Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

The chromoelectric adjoint correlators in Euclidean space at next-to-leading order

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A next-to-leading-order calculation in thermal QCD shows that two of the three adjoint chromoelectric correlators are asymmetric on the thermal circle, with the asymmetry coming entirely from Wilson-line Matsubara zero modes.

desk verdict First NLO adjoint chromoelectric correlators with a clean zero-mode explanation of the thermal-circle asymmetry; the mechanism and eq. (3.38) look right, but eq. (C.1) is short by a factor of pi on my check and the numerical input is unaudited. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.16604 v2 pith:HPD4X5MF submitted 2025-05-22 hep-ph hep-latnucl-th

Nora Brambilla , Panayiotis Panayiotou , Saga Säppi , Antonio Vairo This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-latnucl-th
keywords chromoelectriccorrelatorsadjointWilsonlinesquark-gluonplasmaquarkoniumtransportthermalQCDnext-to-leadingorderMatsubarazeromodeslatticecomparison
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper evaluates the three gauge-invariant thermal-QCD correlators built from two chromoelectric fields connected by adjoint Wilson lines at next-to-leading order in the weak-coupling expansion, the quantities from which quarkonium transport coefficients in a quark–gluon plasma can be extracted. The upper and lower correlators acquire an antisymmetric part under $t\to 1/T-t$, while the symmetric correlator remains symmetric and matches the fundamental-representation correlator up to Casimir rescaling. The antisymmetric part is traced entirely to Matsubara zero modes of the Wilson lines, which measure the length of the line and therefore distinguish the two sides of the thermal circle. The final expressions, including order-$g_s^5$ soft corrections, agree with recent high-temperature lattice data and reproduce the lattice-observed skewing of the correlator.

What carries the argument

The central object is the adjoint Wilson line on the Euclidean thermal circle together with the Matsubara zero mode of the temporal gluon field running on it. In the two-loop diagrams this zero mode produces the integral $Z^1_{011}(t)$, which is $O(\varepsilon)$ in dimensional regularisation and antisymmetric under $t\to 1/T-t$; weighted by the Wilson-line length $t$ or $-(1/T-t)$ it generates the asymmetry. The remaining two-loop sums are mostly reduced by integration-by-parts identities to products of one-loop thermal integrals $E^a_m(t)$ with closed polylogarithmic forms; a single nonfactorisable convolution $I(t)$ is evaluated numerically to $O(\varepsilon)$ after subtracting its ultraviolet divergence. The complete result is gauge independent after summing all diagrams.

What would settle it

Evaluate the nonfactorisable integral $I(t)$ with an independent subtraction and integration method and compare the $[I]^{(1)}(t)$ term with the paper's curve; a deviation larger than the stated roughly 1% would shift the NLO correlators by more than the quoted uncertainties. Alternatively, lattice data for $\langle EE\rangle_U-\langle EE\rangle_L$ across the whole thermal circle at $T\sim 10^3$--$10^4 T_c$ would settle whether the asymmetry really has the $\zeta(4,Tt)-\zeta(4,1-Tt)$ form.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At next-to-leading order the upper and lower adjoint chromoelectric correlators are no longer symmetric under $t\leftrightarrow 1/T-t$; their antisymmetric part is, with $\varepsilon$ the dimensional-regulator parameter, $$\langle EE\rangle_A(t)=\frac{3}{(2\pi)^3}\pi d_A N_c $g_s^{4}$\big[\zeta(4,Tt)-\zeta(4,1-Tt)\big]+O(\varepsilon).$$ The paper attributes this asymmetry exclusively to the Matsubara zero mode of the Wilson-line gauge field: the zero-mode contribution is proportional to the Wilson-line length, which is $t$ for the upper correlator and $1/T-t$ for the lower one. The symmetric correlator is shown to agree, up to Casimir scaling, with the fundamental-representation correlator of heavy-quark diffusion, and the NLO evaluation of that fundamental correlator is given for the first time. Renormalisation of the strong coupling removes all ultraviolet divergences, and the resulting finite correlators plus their $g_s^5$ soft part agree well with pure-gauge lattice results at $T\simeq 10^4 T_c$, both in shape and in the size of the asymmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The central results rest on the numerical evaluation of one nonfactorisable two-loop convolution integral, which the paper reports to roughly 1% accuracy without a rigorous error bound; an error there would propagate directly into the final correlators and the lattice comparison.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At leading order in the asymmetry, the standard spectral representation that assumes $\langle EE\rangle(t)=\langle EE\rangle(1/T-t)$ must be generalised when extracting quarkonium transport coefficients from these correlators.
  • The closed form (3.38) gives lattice practitioners a concrete target: the antisymmetric part of the upper correlator should follow $\zeta(4,Tt)-\zeta(4,1-Tt)$ in the weak-coupling regime.
  • Because the symmetric correlator coincides with the fundamental correlator up to Casimir scaling, existing and future NLO results for one directly transfer to the other.
  • The result that zero modes are the exclusive source of the asymmetry at NLO identifies the integrals that must be controlled to extend the calculation to higher orders.
  • The substantial $N_f$ dependence of the NLO correlators implies that future precision lattice comparisons should include dynamical quarks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Wilson-line zero modes remain the only source of the asymmetry at all orders, the asymmetry is a genuine path-length effect tied to the non-local Wilson line rather than to local operator mixing; testing this would require a next-to-next-to-leading-order check.
  • The functional form $\zeta(4,Tt)-\zeta(4,1-Tt)$ may be a universal signature of such path-length asymmetries and could be compared with analogous calculations in smaller gauge groups or lower dimensions where the zero-mode integral is exactly solvable.
  • Lattice computations in the weak-coupling window could measure the upper and lower correlators separately and use their difference as a clean, normalisation-insensitive probe of the zero-mode contribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes, in thermal Euclidean QCD at weak coupling, three gauge-invariant correlators built from two chromoelectric fields joined by adjoint Wilson lines: the upper, lower, and symmetric correlators. The calculation is performed to next-to-leading order using diagrammatic methods, integration-by-parts reduction, and dimensional regularisation with MS renormalisation. The paper identifies a single non-factorisable two-loop convolution integral, evaluated numerically in Appendix B, and an analytic zero-mode contribution, Z^1_011(t), that is shown to be the unique source of the asymmetry between the upper and lower correlators on the thermal circle. The final renormalised NLO expressions are compared with lattice data from the companion paper [42], with particular emphasis on the asymmetry, and the agreement is reported as good.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides the first direct NLO evaluation of the adjoint chromoelectric correlators in Euclidean space and gives a closed-form, analytic explanation of the lattice-observed asymmetry: Eq. (3.38) identifies the asymmetry with Wilson-line Matsubara zero modes. The calculation is self-contained, gauge-parameter independence is checked, renormalisation is treated consistently, and the symmetric/fundamental correlator is cross-checked against the known spectral-function result of ref. [44]. No parameters are fitted to lattice data, and the central asymmetry formula is a falsifiable prediction independent of the numerical convolution integral. The main weakness is that the complete NLO result and the lattice comparison rely on a numerical evaluation that is not currently reproducible, and the final explicit formula in Appendix C contains an apparent inconsistency with the quoted asymmetry.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B.5)-(B.8)] The O(epsilon) term [I]^(1)(t), which enters the renormalised correlator in Eq. (C.1) and therefore the lattice comparison in Fig. 4, is obtained by numerical integration with only the statement that it is accurate to roughly 1% for Tt < 0.98. No code, no tabulated data, and no convergence or error-bound analysis are provided. Because this is the single non-factorisable input to the central NLO expression, please provide the numerical data or code, a convergence test showing that the subtraction in Eq. (B.5) is stable, and an estimate of the resulting uncertainty propagated into the final correlator bands. Without this, the NLO result and the stated agreement with lattice data are not independently verifiable.
  2. [Appendix C, Eq. (C.1)] The antisymmetric terms in the final formula do not appear to reproduce Eq. (3.38). Using the identity stated after Eq. (C.1), Im Li^(1)_(-3)(e^{2i pi T t}) = -3[zeta(4,Tt)-zeta(4,1-Tt)]/(16 pi^3), the contribution of the term -4T lambda(W_I) Im Li^(1)_(-3) to (langle EE rangle_U - langle EE rangle_L)/2 is 3/(8 pi^3) [zeta(4,Tt)-zeta(4,1-Tt)], which differs by a factor pi from the coefficient in Eq. (3.38). In addition, the term +2 Im Li^(1)_0 appears with the same sign for the upper and lower correlators as written, so it is not odd under the t -> 1/T - t reflection that relates them. Please show explicitly how Eq. (C.1) reduces to Eq. (3.38), or correct the formula.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Eq. (3.13)] The convolution variable t' is introduced in the Wilson-line time integral, but its integration domain is not stated until Eq. (3.32). Please state the domain (0,t) explicitly at first use, since it is essential to the distinction between the upper and lower correlators in Eqs. (3.28)-(3.29).
  2. [Figure 7 and text after Eq. (B.6)] The caption attributes the bands to variations around the PMS scale, but the term [I]^(1)(t) itself is scale-independent; the scale dependence enters through [I]^(1,\bar{\Lambda})(t) ln(\bar{\Lambda}/T). Please clarify what is varied in the figure.
  3. [Section 4, paragraph on numerical evaluation] The text states that contributions are not shown for Tt < 0.05 and Tt > 0.95, but the right panels of Fig. 2 extend to Tt = 0.98. Please make the quoted cut consistent with the figures, or specify that the cut applies only to the numerical convolution integral and not to the analytic parts of the result.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the NLO correlators are derived from QCD Feynman rules without fitted inputs, and the lattice data enter only as an external comparison.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained perturbative QCD: the correlators are defined in eqs. (2.1)-(2.3), the one-loop sum-integrals are evaluated in closed form in eq. (B.1), the two-loop integrals are reduced by the integration-by-parts identity in eq. (3.9), and the single nonfactorisable convolution integral is defined in eqs. (3.13) and (B.4)-(B.5). No parameter is fitted to the lattice data; the renormalisation scale is taken from earlier literature [44,46] and varied only to estimate uncertainty. The headline antisymmetric result, eq. (3.38), follows analytically from the closed-form zero-mode integral Z^1_011(t) in eq. (3.17), and does not depend on the numerically evaluated term [I]^(1)(t). The lattice comparison in figures 4 and 6 is an external benchmark, not an input to the derivation. The paper itself discloses the main non-circular limitation in Appendix B: the numerical evaluation of [I]^(1)(t) is performed to roughly 1% accuracy, with no code or tabulated data supplied and with delicate cancellations near the edges of the thermal circle. That is a reproducibility and accuracy risk, not a circularity, because the numerical integral is not fitted to the quantity it is used to predict. Self-citations such as [44,46] are used for renormalisation-scale conventions and soft spectral input, but the cited results are independent perturbative or lattice results and do not themselves contain the present paper's target correlators. No definitional identification, renamed fit, or self-citation chain forces the claimed result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data: the inputs are N_c, N_f, T, and the renormalisation scale chosen from earlier literature. The axioms are the standard perturbative machinery and the physical assumptions of weak coupling and complete soft contributions. The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or other invented entities.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Standard integration-by-parts identities reduce the two-loop sum-integrals to products of one-loop integrals (eq. 3.9 and refs. [47,48]).
    Invoked in section 3.2 and used throughout to scalarise and factorise the two-loop contributions.
  • domain assumption The thermal medium is weakly coupled at the temperatures considered, so the leading-order and next-to-leading-order perturbative expansion in g_s is valid.
    The entire calculation is performed in a weak-coupling expansion, and the lattice comparison is restricted to T = 10^4 Tc where this assumption is most defensible; the paper itself notes perturbation theory breaks down near the edges of the thermal circle.
  • domain assumption The soft (Debye-scale) contributions are completely accounted for by the hard thermal loop resummed order-g_s^5 correction of eq. (3.39), taken from ref. [44].
    Stated in section 3.9, where the authors argue that HTL-resummed diagrams of the types (3.2)-(3.5) are suppressed by at least g_s^2 relative to the g_s^5 term.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The chromoelectric adjoint correlators in Euclidean space at next-to-leading order." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HPD4X5MF

@misc{pith2026250516604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The chromoelectric adjoint correlators in Euclidean space at next-to-leading order},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HPD4X5MF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.16604}
}
read the original abstract

The physics of quarkonium created in heavy-ion collisions is intrinsically connected to the correlation functions of adjoint chromoelectric fields in quantum chromodynamics. We study such correlation functions in a weak-coupling expansion in a thermal medium. We identify three distinct gauge-invariant correlators, and evaluate them to next-to-leading order. Two of the resulting correlators turn out to be asymmetric. We pinpoint the source of this asymmetry to Matsubara zero modes associated with Wilson lines. The results are shown to agree well with recent lattice calculations at high temperatures.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lattice study of correlators for quarkonium decay

    hep-lat 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Lattice QCD results show the color electric correlator relevant for quarkonium decay is not symmetric about τT=1/2 and agrees with NLO perturbation theory at T=10^4 Tc.

  2. Adjoint chromoelectric correlators for heavy quarkonium diffusion

    hep-lat 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    First lattice measurement of adjoint chromoelectric correlators shows they scale with the fundamental heavy-quark diffusion correlator by the perturbative factors 5/4 and 9/4.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [44]

    Burnier, M

    Y. Burnier, M. Laine, J. Langelage and L. Mether,Colour-electric spectral function at next-to-leading order,JHEP08(2010) 094 [1006.0867]

    arXiv 2010

  2. [1]

    Matsui and H

    T. Matsui and H. Satz,J/ψSuppression by Quark-Gluon Plasma Formation,Phys. Lett. B 178(1986) 416. – 27 – [2]PHENIXcollaboration,J/ψsuppression at forward rapidity in Au+Au collisions at√sN N= 200GeV,Phys. Rev. C84(2011) 054912 [1103.6269]. [3]ALICEcollaboration,J/ψsuppression at forward rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at√sN N= 2.76TeV,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(201...

    work page arXiv 1986

  3. [7]

    Karsch, M.T

    F. Karsch, M.T. Mehr and H. Satz,Color Screening and Deconfinement for Bound States of Heavy Quarks,Z. Phys. C37(1988) 617

    1988

  4. [8]

    Quarkonium Interactions in Hadronic Matter

    D. Kharzeev and H. Satz,Quarkonium interactions in hadronic matter,Phys. Lett. B334 (1994) 155 [hep-ph/9405414]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  5. [9]

    X.-M. Xu, D. Kharzeev, H. Satz and X.-N. Wang,J/ψsuppression in an equilibrating parton plasma,Phys. Rev. C53(1996) 3051 [hep-ph/9511331]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  6. [10]

    Grandchamp and R

    L. Grandchamp and R. Rapp,Thermal versus directJ/ψproduction in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,Phys. Lett. B523(2001) 60 [hep-ph/0103124]

    arXiv 2001

  7. [11]

    Grandchamp and R

    L. Grandchamp and R. Rapp,Charmonium suppression and regeneration from SPS to RHIC,Nucl. Phys. A709(2002) 415 [hep-ph/0205305]

    arXiv 2002

  8. [12]

    Laine, O

    M. Laine, O. Philipsen, P. Romatschke and M. Tassler,Real-time static potential in hot QCD,JHEP03(2007) 054 [hep-ph/0611300]

    arXiv 2007

Show all 50 references
  1. [13]

    Brambilla, J

    N. Brambilla, J. Ghiglieri, A. Vairo and P. Petreczky,Static quark-antiquark pairs at finite temperature,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 014017 [0804.0993]

    2008 arXiv

  2. [14]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, J. Ghiglieri and A. Vairo,Thermal width and gluo-dissociation of quarkonium in pNRQCD,JHEP12(2011) 116 [1109.5826]

    2011 arXiv

  3. [15]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, J. Ghiglieri and A. Vairo,Thermal width and quarkonium dissociation by inelastic parton scattering,JHEP05(2013) 130 [1303.6097]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [16]

    Braun-Munzinger and J

    P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel,(Non)thermal aspects of charmonium production and a new look atJ/ψsuppression,Phys. Lett. B490(2000) 196 [nucl-th/0007059]

    2000 arXiv

  5. [17]

    Thews, M

    R.L. Thews, M. Schroedter and J. Rafelski,EnhancedJ/ψproduction in deconfined quark matter,Phys. Rev. C63(2001) 054905 [hep-ph/0007323]

    2001 arXiv

  6. [18]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich and J. Stachel,Evidence for charmonium generation at the phase boundary in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions,Phys. Lett. B652 (2007) 259 [nucl-th/0701079]. – 28 –

    2007 arXiv

  7. [19]

    Zhao and R

    X. Zhao and R. Rapp,Transverse Momentum Spectra ofJ/ψin Heavy-Ion Collisions,Phys. Lett. B664(2008) 253 [0712.2407]

    2008 arXiv

  8. [20]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, A. Islam, M. Strickland, A. Tiwari, A. Vairo et al., Regeneration of bottomonia in an open quantum systems approach,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) L011502 [2302.11826]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [21]

    Caswell and G.P

    W.E. Caswell and G.P. Lepage,Effective Lagrangians for Bound State Problems in QED, QCD, and Other Field Theories,Phys. Lett. B167(1986) 437

    1986

  10. [22]

    Bodwin, E

    G.T. Bodwin, E. Braaten and G.P. Lepage,Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 1125 [hep-ph/9407339]

    1995 arXiv

  11. [23]

    Brambilla, A

    N. Brambilla, A. Pineda, J. Soto and A. Vairo,Effective Field Theories for Heavy Quarkonium,Rev. Mod. Phys.77(2005) 1423 [hep-ph/0410047]

    2005 arXiv

  12. [24]

    Escobedo and J

    M.A. Escobedo and J. Soto,Non-relativistic bound states at finite temperature (I): The Hydrogen atom,Phys. Rev. A78(2008) 032520 [0804.0691]

    2008 arXiv

  13. [25]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, J. Ghiglieri, J. Soto and A. Vairo,Heavy Quarkonium in a weakly-coupled quark-gluon plasma below the melting temperature,JHEP09(2010) 038 [1007.4156]

    2010 arXiv

  14. [26]

    Akamatsu and A

    Y. Akamatsu and A. Rothkopf,Stochastic potential and quantum decoherence of heavy quarkonium in the quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 105011 [1110.1203]

    2012 arXiv

  15. [27]

    Akamatsu,Heavy quark master equations in the Lindblad form at high temperatures, Phys

    Y. Akamatsu,Heavy quark master equations in the Lindblad form at high temperatures, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 056002 [1403.5783]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [28]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, J. Soto and A. Vairo,Quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions: an open quantum system approach,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 034021 [1612.07248]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [29]

    Blaizot and M.A

    J.-P. Blaizot and M.A. Escobedo,Quantum and classical dynamics of heavy quarks in a quark-gluon plasma,JHEP06(2018) 034 [1711.10812]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [30]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, J. Soto and A. Vairo,Heavy quarkonium suppression in a fireball,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 074009 [1711.04515]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [31]

    Yao and T

    X. Yao and T. Mehen,Quarkonium in-medium transport equation derived from first principles,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 096028 [1811.07027]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [32]

    Blaizot and M.A

    J.-P. Blaizot and M.A. Escobedo,Approach to equilibrium of a quarkonium in a quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 074007 [1803.07996]

    2018 arXiv

  21. [33]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, A. Vairo and P. Vander Griend,Transport coefficients from in medium quarkonium dynamics,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 054025 [1903.08063]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [34]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, M. Strickland, A. Vairo, P. Vander Griend and J.H. Weber, Bottomonium suppression in an open quantum system using the quantum trajectories method,JHEP05(2021) 136 [2012.01240]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [35]

    Akamatsu,Quarkonium in quark–gluon plasma: Open quantum system approaches re-examined,Prog

    Y. Akamatsu,Quarkonium in quark–gluon plasma: Open quantum system approaches re-examined,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.123(2022) 103932 [2009.10559]. – 29 –

    2022 arXiv

  24. [36]

    Yao and T

    X. Yao and T. Mehen,Quarkonium Semiclassical Transport in Quark-Gluon Plasma: Factorization and Quantum Correction,JHEP02(2021) 062 [2009.02408]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [37]

    Miura, Y

    T. Miura, Y. Akamatsu, M. Asakawa and Y. Kaida,Simulation of Lindblad equations for quarkonium in the quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 074001 [2205.15551]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [38]

    Binder, K

    T. Binder, K. Mukaida, B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld and X. Yao,Non-Abelian electric field correlator at NLO for dark matter relic abundance and quarkonium transport,JHEP01 (2022) 137 [2107.03945]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [39]

    Biondini, N

    S. Biondini, N. Brambilla, G. Qerimi and A. Vairo,Effective field theories for dark matter pairs in the early universe: cross sections and widths,JHEP07(2023) 006 [2304.00113]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [40]

    Eller, J

    A.M. Eller, J. Ghiglieri and G.D. Moore,Thermal Heavy Quark Self-Energy from Euclidean Correlators,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 094042 [1903.08064]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [41]

    Scheihing-Hitschfeld and X

    B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld and X. Yao,Real time quarkonium transport coefficients in open quantum systems from Euclidean QCD,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 054024 [2306.13127]. [42]TUMQCDcollaboration,Lattice study of correlators of chromoelectric fields for heavy quarkonium dynamics in t...

    2023 arXiv

  30. [43]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Laine and G.D. Moore,A Way to estimate the heavy quark thermalization rate from the lattice,JHEP04(2009) 053 [0901.1195]

    2009 arXiv

  31. [45]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, A. Islam, M. Strickland, A. Vairo and P. Vander Griend, Anatomy of quarkonium transport coefficients,in preparation,TUM-EFT 191/24, FERMILAB-PUB-24-0451-T. [46]TUMQCDcollaboration,Heavy quark diffusion coefficient with gradient flow,Phys. Rev. D 10...

    2023 arXiv

  32. [47]

    collinear

    A.I. Davydychev and Y. Schröder,Recursion-free solution for two-loop vacuum integrals with “collinear” masses,JHEP12(2022) 047 [2210.10593]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [48]

    Davydychev, P

    A.I. Davydychev, P. Navarrete and Y. Schröder,Factorizing two-loop vacuum sum-integrals, JHEP02(2024) 104 [2312.17367]

    2024

  34. [49]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana,FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements, Comput. Phys. Commun.256(2020) 107478 [2001.04407]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [50]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana,New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0,Comput. Phys. Commun.207(2016) 432 [1601.01167]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [51]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. Bohm and A. Denner,FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes,Comput. Phys. Commun.64(1991) 345

    1991

  37. [52]

    de la Cruz, A.M

    D. de la Cruz, A.M. Eller and G.D. Moore,QCD field-strength correlators on a Polyakov loop with gradient flow at next-to-leading order,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 094057 [2410.01578]. – 30 –

    2024 arXiv

  38. [53]

    Burnier, M

    Y. Burnier, M. Laine and M. Vepsalainen,Heavy quark medium polarization at next-to-leading order,JHEP02(2009) 008 [0812.2105]

    2009 arXiv

  39. [54]

    Narayanan and H

    R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger,Infinite N phase transitions in continuum Wilson loop operators,JHEP03(2006) 064 [hep-th/0601210]

    2006 arXiv

  40. [55]

    Lüscher,Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm,Commun

    M. Lüscher,Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm,Commun. Math. Phys.293(2010) 899 [0907.5491]

    2010 arXiv

  41. [56]

    Lüscher,Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD,JHEP08(2010) 071 [1006.4518]

    M. Lüscher,Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD,JHEP08(2010) 071 [1006.4518]

    2010 arXiv

  42. [57]

    Lüscher and P

    M. Lüscher and P. Weisz,Locality and exponential error reduction in numerical lattice gauge theory,JHEP09(2001) 010 [hep-lat/0108014]. – 31 –

    2001 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.