REVIEW 3 cited by
Steerable Chatbots: Exploring Personalization Control Interfaces via LLM Activation Steering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Steerable Chatbots: Exploring Personalization Control Interfaces via LLM Activation Steering
read the original abstract
Personalizing LLM responses typically requires users to articulate their preferences through prompting, which can be burdensome at cold start and difficult to articulate in natural language. We introduce an alternative paradigm, steerable chatbots: rather than asking users to describe what they want, let them directly manipulate it via a linear factor. We implement this through activation steering, leveraging a linear scalar to control how strongly a preference is expressed in the LLM's output. We first assess the computational viability of activation steering as a method to control granular preference expression, then we explore how the factor can be exposed to users. We prototype three activation steering interface designs that vary on the axes of agency (user-led vs. system-driven) and fluidity (static vs. adaptive). A within-subjects user study (n=14) in cold-start personalization tasks shows the potential for steerable chatbots to align better with underlying user preferences than prompting alone, while revealing heterogeneous values around control, persistence, and transparency in LLM personalization.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Explaining and Breaking the Safety-Helpfulness Ceiling via Preference Dimensional Expansion
MORA breaks the safety-helpfulness trade-off in LLM alignment by pre-sampling single-reward prompts and rewriting them to expand multi-dimensional reward diversity, yielding 5-12.4% single-preference gains in sequenti...
-
Explaining and Breaking the Safety-Helpfulness Ceiling via Preference Dimensional Expansion
MORA breaks the safety-helpfulness ceiling in LLMs by pre-sampling single-reward prompts and rewriting them to incorporate multi-dimensional intents, delivering 5-12.4% gains in sequential alignment and 4.6% overall i...
-
Alignment has a Fantasia Problem
AI alignment must move beyond assuming users have fully formed goals and instead provide active cognitive support to help form and refine intent over time.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.