REVIEW 2 cited by
How to Incorporate External Fields in Analog Ising Machines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Ising machines (IMs) are specialized devices designed to efficiently solve combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). They consist of artificial spins that evolve towards a low-energy configuration representing a problem's solution. Most realistic COPs require both spin-spin couplings and external fields. In IMs with analog spins, these interactions scale differently with the continuous spin amplitudes, leading to imbalances that affect performance. Various techniques have been proposed to mitigate this issue, but their performance has not been benchmarked. We address this gap through a numerical analysis. We evaluate the time-to-solution of these methods across three distinct problem classes with up to 500 spins. Our results show that the most effective way to incorporate external fields is through an approach where the spin interactions are proportional to the spin signs, rather than their continuous amplitudes.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A More Convex Ising Formulation of Max-3-Cut Using Higher-Order Spin Interactions
A four-spin Ising formulation for Max-3-Cut removes the energy barriers of one-hot encoding and is about 2.75x faster than a rescaled quadratic baseline on an analog Ising simulator.
-
How to Incorporate Higher-order Interactions in Analog Ising Machines
On 3-SAT benchmarks, analog Ising machines with sign-based spin interactions outperform amplitude-rescaling methods in time-to-solution and success rate.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.