Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Geometric Origin of Phonon Magnetic Moment in Dirac Materials

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that optical phonons in doped Dirac materials acquire large magnetic moments because they act as dynamic geometric fields on the electron fluid, with the frame-field channel coupling the phonon moment directly to the…

desk verdict New frame-field mechanism for phonon magnetic moments, with a clean symmetry argument, but the quantitative Cd3As2 agreement rests on an unverified 2D-to-3D generalization and a fitted tau. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09732 v1 pith:JPYESMRR submitted 2025-05-14 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Wenqin Chen , Xiao-Wei Zhang , Ting Cao , Shi-Zeng Lin , Di Xiao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords phononmagneticmomentDiracsemimetalHallviscosityframefieldemergentgaugeelectron-phononcouplingCd3As2chiralphonons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to explain why optical phonons in doped Dirac materials can carry magnetic moments approaching the Bohr magneton, even though the ions are heavy and classically almost nonmagnetic. The proposal is that a vibrating lattice acts on the Dirac electrons in two geometric ways: as an emergent gauge field that shifts the Dirac point, and as a frame (gravitational) field that deforms the Dirac cone and makes the Fermi surface elliptical. Integrating out the electrons, the gauge-field channel ties the phonon moment to the electrical Hall conductivity, while the frame-field channel ties it to the Hall viscosity $\eta_H$ of the electron fluid. Applied to the Dirac semimetal Cd3As2 with first-principles input, the frame-field channel alone gives a phonon magnetic moment in quantitative agreement with the measured value, and it identifies the measured Eu phonon as an inversion-odd mode for which the gauge-field contribution vanishes. If correct, the theory turns phonon spectroscopy into a probe of a transport coefficient, Hall viscosity, that is otherwise very hard to measure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the frame field (vielbein) $e^\mu_A$, the square root of the metric that the phonon displacement dynamically creates: the same lattice vibration that stretches bonds along one direction rescales the Dirac cone and tilts it. The Hall viscosity action $S_H[e] = (\eta_H/2) \int dt\, d^2x\, \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho} e^A_\mu \partial_\nu e^B_\rho \delta_{AB}$, obtained by integrating out Dirac fermions coupled to this frame, is what converts phonon motion into a transverse force on the phonon itself; substituting the phonon-induced coframe $w^A_\mu$ turns it into the time-reversal-breaking term $S_H[u] \propto \int \epsilon\, u \times \dot u$. The angular-momentum classification of Fermi-surface deformations ($l=0$ monopolar, $l=1$ dipolar, $l=2$ quadrupolar) is the organizing device that separates the gauge-field channel (Hall conductivity) from the frame-field channel (Hall viscosity) and explains why an inversion-odd mode sees only the viscosity channel.

What would settle it

Measure the magnetic-field dependence of the Eu phonon splitting in Cd3As2 at fixed Fermi energy across a range of carrier densities and transport lifetimes. The theory predicts a weak-field splitting linear in $B$ with $\mu_{\rm ph} \propto n_e m^* \tau^2$, a maximum near $\omega_c \tau = 1/2$, and a $1/B$ falloff at higher fields; data that show instead a strictly linear splitting with no density or lifetime scaling would rule out the Hall-viscosity mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the magnetic moment of an optical phonon in a doped Dirac material is a geometric response of the electron fluid, not a property of the ion motion. When phonon displacement $u$ distorts the local frame seen by Dirac fermions, the resulting coframe field $w^A_\mu$ generates an effective action $S_H[u] = (\eta_H \beta^2 / 2a^2) \int dt\, d^2x\, \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho} u_\mu \partial_\nu u_\rho$, where $\eta_H$ is the electron Hall viscosity and $\beta/a$ measures the electron-phonon coupling strength. This term breaks time-reversal symmetry, splits the left- and right-handed phonon modes, and produces the phonon magnetic moment $\mu_{\rm ph} = (\hbar \beta^2 / \rho_I a^2)(\eta_H / B)$, which stays finite as $B \to 0$ because $\eta_H$ itself is linear in $B$ in the weak-field regime. The accompanying classification by angular momentum channels of Fermi-surface deformation shows that the dipolar ($l=1$) channel is the emergent gauge field and gives $\mu_{\rm ph} \propto \sigma_{xy}$, while the quadrupolar ($l=2$) channel is the frame field and gives $\mu_{\rm ph} \propto \eta_H$; inversion-odd phonons, like the Eu mode in Cd3As2, can only use the frame-field channel. First-principles calculations for Cd3As2 confirm the phonon-induced elliptic Fermi-surface distortion, yield $\beta/a \approx 632 \ \AA^{-1}$, and with a transport lifetime $\tau \approx 0.1$ ps give a phonon magnetic moment in agreement with the experimental value.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation stands on the assumption that integrating out electrons from a weakly magnetized, three-dimensional Dirac fluid gives the same Hall-viscosity coefficient as the formula derived for two-dimensional electron fluids; if the Cd3As2 electron fluid does not obey that semiclassical formula, the predicted magnitude of the phonon moment changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the weak-field limit the phonon Zeeman splitting is linear in magnetic field and the extracted phonon magnetic moment is independent of $B$; in the strong-field limit the splitting becomes inversely proportional to $B$, a crossover that can be checked directly in experiment.
  • For inversion-even optical phonons in the same class of materials, the gauge-field channel contributes a moment proportional to the electrical Hall conductivity, so the two geometric channels can be separated by comparing modes of opposite parity.
  • Phonon spectroscopy of an infrared-active optical mode becomes a measurement channel for the Hall viscosity of a Dirac electron fluid, with $\eta_H$ extracted from the splitting $\delta\omega = \eta_H \beta^2 / (a^2 \rho_I)$ without needing transport contacts.
  • The theory explains large phonon moments in gapless metals without invoking circulating-ion orbital moments, resolving the discrepancy between nuclear-magneton-scale classical estimates and Bohr-magneton-scale observations.
  • For Cd3As2 specifically, the Eu mode's observed linear-in-$B$ splitting and its magnitude both follow from the frame-field mechanism once the Fermi energy and transport lifetime are set to their experimental values.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension: because the semiclassical Hall viscosity peaks at $\omega_c \tau = 1/2$, the phonon splitting should reach a maximum near that field and then fall as $1/B$; no conventional ion-circulation or Berry-curvature mechanism produces that nonmonotonic shape.
  • If the mechanism is generic, the phonon magnetic moment in other Dirac or Weyl semimetals should track the electron density, effective mass, and transport lifetime through $\eta_H \propto n_e m^* v_F^2 \tau^2$ in the weak-field limit, which could be separated by comparing samples with different doping and mobility.
  • The paper explicitly leaves spin-orbit-induced spin polarization of chiral phonons for future work; a calculation of that spin channel would complete the picture for materials with strong spin-orbit coupling, where the orbital channel considered here may not be the only contribution.
  • Soft-bonded materials with large Grüneisen parameters should show disproportionately larger frame-field phonon moments, since the coupling enters as $\beta^2$; comparing PbTe, Pb$_{1-x}$Sn$_x$Te, or other reported large-moment systems would test this scaling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a theory of phonon magnetic moments in doped Dirac materials in which optical phonons couple to Dirac fermions as emergent gauge fields and frame (vielbein) fields. The authors classify electron-phonon coupling by the angular momentum channel of Fermi-surface deformation, associate the l=1 channel with an emergent gauge field and the l=2 channel with a frame field, and derive a phonon effective action whose time-reversal-odd term is proportional to the electron Hall viscosity. The central result, Eq. (8), states that the phonon magnetic moment is μ_ph = (ℏβ^2)/(ρ_I a^2) · (η_H/B). The authors apply the frame-field mechanism to Cd3As2, combine it with first-principles calculations, and report quantitative agreement with the measured phonon magnetic moment. They further suggest that phonon dynamics can be used as a probe of electron Hall viscosity.

Significance. If established, the proposed frame-field mechanism would be a significant conceptual advance: it connects phonon magnetism in doped Dirac materials to a well-defined electronic transport coefficient (Hall viscosity), provides a symmetry-based selection rule (inversion-odd modes cannot couple through the gauge-field channel), and yields a falsifiable prediction of phonon frequency splitting linear in B. The tight-binding derivation of the frame field and the symmetry argument for the vanishing gauge field in the Eu mode are explicit and coherent, and the angular-momentum classification is a useful organizing principle. However, the quantitative comparison with Cd3As2 currently rests on several uncontrolled steps: the 2D Hall-viscosity action is extended to a 3D gapless Dirac semimetal by a one-sentence 'stacking' argument, the phonon action uses a 3D mass density inside a 2D integral, and the reported agreement depends sensitively on the transport lifetime τ, which is not independently determined in the paper. The central formal mechanism is credible, but the quantitative claim is not yet established.

major comments (5)
  1. [§Phonon magnetic moment and Supplemental 'Electron Hall viscosity'] The central relation, Eq. (8), is built on the parity-odd Hall-viscosity action S_H[e] = (η_H/2)∫dtd^2x ε e ∂ e, which was derived for massive (Chern-insulating) 2D Dirac fermions. The only bridge to the doped 3D Dirac semimetal is the sentence 'By stacking Chern insulators in momentum space, this term can also be generalized...', citing Refs. [44,56,58]. Ref. [58] (Zyuzin-Burkov) concerns the chiral anomaly, not odd viscosity, and none of the cited works derives an effective action for a gapless, doped 3D Dirac fluid. For gapless fermions, integrating out the Fermi sea generically produces nonlocal or wavevector-dependent responses, so the local Chern-Simons-type form cannot be assumed. Since each k_z slice has a different Fermi momentum, the k_z reduction can introduce an O(1) prefactor and may modify the B and τ dependence of μ_ph. Please derive this reduction explicitly, for example by integrating the 2D Hall-viscosity response over k_z or by evaluating the fermion determinant for the full 3D Hamiltonian, and report the resulting prefactor. Without this, Eq. (8) is not actually tied to the bulk Dirac fluid of Cd3As2.
  2. [§Phonon magnetic moment, Eq. (7), and Eq. (S48)] The effective phonon action S_0[u] = (1/2)∫dtd^2x ρ_I( u-dot^2 - ω_0^2 u^2 ) is written with a two-dimensional spatial integral, yet ρ_I is quoted as the three-dimensional ion mass density 3.03×10^3 kg/m^3. A 3D density appearing inside a 2D action is dimensionally inconsistent; the correct coefficient requires either a 2D mass density (an integral of the 3D density over the out-of-plane direction) or a proper dimensional reduction of the phonon action. Because Eq. (8) uses this same ρ_I, the numerical magnitude of μ_ph depends on how this ambiguity is resolved. Please define the effective 2D mass density entering Eq. (7), or give the explicit reduction from the 3D phonon action, and state the resulting numerical value used in Eq. (8).
  3. [Application to Cd3As2, Fig. 2(e)] The quantitative agreement with experiment is presented in Fig. 2(e), where μ_ph is plotted versus τ, and in the text that states τ~0.1 ps for the experimental sample. In the weak-field limit used after Eq. (8), η_H ≈ n_e e v_F^2 τ^2 B/2, so μ_ph ∝ τ^2; a factor of two in τ changes μ_ph by a factor of four. The paper does not state where τ is obtained from (for example, the measured transport mobility of the sample in Ref. [27]), and Fig. 2(d) uses a different value, τ=0.08 ps. As presented, the agreement is a fit or a consistency check rather than a predictive first-principles calculation. Please provide an independent determination of τ and the carrier density n_e for the experimental sample, and report the sensitivity of the claimed agreement to these inputs.
  4. [Semiclassical Hall viscosity, Supplemental Eqs. (S37)-(S38)] The formula ν_H = (v_F^2/2) ω_c τ^2/(1 + 4ω_c^2 τ^2) and η_H = n_e m* ν_H are derived from a two-dimensional Boltzmann equation in the hydrodynamic regime (Refs. [60-62]). Applying this to a doped 3D Dirac semimetal assumes that the electron system is hydrodynamic at the relevant temperature and that the τ entering the Hall-viscosity response is the same transport lifetime used in ordinary magnetotransport. Neither assumption is justified in the manuscript. Please provide estimates of the electron-electron collision rate relative to the impurity rate, or otherwise delineate the regime of validity of the semiclassical Hall-viscosity formula for Cd3As2.
  5. [Supplemental 'Electron-phonon coupling in Cd3As2'] The electron-phonon coupling parameter β/a=632 Å^-1 is obtained from a frozen-phonon DFT calculation in which the displacement amplitude is set to 1 Å and the 80-atom displacement pattern is averaged into a single number through the minimal s-p model. Because μ_ph depends on (β/a)^2, an uncertainty or systematic error in this reduction directly changes the predicted magnitude by a large factor. Please provide a robustness check, such as convergence with displacement amplitude or an independent extraction of the frame-field coupling from the DFT band structure, and give an error estimate for β/a.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (S25)] The main text and Supplemental use inconsistent integration measures for the Hall-viscosity action: Eq. (7) writes ∫dtd^2x while Eq. (S25) writes ∫d^3x; please unify the notation and use the (2+1)-dimensional convention consistently.
  2. [Supplemental 'Electron Hall viscosity'] The sentence 'Since the frame field e^A_μ is dimensionless, the Hall viscosity coefficient η_H must be scaled by 1/[length]^2' is unclear and should be rewritten in terms of the mass dimensions of the action and the effective dimensionality of the fluid.
  3. [Table I] In Table I, the l=0 row lists '0' under μ_ph in a column that otherwise contains σ_xy and η_H; please clarify that the l=0 channel produces no magnetic moment in the present analysis, to avoid confusion between coupling channels and the resulting moment.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption of Fig. 2(d)-(e) should state the carrier density corresponding to ε_F=0.1 eV and should indicate whether τ is an independently measured parameter or a chosen value in each panel.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Central frame-field mechanism is derived, not circular; but the claimed Cd3As2 quantitative agreement is obtained by choosing τ, which enters μ_ph quadratically, making the validation a one-parameter match.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Application to Cd3As2; Fig. 2(e) and preceding text]
    "Finally, in Fig. 2(e), we plot the phonon magnetic moment as a function of τ at fixed Fermi energy εF = 0.1 eV. For the experimental sample, τ∼0.1 ps, and the calculated phonon magnetic moment is in good agreement with the measured value."

    The paper's own weak-field limit gives μ_ph ∝ η_H/B with η_H ≈ n_e v_F^2 τ^2 eB/2, so μ_ph ∝ τ^2. τ is not derived in this paper and no independent measurement of τ for the experimental sample is cited. Fig. 2(e) plots μ_ph as a one-parameter function of τ and the 'agreement' is located at τ≈0.1 ps, i.e. the experimental value is used to select the curve parameter. Any target μ_ph could be reproduced by choosing τ accordingly, so the quantitative validation reduces to a fitted input rather than being an independent prediction. The derivation of Eq. (8) itself is not circular; only the claimed magnitude agreement with experiment is.

full rationale

The core derivation is self-contained. The frame-field representation of the phonon is obtained from a microscopic tight-binding model (Eqs. (2)-(4) and Supplemental Eqs. (S13)-(S21)); the Hall-viscosity effective action S_H[e] is a cited standard result from Refs. [44,56], not from the present authors; substituting the phonon coframe gives Eq. (7); the resulting splitting δω = β^2 η_H/(2 a^2 ρ_I) and Eq. (8) follow algebraically. The Hall viscosity η_H is then computed independently by a semiclassical Boltzmann calculation (Eqs. (S28)-(S38)), so Eq. (8) is not a restatement of its input. The self-citation [51] supplies the gauge-field channel, which the paper explicitly does not use for the Eu mode in Cd3As2, so it is not load-bearing. The 2D-to-3D 'stacking' generalization ("By stacking Chern insulators in momentum space...") is a modeling assumption whose support from the cited references is not demonstrated; that is a correctness risk, not a circularity. The one genuine circular element is the experimental validation: τ enters μ_ph quadratically, and the paper's agreement with the measured value is achieved by assigning τ≈0.1 ps without an independent determination. This makes the claimed quantitative agreement partly circular while leaving the central mechanism independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central formula mu_ph = hbar beta^2/(rho_I a^2) * eta_H/B depends on material parameters (beta/a, rho_I, v_F) and on the Hall viscosity model for the electron fluid; the quantitative comparison to experiment hinges on tau, which is effectively adjusted.

free parameters (3)
  • tau (electron transport lifetime) = ~0.1 ps
    The mu_ph vs tau curve (Fig. 2e) crosses the experimental value at tau about 0.1 ps; the paper does not provide an independent measurement or uncertainty for tau, so the quantitative agreement is effectively a fit.
  • epsilon_F (Fermi energy) = 0.1 eV
    Used for the Cd3As2 estimates; the corresponding carrier density n_e is derived from it, and no uncertainty is given.
  • beta/a (electron-phonon coupling parameter) = 632 A^-1
    Extracted from DFT by comparing Dirac cone slopes under a 1 A phonon displacement; the value is very large and no error bar is provided. It enters mu_ph quadratically.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The (2+1)D Chern-Simons effective action for frame fields, S_H[e] = (eta_H/2) int epsilon e partial e, generalizes to the (3+1)D doped Dirac semimetal by stacking in momentum space.
    Invoked in the section 'Phonon magnetic moment' with Refs [44,58]; not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The Hall viscosity of the Dirac electron fluid in the weak-field semiclassical regime is given by eta_H = n_e m^* nu_H with nu_H = (v_F^2/2) omega_c tau^2/(1+4 omega_c^2 tau^2).
    Taken from 2D electron hydrodynamics Refs [60-62]; applicability to a 3D Dirac semimetal is assumed.
  • domain assumption For the Eu mode in Cd3As2, the emergent gauge field vanishes exactly due to inversion-odd symmetry, leaving the frame field mechanism as the only contribution.
    Derived from the tight-binding model and symmetry analysis; relies on the phonon mode being purely inversion-odd and on the Fermi surface enclosing both Weyl nodes after spin-orbit splitting so that gauge contributions cancel.
  • domain assumption The linearized relation between phonon displacement and the frame field, e approximately 1 - beta u/a, remains valid at the displacement amplitudes relevant to the quantum phonon.
    The DFT extraction uses a 1 A displacement; the resulting beta u/a is of order one, which may violate the linearization assumed throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometric Origin of Phonon Magnetic Moment in Dirac Materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JPYESMRR

@misc{pith2026250509732,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometric Origin of Phonon Magnetic Moment in Dirac Materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JPYESMRR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09732}
}
abstract

We develop a theory for the phonon magnetic moment in doped Dirac materials, treating phonons as emergent gauge and gravitational fields coupled to Dirac fermions in curved space. By classifying electron-phonon coupling into angular momentum channels of Fermi surface deformation, we show that the phonon moment arises from two mechanisms: proportional to the electron Hall conductivity through the emergent gauge field coupling, and to the Hall viscosity through the frame field coupling. Applying our theory to Cd$_3$As$_2$ with first-principles calculations, we find quantitative agreement with experiment. Our results reveal a general mechanism for dynamically generating large phonon magnetism in metals and suggest a new route for probing Hall viscosity via phonon dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09732 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of phonon-induced gauge and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. First-principles analysis of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Geometry contribution to sound attenuation in double-Weyl semimetals

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In double-Weyl semimetals, sound attenuation is controlled by strain-induced Fermi-surface geometry, giving Γ = τ*ω²µ/(8πa³)(v1/v2)γ²/(ρv_s²), with no magnetic-field dependence at low B.

  2. Pseudo-chiral phonon splitting from octupolar magnetic order

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a model of multipolar magnets, ferro-octupolar order splits the Eg phonon doublet into pseudo-chiral modes with a gap near 1 meV, which Raman spectroscopy can resolve, while quadrupolar order leaves no resolvable s...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [58]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL] for details of Dirac fermions in curved space, tight-binding model, electron Hall viscosity, phonon dynamics, and computational de- tails

    work page

  2. [49]

    J. L. Mañes, Symmetry-based approach to electron- phonon interactions in graphene, Phys. Rev. B76, 045430 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [27]

    D.M.JuraschekandN.A.Spaldin,Orbitalmagneticmo- ments of phonons, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 064405 (2019)

    2019

  4. [1]

    This quadrupolar component shares the same tensorial form as a nematic order parameter, capturing an elliptic distortion of the Fermi surface

    = (cosθ,sinθ)is the phonon polarization direction. This quadrupolar component shares the same tensorial form as a nematic order parameter, capturing an elliptic distortion of the Fermi surface. We note that theformationofthenematicFermisurfaceisdynamically driven by the phonon excitations, which is distinct from the static nematic order that arises from s...

    work page

  5. [2]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Chiral phonons at high-symmetry points in monolayer hexagonal lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 115502 (2015)

    2015

  6. [3]

    H. Zhu, J. Yi, M.-Y. Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C.-W. Yang, R. A. Kaindl, L.-J. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Obser- vation of chiral phonons, Science359, 579 (2018)

    2018

  7. [4]

    Ishito, H

    K. Ishito, H. Mao, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, S. Iwasaki, T. Zhang, S. Murakami, J.-i. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons inα-HgS, Nature Physics19, 35 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [5]

    H. Ueda, M. García-Fernández, S. Agrestini, C. P. Ro- mao, J. van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K.-J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chiral phonons in quartz probed by X-rays, Nature618, 946 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 72 references
  1. [6]

    Grissonnanche, A

    G. Grissonnanche, A. Legros, S. Badoux, E. Lefrançois, V. Zatko, M. Lizaire, F. Laliberté, A. Gourgout, J.-S. Zhou, S. Pyon,et al., Giant thermal Hall conductivity in the pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors, Nature 571, 376 (2019)

    2019

  2. [7]

    X.Li, B.Fauqué, Z.Zhu,andK.Behnia,Phononthermal Hall effect in strontium titanate, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 105901 (2020)

    2020

  3. [8]

    Grissonnanche, S

    G. Grissonnanche, S. Thériault, A. Gourgout, M.-E. Boulanger, E.Lefrançois, A.Ataei, F.Laliberté, M.Dion, J.-S. Zhou, S. Pyon,et al., Chiral phonons in the pseudo- gap phase of cuprates, Nature Physics16, 1108 (2020)

    2020

  4. [9]

    Park and B.-J

    S. Park and B.-J. Yang, Phonon angular momentum Hall effect, Nano Letters20, 7694 (2020), pMID: 32955897

    2020

  5. [10]

    Boulanger, G

    M.-E. Boulanger, G. Grissonnanche, S. Badoux, A. Al- laire, É. Lefrançois, A. Legros, A. Gourgout, M. Dion, C. Wang, X. Chen,et al., Thermal Hall conductivity in the cuprate mott insulators Nd2Cuo4 and Sr2CuO2Cl2, Nature communications11, 5325 (2020)

    2020

  6. [11]

    Chen, M.-E

    L. Chen, M.-E. Boulanger, Z.-C. Wang, F. Tafti, and L. Taillefer, Large phonon thermal Hall conductivity in the antiferromagnetic insulator Cu3Teo6, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2208016119 (2022)

    2022

  7. [12]

    Saito, K

    T. Saito, K. Misaki, H. Ishizuka, and N. Nagaosa, Berry phase of phonons and thermal Hall effect in nonmagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 255901 (2019)

    2019

  8. [13]

    Flebus and A

    B. Flebus and A. H. MacDonald, Phonon Hall viscosity of ionic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 236301 (2023)

    2023

  9. [14]

    Bonini, S

    J. Bonini, S. Ren, D. Vanderbilt, M. Stengel, C. E. Dreyer, and S. Coh, Frequency splitting of chiral phonons from broken time-reversal symmetry in CrI3, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 086701 (2023)

    2023

  10. [15]

    S. Ren, J. Bonini, M. Stengel, C. E. Dreyer, and D. Van- derbilt,Adiabaticdynamicsofcoupledspinsandphonons in magnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. X14, 011041 (2024)

    2024

  11. [16]

    Hamada and S

    M. Hamada and S. Murakami, Conversion between elec- tron spin and microscopic atomic rotation, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023275 (2020)

    2020

  12. [17]

    T. F. Nova, A. Cartella, A. Cantaluppi, M. Först, D. Bossini, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. V. Kimel, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, An effective magnetic field from opti- cally driven phonons, Nature Physics13, 132 (2017)

    2017

  13. [18]

    J. Luo, T. Lin, J. Zhang, X. Chen, E. R. Blackert, R. Xu, B. I. Yakobson, and H. Zhu, Large effective magnetic fields from chiral phonons in rare-earth halides, Science 382, 698 (2023)

    2023

  14. [19]

    Basini, M

    M. Basini, M. Pancaldi, B. Wehinger, M. Udina, V. Unikandanunni, T. Tadano, M. C. Hoffmann, A. V. Balatsky, and S. Bonetti, Terahertz electric-field- driven dynamical multiferroicity in SrTiO3, Nature628, 534–539 (2024)

    2024

  15. [20]

    Davies, F

    C. Davies, F. Fennema, A. Tsukamoto, I. Razdolski, A. Kimel, and A. Kirilyuk, Phononic switching of magne- tization by the ultrafast Barnett effect, Nature , 1 (2024)

    2024

  16. [21]

    D. M. Juraschek, P. Narang, and N. A. Spaldin, Phono- magnetic analogs to opto-magnetic effects, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043035 (2020)

    2020

  17. [22]

    D. M. Juraschek, T. c. v. Neuman, and P. Narang, Gi- 6 ant effective magnetic fields from optically driven chiral phonons in4fparamagnets, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013129 (2022)

    2022

  18. [23]

    D. Shin, H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, H. Jin, A. Ru- bio, and N. Park, Phonon-driven spin-floquet magneto- valleytronics in MoS2, Nature communications9, 638 (2018)

    2018

  19. [24]

    Y. Ren, M. Rudner, and D. Xiao, Light-driven sponta- neous phonon chirality and magnetization in paramag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 096702 (2024)

    2024

  20. [25]

    R. M. Geilhufe, V. Juričić, S. Bonetti, J.-X. Zhu, and A. V. Balatsky, Dynamically induced magnetism in KTaO3, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L022011 (2021)

    2021

  21. [26]

    D. M. Juraschek, M. Fechner, A. V. Balatsky, and N. A. Spaldin, Dynamical multiferroicity, Phys. Rev. Mater.1, 014401 (2017)

    2017

  22. [28]

    Cheng, T

    B. Cheng, T. Schumann, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, D. Bar- balas, S. Stemmer, and N. P. Armitage, A large effective phonon magnetic moment in a Dirac semimetal, Nano Letters20, 5991 (2020)

    2020

  23. [29]

    Baydin, F

    A. Baydin, F. G. G. Hernandez, M. Rodriguez-Vega, A. K. Okazaki, F. Tay, G. T. Noe, I. Katayama, J. Takeda, H. Nojiri, P. H. O. Rappl, E. Abramof, G. A. Fiete, and J. Kono, Magnetic control of soft chiral phonons in PbTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 075901 (2022)

    2022

  24. [30]

    F. G. G. Hernandez, A. Baydin, S. Chaudhary, F. Tay, I. Katayama, J. Takeda, H. Nojiri, A. K. Okazaki, P. H. O. Rappl, E. Abramof, M. Rodriguez-Vega, G. A. Fiete, and J. Kono, Observation of interplay between phonon chirality and electronic band topology, Science Advances9, ea...

    2023

  25. [31]

    F. Wu, S. Bao, J. Zhou, Y. Wang, J. Sun, J. Wen, Y. Wan, and Q. Zhang, Fluctuation-enhanced phonon magnetic moments in a polar antiferromagnet, Nature Physics19, 1868 (2023)

    2023

  26. [32]

    C. Tang, G. Ye, C. Nnokwe, M. Fang, L. Xiang, M. Mahjouri-Samani, D. Smirnov, E.-H. Yang, T. Wang, L. Zhang, R. He, and W. Jin, Exciton-activated effective phonon magnetic moment in monolayermos2, Phys. Rev. B109, 155426 (2024)

    2024

  27. [33]

    Mustafa, C

    H. Mustafa, C. Nnokwe, G. Ye, M. Fang, S. Chaud- hary, J.-A. Yan, K. Wu, C. J. Cunningham, C. M. Hemesath, A. J. Stollenwerk, P. M. Shand, E.-H. Yang, G. A. Fiete, R. He, and W. Jin, Origin of large effective phonon magnetic moments in monolayer mos2, ACS Nano19, 11241 (2025),...

    2025 doi

  28. [34]

    Dong and Q

    L. Dong and Q. Niu, Geometrodynamics of electrons in a crystal under position and time-dependent deformation, Phys. Rev. B98, 115162 (2018)

    2018

  29. [35]

    Trifunovic, S

    L. Trifunovic, S. Ono, and H. Watanabe, Geometric or- bital magnetization in adiabatic processes, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054408 (2019)

    2019

  30. [36]

    Y. Ren, C. Xiao, D. Saparov, and Q. Niu, Phonon mag- netic moment from electronic topological magnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186403 (2021)

    2021

  31. [37]

    Zhang, Y

    X.-W. Zhang, Y. Ren, C. Wang, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Gate-tunable phonon magnetic moment in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 226302 (2023)

    2023

  32. [38]

    Chaudhary, D

    S. Chaudhary, D. M. Juraschek, M. Rodriguez-Vega, and G. A. Fiete, Giant effective magnetic moments of chiral phonons from orbit-lattice coupling, Phys. Rev. B110, 094401 (2024)

    2024

  33. [39]

    Y. Su, A. V. Balatsky, and S.-Z. Lin, Quantum nonlinear acoustic hall effect and inverse acoustic faraday effect in dirac insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 026304 (2025)

    2025

  34. [40]

    Suzuura and T

    H. Suzuura and T. Ando, Phonons and electron-phonon scattering in carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. B65, 235412 (2002)

    2002

  35. [41]

    Vozmediano, M

    M. Vozmediano, M. Katsnelson, and F. Guinea, Gauge fields in graphene, Physics Reports496, 109 (2010)

    2010

  36. [42]

    Cortijo, Y

    A. Cortijo, Y. Ferreirós, K. Landsteiner, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Elastic gauge fields in weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 177202 (2015)

    2015

  37. [43]

    D. I. Pikulin, A. Chen, and M. Franz, Chiral anomaly from strain-induced gauge fields in dirac and weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. X6, 041021 (2016)

    2016

  38. [44]

    A. G. Grushin, J. W. F. Venderbos, A. Vishwanath, and R. Ilan, Inhomogeneous weyl and dirac semimetals: Transport in axial magnetic fields and fermi arc surface states from pseudo-landau levels, Phys. Rev. X6, 041046 (2016)

    2016

  39. [45]

    T. L. Hughes, R. G. Leigh, and E. Fradkin, Torsional response and dissipationless viscosity in topological insu- lators, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 075502 (2011)

    2011

  40. [46]

    Barkeshli, S

    M. Barkeshli, S. B. Chung, and X.-L. Qi, Dissipationless phonon Hall viscosity, Phys. Rev. B85, 245107 (2012)

    2012

  41. [47]

    Shapourian, T

    H. Shapourian, T. L. Hughes, and S. Ryu, Viscoelastic response of topological tight-binding models in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B92, 165131 (2015)

    2015

  42. [48]

    Liu and J

    D. Liu and J. Shi, Circular phonon dichroism in weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 075301 (2017)

    2017

  43. [50]

    Heidari, A

    S. Heidari, A. Cortijo, and R. Asgari, Hall viscosity for optical phonons, Phys. Rev. B100, 165427 (2019)

    2019

  44. [51]

    L.-H.Hu, J.Yu, I.Garate,andC.-X.Liu,Phononhelicity induced by electronic berry curvature in dirac materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 125901 (2021)

    2021

  45. [52]

    Chen, X.-W

    W. Chen, X.-W. Zhang, Y. Su, T. Cao, D. Xiao, and S.- Z. Lin, Gauge theory of giant phonon magnetic moment in doped dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B111, 035126 (2025)

    2025

  46. [53]

    Weyl, Elektron und gravitation

    H. Weyl, Elektron und gravitation. i, Zeitschrift für Physik56, 330 (1929)

    1929

  47. [54]

    Fock, Geometrisierung der diracschen theorie des elek- trons, Zeitschrift für Physik57, 261 (1929)

    V. Fock, Geometrisierung der diracschen theorie des elek- trons, Zeitschrift für Physik57, 261 (1929)

    1929

  48. [55]

    S.Carroll, S.Carroll,andAddison-Wesley,Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity(Addi- son Wesley, 2004)

    2004

  49. [56]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, M. J. Lawler, J. P. Eisenstein, and A. P. Mackenzie, Nematic fermi fluids in condensed matter physics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 153 (2010)

    2010

  50. [57]

    T. L. Hughes, R. G. Leigh, and O. Parrikar, Torsional anomalies, hall viscosity, and bulk-boundary correspon- dence in topological states, Phys. Rev. D88, 025040 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    A. A. Zyuzin and A. A. Burkov, Topological response in weyl semimetals and the chiral anomaly, Phys. Rev. B 86, 115133 (2012). 1

    2012

  52. [60]

    J. E. Avron, R. Seiler, and P. G. Zograf, Viscosity of quantum hall fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 697 (1995)

    1995

  53. [61]

    P. S. Alekseev, Negative magnetoresistance in viscous flow of two-dimensional electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 166601 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Scaffidi, N

    T. Scaffidi, N. Nandi, B. Schmidt, A. P. Mackenzie, and J. E. Moore, Hydrodynamic electron flow and hall vis- cosity, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 226601 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    F. M. D. Pellegrino, I. Torre, and M. Polini, Nonlocal transport and the hall viscosity of two-dimensional hy- drodynamic electron liquids, Phys. Rev. B96, 195401 (2017)

    2017

  56. [64]

    Z. Wang, H. Weng, Q. Wu, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Three- dimensional dirac semimetal and quantum transport in cd3as2, Phys. Rev. B88, 125427 (2013)

    2013

  57. [65]

    T. I. Tuegel and T. L. Hughes, Hall viscosity and mo- mentum transport in lattice and continuum models of the integer quantum hall effect in strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B92, 165127 (2015)

    2015

  58. [66]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Fluid Mechanics: Vol- ume 6, Vol. 6 (Elsevier, 1987)

    1987

  59. [67]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli,et al., Quantum espresso: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  60. [68]

    D.Hamann,Optimizednorm-conservingvanderbiltpseu- dopotentials, Physical Review B88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  61. [69]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradientapproximationmadesimple,Physicalreviewlet- ters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  62. [70]

    M. N. Ali, Q. Gibson, S. Jeon, B. B. Zhou, A. Yazdani, and R. J. Cava, The crystal and electronic structures of Cd3As2, the three-dimensional electronic analogue of graphene, Inorganic Chemistry53, 4062 (2014)

    2014

  63. [71]

    Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan92, 012001 (2023)

    A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan92, 012001 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    Geometric Origin of Phonon Magnetic Moment in Dirac Materials

    A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, and I. Tanaka, Imple- mentation strategies in phonopy and phono3py, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2023). Supplemental Information for “Geometric Origin of Phonon Magnetic Moment in Dirac Materials” DIRAC FERMIONS IN CUR VED SP ACE We brie...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.