Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 69 references

Soft superconductivity in covalent bismuth dihydride BiH$_2$ under extreme conditions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that covalent bismuth dihydride BiH$_2$ superconducts up to 70 K yet stays 'soft': an unusually high Fermi velocity of about $1.1 \times 10^6$ m/s keeps its upper critical field at only 12–16 T.

desk verdict New low-Hc2 hydride transport data worth knowing, but the P21/m-BiH2 phase assignment is not secured and the two-gap evidence collapses under its own uncertainty. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12062 v4 pith:G46ZZYIL submitted 2025-05-17 cond-mat.supr-con physics.class-ph

Jianning Guo , Dmitrii V. Semenok , Ivan A. Troyan , Di Zhou , Yulong Wang , Yuzhi Chen , Su Chen , Kexin Zhang
show 9 more authors
Xinyue Wu Sven Luther Toni Helm Andrey V Sadakov Alexey S. Usoltsev Leonid A Morgun Vladimir M Pudalov Viktor V Struzhkin Xiaoli Huang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-conphysics.class-ph
keywords bismuthdihydridehydridesuperconductorsuppercriticalfieldFermivelocitysoftsuperconductorhighpressuresynthesistwo-gapsuperconductivityWHHtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Under pressures of 157–211 GPa, bismuth reacts with hydrogen to form the covalent dihydride BiH$_2$, whose superconducting transition reaches 70 K — the highest $T_c$ of any MH$_2$-type hydride apart from H$_2$S. The paper's central claim is that this superconductor is 'soft': its upper critical field $\mu_0 H_{c2}(0) = 12$–16 T is several times smaller than that of clathrate-like metal hydrides (LaH$_{10}$, CaH$_6$) with comparable or even lower transition temperatures. The explanation offered is an unexpectedly high Fermi velocity, $v_F \approx 1.1 \times 10^6$ m/s at 155 GPa, three to five times the value typical of hydrogen-dominated hydrides, which suppresses the critical field through the WHH/Maki relation even though $T_c$ is high. If correct, this decouples the 'softness' of a hydride superconductor from its transition temperature and makes BiH$_2$ a test case for how the electronic structure of the heavy-element sublattice governs the response to magnetic fields. Pulsed critical-current measurements additionally indicate two $s$-wave superconducting gaps, with the large gap $\Delta_L(0) = 6.9 \pm 1.2$ meV.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Fermi velocity $v_F \approx 1.1 \times 10^6$ m/s entering the Maki parameter $\alpha = 3\hbar/(2 m l_e v_F)$ of WHH theory: with bismuth $p$ orbitals dominating the density of states at the Fermi level instead of hydrogen $s$ orbitals, $v_F$ is three to five times larger than the $2.5$–$3.8 \times 10^5$ m/s baseline of hydrogen-dominated polyhydrides, and the larger velocity suppresses $-\mathrm{d}H_{c2}/\mathrm{d}T$ at $T_c$ and hence $H_{c2}(0)$. A second mechanism carries the gap analysis: the self-field critical-current model converts the measured $J_c(T)$ curve into a penetration depth and fits it against single-gap, two-gap $s$-wave, and $d$-wave forms, yielding the two-gap result $\Delta_L(0) = 6.9 \pm 1.2$ meV and $\Delta_S(0) \approx 1.5$ meV. The structural object is the low-symmetry $P2_1/m$ phase whose hydrogen sublattice is an ordered array of H$_2$ molecules; the calculated $T_c$ of this phase ($\approx 59$ K at 150 GPa) brackets the measured 61–70 K, whereas dynamically unstable chain-like Cmcm-BiH$_2$ would give $\approx 85$ K and disordered molecular variants only $\approx 34$ K.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be a single-phase, hydrogen-sublattice-resolved sample: neutron or very-high-resolution synchrotron diffraction of deuterated BiD$_2$ that identifies the sublattice as $P2_1/m$, together with a single sharp resistive drop at 61–70 K and $\mu_0 H_{c2}(0) \approx 12$–16 T. The phase assignment would fail if the 70 K step survives with an upper critical field above 30 T once BiH$_4$ and $C2/m$-BiH$_2$ contributions are excluded, or if specific-heat or tunneling measurements find no gap near the predicted $\Delta_L(0) = 6.9$ meV.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the low-symmetry molecular phase $P2_1/m$-BiH$_2$, synthesized by laser-heating bismuth with ammonia borane at 157–211 GPa, superconducts with a maximum $T_c$ of 70 K around 159 GPa. Transport measurements in steady fields up to 16 T and pulsed fields up to 50 T give $\mu_0 H_{c2}(0) = 12$–16 T for the BiH$_2$-bearing samples, with 10.5 T measured directly at 2 K in the pulsed experiment, corresponding to $\mu_0 H_{c2}/T_c \approx 0.16$ T/K. Using the WHH framework, the authors trace this small critical field to the Maki parameter: because the Fermi level in BiH$_2$ is dominated by bismuth $p$ orbitals rather than hydrogen states, the Fermi velocity reaches $v_F \approx 1.1 \times 10^6$ m/s at 155 GPa, three to five times the value in most polyhydrides, and a high $v_F$ drives down both the slope $\mathrm{d}H_{c2}/\mathrm{d}T$ at $T_c$ and the zero-temperature critical field. On this basis the paper classifies BiH$_2$ as a 'soft' molecular superconducting hydride with relatively weak vortex pinning, in contrast to hard clathrate hydrides of similar $T_c$ such as Lu$_4$H$_{23}$ or CeH$_9$. Pulsed-mode voltage–current characteristics add a critical current density $J_c(0) \approx 10$ kA/mm$^2$ whose temperature dependence is best described by a two-gap $s$-wave model with $\Delta_L(0) = 6.9 \pm 1.2$ meV and $\Delta_S(0) \approx 1.5$ meV.

Load-bearing premise

The measured 61–70 K resistive transition and its 12–16 T upper critical field are assigned to the low-symmetry $P2_1/m$-BiH$_2$ phase, even though X-ray diffraction shows the samples contain more than 95% unreacted bismuth together with a mixture of $P2_1/m$-BiH$_2$, $C2/m$-BiH$_2$, and BiH$_4$, and the hydrogen sublattice itself ('probably $P2_1/m$') cannot be resolved by XRD.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • BiH$_2$ becomes the softest high-$T_c$ hydride known: with $T_c \approx 70$ K but $\mu_0 H_{c2}(0) = 12$–16 T, moderate laboratory fields fully suppress its superconductivity, and the ratio $\mu_0 H_{c2}/T_c \approx 0.16$ T/K sits far below the 0.5–1.2 T/K of clathrate hydrides such as LaH$_{10}$ and CaH$_6$.
  • Fermi velocity, not $T_c$ alone, sets the critical field: p-element covalent hydrides with high $v_F$ should systematically behave as soft superconductors, giving a concrete electronic-structure criterion for predicting $H_{c2}$ in future hydride searches.
  • BiH$_2$ is a multiband superconductor with two $s$-wave gaps, $\Delta_L(0) = 6.9 \pm 1.2$ meV and $\Delta_S(0) \approx 1.5$ meV, a structure that specific-heat, tunneling, and lower-critical-field experiments could independently verify.
  • The ordering of H$_2$ molecules in the sublattice is a strong $T_c$ lever — from about 85 K for unstable chain-like Cmcm down to about 34 K for disordered molecular variants — so the observed $T_c$ reads out the degree of hydrogen-sublattice order, not just stoichiometry.
  • Weak vortex pinning means currents near 0.14–0.16 A quench superconductivity in BiH$_2$, a practical constraint on any future transport measurement in molecular hydride samples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: applied to the whole p-block family (SnH$_4$, SbH$_4$, P–H systems), the same Fermi-velocity argument predicts persistently low $H_{c2}/T_c$ ratios, so the soft-versus-hard split offers a cheap screening rule — compute $v_F$, not just $T_c$, when ranking candidate megabar superconductors.
  • Editorial inference: the Fermi surface of $P2_1/m$-BiH$_2$ is dominated by quasi-two-dimensional sheets with velocities near $1.0$–$1.4 \times 10^6$ m/s, so at low fields and high current densities the sample may exhibit two-dimensional fluctuation or depairing physics that this paper does not address.
  • Editorial inference: because bismuth states, not hydrogen, dominate the Fermi level, pairing should depend mainly on the heavy-atom sublattice; a deuteration experiment (BiD$_2$) offers a sharp test, since a small isotope shift in $T_c$ or $H_{c2}$ would confirm the marginal role of hydrogen phonons.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports high-pressure synthesis and transport measurements of bismuth hydride samples made from Bi and ammonia borane in laser-heated diamond anvil cells at pressures of 157–211 GPa. Resistive transitions at 61–70 K are attributed to the low-symmetry P21/m-BiH2 phase, and steady-field (0–16 T) and pulsed-field (0–50 T) measurements yield upper critical fields μ0Hc2(0) = 12–16 T, which the authors identify as unusually low for a hydride superconductor with Tc near 70 K. Using DFT with spin–orbit coupling they compute a high Fermi velocity VF ≈ 1.1×10^6 m/s for P21/m-BiH2 and argue that this high electron velocity, rather than Tc alone, explains the low Hc2 and classifies BiH2 as a soft molecular superconducting hydride with weak vortex pinning. Critical-current density data Jc(T) were measured by a pulsed current technique; a Talantsev–Tallon fit is claimed to show two s-wave gaps, ΔL(0) = 6.9 ± 1.2 meV and ΔS(0) = 1.5 ± 9.4 meV.

Significance. If the phase assignment is correct, this is a valuable counterexample to the usual correlation between high Tc and high Hc2 in hydride superconductors, supporting a soft/hard classification based on Fermi velocity rather than Tc alone. The experiment is technically demanding: pulsed magnetic fields, four-probe van der Pauw transport, and critical-current measurements in laser-heated DACs at megabar pressures. The DFT Fermi velocity is not a fitted parameter, and the low Hc2 is directly measured, so the core 'soft superconductor' classification rests on a testable, non-circular basis. However, the strength of the conclusions depends critically on identifying the phase that actually carries the measured superconducting signal, and that identification is not established from the reported XRD data.

major comments (3)
  1. [X-ray diffraction measurements (main text; Fig. 2; Fig. S8)] The phase attribution of the superconducting signal is not secured. In DAC B1 the text states that the hydrogen sublattice is 'probably P21/m', and the XRD patterns contain a third series of reflections that 'may correspond' to C2/m-BiH2; in DAC B3, Fig. S8 explicitly lists P21/m-BiH2, C2/m-BiH2, and C2/c-BiH4 alongside more than 95% unreacted bcc-Bi. Since the transport measurements are bulk measurements over the whole sample, the 61–70 K transitions, the 12–16 T Hc2 values, and the Jc(T) data could be dominated by C2/m-BiH2 (whose parent Cmcm structure the authors themselves compute to have Tc ≈ 85 K), by BiH4 remnants, or by grain-boundary/interface channels. This is load-bearing for the central claim that P21/m-BiH2 is a soft superconductor with VF ≈ 1.1×10^6 m/s; please provide phase-specific evidence, for example transport on a region identified as single-phase P21/m-BiH2, or a quantitative multi-phase model showing that the P21/m phase dominates the current path.
  2. [Critical current measurements and Supporting Information §4] The two-gap s-wave conclusion is not statistically supported. The small gap is reported as ΔS(0) = 1.5 ± 9.4 meV, i.e., consistent with zero within one standard deviation, and the Supporting Information lists Δ(0), λ(0), ΔC/C, and the sample cross-section as refined parameters in the same Talantsev–Tallon fit used to infer the gaps. The claim 'best described only by including a small additional gap' therefore overstates the evidence. Please provide a proper model comparison (e.g., χ², Akaike weights, parameter covariances) or rephrase the conclusion to state that the data are consistent with a single-gap anisotropic s-wave model and that the second gap is not resolved.
  3. [Electrical transport measurements under strong magnetic fields (Fig. 3a,b; Discussion)] The extraction and assignment of the two hydride upper-critical-field values (12 T and 16 T) is not transparent. The Discussion states 'for C2/m and P21/m-BiH2 we obtained 12 and 16 T', but the displayed R(T,H) data in Fig. 3 do not clearly resolve two distinct hydride transitions, and the text does not specify which data sets or transition criteria give which value. Please clarify how the 12 T and 16 T values are separated, which phase each is assigned to, and how cross-contamination from the coexisting phases is excluded.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Critical current measurements] The abstract gives ΔS(0) ~ 1.5 meV without the uncertainty, while the body reports ΔS(0) = 1.5 ± 9.4 meV; please include the uncertainty or soften the statement in the abstract.
  2. [Caption of Fig. 3] The caption says the panels show BiH2 in 'DAC B1 and B2', but the main text states that steady-field measurements were performed on DACs B1 and B3; please correct the inconsistency.
  3. [Introduction] The phrase 'The R-H Measurements under pulsed magnetic fields' should read 'Resistance–magnetic field (R–H) measurements' or similar.
  4. [Electrical transport measurements under strong magnetic fields] The acronym WHH is used without definition; please expand it at first use as Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg.
  5. [Discussion (Eq. 1)] In Eq. (1), the symbols τ, le, and m are not all defined at the point of use; please define the electron mean free path, scattering time, and electron mass explicitly.
  6. [Discussion] The sentence 'This results in broader superconducting transitions and typically higher µ0Hc2(0) values for metal hydrides' has an unclear antecedent for 'This'; please rephrase to specify the cause (e.g., strong vortex pinning from impurities/defects).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The two-gap ΔL/ΔS result is a Talantsev–Tallon fit parameter restated as a finding; the soft-superconductor Hc2 claim is independent, so circularity is partial.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, 'Critical current measurements...' paragraph; Fig. 3E; Supporting Information Sec. 4, eq. (1)]
    "Applying the Talantsev-Tallon model(40, 41), we found that BiH2 exhibits s-wave superconductivity, which can be best described only by including a small additional gap Δs(0) = 1.5 ± 9.4 meV in addition to the main gap ΔL(0) = 6.9 ± 1.2 meV. ... In these equations, parameters b, Δ(0), λ(0) and ΔC/C are refined parameters."

    The Talantsev–Tallon self-field critical-current formula is used to fit the measured Jc(T) curve, with Δ(0) (both gaps), λ(0), and ΔC/C as free refinement parameters. The same fitted values are then presented as the experimental determination of two s-wave superconducting gaps in BiH2. This is a fitted input called a prediction: the 'two-gap' structure is not independently measured (e.g., by tunneling) but is the outcome of a multiparameter model applied to the same Jc(T) it explains. The quoted small gap has uncertainty 1.5 ± 9.4 meV, so the data do not statistically require it. However, the unrelated low-Hc2 soft-superconductor claim rests on direct Hc2 measurements and a DFT Fermi velocity, not on this fit, so the circularity is confined to the gap claim.

full rationale

The paper's central claim that P21/m-BiH2 is a soft superconducting hydride with Tc ≈ 70 K, μ0Hc2(0) = 12–16 T, and VF ≈ 1.1×10^6 m/s rests on direct resistive-transition measurements, WHH fits to Hc2 data, pulsed-field data, and DFT Fermi-velocity calculations that are not fitted to the resistance data. Those elements are not circular: low Hc2 is an experimental observation and the Fermi velocity is computed from the band structure independently of the transport fit. The clear reduction-by-construction is the two-gap result: the Jc(T) data are fitted with the Talantsev–Tallon model, whose Δ values are refined parameters, and the fit result is then announced as the presence of two s-wave gaps, despite the small gap's uncertainty encompassing zero. The phase assignment to P21/m is admittedly uncertain ('probably P21/m', with C2/m-BiH2 and >95% unreacted Bi present), but that is a phase-identification/correctness issue, not a circular derivational step. Self-citations are used for context and magnetoresistance comparison and are not load-bearing. Since one advertised result (two gaps) reduces to fitted parameters of the same data while the principal soft-superconductor conclusion retains independent content, a partial circularity score of 6 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a phase assignment (XRD plus DFT), a WHH extrapolation, and a four-parameter critical-current fit. The two extracted gaps are fitted values, not independent measurements, and the small gap carries an enormous uncertainty. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • Large gap ΔL(0) = 6.9 ± 1.2 meV
    Refined parameter in the Talantsev-Tallon fit to the Jc(T) data; presented in the abstract as an experimental gap.
  • Small gap ΔS(0) = 1.5 ± 9.4 meV (abstract quotes ~1.5 meV)
    Second refined gap in the two-gap s-wave fit; the uncertainty exceeds the value, so the second gap is not statistically significant.
  • London penetration depth λ(0) = not reported
    Listed as a refined parameter in the Supporting Information fit model; no value is given.
  • Specific heat jump ΔC/C = not reported
    Listed as a refined parameter in the Supporting Information fit model; no value is given.
  • Sample cross-section for Jc conversion = 2×7 µm² (near-electrode space)
    Jc(0)=10 kA/mm² is obtained by dividing the measured current by this estimated area; an error in this area directly scales the quoted Jc.
  • Coulomb pseudopotential μ* = 0.1
    Chosen by hand for the Allen-Dynes Tc estimates in Figure 4; standard in the field but a free input that directly affects calculated Tc values.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The 61-70 K superconducting transitions originate from P21/m-BiH2.
    XRD cannot distinguish the hydrogen sublattice; samples contain bcc-Bi, C2/m-BiH2 and BiH4. The assignment is an inference, partly from the predicted Tc of about 59 K (ref 25).
  • domain assumption Single-band WHH scaling describes Hc2(T) for the measured phases.
    Used to extrapolate Hc2(0)=12-16 T and 27 T from data up to 16 T; no check of single-band or dirty-limit conditions is reported.
  • domain assumption The Talantsev-Tallon self-field critical current model correctly links Jc(T) to superconducting gaps.
    The gap values are extracted from this phenomenological model with four adjustable parameters; the model is from the cited literature, not independently validated here.
  • domain assumption The DFT band structure of ideal P21/m-BiH2 at 155 GPa gives the Fermi velocity of the real sample.
    VF≈1.1×10^6 m/s is computed for the ideal structure with SOC, while the measured sample is a multiphase mixture with more than 95% unreacted Bi.
  • domain assumption Pressure reading from diamond-edge and hydrogen-vibron Raman is accurate enough for phase comparison.
    DAC B1 is quoted as 159 GPa by XRD but about 140 GPa by H2 Raman; the paper acknowledges the discrepancy and proceeds with both labels.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Soft superconductivity in covalent bismuth dihydride BiH$_2$ under extreme conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G46ZZYIL

@misc{pith2026250512062,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Soft superconductivity in covalent bismuth dihydride BiH$_2$ under extreme conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G46ZZYIL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12062}
}
abstract

Strong magnetic fields provide a unique environment for investigating the fundamental properties of superconducting materials, especially for hydride superconductors with large upper critical fields. Following this idea, we have investigated the effect of pulsed magnetic fields on covalent bismuth dihydride (BiH$_2$), successfully synthesized under pressure up to 211 GPa. The electrical resistance measurements indicate that the superconducting phase $P2_1/m$-BiH$_2$ exhibits the highest superconducting critical temperature ($T_c$) of 70 K among MH$_2$-type hydride apart from H$_2$S. The electrical transport experiments under both pulsed (up to 50 T) and steady magnetic fields (up to 16 T) for $P2_1/m$- and $C2/m$-BiH$_2$ indicate that the upper critical fields $\mu_0 H_{c2}(0)$ = 12--16 T are unusually low, much lower than that of clathrate-like metal polyhydrides with similar $T_c$. This is due to the unexpectedly high Fermi velocity in BiH$_2$, about $1.1 \times 10^6$ m/s, which allows to classify BiH$_2$ as a 'soft' molecular superconducting hydride with relatively weak vortex pinning. Measurements of the current-voltage characteristics in the pulsed mode make it possible to experimentally establish the temperature dependence of the critical current density (the maximum $J_c(0) = 10$ kA/mm$^2$), which indicates the presence of two $s$-wave superconducting gaps in BiH$_2$ at 172--176 GPa: $\Delta_L(0) = 6.9 \pm 1.2$ meV and $\Delta_S(0) \sim 1.5$ meV.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12062 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Electrical transport study of BiHx samples at different pressures. (A), (B), and (C) Dependence of the electrical resistance on temperature and superconducting critical temperature (Tc) on pressure for the Bi-H system in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of the DAC B1 and B3 samples at 159 GPa (140 GPa according to the hydrogen Raman shift), and 176 GPa, respectively. a) Experimental pattern (blue circles), Le Bail refinement of the unit cell parameters (red line), and the residual signal (orange line). b) Typical spot-like diffraction pattern of sample in DAC B1, indicating a rather large (1-10 µm) crystallite size of BiH2. There is also … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Experiments with bismuth hydrides in steady and pulsed magnetic fields. (A) and (B) The temperature dependence of electrical resistance of BiH2 (DAC B1 and B2) under applied magnetic fields. (C) Critical magnetic fields obtained by fitting the experimental data with WHH equation under both pulsed and steady-state magnetic fields. ( D) Voltage-current characteristics of BiH2 at 172 GPa in the temperature range from 4… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Calculations of superconducting properties and electron density of states in BiH2. Eliashberg function of (A) Cmcm-BiH2, and (C) P1-BiH2 at 155 GPa. The green curve corresponds to the critical temperature calculated by the Allen-Dynes formula with the Coulomb pseudopot…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. K. Onnes, The superconductivity of mercury. Comm Phys Lab Univ Leiden, 122-124 (1911)

    work page 1911

  2. [2]

    spotty” character, which corresponds to large microcrystals of bismuth hydrides, and 5 contain at least three series of reflections. The first series (single diffraction line “Bi

    have a pronounced “spotty” character, which corresponds to large microcrystals of bismuth hydrides, and 5 contain at least three series of reflections. The first series (single diffraction line “Bi” in Figure 2b) corresponds to bcc-Bi (or Bi-V), which remains stable up to 300 GPa (30, 31). The volume of the found bcc-Bi unit cell VBi = 16.93 Å 3/Bi turns ...

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    A. P. Drozdov, P. P. Kong, V . S. Minkov, S. P. Besedin, M. A. Kuzovnikov, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. F. Balakirev, D. E. Graf, V . B. Prakapenka, E. Greenberg, D. A. Knyazev, M. Tkacz, M. I. Eremets, Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures. Nature 569, 528-531 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    P. Kong, V . S. Minkov, M. A. Kuzovnikov, A. P. Drozdov, S. P. Besedin, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. F. Balakirev, V . B. Prakapenka, S. Chariton, D. A. Knyazev, E. Greenberg, M. I. Eremets, Superconductivity up to 243 K in the yttrium -hydrogen system under high pressure. Nature Communications 12, 5075 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    I. A. Troyan, D. V . Semenok, A. G. Kvashnin, A. V . Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, V . M. Pudalov, A. G. Ivanova, V . B. Prakapenka, E. Greenberg, A. G. Gavriliuk, I. S. Lyubutin, V . V . Struzhkin, A. Bergara, I. Errea, R. Bianco, M. Calandra, F. Mauri, L. Monacelli, R. Akashi, A. R. Oganov, Anomalous High-Temperature Superconductivity in YH6. Adv Mater 33...

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    D. V . Semenok, A. G. Kvashnin, A. G. Ivanova, V . Svitlyk, V . Y . Fominski, A. V . Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, V . M. Pudalov, I. A. Troyan, A. R. Oganov, Superconductivity at 161 K in thorium hydride ThH10: Synthesis and properties. Materials Today 33, 36-44 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    L. Ma, K. Wang, Y . Xie, X. Yang, Y . Wang, M. Zhou, H. Liu, X. Yu, Y . Zhao, H. Wang, G. Liu, Y . Ma, High-Temperature Superconducting Phase in Clathrate Calcium Hydride ${\mathrm{CaH}}_{6}$ up to 215 K at a Pressure of 172 GPa. Physical Review Letters 128, 167001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Z. Li, X. He, C. Zhang, X. Wang, S. Zhang, Y . Jia, S. Feng, K. Lu, J. Zhao, J. Zhang, B. Min, Y . Long, R. Yu, L. Wang, M. Ye, Z. Zhang, V . Prakapenka, S. Chariton, P. A. Ginsberg, J. Bass, S. Yuan, H. Liu, C. Jin, Superconductivity above 200 K discovered in superhydrides of calcium. Nature Communications 13, 2863 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    J. Bi, Y . Nakamoto, P. Zhang, Y . Wang, L. Ma, Y . Wang, B. Zou, K. Shimizu, H. Liu, M. Zhou, H. Wang, G. Liu, Y . Ma, Stabilization of superconductive La -Y alloy superhydride with Tc above 90 K at megabar pressure. Mater. Today Phys., 100840 (2022). 13

    2022

  2. [10]

    M. Shao, W. Chen, K. Zhang, X. Huang, T. Cui, High -pressure synthesis of superconducting clathratelike YH4. Phys. Rev. B 104, 174509 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    J. Guo, D. Semenok, G. Shutov, D. Zhou, S. Chen, Y . Wang, K. Zhang, X. Wu, S. Luther, T. Helm, X. Huang, T. Cui, Unusual metallic state in superconducting A15-type La4H23. National Science Review, (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Cross, J

    S. Cross, J. Buhot, A. Brooks, W. Thomas, A. Kleppe, O. Lord, S. Friedemann, High - temperature superconductivity in ${ \mathrm{La}}_{4}{\mathrm{H}}_{23}$ below 100 GPa. Physical Review B 109, L020503 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    W. Chen, D. V . Semenok, X. Huang, H. Shu, X. Li, D. Duan, T. Cui, A. R. Oganov, High-Temperature Superconducting Phases in Cerium Superhydride with a ${T}_{c}$ up to 115 K below a Pressure of 1 Megabar. Physical Review Letters 127, 117001 (2021)

    2021

  6. [15]

    D. V . Semenok, I. A. Kruglov, I. A. Savkin, A. G. Kvashnin, A. R. Oganov, On Distribution of Superconductivity in Metal Hydrides. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 24, 100808-100817 (2020)

    2020

  7. [16]

    A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, I. A. Troyan, V . Ksenofontov, S. I. Shylin, Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature 525, 73-76 (2015)

    2015

  8. [17]

    F. Hong, P. F. Shan, L. X. Yang, B. B. Yue, P. T. Yang, Z. Y . Liu, J. P. Sun, J. H. Dai, H. Yu, Y . Y . Yin, X. H. Yu, J. G. Cheng, Z. X. Zhao, Possible superconductivity at ∼70 K in tin hydride SnHx under high pressure. Materials Today Physics 22, 100596 (2022)

    2022

  9. [18]

    I. A. Troyan, D. V . Semenok, A. G. Ivanova, A. V . Sadakov, D. Zhou, A. G. Kvashnin, I. A. Kruglov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, M. V . Lyubutina, D. S. Perekalin, T. Helm, S. W. Tozer, M. Bykov, A. F. Goncharov, V . M. Pudalov, I. S. Lyubutin, Non ‐Fermi‐Liquid Behavior of Superconduc...

    2023

  10. [19]

    K. Lu, X. He, C. Zhang, Z. Li, S. Zhang, B. Min, J. Zhang, J. Zhao, L. Shi, Y . Peng, S. Feng, Q. Liu, J. Song, R. Yu, X. Wang, Y . Wang, M. Bykov, C. Jin, Superconductivity with Tc of 116 K discovered in antimony polyhydrides. National Science Review 11, (2023)

    2023

  11. [20]

    P. Shan, L. Ma, X. Yang, M. Li, Z. Liu, J. Hou, S. Jiang, L. Zhang, L. Shi, P. Yang, C. Lin, B. Wang, J. Sun, H. Guo, Y . Ding, H. Gou, Z. Zhao, J. Cheng, Molecular Hydride Superconductor BiH4 with Tc up to 91 K at 170 GPa. Journal of the American Chemical Society, (2024)

    2024

  12. [21]

    Gilchrist, C

    J. Gilchrist, C. J. van der Beek, Nonlinear diffusion in hard and soft superconductors. Physica C: Superconductivity 231, 147-156 (1994)

    1994

  13. [22]

    C. P. Bean, Magnetization of Hard Superconductors. Physical review letters 8, 250-253 14 (1962)

    1962

  14. [23]

    J. Bi, Y . Nakamoto, P . Zhang, K. Shimizu, B. Zou, H. Liu, M. Zhou, G. Liu, H. Wang, Y . Ma, Giant enhancement of superconducting critical temperature in substitutional alloy (La,Ce)H9. Nat. Commun. 13, 5952 (2022)

    2022

  15. [24]

    W. Chen, X. Huang, D. V . Semenok, S. Chen, D. Zhou, K. Zhang, A. R. Oganov, T. Cui, Enhancement of superconducting critical temperature realized in La -Ce-H system at moderate pressures. Nat. Commun. 14, 2660 (2023)

    2023

  16. [25]

    D. V . Semenok, I. A. Troyan, D. Zhou, A. V . Sadakov, K. S. Pervakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, A. G. Ivanova, M. Galasso, F. G. Alabarse, W. Chen, Ternary superhydrides under pressure of Anderson's theorem: Near -record superconductivity in (La, Sc) H 12. arXiv:2408.07477, (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  17. [26]

    D. D. Yanbin Ma, Da Li, Yunxian Liu, Fubo Tian, Hongyu Yu, Chunhong Xu, Ziji Shao, Bingbing Liu, Tian Cui, High -pressure structures and superconductivity of bismuth hydrides. arXiv:1511.05291v1, (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  18. [27]

    K. Abe, N. W. Ashcroft, Stabilization and highly metallic properties of heavy group-V hydrides at high pressures. Physical Review B 92, 224109 (2015)

    2015

  19. [28]

    Zhang, J

    Y . Zhang, J. Gouchi, K. Ishigaki, S. Nagasaki, Z. Shi, Y . Uwatoko, Abnormal transport properties of Bi -III superconducting phase in pressurized bismuth single crystal. Superconductor Science and Technology 34, 075009 (2021)

    2021

  20. [29]

    Y . Li, E. Wang, X. Zhu, H.-H. Wen, Pressure-induced superconductivity in Bi single crystals. Physical Review B 95, 024510 (2017)

    2017

  21. [30]

    P. W. Phillips, N. E. Hussey, P. Abbamonte, Stranger than metals. Science 377, eabh4273

  22. [31]

    C. V . Storm, J. D. McHardy, M. J. Duff, S. G. MacLeod, E. F. O’Bannon, III, M. I. McMahon, The stress state in bismuth to 298 GPa and its use as a pressure transmitting medium and pressure marker at multi -megabar pressures. Journal of Applied Physics 133, (2023)

    2023

  23. [32]

    Akahama, H

    Y . Akahama, H. Kawamura, A. K. Singh, Equation of state of bismuth to 222 GPa and comparison of gold and platinum pressure scales to 145 GPa. Journal of Applied Physics 92, 5892-5897 (2002)

    2002

  24. [33]

    R. T. Howie, C. L. Guillaume, T. Scheler, A. F. Goncharov, E. Gregoryanz, Mixed Molecular and Atomic Phase of Dense Hydrogen. Physical Review Letters 108, 125501 (2012)

    2012

  25. [34]

    Baumgartner, M

    T. Baumgartner, M. Eisterer, H. W. Weber, R. Flükiger, C. Scheuerlein, L. Bottura, Effects of neutron irradiation on pinning force scaling in state -of-the-art Nb3Sn wires. Superconductor Science and Technology 27, (2014)

    2014

  26. [35]

    Z. Li, X. He, C. Zhang, K. Lu, B. Min, J. Zhang, S. Zhang, J. Zhao, L. Shi, Y . Peng, S. Feng, Z. Deng, J. Song, Q. Liu, X. Wang, R. Yu, L. Wang, Y . Li, J. D. Bass, V . Prakapenka, S. Chariton, H. Liu, C. Jin, Superconductivity above 70 K observed in lutetium polyhydrides. Sc...

    2023

  27. [36]

    J. Guo, G. Shutov, S. Chen, Y . Wang, D. Zhou, T. Cui, X. Huang, D. Semenok, 15 Stabilization of high-temperature superconducting A15 phase La 4H23 below 100 GPa. Natl. Sci. Rev., nwae149 (2024)

    2024

  28. [37]

    Z. Li, X. He, C. Zhang, K. Lu, B. Min, J. Zhang, S. Zhang, J. Zhao, L. Shi, Y . Peng, S. Feng, Z. Deng, J. Song, Q. Liu, X. Wang, R. Yu, L. Wang, Y . Li, J. D. Bass, V . Prakapenka, S. Chariton, H. Liu, C. Jin, Superconductivity above 70 K observed in lutetium polyhydrides. Sc...

    2023

  29. [38]

    Semenok, J

    D. Semenok, J. Guo, D. Zhou, W. Chen, T. Helm, A. Kvashnin, A. Sadakov, O. Sobolevsky, V . Pudalov, V . Struzhkin, C. Xi, X. Huang, I. Troyan, Evidence for Pseudogap Phase in Cerium Superhydrides: CeH 10 and CeH 9. arXiv:2307.11742v2, (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  30. [39]

    E. F. Talantsev, In-Field Transport Critical Currents in Superhydride Superconductors: Highly-Compressed CeH9. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 34, 1-4 (2024)

    2024

  31. [40]

    V . S. Minkov, V . Ksenofontov, S. L. Bud’ko, E. F. Talantsev, M. I. Eremets, Magnetic flux trapping in hydrogen -rich high-temperature superconductors. Nature Physics 19, 1293-1300 (2023)

    2023

  32. [41]

    Talantsev, W

    E. Talantsev, W. P. Crump, J. L. Tallon, Thermodynamic Parameters of Single- or Multi- Band Superconductors Derived from Self -Field Critical Currents. Annalen der Physik 529, 1700197 (2017)

    2017

  33. [42]

    E. F. Talantsev, J. L. Tallon, Universal self -field critical current for thin -film superconductors. Nature Communications 6, 7820 (2015)

    2015

  34. [43]

    Laniel, B

    D. Laniel, B. Winkler, T. Fedotenko, A. Pakhomova, S. Chariton, V . Milman, V . Prakapenka, L. Dubrovinsky, N. Dubrovinskaia, High -Pressure Polymeric Nitrogen Allotrope with the Black Phosphorus Structure. Physical review letters 124, 216001 (2020)

    2020

  35. [44]

    Gonze, J

    X. Gonze, J. P. Michenaud, J. P. Vigneron, Ab initio calculations of bismuth properties, including spin–orbit coupling. Physica Scripta 37, 785 (1988)

    1988

  36. [45]

    N. R. Werthamer, E. Helfand, P. C. Hohenberg, Temperature and Purity Dependence of the Superconducting Critical Field, ${H}_{c2}$. III. Electron Spin and Spin -Orbit Effects. Physical Review 147, 295-302 (1966)

    1966

  37. [46]

    E. F. Talantsev, Universal Fermi velocity in highly compressed hydride superconductors. Matter and Radiation at Extremes 7, (2022)

    2022

  38. [47]

    Ganose, A

    A. Ganose, A. Searle, A. Jain, S. Griffin, IFermi: A python library for Fermi surface generation and analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 6, (2021)

    2021

  39. [48]

    A. Togo, I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scr. Mater. 108, 1-5 (2015)

    2015

  40. [49]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. d. Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. 16 Marzari, F. ...

    2009

  41. [50]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. d. Gironcoli, A. D. Corso, P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density -functional perturbation theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 -562 (2001)

    2001

  42. [51]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple [Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)]. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997)

    1996

  43. [52]

    Kresse, D

    G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758-1775 (1999)

    1999

  44. [53]

    Kawamura, Y

    M. Kawamura, Y . Gohda, S. Tsuneyuki, Improved tetrahedron method for the Brillouin- zone integration applicable to response functions. Phys. Rev. B 89, 094515 (2014)

    2014

  45. [54]

    P. B. Allen, R. C. Dynes, Transition temperature of strong -coupled superconductors reanalyzed. Phys. Rev. B 12, 905-922 (1975)

    1975

  46. [55]

    Fonari, S

    A. Fonari, S. Stauffer. (2013)

    2013

  47. [56]

    F. Du, F. F. Balakirev, V . S. Minkov, G. A. Smith, B. Maiorov, P. P . Kong, A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, Tunneling Spectroscopy at Megabar Pressures: Determination of the Superconducting Gap in Sulfur. Physical Review Letters 133, 036002 (2024)

    2024

  48. [57]

    WayneCrump, Nowa-Ammerlaan. (2023)

    2023

  49. [58]

    G. M. Shutov, D. V . Semenok, I. A. Kruglov, A. R. Oganov, Ternary superconducting hydrides in the La–Mg–H system. Materials Today Physics 40, 101300 (2024)

    2024

  50. [59]

    A. M. Ganose, A. Searle, A. Jain, S. M. Griffin, IFermi: A python library for Fermi surface generation and analysis. J. Open Source Softw. 6, 3089 (2021). Acknowledgements We would like to thank the staff of the BL10XU (Spring-8, Japan) beamline and, especially, Dr. Hirokazu K...

    2021

  51. [60]

    Experimental parameters of DACs…………..……….……………………………………………S2

  52. [61]

    Transport measurements…………..…………….…………………………………………………S3

  53. [62]

    Raman and XRD measurements…………….……………………………………………………..S5

  54. [63]

    Critical current measurements… …………………………………………………………………..S8

  55. [64]

    Theoretical calculations……………………………………………………………………………S9

  56. [65]

    References………………………………………………………………………………………..S16

  57. [66]

    Parameters of samples, high-pressure DACs, and diamond anvils used in this study

    Experimental parameters of DACs Table S1. Parameters of samples, high-pressure DACs, and diamond anvils used in this study. DAC B1 DAC B2 DAC B3 Starting material Bi/AB Bi/AB Bi/AB DAC’s material NiCrAl BeCu BeCu Insulating gasket W/BN/epoxy nonmagnetic steel/CaF2/epoxy nonmag...

  58. [67]

    Resistive transitions in bismuth hydrides under pressure

    Transport measurements Figure S1. Resistive transitions in bismuth hydrides under pressure. (a) Temperature d ependence of the voltage drop across the sample of BiHx in DAC B2 at 186 and 211 GPa (electrodes combination 1). (b) Temperature dependence of electrical resistance of...

  59. [68]

    Raman studies of BiHx sample in the DAC B2 at 211 and 186 GPa

    Raman and XRD measurements Figure S5. Raman studies of BiHx sample in the DAC B2 at 211 and 186 GPa. (a) General view of the Raman spectrum at 211 GPa. (b) Zoom in on the low -frequency region. (c) Zoom in on the high -frequency region. Peak at 3973 cm -1 should be attributed ...

  60. [69]

    This CCCS allowed us to source current into the sample up to 0.6 A and perform voltage sweeps up to 90 V , while preserving the Keithley 6221's setup speed and resolution

    Critical current measurements To enhance our ability to measure critical current beyond the capability of the Keithley 6221, we engineered our custom current booster or, in other words, a current -controlled current source (CCCS). This CCCS allowed us to source current into th...

  61. [70]

    Structures of various bismuth hydrides used in this work

    Theoretical calculations Table S2. Structures of various bismuth hydrides used in this work. Structure (pressure) Atomic coordinates (CIF format) Cmcm-BiH2 (155 GPa) Space Group: Cmcm (#63-1) a = 3.179 Å α = 90.0° b = 7.961 Å β = 90.0° c = 3.106 Å γ = 90.0° V = 78.6067 Å3 _sym...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.