Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Not All Thoughts are Generated Equal: Efficient LLM Reasoning via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.11827 v2 pith:JEUWW4EP submitted 2025-05-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords reasoningthoughtsllmslongefficiencylong-thoughtproposeshort-thought
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Compressing long chain-of-thought (CoT) from large language models (LLMs) is an emerging strategy to improve the reasoning efficiency of LLMs. Despite its promising benefits, existing studies equally compress all thoughts within a long CoT, hindering more concise and effective reasoning. To this end, we first investigate the importance of different thoughts by examining their effectiveness and efficiency in contributing to reasoning through automatic long CoT chunking and Monte Carlo rollouts. Building upon the insights, we propose a theoretically bounded metric to jointly measure the effectiveness and efficiency of different thoughts. We then propose Long$\otimes$Short, an efficient reasoning framework that enables two LLMs to collaboratively solve the problem: a long-thought LLM for more effectively generating important thoughts, while a short-thought LLM for efficiently generating remaining thoughts. Specifically, we begin by synthesizing a small amount of cold-start data to fine-tune LLMs for long-thought and short-thought reasoning styles, respectively. Furthermore, we propose a synergizing-oriented multi-turn reinforcement learning, focusing on the model self-evolution and collaboration between long-thought and short-thought LLMs. Experimental results show that our method enables Qwen2.5-7B and Llama3.1-8B to achieve comparable performance compared to DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B, while reducing token length by over 80% across the MATH500, AIME24/25, AMC23, and GPQA Diamond benchmarks. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/usail-hkust/LongShort.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the Cost and Benefit of Chain of Thought: A Learning-Theoretic Perspective

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Chain of Thought risk decomposes into oracle-trajectory benefit and trajectory-mismatch cost, with stability determining bounded, linear, or exponential error growth.

  2. Post Reasoning: Improving the Performance of Non-Thinking Models at No Cost

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Post-Reasoning boosts LLM accuracy by reversing the usual answer-after-reasoning order, delivering mean relative gains of 17.37% across 117 model-benchmark pairs with zero extra cost.

  3. Chained Recursive Language Models for Multi-Iteration Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Chained fresh-root model calls with plain-text artifacts improve reported long-context reasoning accuracy over a single-call baseline, but the evidence lacks error bars and compute-matched comparison.

  4. Pushing Forward Pareto Frontiers of Proactive Agents with Behavioral Agentic Optimization

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BAO, a behavior-enhanced SFT plus regularized RL pipeline, improves proactive agents' task performance while lowering user-involvement rate, beating UserRL baselines on three UserRL gym tasks.

  5. Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-03 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey organizing techniques to achieve efficient reasoning in LLMs by shortening chain-of-thought outputs.

Pith tools