Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Electron spin resonance with scanning tunneling microscopy: a tool for an on-surface quantum platform of identical qubits

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Electron spin resonance inside a scanning tunneling microscope can execute CNOT and Toffoli gates on single surface atoms, and the authors argue the same controls should transfer to molecular spins.

desk verdict A useful but unfinished review of ESR-STM: the atomic-qubit summary is solid, while the molecular-qubit pitch overreaches and the manuscript contains obvious placeholders and citation mismatches that need fixing before it is publishable. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10079 v1 pith:R4N6VSGK submitted 2025-05-15 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Deung-Jang Choi , Soo-hyon Phark , Andreas J. Heinrich , Nicolás Lorente This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords electronspinresonancescanningtunnelingmicroscopyatomicqubitsmolecularCNOTgateToffoliRabioscillationsmagnesiumoxidesurface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that electron spin resonance combined with scanning tunneling microscopy (ESR-STM) is not just a spectroscopy tool but a working platform for quantum circuits built from identical atomic spins. It reviews experiments in which pulsed radio-frequency excitation drives coherent Rabi oscillations of individual titanium atoms on a magnesium oxide film, and shows how transition-selective pulses implement a CNOT gate between two atoms and a Toffoli gate among three. The authors further propose that the same control schemes can be transferred to chemically designed molecular spins, whose self-assembly could make dense, addressable qubit arrays. If this holds, ESR-STM would offer an all-electrical, atomic-scale route to universal quantum logic.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the spin-polarized STM tip, which couples the radio-frequency electric field in the tunnel junction to the spin through time-dependent Hamiltonian matrix elements and reads the spin state through tunneling magnetoresistance. Pulsed driving from an arbitrary waveform generator creates Rabi oscillations, and choosing the frequency, duration, and amplitude of a pulse selects a transition between Zeeman product states of two or three coupled spins. Weak exchange coupling between atoms keeps the eigenstates close to product states, giving distinct transition frequencies for each qubit combination, while exchange interaction with nearby single-atom magnets (iron atoms) amplifies the driving field so that qubits outside the tunnel junction can be controlled. This combination of atom manipulation, spectral selection, and exchange engineering is what turns an atomic arrangement into a working quantum circuit.

What would settle it

Deposit a chemically assembled molecule with two coupled spin centers on a MgO/Ag(100) surface, drive the transition corresponding to both spins in their ground state versus the target spin excited with a pi-pulse, and probe the sensor transition as in the atomic experiment. If the remote spin does not show a Rabi rotation conditional on the control spin state, the proposed molecular extension of ESR-STM logic fails; a null result would appear as a flat pulsed double-resonance response.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that ESR-STM achieves all-electrical coherent control of individual surface spins at atomic scale, with energy resolution of tens of neV, and uses this control to implement a universal gate set in identical atoms. On two weakly coupled titanium atoms placed on a two-monolayer MgO film, a radio-frequency pi-pulse tuned to the transition between the two-qubit ground state and the state with the target atom excited performs a CNOT that flips the target only when the control atom is in its ground state. With three atoms, pulses tuned to four selected transitions realize a Toffoli gate in about 20 nanoseconds, flipping the remote qubit only when the other two are in their ground states. The paper extends this architecture to molecules: spin centers inside molecular magnets can act as sensor and remote qubits, and self-assembled molecular arrays could serve as scalable high-density qubit platforms.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that ESR-STM will work for molecular qubits rests on the assumption that molecular spin arrays will show the same spectral addressability and that the tip electric field will modulate exchange interactions within them just as it does for titanium atoms on magnesium oxide, which has not yet been demonstrated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because CNOT and Toffoli gates have been demonstrated, a universal gate set exists in an atomically assembled ESR-STM platform, enabling circuits such as GHZ-state preparation.
  • Since all qubits are identical atoms addressed by frequency, qubit arrays can be positioned with atomic precision through atom manipulation rather than lithography.
  • Remote qubits controlled through exchange-coupled single-atom magnets separate detection from control, allowing multi-qubit architectures to extend beyond the tunnel junction.
  • Transferring the scheme to molecular spins would exploit self-assembly and chemical tunability, potentially scaling toward high-density quantum processors.
  • The reported gate times of roughly 13 to 20 nanoseconds are short compared with typical spin coherence times at millikelvin temperatures, leaving room for error-correction protocols.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the molecular extension succeeds, ESR-STM could avoid the fabrication limits of other qubit platforms because self-assembly, not lithography, would define qubit positions; this is an inference beyond the paper's explicit claims.
  • The same transition-selective pulse sequences could be used to measure per-qubit coherence times and gate fidelities, data the review does not report.
  • The iron-atom exchange booster suggests that varying the booster species, size, and spacing could trade gate speed against crosstalk, a tunability the paper does not explore quantitatively.
  • The proposed GHZ-state circuit implies that multi-qubit entanglement could be certified through the sensor qubit's ESR spectrum without individually reading every spin, a step toward atomic-scale quantum-state tomography.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of electron spin resonance performed with a scanning tunneling microscope (ESR-STM), aimed at presenting ESR-STM as a platform for atomic-scale quantum computation. The paper reviews the operating principle of ESR-STM, single-spin addressability and coherent control via Rabi oscillations, frequency-resolved readout, and multi-qubit control of Ti atoms on a MgO/Ag(100) substrate. It describes the experimental realization of two-qubit CNOT and three-qubit Toffoli gates, discusses the use of single-atom magnets to drive remote qubits, and proposes an extension to molecular qubit systems based on self-assembled arrays and multi-spin molecular magnets. The review relies on previously published experiments, primarily Refs. [15,17,27-30].

Significance. If the manuscript's framing and references were corrected, this review would be a useful summary of the recent experimental progress in ESR-STM-based atomic spin qubits. The underlying experiments are peer-reviewed, and the description of single-qubit rotations, CNOT, and Toffoli gates is broadly consistent with those sources. The paper is less convincing in its forward-looking molecular-qubit section: the claim that ESR-STM can be directly extended to molecular qubits is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the cited references do not provide experimental support for ESR-STM on molecular spin centers. The review does not contain new experiments, derivations, or code, so its value rests on the accuracy of its synthesis and the clarity of its outlook.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section V] The abstract states 'We further demonstrate multi-qubit control architectures ... culminating in the realization of multi-qubit logic gates such as the Controlled-NOT and Toffoli gates,' and Section V similarly says 'The successful demonstration of fast and coherent multi-qubit operations at the atomic scale.' This paper is a review and reports no new experiments; these sentences claim direct demonstration rather than review of prior work, which misrepresents the paper's contribution. Rewrite as 'we review' or 'we summarize' throughout, and attribute the demonstrations explicitly to Refs. [15,17,27-30].
  2. [Section IV, 'Molecular Qubits on a surface' paragraph] The sentence 'The recent experiments demonstrate that by driving an electron current through one of the active spins in a complex molecular system, other qubits within the molecule can be manipulated via a combination of inter-qubit coupling and time-dependent external fields' cites Ref. [24], an arXiv review of Rydberg-atom quantum computing. The adjacent claim about spectator spins cites Ref. [25], a bulk pulsed-ESR molecular study, and Ref. [32] concerns synthesis/crystal engineering. None of these references supports an ESR-STM experiment on a molecular spin center. This citation mismatch removes the evidentiary basis for the paper's molecular-qubit extension.
  3. [Section IV and Figure 5] The conclusion that ESR-STM 'can be an excellent tool to perform and evaluate quantum operations in molecular qubits' is not supported by any quantitative argument specific to molecular systems. The paper provides no estimates of transition-frequency splittings relative to ESR linewidths in self-assembled molecular arrays, no mechanism for how the STM tip electric field would modulate intramolecular exchange interactions, and no discussion of inhomogeneous broadening or decoherence in molecular adsorbates. Please either supply such an analysis from the literature or explicitly label the molecular section as a speculative outlook rather than an established capability.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II, second paragraph] The sentence fragment 'required for transition between the two states |0⟩ and |1⟩ of the electron spin? ? ?' contains unresolved question marks; the completed term or mechanism description should be supplied.
  2. [Section III, first and second paragraphs] The text includes unresolved placeholders: 'GHZ? or cat state' and 'typical realization? in many available Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) architectures ?'. These should be completed or removed.
  3. [Figure 5(b) caption] The caption ends with 'Adapted from Ref. [ ? ]', which is an unresolved reference placeholder.
  4. [Data Availability] The DOI for Figure 1 data is listed as '10.1126/science.ade505', which appears to be missing the final zero; check against Ref. [17] (the correct DOI appears to be 10.1126/science.ade5050).
  5. [Title and Abstract] The phrase 'identical qubits' is never defined or justified in the paper; the Ti-atom qubits are identical in species but distinguished by their local environment and couplings, so the term should either be explained or qualified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation; self-citations point to published experimental results, and the molecular-qubit extension is unsupported but not circular.

full rationale

No circular step is exhibited. The review's central demonstrations (single-qubit Rabi control, CNOT and Toffoli gates) are taken from published experiments (Refs. 15, 17, 27-30), including the authors' own work, but these are external measurements with independent data, not quantities derived from inputs fitted here. The molecular-qubit extension in Sections IV-V is a prospect: the cited Refs. 24 and 25 do not demonstrate ESR-STM on molecules, so the claim is unsupported and overreaching, but an unsupported projection is not a circular reduction. Hence no self-definitional, fitted-input, or imported-uniqueness circularity is present. The nonzero score reflects only the review's heavy reliance on the authors' own prior experimental corpus, which is self-citation but not load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This review introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. The only assumptions are standard quantum mechanical modeling of weakly coupled spins and the experimental mechanisms described in prior work (e.g., spin-polarized tip driving, exchange modulation by tip electric field). These are domain assumptions rather than new axioms.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The two-qubit and three-qubit systems are well approximated by Zeeman product states (weak exchange coupling compared to detuning).
    Invoked in Section III.B and III.C to justify driving transitions between product states.
  • domain assumption The spin-polarized tip drives and reads out the qubit via tunneling magnetoresistance effects.
    Assumed in Section II without derivation, attributed to prior work.
  • domain assumption The tip electric field can modulate the exchange interaction between Fe and Ti atoms to control remote qubits.
    Stated in Section IV, based on Refs. [27,30] from the same group; not independently verified here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electron spin resonance with scanning tunneling microscopy: a tool for an on-surface quantum platform of identical qubits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R4N6VSGK

@misc{pith2026250510079,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electron spin resonance with scanning tunneling microscopy: a tool for an on-surface quantum platform of identical qubits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R4N6VSGK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10079}
}
read the original abstract

Integration of electron spin resonance (ESR) in a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) has enabled an all-electrical control of atomic and molecular spins on solid surfaces with atomic-scale precision and energy resolution beyond thermal limitations. Further, coherent manipulation and detection of individual spins in an ESR-STM establishes a powerful quantum platform, allowing for the implementation of fundamental quantum logic operations to on-surface identical qubits. In this review, we introduce recent advances of ESR-STM, focusing on its application to atomic-scale qubits and extension to molecular qubit systems. We discuss the principles underlying ESR-STM, followed by single-spin addressability, coherent control via Rabi oscillations, and quantum state readout through frequency-resolved detection. We further demonstrate multi-qubit control architectures enabled by atom manipulation and local magnetic field engineering, culminating in the realization of multi-qubit logic gates such as the Controlled-NOT and Toffoli gates. These implementations highlight the specialty of ESR-STM towards atomic-scale quantum circuits. Indeed, ESR-STM can be an excellent tool to perform and evaluate quantum operations in molecular qubits. The results reviewed in this collection establish ESR-STM as a versatile tool for advancing quantum coherent science at the atomic and molecular level in solid-state environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.10079 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. C. Three-qubit gate: Toffoli gate An experimental demonstration of a Toffoli (CCNOT) gate to a three-qubit system in ESR-STM has been realized by using three Ti atoms adsorbed onto a 2 ML MgO/Ag(100) surface ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Scheme of a scanning tunneling microscope prepared for performing pulsed ESR exper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) A scheme using the Bloch sphere illustrating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Energy diagram of a two-qubit system, illustrating its four eigenstates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Energy diagram of the eight eigenstates of a three-qubit system, composed of one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Schematic representation of molecular arrays on a surface, where individual molecules [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Mølmer , author M

    author author K. Mølmer , author M. Saffman , \ and\ author T. Pohl ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.03031 title Quantum computing with atomic qubits and rydberg interactions: Progress and challenges , \ ( year 2020 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.03031 arXiv:2011.03031 [quant-ph] NoStop

    arXiv 2011

  2. [25]

    Ardavan , author O

    author author A. Ardavan , author O. Rival , author J. J. L. \ Morton , author S. J. \ Blundell , author A. M. \ Tyryshkin , author G. A. \ Timco , \ and\ author R. E. P. \ Winpenny ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.057201 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 98 ,\ pages 057201 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.057201

  3. [32]

    Borilovic , author O

    author author I. Borilovic , author O. Roubeau , author B. L. \ Guennic , author J. van Slageren , author S. Lenz , author S. J. \ Teat , \ and\ author G. Aromí ,\ 10.1039/D2CC02605A journal journal Chemical Communications \ volume 58 ,\ pages 7530 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/d2cc02605a

  4. [1]

    Preskill ,\ 10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 journal journal Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 79 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    author author J. Preskill ,\ 10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 journal journal Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 79 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 2018

  5. [2]

    Kjaergaard , author M

    author author M. Kjaergaard , author M. E. \ Schwartz , author J. Braumüller , author P. Krantz , author J. I. J. \ Wang , author S. Gustavsson , \ and\ author W. D. \ Oliver ,\ 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605 journal journal Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics \ volume 11 ,\ pages 369 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605

  6. [3]

    Henriet , author L

    author author L. Henriet , author L. Beguin , author A. Signoles , author T. Lahaye , author A. Browaeys , author C. Jurczak , author G. Reymond , \ and\ author J. Esteve ,\ 10.22331/q-2020-12-07-332 journal journal Quantum \ volume 4 ,\ pages 332 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2020-12-07-332 2020

  7. [4]

    Veldhorst \ and\ author et al

    author author M. Veldhorst \ and\ author et al. ,\ 10.1038/s41467-017-01905-6 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 8 ,\ pages 1766 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01905-6 2017

  8. [5]

    Charbon \ and\ author et al

    author author E. Charbon \ and\ author et al. ,\ in\ 10.1109/ISSCC42613.2021.9366067 booktitle 2021 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC) \ ( year 2021 )\ pp.\ pages 304--306 NoStop

    arXiv 2021

Show all 32 references
  1. [6]

    author author C. P. P. \ Jr. ,\ @noop title Electron Spin Resonance: A Comprehensive Treatise on Experimental Techniques ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.\ ( publisher Dover Publications ,\ year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  2. [7]

    Wiesendanger ,\ @noop title Scanning Probe Microscopy and Spectroscopy: Methods and Applications \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 1994 ) NoStop

    author author R. Wiesendanger ,\ @noop title Scanning Probe Microscopy and Spectroscopy: Methods and Applications \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994

  3. [8]

    Baumann , author W

    author author S. Baumann , author W. Paul , author T. Choi , author C. P. \ Lutz , author A. Ardavan , \ and\ author A. J. \ Heinrich ,\ 10.1126/science.aac8703 journal journal Science \ volume 350 ,\ pages 417 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  4. [9]

    Choi , author W

    author author T. Choi , author W. Paul , author S. Rolf-Pissarczyk , author A. J. \ MacDonald , author F. D. \ Natterer , author K. Yang , author P. Willke , author C. P. \ Lutz , \ and\ author A. J. \ Heinrich ,\ 10.1038/nnano.2017.18 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ v...

    doi

  5. [10]

    Willke , author Y

    author author P. Willke , author Y. Bae , author K. Yang , author J. L. \ Lado , author A. Ferr \'o n , author T. Choi , author A. Ardavan , author J. Fern \'a ndez-Rossier , author A. J. \ Heinrich , \ and\ author C. P. \ Lutz ,\ 10.1126/science.aat7047 journal journal Scienc...

    doi

  6. [11]

    author author T. S. \ Seifert , author S. Kovarik , author D. M. \ Juraschek , author N. A. \ Spaldin , author P. Gambardella , \ and\ author S. Stepanow ,\ 10.1126/sciadv.abc5511 journal journal Science Advances \ volume 6 ,\ pages eabc5511 ( year 2020 ) ,\ note publisher: Am...

    doi

  7. [12]

    Zhang , author C

    author author X. Zhang , author C. Wolf , author Y. Wang , author H. Aubin , author T. Bilgeri , author P. Willke , author A. J. \ Heinrich , \ and\ author T. Choi ,\ 10.1038/s41557-021-00827-7 journal journal Nature Chemistry \ volume 14 ,\ pages 59 ( year 2022 ) ,\ note numb...

    doi

  8. [13]

    Kovarik , author R

    author author S. Kovarik , author R. Robles , author R. Schlitz , author T. S. \ Seifert , author N. Lorente , author P. Gambardella , \ and\ author S. Stepanow ,\ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00980 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 22 ,\ pages 4176 ( year 2022 ) ,\ note publish...

    doi

  9. [14]

    author author A. J. \ Heinrich , author W. D. \ Oliver , author D. Loss , \ and\ author A. Otte ,\ 10.1038/s41565-021-00949-7 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 16 ,\ pages 1318 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  10. [15]

    Yang , author N

    author author K. Yang , author N. B. \ Klingner , author B. A. \ Green , author T. Schlöder , author R. S. \ Said , author A. J. \ Baeumel , author M. A. \ Rößler , \ and\ author M. Wulfhekel ,\ 10.1126/science.aay5525 journal journal Science \ volume 366 ,\ pages 509 ( year 2...

    doi

  11. [16]

    author author L. M. \ Veldman , author J. A. J. \ Burgess , author J. van der Heijden , author C. F. \ Hirjibehedin , \ and\ author S. Loth ,\ 10.1126/science.abf7881 journal journal Science \ volume 372 ,\ pages 964 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  12. [17]

    Wang , author Y

    author author Y. Wang , author Y. Chen , author H. T. \ Bui , author C. Wolf , author M. Haze , author C. Mier , author J. Kim , author D. J. \ Choi , author C. P. \ Lutz , author Y. Bae , author S. H. \ Phark , \ and\ author A. J. \ Heinrich ,\ 10.1126/science.ade5050 journal...

    doi

  13. [18]

    author author B. M. \ Terhal ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.307 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 87 ,\ pages 307 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  14. [19]

    author author E. T. \ Campbell , author B. M. \ Terhal , \ and\ author C. Vuillot ,\ 10.1038/nature23460 journal journal Nature \ volume 549 ,\ pages 172 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  15. [20]

    Atzori \ and\ author R

    author author M. Atzori \ and\ author R. Sessoli ,\ 10.1021/jacs.9b02884 journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 141 ,\ pages 11339 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  16. [21]

    author author M. N. \ Leuenberger \ and\ author D. Loss ,\ 10.1038/35071024 journal journal Nature \ volume 410 ,\ pages 789 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  17. [22]

    Cornia , author M

    author author A. Cornia , author M. Affronte , author D. Gatteschi , author R. Sessoli , author M. Mannini , author E. Coronado , author F. Luis , author M. Malavolti , author P. Santini , \ and\ author S. Carretta ,\ 10.1038/s41570-019-0134-z journal journal Nature Reviews Ch...

    doi

  18. [23]

    Warner , author S

    author author M. Warner , author S. Din , author I. S. \ Tupitsyn , author G. W. \ Morley , author A. M. \ Stoneham , author J. A. \ Gardener , author Z. Wu , author A. J. \ Fisher , author S. Heutz , author C. W. M. \ Kay , \ and\ author G. Aeppli ,\ 10.1038/nature12636 journ...

    doi

  19. [26]

    Hill ,\ 10.1063/pt.keiz.kcmn journal journal physics today \ volume 78 ,\ pages 38 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    author author S. Hill ,\ 10.1063/pt.keiz.kcmn journal journal physics today \ volume 78 ,\ pages 38 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  20. [27]

    \ Phark , author H

    author author S.-h. \ Phark , author H. T. \ Bui , author A. Ferrón , author J. Fernández-Rossier , author J. Reina-Gálvez , author C. Wolf , author Y. Wang , author K. Yang , author A. J. \ Heinrich , \ and\ author C. P. \ Lutz ,\ 10.1002/advs.202302033 journal journal Advanc...

    doi

  21. [28]

    Wang , author M

    author author Y. Wang , author M. Haze , author H. T. \ Bui , author W.-h. \ Soe , author H. Aubin , author A. Ardavan , author A. J. \ Heinrich , \ and\ author S.-h. \ Phark ,\ 10.1038/s41534-023-00716-6 journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1 ( year 202...

    doi

  22. [29]

    author author H. T. \ Bui , author C. Wolf , author Y. Wang , author M. Haze , author A. Ardavan , author A. J. \ Heinrich , \ and\ author S.-h. \ Phark ,\ 10.1021/acsnano.4c00196 journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 18 ,\ pages 12187 ( year 2024 ) ,\ note publisher: American Che...

    doi

  23. [30]

    Reina-Gálvez , author H.-A

    author author J. Reina-Gálvez , author H.-A. \ Le , author H. T. \ Bui , author S.-h. \ Phark , author N. Lorente , \ and\ author C. Wolf ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2408.07289 title Efficient driving of a spin-qubit using single-atom magnets , \ ( year 2024 ),\ note arXiv:2408.07289 [c...

    doi

  24. [31]

    author author L. A. \ Barrios , author D. Aguilà , author O. Roubeau , author P. Gamez , author J. Ribas-Ariño , author S. J. \ Teat , \ and\ author G. Aromí ,\ 10.1002/chem.200902089 journal journal Chemistry—A European Journal \ volume 15 ,\ pages 11235 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.