Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Analysis and Simulation of Generalized Langevin Equations with Non-Gaussian Orthogonal Forces

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For nonlinear coordinates, the statistics of the random force, not the potential of mean force, decide whether a coarse-grained GLE simulation gets the kinetics right.

desk verdict A clean systematic comparison of GLE formalisms with an honest but unresolved circularity problem in the NGF replay, so the central claim about Mori-GLE superiority is not yet established. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15665 v1 pith:RAKM6CL5 submitted 2025-05-21 physics.comp-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

Henrik Kiefer , Benjamin J. A. Héry , Lucas Tepper , Benjamin A. Dalton , Cihan Ayaz , Roland R. Netz This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.comp-phcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords generalizedLangevinequationnon-GaussiannoiseorthogonalforceMoriprojectioncoarse-grainedsimulationdihedralangledynamicsmeanfirst-passagetimeMarkovianembedding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks which generalized Langevin equation (GLE) formulation is most reliable for simulating nonlinear observables, and how to simulate a GLE when the random (orthogonal) force is not Gaussian. Using molecular dynamics trajectories of the butane dihedral angle, it shows that every GLE considered has a non-Gaussian orthogonal force, most strongly for the Mori-GLE, which relegates all nonlinearities into that force. It introduces a non-Gaussian force (NGF) simulation technique that replays orthogonal-force realizations taken from the MD trajectories. With this technique, the Mori-GLE, despite containing only a harmonic potential, reproduces mean first-passage times and other statistical observables better than GLEs that include the explicit potential of mean force but model the noise poorly. The paper concludes that accurately modeling the orthogonal-force statistics is more crucial than including the nonlinear potential of mean force.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the generalized Langevin equation itself, compared in three projection variants: the Mori-GLE (harmonic potential and linear friction, with every nonlinearity in the orthogonal force), the dual-projection GLE (explicit potential of mean force plus linear memory), and the constant-mass GLE. The new machinery is the non-Gaussian force (NGF) method: orthogonal-force realizations are computed from MD trajectories by rearranging the GLE (Eq. 16), then inserted as the driving term in a discretized GLE (Eq. B1) integrated with a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme, with no Gaussian assumption. The identity carrying the argument is the Mori-GLE fluctuation-dissipation relation between the orthogonal-force autocorrelation and the memory kernel (Eq. 5), which holds exactly for the Mori-GLE and lets the extracted force act as a faithful noise model.

What would settle it

Rerun the Mori-GLE NGF simulation for butane using orthogonal-force samples drawn only from the cis-state well while starting trajectories in the trans-state; if the trans-to-cis mean first-passage time stays as accurate as reported, position dependence of the noise is irrelevant, and if it degrades, the technique depends on matching noise realizations to the coordinate region, which is the assumption the central claim rests on.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a nonlinear reaction coordinate, a Mori-GLE driven by correctly sampled non-Gaussian orthogonal force is the most numerically accurate and robust coarse-grained simulation framework, and that replacing the orthogonal force by Gaussian noise is the main source of error. The authors demonstrate this by extracting memory kernels and orthogonal forces from butane MD data, showing that the Mori-GLE's orthogonal-force autocorrelation matches its memory kernel exactly while the dual-projection and constant-mass GLEs show residual kernels. Simulating all three GLEs with the NGF technique and comparing against Markovian embedding, they find that the Mori-GLE reproduces the position-dependent mass, mean-squared displacement, and mean first-passage time profiles across solvent viscosities, and only it faithfully captures the full passage-time distributions. Because that GLE has no explicit PMF, the result says: get the orthogonal-force statistics right first; a harmonic potential plus faithful noise beats an explicit nonlinear PMF with poorer noise.

Load-bearing premise

The NGF method assumes that an orthogonal-force segment cut from a molecular dynamics trajectory can be replayed as a stochastic driving force in a GLE simulation started from different initial conditions, even though the paper shows the force distribution depends on the current dihedral angle and on the past trajectory; if the replay is not a faithful noise model when decoupled from its original context, the measured advantage of the Mori-GLE could be an artifact of the replay method rather than a property of the GLE formalism.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NGF simulations of the Mori-GLE reproduce the MD mean first-passage times for butane trans-cis isomerization, including at higher solvent viscosities, while Markovian embedding with Gaussian noise does not.
  • The Mori-GLE reproduces the position-dependent mass and the full passage-time distribution even though its potential is harmonic, meaning the orthogonal force alone carries the nonlinear statistics.
  • The dual-projection and constant-mass GLEs, which include the potential of mean force, are less accurate in NGF simulations because of desynchronization between the nonlinear deterministic force and the sampled noise.
  • For other coarse-grained kinetic models, the noise distribution should be characterized before choosing an embedding scheme, since Gaussian embeddings can bias rare-event kinetics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the NGF replay method borrows orthogonal-force segments from MD trajectories and re-inserts them under different initial conditions; the paper shows the force distribution is position-dependent, so the method's accuracy may degrade when the sampled MD segment does not cover the coordinate regions the simulation must visit, making a generative sampler for non-Gaussian, non-Mark
  • Editorial inference: if non-Gaussian noise statistics matter more than the PMF for barrier-crossing kinetics, rate theories for activated processes in soft matter may need to take the exponential tails or higher-order cumulants of the noise as input, not just the friction memory.
  • Editorial inference: a practical transferable test for other systems is to run the Mori-GLE NGF simulation and compare transition-path and first-passage time distributions against MD; agreement would indicate the observable is well modeled without an explicit PMF, while disagreement would point to coordinate-dependent noise sampling that needs improvement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper compares three generalized Langevin equation (GLE) formalisms — Mori, dual-projection (DP), and constant-mass (CM) — for the dihedral-angle dynamics of butane in water. Using molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories, the authors extract memory kernels and orthogonal forces, report non-Gaussian and position-dependent statistics for all formalisms, and introduce a non-Gaussian force (NGF) simulation scheme in which orthogonal-force realizations computed from MD trajectories via Eq. (16) are inserted into discretized GLEs. Simulated mean first-passage times and equilibrium distributions are compared with MD data; the Mori-GLE is reported to be the most robust, and the authors conclude that modeling orthogonal-force statistics is more critical than including the non-linear PMF.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would make an important contribution to coarse-grained modeling by showing that the Mori-GLE, despite its linear deterministic force, can faithfully reproduce anharmonic kinetics provided the orthogonal force is handled correctly. The detailed comparison of memory kernels, position-dependent friction, and higher-order force correlations is valuable, and the NGF scheme is a useful consistency framework. However, because the orthogonal forces are replayed from the very MD trajectories used as benchmarks, the evidence does not currently support the claim of predictive superiority; the significance is therefore conditional on an independent generative test.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV / Appendix B / Fig. 2] The central comparison in Fig. 2 is confounded: the orthogonal-force realizations used in the NGF simulations are computed via Eq. (16) from the same MD trajectories whose statistical observables are then reproduced. This is a replay of the target dynamics rather than an independent stochastic model, so the reported agreement of the Mori-GLE does not constitute evidence that the Mori-GLE form is intrinsically more robust. An out-of-sample test, such as extracting forces from one portion of the MD data and evaluating the simulation on another portion, is needed.
  2. [Section IV / Supplementary Material Sec. S12] The paper shows that the orthogonal-force distributions are position-dependent, with the strongest dependence for the Mori-GLE. When forces from arbitrary MD segments are inserted with different initial conditions (Fig. 2), they are not conditioned on the simulated coordinate A_sim(t). For the Mori-GLE the resulting inconsistency is masked because Eq. (4) is linear in A, making A_sim a linear functional of the replayed force, which already contains all MD information; for the DP- and CM-GLEs the nonlinear PMF desynchronizes the replayed force, producing the dephasing documented in Sec. S11. The replay protocol therefore structurally favors the Mori-GLE.
  3. [Section V / Supplementary Material Sec. S13] The authors concede that an independent sampling method for non-Gaussian orthogonal forces is lacking. The model-system test in Sec. S13 uses a Gaussian noise process and thus does not validate the NGF scheme for the non-Gaussian case; it also does not resolve the circularity of using MD-derived forces. Consequently, the conclusion that 'modeling the orthogonal-force statistics is more crucial than including the non-linear PMF' is not supported by the presented evidence.
  4. [Section IV / Eq. (B1)] For the DP-GLE, the simulation uses the full memory kernel Γ_DP together with an orthogonal force whose autocorrelation is Γ_Q ≠ Γ_DP (Fig. 1e), so the fluctuation-dissipation relation is not satisfied for the simulated process. The poor performance of the DP-GLE in Fig. 2 is attributed to dephasing, but this is a consequence of the simulation protocol rather than an intrinsic property of the GLE formalism; this further weakens the comparison of formalisms.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the correct non-Gaussian orthogonal force 'distribution' is used, but the NGF method inserts empirical force realizations; this terminology overstates the generative content of the method.
  2. [Section IV] The statement that 'the hybrid and DP-GLE are equivalent' should be qualified: the equivalence holds only under the numerically verified but not exact condition Γ_DP^Q ≈ Γ_H^L (Sec. S1).
  3. [Fig. 2(d)] The figure caption reports that statistical errors are smaller than the linewidth, but the error estimation method is not described; please specify the block-size or bootstrap procedure used.
  4. [Eq. (16)] The orthogonal force for the Mori-GLE is denoted F^M_Q but the extraction formula is written for the DP-GLE; the analogous expressions for each GLE should be stated explicitly to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

NGF 'predictions' replay MD-derived force time series, so the Mori-GLE advantage is partly a replay artifact rather than an independent generative result.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV, 'Simulating GLES with Non-Gaussian Orthogonal Forces'; Appendix B, Eq. (B1)]
    "In this technique, which we refer to as the non-Gaussian force (NGF) method, realizations of the orthogonal force are computed from the MD trajectories using Eq. (16) and then used for the numerical solution of the GLE. The orthogonal-force realizations are derived from position trajectories and initial conditions different from those used as input for the NGF simulation. ... We compute realizations of FDPQ(t) from the given MD trajectories using Eq. (16) and insert them as realizations to solve Eq. (B1) numerically."

    Eq. (16) defines FQ(t) as a deterministic functional of the same MD trajectory that later supplies the 'predicted' observables: FQ = A-double-dot + Feff(A) + integral Gamma A-dot. Inserting these replayed forces into Eq. (B1) and comparing the resulting A(t) statistics with MD is therefore a filtered reconstruction of the input, not an independent generation of noise. For the Mori-GLE, the fluctuation-dissipation relation Eq. (5) is enforced by construction (Fig. 1d shows the ACF overlap), so two-point correlation reproduction is automatic. The PMF/MFPT agreement is inherited from the empirical force segments. The paper concedes in Sec.

  2. self definitional [Section IV, discussion of Fig. 3 (pages 6-7)]
    "The NGF technique based on Eq. (B1) in Appendix B without numerical errors should, hypothetically, perfectly reconstruct a trajectoryA(t) starting from initial conditions A0 and ˙A0, if using matching past velocities ˙A(t) and the appropriate orthogonal force computed from Eq. (16)."

    This sentence states the identity property: the NGF 'prediction' is an exact inversion of Eq. (16) whenever initial conditions and past velocities match. Since Eq. (16) is just the GLE (Eq. (12) or Eq. (4)) rearranged for FQ, and Eq. (B1) solves that same GLE with the replayed FQ, the trajectory reconstruction in Fig. 3 is by construction an inversion of the data-to-force map, not an independent test of the model. The Mori-GLE's longer-lasting alignment in Fig. 3 is a property of its linear filter stability, not evidence that the model predicts MD dihedral dynamics. The non-trivial test in Fig. 2 uses mismatched initial conditions and is contaminated by the dephasing artifact that the authors attribute to the other GLEs in Sec. S12.

full rationale

The paper contains a genuine, non-circular component: the extraction of memory kernels and orthogonal-force distributions from MD trajectories for three GLE formalisms is standard Volterra/filtering analysis, and the empirical finding of non-Gaussian orthogonal force distributions is not equivalent to its inputs. However, the central predictive claim—that the Mori-GLE 'offers the most numerically robust framework' and that 'modeling the orthogonal-force statistics is more crucial than including the non-linear PMF'—rests on the NGF simulation technique, which does not independently sample non-Gaussian noise. Eq. (16) computes FQ(t) as a deterministic filtering of the MD trajectory A(t), and Appendix B inserts those same FQ time series back into the GLE. The simulated A(t) is therefore a filtered version of the MD A(t). For the Mori-GLE the fluctuation-dissipation relation (Eq. 5) is satisfied by construction (Fig. 1d), so two-point functions are guaranteed; for the higher-order observables (PMF, MFPT) the information is carried by the replayed empirical forces rather than by any generative noise model. The paper explicitly concedes that an independent sampling method for non-Gaussian, higher-order correlated trajectories is needed. The trajectory-reconstruction test (Fig. 3) is explicitly acknowledged to be an exact inversion when initial conditions and past velocities match. The comparison among GLEs is further affected by the authors' own dephasing analysis (Sec. S12), which shows the replayed force is not conditioned on the simulated coordinate. This makes the central result partially circular (fitted input called prediction), though not fully definitional: the empirical non-Gaussian force statistics and the parameter extraction are independently meaningful. Score 7.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the empirical replay of orthogonal forces from MD trajectories, which is a circular input, and on the assumption that this replay is valid from different initial conditions. No new physical entities are introduced. The only hand-chosen parameters are the memory truncation time and the ME baseline fit.

free parameters (2)
  • memory truncation time tau_Gamma = 10 ps
    The memory kernel is truncated at 10 ps in all NGF simulations; chosen as the time after which the kernel has decayed to zero (Appendix B). Not fitted to target observables, but a parameter chosen by hand.
  • Markovian embedding fit constants = k_j, tau_j, w_j for 5 oscillatory exponentials
    In the baseline ME method (Sec. S7), the memory kernel is fitted to a sum of 5 oscillatory exponentials; these are free parameters for the comparison method, not for the central NGF result.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The GLE obtained from projection operators is an exact description of the dihedral angle dynamics when all parameters are extracted exactly.
    The paper assumes the Mori, DP, CM, and hybrid GLEs are exact decompositions of the Hamiltonian dynamics for the observable A (Sec. II.A).
  • ad hoc to paper The orthogonal force process can be meaningfully replayed from empirical MD segments in NGF simulations with different initial conditions.
    Appendix B assumes that orthogonal force realizations computed from MD trajectories via Eq. (16) are valid stochastic drivers when inserted into Eq. (B1) with arbitrary initial conditions; Sec. S12 shows the force distributions are position-dependent, undermining this assumption.
  • domain assumption The memory kernel is negligible after tau_Gamma = 10 ps.
    Appendix B truncates the memory convolution at 10 ps based on the observation that the kernel decays to zero; this is checked numerically but is an input to the simulation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analysis and Simulation of Generalized Langevin Equations with Non-Gaussian Orthogonal Forces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RAKM6CL5

@misc{pith2026250515665,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analysis and Simulation of Generalized Langevin Equations with Non-Gaussian Orthogonal Forces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RAKM6CL5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15665}
}
read the original abstract

The generalized Langevin equation (GLE) is a useful framework for analyzing and modeling the dynamics of many-body systems in terms of low-dimensional reaction coordinates, with its specific form determined by the choice of projection formalism. We compare parameters derived from different GLE formulations using molecular dynamics simulations of butane's dihedral angle dynamics. Our analysis reveals non-Gaussian contributions of the orthogonal force in different GLEs, being most enhanced for the Mori-GLE, where all non-linearities are relegated to the orthogonal force. We establish a simulation technique that correctly accounts for non-Gaussian orthogonal forces, which is critical for accurately predicting dihedral-angle mean first-passage times. We find that the accuracy of GLE simulations depends significantly on the chosen GLE formalism; the Mori-GLE offers the most numerically robust framework for capturing the statistical observables of the dihedral angle dynamics, provided the correct non-Gaussian orthogonal force distribution is used.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15665 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. GLE parameter extraction for butane dihedral angle dynamics. (a) Position-dependent mass profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Results for GLE simulations of butane dihedral dynamics. (a - c) Comparison of the PMF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Investigation of the NGF simulation numerical accuracy for butane dihedral trajectories. We compare three different dihedral trajec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The influence of multi-dimensionality and off-diagonal non-Markovian friction coupling on coarse-grained dynamics

    physics.chem-ph 2025-06 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 2D generalized Langevin equation with matrix memory predicts coupled dihedral kinetics in pentane better than 1D models, mostly through the 2D potential, while alanine dipeptide rates gain nothing from the 2D treatment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. S. Plotkin and P. G. Wolynes. Non-Markovian Configurational Diffusion and Reaction Coordinates for Protein Folding . Physical Review Letters , 80(22):5015, 1998

    1998

  2. [2]

    Monticelli, S

    L. Monticelli, S. K. Kandasamy, X. Periole, R. G. Larson, D. P. Tieleman, and S.-J. Marrink. The MARTINI Coarse-Grained Force Field: Extension to Proteins . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , 4(5):819--834, 2008

    2008

  3. [3]

    Clementi

    C. Clementi. Coarse-Grained Models of Protein Folding: Toy Models or Predictive Tools? Current Opinion in Structural Biology , 18(1):10--15, 2008

    2008

  4. [4]

    R. D. Hills Jr and C. L. Brooks III. Insights from Coarse-Grained G \=o Models for Protein Folding and Dynamics . International Journal of Molecular Sciences , 10(3):889--905, 2009

    2009

  5. [5]

    Minichino and G

    C. Minichino and G. A. Voth. Potential Energy Surfaces for Chemical Reactions: An Analytical Representation From Coarse Grained Data with an Application to Proton Transfer in Water . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 101(23):4544--4552, 1997

    1997

  6. [6]

    S. C. L. Kamerlin, S. Vicatos, A. Dryga, and A. Warshel. Coarse-Grained (Multiscale) Simulations in Studies of Biophysical and Chemical Systems . Annual Review of Physical Chemistry , 62(1):41--64, 2011

    2011

  7. [7]

    S. Zhou, R. G. Wei , L.-T. Cheng, J. Dzubiella, J. A. McCammon, and B. Li. Variational Implicit-Solvent Predictions of the Dry--Wet Transition Pathways for Ligand--Receptor Binding and Unbinding Kinetics . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 116(30):14989--14994, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    F. N. Br \"u nig, P. Hillmann, W. K. Kim, J. O. Daldrop, and R. R. Netz. Proton-Transfer Spectroscopy Beyond the Normal-Mode Scenario . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 157(17):174116, 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    B. J. Berne, J. P. Boon, and S. A. Rice. On the Calculation of Autocorrelation Functions of Dynamical Variables . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 45(4):1086--1096, 1966

    1966

  2. [10]

    S. A. Adelman. Generalized Langevin Theory for Many-Body Problems in Chemical Dynamics: Reactions in Liquids . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 73(7):3145--3158, 1980

    1980

  3. [11]

    B. J. Berne, M. E. Tuckerman, J. E. Straub, and A. L. R. Bug. Dynamic Friction on Rigid and Flexible Bonds . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 93(7):5084--5095, 1990

    1990

  4. [12]

    A. J. Chorin, O. H. Hald, and R. Kupferman. Optimal Prediction and the Mori-Zwanzig Representation of Irreversible Processes . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 97(7):2968--2973, 2000

    2000

  5. [13]

    A. J. Chorin, O. H. Hald, and R. Kupferman. Optimal Prediction with Memory . Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 166(3-4):239--257, 2002

    2002

  6. [14]

    E. Darve. Numerical Methods for Calculating the Potential of Mean Force . New Algorithms for Macromolecular Simulation , pages 213--249, 2006

    2006

  7. [15]

    O. F. Lange and H. Grubm \"u ller. Collective Langevin Dynamics of Conformational Motions in Proteins . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 124(21):214903, 2006

    2006

  8. [16]

    Carof, R

    A. Carof, R. Vuilleumier, and B. Rotenberg. Two Algorithms to Compute Projected Correlation Functions in Molecular Dynamics Simulations . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 140(12):124103, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    L. Ma, X. Li, and C. Liu. The Derivation and Approximation of Coarse-Grained Dynamics from Langevin Dynamics . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 145(20):204117, 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    H. S. Lee, S.-H. Ahn, and E. F. Darve. The Multi-Dimensional Generalized Langevin Equation for Conformational Motion of Proteins . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 150(17):174113, 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    S. A. M. Loos and S. H. L. Klapp. Heat Flow Due to Time-Delayed Feedback . Scientific reports , 9(1):2491, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Klippenstein, M

    V. Klippenstein, M. Tripathy, G. Jung, F. Schmid, and N. F. A. van der Vegt. Introducing Memory in Coarse-grained Molecular Simulations . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 125(19):4931--4954, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    T. J. Doerries, S. A. M. Loos, and S. H. L. Klapp. Correlation Functions of Non-Markovian Systems out of Equilibrium: Analytical Expressions Beyond Single-Exponential Memory . Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , 2021(3):033202, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Bagchi and D

    B. Bagchi and D. W. Oxtoby. The Effect of Frequency Dependent Friction on Isomerization Dynamics in Solution . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 78(5):2735--2741, 1983

    1983

  15. [23]

    J. E. Straub, M. Borkovec, and B. J. Berne. Calculation of Dynamic Friction on Intramolecular Degrees of Freedom . Journal of Physical Chemistry , 91(19):4995--4998, 1987

    1987

  16. [24]

    Canales and G

    M. Canales and G. Sese. Generalized Langevin Dynamics Simulations of NaCl Electrolyte Solutions . The Journal of ChemicalPphysics , 109(14):6004--6011, 1998

    1998

  17. [25]

    Satija and D

    R. Satija and D. E. Makarov. Generalized Langevin equation as a Model for Barrier Crossing Dynamics in Biomolecular Folding . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 123(4):802--810, 2019

    2019

  18. [26]

    C. Ayaz, L. Tepper, F. N. Br \"u nig, J. Kappler, J. O. Daldrop, and R. R. Netz. Non-Markovian Modeling of Protein Folding . 118(31):e2023856118, 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    B. A. Dalton, C. Ayaz, H. Kiefer, A. Klimek, L. Tepper, and R. R. Netz. Fast Protein Folding is Governed by Memory-Dependent Friction . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 120(31):e2220068120, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    B. A. Dalton, H. Kiefer, and R. R. Netz. The Role of Memory-Dependent Friction and Solvent Viscosity in Isomerization Kinetics in Viscogenic Media . Nature Communications , 15(1):3761, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Milster, F

    S. Milster, F. Koch, C. Widder, T. Schilling, and J. Dzubiella. Tracer Dynamics in Polymer Networks: Generalized Langevin dDscription . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 160(9), 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    F. N. Br \"u nig, J. O. Daldrop, and R. R. Netz. Pair-Reaction Dynamics in Water: Competition of Memory, Potential Shape, and Inertial Effects . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 126(49):10295--10304, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Vroylandt, L

    H. Vroylandt, L. Gouden \`e ge, P. Monmarch \'e , F. Pietrucci, and B. Rotenberg. Likelihood-Based Non-Markovian Models from Molecular Dynamics . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 119(13):e2117586119, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    F. N. Br \"u nig, O. Geburtig, A. von Canal, J. Kappler, and R. R. Netz. Time-Dependent Friction Effects on Vibrational Infrared Frequencies and Line Shapes of Liquid Water . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 126(7):1579--1589, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    R. Zwanzig. Memory Effects in Irreversible Thermodynamics . Physical Review , 124(4):983, 1961

    1961

  26. [34]

    H. Mori. Transport, Collective Motion, and Brownian Motion . Progress of Theoretical Physics , 33(3):423--455, 1965

    1965

  27. [35]

    Mazur and D

    P. Mazur and D. Bedeaux. When and Why is the Random Force in Brownian Motion a Gaussian Process . Biophysical Chemistry , 41(1):41--49, 1991

    1991

  28. [36]

    Vroylandt and P

    H. Vroylandt and P. Monmarch \'e . Position-Dependent Memory Kernel in Generalized Langevin Equations: Theory and Numerical Estimation . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 156(24):244105, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Z. Li, H. S. Lee, E. Darve, and G. E. Karniadakis. Computing the Non-Markovian Coarse-Grained Interactions Derived from the Mori-Zwanzig Formalism in Molecular Systems: Application to Polymer Melts . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 146(1):014104, 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    Di Cairano

    L. Di Cairano. On the Derivation of a Nonlinear Generalized Langevin Equation . Journal of Physics Communications , 6(1):015002, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Dynamic Coarse-Graining of Linear and Non-Linear Systems: Mori-Zwanzig Formalism and Beyond

    Bernd Jung and Gerhard Jung. Dynamic Coarse-Graining of Linear and Non-Linear Systems: Mori-Zwanzig Formalism and Beyond . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 159(8), 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    C. Ayaz, L. Scalfi, B. A. Dalton, and R. R. Netz. Generalized Langevin Equation with a Nonlinear Potential of Mean Force and Nonlinear Memory Friction From a Hybrid Projection Scheme . Physical Review E , 105:054138, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    J. O. Daldrop, J. Kappler, F. N. Br \"u nig, and R. R. Netz. Butane Dihedral Angle Dynamics in Water is Dominated by Internal Friction . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 115(20):5169--5174, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    B. A. Dalton, A. Klimek, H. Kiefer, F. N. Br \"u nig, H. Colinet, L. Tepper, A. Abbasi, and R. R. Netz. Memory and Friction: From the Nanoscale to the Macroscale . Annual Review of Physical Chemistry , 76, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Vroylandt

    H. Vroylandt. On the Derivation of the Generalized Langevin Equation and the Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem . Europhysics Letters , 140(6):62003, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Ceriotti, G

    M. Ceriotti, G. Bussi, and M. Parrinello. Colored-noise Thermostats \`a la Carte . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , 6(4):1170--1180, 2010

    2010

  37. [45]

    Wiesenfeld, D

    K. Wiesenfeld, D. Pierson, E. Pantazelou, C. Dames, and F. Moss. Stochastic Resonance on a Circle . Physical Review Letters , 72(14):2125, 1994

    1994

  38. [46]

    H. S. Wio and S. Bouzat. Stochastic Resonance: The Role of Potential Asymmetry and Non Gaussian Noises . Brazilian Journal of Physics , 29:136--143, 1999

    1999

  39. [47]

    B. Wang, S. M Anthony, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick. Anomalous Yet Brownian . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 106(36):15160--15164, 2009

    2009

  40. [48]

    B. Wang, J. Kuo, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick. When Brownian Diffusion is Not Gaussian . Nature Materials , 11(6):481--485, 2012

    2012

  41. [49]

    H. K. Shin, C. Kim, P. Talkner, and E. K. Lee. Brownian Motion from Molecular Dynamics . Chemical Physics , 375(2-3):316--326, 2010

    2010

  42. [50]

    Kanazawa, T

    K. Kanazawa, T. G. Sano, T. Sagawa, and H. Hayakawa. Minimal Model of Stochastic Athermal Systems: Origin of Non-Gaussian Noise . Physical Review Letters , 114(9):090601, 2015

    2015

  43. [51]

    R. Zwanzig. A Chemical Langevin Equation with Non-Gaussian Noise . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 105(28):6472--6473, 2001

    2001

  44. [52]

    H. S. Wio and R. Toral. Effect of Non-Gaussian Noise Sources in a Noise-Induced Transition . Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 193(1-4):161--168, 2004

    2004

  45. [53]

    Majee, G

    P. Majee, G. Goswami, and B. C. Bag. Colored Non-Gaussian Noise Induced Resonant Activation . Chemical Physics Letters , 416(4-6):256--260, 2005

    2005

  46. [54]

    A. V. Chechkin, F. Seno, R. Metzler, and I. M. Sokolov. Brownian Yet Non-Gaussian Diffusion: from Superstatistics to Subordination of Diffusing Diffusivities . Physical Review X , 7(2):021002, 2017

    2017

  47. [55]

    N. M. Mutothya, Y. Xu, Y. Li, R. Metzler, and N. M. Mutua. First Passage Dynamics of Stochastic Motion in Heterogeneous Media Driven by Correlated White Gaussian and Coloured Non-Gaussian Noises . Journal of Physics: Complexity , 2(4):045012, 2021

    2021

  48. [56]

    Baule and P

    A. Baule and P. Sollich. Exponential Increase of Transition Rates in Metastable Systems Driven by Non-Gaussian Noise . Scientific Reports , 13(1):3853, 2023

    2023

  49. [57]

    Caspers and M

    J. Caspers and M. Kr \"u ger. Nonlinear Langevin Functionals for a Driven Probe . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 161(12), 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Widder, F

    C. Widder, F. Koch, and T. Schilling. Generalized Langevin Dynamics Simulation with Non-Stationary Memory Kernels: How to Make Noise . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 157(19), 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    Glatzel and T

    F. Glatzel and T. Schilling. The Interplay Between Memory and Potentials of Mean Force: A Discussion on the Structure of Equations of Motion for Coarse-Grained Observables . Europhysics Letters , 136(3):36001, 2022

    2022

  52. [60]

    R. Zwanzig. Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics . Oxford university press, 2001

    2001

  53. [61]

    N. Wolf, V. Klippenstein, and N. F. A. Van der Vegt. Cross-Correlations in the Fluctuation--Dissipation Relation Influence Barrier-Crossing Dynamics . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 162(5), 2025

    2025

  54. [62]

    Medina, R

    E. Medina, R. Satija, and D. E. Makarov. Transition Path Times in Non-Markovian Activated Rate Processes . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 122(49):11400--11413, 2018

    2018

  55. [63]

    Kappler, F

    J. Kappler, F. No \'e , and R. R. Netz. Cyclization and Relaxation Dynamics of Finite-Length Collapsed Self-Avoiding Polymers . Physical Review Letters , 122(6):067801, 2019

    2019

  56. [64]

    C. Ayaz, L. Tepper, and R. R. Netz. Self-Consistent Markovian Embedding of Generalized Langevin Equations with Configuration-Dependent Mass and a Nonlinear Friction Kernel . Turkish Journal of Physics , 46(6):194--205, 2022

    2022

  57. [65]

    B. J. Berne and G. D. Harp. On the Calculation of Time Correlation Functions . Adv. Chem. Phys , 17:63--227, 1970

    1970

  58. [66]

    Kowalik, J

    B. Kowalik, J. O. Daldrop, J. Kappler, J. C. F. Schulz, A. Schlaich, and R. R. Netz. Memory-Kernel Extraction for Different Molecular Solutes in Solvents of Varying Viscosity in Confinement . Physical Review E , 100(1):012126, 2019

    2019

  59. [67]

    Darve, J

    E. Darve, J. Solomon, and A. Kia. Computing Generalized Langevin Equations and Generalized Fokker--Planck Equations . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 106(27):10884--10889, 2009

    2009

  60. [68]

    Q. Zhou, R. R. Netz, and B. A. Dalton. Rapid State-Recrossing Kinetics in Non-Markovian Systems . arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06604 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    B. G. Mitterwallner, C. Schreiber, J. O. Daldrop, J. O. R \"a dler, and R. R. Netz. Non-Markovian Data-Driven Modeling of Single-Cell Motility . Physical Review E , 101(3):032408, 2020

    2020

  62. [70]

    Klimek, D

    A. Klimek, D. Mondal, S. Block, P. Sharma, and R. R. Netz. Data-driven Classification of Individual Cells by their Non-Markovian Motion . Biophysical Journal , 123(10):1173--1183, 2024

    2024

  63. [71]

    Tepper, B

    L. Tepper, B. A. Dalton, and R. R. Netz. Accurate Memory Kernel Extraction from Discretized Time-Series Data . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , 2024

    2024

  64. [72]

    Kiefer, D

    H. Kiefer, D. Furtel, C. Ayaz, A. Klimek, J. O. Daldrop, and R. R. Netz. Predictability Analysis and Prediction of Discrete Weather and Financial Time-Series Data with a Hamiltonian-Based Filter-Projection Approach . arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.15026 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Pronk, S

    S. Pronk, S. P \'a ll, R. Schulz, P. Larsson, P. Bjelkmar, R. Apostolov, M. R. Shirts, J. C. Smith, P. M. Kasson, D. van der Spoel, et al. GROMACS 4.5: a High-Throughput and Highly Parallel Open Source Molecular Simulation Toolkit . Bioinformatics , 29(7):845--854, 2013

    2013

  66. [74]

    Oostenbrink, A

    C. Oostenbrink, A. Villa, A. E. Mark, and W. F. Van Gunsteren . A Biomolecular Force Field based on the Free Enthalpy of Hydration and Solvation: The GROMOS Force-Field Parameter Sets 53A5 and 53A6 . Journal of Computational Chemistry , 25(13):1656--1676, oct 2004

    2004

  67. [75]

    Ryckaert, G

    J.-P. Ryckaert, G. Ciccotti, and H. J. C. Berendsen. Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes . Journal of Computational Physics , 23(3):327--341, 1977

    1977

  68. [76]

    H. J. C. Berendsen, J. R. Grigera, and T. P. Straatsma. The Missing Term in Effective Pair Potentials . Journal of Physical Chemistry , 91(24):6269--6271, 1987

    1987

  69. [77]

    H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak. Molecular Dynamics with Coupling to an External Bath . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 81(8):3684--3690, 1984

    1984

  70. [78]

    Bussi, D

    G. Bussi, D. Donadio, and M. Parrinello. Canonical Sampling Through Velocity Rescaling . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 126(1):014101, 2007

    2007

  71. [79]

    Darden, D

    T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen. Particle Mesh Ewald: An N log(N) Method for Ewald Sums in Large Systems . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 98(12):10089--10092, jun 1993

    1993

  72. [80]

    F. J. Dyson. The Radiation Theories of Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman . Physical Review , 75(3):486, 1949

    1949

  73. [81]

    Grabert, P

    H. Grabert, P. H \"a nggi, and P. Talkner. Microdynamics and Nonlinear Stochastic Processes of Gross Variables . Journal of Statistical Physics , 22(5):537--552, 1980

    1980

  74. [82]

    Samanta and D

    T. Samanta and D. V. Matyushov. Dielectric Friction, Violation of the Stokes-Einstein-Debye Relation, and Non-Gaussian Transport Dynamics of Dipolar Solutes in Water . Physical Review Research , 3(2):023025, 2021

    2021

  75. [83]

    Touchette

    H. Touchette. Introduction to Dynamical Large Deviations of Markov Processes . Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 504:5--19, 2018

    2018

  76. [84]

    R. L. Jack. Ergodicity and Large Deviations in Physical Systems with Stochastic Dynamics . The European Physical Journal B , 93:1--22, 2020

    2020

  77. [85]

    A. G. Cherstvy, S. Thapa, C. E. Wagner, and R. Metzler. Non-Gaussian, Non-Ergodic, and Non-Fickian Diffusion of Tracers in Mucin Hydrogels . Soft Matter , 15(12):2526--2551, 2019

    2019

  78. [86]

    Kappler, J

    J. Kappler, J. O. Daldrop, F. N. Br \"u nig, M. D. Boehle, and R. R. Netz. Memory-Induced Acceleration and Slowdown of Barrier Crossing . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 148(1):014903, 2018

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.