M. Marti- nis, Traveling wave par...

    2015

  4. [12]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Or- lando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quan- tum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Applied Physics Reviews 6, 021318 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Ranzani, M

    L. Ranzani, M. Bal, K. C. Fong, G. Ribeill, X. Wu, J. Long, H.-S. Ku, R. P. Erickson, D. Pappas, and T. A. Ohki, Kinetic inductance traveling-wave amplifiers for multiplexed qubit readout, Applied Physics Letters 113, 242602 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Krinner, S

    S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Heinso o, R. Keller, J. L¨ utolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Engineer- ing cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems, EPJ Quantum Technology 6, 2 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Heinsoo, C

    J. Heinsoo, C. K. Andersen, A. Remm, S. Krinner, T. Walter, Y. Salath´ e, S. Gasparinetti, J.-C. Besse, A. Potoˇ cnik, A. Wallraff,et al. , Rapid high-fidelity mul- tiplexed readout of superconducting qubits, Physical Re- view Applied 10, 034040 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Ramanathan, N

    K. Ramanathan, N. Klimovich, R. Basu Thakur, B. H. Eom, H. G. Leduc, S. Shu, A. D. Beyer, and P. K. Day, Wideband direct detection constraints on hidden photon dark matter with the qualiphide experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 231001 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Bartram, T

    C. Bartram, T. Braine, R. Cervantes, N. Crisosto, N. Du, G. Leum, P. Mohapatra, T. Nitta, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, J. Yang, J. Clarke, I. Siddiqi, A. Agrawal, A. V. Dixit, M. H. Awida, A. S. Chou, M. Hollister, S. Knirck, A. Sonnenschein, W. Wester, J. R. Glea- son, A. T. Hi...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Di Vora, A

    R. Di Vora, A. Lombardi, A. Ortolan, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, L. Taffarello, G. Cappelli, N. Crescini, M. Esposito, L. Planat, A. Ranadive, N. Roch, D. Alesini, D. Babusci, A. D’Elia, D. Di Gioacchino, C. Gatti, C. Ligi, G. Maccarrone, A. Rettaroli, S. Tocci,...

    2023

  11. [19]

    Elhomsy, L

    V. Elhomsy, L. Planat, D. J. Niegemann, B. Cardoso- Paz, A. Badreldin, B. Klemt, V. Thiney, R. Lethiecq, E. Eyraud, M. C. Dartiailh, B. Bertrand, H. Niebo- jewski, C. B¨ auerle, M. Vinet, T. Meunier, N. Roch, and M. Urdampilleta, Broadband parametric amplifica- tion for multipl...

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    A. L. Grimsmo and A. Blais, Squeezing and quantum state engineering with josephson travelling wave ampli- fiers, npj Quantum Information 3, 20 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    J. Y. Qiu, A. Grimsmo, K. Peng, B. Kannan, B. Lienhard, Y. Sung, P. Krantz, V. Bolkhovsky, G. Calusine, D. Kim, A. Melville, B. M. Niedziel- ski, J. Yoder, M. E. Schwartz, T. P. Orlando, I. Sid- diqi, S. Gustavsson, K. P. O’Brien, and W. D. Oliver, Broadband squeezed microwave...

    2023

  14. [22]

    Esposito, A

    M. Esposito, A. Ranadive, L. Planat, S. Leger, D. Fraudet, V. Jouanny, O. Buisson, W. Guichard, C. Naud, J. Aumentado, F. Lecocq, and N. Roch, Obser- vation of two-mode squeezing in a traveling wave para- metric amplifier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 153603 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Houde, L

    M. Houde, L. Govia, and A. Clerk, Loss asymme- tries in quantum traveling-wave parametric amplifiers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 034054 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Perelshtein, K

    M. Perelshtein, K. Petrovnin, V. Vesterinen, S. Hamedani Raja, I. Lilja, M. Will, A. Savin, S. Sim- bierowicz, R. Jabdaraghi, J. Lehtinen, L. Gr¨ onberg, J. Hassel, M. Prunnila, J. Govenius, G. Paraoanu, and P. Hakonen, Broadband continuous-variable en- tanglement generation u...

    2022

  17. [25]

    Bockstiegel, J

    C. Bockstiegel, J. Gao, M. R. Vissers, M. Sandberg, S. Chaudhuri, A. Sanders, L. R. Vale, K. D. Irwin, and D. P. Pappas, Development of a broadband nbtin traveling wave parametric amplifier for mkid readout, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 176, 476 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Zobrist, B

    N. Zobrist, B. H. Eom, P. Day, B. A. Mazin, S. R. Meeker, B. Bumble, H. G. LeDuc, G. Coiffard, P. Szypryt, 19 N. Fruitwala, et al. , Wide-band parametric amplifier readout and resolution of optical microwave kinetic in- ductance detectors, Applied Physics Letters 115 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Pozar, Microwave Engineering (Wiley, 2012)

    D. Pozar, Microwave Engineering (Wiley, 2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    Malnou, M

    M. Malnou, M. Vissers, J. Wheeler, J. Aumen- tado, J. Hubmayr, J. Ullom, and J. Gao, Three- wave mixing kinetic inductance traveling-wave am- plifier with near-quantum-limited noise performance, PRX Quantum 2, 010302 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Zhang, W

    W. Zhang, W. Huang, M. E. Gershenson, and M. T. Bell, Josephson metamaterial with a widely tunable positive or negative kerr constant, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 051001 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    M. T. Bell and A. Samalov, Squid-based traveling wave parametric amplifier (2022), US Patent US11277107B2

    2022

  23. [31]

    M. T. Bell and A. Samolov, Traveling-wave parametric amplifier based on a chain of coupled asymmetric squids, Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 024014 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    C. Kow, V. Podolskiy, and A. Kamal, Self phase-matched broadband amplification with a left-handed josephson transmission line (2024), arXiv:2201.04660 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Planat, A

    L. Planat, A. Ranadive, R. Dassonneville, J. Puer- tas Mart ´ ınez, S. L´ eger, C. Naud, O. Buisson, W. Hasch- Guichard, D. M. Basko, and N. Roch, Photonic- crystal josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021021 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Ho Eom, P

    B. Ho Eom, P. K. Day, H. G. LeDuc, and J. Zmuidzinas, A wideband, low-noise superconducting amplifier with high dynamic range, Nature Physics 8, 623 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Ranadive, M

    A. Ranadive, M. Esposito, L. Planat, E. Bonet, C. Naud, O. Buisson, W. Guichard, and N. Roch, Kerr reversal in josephson meta-material and traveling wave parametric amplification, Nature Communications 13, 1737 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Boyd and D

    R. Boyd and D. Prato, Nonlinear Optics (Elsevier Sci- ence, 2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics , Optics and Photon- ics (Elsevier Science, 2013)

    G. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics , Optics and Photon- ics (Elsevier Science, 2013)

    2013

  30. [38]

    Malnou, B

    M. Malnou, B. T. Miller, J. A. Estrada, K. Genter, K. Cicak, J. D. Teufel, J. Aumentado, and F. Lecocq, A traveling-wave parametric amplifier and converter (2024), arXiv:2406.19476 [quant-ph]

    2024

  31. [39]

    Ranadive, B

    A. Ranadive, B. Fazliji, G. L. Gal, G. Cappelli, G. But- seraen, E. Bonet, E. Eyraud, S. B¨ ohling, L. Planat, A. Metelmann, and N. Roch, A traveling wave parametric amplifier isolator (2024), arXiv:2406.19752 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    K. M. Sliwa, M. Hatridge, A. Narla, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Re- configurable josephson circulator/directional amplifier, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041020 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    Lecocq, L

    F. Lecocq, L. Ranzani, G. A. Peterson, K. Ci- cak, R. W. Simmonds, J. D. Teufel, and J. Au- mentado, Nonreciprocal microwave signal process- ing with a field-programmable josephson amplifier, Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 024028 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Ranzani, S

    L. Ranzani, S. Kotler, A. J. Sirois, M. P. De- Feo, M. Castellanos-Beltran, K. Cicak, L. R. Vale, and J. Aumentado, Wideband isolation by frequency conversion in a josephson-junction transmission line, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 054035 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    B. Abdo, N. T. Bronn, O. Jinka, S. Olivadese, M. Brink, and J. M. Chow, Multi-path interferomet- ric josephson directional amplifier for qubit readout, Quantum Science and Technology 3, 024003 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    B. Abdo, K. Sliwa, S. Shankar, M. Hatridge, L. Frun- zio, R. Schoelkopf, and M. Devoret, Josephson directional amplifier for quantum measurement of superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 167701 (2014)

    2014

  37. [45]

    Lecocq, Qubit measurements using nonreciprocal am- plifiers (2025), APS March Meeting, MAR-X09

    F. Lecocq, Qubit measurements using nonreciprocal am- plifiers (2025), APS March Meeting, MAR-X09

    2025

  38. [46]

    Denney, B

    C. Denney, B. Miller, K. Cicak, K. Genter, J.Teufel, J. Aumentado, and F. Lecocq, Using a traveling-wave parametric amplifier and converter for qubit readout (2025), APS March Meeting, MAR-S09

    2025

  39. [47]

    LNF double junction isolator, https://lownoisefactory.com/products/ (2025), [Online; accessed April-2025]

    2025

  40. [48]

    Quinstar double junction isolator, https://quinstar.com/cryogenic-components/ (2025), [Online; accessed April-2025]

    2025

  41. [49]

    M. T. Bell, I. A. Sadovskyy, L. B. Ioffe, A. Y. Kitaev, and M. E. Gershenson, Quantum superinductor with tunable nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 137003 (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity , Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, 2004)

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity , Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, 2004)

    2004

  43. [51]

    Bothner, D

    D. Bothner, D. Wiedmaier, B. Ferdinand, R. Kleiner, and D. Koelle, Improving superconducting resonators in magnetic fields by reduced field focussing and engineered flux screening, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 034025 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    Dixon, J

    T. Dixon, J. Dunstan, G. Long, J. Williams, P. Meeson, and C. Shelly, Capturing complex behav- ior in josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifiers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 034058 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    A. Y. Levochkina, H. G. Ahmad, P. Mastrovito, I. Chatterjee, G. Serpico, L. D. Palma, R. Ferroiuolo, R. Satariano, P. Darvehi, A. Ranadive, G. Cappelli, G. L. Gal, L. Planat, D. Montemurro, D. Mas- sarotti, F. Tafuri, N. Roch, G. P. Pepe, and M. Es- posito, Investigating pump ...

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Low noise factory products, https://lownoisefactory.com/products/ (2025), [Online; accessed April-2025]

    2025

  47. [55]

    Whiteley, Josephson junctions in spice3, IEEE Trans - actions on Magnetics 27, 2902 (1991)

    S. Whiteley, Josephson junctions in spice3, IEEE Trans - actions on Magnetics 27, 2902 (1991)

    1991

  48. [56]

    Whiteley, Wrspice circuit simulator (2017)

    S. Whiteley, Wrspice circuit simulator (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    A. Y. Levochkina, H. G. Ahmad, P. Mastrovito, I. Chatterjee, D. Massarotti, D. Montemurro, F. Tafuri, G. Pepe, and M. Esposito, Numerical simulations of josephson traveling wave parametric amplifiers (jtwpas): Comparative study of open-source tools, IEEE Trans on Appl Supercond...

    2024

  50. [58]

    K. Peng, R. Poore, P. Krantz, D. E. Root, and K. P. O’Brien, X-parameter based design and simulation of josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifiers for quantum computing applications, in 2022 IEEE Int Conf on Quantum Comp and Eng (2022) pp. 331–340

    2022

  51. [59]

    Renberg Nilsson, D

    H. Renberg Nilsson, D. Shiri, R. Rehammar, A. Fa- davi Roudsari, and P. Delsing, Peripheral circuits for ideal performance of a traveling-wave parametric ampli- fier, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 064062 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    M. A. Morgan and T. A. Boyd, Reflectionless filter structures, IEEE Trans on Micro Theory and Tech 63, 1263 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.