Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 111 references

Phasebook: A Survey of Selected Open Problems in Phase Retrieval

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single variational objective with a generative prior interpolates between classical phase retrieval and generative-only reconstruction, and its reconstruction error is bounded by a linear trade-off between generative bias and…

desk verdict Useful workshop survey of phase retrieval open problems; the Section 5 technical claims fail as stated because A(f)=|Af|^2 is neither injective nor globally bi-Lipschitz. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15351 v1 pith:OCAF74AI submitted 2025-05-21 cs.IT math.ITmath.OC

Marc Allain , Selin Aslan , Wim Coene , Sjoerd Dirksen , Jonathan Dong , Julien Flamant , Mark Iwen , Felix Krahmer
show 8 more authors
Tristan van Leeuwen Oleh Melnyk Andreas Menzel Allard P. Mosk Viktor Nikitin Gerlind Plonka Palina Salanevich Matthias Wellershoff
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ITmath.ITmath.OC MSC 94A1242A3894A08
keywords phaseretrievalptychographyinverseproblemcomplexitygenerativepriorsrandommatricesquantizationWignerdistributiondeconvolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Phase retrieval is the task of recovering a signal from intensity-only measurements, and it is central to X-ray crystallography, electron microscopy, and ptychography. This survey argues that the main open problems of the field—measuring object difficulty, physics-informed parametrization, structured random measurements, one-bit quantization, and Wigner distribution deconvolution—are what keep theory from matching practice. Its technical centerpiece is a claim about generative priors: a single objective that fits both the phaseless measurements and a generative model interpolates between classical reconstruction and generative-only reconstruction, with reconstruction error bounded by a linear trade-off between model bias and noise amplification. If this bound holds in realistic settings, it gives practitioners a principled way to decide how much to trust a learned prior.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the unified variational objective $\min_{z,f} \|A(f)-y\|^2 + \lambda^2\|G(z)-f\|^2$, which makes $\lambda$ a continuous dial between pure data fidelity and pure generative reconstruction; under the bi-Lipschitz assumptions, Lemma 5.5 converts this objective into the linear error bound. A second load-bearing identity, used in the Wigner deconvolution section, is $I = W_f \ast K_w$: ptychographic intensities are a convolution of the object's Wigner distribution with the window's, so a Fourier-domain division separates object from window when the window's ambiguity function has no zeros.

What would settle it

Construct an out-of-distribution signal $f_0$ whose distance to the generative model's best approximation, $\|G(z_0)-f_0\|$, is known; choose a measurement map whose Lipschitz constant $\alpha$ can be numerically estimated; solve the unified objective over a grid of $\lambda$; and check whether $\|f-f_0\|$ stays below $\lambda\alpha\|G(z_0)-f_0\| + 2\alpha\|\varepsilon\|$ at every $\lambda$. An observed error above the predicted line at any $\lambda$ would refute the paper's Lemma 5.5.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, classical phase retrieval and generative-model-based reconstruction are two endpoints of one optimization problem. Given a measurement map $A$, a generative model $G$, and noisy phaseless data $y$, the estimator obtained from minimizing $\|A(f)-y\|^2 + \lambda^2\|G(z)-f\|^2$ interpolates between the classical estimator at $\lambda=0$ and the generative-only estimator as $\lambda\to\infty$. Under the assumption that $A$ and $G$ are injective and bi-Lipschitz, Lemma 5.5 bounds the reconstruction error by $\lambda\alpha\|G(z_0)-f_0\| + 2\alpha\|\varepsilon\|$, a linear trade-off between the bias introduced by the generative model and the amplification of measurement noise. The survey also contends that the open problems it lists are the essential bottlenecks separating such guarantees from practical imaging.

Load-bearing premise

The bound assumes the measurement process and the generative model both stretch distances by known, bounded factors; for real learned networks and realistic phase retrieval measurements these factors are essentially unverifiable, and the paper itself notes that explicit constants are unknown for most systems.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The unified objective reduces to classical phase retrieval at $\lambda=0$ and to generative-only reconstruction as $\lambda\to\infty$, and in the paper's masked-Fourier experiments it gives the lowest relative error for both in-distribution and out-of-distribution signals.
  • A Fourier-domain correlation procedure can single out sparse imperfections that a generative model cannot express, demonstrated on a letter with a diacritic mark, without an explicit model of the defect.
  • For Gaussian random measurement matrices, weak recovery begins at oversampling ratio 1 and full recovery at 2, with an algorithmic full-recovery threshold near 2.03 for approximate message passing; structured two-layer lens–diffuser systems show a phase transition near 2.
  • In the low-dose regime, Poisson phase retrieval can be reinterpreted as one-bit quantization with bit-flip noise, and a hybrid method achieves weak recovery with four measurements per unknown for Gaussian sensing, the starting point for event-driven scanning transmission electron microscopy.
  • Wigner distribution deconvolution recovers an object from ptychographic intensities in $O(n\delta\log n)$ operations when all scan positions are used and the window's ambiguity function has no zeros; symmetric windows introduce zeros and require a subspace completion step whose guarantees are incomplete.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The linear form of the bound suggests a calibration rule the paper leaves implicit: choose λ proportional to the Lipschitz constant times the ratio of noise to model bias, so the two error terms balance; this could be tested from residuals alone.
  • If the bi-Lipschitz assumption can be relaxed to local versions, the same interpolation objective should apply to other nonlinear inverse problems with learned priors, such as deblurring and limited-angle tomography.
  • The subspace completion approach for missing Wigner-deconvolution coefficients could extend to arbitrary missing patterns by viewing the diagonals of $ff^*$ as a low-rank matrix completion problem; the paper analyzes only the one-missing-coefficient case.
  • The weak-versus-full recovery distinction offers a detector-design criterion: for low-dose event-driven STEM, the oversampling ratio should be compared with the algorithmic full-recovery threshold rather than the information-theoretic one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This survey, produced from the PRiMA 2024 Lorentz Center workshop, identifies and contextualizes six families of open problems in phase retrieval: intrinsic difficulty/complexity measures, physics-informed object and probe parameterization, generative-model regularization ('PtyGenography'), structured random measurements, one-bit quantized event-driven 4D STEM, and mathematical foundations of Wigner distribution deconvolution. Each section formulates questions and cites relevant literature. The paper also contains a self-contained technical core in Section 5: under an injectivity/bi-Lipschitz assumption on the measurement map and generative model, it states error bounds for the classical formulation (11), the generative formulation (12), and the unified objective (13), and reports a small MNIST-based numerical experiment supporting the unified approach.

Significance. The survey's breadth is its main value: it collects hard open questions from a diverse community, connects theory to concrete imaging applications, and provides an extensive reference list. Sections 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 are appropriately hedged and useful as a field map. The Section 5 material, however, cannot currently serve as the advertised technical centerpiece: its assumptions are not satisfied by the phase retrieval map, and the numerical support is not reproducible. As a survey, the paper can be repaired by restricting the theorems to a setting where the assumptions hold or are explicitly conjectured, and by reporting numerical results with proper uncertainty quantification and code/data availability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5.1 (first paragraph; Lemmas 5.2 and 5.5)] The blanket assumption that A and G are injective and bi-Lipschitz on all of C^n is false for the phase-retrieval map A(f)=|Af|^2. The map is not injective (A(e^{iθ}f)=A(f)), and it is not bi-Lipschitz: for g≠0 and t>1, ||A(tg)-A(g)||_2 / ||tg-g||_2 = (t+1) || |Ag|^2 ||_2 / ||g||_2, which is unbounded, while for t→0 the ratio tends to 0. Consequently, in the noiseless case ε=0, Lemma 5.2 would imply ||tilde f - f0||≤0, contradicting the global-phase twin e^{iθ}f0. The lemmas must be restated in a quotient metric (identifying global phase) and on a bounded domain, or explicitly restricted to a class of bounded outputs; otherwise the interpolation claim (13) is not a theorem about phase retrieval. Problem 5.6 acknowledges the absence of a global bi-Lipschitz property as an open question, but this does not repair the stated lemmas, since the assumption is not merely unverified: it is false.
  2. [Section 5.2 (Figure 6 and surrounding text)] The numerical demonstration is a single small-scale experiment: n=64, k=30, ℓ=100 Bernoulli masks, one MNIST-derived PCA model, and no error bars, confidence intervals, or code. The text states that 'the combined method (13) achieves the best result for both low and high signal-to-noise ratio levels,' but the plotted differences may be within run-to-run variability. Please provide standard deviations or confidence intervals, release the code and data, or explicitly soften the claim to an illustrative observation. This is important because the methods involve random masks and random noise realizations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract/keywords] The keyword 'deconvilution' is a typo for 'deconvolution'.
  2. [Section 8.2] The phrase 'bandlimited [?,93]' contains an unresolved citation placeholder; the missing reference should be supplied.
  3. [References [34] and [35]] References [34] and [35] appear to be duplicate entries for the same tutorial by Dong et al.; they should be consolidated.
  4. [Section 5.1.3] The heading 'Vanderlugt correlation' is inconsistently capitalized; the text elsewhere uses 'VanderLugt'.
  5. [Section 6.2] In the first bullet, 'For the measurement setup when A= F DF, we observe...' should read 'when A=FDF,'; the sentence also does not indicate whether the reported phase transition is empirical or proven.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Section 5's error bounds are borrowed from the authors' companion paper [11], and the main defect is assumption failure for phase retrieval, not circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper is a survey and open-problems report. Most sections summarize external literature with citations to prior work ([12], [28], [38], [57], [82], [89], [96], etc.), and the survey's own contributions are framed as open questions rather than as derived predictions. Section 5's technical lemmas (Lemmas 5.2, 5.3, 5.5) are presented as summaries of the authors' companion paper: the text says 'This section provides an overview of the recent work by the authors [11]' and 'In [11], we show the following reconstruction guarantees for (13).' This is a substantive self-citation, but it is not a circular reduction: the assumptions stated in the survey (injectivity and bi-Lipschitzness of A and G, well-conditionedness of G) do not include the asserted error bounds, so the lemmas are not assumed into existence by the present text. The companion paper is cited as the source of the derivation, and the reader can check that derivation there. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction: the regularization parameters in Section 5.2 are chosen from the known noise level, and the numerical comparison is disclosed as an experiment rather than as a theorem. The most serious issue is a correctness/domain-of-validity problem, not circularity: the Section 5 assumptions do not hold for the phase-retrieval map A(f)=|Af|^2, which is never injective because of global phase symmetry and is not globally bi-Lipschitz because of quadratic scaling. That failure undermines the claimed applicability of Lemmas 5.2 and 5.5 to phase retrieval as formulated, but it does not make the derivation circular. The score of 2 reflects the minor self-citation caveat and the unverifiability of Section 5 within the survey itself, not the presence of a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger reflects the fact that this is a survey: the central open problems carry no fitted parameters of their own. The only free parameters appear in the illustrative Section 5 experiment (lambda, k, ell) and are chosen by hand. The axiomatic load sits on the bi-Lipschitz and well-conditioning assumptions for A and G, which are standard for this line of analysis but unverified for real imaging operators and learned priors.

free parameters (3)
  • Regularization weight lambda for (13) = 10*sigma^2 (and sigma^2 for (11))
    Set by hand in Section 5.2; no selection rule is given, and the reported performance depends on this choice.
  • PCA latent dimension k = 30
    Chosen for the n=64 MNIST experiment; controls the expressiveness of the generative model G.
  • Number of random binary masks ell = 100
    Gives m = n*ell measurements; affects the oversampling and the observed error curves in Figure 6.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The measurement map A is injective and bi-Lipschitz with known constant alpha (Section 5.1).
    Used for Lemmas 5.2, 5.3, and 5.5. Remark 5.1 concedes that explicit alpha is unknown for most realistic matrices, making the bound hard to instantiate.
  • domain assumption The generative model G is injective and bi-Lipschitz with beta close to 1 (Section 5.1).
    The error bounds depend on beta and on the combined constant gamma; learned models are not guaranteed to satisfy this, so the bounds are conditional.
  • domain assumption For Fourier phase retrieval, the sampled autocorrelation gamma coincides with the spatial sampling of the continuous autocorrelation (Section 3.1).
    Underlies the proposed complexity measures Omega and B; noise and beamstops can break this equality.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phasebook: A Survey of Selected Open Problems in Phase Retrieval." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OCAF74AI

@misc{pith2026250515351,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phasebook: A Survey of Selected Open Problems in Phase Retrieval},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OCAF74AI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15351}
}
read the original abstract

Phase retrieval is an inverse problem that, on one hand, is crucial in many applications across imaging and physics, and, on the other hand, leads to deep research questions in theoretical signal processing and applied harmonic analysis. This survey paper is an outcome of the recent workshop Phase Retrieval in Mathematics and Applications (PRiMA) (held on August 5--9 2024 at the Lorentz Center in Leiden, The Netherlands) that brought together experts working on theoretical and practical aspects of the phase retrieval problem with the purpose to formulate and explore essential open problems in the field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15351 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of objects. and can be used for other experimental unknowns. For instance, in electron microscopy, the probe is typically represented by aberrations of circular aperture in terms of Zernike polynomial expansion [81, 91]. Note that the idea of efficient parametrization is not new to imaging and phase retrieval. Ideas from compressed sensing [16,62,65,105], dictionary learn￾ing [71, 103], and, generative lear… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Example of an object f0 “ f ` η, where f is the letter ’a’ and the imperfection η is the dot accent. (b) Imperfection η retrieved from correlating the generative reconstruction f with the given phaseless measurements. 5.1.4 Towards a unified approach We propose a combined approach to inference using a generative model min z,f }Apfq ´ y} 2 2 ` λ 2 }Gpzq ´ f } 2 2 . (13) Obviously, as λ “ 0, we retrieve (11), and … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Samples of the data set on which the generative model was trained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Samples generated by the generative model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of the binary masks used to generate the measurements. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relative reconstruction error for the three methods for varying signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Left) Correlation |x˜f,f0y| (higher is better) achieved by the AMP algorithm in noiseless random phase retrieval as a function of the oversam￾pling ratio α. We compare it to the asymptotic theoretical prediction, known as “state evolution” (blue curve) and to the info…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Top) Performance of structured random models with several archi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Phase Retrieval for Finitely-Supported Complex Measures via the Fourier Transform

    Ahmed Abouserie et al. Phase Retrieval for Finitely-Supported Complex Measures via the Fourier Transform . PhD thesis, University of Houston, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Investigation of composite materials using slm-based phase retrieval

    Mostafa Agour, Claas Falldorf, and Ralf B Bergmann. Investigation of composite materials using slm-based phase retrieval. Optics Letters , 38(13):2203–2205, 2013

    2013

  3. [3]

    On the connection between uniqueness from samples and stability in Gabor phase retrieval

    Rima Alaifari, Francesca Bartolucci, Stefan Steinerberger, and Matthias Wellershoff. On the connection between uniqueness from samples and stability in Gabor phase retrieval. Sampling Theory, Signal Process- ing, and Data Analysis , 22(6), 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s43670-023-00079-1

    2024

  4. [4]

    Stable Phase Retrieval in Infinite Dimensions

    Rima Alaifari, Ingrid Daubechies, Philipp Grohs, and Rujie Yin. Stable Phase Retrieval in Infinite Dimensions. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 19(4):869–900, 2019

    2019

  5. [5]

    Phase retrieval in the general setting of continuous frames for banach spaces

    Rima Alaifari and Philipp Grohs. Phase retrieval in the general setting of continuous frames for banach spaces. SIAM journal on mathematical analysis, 49(3):1895–1911, 2017

    1911

  6. [6]

    Stability Estimates for Phase Retrieval from Discrete Gabor Measurements

    Rima Alaifari and Matthias Wellershoff. Stability Estimates for Phase Retrieval from Discrete Gabor Measurements. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, 27(2), 2021

    2021

  7. [7]

    Phase retrieval from sampled Gabor transform magnitudes: Counterexamples

    Rima Alaifari and Matthias Wellershoff. Phase retrieval from sampled Gabor transform magnitudes: Counterexamples. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications , 28(9), 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00041-021-09901-7

    2022

  8. [8]

    Patchnr: learning from very few images by patch normalizing flow regularization

    Fabian Altekr¨ uger, Alexander Denker, Paul Hagemann, Johannes Her- trich, Peter Maass, and Gabriele Steidl. Patchnr: learning from very few images by patch normalizing flow regularization. Inverse Problems , 39(6):064006, 2023

    2023

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification

    Anastasios N Angelopoulos and Stephen Bates. A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.07511 , 2021. 35

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Joint ptycho-tomography with deep generative priors

    Selin Aslan, Zhengchun Liu, Viktor Nikitin, Tekin Bicer, Sven Leyffer, and Do˘ ga G¨ ursoy. Joint ptycho-tomography with deep generative priors. Machine Learning: Science and Technology , 2(4):045017, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Ptygenography: using generative models for regularization of the phase retrieval problem

    Selin Aslan, Tristan van Leeuwen, Allard Mosk, and Palina Salanevich. Ptygenography: using generative models for regularization of the phase retrieval problem. arXiv:2502.01338, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    On lipschitz analysis and lipschitz syn- thesis for the phase retrieval problem

    Radu Balan and Dongmian Zou. On lipschitz analysis and lipschitz syn- thesis for the phase retrieval problem. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 496:152–181, 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    Bandeira, Jameson Cahill, Dustin G

    Afonso S. Bandeira, Jameson Cahill, Dustin G. Mixon, and Aaron A. Nelson. Saving phase: Injectivity and stability for phase retrieval. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , 37(1):106–125, 2014

    2014

  6. [14]

    Barnett, Charles L

    Alexander H. Barnett, Charles L. Epstein, Leslie Greengard, and Jeremy Magland. Geometry of the Phase Retrieval Problem: Graveyard of Algo- rithms. Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathe- matics. Cambridge University Press, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Injectivity conditions for stft phase retrieval on z, z d and r d

    David Bartusel. Injectivity conditions for stft phase retrieval on z, z d and r d. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications , 29(4):53, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Sparse phase retrieval of one- dimensional signals by prony’s method

    Robert Beinert and Gerlind Plonka. Sparse phase retrieval of one- dimensional signals by prony’s method. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics , 3, 2017

    2017

  9. [17]

    Prony-based super-resolution phase retrieval of sparse, multivariate signals

    Robert Beinert and Saghar Rezaei. Prony-based super-resolution phase retrieval of sparse, multivariate signals. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07696 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Tamir Bendory, Dan Edidin, and Yonina C. Eldar. Blind Phaseless Short- Time Fourier Transform Recovery. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 66(5):3232–3241, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Eldar, and Nicolas Boumal

    Tamir Bendory, Yonina C. Eldar, and Nicolas Boumal. Non-Convex Phase Retrieval From STFT Measurements. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 64(1):467–484, 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    Phase Retrieval from Gabor Mea- surements

    Irena Bojarovska and Axel Flinth. Phase Retrieval from Gabor Mea- surements. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications , 22(3):542–567, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    The global land- scape of phase retrieval i: perturbed amplitude models

    Jian-Feng Cai, Meng Huang, Dong Li, and Yang Wang. The global land- scape of phase retrieval i: perturbed amplitude models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07993, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Phase re- trieval from coded diffraction patterns

    Emmanuel J Candes, Xiaodong Li, and Mahdi Soltanolkotabi. Phase re- trieval from coded diffraction patterns. Applied and Computational Har- monic Analysis, 39(2):277–299, 2015. 36

    2015

  15. [23]

    Total variation–based phase retrieval for poisson noise removal

    Huibin Chang, Yifei Lou, Yuping Duan, and Stefano Marchesini. Total variation–based phase retrieval for poisson noise removal. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences , 11(1):24–55, 2018

    2018

  16. [24]

    Henry N. Chapman. Phase-retrieval X-ray microscopy by Wigner- distribution deconvolution. Ultramicroscopy, 66(3-4):153–172, 1996

    1996

  17. [25]

    Solving random quadratic systems of equations is nearly as easy as solving linear systems

    Yuxin Chen and Emmanuel Candes. Solving random quadratic systems of equations is nearly as easy as solving linear systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28, 2015

    2015

  18. [26]

    Holtz, Michal Odstrˇ cil, Manuel Guizar-Sicairos, Isabelle Hanke, Steffen Ganschow, Darrell G

    Zhen Chen, Yi Jiang, Yu-Tsun Shao, Megan E. Holtz, Michal Odstrˇ cil, Manuel Guizar-Sicairos, Isabelle Hanke, Steffen Ganschow, Darrell G. Schlom, and David A. Muller. Electron ptychography achieves atomic- resolution limits set by lattice vibrations. Science, 372(6544):826–831, 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    Stable phase retrieval from locally stable and conditionally connected measure- ments

    Cheng Cheng, Ingrid Daubechies, Nadav Dym, and Jianfeng Lu. Stable phase retrieval from locally stable and conditionally connected measure- ments. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , 55:440–465, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Generalized Phase-Space Distribution Functions

    Leon Cohen. Generalized Phase-Space Distribution Functions. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 7(5):781–786, 05 1966

    1966

  21. [29]

    Time-frequency analysis, volume 778

    Leon Cohen. Time-frequency analysis, volume 778. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR, 1995

    1995

  22. [30]

    Fast 2D Phase Retrieval using Bandlimited Masks

    Cyril Cordor, Brendan Williams, Yulia Hristova, and Aditya Viswanathan. Fast 2D Phase Retrieval using Bandlimited Masks. In An- tonio Marques and Borbala Hunyadi, editors, 28th European Signal Pro- cessing Conference (EUSIPCO 2020) , pages 980–984, [Piscataway, NJ],

    2020

  23. [31]

    The mnist database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research

    Li Deng. The mnist database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6):141–142, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Wirtinger gradient descent methods for low-dose poisson phase retrieval

    Benedikt Diederichs, Frank Filbir, and Patricia R¨ omer. Wirtinger gradient descent methods for low-dose poisson phase retrieval. Inverse Problems, 40(12):125030, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Exact inversion of partially coherent dynamical electron scattering for picometric structure retrieval

    Benedikt Diederichs, Ziria Herdegen, Achim Strauch, Frank Filbir, and Knut M¨ uller-Caspary. Exact inversion of partially coherent dynamical electron scattering for picometric structure retrieval. Nature Communica- tions, 15(1):101, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Phase retrieval: From computational imaging to machine learning: A tutorial

    Jonathan Dong, Lorenzo Valzania, Antoine Maillard, Thanh An Pham, Sylvain Gigan, and Michael Unser. Phase retrieval: From computational imaging to machine learning: A tutorial. IEEE Signal Processing Maga- zine, 40:45–57, 2023. 37

    2023

  27. [35]

    Phase retrieval: From computational imaging to machine learning: A tutorial

    Jonathan Dong, Lorenzo Valzania, Antoine Maillard, Thanh-an Pham, Sylvain Gigan, and Michael Unser. Phase retrieval: From computational imaging to machine learning: A tutorial. IEEE Signal Processing Maga- zine, 40(1):45–57, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Veit Elser and R. P. Millane. Reconstruction of an object from its symmetry-averaged diffraction pattern. Acta Crystallographica Section A, 64(2):273–279, 2008

    2008

  29. [37]

    Blind ptychography: uniqueness and ambiguities

    Albert Fannjiang and Pengwen Chen. Blind ptychography: uniqueness and ambiguities. Inverse Problems, 36(4):045005, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Phase retrieval from very few measurements

    Matthew Fickus, Dustin G Mixon, Aaron A Nelson, and Yang Wang. Phase retrieval from very few measurements. Linear Algebra and its Ap- plications, 449:475–499, 2014

    2014

  31. [39]

    J. R. Fienup. Reconstruction of a complex-valued object from the modulus of its fourier transform using a support constraint. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A , 4(1):118–123, 1987

    1987

  32. [40]

    Well- conditioned ptychographic imaging via lost subspace completion

    Anton Forstner, Felix Krahmer, Oleh Melnyk, and Nada Sissouno. Well- conditioned ptychographic imaging via lost subspace completion. Inverse Problems, 36(10):105009, 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    Phase retrieval from the magnitudes of affine linear measurements

    Bing Gao, Qiyu Sun, Yang Wang, and Zhiqiang Xu. Phase retrieval from the magnitudes of affine linear measurements. Advances in Applied Math- ematics, 93:121–141, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    Limitations to significant information in biological elec- tron microscopy as a result of radiation damage

    Robert M Glaeser. Limitations to significant information in biological elec- tron microscopy as a result of radiation damage. Journal of Ultrastructure Research, 36(3-4):466–482, 1971

    1971

  35. [43]

    Joseph W. Goodman. Introduction to Fourier Optics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988

    1988

  36. [44]

    Statistical optics

    Joseph W Goodman. Statistical optics. John Wiley & Sons, 2015

    2015

  37. [45]

    Phase re- trieval: Uniqueness and stability

    Philipp Grohs, Sarah Koppensteiner, and Martin Rathmair. Phase re- trieval: Uniqueness and stability. SIAM Review, 62:301–350, 2020

    2020

  38. [46]

    On foundational discretization barriers in STFT phase retrieval

    Philipp Grohs and Lukas Liehr. On foundational discretization barriers in STFT phase retrieval. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications , 28(39), 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00041-022-09935-5

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    Injectivity of gabor phase retrieval from lattice measurements

    Philipp Grohs and Lukas Liehr. Injectivity of gabor phase retrieval from lattice measurements. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , 62:173–193, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Phaseless sampling on square-root lat- tices

    Philipp Grohs and Lukas Liehr. Phaseless sampling on square-root lat- tices. Foundations of Computational Mathematics , pages 1–24, 2024. 38

    2024

  41. [49]

    Stable gabor phase retrieval in gaussian shift-invariant spaces via biorthogonality

    Philipp Grohs and Lukas Liehr. Stable gabor phase retrieval in gaussian shift-invariant spaces via biorthogonality. Constructive Approximation , 59(1):61–111, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Multi-window stft phase retrieval: lattice uniqueness

    Philipp Grohs, Lukas Liehr, and Martin Rathmair. Multi-window stft phase retrieval: lattice uniqueness. Journal of Functional Analysis , 288(3):110733, 2025

    2025

  43. [51]

    Phase retrieval in fock space and perturbation of liouville sets

    Philipp Grohs, Lukas Liehr, and Martin Rathmair. Phase retrieval in fock space and perturbation of liouville sets. Revista Matem´ atica Iberoameri- cana, 41(3):969–1008, 2025

    2025

  44. [52]

    From completeness of discrete translates to phaseless sampling of the short-time Fourier trans- form

    Philipp Grohs, Lukas Liehr, and Irina Shafkulovska. From completeness of discrete translates to phaseless sampling of the short-time Fourier trans- form. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.05687, 2022

    2022 doi arXiv

  45. [53]

    Stable Gabor Phase Retrieval and Spectral Clustering

    Philipp Grohs and Martin Rathmair. Stable Gabor Phase Retrieval and Spectral Clustering. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 72(5):981–1043, 2019

    2019

  46. [54]

    l2-stability analysis for gabor phase retrieval

    Philipp Grohs and Martin Rathmair. l2-stability analysis for gabor phase retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.06154 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Stable Gabor phase retrieval for multivariate functions

    Philipp Grohs and Martin Rathmair. Stable Gabor phase retrieval for multivariate functions. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , 24(5):1593–1615, 2022

    2022

  48. [56]

    Improved recovery guarantees for phase retrieval from coded diffraction patterns

    David Gross, Felix Krahmer, and Richard Kueng. Improved recovery guarantees for phase retrieval from coded diffraction patterns. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , 42(1):37–64, 2017

    2017

  49. [57]

    Quantum tomog- raphy under prior information

    Teiko Heinosaari, Luca Mazzarella, and Michael M Wolf. Quantum tomog- raphy under prior information. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 318(2):355–374, 2013

    2013

  50. [58]

    Struc- tured random model for fast and robust phase retrieval

    Zhiyuan Hu, Juli´ an Tachella, Michael Unser, and Jonathan Dong. Struc- tured random model for fast and robust phase retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05734, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    No existence of a linear algorithm for the one-dimensional fourier phase retrieval

    Meng Huang and Zhiqiang Xu. No existence of a linear algorithm for the one-dimensional fourier phase retrieval. Journal of Complexity, 86:101886, 2025

    2025

  52. [60]

    Robin- son, and Yong S

    Xiaojing Huang, Hanfei Yan, Ross Harder, Yeukuang Hwu, Ian K. Robin- son, and Yong S. Chu. Optimization of overlap uniformness for ptychog- raphy. Optics express, 22(10):12634–12644, 2014

    2014

  53. [61]

    Phase retrieval for l2pr´π, πsq via the provably accurate and noise robust numerical inversion of spectrogram measurements

    Mark Iwen, Michael Perlmutter, Nada Sissouno, and Aditya Viswanathan. Phase retrieval for l2pr´π, πsq via the provably accurate and noise robust numerical inversion of spectrogram measurements. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications , 29(8), 2023. 39

    2023

  54. [62]

    Robust sparse phase retrieval made easy

    Mark Iwen, Aditya Viswanathan, and Yang Wang. Robust sparse phase retrieval made easy. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , 42(1):135–142, 2017

    2017

  55. [63]

    Lower lipschitz bounds for phase retrieval from locally supported measurements

    Mark A Iwen, Sami Merhi, and Michael Perlmutter. Lower lipschitz bounds for phase retrieval from locally supported measurements. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , 47(2):526–538, 2019

    2019

  56. [64]

    Iwen, Aditya Viswanathan, and Yang Wang

    Mark A. Iwen, Aditya Viswanathan, and Yang Wang. Fast Phase Re- trieval from Local Correlation Measurements. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 9(4):1655–1688, 2016

    2016

  57. [65]

    Sparse phase retrieval: Convex algorithms and limitations

    Kishore Jaganathan, Samet Oymak, and Babak Hassibi. Sparse phase retrieval: Convex algorithms and limitations. In 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory , pages 1022–1026, 2013

    2013

  58. [66]

    Event driven 4d stem acquisition with a timepix3 detector: Microsecond dwell time and faster scans for high precision and low dose applications

    Daen Jannis, Christoph Hofer, Chuang Gao, Xiaobin Xie, Armand B´ ech´ e, Timothy J Pennycook, and Jo Verbeeck. Event driven 4d stem acquisition with a timepix3 detector: Microsecond dwell time and faster scans for high precision and low dose applications. Ultramicroscopy, 233:...

    2022

  59. [67]

    Stable low-rank matrix recovery via null space properties

    Maryia Kabanava, Richard Kueng, Holger Rauhut, and Ulrich Terstiege. Stable low-rank matrix recovery via null space properties. Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA , 5(4):405–441, 2016

    2016

  60. [68]

    Development of hybrid optical sensor based on deep learning to detect and classify the micro-size defects in printed circuit board

    Gulhan Ustabas Kaya. Development of hybrid optical sensor based on deep learning to detect and classify the micro-size defects in printed circuit board. Measurement, 206:112247, 2023

    2023

  61. [69]

    Three-dimensional imaging of phase ordering in an fe-al alloy by bragg ptychography

    Chan Kim, Virginie Chamard, J¨ org Hallmann, Thomas Roth, Wei Lu, Ulrike Boesenberg, Alexey Zozulya, Steven Leake, and Anders Madsen. Three-dimensional imaging of phase ordering in an fe-al alloy by bragg ptychography. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 121:256101, 2018

    2018

  62. [70]

    A one-bit quantization approach for low-dose poisson phase retrieval

    Felix Krahmer and Patricia R¨ omer. A one-bit quantization approach for low-dose poisson phase retrieval. In 6th International Workshop on the Theory of Computational Sensing and its applications to Radar, Multi- modal Sensing, and Imaging (CoSeRa) . IEEE, 2024

    2024

  63. [71]

    Krishnan, Jos´ e M

    Joshin P. Krishnan, Jos´ e M. Bioucas-Dias, and Vladimir Katkovnik. Dic- tionary learning phase retrieval from noisy diffraction patterns. Sensors, 18(11), 2018

    2018

  64. [72]

    Bosch, and Sorin Lazar

    Ivan Lazi´ c, Eric G.T. Bosch, and Sorin Lazar. Phase contrast stem for thin samples: Integrated differential phase contrast. Ultramicroscopy, 160:265– 280, 2016

    2016

  65. [73]

    Denoised wigner distribution de- convolution via low-rank matrix completion

    Justin Lee and George Barbastathis. Denoised wigner distribution de- convolution via low-rank matrix completion. Opt. Express, 24(18):20069– 20079, 2016. 40

    2016

  66. [74]

    Characterization of surface defects using a phase retrieval technique in a high-power laser system

    Lucien Lehmann, St´ ephane Bouillet, Christophe Leymarie, Christel Ameil-Schuh, Melusine Benoit, and Claude Rouyer. Characterization of surface defects using a phase retrieval technique in a high-power laser system. Applied Optics, 61(6):1545–1551, 2022

    2022

  67. [75]

    Phase Retrieval From Multiple-Window Short-Time Fourier Measure- ments

    Lan Li, Cheng Cheng, Deguang Han, Qiyu Sun, and Guangming Shi. Phase Retrieval From Multiple-Window Short-Time Fourier Measure- ments. IEEE Signal Processing Letters , 24(4):372–376, 2017

    2017

  68. [76]

    Identifiability and stability in blind deconvolution under minimal assumptions

    Yanjun Li, Kiryung Lee, and Yoram Bresler. Identifiability and stability in blind deconvolution under minimal assumptions. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , 63(7):4619–4633, 2017

    2017

  69. [77]

    Poisson phase retrieval in very low-count regimes

    Zongyu Li, Kenneth Lange, and Jeffrey A Fessler. Poisson phase retrieval in very low-count regimes. IEEE Transactions on computational imaging , 8:838–850, 2022

    2022

  70. [78]

    On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization

    Dong C Liu and Jorge Nocedal. On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization. Mathematical programming, 45(1):503–528, 1989

    1989

  71. [79]

    Lobato and D

    I. Lobato and D. Van Dyck. An accurate parameterization for scat- tering factors, electron densities and electrostatic potentials for neutral atoms that obey all physical constraints. Acta Crystallographica Section A, 70(6):636–649, 2014

    2014

  72. [80]

    A.V. Lugt. Signal detection by complex spatial filtering. IEEE Transac- tions on Information Theory , 10:139–145, 4 1964

    1964

  73. [81]

    Virendra N. Mahajan. Zernike circle polynomials and optical aberrations of systems with circular pupils. Appl. Opt. , 33(34):8121–8124, 1994

    1994

  74. [82]

    Phase retrieval in high dimensions: Statistical and computational phase transitions

    Antoine Maillard, Bruno Loureiro, Florent Krzakala, and Lenka Zde- borov´ a. Phase retrieval in high dimensions: Statistical and computational phase transitions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33, 2020

    2020

  75. [83]

    Randomized numerical linear algebra: Foundations and algorithms

    Per-Gunnar Martinsson and Joel A Tropp. Randomized numerical linear algebra: Foundations and algorithms. Acta Numerica, 29:403–572, 2020

    2020

  76. [84]

    Phase Retrieval from Short-Time Fourier Measurements and Applications to Ptychography

    Oleh Melnyk. Phase Retrieval from Short-Time Fourier Measurements and Applications to Ptychography . PhD thesis, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 2023

    2023

  77. [85]

    Convergence properties of epie and stochastic gradient methods for blind ptychography

    Oleh Melnyk. Convergence properties of epie and stochastic gradient methods for blind ptychography. Analysis and Applications , accepted, 2025

    2025

  78. [86]

    Background removal for ptychogra- phy via wigner distribution deconvolution

    Oleh Melnyk and Patricia R¨ omer. Background removal for ptychogra- phy via wigner distribution deconvolution. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 17(3):1978–2014, 2024. 41

    1978

  79. [87]

    Direct observation of Cu in high-silica chabazite zeolite by electron pty- chography using Wigner distribution deconvolution

    Kazutaka Mitsuishi, Katsuaki Nakazawa, Ryusuke Sagawa, Masahiko Shimizu, Hajime Matsumoto, Hisashi Shima, and Takahiko Takewaki. Direct observation of Cu in high-silica chabazite zeolite by electron pty- chography using Wigner distribution deconvolution. Scientific Reports , 1...

    2023

  80. [88]

    Actinic imag- ing and evaluation of phase structures on extreme ultraviolet lithography masks

    Iacopo Mochi, Kenneth A Goldberg, and Sungmin Huh. Actinic imag- ing and evaluation of phase structures on extreme ultraviolet lithography masks. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, 28(6):C6E11–C6E16, 2010

    2010

  81. [89]

    Fundamental limits of weak re- covery with applications to phase retrieval

    Marco Mondelli and Andrea Montanari. Fundamental limits of weak re- covery with applications to phase retrieval. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 19(3), 2019

    2019

  82. [90]

    Support recovery for sparse mul- tidimensional phase retrieval

    Alexei Novikov and Stephen White. Support recovery for sparse mul- tidimensional phase retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , 69:4403–4415, 2021

    2021

  83. [91]

    Embedded pupil function recovery for fourier ptychographic microscopy

    Xiaoze Ou, Guoan Zheng, and Changhuei Yang. Embedded pupil function recovery for fourier ptychographic microscopy. Opt. Express, 22(5):4960– 4972, 2014

    2014

  84. [92]

    Low-dose cryo electron ptychography via non- convex bayesian optimization

    Philipp Michael Pelz, Wen Xuan Qiu, Robert B¨ ucker, G¨ unther Kassier, and RJ Dwayne Miller. Low-dose cryo electron ptychography via non- convex bayesian optimization. Scientific reports, 7(1):9883, 2017

    2017

  85. [93]

    Inverting spectrogram measurements via aliased Wigner distribution de- convolution and angular synchronization

    Michael Perlmutter, Sami Merhi, Aditya Viswanathan, and Mark Iwen. Inverting spectrogram measurements via aliased Wigner distribution de- convolution and angular synchronization. Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA , 2020

    2020

  86. [94]

    A provably accurate algorithm for recovering compactly supported smooth functions from spectrogram measurements

    Michael Perlmutter, Nada Sissouno, Aditya Viswantathan, and Mark Iwen. A provably accurate algorithm for recovering compactly supported smooth functions from spectrogram measurements. In 2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pages 970–974, 2021

    2020

  87. [95]

    M. S. Richman, T. W. Parks, and R. G. Shenoy. Discrete-time, discrete- frequency, time-frequency analysis. IEEE Transactions on Signal Process- ing, 46(6):1517–1527, 1998

    1998

  88. [96]

    J. M. Rodenburg and R.H.T. Bates. The theory of super-resolution electron microscopy via Wigner-distribution deconvolution. Philosophi- cal Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences, 339(1655):521–553, 1992

    1992

  89. [97]

    Sampling from large matrices: An approach through geometric functional analysis

    Mark Rudelson and Roman Vershynin. Sampling from large matrices: An approach through geometric functional analysis. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 54(4):21–es, 2007. 42

    2007

  90. [98]

    Jacob Seifert, Yifeng Shao, and Allard P. Mosk. Noise-robust latent vec- tor reconstruction in ptychography using deep generative models. Opt. Express, 32(1):1020–1033, 2024

    2024

  91. [99]

    Jacob Seifert, Yifeng Shao, and Allard P. Mosk. Noise-robust latent vec- tor reconstruction in ptychography using deep generative models. Optics Express, 32:1020, 1 2024

    2024

  92. [100]

    Compressed sensing-based robust phase retrieval via deep generative priors

    Fahad Shamshad and Ali Ahmed. Compressed sensing-based robust phase retrieval via deep generative priors. IEEE Sensors Journal , 21(2):2286– 2298, 2021

    2021

  93. [101]

    Wavelength-multiplexed multi-mode euv reflec- tion ptychography based on automatic differentiation

    Yifeng Shao, Sven Weerdenburg, Jacob Seifert, H Paul Urbach, Allard P Mosk, and Wim Coene. Wavelength-multiplexed multi-mode euv reflec- tion ptychography based on automatic differentiation. Light: Science & Applications, 13(1):196, 2024

    2024

  94. [102]

    Maximum-likelihood refinement for coherent diffractive imaging

    P Thibault and M Guizar-Sicairos. Maximum-likelihood refinement for coherent diffractive imaging. New Journal of Physics , 14(6):063004, 2012

    2012

  95. [103]

    Tillmann, Yonina C

    Andreas M. Tillmann, Yonina C. Eldar, and Julien Mairal. Dol- phin—dictionary learning for phase retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Sig- nal Processing, 64(24):6485–6500, 2016

    2016

  96. [104]

    Some tendencies in the tikhonov regularization of ill-posed problems

    VV Vasin. Some tendencies in the tikhonov regularization of ill-posed problems. Journal of Inverse & Ill-Posed Problems , 14(8), 2006

    2006

  97. [105]

    Giannakis, Mehmet Ak¸ cakaya, and Jie Chen

    Gang Wang, Liang Zhang, Georgios B. Giannakis, Mehmet Ak¸ cakaya, and Jie Chen. Sparse phase retrieval via truncated amplitude flow. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 66(2):479–491, 2018

    2018

  98. [106]

    An algorithm for bragg coherent x-ray diffractive imaging of highly strained nanocrystals

    Ziyi Wang, Oleg Gorobtsov, and Andrej Singer. An algorithm for bragg coherent x-ray diffractive imaging of highly strained nanocrystals. New Journal of Physics , 22(1):013021, 2020

    2020

  99. [107]

    Paul Urbach, and Wim M

    Xukang Wei, H. Paul Urbach, and Wim M. J. Coene. Cram´ er-rao lower bound and maximum-likelihood estimation in ptychography with poisson noise. Phys. Rev. A , 102:043516, 2020

    2020

  100. [108]

    Sampling at twice the Nyquist rate in two frequency bins guarantees uniqueness in Gabor phase retrieval

    Matthias Wellershoff. Sampling at twice the Nyquist rate in two frequency bins guarantees uniqueness in Gabor phase retrieval. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications , 29(7), 2023

    2023

  101. [109]

    Injectivity of sampled gabor phase retrieval in spaces with general integrability conditions

    Matthias Wellershoff. Injectivity of sampled gabor phase retrieval in spaces with general integrability conditions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 530(2):127692, 2024

    2024

  102. [110]

    Haldar, Walter Unglaub, Joshua Zusman, Anthony F

    Rui Xu, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi, Justin P. Haldar, Walter Unglaub, Joshua Zusman, Anthony F. J. Levi, and Richard M. Leahy. Accelerated Wirtinger Flow: A fast algorithm for ptychography. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05546, 2018. 43

    2018 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Martinez, Martin Simson, Martin Huth, Henning Ryll, Heike Soltau, Ryusuke Sagawa, Yuk- ihito Kondo, Colin Ophus, Peter Ercius, Lei Jin, Andr´ as Kov´ acs, and Pe- ter D

    Hao Yang, Ian MacLaren, Lewys Jones, Gerardo T. Martinez, Martin Simson, Martin Huth, Henning Ryll, Heike Soltau, Ryusuke Sagawa, Yuk- ihito Kondo, Colin Ophus, Peter Ercius, Lei Jin, Andr´ as Kov´ acs, and Pe- ter D. Nellist. Electron ptychographic phase imaging of light elem...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.