Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 87 references

Finite Membrane Thickness Influences Hydrodynamics on the Nanoscale

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Finite membrane thickness changes how lipid bilayers relax nanoscale shape fluctuations, slowing their decay.

desk verdict A clean finite-thickness correction to membrane fluctuation dynamics, but the surface-shear mechanism is not uniquely identified without a tilt-inclusive check. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05776 v3 pith:PW5Q3L4E submitted 2025-05-09 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph

Zachary G. Lipel , Yannick A. D. Omar , Dimitrios Fraggedakis This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph
keywords lipidbilayerfinitemembranethicknessfluctuationsmembrane-fluidcouplingdispersionrelationnanoscalehydrodynamicsneutronspinechostagnationpoints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Lipid bilayers have usually been modeled as infinitely thin elastic sheets, but this paper argues that the finite thickness of the bilayer reshapes the hydrodynamics at the nanometer scale. From a continuum formulation that keeps explicit track of the membrane's two surfaces, the authors derive the dispersion relation $\omega(q) = -(\tfrac{1}{2}q^3+\Gamma q)/(\Gamma\,\mathrm{Ca}\,(4+q^2\ell^2))$, where the thickness $\ell$ appears in the denominator through $q^2\ell^2$. For wavenumbers $q>2/\ell$, the relaxation rate becomes linear in $q$, so nanoscale ripples decay more slowly than the classical $q^3$ bending scaling predicts. The cause is in-plane shear at the membrane–fluid interfaces: bending compresses and stretches the two surfaces, driving tangential bulk flows, pressure inversion, and extensional stagnation points that dissipate energy. This gives an experimentally testable signature in fluctuation spectra and implies that interfacial solute transport is influenced by thickness-scale hydrodynamics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the (2+$\delta$)-dimensional membrane: a two-dimensional mid-surface endowed with finite thickness $\delta$, whose balance laws retain the average and jump of bulk stresses evaluated at the actual interfaces $z=\pm\delta/2$. This formulation allows the top and bottom surfaces to move and shear differently while the surrounding fluid obeys the Stokes equations. Linearizing about a flat state and enforcing boundary conditions at the real surfaces rather than at $z=0$ puts the thickness into the dispersion relation through $q^2\ell^2$; the high-wavenumber slowdown comes from the surface-shear terms (the $O(\ell)$ terms in the momentum balance). The same machinery produces the stagnation-point positions and strain rates that characterize the new dissipative flow.

What would settle it

A neutron spin echo measurement on ~200 nm vesicles at scattering wavelengths below about 12 nm should resolve the relaxation rate: this paper predicts $\omega(q)\sim -q$ in that window, two-dimensional Helfrich theory gives $\omega(q)\sim -q^3$, and intermonolayer-slip models give $\omega(q)\sim -q^4$. Seeing either of the latter scalings there would falsify the claim that finite-thickness surface shear dominates nanoscale relaxation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that finite thickness changes membrane relaxation through dissipation rather than through elasticity. Solving the linearized balance laws for a bilayer of thickness $\delta$ in an incompressible viscous fluid gives $\omega(q) = -(\tfrac{1}{2}q^3+\Gamma q)/(\Gamma\,\mathrm{Ca}\,(4+q^2\ell^2))$ with $\ell=\delta/L$. The $q^2\ell^2$ term in the denominator is the thickness correction: once $q$ exceeds $q_2=2/\ell$, $\omega(q)\sim -q$, so short-wavelength shape fluctuations relax much more slowly than a strict two-dimensional theory predicts. In this regime bending induces tangential motion of the membrane surfaces; through no-slip, that motion drives in-plane bulk flows, reverses the sign of the pressure at the membrane crests, and creates circulatory and extensional stagnation points. The extensional points carry strain rate $\dot{\epsilon} = \tfrac{1}{2}\omega h_0(\ell q - 2)\exp(-2/(\ell q - 2))$, a previously unidentified channel of bulk viscous dissipation. The elastic response remains the standard Helfrich bending-plus-tension energy; all thickness effects enter through the hydrodynamic coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes the bilayer's elastic energy is exactly that of an infinitely thin Helfrich sheet (bending plus tension), so all finite-thickness effects enter through hydrodynamic coupling; if lipid tilt stiffness becomes significant at wavelengths near the membrane thickness, the predicted linear-$q$ slowdown would no longer be a unique hydrodynamic signature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Shape fluctuations at wavelengths of order the membrane thickness (roughly 4–12 nm for typical vesicles) relax with rate $\omega\sim -q$ rather than $-q^3$, so nanometer ripples persist longer than two-dimensional models predict.
  • The effective friction $\zeta_q^{\mathrm{eff}} = \mathrm{Ca}\,\Gamma q (4+q^2\ell^2)$ depends on wavenumber, so fluctuation spectra from neutron spin echo and related techniques should show thickness-induced deviations that cannot be absorbed into a renormalized bending modulus.
  • Pressure inversion at the membrane surface, together with the two stagnation-point classes (circulatory with zero strain rate, extensional with strain rate $\dot{\epsilon}$), gives concrete flow features that high-resolution particle tracking could visualize near supported or free-standing bilayers.
  • The thickness mechanism is complementary to intermonolayer slip: the two dissipative channels operate in different wavenumber windows, so a unified theory combining them could describe bilayer dynamics across all scales.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is correct, tracking tracer particles within about 10 nm of a supported bilayer should reveal in-plane flow reversal and localized stagnation points at wavelengths below the threshold, a signature that no two-dimensional membrane model produces.
  • Because elastic tilt theories also produce a linear-$q$ high-wavenumber spectrum, distinguishing the hydrodynamic from the elastic origin requires measuring the dissipative part of the response (for instance through the frequency dependence of the effective friction), not just the static fluctuation spectrum.
  • The predicted flows are wavenumber-selective: modes above and below $q_2=2/\ell$ drive opposite near-surface flow directions, so solute transport or ion concentration profiles near membranes could be modulated by which fluctuation modes are excited—a hypothesis that permeability or ion-profile measurements could test.
  • If the same (2+$\delta$)-dimensional machinery is applied to active membranes, the surface-shear coupling identified here would also redirect flows generated by curvature-active proteins, since the passive dissipation channel is precisely the channel through which surface traction couples to the bulk fluid.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. This Letter develops a finite-thickness continuum model for lipid membrane fluctuations, based on the authors' earlier (2+δ)-dimensional theory of lipid membranes. The model couples a membrane of thickness δ to the surrounding Stokes fluid through boundary conditions at the actual membrane–fluid interfaces, and yields a dispersion relation, Eq. (3), in which finite-thickness effects enter through a q²ℓ² term in the denominator. The paper analyzes the resulting three dynamical regimes, focusing on the high-wavenumber regime q > q2 = 2/ℓ, where the relaxation rate scales as ω ∼ q rather than the q³ of strictly two-dimensional bending-dominated membranes. It attributes this slowdown to in-plane surface shear generated by bending-induced compression/expansion of the membrane surfaces, and presents the associated flow fields, including pressure inversion at the membrane and the appearance of circulatory and extensional stagnation points. The Discussion connects the dispersion relation to a Langevin description, compares the mechanism with intermonolayer-slip and lipid-tilt models, and outlines possible experimental probes using neutron spin echo and particle tracking velocimetry, while explicitly noting that molecular details such as lipid tilt are outside the present continuum description.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, the paper offers a new, parameter-free hydrodynamical mechanism by which finite membrane thickness slows nanoscale shape fluctuations, distinct from both the classical Helfrich model and the intermonolayer-slip model. The main strength is that Eq. (3) is derived from a consistent continuum framework with no fitted parameters, and it yields specific, falsifiable predictions: the high-q crossover at q = 2/ℓ, the linear ω∼q regime, pressure inversion, and the location and strain rate of extensional stagnation points. The paper is also unusually candid about its limitations, explicitly acknowledging the neglect of lipid tilt and the approach of molecular length scales at the relevant wavelengths. The discussion of the degeneracy between tilt-based elastic theories and the present hydrodynamic mechanism is a useful contribution in itself, as it warns against overinterpreting a linear high-q dispersion alone. However, the experimental timescale estimate in the Discussion appears quantitatively inconsistent with Eq. (3), which is a concrete error that should be corrected.

major comments (1)
  1. [Discussion (experimental prospects), after Eq. (6)] The timescale estimate is not consistent with the derived dispersion relation. For the parameters of Fig. 1 (L=200 nm, kb=62 pN·nm, Λ0=10⁻³ pN·nm⁻¹, µb=10⁻³ pN·nm⁻²·µs, δ=4 nm), the crossover q2=2/ℓ=100 corresponds to λ_scatter≈2πL/q2≈12.6 nm. Using Eq. (3) in physical units, the relaxation rate at q=0.5 nm⁻¹ is ω_phys=−(1/2 kb q³ + Λ0 q)/(µb(4+q²δ²)) ≈ −484 µs⁻¹, giving τ≈2 ns. The text reports τ=µb λ³/(Γ kb)≈40 ns, which is roughly a factor of 20 larger. Please correct the formula or explicitly define τ in terms of the dispersion relation; as written, the quantitative claim about the accessible NSE window does not follow from Eq. (3).
minor comments (6)
  1. [Results, Fig. 1(b) discussion] The sentence 'the viscous mechanism that dissipates membrane fluctuations transitions from normal to in-plane drag around the wavenumber q = ℓ/2' contradicts the crossover defined earlier as q2 = 2/ℓ. The correct wavenumber is q = 2/ℓ.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains a duplicated word: 'where where Γ = Λ0L²/kb'.
  3. [Theory, Eqs. (1)–(3)] The dispersion relation Eq. (3) is independent of the membrane viscosity µm (or the Scriven–Love number SL), even though Eq. (2a) includes the term (SL/Γ)∇²_s v_α. The authors should state whether this independence is an assumption (e.g., SL=0) or a result of the derivation; otherwise readers may question the completeness of the model.
  4. [Discussion, tilt paragraph] The statement that including lipid tilt 'likely would only renormalize the elastic contributions as the viscous coupling between the membrane and fluid would remain unaltered' is plausible but not demonstrated. Since this is a central point in distinguishing the proposed hydrodynamic mechanism from tilt-based elastic mechanisms, the authors should explicitly label this statement as a conjecture and, if possible, provide a simple scaling estimate of the tilt contribution at q∼2/ℓ.
  5. [Discussion and Conclusion] The phrase 'extensional stagnation points give rise to a novel mode of bulk dissipation' is imprecise: viscous dissipation occurs throughout the bulk wherever strain rates are finite, and the stagnation points are locations where the velocity vanishes, not the cause of dissipation. Consider rephrasing to describe the extensional flow pattern, rather than the stagnation point itself, as the marker of this dissipation mode.
  6. [Abstract and Discussion] The abstract refers to 'bending-induced lipid reorientations' as a source of shear flows, but the Discussion later states 'we do not explicitly model lipid rotations.' These statements should be reconciled, for example by phrasing the abstract in terms of surface compression/extension arising from finite thickness, with lipid reorientation as an interpretation rather than a modeled degree of freedom.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the dispersion relation and flow predictions follow from an unfitted linear-response solution of the cited (2+δ) framework.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Eq. (3), is not obtained by fitting or by restating an input; it is the explicit solution of the linearized momentum balances, Eqs. (2a)-(2c), with no-slip boundary conditions at the membrane surfaces. The finite-thickness term q²ℓ² appears algebraically in the denominator through the boundary conditions at z = ±δ/2, and the crossover q2 = 2/ℓ and the high-q scaling ω(q) ∼ q are asymptotic consequences of that expression, not imposed inputs. The stagnation-point locations (Eq. (4)) and strain rates (Eq. (5)) are likewise derived from the solved flow fields, and all material parameters are taken from the literature rather than fitted to the predictions. The paper does cite the authors' own prior (2+δ)-dimensional framework (Refs. [38-40]) as the source of the governing equations, but that framework is used as a stated input premise, not as the result being derived; the present contribution is the linear-response analysis and the identification of the hydrodynamic mechanisms, which are independent of any fitted values. The paper also explicitly acknowledges that tilt-based elastic models produce a similar ω(q) ∼ q scaling and explains that tilt would enter the conservative part of the dispersion relation (Eqs. (8)-(9)); this is a candid robustness limitation, not a circular substitution of the result into its inputs. No step in the derivation chain reduces by construction to the paper's own assumptions, so the circularity burden is not met.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; material constants are taken from the literature. The model's axioms are the Stokes flow and no-slip assumptions, the Monge gauge linearization, the truncated (2+δ) expansion, and the explicit neglect of lipid tilt, which is acknowledged as a limitation. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The surrounding fluid obeys the incompressible Stokes equations at low Reynolds number
    Invoked in Theory section, appropriate for microbiological processes with Re ∼ 1e-6.
  • domain assumption No-slip boundary conditions hold at the membrane-fluid interfaces, with differential shear allowed between the two surfaces
    Stated in Theory: 'By applying classical no-slip boundary conditions between the membrane and the bulk fluids, while allowing for differential shear at the two membrane surfaces'.
  • domain assumption The (2+δ)-dimensional spectral expansion in the thickness direction is truncated at lowest order, giving the balance laws in Eqs. (1a)-(1c)
    The framework is from Refs. [38-40]; the truncation is the basis for the O(ℓ) shear terms.
  • ad hoc to paper Lipids remain rigid and aligned locally with the mid-surface (no tilt degree of freedom)
    Stated in Discussion: 'The present model assumes lipids remain rigid and aligned locally with the mid-surface. Including tilt would require additional higher-order corrections.' The central dissipative interpretation depends on this choice.
  • domain assumption Monge gauge with small height fluctuations
    Stated: 'we represent the membrane shape using the Monge gauge... valid for small deviations from flatness'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Finite Membrane Thickness Influences Hydrodynamics on the Nanoscale." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PW5Q3L4E

@misc{pith2026250505776,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Finite Membrane Thickness Influences Hydrodynamics on the Nanoscale},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PW5Q3L4E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05776}
}
read the original abstract

Many lipid membrane-mediated transport processes--such as mechanically-gated channel activation and solute transport--involve structural and dynamical features on membrane thickness length scales. Most existing membrane models, however, tend to adopt (quasi-)two-dimensional descriptions that neglect thickness-dependent phenomena relevant to internal membrane mechanics, and thus do not fully account for the complex coupling of lipid membranes with their surrounding fluid media. Therefore, explicitly incorporating membrane thickness effects in lipid membrane models will enable a more accurate description of the influence of membrane/fluid coupling on transport phenomena in the vicinity of the bilayer surfaces. Here, we present a continuum model for membrane fluctuations that accounts for finite membrane thickness and resolves hydrodynamic interactions between the bilayer and its surrounding fluid. By applying linear response analysis, we observe that membrane thickness-mediated effects, such as bending-induced lipid reorientations, can generate shear flows close to the membrane surface that slow down the relaxation of nanometer scale shape fluctuations. Additionally, we reveal the emergence of pressure inversion and flow reversal near the membrane interfaces, accompanied by localized stagnation points. Among these, extensional stagnation points give rise to a novel mode of bulk dissipation, originating from bending-induced compression and expansion of the membrane surfaces and their coupling to shear stresses in the fluid. Our findings identify membrane thickness as a key factor in nanoscale hydrodynamics and suggest that its effects may be detectable in fluctuation spectra and can be relevant to interfacial processes such as solute permeability and contact with solid boundaries or other membranes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05776 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a)–(i) The base state of the linear response problem. The membrane is stationary and embedded in a quiescent fluid. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a)–(i), (ii) The instantaneous ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Iwasa and I

    K. Iwasa and I. Tasaki, Mechanical changes in squid giant axons associated with production of action potentials, Biochemical And Biophysical Research Communications 95, 1328 (1980)

    1980

  2. [2]

    Watanabe, B

    S. Watanabe, B. R. Rost, M. Camacho-P´ erez, M. W. Davis, B. S¨ ohl-Kielczynski, C. Rosenmund, and E. M. Jorgensen, Ultrafast endocytosis at mouse hippocampal synapses, Nature 504, 242 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    Shi and T

    Z. Shi and T. Baumgart, Membrane tension and periph- eral protein density mediate membrane shape transitions, Nature Communications 6, 5974 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Carlson and L

    A. Carlson and L. Mahadevan, Protein mediated mem- brane adhesion, Physics Of Fluids 27 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    T. Ling, K. C. Boyle, V. Zuckerman, T. Flores, C. Ra- makrishnan, K. Deisseroth, and D. Palanker, High-speed interferometric imaging reveals dynamics of neuronal de- formation during the action potential, Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 117, 10278 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Helfrich, Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: Theory and possible experiments, Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung - Section C Journal Of Biosciences 28, 693 (1973)

    W. Helfrich, Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: Theory and possible experiments, Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung - Section C Journal Of Biosciences 28, 693 (1973)

    1973

  7. [7]

    Steigmann, Fluid films with curvature elasticity, Archive For Rational Mechanics And Analysis 150, 127 (1999)

    D. Steigmann, Fluid films with curvature elasticity, Archive For Rational Mechanics And Analysis 150, 127 (1999)

    1999

  8. [8]

    Deserno, Fluid lipid membranes: From differential geometry to curvature stresses, Chemistry And Physics Of Lipids 185, 11 (2015), publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd

    M. Deserno, Fluid lipid membranes: From differential geometry to curvature stresses, Chemistry And Physics Of Lipids 185, 11 (2015), publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd

    work page 2015

Show all 87 references
  1. [9]

    A. Sahu, R. A. Sauer, and K. K. Mandadapu, Irreversible thermodynamics of curved lipid membranes, Physical Re- view E 96, 1 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    J. Liu, M. Kaksonen, D. G. Drubin, and G. Oster, En- docytic vesicle scission by lipid phase boundary forces, Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 103, 10277 (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    Agrawal and D

    A. Agrawal and D. J. Steigmann, Modeling protein- mediated morphology in biomembranes, Biomechanics And Modeling In Mechanobiology 8, 371 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Dmitrieff and F

    S. Dmitrieff and F. N´ ed´ elec, Membrane mechanics of en- docytosis in cells with turgor, PLOS Computational Bi- ology 11, e1004538 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Y. A. Omar, A. Sahu, R. A. Sauer, and K. K. Man- dadapu, Nonaxisymmetric shapes of biological mem- branes from locally induced curvature, Biophysical Jour- nal 119, 1065 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Saffman and M

    P. Saffman and M. Delbr¨ uck, Brownian motion in biolog- ical membranes., Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 72, 3111 (1975)

    1975

  7. [15]

    Agrawal and D

    A. Agrawal and D. J. Steigmann, A model for surface diffusion of trans-membrane proteins on lipid bilayers, Zeitschrift F¨ ur Angewandte Mathematik Und Physik62, 549 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Samanta and N

    R. Samanta and N. Oppenheimer, Vortex flows and streamline topology in curved biologi- cal membranes, Physics of Fluids 33, 051906 (2021), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0052213/19762549/051906 1 online.pdf

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    Phillips, T

    R. Phillips, T. Ursell, P. Wiggins, and P. Sens, Emerg- ing roles for lipids in shaping membrane-protein function, Nature 459, 379 (2009)

    2009

  10. [18]

    A. C. Woodka, P. D. Butler, L. Porcar, B. Farago, and M. Nagao, Lipid bilayers and membrane dynamics: in- sight into thickness fluctuations, Physical Review Letters 109, 058102 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Frallicciardi, J

    J. Frallicciardi, J. Melcr, P. Siginou, S. J. Marrink, and B. Poolman, Membrane thickness, lipid phase and sterol type are determining factors in the permeability of mem- branes to small solutes, Nature Communications13, 1605 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Seifert and S

    U. Seifert and S. A. Langer, Viscous modes of fluid bilayer membranes, Europhysics Letters 23, 71 (1993)

    1993

  13. [21]

    Evans and A

    E. Evans and A. Yeung, Hidden dynamics in rapid changes of bilayer shape, Chemistry And Physics Of Lipids 73, 39 (1994)

    1994

  14. [22]

    Merkel, E

    R. Merkel, E. Sackmann, and E. Evans, Molecular fric- tion and epitactic coupling between monolayers in sup- ported bilayers, Journal De Physique 50, 1535 (1989)

    1989

  15. [23]

    Yeung and E

    A. Yeung and E. Evans, Unexpected dynamics in shape fluctuations of bilayer vesicles, Journal De Physique Ii 5, 1501 (1995)

    1995

  16. [24]

    M. C. Watson, Y. Peng, Y. Zheng, and F. L. Brown, The intermediate scattering function for lipid bilayer mem- branes: From nanometers to microns, The Journal Of Chemical Physics 135 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Fournier, On the hydrodynamics of bilayer mem- branes, International Journal Of Non-Linear Mechanics 75, 67 (2015)

    J.-b. Fournier, On the hydrodynamics of bilayer mem- branes, International Journal Of Non-Linear Mechanics 75, 67 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    M. M. Terzi and M. Deserno, Novel tilt-curvature cou- pling in lipid membranes, The Journal Of Chemical Physics 147 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    M. M. Terzi, M. F. Erg¨ uder, and M. Deserno, A con- sistent quadratic curvature-tilt theory for fluid lipid membranes, The Journal of Chemical Physics 151, 164108 (2019), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5119683/15566258/164108 1 online.pdf

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    Z. A. Levine, R. M. Venable, M. C. Watson, M. G. Lerner, J.-E. Shea, R. W. Pastor, and F. L. H. Brown, Determination of biomembrane bending moduli in fully atomistic simulations, Journal of the American Chemical Society 136, 13582 (2014), pMID: 25202918, https://doi.org/10.102...

    2014 doi

  21. [29]

    Hamm and M

    M. Hamm and M. Kozlov, Elastic energy of tilt and bend- ing of fluid membranes, The European Physical Journal E 3, 323 (2000)

    2000

  22. [30]

    K. V. Pinigin, P. I. Kuzmin, S. A. Akimov, and T. R. Galimzyanov, Additional contributions to elastic energy of lipid membranes: Tilt-curvature coupling and curva- ture gradient, Physical Review E 102, 042406 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Deseri, M

    L. Deseri, M. D. Piccioni, and G. Zurlo, Derivation of a new free energy for biological membranes, Continuum Mechanics And Thermodynamics 20, 255 (2008)

    2008

  24. [32]

    H. A. Faizi, R. Granek, and P. M. Vlahovska, Curva- ture fluctuations of fluid vesicles reveal hydrodynamic dissipation within the bilayer, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 121, e2413557121 (2024), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2413557121

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    Rahimi and M

    M. Rahimi and M. Arroyo, Shape dynamics, lipid hy- 9 drodynamics, and the complex viscoelasticity of bilayer membranes, Physical Review E 86, 011932 (2012)

    2012

  26. [35]

    Nagao, E

    M. Nagao, E. G. Kelley, R. Ashkar, R. Bradbury, and P. D. Butler, Probing elastic and viscous properties of phospholipid bilayers using neutron spin echo spec- troscopy, The Journal Of Physical Chemistry Letters 8, 4679 (2017)

    2017

  27. [36]

    Alberts, J

    B. Alberts, J. Watson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, A. Johnson, and P. Walter, Molecular Biology of the Cell (Garland Science, New York City, 2002)

    2002

  28. [37]

    Phillips, Membranes by the numbers, Physics Of Bi- ological Membranes , 73 (2018)

    R. Phillips, Membranes by the numbers, Physics Of Bi- ological Membranes , 73 (2018)

    2018

  29. [38]

    Y. A. Omar, Z. G. Lipel, and K. K. Mandadapu, The (2+ δ)–dimensional theory of the electromechanics of lipid membranes: Electrostatics, Physical Review E 109, 054401 (2024)

    2024

  30. [39]

    Y. A. Omar, Z. G. Lipel, and K. K. Mandadapu, (2+ δ)- dimensional theory of the electromechanics of lipid mem- branes. ii. balance laws, Physical Review E 112, 024406 (2025)

    2025

  31. [40]

    Y. A. Omar, Z. G. Lipel, and K. K. Mandadapu, (2+ δ)- dimensional theory of the electromechanics of lipid mem- branes. iii. constitutive models, Physical Review E 112, 024407 (2025)

    2025

  32. [41]

    Monge, Application de l’analyse ` a la g´ eom´ etrie (Bernard, Paris, 1807)

    G. Monge, Application de l’analyse ` a la g´ eom´ etrie (Bernard, Paris, 1807)

  33. [42]

    P. B. Canham, The minimum energy of bending as a possible explanation of the biconcave shape of the human red blood cell, Journal Of Theoretical Biology 26, 61 (1970)

    1970

  34. [43]

    Happel and H

    J. Happel and H. Brenner, Mechanics of fluids and trans- port processes, Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. With Special Applications To Particulate Media. M. Ni- jhoff, Leiden (1983)

    1983

  35. [44]

    Kim and S

    S. Kim and S. J. Karrila, Microhydrodynamics: prin- ciples and selected applications, Butterworth-Heinemann series in chemical engineering (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1991)

    1991

  36. [45]

    E. M. Purcell, Life at low reynolds number, American Journal Of Physics 45, 3 (1977)

    1977

  37. [46]

    A. Sahu, A. Glisman, J. Tchoufag, and K. K. Man- dadapu, Geometry and dynamics of lipid membranes: the scriven-love number, Physical Review E 101, 052401 (2020)

    2020

  38. [47]

    P´ ecr´ eaux, H.-g

    J. P´ ecr´ eaux, H.-g. D¨ obereiner, J. Prost, J.-f. Joanny, and P. Bassereau, Refined contour analysis of giant unilamel- lar vesicles, The European Physical Journal E 13, 277 (2004)

    2004

  39. [48]

    S. C. Takatori and A. Sahu, Active contact forces drive nonequilibrium fluctuations in membrane vesicles, Phys- ical Review Letters 124, 158102 (2020)

    2020

  40. [49]

    J. Dai, M. P. Sheetz, X. Wan, and C. E. Morris, Mem- brane tension in swelling and shrinking molluscan neu- rons, Journal Of Neuroscience 18, 6681 (1998)

    1998

  41. [50]

    Z. Shi, Z. T. Graber, T. Baumgart, H. A. Stone, and A. E. Cohen, Cell membranes resist flow, Cell 175, 1769 (2018)

    2018

  42. [51]

    Leduc, O

    C. Leduc, O. Camp` as, K. B. Zeldovich, A. Roux, P. Jolimaitre, L. Bourel-Bonnet, B. Goud, J.-f. Joanny, P. Bassereau, and J. Prost, Cooperative extraction of membrane nanotubes by molecular motors, Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences101, 17096 (2004)

    2004

  43. [52]

    Nan and D

    B. Nan and D. R. Zusman, Uncovering the mystery of gliding motility in the myxobacteria, Annual Review Of Genetics 45, 21 (2011)

    2011

  44. [53]

    Tchoufag, P

    J. Tchoufag, P. Ghosh, C. B. Pogue, B. Nan, and K. K. Mandadapu, Mechanisms for bacterial gliding motility on soft substrates, Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 116, 25087 (2019)

    2019

  45. [54]

    Helfrich and R

    W. Helfrich and R. m. Servuss, Undulations, steric in- teraction and cohesion of fluid membranes, Il Nuovo Ci- mento D 3, 137 (1984)

    1984

  46. [55]

    Mutz and W

    M. Mutz and W. Helfrich, Bending rigidities of some bi- ological model membranes as obtained from the fourier analysis of contour sections, Journal De Physique51, 991 (1990)

    1990

  47. [56]

    Brochard and J

    F. Brochard and J. Lennon, Frequency spectrum of the flicker phenomenon in erythrocytes, Journal De Physique 36, 1035 (1975)

    1975

  48. [57]

    A. G. Zilman and R. Granek, Membrane dynamics and structure factor, Chemical Physics 284, 195 (2002)

    2002

  49. [58]

    Z. Yi, M. Nagao, and D. P. Bossev, Bending elasticity of saturated and monounsaturated phospholipid mem- branes studied by the neutron spin echo technique, Jour- nal Of Physics: Condensed Matter 21, 155104 (2009)

    2009

  50. [59]

    Nagao, Observation of local thickness fluctuations in surfactant membranes using neutron spin echo, Physical Review E 80, 031606 (2009)

    M. Nagao, Observation of local thickness fluctuations in surfactant membranes using neutron spin echo, Physical Review E 80, 031606 (2009)

    2009

  51. [60]

    E. G. Kelley, M. P. Frewein, O. Czakkel, and M. Nagao, Nanoscale bending dynamics in mixed-chain lipid mem- branes, Symmetry 15, 191 (2023)

    2023

  52. [61]

    Monzel and K

    C. Monzel and K. Sengupta, Measuring shape fluctua- tions in biological membranes, Journal Of Physics D: Ap- plied Physics 49, 243002 (2016)

    2016

  53. [62]

    Granek, From semi-flexible polymers to membranes: anomalous diffusion and reptation, Journal De Physique 7, 1761 (1997)

    R. Granek, From semi-flexible polymers to membranes: anomalous diffusion and reptation, Journal De Physique 7, 1761 (1997)

    1997

  54. [63]

    Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Reports On Progress In Physics 29, 255 (1966)

    R. Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Reports On Progress In Physics 29, 255 (1966)

    1966

  55. [64]

    Lacoste and A

    D. Lacoste and A. W. C. Lau, Dynamics of active mem- branes with internal noise, Europhysics Letters 70, 418 (2005)

    2005

  56. [65]

    Nagao and H

    M. Nagao and H. Seto, Neutron scattering studies on dy- namics of lipid membranes, Biophysics Reviews 4 (2023)

    2023

  57. [66]

    A. G. Zilman and R. Granek, Undulations and dynamic structure factor of membranes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4788 (1996)

    1996

  58. [67]

    Tanaka, Y

    M. Tanaka, Y. Saeki, I. Hanasaki, and Y. Kazoe, Ef- fect of finite spatial and temporal resolutions on super- resolution particle tracking velocimetry for pressure- driven flow in a nanochannel, Microfluidics and Nanoflu- idics 28, 39 (2024)

    2024

  59. [68]

    Kazoe, K

    Y. Kazoe, K. Shibata, and T. Kitamori, Super-resolution defocusing nanoparticle image velocimetry utilizing spherical aberration for nanochannel flows, Analytical Chemistry 93, 13260 (2021)

    2021

  60. [69]

    Sadeghi and F

    M. Sadeghi and F. No´ e, Hydrodynamic coupling for particle-based solvent-free membrane models, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 155 (2021)

    2021

  61. [70]

    T. R. Galimzyanov, P. V. Bashkirov, P. S. Blank, J. Zim- merberg, O. V. Batishchev, and S. A. Akimov, Mono- layerwise application of linear elasticity theory well de- scribes strongly deformed lipid membranes and the effect of solvent, Soft Matter 16, 1179 (2020)

    2020

  62. [71]

    Rodriguez-Garcia, L

    R. Rodriguez-Garcia, L. Arriaga, M. Mell, L. Moleiro, 10 I. Lopez-Montero, and F. Monroy, Bimodal spectrum for the curvature fluctuations of bilayer vesicles: Pure bend- ing plus hybrid curvature-dilation modes, Physical review letters 102, 128101 (2009)

    2009

  63. [72]

    A. L. Hodgkin and B. Katz, The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of the giant axon of the squid, The Journal of physiology 108, 37 (1949)

    1949

  64. [73]

    Hille, Ionic channels in excitable membranes

    B. Hille, Ionic channels in excitable membranes. current problems and biophysical approaches, Biophysical jour- nal 22, 283 (1978)

    1978

  65. [74]

    Tyagi, G

    S. Tyagi, G. P. Higerd-Rusli, E. J. Akin, S. G. Wax- man, and S. D. Dib-Hajj, Sculpting excitable membranes: voltage-gated ion channel delivery and distribution, Na- ture Reviews Neuroscience , 1 (2025)

    2025

  66. [75]

    H. Row, J. B. Fernandes, K. K. Mandadapu, and K. Shekhar, Spatiotemporal dynamics of ionic reorgani- zation near biological membrane interfaces, Physical Re- view Research 7, 013185 (2025)

    2025

  67. [76]

    Bartolo, A

    D. Bartolo, A. Ajdari, J.-B. Fournier, and R. Golesta- nian, Fluctuations of fluctuation-induced casimir-like forces, Physical Review Letters 89, 230601 (2002)

    2002

  68. [77]

    K. Liu, B. Chu, J. Newby, E. L. Read, J. Lowengrub, and J. Allard, Hydrodynamics of transient cell-cell contact: The role of membrane permeability and active protru- sion length, PLOS Computational Biology 15, e1006352 (2019)

    2019

  69. [78]

    L. C.-l. Lin, J. T. Groves, and F. L. Brown, Analysis of shape, fluctuations, and dynamics in intermembrane junctions, Biophysical Journal 91, 3600 (2006)

    2006

  70. [79]

    A. F. Dos Santos and J. P. Friedmann Angeli, Organelle conversations drive ferroptosis, Nature Cell Biology , 1 (2025)

    2025

  71. [80]

    Bassereau, B

    P. Bassereau, B. Sorre, and A. L´ evy, Bending lipid mem- branes: Experiments after W. Helfrich’s model, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 208, 47 (2014), pub- lisher: Elsevier B.V

    2014

  72. [81]

    Aris, Vectors, Tensors, and the Basic Equations of Fluid Mechanics (Dover Publications, New York City, 1989)

    R. Aris, Vectors, Tensors, and the Basic Equations of Fluid Mechanics (Dover Publications, New York City, 1989)

    1989

  73. [82]

    Tsafrir, Y

    I. Tsafrir, Y. Caspi, M. A. Guedeau-Boudeville, T. Arzi, and J. Stavans, Budding and tubulation in highly oblate vesicles by anchored amphiphilic molecules, Physical Re- view Letters 91, 1 (2003)

    2003

  74. [83]

    M. E. Gurtin, E. Fried, and L. Anand, The mechanics and thermodynamics of continua (Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  75. [84]

    J. P. Boyd, Chebyshev and Fourier spectral methods (Courier Corporation, 2001)

    2001

  76. [85]

    W. M. Deen, Analysis of Transport Phenomena (Oxford University Press, 2011)

    2011

  77. [86]

    Lidmar, L

    J. Lidmar, L. Mirny, and D. R. Nelson, Virus shapes and buckling transitions in spherical shells, Physical Re- view E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Re- lated Interdisciplinary Topics 68, 1 (2003), arXiv: cond- mat/0306741

    2003

  78. [87]

    Doi and S

    M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics-Oxford University Press (Oxford University Press, 1988) pages: 391 Place: New York City

    1988

  79. [88]

    Doi, Onsager’s variational principle in soft matter, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 23, 10.1088/0953- 8984/23/28/284118 (2011)

    M. Doi, Onsager’s variational principle in soft matter, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 23, 10.1088/0953- 8984/23/28/284118 (2011)

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.