The candidates of 2$\alpha$ condensate around the 16O nucleus studied by the real-time evolution method

B. Zhou; M. Kimura; Q. Zhao; T. Oishi; Y.M. Htet

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 53 references

The candidates of 2$\alpha$ condensate around the 16O nucleus studied by the real-time evolution method

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two 24Mg states are the strongest core+α condensate candidates yet

desk verdict Solid REM re-examination of 16O+2α candidates that strengthens the case for the 0+3 state but overreaches for 0+4 by ignoring the open proton channel. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04975 v1 pith:NK7HCU7F submitted 2025-05-08 nucl-th nucl-ex

Y.M. Htet , T. Oishi , M. Kimura , Q. Zhao , B. Zhou This is my paper · ORCID

classification nucl-thnucl-ex

keywords alphacondensationcore-plus-alphaclusterreal-timeevolutionmethodanalyticalcontinuationincouplingconstantisoscalarmonopoletransition24Mgdecaywidthresonance

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to settle whether two excited $0^+$ states of $^{24}$Mg are genuine resonances in which two $\alpha$ particles form a gas-like cloud around an $^{16}$O core, a core+$2\alpha$ condensate. In earlier random-basis calculations these states were obscured by strong mixing with non-resonant continuum configurations. Using the real-time evolution method to generate the basis and analytic continuation in the coupling constant to extract decay widths, the authors find that the $0^+_3$ state near $-4.95$ MeV and the $0^+_4$ state near $-1.26$ MeV carry very large isoscalar monopole transition strengths ($145.0$ and $160.7$ fm$^4$), valence $\alpha$ radii near $4$ fm, and small $\alpha$-decay widths ($\le 0.01$ and $0.17$ MeV). The point of the paper is that these two states are the most firmly established candidates for $\alpha$ condensation around a core nucleus and that they should be observable in experiment.

What carries the argument

The engine is the real-time evolution method (REM): instead of drawing Gaussian cluster centroids at random, it solves the time-dependent variational equations of motion for the $\alpha$-particle positions and momenta, so the sampled wave packets follow physically relevant trajectories and the Hill-Wheeler basis built from them carries little continuum contamination. The analytic continuation in the coupling constant (ACCC) supplies the resonance parameters: an auxiliary potential is added to artificially bind the state, the bound energies are computed as a function of the coupling, and a Padé approximant in $\sqrt{\mu-\mu_0}$ extrapolates the complex energy to the physical point, giving each resonance energy and width. The isoscalar monopole transition strength $\mathrm{B(IS0)}$ from the ground state is the observable used to identify spatially extended cluster states.

What would settle it

An experiment or an extended calculation that opens the proton channel would settle the claim: the proton threshold lies at $-5.09$ MeV in the model, only $0.14$ MeV above the $0^+_3$ state, so a proton width comparable to the predicted $\alpha$ width would rule out the $0^+_3$ assignment; conversely, $\alpha$ inelastic scattering on $^{24}$Mg that finds no narrow $0^+$ states with monopole strength near $145$-$161$ fm$^4$ would falsify the condensate identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within a microscopic $^{16}$O+$2\alpha$ cluster model, the paper identifies the $0^+_3$ and $0^+_4$ states of $^{24}$Mg as resonant candidates for $2\alpha$ condensation around the $^{16}$O core. The real-time evolution method yields a convergent spectrum with far less contamination from non-resonant states than the earlier random-basis calculation, and analytic continuation in the coupling constant gives small $\alpha$-decay widths for these states. Their isoscalar monopole transition strengths, $\mathrm{B(IS0)}=145.0$ and $160.7$ fm$^4$, are close to the earlier calculation's values, and their valence $2\alpha$ distribution radii, about $4.1$ fm, match the expected radius of the Coulomb barrier around $^{16}$O, suggesting two $\alpha$ particles trapped between the core surface and the barrier. The paper concludes that the $0^+_3$ and $0^+_4$ states, roughly $5$ and $1$ MeV below the $^{16}$O+$2\alpha$ threshold, are strong candidates whose small $\alpha$ widths make experimental observation feasible.

Load-bearing premise

The $^{16}$O core is treated as inert, frozen into four $\alpha$ clusters at the corners of a $0.5$ fm tetrahedron with only its center of mass mobile, so every $^{24}$Mg state is described purely as $^{16}$O+$2\alpha$ and core excitation, deformation, and proton decay are absent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the $0^+_3$ and $0^+_4$ assignments are correct, $^{24}$Mg becomes the clearest known case of a core-plus-alpha condensate, and its narrow $0^+$ resonances can be searched for directly.
The small $\alpha$-decay width of the $0^+_3$ state ($\le 0.01$ MeV) makes it a particularly clean experimental target, with the $0^+_4$ state ($0.17$ MeV) still narrow enough to separate from the background.
The close agreement of the monopole strengths with the earlier calculation cross-validates both methods, so $\mathrm{B(IS0)}\approx 145$ and $161$ fm$^4$ become concrete benchmarks for future experiments.
The same REM-plus-ACCC procedure can be applied to other core-plus-alpha systems, such as $^{16}$O+$3\alpha$ ($^{28}$Si) or $^{40}$Ca+$3\alpha$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step is to include the proton channel, which the model omits; the proton threshold at $-5.09$ MeV lies only $0.14$ MeV above the $0^+_3$ state, so a microscopic calculation including protons could alter the $0^+_4$ width and test the assignment.
The same machinery could be turned on heavier cores and more valence alphas, where random-basis searches have been even more ambiguous; if REM keeps its convergence there, core+$n\alpha$ condensates may turn out to be a general near-threshold phenomenon.
The predicted valence radius of about $4$ fm, matched to the Coulomb barrier, implies a characteristic oscillatory structure in the monopole transition form factor; extracting that form factor from inelastic $\alpha$ scattering would test the spatial picture directly.
Because the core is frozen in a tetrahedron, a fully dynamical core could shift the two candidate states; the closeness of the $0^+_4$ state to the proton threshold makes the ordering sensitive to such effects.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The real content here is the method application: real-time evolution generation of basis states for 16O+2α, plus ACCC widths and valence radii. That is new relative to Ichikawa et al., and the convergence checks against the reflection radius and E* are a genuine improvement over the older random-basis approach. The B(IS0) values for 0+3 and 0+4 (145 and 161 fm^4) agree closely with the prior prediction, and the valence radii near 4 fm give a sensible physical picture of α particles trapped outside the core. Credit where due: the paper is transparent about its model limitations and does not hide the proton-channel problem for 0+4.

The soft spot is not subtle. The authors claim the small α widths make these states experimentally observable, but the model space excludes proton decay, and for 0+4 the proton Q-value is about 3.8 MeV. An open channel with that much energy can add a substantial width, so Γα = 0.17 MeV does not bound the total width. The paper itself concedes this in Section III.B, yet the abstract and conclusion still say "firmly establishing." That language is not supported, and a referee should push them to either estimate the proton width with a larger model or restrict the claim to 0+3, whose proton Q-value is small and whose width is only an upper limit anyway. The frozen tetrahedral core is a related but less immediate issue. Also, the unbound-state energies drift with evolution time, and the ACCC width for 0+3 is reported as an upper limit with no uncertainty estimate, so the quantitative widths should be read as indicative rather than firm.

Even with these caveats, the condensate interpretation for 0+3 survives; the paper's core result, that REM identifies two resonant states with strong monopole strength and small α widths, is a reasonable confirmation of an earlier prediction using a better solver. The overreach is in the conclusions, not in the calculation.

This paper deserves a serious referee. The method is sound, the claims are falsifiable, and the proton-channel gap can be addressed. I would send it to review, but I would ask the authors to soften the "firmly establishing" language and to present the 0+4 width as a partial width conditional on the missing proton channel. For a cluster-physics audience, this is a useful contribution; for experimentalists planning 24Mg searches, the takeaway should be that only 0+3 is a clean candidate right now.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies 24Mg in a 16O + 2α cluster model with a frozen tetrahedral 16O core, using the real-time evolution method (REM) to generate basis states from the equations of motion and then solving the Hill-Wheeler equation. The authors examine convergence with evolution time T, reflecting-wall radius R, and initial intrinsic excitation E*, and they use analytical continuation in the coupling constant (ACCC) to extract α-decay widths. They identify the 0+3 and 0+4 states as candidates for 2α condensation around 16O, with strong isoscalar monopole transition strengths B(IS0)=145.0 and 160.7 fm^4, valence radii near 4.1 fm, and α widths ≤0.01 and 0.17 MeV. The paper concludes that these states are firmly established condensate candidates and should be experimentally observable.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a valuable step toward a robust identification of core + nα condensate candidates, providing quantitative predictions for transition strengths and widths that can be compared with experiment. The REM approach is a genuine methodological improvement over random basis generation, and the paper is transparent about the model parameters and includes convergence checks over T, R, and E*. The B(IS0) values are in good agreement with Ref. [31], which is reassuring. However, the strength of the conclusion currently exceeds what the model evidence supports, mainly because the proton decay channel is omitted and because the convergence and error estimates for the resonance properties are incomplete. The manuscript is clearly written and the numerical procedure is described in enough detail to be reproduced.

major comments (4)

[Sec. III.A, Fig. 1] The energies of the unbound states 0+3 and 0+4 continue to drift downward with evolution time up to T = 4000 fm/c, and the text states that the energy 'slowly decreases over time due to coupling with the continuum.' A convergence criterion (for example, a plateau in E(T) over a substantial interval, or an extrapolation in 1/T) is needed before these eigenvalues can be presented as converged resonance energies; without it, the ACCC input depends on the arbitrary cutoff T.
[Sec. III.B, Table I] The reported Γ_α = 0.17 MeV for the 0+4 state does not bound the total decay width because the proton channel is outside the model space; the paper itself concedes that its influence on 0+4 'may be non-negligible.' With the proton threshold at −5.09 MeV and the 0+4 energy at −1.26 MeV, the proton Q-value is about 3.8 MeV, so the proton width may be comparable to or larger than the α width. The conclusions that the states are 'experimentally observable' and 'firmly established' therefore overstate what the model can support; the authors should either estimate the proton width or explicitly restrict the claim to the α-decay channel within the model space.
[Sec. II.D and Sec. III.B, Table I] No uncertainties are propagated for the ACCC widths or for the adopted energies; the convergence with R and E* is described only qualitatively, and the 0+3 width is quoted as '≤0.01 MeV' without stating whether this is an upper limit from the Padé extrapolation, a numerical resolution, or a statistical error. The choice M = N = 6 is also asserted to be 'large enough' without showing the rank dependence. Because the small widths are load-bearing for the observability claim, the authors should quantify the spread from R, E*, and Padé-rank variations.
[Sec. II.A, Eqs. (5)-(6)] The 16O core is frozen in a tetrahedral configuration with a fixed side length of 0.5 fm, and no sensitivity study is provided for this choice. Since the core size and stiffness can affect the B(IS0) values and the barrier that confines the valence alphas, a variation of the side length (or allowing core breathing) would test whether the identification of 0+3 and 0+4 as condensate candidates is robust against this model assumption.

minor comments (6)

[Sec. II.D, Eq. (18)] The denominator in Eq. (18) is written as 2µ, but the reduced mass was denoted by m in Eq. (16); since µ is also used as the ACCC coupling parameter, this is confusing and likely a typo for 2m.
[Sec. II.C and figure captions] The terms 'rebound radius' and 'reflecting wall' are used interchangeably; please choose one consistent term, preferably 'reflection radius.'
[Figures 1-3] The label 'α threhsold' should read 'α threshold'; please also check that the red dashed lines indicating Ref. [31] energies are clearly visible in the printed version.
[Table I] For the 0+1 and 0+2 bound states, the 'width' and 'B(IS0)' columns contain dashes; please state explicitly that these quantities are not applicable for bound states, and note that B(IS0) is given for 0+2 only.
[Sec. II.C, step 3] The text says sampled wave functions with overlap greater than 0.95 are removed, but the displayed condition requires the normalized squared overlap to be < 0.95 for every pair; please clarify the pruning algorithm, for example by stating that one member of each pair exceeding the threshold is discarded.
[Abstract and Sec. IV] The phrase 'firmly establishing' is stronger than the evidence presented, given the model-space limitations and the ACCC uncertainties; 'supporting the identification of' or 'providing evidence for' would be more appropriate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the REM calculation is an independent solution of the stated 16O+2α model; no target observable is an input by construction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The Hamiltonian (Volkov No. 2 with M=0.63) and the 16O+2α model space are taken from Ref. [31], but the REM basis is generated by the equation of motion and the Hill-Wheeler equation (Eqs. 7-14), not by fitting to the 0+3 and 0+4 states. The B(IS0) values, radii, and ACCC widths (Eqs. 15-18) are computed observables; the ACCC Padé coefficients are fitted to bound-state energies in the auxiliary region and extrapolated to the physical point, which is a standard analytic-continuation procedure rather than a fit of the reported widths. Agreement with Ichikawa et al. is a consistency check from the same Hamiltonian, not an independent empirical confirmation, but this is a limitation of the evidence base, not a circular reduction. The proton-decay caveat for the 0+4 state, explicitly flagged in Sec. III.B, is a model-space limitation and a correctness risk, not a circularity. No quoted equation reduces a predicted quantity to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a cluster model Hamiltonian and interaction taken from Ref. 31, with no new effective interaction. The genuinely new inputs are the REM basis-generation procedure and the ACCC width extraction. The fixed 16O core and the Volkov interaction are the main external assumptions; the wall radius and E* are numerical choices that affect the quoted energies.

free parameters (6)

Majorana exchange parameter M = 0.63
Volkov No.2 interaction parameter taken from Ref. 31; it controls the effective alpha-alpha and 16O-alpha attraction and therefore the positions of the candidate states relative to threshold.
16O core tetrahedron side length = 0.5 fm
Chosen by hand in Eqs. 5-6 to represent the 16O core as a frozen tetrahedral 4-alpha cluster; affects the core radius and the resulting valence radii.
Alpha cluster size parameter nu = 0.275 fm^-2
Chosen to reproduce the observed radius of 4He, as stated in Section II.A; an external calibration for the Gaussian wave packets.
Reflecting wall radius R = 7 fm
The rebound radius is scanned from 4 to 9 fm, and R=7 fm is selected because the energies are judged most reasonable; this choice affects the discretized resonance energies.
Initial intrinsic excitation E* = 35 MeV
Scanned from 20 to 50 MeV; E*=35 MeV is chosen for the final results because other values overestimate the energies, and no uncertainty is propagated from this choice.
ACCC Pade rank [M/N] = [6/6]
The Pade approximant order for the analytic continuation is set to M=N=6, stated to be 'large enough' without a quantitative convergence criterion.

assumptions (6)

standard math The time-dependent variational principle yields valid equations of motion for the Gaussian centroids (Eq. 7).
This is a standard variational framework, not proven in the paper, and underlies the entire REM basis generation.
domain assumption The Volkov No.2 effective interaction with M=0.63 adequately describes alpha-alpha and 16O-alpha interactions in this mass region.
Invoked in Eq. 1 and Section II.A, same as Ref. 31; no scattering data are used to validate it in this paper.
domain assumption The 16O core is inert and frozen in a tetrahedral 4-alpha configuration with side length 0.5 fm.
Eqs. 5-6 fix all internal core degrees of freedom; this excludes core excitation and deformation, which could affect the candidate states.
domain assumption Alpha clusters are structureless (0s)^4 Gaussian wave packets with no internal excitation.
Standard cluster-model assumption, stated in Eqs. 2-4; it restricts the internal structure of each alpha particle.
domain assumption ACCC Pade continuation of E(mu) from the bound region to the physical point is valid for these resonances.
The method assumes analyticity of the energy as a function of the auxiliary coupling mu and square-integrability for mu > mu0; stability at M=N=6 is asserted but not rigorously justified.
ad hoc to paper A finite reflecting wall at R=7 fm and evolution time 4000 fm/c yield converged approximations to the resonance states.
The wall is a numerical device; convergence is checked qualitatively in Figs. 1-3, but unbound state energies still drift with time, so the approximation is not fully controlled.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The candidates of 2$\alpha$ condensate around the 16O nucleus studied by the real-time evolution method." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NK7HCU7F

@misc{pith2026250504975,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The candidates of 2$\alpha$ condensate around the 16O nucleus studied by the real-time evolution method},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NK7HCU7F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04975}
}

abstract

Background: Searching for alpha condensation around a core nucleus, a new class of nuclear clustering, is an interesting topic. Previous theoretical studies predicted 16O + 2$\alpha$ condensed states. However, in those studies, the strong mixing with non-resonant states made the identification of true resonant states non-trivial. Purpose: To address this issue, we aim to provide a more robust theoretical verification of the 16O + 2$\alpha$ condensation. Our goal is to clearly identify the resonant states and predict their properties, such as decay widths. Method: We employ the real-time evolution method (REM), which generates physically important basis states using the equation of motion, minimizing contamination from the continuum. The analytical continuation in the coupling constant (ACCC) was used to estimate the $\alpha$-decay widths. Results: The present calculations show much better convergence of eigenstates, and the $0^+_3$ and $0^+_4$ states showed remarkable isoscalar monopole transition strengths, which were in good agreement with the predictions of Ichikawa et al. The small alpha-decay widths for these states suggest that experimental observation appears feasible. Conclusion: The present results show the reasonable agreement with a previous work, firmly establishing the $0^+_3$ and $0^+_4$ states approximately 5 and 1 MeV below the 16O + 2$\alpha$ threshold as candidates for the 2$\alpha$ condensation around the core nucleus 16O. The REM proved effective in identifying these states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04975 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. The energies of the five lowest 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. The energy of the five lowest 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

[31]

Kokalova, N

T. Kokalova, N. Itagaki, W. von Oertzen, and C. Wheldon, Signatures for multi- alpha - condensed states, Physical Review Letters 96, 192502 (2006)

work page 2006
[1]

Here, Emin denotes the lowest intrinsic energy, which is also calculated by the imaginary time evolution

Imaginary-time evolution: We evolve a randomly generated wave function in imag- inary time, and obtain a state excited by E∗ := Eint − Emin (MeV), which serves as the initial state for the real-time evolution. Here, Emin denotes the lowest intrinsic energy, which is also calculated by the imaginary time evolution. We tes ted several choices of E∗ from 20 ...

work page
[2]

To prevent α particles from escaping to inﬁnity, a spherical wall that reﬂects 6 the α particles is placed at a distance R from the origin of the coordinate

Real-time evolution: We calculate the real-time evolution of the system according to the EOM. To prevent α particles from escaping to inﬁnity, a spherical wall that reﬂects 6 the α particles is placed at a distance R from the origin of the coordinate. Several values of R (from 4 fm to 9 fm) were tested. The time evolution was calculated wit h a discrete t...

work page 2000
[3]

Namely, f or any combination of i and j, the following condition must be satisﬁed, |⟨P 0+ Φ( ti)|P 0+ Φ( tj)⟩|2 ⟨P 0+ Φ( ti)|P 0+ Φ( ti)⟩⟨P 0+ Φ( tj)|P 0+ Φ( tj)⟩ < 0

Selection of basis functions: To avoid redundancy in the basis set, sampled wave functions with an overlap greater than 0.95 are removed. Namely, f or any combination of i and j, the following condition must be satisﬁed, |⟨P 0+ Φ( ti)|P 0+ Φ( tj)⟩|2 ⟨P 0+ Φ( ti)|P 0+ Φ( ti)⟩⟨P 0+ Φ( tj)|P 0+ Φ( tj)⟩ < 0. 95, where P 0+ denotes the projection operator to J...

work page
[4]

The eigenenergies and eigenstates are obtained by solving t he HW equation

Solution of HW equation: The selected basis wave functions are projected to the J π = 0 + state. The eigenenergies and eigenstates are obtained by solving t he HW equation. The calculations are repeated with diﬀerent values of the rebound radius R and the initial excitation energy E∗ to check the convergence of the results. D. Analytical Continuation in t...

work page 2000
[5]

Hoyle, On nuclear reactions occuring in very hot stars .i

F. Hoyle, On nuclear reactions occuring in very hot stars .i. the synthesis of elements from carbon to nickel, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Ser ies 1, 121 (1954)

work page 1954
[6]

Morinaga, Interpretation of some of the excited state s of 4n self-conjugate nuclei, Physical Review 101, 254 (1956)

H. Morinaga, Interpretation of some of the excited state s of 4n self-conjugate nuclei, Physical Review 101, 254 (1956). 13

work page 1956
[7]

Uegaki, Y

E. Uegaki, Y. Abe, S. Okabe, and H. Tanaka, On the positive -parity states with anomalous -decay properties in 12c, Progress of Theoretical Physics 59, 1031 (1978)

work page 1978

Show all 53 references

[8]

Kamimura, Transition densities between states in 12c derived from the three-alpha resonating-group wave functions, Nuclear Physics A 351, 456 (1981)

M. Kamimura, Transition densities between states in 12c derived from the three-alpha resonating-group wave functions, Nuclear Physics A 351, 456 (1981)

1981
[9]

Bijker and F

R. Bijker and F. Iachello, Cluster states in nuclei as rep resentations of a u(nu+1) group, Physical Review C 61, 067305 (2000)

2000
[10]

Bijker and F

R. Bijker and F. Iachello, Cluster structure of light nuc lei, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 110, 103735 (2020)

2020
[11]

Tohsaki, H

A. Tohsaki, H. Horiuchi, P. Schuck, and G. R¨ opke, Alpha c luster condensation in c12 and o16, Physical Review Letters 87, 192501 (2001)

2001
[12]

Funaki, A

Y. Funaki, A. Tohsaki, H. Horiuchi, P. Schuck, and G. R¨ opke, Analysis of previous microscopic calculations for the second 0+ state in 12c in terms of 3alpha particle bose-condensed state, Physical Review C 67, 051306 (2003)

2003
[13]

Funaki, H

Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, W. von Oertzen, G. R¨ opke, P. Schu ck, A. Tohsaki, and T. Yamada, Concepts of nuclear alpha-particle condensation, Physica l Review C 80, 064326 (2009)

2009
[14]

Schuck, Y

P. Schuck, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, G. R¨ opke, A. Tohsaki , and T. Yamada, Alpha particle clusters and their condensation in nuclear systems, Physic a Scripta 91, 123001 (2016)

2016
[15]

Chernykh, H

M. Chernykh, H. Feldmeier, T. Neﬀ, P. von Neumann-Cosel, and A. Richter, Structure of the hoyle state in c12, Physical Review Letters 98, 032501 (2007)

2007
[16]

Epelbaum, H

E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, D. Lee, and U. G. Meißner, Ab-init io calculation of the hoyle state, Physical Review Letters 106, 192501 (2011)

2011
[17]

Epelbaum, H

E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißne r, and U. G. Meiner, Structure and rotations of the hoyle state, Physical Review Letters 109, 252501 (2012)

2012
[18]

Stellin, L

G. Stellin, L. Fortunato, and A. Vitturi, Electromagne tic selection rules in the triangular alpha-cluster model of 12c, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear an d Particle Physics 43, 085104 (2016)

2016
[19]

Lovato, S

A. Lovato, S. Gandolﬁ, J. Carlson, S. C. Pieper, and R. Sc hiavilla, Electromagnetic response of 12c : A ﬁrst-principles calculation, Physical Review Let ters 117, 082501 (2016)

2016
[20]

Otsuka, T

T. Otsuka, T. Abe, T. Yoshida, Y. Tsunoda, N. Shimizu, N. Itagaki, Y. Utsuno, J. Vary, P. Maris, and H. Ueno, Alpha-clustering in atomic nuclei fro m ﬁrst principles with statistical learning and the hoyle state character, Nature Communicati ons 13, 2234 (2022). 14

2022
[21]

S. Shen, S. Elhatisari, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, B.-N. Lu, an d U.-G. Meißner, Emergent geometry and duality in the carbon nucleus, Nature Communications 14, 2777 (2023)

2023
[22]

Wakasa, E

T. Wakasa, E. Ihara, K. Fujita, Y. Funaki, K. Hatanaka, H . Horiuchi, M. Itoh, J. Kamiya, G. R¨ opke, H. Sakaguchi, N. Sakamoto, Y. Sakemi, P. Schuck, Y . Shimizu, M. Takashina, S. Terashima, A. Tohsaki, M. Uchida, H. Yoshida, and M. Yosoi , New candidate for an alpha cluster ...

2007
[23]

Funaki, T

Y. Funaki, T. Yamada, H. Horiuchi, G. R¨ opke, P. Schuck, and A. Tohsaki, Alpha-particle condensation in o16 studied with a full four-body orthogona lity condition model calculation, Physical Review Letters 101, 082502 (2008)

2008
[24]

Adachi, T

S. Adachi, T. Kawabata, K. Minomo, T. Kadoya, N. Yokota, H. Akimune, T. Baba, H. Fu- jimura, M. Fujiwara, Y. Funaki, T. Furuno, T. Hashimoto, K. H atanaka, K. Inaba, Y. Ishii, M. Itoh, C. Iwamoto, K. Kawase, Y. Maeda, H. Matsubara, Y. Mat suda, H. Matsuno, T. Mo- rimoto, H. Mo...

2018
[25]

Funaki, Container evolution for cluster structures in o16, Physical Review C 97, 021304 (2018)

Y. Funaki, Container evolution for cluster structures in o16, Physical Review C 97, 021304 (2018)

2018
[26]

Adachi, Y

S. Adachi, Y. Fujikawa, T. Kawabata, H. Akimune, T. Doi, T. Furuno, T. Harada, K. Inaba, S. Ishida, M. Itoh, C. Iwamoto, N. Kobayashi, Y. Maeda, Y. Mat suda, M. Murata, S. Okamoto, A. Sakaue, R. Sekiya, A. Tamii, and M. Tsumura, Candidates fo r the 5alpha condensed state in 20...

2021
[27]

B. Zhou, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, Y.-G. Ma, G. R¨ opke, P. S chuck, A. Tohsaki, and T. Yamada, The 5alpha condensate state in 20ne, Nature Communications 14, 8206 (2023)

2023
[28]

Fujikawa, T

Y. Fujikawa, T. Kawabata, S. Adachi, S. Enyo, T. Furuno, Y. Hijikata, K. Himi, K. Hirose, Y. Honda, K. Inaba, H. Makii, K. Miyamoto, M. Murata, K. Nishi o, S. Okamoto, R. Orlandi, K. Sakanashi, F. Suzaki, S. Tsuji, K. Yahiro, and J. Zenihiro , Search for the 6alpha condensed s...

2024
[29]

Ikeda, N

K. Ikeda, N. Takigawa, and H. Horiuchi, The systematic s tructure-change into the molecule- like structures in the self-conjugate 4n nuclei, Progress o f Theoretical Physics Supplement E68, 464 (1968). 15

1968
[30]

von Oertzen, Dynamics of alpha-clusters in n = z nucle i, The European Physical Journal A 29, 133 (2006)

W. von Oertzen, Dynamics of alpha-clusters in n = z nucle i, The European Physical Journal A 29, 133 (2006)

2006
[32]

Itagaki, M

N. Itagaki, M. Kimura, C. Kurokawa, M. Ito, W. V. Oertzen , and W. von Oertzen, Alpha- condensed state with a core nucleus, Physical Review C 75, 037303 (2007)

2007
[33]

Itagaki, T

N. Itagaki, T. Kokalova, and W. von Oertzen, Three-alph a state around ca40, Physical Review C 82, 014312 (2010)

2010
[34]

Kawabata, T

T. Kawabata, T. Adachi, M. Fujiwara, K. Hatanaka, Y. Ish iguro, M. Itoh, Y. Maeda, H. Mat- subara, H. Miyasako, Y. Nozawa, T. Saito, S. Sakaguchi, Y. Sa samoto, Y. Shimizu, T. Taka- hashi, A. Tamii, S. Terashima, H. Tokieda, N. Tomida, T. Uesa ka, M. Uchida, Y. Yasuda, N. Yoko...

2011
[35]

Ichikawa, N

T. Ichikawa, N. Itagaki, T. Kawabata, T. Kokalova, and W . von Oertzen, Gas-like state of alpha clusters around a 16o core in 24mg, Physical Review C 83, 061301 (2011)

2011
[36]

Ichikawa, N

T. Ichikawa, N. Itagaki, Y. Kanada-En’Yo, T. Kokalova, and W. V. Oertzen, Search for three- alpha states around an 16o core in 28si, Physical Review C - Nu clear Physics 86, 031303 (2012)

2012
[37]

Kawabata, H

T. Kawabata, H. Akimune, H. Fujita, Y. Fujita, M. Fujiwa ra, K. Hara, K. Hatanaka, M. Itoh, Y. Kanada-En’yo, S. Kishi, K. Nakanishi, H. Sakaguchi, Y. Sh imbara, A. Tamii, S. Terashima, M. Uchida, T. Wakasa, Y. Yasuda, H. Yoshida, and M. Yosoi, 2al pha+t cluster structure in 11...

2007
[38]

Kanada-En’yo, Negative parity states of 11b and 11c a nd the similarity with 12c, Physical Review C 75, 024302 (2007)

Y. Kanada-En’yo, Negative parity states of 11b and 11c a nd the similarity with 12c, Physical Review C 75, 024302 (2007)

2007
[39]

Yamada, Y

T. Yamada, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, K. Ikeda, and A. Tohsa ki, Monopole excitation to cluster states, Progress of Theoretical Physics 120, 1139 (2008)

2008
[40]

R. Imai, T. Tada, and M. Kimura, Real-time evolution met hod and its application to the 3alpha cluster system, Physical Review C 99, 064327 (2019)

2019
[41]

V. I. Kukulin and V. M. Krasnopol’sky, Description of fe w-body systems via analytical con- tinuation in coupling constant, Journal of Physics A: Mathe matical and General 10, L33 (1977). 16

1977
[42]

A. B. Volkov, Equilibrium deformation calculations of the ground state energies of 1p shell nuclei, Nuclear Physics 74, 33 (1965)

1965
[43]

D. M. Brink, Proc. Int. School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Course 36, Varenna, , edited by C. Bloch (Academic Press, New York, 1965)

1965
[44]

B. Zhou, M. Kimura, Q. Zhao, and S. heon Shin, Microscopi c calculations for be isotopes within real-time evolution method, The European Physical J ournal A 56, 298 (2020)

2020
[45]

S. Shin, B. Zhou, and M. Kimura, Shape of c13 studied by th e real-time evolution method, Physical Review C 103, 054313 (2021)

2021
[46]

Q. Zhao, B. Zhou, M. Kimura, H. Motoki, and S. heon Shin, M icroscopic calculations of 6he and 6li with real-time evolution method, The European Physi cal Journal A 58, 25 (2022)

2022
[47]

Q. Zhao, M. Kimura, B. Zhou, and S. heon Shin, alpha forma tion probability in be10 and be12 within a microscopic cluster model, Physical Review C 106, 054313 (2022)

2022
[48]

Z. Yang, Y. Ye, B. Zhou, H. Baba, R. Chen, Y. Ge, B. Hu, H. Hu a, D. Jiang, M. Kimura, C. Li, K. Li, J. Li, Q. Li, X. Li, Z. Li, J. Lou, M. Nishimura, H. O tsu, D. Pang, W. Pu, R. Qiao, S. Sakaguchi, H. Sakurai, Y. Satou, Y. Togano, K. Tshoo, H. Wa ng, S. Wang, K. Wei, J. Xiao...

2023
[49]

D. L. Hill and J. A. Wheeler, Nuclear constitution and th e interpretation of ﬁssion phenomena, Physical Review 89, 1102 (1953)

1953
[50]

J. J. Griﬃn and J. A. Wheeler, Collective motions in nucl ei by the method of generator coordinates, Physical Review 108, 311 (1957)

1957
[51]

Tanaka, Y

N. Tanaka, Y. Suzuki, and K. Varga, Exploration of reson ances by analytic continuation in the coupling constant, Physical Review C 56, 562 (1997)

1997
[52]

Takatsu, Y

R. Takatsu, Y. Suzuki, W. Horiuchi, and M. Kimura, Micro scopic study of the deformed neutron halo of 31ne, Physical Review C 107, 024314 (2023)

2023
[53]

Vitturi, J

A. Vitturi, J. Casal, L. Fortunato, and E. G. Lanza, Tran sition densities and form factors in the triangular alpha-cluster model of c12, Physical Review C 101, 014315 (2020). 17

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [31]

Kokalova, N

T. Kokalova, N. Itagaki, W. von Oertzen, and C. Wheldon, Signatures for multi- alpha - condensed states, Physical Review Letters 96, 192502 (2006)

work page 2006

[2] [1]

Here, Emin denotes the lowest intrinsic energy, which is also calculated by the imaginary time evolution

Imaginary-time evolution: We evolve a randomly generated wave function in imag- inary time, and obtain a state excited by E∗ := Eint − Emin (MeV), which serves as the initial state for the real-time evolution. Here, Emin denotes the lowest intrinsic energy, which is also calculated by the imaginary time evolution. We tes ted several choices of E∗ from 20 ...

work page

[3] [2]

To prevent α particles from escaping to inﬁnity, a spherical wall that reﬂects 6 the α particles is placed at a distance R from the origin of the coordinate

Real-time evolution: We calculate the real-time evolution of the system according to the EOM. To prevent α particles from escaping to inﬁnity, a spherical wall that reﬂects 6 the α particles is placed at a distance R from the origin of the coordinate. Several values of R (from 4 fm to 9 fm) were tested. The time evolution was calculated wit h a discrete t...

work page 2000

[4] [3]

Namely, f or any combination of i and j, the following condition must be satisﬁed, |⟨P 0+ Φ( ti)|P 0+ Φ( tj)⟩|2 ⟨P 0+ Φ( ti)|P 0+ Φ( ti)⟩⟨P 0+ Φ( tj)|P 0+ Φ( tj)⟩ < 0

Selection of basis functions: To avoid redundancy in the basis set, sampled wave functions with an overlap greater than 0.95 are removed. Namely, f or any combination of i and j, the following condition must be satisﬁed, |⟨P 0+ Φ( ti)|P 0+ Φ( tj)⟩|2 ⟨P 0+ Φ( ti)|P 0+ Φ( ti)⟩⟨P 0+ Φ( tj)|P 0+ Φ( tj)⟩ < 0. 95, where P 0+ denotes the projection operator to J...

work page

[5] [4]

The eigenenergies and eigenstates are obtained by solving t he HW equation

Solution of HW equation: The selected basis wave functions are projected to the J π = 0 + state. The eigenenergies and eigenstates are obtained by solving t he HW equation. The calculations are repeated with diﬀerent values of the rebound radius R and the initial excitation energy E∗ to check the convergence of the results. D. Analytical Continuation in t...

work page 2000

[6] [5]

Hoyle, On nuclear reactions occuring in very hot stars .i

F. Hoyle, On nuclear reactions occuring in very hot stars .i. the synthesis of elements from carbon to nickel, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Ser ies 1, 121 (1954)

work page 1954

[7] [6]

Morinaga, Interpretation of some of the excited state s of 4n self-conjugate nuclei, Physical Review 101, 254 (1956)

H. Morinaga, Interpretation of some of the excited state s of 4n self-conjugate nuclei, Physical Review 101, 254 (1956). 13

work page 1956

[8] [7]

Uegaki, Y

E. Uegaki, Y. Abe, S. Okabe, and H. Tanaka, On the positive -parity states with anomalous -decay properties in 12c, Progress of Theoretical Physics 59, 1031 (1978)

work page 1978