pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.08942 · v3 · pith:OYOGMNYVnew · submitted 2025-05-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · nlin.CD· physics.bio-ph

Effective synchronization amid noise-induced chaos

Benjamin Sorkin , Thomas A. Witten This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 15:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech nlin.CDphysics.bio-ph
keywords noise-induced synchronizationchaotic phase dynamicseffective phase estimationstochastic forcingremote clock coordinationstatistical independencestrong noise regime
0
0 comments X

The pith

Clocks driven by strong common noise achieve effective synchronization by losing memory of initial phases and allowing phase estimation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines two remote clocks exposed to the same strong random forcing that makes their phase differences evolve chaotically. It demonstrates that the relative phases nevertheless become independent of starting conditions after a characteristic time, so the clocks are effectively equivalent. An agent can then compute an estimate of the effective phase that matches the other clock's phase closely. This practical synchronization holds even though conventional noise-induced locking fails under strong forcing. The finding points to coordination methods usable when agents share only environmental noise.

Core claim

Under strong disruptive noise the relative phases of the two clocks vary erratically yet become statistically independent of initial conditions after a well-defined timescale, so that one agent can estimate an effective phase that closely agrees with the phase of the other agent.

What carries the argument

Statistical independence of relative phases from initial conditions under shared stochastic forcing, which enables phase estimation.

If this is right

  • Synchronization remains attainable for stronger environmental forcing than the conventional noise-induced regime allows.
  • Distant agents can coordinate actions by estimating each other's phase without exchanging signals.
  • The time to reach statistical independence sets a practical limit on how quickly the clocks become usable for joint tasks.
  • The same mechanism could operate in living systems that share fluctuating external conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar effective synchronization might appear in other driven chaotic oscillators when they share a common random drive.
  • Testing the result with measured biological noise spectra would check whether the simple noise model captures real environments.
  • The estimated phase could serve as a shared reference for timing decisions in distributed systems.

Load-bearing premise

The demonstration uses one particular simple model of strong disruptive noise.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that relative phases under different initial conditions remain correlated for arbitrarily long times under the same noise would falsify the independence claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.08942 by Benjamin Sorkin, Thomas A. Witten.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of a phase map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. A sequence of two, initially-different phase distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Kullback-Leibler divergences (KLDs) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The average Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLDs) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: in Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) A density plot of the rescaled discrepancy, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Trajectories from the dynamical system of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Phase lags from the dynamical system of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Two phase distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. A sequence of two, initially-identical phase distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Kullback-Leibler divergences (KLDs) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Illustration of the kernel-density estimation method. Here [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. A scatter plot of deviations in the fiducial phases of each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Two remote agents with synchronized clocks may use them to act in concert and communicate. This necessitates some means of creating and maintaining synchrony. One method, not requiring any direct interaction between the agents, is to expose them to a common, environmental, stochastic forcing. This "noise-induced synchronization" only occurs under sufficiently mild forcing; stronger forcing disrupts synchronization. We investigate the regime of strong noise, where the clocks' relative phases evolve chaotically. Using a simple realization of disruptive noise, we demonstrate effective synchronization. First, although the relative phases of the two clocks varied erratically, we confirm that they became statistically independent of initial conditions and hence equivalent after a well-defined timescale. Second, we show that an agent can estimate an effective phase that closely agrees with the other's phase. Thus, synchronization is practically attainable beyond the regime of conventional noise-induced synchronization. We finally discuss how it might be used in living systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates synchronization of remote clocks under common environmental stochastic forcing. In the strong-noise regime where relative phases evolve chaotically, it claims that the phases nevertheless become statistically independent of initial conditions after a finite timescale and that one agent can estimate an effective phase that agrees with the other agent's phase. The demonstration uses a simple realization of disruptive noise and discusses possible relevance to living systems.

Significance. If the statistical forgetting and phase estimability are shown to be robust properties of strong common forcing rather than artifacts of one noise process, the result would meaningfully extend noise-induced synchronization beyond the conventional mild-forcing regime. The concrete numerical demonstration for the chosen model is a strength, but the absence of generality checks limits the immediate impact.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical demonstration of chaotic relative-phase evolution] The central demonstration (described in the abstract and the main numerical section) relies exclusively on one specific realization of disruptive noise. No analytic derivation is given showing that statistical independence of initial conditions follows from general properties of strong forcing, and no additional simulations with qualitatively different noise (different correlation structure, amplitude distribution, or non-Gaussian statistics) are reported. Because the claim is framed for the regime of strong noise in general, this specificity is load-bearing and must be addressed to support the conclusion that effective synchronization is attainable beyond conventional noise-induced synchronization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that phases 'became statistically independent of initial conditions and hence equivalent after a well-defined timescale' but provides no quantitative measure of that timescale or error bars on the independence test; adding these details would improve clarity.
  2. [Agent phase estimation] Notation for the effective phase estimated by the agent should be introduced explicitly when first used, and the agreement metric (e.g., mean phase difference or correlation) should be defined in the text rather than left implicit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. We address the major comment on the specificity of the noise realization below and describe planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central demonstration (described in the abstract and the main numerical section) relies exclusively on one specific realization of disruptive noise. No analytic derivation is given showing that statistical independence of initial conditions follows from general properties of strong forcing, and no additional simulations with qualitatively different noise (different correlation structure, amplitude distribution, or non-Gaussian statistics) are reported. Because the claim is framed for the regime of strong noise in general, this specificity is load-bearing and must be addressed to support the conclusion that effective synchronization is attainable beyond conventional noise-induced synchronization.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the central demonstration relies on one specific realization of disruptive noise, as described in the methods. We do not provide an analytic derivation showing statistical independence from general properties of strong forcing, as this would require a broader theoretical framework outside the scope of the present numerical study. To address the concern about robustness, we will add in the revised manuscript additional simulations using qualitatively different noise processes, including altered correlation structures, different amplitude distributions, and non-Gaussian statistics. These results will test whether the observed statistical independence of initial conditions after a finite timescale and the estimability of an effective phase remain valid beyond the original noise model. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Analytic derivation showing that statistical independence of initial conditions follows from general properties of strong forcing

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on direct numerical demonstration for a specific noise model

full rationale

The paper presents a demonstration of statistical independence of relative phases from initial conditions and effective phase estimation under one chosen disruptive noise process. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no self-citation chain justifies the central result, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is imported from prior author work to force the outcome. The derivation chain consists of explicit simulation and statistical checks on the chosen model rather than tautological re-expression of inputs. This is the expected honest outcome for a demonstration paper whose scope is limited to one realization.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; claims rest on standard modeling of phase oscillators under common stochastic forcing.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Clocks are modeled as phase oscillators subject to common environmental stochastic forcing.
    Implicit in the description of noise-induced synchronization and chaotic relative phases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5684 in / 1047 out tokens · 45393 ms · 2026-05-22T15:05:15.866723+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    multi-peaked

    We takeD(A∥B)→0to mean that the two distributions have converged and become equivalent. Pursuing this evidence that all agents become statistically equivalent, we show in Sec. IV that each agent may define an effective phase that agrees closely with that of the other agent. This is possible in spite of the agents’ current phases differ- ing widely. This a...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    These misidentifications were an important factor in our choice of smoothing widthσ=e S

    We anticipate that any remaining largeφ f’s could be made insignificant. These misidentifications were an important factor in our choice of smoothing widthσ=e S. Indeed, when we used σ=e S/N(rather thanσ=e S of Sec. IV A) as a band- width, there were791misidentified points (8%), which have occurred with distributions of entropies as a low asS=−14; see Fig...

    work page

  3. [3]

    J. C. Dunlap, Molecular bases for circadian clocks, Cell96, 271 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Liao and M

    Y . Liao and M. J. Rust, The circadian clock ensures successful DNA replication in cyanobacteria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2022516118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Banfalvi,Cell Cycle Synchronization, 2nd ed., Methods in Molecular Biology (Springer, New York, 2017)

    G. Banfalvi,Cell Cycle Synchronization, 2nd ed., Methods in Molecular Biology (Springer, New York, 2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Rieke, D

    F. Rieke, D. Warland, R. R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, and W. Bialek,Spikes: Exploring the neural code(MIT Press, 1997)

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    Z. F. Mainen and T. J. Sejnowski, Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons, Science268, 1503 (1995)

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    R. R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, G. D. Lewen, S. P. Strong, R. Koberle, and W. Bialek, Reproducibility and variability in neural spike trains, Science275, 1805 (1997)

    work page 1997

  9. [9]

    Y . Penn, M. Segal, and E. Moses, Network synchronization in hippocampal neurons, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA113, 3341 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    K. H. Srivastava, C. M. Holmes, M. Vellema, A. R. Pack, C. P. H. Elemans, I. Nemenman, and S. J. Sober, Motor con- trol by precisely timed spike patterns, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 1171 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    S. J. Sober, S. Sponberg, I. Nemenman, and L. H. Ting, Mil- lisecond spike timing codes for motor control, Trends Neurosci. 41, 644 (2018), special Issue: Time in the Brain

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Trolier-McKinstry, S

    S. Trolier-McKinstry, S. Zhang, A. J. Bell, and X. Tan, High- performance piezoelectric crystals, ceramics, and films, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.48, 191 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Strogatz,Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order (Penguin UK, 2004)

    S. Strogatz,Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order (Penguin UK, 2004)

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    Pikovsky, M

    A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths,Synchronization: a universal concept in nonlinear sciences, V ol. 12 (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    D. J. T. Sumpter, The principles of collective animal behaviour, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B361, 5 (2006)

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    Arenas, A

    A. Arenas, A. D´ıaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y . Moreno, and C. Zhou, Synchronization in complex networks, Phys. Rep.469, 93 (2008)

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Pikovsky, Synchronization and stochastization of array of self-excited oscillators by external noise, Radiophys

    A. Pikovsky, Synchronization and stochastization of array of self-excited oscillators by external noise, Radiophys. Quantum 17 Electron27, 390 (1984)

    work page 1984

  18. [18]

    A. S. Pikovsky and J. Kurths, Coherence resonance in a noise- driven excitable system, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 775 (1997)

    work page 1997

  19. [19]

    R. V . Jensen, Synchronization of randomly driven nonlinear os- cillators, Phys. Rev. E58, R6907 (1998)

    work page 1998

  20. [20]

    Teramae and D

    J. Teramae and D. Tanaka, Robustness of the noise-induced phase synchronization in a general class of limit cycle oscil- lators, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 204103 (2004)

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    D. S. Goldobin and A. Pikovsky, Synchronization and desyn- chronization of self-sustained oscillators by common noise, Phys. Rev. E71, 045201 (2005)

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    Nakao, K

    H. Nakao, K. Arai, and Y . Kawamura, Noise-induced synchro- nization and clustering in ensembles of uncoupled limit-cycle oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 184101 (2007)

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Nagai and H

    K. Nagai and H. Nakao, Experimental synchronization of cir- cuit oscillations induced by common telegraph noise, Phys. Rev. E79, 036205 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    Nakao, K

    H. Nakao, K. Arai, K. Nagai, Y . Tsubo, and Y . Kuramoto, Syn- chrony of limit-cycle oscillators induced by random external impulses, Phys. Rev. E72, 026220 (2005)

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    J. A. Eaton, B. Moths, and T. A. Witten, Criterion for noise- induced synchronization: Application to colloidal alignment, Phys. Rev. E94, 032207 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Song and T

    Y . Song and T. A. Witten, Stochastic synchronization induced by noise, Phys. Rev. E106, 044207 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Yamamoto, I

    T. Yamamoto, I. Oowada, H. Yip, A. Uchida, S. Yoshi- mori, K. Yoshimura, J. Muramatsu, S. Goto, and P. Davis, Common-chaotic-signal induced synchronization in semicon- ductor lasers, Opt. Express15, 3974 (2007)

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    Schmolke and E

    F. Schmolke and E. Lutz, Noise-induced quantum synchroniza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 250601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Z. Tao, F. Schmolke, C.-K. Hu, W. Huang, Y . Zhou, J. Zhang, J. Chu, L. Zhang, X. Sun, Z. Guo, J. Niu, W. Weng, S. Liu, Y . Zhong, D. Tan, D. Yu, and E. Lutz, Noise-induced quantum synchronization with entangled oscillations, Nat. Commun.16, 8457 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    T. Zhou, L. Chen, and K. Aihara, Molecular communication through stochastic synchronization induced by extracellular fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 178103 (2005)

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Buzzi, Exponential decay of correlations for random Lasota– Yorke maps, Commun

    J. Buzzi, Exponential decay of correlations for random Lasota– Yorke maps, Commun. Math. Phys.208, 25 (1999)

    work page 1999

  32. [32]

    Gupta, W

    C. Gupta, W. Ott, and A. T ¨or¨ok, Memory loss for time- dependent piecewise expanding systems in higher dimension, Math. Res. Lett.20, 141 (2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Froyland, C

    G. Froyland, C. Gonz ´alez-Tokman, and A. Quas, Stability and approximation of random invariant densities for Lasota–Yorke map cocycles, Nonlinearity27, 647 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Froyland, C

    G. Froyland, C. Gonza ´lez-Tokman, and R. Murray, Quenched stochastic stability for eventually expanding-on-average ran- dom interval map cocycles, Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst.39, 2769–2792 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    V . I. Arnold,Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 1978)

    work page 1978

  36. [36]

    S. B. S. Khalsa, M. E. Jewett, C. Cajochen, and C. A. Czeisler, A phase response curve to single bright light pulses in human subjects, J. Physiol.549, 945 (2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    N. W. Schultheiss, A. A. Prinz, and R. J. Butera, eds.,Phase Response Curves in Neuroscience, Springer Series in Compu- tational Neuroscience (Springer, New York, 2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    S. Hata, T. Shimokawa, K. Arai, and H. Nakao, Synchroniza- tion of uncoupled oscillators by common gamma impulses: From phase locking to noise-induced synchronization, Phys. Rev. E82, 036206 (2010)

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas,Elements of information theory, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Interscience, 2006)

    work page 2006

  40. [40]

    Q. Wang, S. R. Kulkarni, and S. Verdu, Divergence estima- tion for multidimensional densities viak-nearest-neighbor dis- tances, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory55, 2392 (2009)

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    J. D. Victor, Binless strategies for estimation of information from neural data, Phys. Rev. E66, 051903 (2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [42]

    Arnold,Random Dynamical Systems, 2nd ed

    L. Arnold,Random Dynamical Systems, 2nd ed. (Springer, 2003)

    work page 2003

  43. [43]

    D. A. Levin, Y . Peres, and E. Wilmer,Markov Chains and Mix- ing Times, 2nd ed. (American Mathematical Society, 2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    B. W. Silverman,Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis(Chapman & Hall, 1986)

    work page 1986

  45. [45]

    B. U. Park and J. S. Marron, Comparison of data-driven band- width selectors, J. Am. Statist. Ass.85, 66 (1990)

    work page 1990

  46. [46]

    S. J. Sheather and M. C. Jones, A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation, J. R. Statist. Soc. B53, 683 (1991)

    work page 1991

  47. [47]

    B. W. Silverman, Using kernel density estimates to investigate multimodality, J. R. Statist. Soc. B43, 97 (1981)

    work page 1981

  48. [48]

    Mammen, J

    E. Mammen, J. S. Marron, and N. I. Fisher, Some asymp- totics for multimodality tests based on kernel density estimates, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields91, 115 (1992)

    work page 1992

  49. [49]

    Vincent and Y

    P. Vincent and Y . Bengio, Manifold parzen windows, inAd- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, V ol. 15, edited by S. Becker, S. Thrun, and K. Obermayer (MIT Press,

    work page

  50. [50]

    M ´esz´aros, J

    A. M ´esz´aros, J. F. Schumann, J. Alonso-Mora, A. Zgonnikov, and J. Kober, Rome: Robust multi-modal density estimator, in Proc. 33rd Int. Jt. Conf. on Artif. Intell, edited by K. Larson (International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Or- ganization, 2024) pp. 4751–4759

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Marsiglietti and V

    A. Marsiglietti and V . Kostina, A lower bound on the differen- tial entropy of log-concave random vectors with applications, Entropy20, 185 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    C. Zhou, J. Kurths, I. Z. Kiss, and J. L. Hudson, Noise-enhanced phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 014101 (2002)

    work page 2002

  53. [53]

    Z. G. Nicolaou, M. Sebek, I. Z. Kiss, and A. E. Motter, Coher- ent dynamics enhanced by uncorrelated noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 094101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    J. C. Pang, L. L. Gollo, and J. A. Roberts, Stochastic synchro- nization of dynamics on the human connectome, NeuroImage 229, 117738 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    E. R. Bittner and B. Tyagi, Noise-induced synchronization in coupled quantum oscillators, J. Chem. Phys.162, 104116 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Marder and D

    E. Marder and D. Bucher, Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements, Curr. Biol.11, R986 (2001)

    work page 2001

  57. [57]

    Yuste, J

    R. Yuste, J. N. MacLean, J. Smith, and A. Lansner, The cortex as a central pattern generator, Nat. Rev. Neurosci.6, 477 (2005)

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    Gilpin, Cryptographic hashing using chaotic hydrodynam- ics, Proc

    W. Gilpin, Cryptographic hashing using chaotic hydrodynam- ics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 4869 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Argyris, D

    A. Argyris, D. Syvridis, L. Larger, V . Annovazzi-Lodi, P. Co- let, I. Fischer, J. Garc ´ıa-Ojalvo, C. R. Mirasso, L. Pesquera, and K. A. Shore, Chaos-based communications at high bit rates using commercial fibre-optic links, Nature438, 343 (2005)

    work page 2005

  60. [60]

    Choi and J.-R

    H.-H. Choi and J.-R. Lee, Principles, applications, and chal- lenges of synchronization in nature for future mobile commu- nication systems, Mob. Inf. Syst.2017, 8932631 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    Pljonkin, K

    A. Pljonkin, K. Rumyantsev, and P. K. Singh, Synchroniza- tion in quantum key distribution systems, Cryptography1, 18 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    J. T. Stuart, On the non-linear mechanics of wave disturbances in stable and unstable parallel flows part 1. the basic behaviour 18 in plane poiseuille flow, J. Fluid Mech.9, 353 (1960)

    work page 1960

  63. [63]

    Watson, On the non-linear mechanics of wave disturbances in stable and unstable parallel flows part 2

    J. Watson, On the non-linear mechanics of wave disturbances in stable and unstable parallel flows part 2. the development of a solution for plane poiseuille flow and for plane couette flow, J. Fluid Mech.9, 371 (1960)

    work page 1960

  64. [64]

    Fukunaga and L

    K. Fukunaga and L. Hostetler, The estimation of the gradient of a density function, with applications in pattern recognition, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory21, 32 (1975)

    work page 1975

  65. [65]

    Cheng, Mean shift, mode seeking, and clustering, IEEE Trans

    Y . Cheng, Mean shift, mode seeking, and clustering, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.17, 790 (1995)

    work page 1995

  66. [66]

    Comaniciu and P

    D. Comaniciu and P. Meer, Mean shift: a robust approach to- ward feature space analysis, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.24, 603 (2002)

    work page 2002