Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Role of non-reciprocity in spin-wave channeling

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Non-reciprocity defeats spin-wave channeling even when the stripe is aligned with the material's reciprocal direction.

desk verdict A solid experimental caution for the PSWS community: non-reciprocity leaks into supposedly reciprocal channeling, and the 1D analysis deserves suspicion. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.07401 v1 pith:INMHANIW submitted 2025-05-12 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Jean-Paul Adam , Nathalie Bardou , Aurélie Solignac , Joo-Von Kim , Thibaut Devolder This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall PACS 75.30.Ds75.70.Cn85.75.-d
keywords spinwavesnon-reciprocitysyntheticantiferromagnetBrillouinlightscatteringspin-wavechannelingpropagatingwavespectroscopyisofrequencycontoursmicromagneticsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether non-reciprocal waves can be guided in arbitrary directions. Using Brillouin light scattering microscopy and modeling, the authors study acoustic spin waves in a narrow stripe of a synthetic antiferromagnet, with the static field applied perpendicular to the stripe so that the stripe axis is the material's reciprocal direction. They find that the spin-wave response is nevertheless dominated by non-reciprocity: a line-shaped antenna excites waves with wavevectors perpendicular to the stripe, and energy flows along a tilted, caustic-like beam that does not follow the conduit. The explanation traces these effects to the shape of the acoustic-branch isofrequency contours and to non-uniform magnetization near the stripe edges that seeds high transverse wavevectors. If correct, the results invalidate the standard one-dimensional analysis of propagating spin wave spectroscopy for non-reciprocal materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the isofrequency contour $\omega_{\mathrm{ac}}(k_x,k_y)=\omega_{\mathrm{applied}}$ of the acoustic spin-wave branch, computed with a dynamical-matrix formalism that includes interlayer dipole-dipole coupling. At low frequencies the contour is an egg shape extending to large negative $k_x$; near the uniform-mode frequency it collapses to a line along the $k_x=-k_y$ diagonal; at higher frequencies it develops a protuberance that yields two distinct group-velocity directions. The analysis selects the wavevector space reachable by the antenna ($|k_y|<3$ rad/µm) and with group velocity directed away from the antenna ($\vec{\nabla}_{\vec{k}}\omega\cdot\hat{y}>0$). Within this window the direction of the group velocity determines where energy flows, while the large transverse wavevector components determine the nodal spacing of the interference pattern. The non-uniform equilibrium magnetization near the stripe edges is proposed as the source that seeds those high-$|k_x|$ waves.

What would settle it

Measure the wavevector distribution across the stripe width in the low-frequency regime (e.g., by wavevector-resolved or phase-resolved Brillouin light scattering): if no spin-wave components with $|k_x|\gtrsim 10$ rad/µm are detected, the edge-seeding mechanism is falsified. Alternatively, fabricate a stripe with deliberately modified edges (smoothed or ion-damaged) and check whether the transverse nodal pattern disappears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that non-reciprocity does not disappear when spin waves are guided along a direction in which the dispersion is symmetric. In a synthetic antiferromagnet stripe, the antenna excites acoustic spin waves whose wavevectors can run parallel to the antenna—perpendicular to the intended guiding direction—because the isofrequency contour at the driving frequency crosses the antenna's coupling window at large $|k_x|$. These waves share a common group velocity, leading to interference patterns with nodes transverse to the stripe at low frequencies and to a single tilted 'caustic-like' beam near the uniform-mode frequency, where the contour collapses to a line along the $k_x=-k_y$ diagonal. The authors show that a qualitative analysis based on the unbounded-film dispersion relation reproduces the main experimental features, and micromagnetic simulations—which include the non-uniform edge magnetization—match the images after convolution with the optical resolution, although discrepancies remain at intermediate frequencies. The paper concludes that wavevectors and group velocities are generally not collinear with the conduit, so models of spin-wave transport that assume a one-dimensional flow fail for strongly non-reciprocal materials.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's explanation relies on the untested claim that tiny regions near the stripe edges, where the equilibrium magnetization and demagnetizing fields are non-uniform, efficiently couple the antenna field to spin waves with transverse wavevectors up to roughly 25 rad/µm; the micromagnetic model itself fails at 8.4 GHz to reproduce the observed bidirectional beating, indicating that this edge coupling is not fully captured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Propagating spin wave spectroscopy on non-reciprocal materials cannot be reduced to a 1D model: wavevectors and group velocities are generally not collinear with the conduit, so spatial imaging is required to interpret the electrical response.
  • The standard method of extracting spin-wave attenuation lengths from the exponential decay of a signal along the stripe becomes unreliable whenever the energy flow is tilted away from the conduit axis.
  • A line-shaped antenna in a non-reciprocal medium can radiate energy in a narrow, caustic-like beam whose direction is set by the isofrequency contour, not by the antenna orientation—opening a design route for angle-selective spin-wave emitters.
  • For very narrow stripes (near 1 µm), the non-reciprocity is progressively lost and the response crosses over to the familiar reciprocal Damon-Eshbach regime with mode interference.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The transverse nodal patterns imply that in non-reciprocal waveguides, a single 'wavelength' measured along the conduit may actually be a superposition of the antenna's $k_y$ window and large $k_x$ components; phase-resolved imaging could disentangle these.
  • The same isofrequency-contour reasoning could predict off-axis emission in other non-reciprocal wave systems, such as DMI films or magnonic crystals, where the dispersion surface is tilted.
  • A direct experimental test of the edge-seeding hypothesis would be to modify the stripe edges (e.g., by smoothing, ion irradiation, or exchange-biasing) and observe whether the transverse nodal pattern disappears or shifts in frequency.
  • The caustic beam near the uniform-mode frequency is an energy-focusing effect that might be exploitable for microwave signal routing, but its direction depends on field and frequency, suggesting tunable beam steering in SAF conduits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates spin-wave propagation in narrow synthetic antiferromagnet (SAF) stripes, with the static field applied perpendicular to the stripe axis. The authors use Brillouin light scattering (BLS) microscopy and micromagnetic simulations to show that, even when the stripe (conduit) is aligned with the reciprocal direction of the material, non-reciprocal spin-wave dispersion produces unconventional propagation patterns: transverse nodal structures, tilted directional energy beams, and two-dimensional beating. The authors interpret these patterns using the unbounded-film dispersion relation and propose that non-uniform magnetizations near the stripe edges serve as sources of high-wavevector spin waves with wavevectors perpendicular to the conduit. They argue that these effects invalidate the one-dimensional analysis commonly used in propagating spin-wave spectroscopy (PSWS) of non-reciprocal materials.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, the results demonstrate a conceptual limitation of 1D PSWS models for non-reciprocal systems and reveal a new channeling behavior where line antennas can excite transverse high-k waves. The experimental dataset is substantial: BLS images at four applied fields and many frequencies, supplemented by micromagnetic simulations that reproduce the main features after optical convolution. Material parameters are taken from an independent VNA-FMR study, not fitted to the BLS images. The paper explicitly acknowledges uncertainties in the dispersion analysis for curved contours and the failure of the micromagnetic model at 8.4 GHz. The main weakness is that the proposed edge-seeding mechanism for high-kx waves is not directly measured, and the supporting simulation fails in a key frequency range.

major comments (3)
  1. [Physical understanding / Interpretation guidelines] The central claim that the x-uniform antenna field excites spin waves with large |kx| depends entirely on the assertion that "tiny regions near the stripe edges ... are likely" the sources (p.4). This is not directly demonstrated. The micromagnetic simulation, which includes these edge non-uniformities, fails at 8.4 GHz to reproduce the observed bidirectional beating (Fig. 4(c)), as stated in the Discussion. This inconsistency leaves the edge-seeding mechanism as a hypothesis rather than an established mechanism. To strengthen the claim, the authors should either measure the kx content directly (e.g., by wavevector-resolved BLS or by spatial Fourier analysis of the BLS images) or perform a control simulation with artificially uniform edges.
  2. [Dispersion relations / Fig. 3] The inference of large negative kx (e.g., -25 rad/µm at 4 GHz, p.5) from nodal spacings uses the unbounded-film dispersion relation, but the experimental BLS set-up has a collection limit of k_BLS_max = 18 rad/µm (Methods). Spatial frequencies above this limit cannot be imaged, so the observed BLS patterns cannot confirm modes with |kx| > 18 rad/µm. The authors should clarify how modes with -25 rad/µm contribute to the BLS image, and whether the apparent secondary maximum at the bottom right corner could be due to edge reflections or other lower-kx modes.
  3. [Qualitative understanding / Discussion] The paper claims that the 1D PSWS model is invalid for non-reciprocal materials, but the evidence for the coexistence of multiple kx modes is qualitative. To make this claim quantitatively load-bearing, the authors should compare the measured spatial profiles with the predictions of the 1D model (which assumes only ky propagation) and show directly that the discrepancy arises from the transverse components. A quantitative measure, such as the spectral weight at kx versus ky in the spatial Fourier transform of the BLS images, would substantiate the central claim and would also help quantify the transduction efficiency of the proposed edge sources.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2] The logarithmic color scale is not defined in the caption, and the stripe edges are not marked on all panels, making it difficult to assess the confinement of the BLS signal.
  2. [Fig. 3(b)-(e)] The group-velocity arrows are drawn schematically; the caption should indicate whether they are computed from the dispersion relation or only illustrative.
  3. [Eq. (1) and surrounding text] The interval notation "[-k_max_y,ant, -k_max_y,ant]" appears to have a sign error; this should presumably be "[-k_max_y,ant, +k_max_y,ant]."
  4. [Introduction / Fig. 1(c)] The term "scissors state" is used without definition; a brief description of the equilibrium configuration would help readers unfamiliar with SAFs.
  5. [Fig. 2(a)] The statement that the BLS amplitude is maximal near the left edge of the antenna is not clearly illustrated because the antenna position is not drawn on the images; adding a schematic of the antenna would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: material parameters come from independent VNA-FMR fits; model predictions are compared against new BLS data and are falsifiable.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The material parameters (Ms, A, J, alpha) are taken from prior VNA-FMR characterization of the unpatterned SAF (ref. 30), an independent measurement that does not use the BLS images presented here. The dispersion relation is computed in the paper via the dynamical-matrix formalism with dipole-dipole interactions (refs 33-35), and the non-reciprocity is also demonstrated by the paper's own Fig. 3, so citations to refs 22 and 36 are not load-bearing circular steps. The interpretation guideline Eq. (1) is a physically motivated filter (group velocity toward the detector) rather than a fit. Quantitative comparisons, such as the predicted node spacing delta_x = 2*pi/|k_x| using k_x values read from the computed dispersion at the drive frequency, are non-trivial predictions tested against experimental BLS images. The micromagnetic simulations use the same independently determined parameters and reproduce most experimental patterns, while the acknowledged failure at 8.4 GHz (Fig. 4c, 'the micromagnetic simulation fails to reproduce the bidirectional beating pattern observed experimentally') demonstrates that the model is falsifiable rather than tuned to the data. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in by citation. The only self-citations are to independent measurements and previously established mode properties; they do not reduce the paper's claims to their inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on material parameters fitted in a prior study by the same group, on the standard micromagnetic LLG formalism, and on an asserted but unmeasured edge-nonuniformity source for high-k_x waves. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Saturation magnetization Ms = 1.35 MA/m
    Fitted from VNA-FMR of unpatterned SAF in ref. 30; used as input to dispersion and mumax3 simulations.
  • Exchange stiffness A = 16 pJ/m
    Same fit as above.
  • Interlayer exchange coupling J = -1.0 mJ/m^2
    Same fit as above.
  • Gilbert damping alpha = 0.011
    Same fit as above; influences attenuation lengths in micromagnetic steady-state response.
  • Antenna rf field amplitude = 1 mT
    Chosen peak field at SAF surface under middle of antenna for simulations; arbitrary normalization since BLS comparison is qualitative.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The unbounded-film dispersion relation omega_ac(k_x,k_y) describes spin waves in the 5 micron stripe, and waves with group velocity pointing above the antenna (Eq. 1) dominate the BLS pattern.
    This is the core interpretive filter; explicitly acknowledged as approximate, missing demagnetizing fields and optical-acoustic hybridization.
  • domain assumption The BLS intensity is proportional to the time-integrated square of the out-of-plane dynamic magnetization m_z (Eq. 2).
    Standard magneto-optical assumption, justified by ref. 32; affects the mapping between simulations and images.
  • ad hoc to paper The ground state is the scissors state with edge magnetization tilt that acts as a source of high-k_x waves.
    Introduced to explain transverse nodes; not independently verified.
  • standard math The antenna field is calculated from the real geometry using Eqs. A1-A4 of ref. 22, giving |k_y| < 3 rad/micrometer coupling.
    Modeling of the antenna excitation; standard electrodynamic formula.
  • domain assumption Optical spin waves are not excited because the antenna rf field is perpendicular to the applied field and optical modes lie at higher frequencies (Figs. 5 and 6).
    Verified by BLS spectra at a fixed position; justifies considering only the acoustic branch.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Role of non-reciprocity in spin-wave channeling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/INMHANIW

@misc{pith2026250507401,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Role of non-reciprocity in spin-wave channeling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/INMHANIW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.07401}
}
read the original abstract

The extent to which non-reciprocal waves can be guided in arbitrary directions is an interesting question. We address one aspect of this problem by studying the propagation of acoustic spin waves in a narrow physical conduit made of a synthetic antiferromagnet. Through a combination of Brillouin Light Scattering microscopy and modeling, we demonstrate that even when attempting to guide waves in the reciprocal direction of the material, the system still exhibits strong signatures of non-reciprocity. This includes the excitation of high wavevector waves in the direction perpendicular to the intended channeling, as well as energy transfer in directions that often neither aligns with the physical conduit nor with the symmetry axes of the magnetic properties. These findings have implications for the modeling of propagating wave spectroscopy in non-reciprocal materials and their potential applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.07401 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Experimental BLS images (logarithmic color scale) taken at an applied field of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dispersion relations of the acoustic spin waves in an infinitely extended SAF film at a field of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Micromagnetic simulations of the BLS images for an infinite lateral resolution (Eq. 2, logarithmic color scale) and after convolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Microfocused BLS spectra recorded at a fixed position at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Dispersion relations of the optical spin waves in an infinitely [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Micromagnetic simulations of the BLS images after convolution with a Gaussian filter reducing the lateral resolution to 350 nm. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Micromagnetic simulations of the BLS images for a stripe widths of 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Caloz, A

    C. Caloz, A. Al `u, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, and Z.- L. Deck-L ´eger, Electromagnetic Nonreciprocity, Physical Re- view Applied10, 047001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    R. E. Camley, T. S. Rahman, and D. L. Mills, Theory of light scattering by the spin-wave excitations of thin ferromagnetic films, Physical Review B23, 1226 (1981)

    work page 1981

  3. [3]

    Cort ´es-Ortu˜no and P

    D. Cort ´es-Ortu˜no and P. Landeros, Influence of the Dzyaloshin- skii–Moriya interaction on the spin-wave spectra of thin films, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter25, 156001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Belmeguenai, J.-P

    M. Belmeguenai, J.-P. Adam, Y . Roussign ´e, S. Eimer, T. De- volder, J.-V . Kim, S. M. Cherif, A. Stashkevich, and A. Thiav- ille, Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in perpendic- ularly magnetized Pt/Co/AlOx ultrathin films measured by Bril- louin light spectroscopy, Physical Review B91, 180405 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Thiancourt, S

    G. Thiancourt, S. Ngom, N. Bardou, and T. Devolder, Unidirec- tional spin waves measured using propagating-spin-wave spec- troscopy, Physical Review Applied22, 034040 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Verba, I

    R. Verba, I. Lisenkov, I. Krivorotov, V . Tiberkevich, and A. Slavin, Nonreciprocal Surface Acoustic Waves in Multilay- ers with Magnetoelastic and Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interactions, Physical Review Applied9, 064014 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    K ¨uß, S

    M. K ¨uß, S. Glamsch, A. H ¨orner, and M. Albrecht, Wide-Band Nonreciprocal Transmission of Surface Acoustic Waves in Syn- thetic Antiferromagnets, ACS Applied Electronic Materials , acsaelm.3c01709 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    K. Di, S. X. Feng, S. N. Piramanayagam, V . L. Zhang, H. S. Lim, S. C. Ng, and M. H. Kuok, Enhancement of spin-wave nonreciprocity in magnonic crystals via synthetic antiferromag- netic coupling, Scientific Reports5, 10153 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Gladii, M

    O. Gladii, M. Haidar, Y . Henry, M. Kostylev, and M. Bailleul, Frequency nonreciprocity of surface spin wave in permalloy thin films, Physical Review B93, 054430 (2016), publisher: American Physical Society

    2016

  2. [10]

    Gallardo, T

    R. Gallardo, T. Schneider, A. Chaurasiya, A. Oelschl ¨agel, S. Arekapudi, A. Rold ´an-Molina, R. H ¨ubner, K. Lenz, A. Bar- man, J. Fassbender, J. Lindner, O. Hellwig, and P. Landeros, Reconfigurable Spin-Wave Nonreciprocity Induced by Dipolar Interaction in a Coupled Ferromag...

    2019

  3. [11]

    R. A. Gallardo, P. Alvarado-Seguel, A. K ´akay, J. Lindner, and P. Landeros, Spin-wave focusing induced by dipole-dipole in- teraction in synthetic antiferromagnets, Physical Review B104, 174417 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Matsumoto, T

    H. Matsumoto, T. Kawada, M. Ishibashi, M. Kawaguchi, and M. Hayashi, Large surface acoustic wave nonreciprocity in syn- thetic antiferromagnets, Applied Physics Express15, 063003 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Mruczkiewicz and M

    M. Mruczkiewicz and M. Krawczyk, Influence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction on the FMR spectrum of magnonic crystals and confined structures, Physical Review B 94, 024434 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    B. W. Zingsem, M. Farle, R. L. Stamps, and R. E. Camley, Un- usual nature of confined modes in a chiral system: Directional transport in standing waves, Physical Review B99, 214429 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Silvani, M

    R. Silvani, M. Alunni, S. Tacchi, and G. Carlotti, Effect of the Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya Interaction on the Spin Waves Eigenmodes of Isolated Stripes and Dots Magnetized In-Plane: A Micromagnetic Study, Applied Sciences11, 2929 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Tacchi, R

    S. Tacchi, R. Silvani, M. Kuepferling, A. Fern ´andez Scari- oni, S. Sievers, H. W. Schumacher, E. Darwin, M.-A. Syskaki, G. Jakob, M. Kl ¨aui, and G. Carlotti, Suppression of spin-wave nonreciprocity due to interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya inter- action by lateral confinemen...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Makartsou, M

    U. Makartsou, M. Golebiewski, U. Guzowska, A. Stognij, R. Gieniusz, and M. Krawczyk, Spin-wave self-imaging: Ex- perimental and numerical demonstration of caustic and Talbot- like diffraction patterns, Applied Physics Letters124, 192406 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    H. S. K ¨orner, J. Stigloher, and C. H. Back, Excitation and tailor- ing of diffractive spin-wave beams in NiFe using nonuniform microwave antennas, Physical Review B96, 100401 (2017), publisher: American Physical Society

    2017

  11. [19]

    E. H. Lock, The properties of isofrequency dependences and the laws of geometrical optics, Physics-Uspekhi51, 375 (2008), publisher: IOP Publishing

    2008

  12. [20]

    Bailleul, D

    M. Bailleul, D. Olligs, and C. Fermon, Propagating spin wave spectroscopy in a permalloy film: A quantitative analysis, Ap- plied Physics Letters83, 972 (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    V . E. Demidov, S. O. Demokritov, K. Rott, P. Krzysteczko, and G. Reiss, Mode interference and periodic self-focusing of spin waves in permalloy microstripes, Physical Review B77, 064406 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Devolder, Propagating-spin-wave spectroscopy using induc- tive antennas: Conditions for unidirectional energy flow, Phys- ical Review Applied20, 054057 (2023)

    T. Devolder, Propagating-spin-wave spectroscopy using induc- tive antennas: Conditions for unidirectional energy flow, Phys- ical Review Applied20, 054057 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Pirro, T

    P. Pirro, T. Br ¨acher, A. V . Chumak, B. L ¨agel, C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, P. G¨ornert, B. Leven, and B. Hillebrands, Spin- wave excitation and propagation in microstructured waveguides of yttrium iron garnet/Pt bilayers, Applied Physics Letters104, 012402 (2014). 9

    2014

  16. [24]

    V . E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, R. Liu, B. Divinskiy, A. Tele- gin, and S. O. Demokritov, Excitation of coherent propagating spin waves by pure spin currents, Nature Communications7, 1 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Bayer, J

    C. Bayer, J. Jorzick, S. O. Demokritov, A. N. Slavin, K. Y . Gus- lienko, D. V . Berkov, N. L. Gorn, M. P. Kostylev, and B. Hille- brands, Spin-Wave Excitations in Finite Rectangular Elements, inSpin Dynamics in Confined Magnetic Structures III, edited by B. Hillebrands and A....

    2006

  18. [26]

    K. Y . Guslienko, S. O. Demokritov, B. Hillebrands, and A. N. Slavin, Effective dipolar boundary conditions for dynamic mag- netization in thin magnetic stripes, Physical Review B66, 132402 (2002)

    2002

  19. [27]

    V . E. Demidov and S. O. Demokritov, Magnonic Waveguides Studied by Microfocus Brillouin Light Scattering, IEEE Trans- actions on Magnetics51, 1 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Talmelli, T

    G. Talmelli, T. Devolder, N. Tr ¨ager, J. F ¨orster, S. Wintz, M. Weigand, H. Stoll, M. Heyns, G. Sch¨utz, I. P. Radu, J. Gr¨afe, F. Ciubotaru, and C. Adelmann, Reconfigurable submicrome- ter spin-wave majority gate with electrical transducers, Science Advances6, eabb4042 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Shiota, T

    Y . Shiota, T. Taniguchi, M. Ishibashi, T. Moriyama, and T. Ono, Tunable Magnon-Magnon Coupling Mediated by Dynamic Dipolar Interaction in Synthetic Antiferromagnets, Physical Re- view Letters125, 017203 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Mouhoub, F

    A. Mouhoub, F. Millo, C. Chappert, J.-V . Kim, J. L ´etang, A. Solignac, and T. Devolder, Exchange energies in CoFeB/Ru/CoFeB synthetic antiferromagnets, Physical Review Materials7, 044404 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia- Sanchez, and B. V . Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Advances4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Hamrle, J

    J. Hamrle, J. Pi ˇstora, B. Hillebrands, B. Lenk, and M. M ¨unzenberg, Analytical expression of the magneto-optical Kerr effect and Brillouin light scattering intensity arising from dynamic magnetization, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 43, 325004 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    F. C. N ¨ortemann, R. L. Stamps, and R. E. Camley, Microscopic calculation of spin waves in antiferromagnetically coupled mul- tilayers: Nonreciprocity and finite-size effects, Physical Review B47, 11910 (1993)

    1993

  26. [34]

    Grimsditch, L

    M. Grimsditch, L. Giovannini, F. Montoncello, F. Nizzoli, G. K. Leaf, and H. G. Kaper, Magnetic normal modes in ferromag- netic nanoparticles: A dynamical matrix approach, Physical Re- view B70, 054409 (2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    Henry, O

    Y . Henry, O. Gladii, and M. Bailleul, Propagating spin-wave normal modes: A dynamic matrix approach using plane- wave demagnetizating tensors, arXiv:1611.06153 [cond-mat] (2016), arXiv: 1611.06153

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Millo, J.-P

    F. Millo, J.-P. Adam, C. Chappert, J.-V . Kim, A. Mouhoub, A. Solignac, and T. Devolder, Unidirectionality of spin waves in synthetic antiferromagnets, Physical Review Applied20, 054051 (2023). 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 frequency [GHz] 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 BLS intensity [arb. uni...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.