REVIEW 2 cited by
PADriver: Towards Personalized Autonomous Driving
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we propose PADriver, a novel closed-loop framework for personalized autonomous driving (PAD). Built upon Multi-modal Large Language Model (MLLM), PADriver takes streaming frames and personalized textual prompts as inputs. It autoaggressively performs scene understanding, danger level estimation and action decision. The predicted danger level reflects the risk of the potential action and provides an explicit reference for the final action, which corresponds to the preset personalized prompt. Moreover, we construct a closed-loop benchmark named PAD-Highway based on Highway-Env simulator to comprehensively evaluate the decision performance under traffic rules. The dataset contains 250 hours videos with high-quality annotation to facilitate the development of PAD behavior analysis. Experimental results on the constructed benchmark show that PADriver outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on different evaluation metrics, and enables various driving modes.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Driving Like Yourself: A Benchmark for Closed-Loop Personalized End-to-End Autonomous Driving
Person2Drive is a new benchmark that generates personalized driving datasets via simulation, quantifies styles with MMD and KL metrics, and adapts E2E-AD models using a style reward framework.
-
SanDRA: Safe Large-Language-Model-Based Decision Making for Automated Vehicles Using Reachability Analysis
LLM-generated driving actions are translated into temporal-logic formulas and passed through reachability analysis, permitting only actions with non-empty safe reachable sets to be executed.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.