Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 38 references

Multi-shot readout error benchmark of the nitrogen-vacancy center's electronic qubit

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single number, $\Delta$, now benchmarks multi-shot readout error, and the paper proves a universal floor of $\sqrt{2/3} \approx 0.816$.

desk verdict A clean, correctly derived benchmark for the soft-average estimator, but the 'fundamental' bound is overstated — Δ bounds this estimator, not optimal multi-shot readout. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.17605 v1 pith:GNSH44LR submitted 2025-05-23 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Péter Boross , Domonkos Svastits , Győző Egri , András Pályi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords nitrogen-vacancycentermulti-shotreadouterrorbenchmarksoft-averageestimatorphotoncountingrate-equationmodelsignal-to-noiseratioquantumspinqubit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Multi-shot readout estimates a qubit's state populations from many repeated single-shot measurements rather than trying to identify each shot. This paper proposes a single-number benchmark, $\Delta$, for how fast that estimate improves with the number of shots $N$: the mean squared error falls as $\Delta^2/N$. For the nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center's electronic spin qubit read out by photoluminescence, the paper computes $\Delta$ from a rate-equation model of the optical cycle, including imperfect photon collection, background light, and initialization errors. The key results are a fundamental lower bound $\Delta \ge \sqrt{2/3} \approx 0.816$, realistic values far above it (for example $\Delta \approx 4.6$ at 10% detection efficiency), and a monotonic relation between $\Delta$ and the single-shot signal-to-noise ratio. That gives experimentalists a concrete metric for deciding how many shots to take and which hardware improvements matter most.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the soft-average estimator $\hat{z}(\bar n) = (\bar n - (\mu_0+\mu_1)/2)/((\mu_0-\mu_1)/2)$, a method-of-moments rule that converts the average photon count over $N$ shots into an estimate of the spin polarization $z$. The paper proves that its mean squared error is $(1/N)\,[4(A+Bz+Cz^2)/(\mu_0-\mu_1)^2]$, and the $z$-average of that expression yields $\Delta^2/N$ with $\Delta$ as above. For the NV specific calculation, the engine is a photon-number-resolved rate equation on the seven levels of the NV optical cycle, which produces the photon-number probability mass functions $P_0(n)$ and $P_1(n)$; those feed into the benchmark through their means and variances. Imperfect detection is handled by binomial thinning, background photons by Poisson addition, and initialization error by a statistical mixture, each contributing a separate term to $\Delta$.

What would settle it

Measure the single-shot photon-count histograms $P_0(n)$ and $P_1(n)$ on a real NV setup, insert their means and variances into Eq. (8), and compare the resulting $\Delta$ with the model's prediction at the same detection efficiency, background flux, and initialization error; if the experimental $\Delta$ disagrees beyond calibration uncertainty, or if the measured estimator error does not scale as $\Delta^2/N$, the model-derived benchmark is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the quality of multi-shot qubit readout can be compressed into one number, $\Delta = \sqrt{ 2(\sigma_0^2+\sigma_1^2)/(\mu_0-\mu_1)^2 + 2/3 }$, where $\mu_0,\mu_1$ and $\sigma_0^2,\sigma_1^2$ are the means and variances of the photon-count distributions $P_0(n)$ and $P_1(n)$ for the two basis states. Using the soft-average estimator $\hat{z}(\bar n) = (\bar n - (\mu_0+\mu_1)/2)/((\mu_0-\mu_1)/2)$, the mean squared error averaged over a uniform prior for the spin polarization $z$ is exactly $\mathrm{MSE}(N) = \Delta^2/N$. Since the first term under the square root is nonnegative, $\Delta \ge \sqrt{2/3} \approx 0.816$ for any readout of this type. For the NV electronic spin qubit at room temperature, the paper evaluates $\Delta$ with a seven-level rate-equation model of the photoluminescence cycle, and shows how $\Delta$ grows as photon detection efficiency drops, background photon flux rises, and initialization error increases; at $\eta=0.1$ with no background and perfect initialization the optimized value is $\Delta\approx4.6$, while even perfect collection leaves $\Delta\approx2.1$. It also derives $\Delta = \sqrt{2/\mathrm{SNR}^2 + 2/3}$, linking the benchmark directly to the familiar single-shot signal-to-noise ratio.

Load-bearing premise

The computed $\Delta$ values assume the seven-level rate-equation model, with transition rates taken from the literature, accurately represents the photoluminescence dynamics of the particular NV center being benchmarked.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • To reach a target error $\delta$ in estimating a Pauli expectation value, the required number of shots is $N = (\Delta/\delta)^2$; with the computed $\Delta \approx 4.6$ at 10% detection efficiency, a 1% error target needs about $2\times10^5$ shots.
  • Raising photon detection efficiency always lowers $\Delta$: at perfect collection the optimized benchmark is still $\Delta\approx2.1$, so collection efficiency alone cannot reach the $\sqrt{2/3}$ floor.
  • Background photons add $2\lambda t_m/(\mu_0-\mu_1)^2$ inside $\Delta$ and shift the optimal measurement time, so the best readout window depends on background conditions.
  • Initialization error $q$ contributes $4q(1-q)/(1-2q)^2$ to $\Delta$, independent of detection efficiency, which caps how close any device can get to the fundamental bound.
  • Because $\Delta$ decreases monotonically with the single-shot signal-to-noise ratio, optimizing SNR simultaneously minimizes $\Delta$, connecting single-shot and multi-shot figures of merit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: The same $\Delta$ construction applies to any qubit read out by photon counting, so measuring $\Delta$ on different platforms would give a direct shot-efficiency ranking independent of detector details.
  • Inference: The paper integrates photon counts over the whole readout window, discarding arrival-time information; a time-resolved estimator using the full photon-time series could lower $\Delta$ below the values reported here, and the benchmark formalism extends naturally to such data.
  • Inference: The $\sqrt{2/3}$ floor is derived for the soft-average estimator and a uniform prior on $z$; a different estimator or prior could in principle change the achievable bound, so the floor is a property of this estimation scheme rather than of all possible multi-shot readout strategies.
  • Inference: Since the paper's $\Delta$ values come from simulated photon statistics, a practical next step is a calibration protocol that measures $P_0(n)$ and $P_1(n)$ directly and inserts them into the benchmark formula, converting $\Delta$ into a device-specific experimental figure of merit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a multi-shot readout error benchmark Δ for qubit readout by photon counting. For a given pair of photon-number PMFs P0 and P1, Δ is defined through the mean squared error of a soft-average estimator that uses the empirical mean count, yielding MSE(N)=Δ²/N with Δ = sqrt(2(σ0²+σ1²)/(μ0-μ1)² + 2/3). The authors derive a lower bound Δ ≥ sqrt(2/3), which they call fundamental, and evaluate Δ for NV centers using a 7-level rate-equation model with literature rates, studying the effects of photon detection efficiency, background photons, and initialization error. They also relate Δ to the single-shot SNR.

Significance. The strength of the paper is the clean, self-contained derivation of the estimator's MSE and the use of a previously validated photoluminescence model, which gives concrete predictions for NV experiments. If adopted as a benchmark for the specific soft-average estimator, Δ is a simple and useful figure of merit. The main weakness is the overstatement of the lower bound as fundamental and of Δ as capturing the best possible multi-shot readout, which is not correct for optimal estimators.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. II, Eq. (8)-(9)] The claim that Δ ≥ sqrt(2/3) is a 'fundamental lower bound' and that 'the best multi-shot readout corresponds to Δ = sqrt(2/3)' is not supported by the derivation. Δ is defined for the method-of-moments estimator in Eq. (4), which uses only the empirical mean photon count. An optimal estimator that uses the full PMFs can achieve smaller MSE. For example, for P0=(0.8,0.1,0.1) and P1=(0.1,0.8,0.1) on n∈{0,1,2}, the outcome n=2 is uninformative because P0(2)=P1(2); the maximum-likelihood estimator discards those events and reaches an average MSE of ≈1.37/N, while Eq. (8) gives Δ²/N ≈ 3.16/N. Hence Δ is not an upper bound on the achievable multi-shot error, and the 'fundamental' bound is an artifact of the chosen estimator.
  2. [Sec. IV.B] The cross-platform comparison claim that Δ is 'readily generalizable' and 'can be considered as a cross-platform benchmark' needs qualification. Since Δ depends on the specific estimator, two devices with identical PMFs have the same Δ even if an optimal estimator achieves different errors on those PMFs; Δ can therefore mis-rank readout hardware when higher moments of the PMFs differ. The authors should state that Δ is a benchmark for the soft-average estimator family, not for the readout apparatus in general.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV.A] The word 'initalization' in the second paragraph should be 'initialization'.
  2. [Sec. III.A] The word 'photolouminescence' in the paragraph introducing the 7-level model should be 'photoluminescence'.
  3. [Sec. IV.B] The word 'adapatation' in the quantum simulation example should be 'adaptation'.
  4. [Sec. II] The sentence 'the multi-shot readout error error also shows 1/N dependence' contains a duplicated 'error'.
  5. [Sec. III.C] The phrase 'between between 0 and 200ns' contains a duplicated 'between'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Δ is an explicitly defined estimator coefficient computed from external model inputs, and the claimed lower bound is a direct algebraic consequence of that definition.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. The benchmark Δ is introduced in Eq. (8) as the coefficient of 1/N in the mean squared error of the explicitly defined soft-average estimator of Eq. (4), evaluated through Eqs. (5)–(7). The lower bound Δ ≥ sqrt(2/3) in Eq. (9) follows immediately from the non-negativity of the variance-dependent term in Eq. (8); no hidden input enters. The NV-specific photon-number distributions are obtained from a published 7-level rate-equation model (Ref. 25) using published transition rates (Ref. 23), i.e., external parameter inputs, not quantities fitted to the paper's own claims. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation. The skeptical concern that Δ is tailored to one particular estimator and therefore may not represent the true information-theoretic optimum for multi-shot readout is a question of interpretation and optimality, not circularity: the paper explicitly defines Δ for its chosen estimator and computes exactly that quantity. Thus the derivation chain is not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces no hidden physical entities. The central derivation is exact given the PMFs. The main assumptions are the fidelity of the rate-equation model, the uniform prior over z, the choice of the method-of-moments estimator, and perfect knowledge of the PMF parameters. The transition rates are taken from the literature and are the only numerically relevant free inputs.

free parameters (1)
  • Transition rates of the 7-level model = Γ_P=630 MHz, Γ_0=63 MHz, Γ_f0=12 MHz, Γ_f1=80 MHz, Γ_s1=2.4 MHz, Γ_s0=3.3 MHz
    Input parameters for the rate-equation model, taken from Ref. 25 and caption of Fig. 1. They are not fitted in this paper, but the computed numerical values of Δ depend directly on them.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The 7-level rate-equation model (Ref. 25) with the given transition rates accurately describes the room-temperature photoluminescence of the NV center.
    Used to compute P0(n) and P1(n), and hence Δ; no in-paper experimental validation.
  • domain assumption The N shots are independent and identically distributed with a fixed qubit state.
    Needed for the 1/N variance scaling of the sample mean in Eq. (A3).
  • ad hoc to paper The prior for the qubit parameter z is uniform on [-1,1].
    Defines the benchmark Δ; other priors would give different values of Δ.
  • ad hoc to paper The method-of-moments estimator in Eq. (4) is the basis for the benchmark.
    The paper does not claim optimality of this estimator; Δ is tied to this specific estimator.
  • domain assumption Background photons form a Poisson process independent of the NV signal, and photon detection is a Bernoulli thinning process.
    Standard assumptions used to derive Eqs. (15)-(17).
  • domain assumption The means and variances μ0, μ1, σ0², σ1² are known exactly.
    The estimator in Eq. (4) requires perfect calibration of these parameters; in practice calibration errors add to the readout error.
invented entities (1)
  • Multi-shot readout error benchmark Δ independent evidence
    purpose: Single-number figure of merit for the efficiency of multi-shot readout of a qubit, defined from photon-counting PMFs.
    Δ can be measured experimentally by estimating the PMFs P0(n) and P1(n), so it provides a falsifiable handle outside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-shot readout error benchmark of the nitrogen-vacancy center's electronic qubit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GNSH44LR

@misc{pith2026250517605,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-shot readout error benchmark of the nitrogen-vacancy center's electronic qubit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GNSH44LR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.17605}
}
abstract

The ground-state electronic spin of a negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond can be used for room-temperature experiments showing coherent qubit functionality. At room temperature, photoluminescence-based qubit readout has a low single-shot fidelity; however, the populations of the qubit's two basis states can be inferred using multi-shot readout. In this work, we calculate the dependence of the error of a multi-shot inference method on various parameters of the readout process. This multi-shot readout error scales as $\Delta/\sqrt{N}$, with $N$ being the number of shots, suggesting to use the coefficient $\Delta$ as a simple multi-shot readout error benchmark. Our calculation takes into account background photons, photon loss, and initialization error. Our model enables the identification of the readout error budget, i.e., the role various imperfections play in setting the readout error. Our results enable experimentalists and engineers to focus their efforts on those hardware improvements that yield the highest performance gain for multi-shot readout.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.17605 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Optical readout of the electronic qubit of a negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy center (NV). (a) Qubit readout is based on counting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Multi-shot readout error ∆ for an NV electronic qubit, affected by the photon detection efficiency and background photons. Uncertainty of the multi-shot estimate of the expectation value of the qubit’s σˆz varies with the number of shots N as ∆/ √ N. (a) Multi-shot readout error ∆ as function of photon detection efficiency η, optimized for the readout laser pulse duration. Blue: without background photons. Red: with… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Multi-shot readout error ∆ as a function of initialization error. Parameters: η = 0.1; see caption of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multi-shot readout error benchmark as a function of mea [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gruber , author A

    author author A. Gruber , author A. Dräbenstedt , author C. Tietz , author L. Fleury , author J. Wrachtrup , \ and\ author C. von Borczyskowski ,\ title title Scanning confocal optical microscopy and magnetic resonance on single defect centers , \ 10.1126/science.276.5321.2012 journal journal Science \ volume 276 ,\ pages 2012--2014 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    author author M. W. \ Doherty , author N. B. \ Manson , author P. Delaney , author F. Jelezko , author J. Wrachtrup , \ and\ author L. C. \ Hollenberg ,\ title title The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2013.02.001 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 528 ,\ pages 1--45 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.02.001

  3. [3]

    Jelezko , author T

    author author F. Jelezko , author T. Gaebel , author I. Popa , author A. Gruber , \ and\ author J. Wrachtrup ,\ title title Observation of coherent oscillations in a single electron spin , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.076401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 076401 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.076401

  4. [4]

    Hanson , author O

    author author R. Hanson , author O. Gywat , \ and\ author D. D. \ Awschalom ,\ title title Room-temperature manipulation and decoherence of a single spin in diamond , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.161203 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 74 ,\ pages 161203 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.161203

  5. [5]

    author author J. M. \ Taylor , author P. Cappellaro , author L. Childress , author L. Jiang , author D. Budker , author P. R. \ Hemmer , author A. Yacoby , author R. Walsworth , \ and\ author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ title title High-sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution , \ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 4 ,\ pages 810--816 ( ...

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Balasubramanian , author I

    author author G. Balasubramanian , author I. Y. \ Chan , author R. Kolesov , author M. Al-Hmoud , author J. Tisler , author C. Shin , author C. Kim , author A. Wojcik , author P. R. \ Hemmer , author A. Krueger , author T. Hanke , author A. Leitenstorfer , author R. Bratschitsch , author F. Jelezko , \ and\ author J. Wrachtrup ,\ title title Nanoscale ima...

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Dolde , author H

    author author F. Dolde , author H. Fedder , author M. W. \ Doherty , author T. N \"o bauer , author F. Rempp , author G. Balasubramanian , author T. Wolf , author F. Reinhard , author L. C. L. \ Hollenberg , author F. Jelezko , \ and\ author J. Wrachtrup ,\ title title Electric-field sensing using single diamond spins , \ @noop journal journal Nature Phys...

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Hong , author M

    author author S. Hong , author M. S. \ Grinolds , author L. M. \ Pham , author D. Le Sage , author L. Luan , author R. L. \ Walsworth , \ and\ author A. Yacoby ,\ title title Nanoscale magnetometry with NV centers in diamond , \ 10.1557/mrs.2013.23 journal journal MRS Bulletin \ volume 38 ,\ pages 155–161 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1557/mrs.2013.23

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    van der Sar , author Z

    author author T. van der Sar , author Z. H. \ Wang , author M. S. \ Blok , author H. Bernien , author T. H. \ Taminiau , author D. M. \ Toyli , author D. A. \ Lidar , author D. D. \ Awschalom , author R. Hanson , \ and\ author V. V. \ Dobrovitski ,\ title title Decoherence-pro...

    2012

  2. [10]

    author author T. H. \ Taminiau , author J. Cramer , author T. van der Sar , author V. V. \ Dobrovitski , \ and\ author R. Hanson ,\ title title Universal control and error correction in multi-qubit spin registers in diamond , \ 10.1038/nnano.2014.2 journal journal Nature Nanot...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Neumann , author R

    author author P. Neumann , author R. Kolesov , author B. Naydenov , author J. Beck , author F. Rempp , author M. Steiner , author V. Jacques , author G. Balasubramanian , author M. L. \ Markham , author D. J. \ Twitchen , author S. Pezzagna , author J. Meijer , author J. Twaml...

    2010

  4. [12]

    author author V. K. \ Sewani , author H. H. \ Vallabhapurapu , author Y. Yang , author H. R. \ Firgau , author C. Adambukulam , author B. C. \ Johnson , author J. J. \ Pla , \ and\ author A. Laucht ,\ title title Coherent control of NV −centers in diamond in a quantum teaching...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Yang , author H

    author author Y. Yang , author H. H. \ Vallabhapurapu , author V. K. \ Sewani , author M. Isarov , author H. R. \ Firgau , author C. Adambukulam , author B. C. \ Johnson , author J. J. \ Pla , \ and\ author A. Laucht ,\ title title Observing hyperfine interactions of NV −cente...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author D. A. \ Hopper , author H. J. \ Shulevitz , \ and\ author L. C. \ Bassett ,\ title title Spin readout techniques of the nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond , \ 10.3390/mi9090437 journal journal Micromachines \ volume 9 ( year 2018 ),\ 10.3390/mi9090437 NoStop

    doi

  7. [15]

    Kim , author A

    author author Y. Kim , author A. Eddins , author S. Anand , author K. X. \ Wei , author E. van den Berg , author S. Rosenblatt , author H. Nayfeh , author Y. Wu , author M. Zaletel , author K. Temme , \ and\ author A. Kandala ,\ title title Evidence for the utility of quantum ...

    2023

  8. [16]

    author author P. Shor ,\ title title Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring , \ in\ 10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700 booktitle Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science \ ( year 1994 )\ pp.\ pages 124--134 NoStop

    1994

  9. [17]

    Neumann , author J

    author author P. Neumann , author J. Beck , author M. Steiner , author F. Rempp , author H. Fedder , author P. R. \ Hemmer , author J. Wrachtrup , \ and\ author F. Jelezko ,\ title title Single-shot readout of a single nuclear spin , \ 10.1126/science.1189075 journal journal S...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Dr\'eau , author P

    author author A. Dr\'eau , author P. Spinicelli , author J. R. \ Maze , author J.-F. \ Roch , \ and\ author V. Jacques ,\ title title Single-shot readout of multiple nuclear spin qubits in diamond under ambient conditions , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.060502 journal journal Phys...

    doi

  11. [19]

    \ Liu , author J

    author author G.-Q. \ Liu , author J. Xing , author W.-L. \ Ma , author P. Wang , author C.-H. \ Li , author H. C. \ Po , author Y.-R. \ Zhang , author H. Fan , author R.-B. \ Liu , \ and\ author X.-Y. \ Pan ,\ title title Single-shot readout of a nuclear spin weakly coupled t...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Jaeger , author M

    author author T. Jaeger , author M. Kwon , author M. Keller , author R. Maier , author N. Bronn , author R. Finsterhoelzl , author G. Burkard , author L. Buettner , author R. Eberle , author D. Haehnel , author V. Vorobyov , \ and\ author J. Wrachtrup ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/...

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    author author C. A. \ Ryan , author B. R. \ Johnson , author J. M. \ Gambetta , author J. M. \ Chow , author M. P. \ da Silva , author O. E. \ Dial , \ and\ author T. A. \ Ohki ,\ title title Tomography via correlation of noisy measurement records , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.02211...

    doi

  14. [22]

    D'Anjou \ and\ author W

    author author B. D'Anjou \ and\ author W. A. \ Coish ,\ title title Soft decoding of a qubit readout apparatus , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.230402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 230402 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  15. [23]

    Robledo , author H

    author author L. Robledo , author H. Bernien , author T. v. d. \ Sar , \ and\ author R. Hanson ,\ title title Spin dynamics in the optical cycle of single nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/13/2/025013 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 13 ,...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Kay ,\ @noop title Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Volume I: Estimation theory \ ( publisher Pearson ,\ year 1993 ) NoStop

    author author S. Kay ,\ @noop title Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Volume I: Estimation theory \ ( publisher Pearson ,\ year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993

  17. [25]

    Panadero , author H

    author author I. Panadero , author H. Espin\'os , author L. Tsunaki , author K. Volkova , author A. Tobalina , author J. Casanova , author P. Acedo , author B. Naydenov , author R. Puebla , \ and\ author E. Torrontegui ,\ title title Photon-emission statistics for single nitro...

    doi

  18. [26]

    \ Tetienne , author L

    author author J.-P. \ Tetienne , author L. Rondin , author P. Spinicelli , author M. Chipaux , author T. Debuisschert , author J.-F. \ Roch , \ and\ author V. Jacques ,\ title title Magnetic-field-dependent photodynamics of single nv defects in diamond: an application to quali...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Lubotzky , author H

    author author B. Lubotzky , author H. Abudayyeh , author N. Nikolay , author O. Benson , \ and\ author R. Rapaport ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14761 title Approaching unity photon collection from nv centers via ultra-precise positioning of nanodiamonds in hybrid nanoantennas...

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    author author N. H. \ Wan , author B. J. \ Shields , author D. Kim , author S. Mouradian , author B. Lienhard , author M. Walsh , author H. Bakhru , author T. Schr \"o der , \ and\ author D. Englund ,\ title title Efficient extraction of light from a nitrogen-vacancy center in...

    2018

  21. [29]

    Neumann ,\ title title Towards a room temperature solid state quantum processor - the nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond , \ \ ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    author author P. Neumann ,\ title title Towards a room temperature solid state quantum processor - the nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond , \ \ ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  22. [30]

    Li , author E

    author author L. Li , author E. H. \ Chen , author J. Zheng , author S. L. \ Mouradian , author F. Dolde , author T. Schr \"o der , author S. Karaveli , author M. L. \ Markham , author D. J. \ Twitchen , \ and\ author D. Englund ,\ title title Efficient photon collection from ...

    2015

  23. [31]

    Song , author Y

    author author Y. Song , author Y. Tian , author Z. Hu , author F. Zhou , author T. Xing , author D. Lu , author B. Chen , author Y. Wang , author N. Xu , \ and\ author J. Du ,\ title title Pulse-width-induced polarization enhancement of optically pumped n-v electron spin in di...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Nakamura , author H

    author author Y. Nakamura , author H. Watanabe , author H. Sumiya , author K. M. \ Itoh , author K. Sasaki , author J. Ishi-Hayase , \ and\ author K. Kobayashi ,\ title title Optimization of optical spin readout of the nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond based on spin relaxatio...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Qian , author X

    author author P. Qian , author X. Lin , author F. Zhou , author R. Ye , author Y. Ji , author B. Chen , author G. Xie , \ and\ author N. Xu ,\ title title Machine-learning-assisted electron-spin readout of nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond , \ 10.1063/5.0038590 journal journa...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Gupta , author L

    author author A. Gupta , author L. Hacquebard , \ and\ author L. Childress ,\ title title Efficient signal processing for time-resolved fluorescence detection of nitrogen-vacancy spins in diamond , \ 10.1364/JOSAB.33.000B28 journal journal J. Opt. Soc. Am. B \ volume 33 ,\ pag...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Wirtitsch , author G

    author author D. Wirtitsch , author G. Wachter , author S. Reisenbauer , author M. Gulka , author V. Iv\'ady , author F. Jelezko , author A. Gali , author M. Nesladek , \ and\ author M. Trupke ,\ title title Exploiting ionization dynamics in the nitrogen vacancy center for rap...

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author B. J. \ Shields , author Q. P. \ Unterreithmeier , author N. P. \ de Leon , author H. Park , \ and\ author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ title title Efficient readout of a single spin state in diamond via spin-to-charge conversion , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.136402 journal jo...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Robledo , author L

    author author L. Robledo , author L. Childress , author H. Bernien , author B. Hensen , author P. F. A. \ Alkemade , \ and\ author R. Hanson ,\ title title High-fidelity projective read-out of a solid-state spin quantum register , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 477 ,\...

    2011

  30. [38]

    author author C. E. \ Bradley , author J. Randall , author M. H. \ Abobeih , author R. C. \ Berrevoets , author M. J. \ Degen , author M. A. \ Bakker , author M. Markham , author D. J. \ Twitchen , \ and\ author T. H. \ Taminiau ,\ title title A ten-qubit solid-state spin regi...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.