pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.18665 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.soft· physics.plasm-ph

Coupling an elastic string to an active bath: the emergence of inverse damping

Aaron Beyen , Christian Maes , Ji-Hui Pei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 13:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.softphysics.plasm-ph
keywords active bathrun-and-tumble particleselastic stringinverse dampingfrenetic frictionwave instabilityKlein-Gordon dynamicsnon-equilibrium friction
0
0 comments X

The pith

An active bath of run-and-tumble particles can induce negative friction on an elastic string, producing wave instability via a sign-changing frenetic term.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the effective dynamics of a slow elastic string governed by Klein-Gordon evolution when weakly coupled to a bath of persistent active particles. Friction on the string splits into an entropic piece that tracks noise variance in the usual way and a frenetic piece whose sign depends on bath persistence. At moderate to high persistence the frenetic piece turns negative and dominates, so the net friction coefficient becomes negative and drives exponential growth of waves, an effect analogous to inverse Landau damping. The anti-damping weakens and vanishes once particle propulsion speed becomes very large. Simulations reproduce the predicted initial growth.

Core claim

The induced friction coefficient is the sum of an entropic term, proportional to the noise variance, and a frenetic term that can be positive or negative. For sufficiently persistent run-and-tumble baths the frenetic term wins, the total friction becomes negative, and the string develops a wave instability akin to inverse Landau damping. The acceleration fades and eventually disappears at much higher propulsion speeds. Direct simulations confirm the initial growth driven by this anti-damping.

What carries the argument

The frenetic contribution to the friction coefficient, obtained exactly within the weak-coupling expansion of the induced Langevin-Klein-Gordon equation.

If this is right

  • Wave amplitudes on the string grow exponentially at early times because of the anti-damping.
  • The instability is absent both at low persistence and at extremely high propulsion speeds.
  • The effective equation supplies closed-form expressions for the streaming term, friction, and noise variance.
  • The same sign change in friction can appear in any system where persistent active particles couple to a deformable passive object.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism may operate in other active-matter settings where persistence competes with coupling strength, such as membranes or filaments in bacterial baths.
  • It supplies a route to spontaneous pattern formation or self-amplification without external energy input beyond the bath activity.
  • Testing the same coupling in two or three dimensions would show whether the instability produces extended structures or localized modes.

Load-bearing premise

The weak-coupling expansion remains valid and the run-and-tumble particles keep their persistence statistics while interacting with the string.

What would settle it

Observation of negative total friction or exponential growth of string displacement modes at intermediate persistence values, together with suppression of that growth at very high propulsion speeds, would confirm the result; failure to see either the growth or its suppression would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.18665 by Aaron Beyen, Christian Maes, Ji-Hui Pei.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: A configuration of active particles coupled to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Showing the dimensionless friction (20) as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Individual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Average of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Von Mises distribution for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Average of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Individual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Individual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Average of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Standard deviation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider a slow elastic string with Klein-Gordon dynamics coupled to a bath of run-and-tumble particles. We derive and solve the induced Langevin-Klein-Gordon string dynamics with explicit expressions for the streaming term, friction coefficient, and noise variance. These parameters are computed exactly in a weak coupling expansion. The induced friction is a sum of two terms: one entropic, proportional to the noise variance as in the Einstein relation for a thermal equilibrium bath, and a frenetic contribution that can take both signs. The frenetic part wins for higher bath persistence, making the total friction negative, and hence creating a wave instability akin to inverse Landau damping. However, this acceleration decreases and eventually disappears when the propulsion speed of the active particles becomes much higher. Detailed simulations confirm the initial growth driven by this anti-damping.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript considers a slow elastic string with Klein-Gordon dynamics coupled to a bath of run-and-tumble particles. It derives the induced effective Langevin-Klein-Gordon dynamics for the string via a weak-coupling expansion, providing explicit expressions for the streaming term, the friction coefficient (split into entropic and frenetic contributions), and the noise variance. The central result is that the frenetic term can dominate and render the total friction negative at higher bath persistence, producing a linear wave instability analogous to inverse Landau damping; the effect weakens at very high propulsion speeds. Detailed simulations are reported to confirm the initial growth phase driven by this anti-damping.

Significance. If the result holds, the work identifies a concrete mechanism by which frenetic contributions from an active bath can induce negative damping and instabilities in a passive elastic medium, extending inverse-damping concepts to active-matter settings. Potential relevance includes biological filaments or soft active materials. Explicit parameter-free expressions obtained from the bath properties in weak coupling and the simulation confirmation of initial growth constitute clear strengths.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of the induced Langevin-Klein-Gordon dynamics (weak-coupling expansion)] The weak-coupling expansion used to obtain the friction coefficient (entropic plus frenetic) assumes small string displacements so that the run-and-tumble persistence statistics of the bath particles remain unperturbed. Once the total friction is negative, however, the linear modes grow exponentially; the resulting large excursions necessarily increase the effective coupling strength, taking the system outside the regime in which the sign change was computed. No self-consistency estimate or time-scale analysis is provided to show that the instability remains inside the perturbative window.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Effective dynamics and friction decomposition] The distinction between the entropic and frenetic contributions to friction would benefit from an explicit side-by-side comparison (e.g., a dedicated equation or short subsection) that isolates their microscopic origins.
  2. [Numerical simulations] In the simulation section, quantitative details on how the initial growth rate is extracted (fitting window, number of realizations, system size) would improve reproducibility and allow direct comparison with the analytic prediction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment and for highlighting an important point regarding the regime of validity of our weak-coupling analysis. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The weak-coupling expansion used to obtain the friction coefficient (entropic plus frenetic) assumes small string displacements so that the run-and-tumble persistence statistics of the bath particles remain unperturbed. Once the total friction is negative, however, the linear modes grow exponentially; the resulting large excursions necessarily increase the effective coupling strength, taking the system outside the regime in which the sign change was computed. No self-consistency estimate or time-scale analysis is provided to show that the instability remains inside the perturbative window.

    Authors: We agree that the derivation of the effective Langevin-Klein-Gordon dynamics, including the sign change in the total friction, is performed under the assumption of small displacements that leave the bath persistence statistics unperturbed. The negative friction coefficient signals a linear instability whose initial exponential growth occurs while amplitudes remain small. Our simulations are designed to capture precisely this initial growth phase before nonlinear saturation sets in. To address the referee's concern, we will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript that provides a time-scale estimate: the growth rate is fixed by the magnitude of the negative friction, and the duration of the linear regime scales as (1/|γ|) log(1/ε) where ε is the initial fluctuation amplitude set by the noise strength. For sufficiently weak coupling this window remains inside the perturbative regime, furnishing the requested self-consistency check. We will also note that the instability is reported only as the onset of wave growth, not as a description of the fully developed nonlinear state. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is self-contained via weak-coupling expansion

full rationale

The paper derives the effective Langevin-Klein-Gordon dynamics and explicit expressions for streaming term, friction coefficient, and noise variance exactly in a weak-coupling expansion from the run-and-tumble bath properties. The entropic and frenetic friction contributions are outputs of that expansion rather than inputs or fits to the instability. Negative total friction for higher persistence is a computed result, not a definitional or fitted premise. No self-citation chains, ansatz smuggling, or reductions by construction are present; simulations provide separate confirmation. The derivation does not reduce to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation relies on the applicability of a weak-coupling expansion and on the standard statistical properties of run-and-tumble particles; no new entities are introduced and no free parameters are fitted to the instability itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Weak coupling expansion is valid for the string-bath interaction.
    The abstract states that streaming term, friction, and noise are computed exactly in a weak coupling expansion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5678 in / 1335 out tokens · 61587 ms · 2026-05-19T13:07:23.080297+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 113 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Decomposing the friction From the SM [81], we learn the stationary distribution ρϕ in the weak coupling limit to linear order in ζϕ. That yields the friction coefficient (13), which can be decom- posed as ν = (βeffB + γ) Y + O(ζ3 ϕ) (16) γ(r, u,[ϕ]) = −k2 µ v0 NX i,j Z ∞ 0 dτ · (17) G(r − zi(t + τ)) ; sj ∂zj G(u − zj(t)) BO ϕ with βeff = 2αµ/v2

    work page

  2. [2]

    The friction in (16) can thus be de- composed as a term proportional to the noise covariance νeq = βeffBY – representing the standard fluctuation- dissipation relation of the second kind (FDRII) at ef- fective temperature βeff – and an additional active con- tribution νactive = γY that vanishes in the passive limit, v0 → ∞, v 2 0/α → 2µkBT , when we effec...

    work page

  3. [3]

    square-root

    Working per mode The time-dependent transition probabilities can be com- puted perturbatively; see SM [81], yielding the friction ν, (16), the noise coefficient B, (14), and γ from (17), all to order ζ2 ϕ. They can be represented with a Fourier co- sine series, e.g. ν(r, u) = ν0 +2P∞ n=1 νn cos 2πn L (r − u) with coefficients, for n ̸= 0, γn = − k2 N µ|Gn...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Toner, Y

    J. Toner, Y. Tu, and S. Ramaswamy. Hydrodynamics and phases of flocks. Ann. Phys., 318(1):170–244, 2005. Special Issue

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Ramaswamy

    S. Ramaswamy. The Mechanics and Statistics of Active Matter. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. , 1(Volume 1, 2010):323–345, 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    te Vrugt and R

    M. te Vrugt and R. Wittkowski. Metareview: a survey of active matter reviews. Eur. Phys. J. E , 48(2):12, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Gompper, R

    G. Gompper, R. G. Winkler, T. Speck, A. Solon, C. Nar- dini, F. Peruani, H. L¨ owen, R. Golestanian, U. B. Kaupp, and L. Alvarez. The 2020 motile active mat- ter roadmap. J. Condens. Matter Phys. , 32(19):193001,

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Topical Review, Open Access

    work page

  9. [9]

    Fodor and M

    ´E. Fodor and M. C. Marchetti. The statistical physics of active matter: From self-catalytic colloids to living cells. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. , 504:106–120, 2018. Lecture Notes of the 14th International Summer School on Fundamental Problems in Statistical Physics

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe. Active particles in complex and crowded environments.Rev. Mod. Phys., 88:045006, 2016

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Ramaswamy

    S. Ramaswamy. Active matter. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp., 2017(5):054002, 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    A. Dhar, A. Kundu, S. N. Majumdar, S. Sabhapan- dit, and G. Schehr. Run-and-tumble particle in one- dimensional confining potentials: Steady-state, relax- ation, and first-passage properties. Phys. Rev. E , 99:032132, 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    R. Brown. XXVII. A brief account of microscopical ob- servations made in the months of June, July and August 1827, on the particles contained in the pollen of plants; and on the general existence of active molecules in or- ganic and inorganic bodies. Phil. Mag., 4(21):161–173, 1828

    work page

  14. [14]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. ¨Uber die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der W¨ arme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhen- den Fl¨ ussigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Ann. Phys , 322(8):549–560, 1905

    work page 1905

  15. [15]

    Prost and R

    J. Prost and R. Bruinsma. Shape fluctuations of active membranes. Europhys. Lett., 33(4):321–326, 1996

    work page 1996

  16. [16]

    Manneville, P

    J.-B. Manneville, P. Bassereau, S. Ramaswamy, and J. Prost. Active membrane fluctuations studied by micropipet aspiration. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 64(2):021908, 2001

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    Ramaswamy, J

    S. Ramaswamy, J. Toner, and J. Prost. Nonequilibrium fluctuations, traveling waves, and instabilities in active membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84(16):3494, 2000

    work page 2000

  18. [18]

    L.-C. Lin, N. Gov, and F. L. H. Brown. Nonequilib- rium membrane fluctuations driven by active proteins. J. Chem. Phys. , 124(7):074903, 2006

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Loubet, U

    B. Loubet, U. Seifert, and M. A. Lomholt. Effective tension and fluctuations in active membranes. Phys. Rev. E, 85(3):031913, 2012. 8

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Lacoste and P

    D. Lacoste and P. Bassereau. An update on active mem- branes. In P. Lesieur, C. Dufourc, and D. L. Mayer, ed- itors, Liposomes, Lipid Bilayers and Model Membranes: From Basic Research to Application , pages 271–287. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2014

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Turlier and T

    H. Turlier and T. Betz. Unveiling the active nature of living-membrane fluctuations and mechanics. Annu. Rev. of Condens. Matter Phys. , 10(1):213–232, 2019

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Nikola, A

    N. Nikola, A. P. Solon, Yariv Kafri, M. Kardar, J. Tailleur, and R. Voituriez. Active Particles with Soft and Curved Walls: Equation of State, Ratchets, and Instabilities. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:098001, Aug 2016

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    S. A. Mallory, C. Valeriani, and A. Cacciuto. Anoma- lous dynamics of an elastic membrane in an active fluid. Phys. Rev. E , 92(1), July 2015

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Maitra, P

    A. Maitra, P. Srivastava, M. Rao, and S. Ramaswamy. Activating membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 112:258101, Jun 2014

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Kaiser and H

    A. Kaiser and H. L¨ owen. Unusual swelling of a polymer in a bacterial bath. J. Chem. Phys. , 141(4):044903, 07 2014

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Li, B.-k

    H.-s. Li, B.-k. Zhang, J. Li, W.-d. Tian, and K. Chen. Brush in the bath of active particles: Anomalous stretching of chains and distribution of particles. J. Chem. Phys., 143(22), December 2015

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Harder, C

    J. Harder, C. Valeriani, and A. Cacciuto. Activity- induced collapse and reexpansion of rigid polymers. Phys. Rev. E , 90:062312, Dec 2014

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Vandebroek and C

    H. Vandebroek and C. Vanderzande. Dynamics of a polymer in an active and viscoelastic bath. Phys. Rev. E, 92(6), December 2015

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    J. Shin, A. G. Cherstvy, W. K. Kim, and R. Metzler. Facilitation of polymer looping and giant polymer dif- fusivity in crowded solutions of active particles. New J. Phys., 17(11):113008, October 2015

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Kaiser, S

    A. Kaiser, S. Babel, B. ten Hagen, C. von Ferber, and H. L¨ owen. How does a flexible chain of active particles swell? J. Chem. Phys. , 142(12), March 2015

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Kikuchi, A

    N. Kikuchi, A. Ehrlicher, D. Koch, J. A. K¨ as, S. Ra- maswamy, and M. Rao. Buckling, stiffening, and neg- ative dissipation in the dynamics of a biopolymer in an active medium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 106(47):19776–19779, 2009. Epub 2009 Nov 9

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    S. F. Edwards and D. R. Wilkinson. The surface statis- tics of a granular aggregate. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. , 381(1780):17–31, 1982

    work page 1982

  33. [33]

    A. P. Misra and G. Brodin. Wave-particle interactions in quantum plasmas. Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. , 6(1), 2022

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Kulsrud and W

    R. Kulsrud and W. P. Pearce. The Effect of Wave- Particle Interactions on the Propagation of Cosmic Rays. Astrophys. J., 156:445, 1969

    work page 1969

  35. [35]

    B. T. Tsurutani and G. S. Lakhina. Some basic con- cepts of wave-particle interactions in collisionless plas- mas. Rev. Geophys., 35(4):491–501, 1997

    work page 1997

  36. [36]

    L. I. Rudakov and V. N. Tsytovich. The theory of plasma turbulence for strong wave-particle interaction. Plasma Phys., 13(3):213, 1971

    work page 1971

  37. [37]

    Proti` ere, A

    S. Proti` ere, A. Boudaoud, and Y. Couder. Parti- cle–wave association on a fluid interface.J. Fluid Mech., 554:85–108, 2006

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    Løland Bore, M

    S. Løland Bore, M. Schindler, K.-D. Nguyen Thu Lam, E. Bertin, and O. Dauchot. Coupling spin to velocity: collective motion of Hamiltonian polar particles.J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp., 2016(3):033305, mar 2016

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    Casiulis, M

    M. Casiulis, M. Tarzia, L. F. Cugliandolo, and O. Dau- chot. Velocity and Speed Correlations in Hamiltonian Flocks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:198001, May 2020

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Casiulis, E

    M. Casiulis, E. Arbel, C. van Waes, Y. Lahini, S. Mar- tiniani, N. Oppenheimer, and M. Y. B. Zion. A geomet- ric condition for robot-swarm cohesion and cluster-flock transition, 2025. arXiv:2409.04618 [cond-mat.soft]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Junot, G

    G. Junot, G. Briand, R. Ledesma-Alonso, and O. Dau- chot. Active versus Passive Hard Disks against a Mem- brane: Mechanical Pressure and Instability. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:028002, Jul 2017

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    G. Wang, T. V. Phan, S. Li, M. Wombacher, J. Qu, Y. Peng, G. Chen, D. I. Goldman, S. A. Levin, R. H. Austin, and L. Liu. Emergent Field-Driven Robot Swarm States. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126:108002, Mar 2021

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    T. V. Phan, G. Wang, L. Liu, and R. H. Austin. Boot- strapped Motion of an Agent on an Adaptive Resource Landscape. Symmetry, 13(2), 2021

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    C. Maes. Response Theory: A Trajectory-Based Ap- proach. Front. Phys., 8, 2020

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Baiesi, C

    M. Baiesi, C. Maes, and B. Wynants. Nonequilib- rium Linear Response for Markov Dynamics, I: Jump Processes and Overdamped Diffusions. J. Stat. Phys. , 137(5):1094–1116, 2009

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    Baiesi, C

    M. Baiesi, C. Maes, and B. Wynants. Fluctuations and Response of Nonequilibrium States. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 103:010602, 2009

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Baiesi and C

    M. Baiesi and C. Maes. An update on the nonequilib- rium linear response. New J. Phys., 15(1):013004, 2013

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Pei and C

    J.-H. Pei and C. Maes. Induced friction on a probe moving in a nonequilibrium medium. Phys. Rev. E. , 111(3), 2025

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    C. Maes. Fluctuating Motion in an Active Environment. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:208001, 2020

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Nakajima

    S. Nakajima. On Quantum Theory of Transport Phenomena: Steady Diffusion. Prog. Theor. Phys. , 20(6):948–959, 1958

    work page 1958

  51. [51]

    Itami and S.-i

    M. Itami and S.-i. Sasa. Universal Form of Stochastic Evolution for Slow Variables in Equilibrium Systems. J. Stat. Phys., 167(1):46–63, 2017

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Harada and S.-i

    T. Harada and S.-i. Sasa. Energy dissipation and vi- olation of the fluctuation-response relation in nonequi- librium Langevin systems. Phys. Rev. E , 73(2):026131, 2006

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    C. Maes. On the Second Fluctuation–Dissipation Theorem for Nonequilibrium Baths. J. Stat. Phys. , 154(3):705–722, 2014

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Maes and S

    C. Maes and S. Steffenoni. Friction and Noise for a Probe in a Nonequilibrium Fluid. Phys. Rev. E , 91(2):022128, 2015

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Maes and S

    C. Maes and S. R. Thomas. From Langevin to general- ized Langevin equations for the nonequilibrium Rouse model. Phys. Rev. E , 87(2):022145, 2013

    work page 2013

  56. [56]

    Natali, L

    L. Natali, L. Caprini, and F. Cecconi. How a local active force modifies the structural properties of polymers.Soft Matter, 16(10):2594–2604, 2020

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Sakaue, T

    T. Sakaue, T. Saito, and H. Wada. Dragging a polymer in a viscous fluid: Steady state and transient. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. , 86(1):011804, 2012

    work page 2012

  58. [59]

    Granek, Y

    O. Granek, Y. Kafri, and J. Tailleur. Anomalous Trans- port of Tracers in Active Baths. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 129:038001, 2022

    work page 2022

  59. [60]

    R. Zwanzig. Ensemble Method in the Theory of Irre- versibility. J. Chem. Phys. , 33(5):1338–1341, 1960

    work page 1960

  60. [61]

    R. Zwanzig. Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics. Ox- ford University Press, 2001

    work page 2001

  61. [62]

    Mori-Zwanzig Equations With Time-Dependent Liouvillian

    L.-S. Bouchard. Mori-Zwanzig Equations With Time-Dependent Liouvillian, 2007. arXiv:0709.1358 [physics.chem-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  62. [63]

    G. A. van Lear and G. E. Uhlenbeck. The Brownian Mo- tion of Strings and Elastic Rods. Phys. Rev., 38:1583– 1598, 1931

    work page 1931

  63. [64]

    Kulkarni

    Y. Kulkarni. Fluctuations of active membranes with nonlinear curvature elasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 173:105240, 2023

    work page 2023

  64. [65]

    M. E. Cates. Active Field Theories. In Active Mat- ter and Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 112, September 2018. Oxford University Press, 2022

    work page 2018

  65. [66]

    Markovich, ´E

    T. Markovich, ´E. Fodor, E. Tjhung, and M. E. Cates. Thermodynamics of Active Field Theories: En- ergetic Cost of Coupling to Reservoirs. Phys. Rev. X , 11:021057, 2021

    work page 2021

  66. [67]

    te Vrugt, J

    M. te Vrugt, J. Bickmann, and R. Wittkowski. How to derive a predictive active field theory: a step-by-step tutorial, 2022. arXiv:2212.00078 [cond-mat.soft]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [68]

    A. Kamenev. Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2011

    work page 2011

  68. [69]

    Zinn-Justin

    J. Zinn-Justin. Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena. International series of monographs on physics. Oxford University Press, 2021

    work page 2021

  69. [70]

    L. D. Landau. On the vibrations of the electronic plasma. J. Phys. (USSR) , 10:25–34, 1946

    work page 1946

  70. [71]

    F.F. Chen. Introduction to Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion, Volume 1: Plasma Physics . Introduction to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. Springer, 2nd edition, 1984

    work page 1984

  71. [72]

    Tonks and I

    L. Tonks and I. Langmuir. Oscillations in Ionized Gases. Phys. Rev., 33:195–210, 1929

    work page 1929

  72. [73]

    Bormashenko and I.Legchenkova

    E. Bormashenko and I.Legchenkova. Negative Effec- tive Mass in Plasmonic Systems. Materials, 13(8):1890, 2020

    work page 2020

  73. [74]

    Bormashenko, I

    E. Bormashenko, I. Legchenkova, and M. Frenkel. Nega- tive Effective Mass in Plasmonic Systems II: Elucidating the Optical and Acoustical Branches of Vibrations and the Possibility of Anti-Resonance Propagation. Materi- als, 13(16):3512, 2020

    work page 2020

  74. [75]

    T. Gilet. Quantum-like statistics of deterministic wave- particle interactions in a circular cavity. Phys. Rev. E , 93:042202, 2016

    work page 2016

  75. [76]

    T. Gilet. Dynamics and statistics of wave-particle inter- actions in a confined geometry.Phys. Rev. E, 90:052917, 2014

    work page 2014

  76. [77]

    J. D. Jackson. Classical electrodynamics. Wiley, New York, NY, 3rd edition, 1999

    work page 1999

  77. [78]

    Pei and C

    J.-H. Pei and C. Maes. Transfer of active motion from medium to probe via the induced friction and noise,

    work page

  78. [79]

    arXiv:2504.03210 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv

  79. [80]

    Landau, E.M

    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshits, A.M. Kosevich, and L.P. Pitaevskii. Theory of Elasticity: Volume 7 . Course of theoretical physics. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1986

    work page 1986

  80. [81]

    Gravel and C

    P. Gravel and C. Gauthier. Classical applications of the Klein-Gordon equation. Am. J. Phys. , 79:447–453, 2011

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.