Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.08652 v1 pith:XXEIYGLQ submitted 2025-05-13 cs.CR

Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Systems

classification cs.CR
keywords blockchainmanagementsystemsdatadatabasenodesprinciplestechnology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Blockchain is a type of decentralized distributed database. Unlike traditional relational database management systems, it does not require management or maintenance by a third party. All data management and update processes are open and transparent, solving the trust issues of centralized database management systems. Blockchain ensures network-wide consistency, consensus, traceability, and immutability. Under the premise of mutual distrust between nodes, blockchain technology integrates various technologies, such as P2P protocols, asymmetric encryption, consensus mechanisms, and chain structures. Data is distributed and stored across multiple nodes, maintained by all nodes, ensuring transaction data integrity, undeniability, and security. This facilitates trusted information sharing and supervision. The basic principles of blockchain form the foundation for all related research. Understanding the working principles is essential for further study of blockchain technology. There are many platforms based on blockchain technology, and they differ from one another. This paper will analyze the architecture of blockchain systems at each layer, focusing on the principles and technologies of blockchain platforms such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Hyperledger Fabric. The analysis will cover their scalability and security and highlight their similarities, differences, advantages, and disadvantages.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CKG-LLM: LLM-Assisted Detection of Smart Contract Access Control Vulnerabilities Based on Knowledge Graphs

    cs.CR 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CKG-LLM uses LLMs to generate executable queries over contract knowledge graphs for detecting access control vulnerabilities and reports superior performance versus existing tools.

  2. Securing High-Concurrency Ticket Sales: A Framework Based on Microservice

    cs.SE 2025-12 reject novelty 2.0

    A railway ticketing system built from standard Spring Cloud components is reported to reach 817 req/s on a train-query interface, but only under a 100-thread local VM test with inconsistent purchase-interface data.

  3. A Comprehensive Evaluation and Practice of System Penetration Testing

    cs.CR 2025-10 conditional novelty 2.0

    A survey-style paper that proposes a weighted tool-scoring rubric, then demonstrates routine host and web penetration tests on vulnerable virtual machines.