Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Ghost-induced phase transition in the final stages of black hole evaporation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding quadratic-curvature corrections to gravity changes the final fate of evaporating black holes from empty space to a stable naked singularity.

desk verdict A plausible scenario, not a demonstration: the claimed evaporation endpoint is built on an un-derived flux ansatz with a sign chosen to get the desired branch. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05027 v1 pith:DIRBWQYP submitted 2025-05-08 gr-qc hep-th

Alfio Bonanno , Samuele Silveravalle This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C5783C7583D0583C47 PACS 04.70.Dy04.60.-m04.50.Kd
keywords blackholeevaporationquadraticgravityghostinstabilitynakedsingularityinformationparadoxphasetransitionmassivetriplepointcosmiccensorship
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that once quantum corrections to Einstein gravity are included, an evaporating Schwarzschild black hole cannot vanish into Minkowski space. Instead, when its mass drops to a critical value $M_c$, a ghost-induced instability sets in and drives the hole onto an unstable 'Yukawa-repulsive' branch of near-singular solutions. The endpoint of this evolution is a stable, finite-mass naked singularity, which the authors call the massive triple point, whose strong redshift hides the information it contains. If correct, the information paradox dissolves because information is trapped in the singularity rather than destroyed, and the singularity problem and information problem become a single unresolved issue.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the quadratic gravity action of Eq. (1), with Weyl-squared and Ricci-scalar-squared terms, whose massive spin-2 mode of mass $m_2$ is an Ostrogradsky ghost. Linear perturbation theory on Ricci-flat Schwarzschild backgrounds shows that this ghost mode grows exponentially for masses below $M_c$, and the same instability marks the Yukawa-repulsive non-Schwarzschild branch. The paper then proposes the flux ansatz of Eq. (10), $r^2\langle T_{tr}\rangle \sim \hbar/(15360\pi M^2)\,e^{\lambda(M-M_c)t}$, whose positive sign drives mass growth and whose prefactor recovers the standard Hawking result as $t\to 0$. Near the origin the field equations reduce to the autonomous dynamical system of Eq. (7), whose $(2,-2)$ fixed point persists under time dependence and is identified with the massive triple point, where the horizon radius vanishes while mass and singularity remain.

What would settle it

A first-principles computation of the renormalized stress-energy tensor $\langle T_{tr}\rangle$ for a Schwarzschild black hole in quadratic gravity would settle the matter: if its sign is negative rather than positive as the mass approaches $M_c$, the ghost-induced growth is reversed and the transition to the Yukawa-repulsive branch does not happen. A second check is to evolve the full nonlinear time-dependent field equations through the critical point and see whether the horizon persists and the solution reaches the $(2,-2)$ massive triple point rather than returning to the Schwarzschild branch.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that general quadratic curvature corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action prevent complete evaporation of Schwarzschild black holes into Minkowski vacuum. At the critical mass $M_c$ where the Schwarzschild and non-Schwarzschild solution branches cross, the massive spin-2 ghost mode of quadratic gravity becomes exponentially unstable; this instability acts as a phase transition whose order parameter is the Ricci tensor, which vanishes for Schwarzschild solutions but is nonzero for non-Schwarzschild ones. The authors argue that the unstable Yukawa-repulsive branch is the physically selected branch, and that the black hole evolves, with a positive energy flux corresponding to ghost emission, toward the massive triple point: a naked singularity with finite mass, a strong curvature singularity, and complete causal visibility. They conclude that the singularity persists indefinitely, so the information that falls into it is inaccessible but not destroyed.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scenario rests on the proposed energy-flux ansatz of Eq. (10), which is stated without derivation: if the true flux is negative or lacks the exponential instability factor, the black hole would continue evaporating to Minkowski space, and the claimed naked-singularity endpoint would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Black holes of any initial mass stop evaporating at a finite remnant mass $M_{\mathrm{mtp}}$ rather than disappearing, leaving stable naked singularities as evaporation endpoints.
  • The information paradox is reframed: information is not destroyed but permanently trapped behind a strong-redshift barrier, merging the paradox with the singularity problem.
  • The usual cosmic censorship intuition is weakened: singularities can be causally visible yet observationally hidden by extreme redshift and by the infinite energy needed to escape from the singularity itself.
  • The final stage of evaporation changes from runaway mass loss to mass growth under ghost emission, altering predicted lifetimes and event rates for primordial black holes.
  • The ghost of quadratic gravity is not an artifact to be artificially removed but the physical driver of the evaporation endpoint.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the endpoint is a finite-mass horizonless remnant, primordial black holes evaporating today would leave a population of heavy compact remnants that could behave as dark matter candidates, a cosmological implication the paper does not pursue.
  • The branch-selection principle, that a system with three coexisting phases at a critical point evolves along the direction of the unstable phase, may apply to other modified-gravity transitions such as scalarization and could be tested in analogue systems.
  • The sign reversal of the energy flux implies the black hole absorbs vacuum energy in its final phase; a corresponding spectral signature in late-time Hawking radiation, such as a cutoff or blueshift feature, would distinguish this scenario from standard evaporation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that an evaporating Schwarzschild black hole in quadratic gravity does not evaporate completely to Minkowski space. It argues that, when the black hole reaches the critical mass Mc at which the Schwarzschild and non-Schwarzschild branches cross, an instability of the massive tensor ghost drives a phase transition to the Yukawa-repulsive branch. The proposed evolution, governed by the energy-flux ansatz in Eq. (10), makes the black hole grow in mass and end at the 'massive triple point', a stable naked singularity with finite mass and no horizon. The authors claim that this endpoint resolves the information paradox because information is trapped but not destroyed at the persistent singularity.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism were established, the paper would offer a qualitatively new picture of black hole evaporation in which the information paradox is replaced by a persistent naked singularity, and it would connect black hole physics to the ghost instability of quadratic gravity in a concrete way. The paper has genuine strengths: it builds on the known classification of Einstein-Weyl black hole solutions, uses existing linear perturbation results near the critical point, and makes a falsifiable scenario that could be tested by a direct computation of the renormalized stress-energy tensor. However, as it stands, the central claim is not demonstrated: the mass-evolution input is an un-derived ansatz whose sign and growth rate are chosen to produce the desired branch, and the endpoint relies on unpublished or purely asserted stability. The significance is therefore conditional; the paper is a suggestive scenario rather than a derivation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (10), 'Physical insight into the non-linear evolution'] Equation (10) is the decisive input of the entire evolution, but it is introduced by fiat: the text says 'We propose the ansatz', and no computation of the expectation value ⟨T_tr⟩ for the massive tensor ghost on the Schwarzschild background near Mc is supplied. The exponential factor e^{λ(M(t)−Mc)t}, the 1/M^2 prefactor, and especially the positive sign are all stipulated. The sign is explicitly chosen 'for evolution toward Yukawa-repulsive black holes', so the mass growth visible in Fig. 4 is a direct consequence of the ansatz rather than a derived prediction. The paper needs a first-principles computation of the flux from a specified vacuum state and mode sum, or at least a quantitative estimate of when the ghost contribution overtakes the standard Hawking flux, before the claimed phase transition and endpoint can be accepted.
  2. [Section 'Physical insight into the non-linear evolution', endpoint at Mmtp] The claim that the endpoint is the massive triple point is not supported by the presented analysis. The authors state that the massive triple point is 'the point at which we truncate our evolutionary calculations', so the evolution toward it is not actually demonstrated. The stability of this endpoint is attributed to a 'preliminary linear perturbation analysis [16]' that is not reproduced, and reference [16] is a Ph.D. thesis that the reader cannot readily consult. Furthermore, the assertion that 'an event horizon cannot vanish instantaneously' is used to select the Yukawa-repulsive branch, but no causal or geometric statement of this principle is given; naked singularity formation is precisely a process in which the horizon disappears, so the principle requires proof rather than assertion.
  3. [Section 'Ghosts, instabilities and phase transitions', branch-selection argument] The branch-selection mechanism rests on the heuristic that when stable and unstable phases coexist at a critical point, 'the system itself becomes unstable and evolves along the direction of instability'. The authors themselves acknowledge that 'a complete description of the transition needs a non-linear analysis of the time-dependent equations', yet the conclusion that the system evolves to the Yukawa-repulsive branch is drawn without such an analysis. A quantitative treatment of fluctuations around the critical solution, or an explicit nonlinear solution, is needed to exclude the Yukawa-attractive branch and to justify the claimed phase transition.
  4. [Eq. (9), mass-evolution equation] Equation (9), which relates ∂t M(t) to the flux, is stated as following 'from the field equations and stress-energy conservation', but the derivation is not shown. Since Eq. (10) is inserted into Eq. (9) to generate the mass evolution, the reader cannot check the adiabatic limit, the dimensional consistency, or the sign conventions without the missing steps. Please provide the derivation or a precise reference for this relation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Conclusions] The concluding phrase 'we have demonstrated' overstates what the body of the paper establishes; the text itself repeatedly qualifies the analysis as 'preliminary', 'qualitative', and truncated at the massive triple point. Weaken the conclusion to match the presented evidence.
  2. [Eqs. (1), (2), (5)] The Yukawa charge S−2 is introduced in Eq. (2) but its superscript notation and sign conventions are never explained. Please define it explicitly and state its relation to the asymptotic expansion of the metric.
  3. [Eq. (1) and definitions of m0, m2] The definitions m0 = √(γ/6β) and m2 = √(γ/2α) implicitly assume β > 0 and α > 0; the manuscript should state this assumption and its physical motivation.
  4. [Fig. 1] The caption says the arrows indicate the direction of decreasing horizon radius, but for readers unfamiliar with the phase diagram it would help to show the critical mass Mc explicitly and to label which branch terminates at the massive triple point.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

The central phase-transition evolution is built into the sign-stipulated flux ansatz (Eq. 10), and the endpoint's stability rests on a self-cited preliminary thesis.

  1. self definitional [Section 'Physical insight into the non-linear evolution', Eq. (10)]
    "We propose the ansatz: lim_{r→∞} r^2⟨T_tr(r,t)⟩∼ ℏ/(15360πM^2c) e^{λ(M(t)−M_c)t}, where the exponential term captures the unstable behavior, the prefactor ensures recovery of the thermodynamic limit as t→0, and λ(M(t)−M_c) heuristically incorporates the growing imaginary frequency [25]. Crucially, for evolution toward Yukawa-repulsive black holes, the energy flux must be positive - opposite to the conventional case."

    The flux is not derived; its sign is stipulated to be positive precisely when the evolution is supposed to go to the Yukawa-repulsive branch. Inserting Eq. (10) into Eq. (9) forces M(t) to grow for M(t)<M_c because of the exponential factor, so the claimed phase transition and rapid mass growth are properties of the chosen ansatz, not independent outputs. The central conclusion that evaporation is prevented therefore reduces to the sign convention in the input.

  2. other [Section 'Physical insight into the non-linear evolution', after Fig. 4]
    "While the energy flux in Eq. (10) predictably drives extremely rapid mass growth, the evolutionary endpoint must necessarily be a stable, stationary solution. For black holes following the Yukawa-repulsive branch, this endpoint can only correspond to the limiting solution with mass M_mtp where the horizon radius vanishes - the point at which we truncate our evolutionary calculations."

    The endpoint is not obtained by continuing the evolution; the calculation is truncated at M_mtp and that truncation point is then called 'the evolutionary endpoint'. Since Eq. (10) was already constructed to drive mass growth, naming the stopping point as the final naked-singularity state completes the circle: the result is an assumption about where to stop, not a prediction derived from the dynamics.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 'Physical insight into the non-linear evolution', paragraph on the massive triple point]
    "Remarkably, preliminary linear perturbation analysis [16] demonstrates their stability, solidifying the massive triple point as a physically plausible evaporation endpoint."

    The stability of the massive triple point is load-bearing for the claim that the naked singularity persists as a stable endpoint. The only support cited is the author's own 'preliminary' Ph.D. thesis [16], with no proof or independent verification provided in the paper. Invoking one's own unpublished preliminary analysis as an external mathematical fact makes a central premise depend on an unverified self-citation.

full rationale

The paper contains genuine independent ingredients: the linear-stability classification of Schwarzschild and non-Schwarzschild branches relies on external analyses [24-26], and the existence of the massive triple point was established in earlier work. However, the dynamical conclusion that evaporation is prevented is not derived from those ingredients. The mass-evolution input, Eq. (10), is an ansatz whose exponential factor and positive sign are chosen so that, once the black hole drops below M_c, Eq. (9) forces mass growth; the authors then stop the evolution at M_mtp and call that the endpoint. The sign reversal is explicitly justified only by 'for evolution toward Yukawa-repulsive black holes, the energy flux must be positive', which is circular: the branch selection and endpoint are properties of the ansatz, not outputs. The stability of the endpoint is additionally supported by a self-cited 'preliminary' thesis ([16]) rather than by a proof in the paper. The score of 7 reflects that the central prediction reduces to a stipulated sign and a truncation rule, although the static black-hole framework and the stability analyses of the branches are independent contributions.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new particles or fields; the ghost is the known massive tensor mode, and the massive triple point was named in prior work. The key theoretical input is the ad hoc flux ansatz, which functions as a free parameter controlling the claimed endpoint.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha (Weyl coupling) = not fitted; used at Starobinsky-like order to estimate Mc ~ 4.8e-34 M_sun
    Sets the ghost mass scale and the critical mass Mc; not predicted by the paper, only constrained by experiments and chosen for numerical estimates.
  • lambda(M-Mc) growth rate = not specified; heuristic function
    Controls the exponential instability in the flux ansatz Eq. (10); the entire mass evolution depends on it, but no expression or derivation is provided.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Quadratic curvature terms are the leading quantum corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action (Eq. 1).
    Basis of the whole analysis; cited from [8-10] but not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The massive tensor mode is a ghost with negative kinetic energy and, when coupled to standard fields, triggers vacuum instability.
    Standard interpretation of Stelle's propagator; invoked to argue that instability only occurs in non-Schwarzschild backgrounds.
  • domain assumption The linear stability classification of Schwarzschild and non-Schwarzschild solutions from [24-26] is correct.
    Used to assert which branches are stable or unstable; not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption The near-origin dynamical system (7) governs the time evolution.
    Used to conclude that the (2,-2) behavior persists and that (-1,-1) can transition into (2,-2); derivation referenced to [23].
  • domain assumption The massive triple point is linearly stable.
    Based on 'preliminary linear perturbation analysis [16]', an author's PhD thesis that is not peer-reviewed.
  • ad hoc to paper An event horizon cannot vanish instantaneously.
    Invoked to select the Yukawa-repulsive branch as the physical outcome; no proof or external source is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ghost-induced phase transition in the final stages of black hole evaporation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DIRBWQYP

@misc{pith2026250505027,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ghost-induced phase transition in the final stages of black hole evaporation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DIRBWQYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05027}
}
read the original abstract

We explore a novel scenario in which a quantum-induced ghost instability drives the natural evolution of an evaporating Schwarzschild black hole toward a stable naked singularity. This process, arising from quadratic curvature corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action at high energies, circumvents the inconsistencies associated with classical naked singularities. The onset of ghost-driven instability signals a phase transition that fundamentally alters black hole evaporation, rendering the information paradox moot as it merges with the singularity issue. Our findings suggest a new pathway for black hole evolution at high-energy scales, offering insights that may bridge key gaps until a full theory of quantum gravity is realized.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05027 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Gravitational and thermodynamical properties of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Perturbations of black holes near the critical point: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. displays the flow diagram of the dynamical system in the limit x → ∞, corresponding to vanishing radius. As previously established in the linear analysis of [23], the (2, −2) fixed point exhibits stability, whereas the (−1, −1) fixed point possesses only marginal stability. Crucially, incorporating time dependence uncovers an essential physical feature: the (2, −2) behavior persists dynamically, while (−1, −1) behav… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evaporation of Schwarzschild black holes of initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spontaneous ghostification: how a dying black hole comes back as a naked singularity

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An evaporating black hole in quadratic gravity may spontaneously turn into a stable naked singularity driven by a ghost-induced instability.

  2. Finite geometry and black hole stability: Embedding discrete space into classical manifolds

    gr-qc 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper argues that a discrete geometry of information bits forces a nonzero minimum black hole volume, implying stable Planck-scale remnants.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [16]

    Charting unexplored avenues in Dark Matter

    demonstrates their stability, solidifying the massive triple point as a physically plausible evaporation endpoint. While naked singularities present theoretical challenges, they may not conflict with observations. In particular, three crucial aspects differentiate them from their General Relativity counterparts: the gravitational potential remains univers...

    work page

  2. [1]

    Bambi, ed., Regular Black Holes

    C. Bambi, ed., Regular Black Holes. Towards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse , Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology (Springer, 2023) arXiv:2307.13249 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [2]

    denotes the Green’s function of the Klein- Gordon operator, and C (⟨Tµν⟩) represents a functional combination of stress-energy tensor components. This expression is physically significant because M(t) asymptotically approaches the total mass as defined by both the Misner-Sharp [31] and Hawking-Hayward [32] formalisms at spatial infinity. From the field eq...

    work page

  4. [3]

    D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 301 (1980)

    work page 1980

  5. [4]

    Penrose, Riv

    R. Penrose, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 1, 252 (1969)

    1969

  6. [5]

    P. Chen, Y. C. Ong, and D.-h. Yeom, Phys. Rept. 603, 1 (2015), arXiv:1412.8366 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [6]

    S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975), [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  8. [7]

    S. W. Hawking, Nature 248, 30 (1974)

    1974

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    R. M. Wald (1997) pp. 69–85, arXiv:gr-qc/9710068

    1997 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Benedetti, EPL 102, 20007 (2013), arXiv:1301.4422 [hep-th]

    D. Benedetti, EPL 102, 20007 (2013), arXiv:1301.4422 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [10]

    symmetry breaking

    approaches to quantum gravity converge on the idea that quadratic curvature terms represent the first quantum corrections to General Relativity. The most general quadratic action can be written as S = Z d4x√−g γR−αCµνρσCµνρσ +βR2 +ηG , (1) whereG is the topological Gauss-Bonne...

    2025 arXiv

  4. [11]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A 20, 69 (1974)

    1974

  5. [12]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980)

    1980

  6. [13]

    Zwiebach, Phys

    B. Zwiebach, Phys. Lett. B 156, 315 (1985)

    1985

  7. [14]

    Stelle, Phys

    K. Stelle, Phys. Rev. D 16, 953 (1977)

    1977

  8. [15]

    J. Daas, K. Kuijpers, F. Saueressig, M. F. Wondrak, and H. Falcke, Astron. Astrophys. 673, A53 (2023), arXiv:2204.08480 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Silveravalle, Nuovo Cim

    S. Silveravalle, Nuovo Cim. C 45, 153 (2022), arXiv:2202.00999 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    S. M. Silveravalle, Isolated Objects in Quadratic Gravity: From Action Principles to Observations , Ph.D. thesis, Trento U. (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Nelson, Phys

    W. Nelson, Phys. Rev. D 82, 104026 (2010), arXiv:1010.3986 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  13. [21]

    H. Lu, A. Perkins, C. Pope, and K. Stelle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 171601 (2015), arXiv:1502.01028 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Silveravalle and A

    S. Silveravalle and A. Zuccotti, Phys. Rev. D107, 064029 (2023), arXiv:2210.13877 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 48, 3427 (1993), arXiv:gr- qc/9307038

    1993

  16. [24]

    H. L¨ u, A. Perkins, C. Pope, and K. Stelle, Phys. Rev. D 92, 124019 (2015), arXiv:1508.00010 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Goldstein and J

    K. Goldstein and J. J. Mashiyane, Phys. Rev. D 97, 024015 (2018), arXiv:1703.02803 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bonanno and S

    A. Bonanno and S. Silveravalle, Phys. Rev. D 99, 101501 (2019), arXiv:1903.08759 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    H. L¨ u, A. Perkins, C. N. Pope, and K. S. Stelle, Phys. Rev. D 96, 046006 (2017), arXiv:1704.05493 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Held and J

    A. Held and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 064060 (2023), arXiv:2209.01867 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Spina, and A. Zhidenko, (2025), arXiv:2505.01128 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bonanno and S

    A. Bonanno and S. Silveravalle, in 17th Marcel Grossmann Meeting: On Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation, and Relativistic Field Theories (2024) arXiv:2409.16690 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    B. L. Giacchini, in 14th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories, Vol. 2 (2017) pp. 1340–1345, arXiv:1612.01823 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 13, 198 (1976)

    1976

  25. [33]

    D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 16, 2402 (1977)

    1977

  26. [34]

    C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, Physical Review 136, 571 (1964)

    1964

  27. [35]

    S. A. Hayward, Phys. Rev. D 49, 831 (1994), arXiv:gr- qc/9303030

    1994

  28. [36]

    Corelli, M

    F. Corelli, M. De Amicis, T. Ikeda, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091501 (2023), arXiv:2205.13006 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Holdom and J

    B. Holdom and J. Ren, Phys. Rev. D 95, 084034 (2017), arXiv:1612.04889 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Holdom, Phys

    B. Holdom, Phys. Rev. D 101, 064063 (2020), arXiv:1909.11801 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Aydemir, B

    U. Aydemir, B. Holdom, and J. Ren, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024058 (2020), arXiv:2003.10682 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    D. D. Doneva, F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 015004 (2024), arXiv:2211.01766 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.