Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Ginsparg-Wilson Hamiltonians with Improved Chiral Symmetry

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper builds a family of lattice Hamiltonians whose conserved chiral charge becomes exactly quantized only as a parameter $k$ tends to infinity, at the cost of nonlocality; the chiral anomaly then forces the infinite-volume limit.

desk verdict A useful Hamiltonian extension of the overlap construction; the key identity is unproved but true and easily supplied, so it deserves review with minor revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20419 v1 pith:YCU5EYVN submitted 2025-05-26 hep-lat cond-mat.str-elhep-th

Hersh Singh This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-latcond-mat.str-elhep-th PACS 11.15.Ha11.30.Rd
keywords Ginsparg-WilsonrelationoverlapHamiltonianchiralsymmetrylatticefermionsanomalydomain-walllocalityregularization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs a family of order-$k$ overlap Hamiltonians for lattice Dirac fermions whose modified chiral charge $\hat\gamma_5$ is exactly conserved for every integer $k\ge0$ but is not quantized. Increasing $k$ pushes low-energy modes toward $|\hat\gamma_5|=1$ and high-energy modes toward $\hat\gamma_5=0$, so chiral charge quantization improves systematically, becoming exact in the $k\to\infty$ limit at the price of nonlocality. The construction is based on Fujikawa's higher-order generalization of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation and reproduces the chiral anomaly only when large-volume and large-$k$ limits are taken together. The family matters because Hamiltonian formulations with tunable chiral symmetry are what quantum and tensor-network simulations need, and it makes explicit a locality-versus-chirality trade-off that is otherwise hidden.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $k$-overlap Hamiltonian $h=\bigl(h^{(2k+1)}\bigr)^{1/(2k+1)}$ built from the higher-order Wilson-type operator $D_W^{(2k+1)}=i(\hat/\delta)^{2k+1}-(r\Delta/2)^{2k+1}-m^{2k+1}$ and the unitary $V_{2k+1}=\varepsilon(D_W^{(2k+1)})$, with $h^{(2k+1)}=\gamma_0(1+V_{2k+1})/2$ and normalization $2m^{2k+1}=1$. The argument is carried by the generalized Ginsparg-Wilson identity $\hat\gamma_5^2+h^{4k+2}=1$, which links each single-particle energy $h$ to a modified chirality $\hat\gamma_5$; this is what turns Fujikawa's algebraic relation into a quantitative trade-off between charge quantization (large $k$) and locality (finite $k$, exponentially local with decay length $\xi_k\sim k$).

What would settle it

Compute the single-particle spectrum of the $k$-overlap Hamiltonian in $2+1$ dimensions for several values of $k$ on a finite lattice and test whether $\hat\gamma_5^2+h^{4k+2}=1$ holds to numerical precision; a discrepancy beyond roundoff would falsify the central identity, and with it the quantitative claims about improved chiral symmetry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that replacing the standard Ginsparg-Wilson relation $D+D^\dagger=2D^\dagger D$ in the Creutz-Horvath-Neuberger overlap Hamiltonian with Fujikawa's order-$k$ relation $D+D^\dagger=2(D^\dagger D)^{k+1}$ yields a tower of $k$-overlap Hamiltonians with exactly conserved nonquantized chiral charges $\hat\gamma_5=\gamma_5-(\gamma_5D)^{2k+1}$, and these satisfy the single-particle identity $\hat\gamma_5^2+h^{4k+2}=1$. That identity forces the joint $(\hat\gamma_5,h)$ spectrum onto a curve that becomes rectangular as $k$ grows, so that finite-energy modes acquire definite chirality $\pm1$ and cutoff modes lose chirality. In the $k\to\infty$ limit the Hamiltonian and chiral charge are exactly quantized but nonlocal, and the continuum chiral anomaly is reproduced only in the simultaneous large-volume, large-$k$ limit; the paper argues this non-commutation of limits is inevitable given the locality-chirality no-go constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The whole improvement story rests on the identity $\hat\gamma_5^2+h^{4k+2}=1$, which the paper states without proof and checks numerically only in one spatial dimension; if it fails for some $k$ or in higher dimensions, the claimed improved quantization collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every finite $k$, the $k$-overlap Hamiltonian has an exactly conserved but unquantized chiral charge, and the quantization sharpens as $k$ increases.
  • In the $k\to\infty$ limit the chiral charge is exactly quantized, but the Hamiltonian and charge operator become nonlocal, so locality and exact chirality cannot be had simultaneously.
  • The chiral anomaly is reproduced only in a simultaneous $k,L\to\infty$ limit with fixed ratio; the quantization limit and the thermodynamic limit do not commute.
  • The unquantized modes with $\hat\gamma_5\approx0$ are identified with the bulk modes of a domain-wall construction and are required for anomaly inflow; they cannot be decoupled unless all anomalies cancel.
  • The construction is explicit and prescriptive: each $k$-overlap Hamiltonian is obtained by taking an odd root of a higher-order overlap operator, enabling direct implementation in quantum and tensor-network simulations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test the paper does not perform is to couple the $k$-overlap Hamiltonians to dynamical gauge fields and check whether improved chiral symmetry changes how fast gauge-anomaly observables converge to their continuum values; the present analysis uses only background gauge fields.
  • The linear growth $\xi_k\approx1.6k$ suggests a practical resource trade-off: for a fixed lattice size there is an optimal $k$ balancing charge quantization against the volume needed to reproduce the anomaly, an optimization the paper leaves implicit.
  • If Eq. (8) holds in all dimensions, the same construction should yield improved chiral symmetry for Hamiltonian formulations of $3+1$-dimensional fermions, with the same locality-quantization trade-off; the paper demonstrates the mechanism numerically only in $d=1$.
  • In the domain-wall picture, the displacement of edge modes plays the role of $\hat\gamma_5$, which connects the construction to direct experimental probes in cold-atom or photonic simulators of one-dimensional topological matter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a family of order-k overlap Hamiltonians for lattice Dirac fermions in odd spatial dimensions, generalizing the standard Ginsparg-Wilson Hamiltonian via Fujikawa's higher-order Ginsparg-Wilson relations. For each integer k ≥ 0, a modified chiral charge operator is defined which is exactly conserved but not quantized for finite k, and becomes quantized in the k → ∞ limit at the cost of locality. The paper presents numerical spectra in 1+1 dimensions, a background-field computation of the chiral anomaly, and an interpretation of the results in terms of domain-wall fermions and a locality-versus-quantization trade-off.

Significance. If the central algebraic identity and the claimed properties of the construction are correct, the paper offers a tunable family of Hamiltonian lattice regularizations with improved chiral symmetry, which could be useful for quantum and tensor-network simulations. The explicit construction, the numerical evidence in 1+1d, and the connection to domain-wall fermions are valuable contributions. However, several load-bearing statements are asserted without proof, in particular Eq. (8), and the k → ∞ limit is presented heuristically. The manuscript is therefore significant but incomplete in its current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. (7)-(8)] The identity \hat\gamma_5^2 + h^{4k+2} = 1 is stated as "Interestingly, we find" without a derivation. This identity underlies all quantitative claims about improved chiral quantization, the k → ∞ limit, and the finite-size scaling of the anomaly. Please provide a proof, for example by showing that for n = 2k+1 the operator h^n constructed in Appendix A is the standard (k=0) overlap Hamiltonian, that the \hat\gamma_5 defined in Eq. (7) coincides with the standard modified chiral charge for that overlap, and that consequently Eq. (5) applied to h^n yields Eq. (8). In addition, the manuscript should prove that the h defined in Eq. (10) satisfies the order-k Fujikawa-Ginsparg-Wilson relation (6) and that [\hat\gamma_5, h] = 0, rather than asserting these properties without proof.
  2. [Section II, "The k → ∞ limit", Eqs. (11)-(12)] The limiting forms (h)_∞ and (\hat\gamma_5)_∞ are presented for d = 1 as if they were derived, but the text only cites numerical spectra. A rigorous or at least more explicit derivation is needed, including the sense in which the k → ∞ limit is taken (pointwise in momentum? uniform? this matters because the operators become nonlocal). The claim that the nonlocality arises from a discontinuity of the second derivative at |p| = π/2 should be substantiated with the actual limiting expressions and their regularity properties.
  3. [Section III, Eq. (15) and Fig. 3(c)] The finite-size scaling C(A,L) = 1 + O(e^{-L/ξ_k}) with ξ_k ≈ 1.6k is reported as a numerical finding, and it is used to quantify the locality-chirality trade-off. Since this scaling is load-bearing for the paper's central message, please provide at least a heuristic derivation connecting ξ_k to the locality estimate in Eq. (13), or clearly separate the numerical observation from analytical expectations. As written, the relation between the exponential decay length of the charge operator and the coefficient 1.6 is not explained.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption refers to the "standard (k=1) overlap" while the legend and the main text use k=0 for the standard case. Please correct this inconsistency.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A2)] The definition of the (2k+1)th root using sign(λ)|λ|^{1/n} should be stated more explicitly as a choice of branch, and it should be checked that the resulting h is Hermitian and that h^n equals the intended operator h^{(2k+1)}.
  3. [Appendix A, first paragraph] The sentence "the nth power of the order-n Hamiltonian overlap h^{(n)} ≡ h^n satisfies the standard gw relation" is confusing. Please clarify that h^{(n)} as defined in Eq. (A1) is the standard overlap operator and that h is its nth root, so that h^n = h^{(n)}.
  4. [Section III, "Chiral anomaly"] The gauge-field coupling is implemented by the replacement h(p) → h(p+A), which is standard for onsite U(1) symmetries, but for a nonlocal Hamiltonian this substitution should be justified. Please state the assumptions under which this minimal coupling is valid for the k-overlap Hamiltonians.
  5. [Section III, no-go argument] The claim that a quantized chiral charge commuting with the Hamiltonian cannot reproduce Eq. (14) is presented in a single sentence. Expanding the argument would make it more convincing: a quantized commuting charge would force ⟨Q5⟩ to be piecewise constant in A at finite volume, contradicting the continuous linear dependence expected from Eq. (14).
  6. [General] For reproducibility, consider releasing the code or data used to generate Figs. 1-3, since the numerical results are an important part of the evidence for the locality-quantization trade-off.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular step in the derivation; the only flagged issue is an unproven but load-bearing identity (Eq. 8), which is a rigor gap, not a reduction to inputs.

full rationale

The construction is explicit and self-contained rather than circular. The k-overlap Hamiltonian is defined by an nth-root prescription from h^(2k+1), and the modified chiral charge is defined as \hat\gamma_5 = \gamma_5 - (\gamma_5 D)^{2k+1}; the key relation Eq. (8), \hat\gamma_5^2 + h^{4k+2} = 1, is an algebraic consequence of the Fujikawa relation and these definitions, not a quantity fitted to any data. The only parameter besides k is m, fixed analytically by 2m^{2k+1}=1, and the numerical benchmarks in Figs. 1 and 3 are checked against the continuum anomaly prediction of Eq. (14) with no free parameters. The single self-citation [28] appears only in a contextual list regarding locality, unitarity, and compactness of the U(1) chiral symmetry; it is not load-bearing, because the construction rests on Fujikawa [39,40] and Creutz-Horvath-Neuberger [33] rather than on the author's prior work. The real caveat is rigor, not circularity: Eq. (8) is introduced with 'Interestingly, we find' and is not derived in the paper, and it is verified numerically only in d = 1, even though all quantitative improvement claims depend on it. This is an omitted proof, and adding an explicit derivation would remove the gap; the claim is not an input renamed as a prediction, so the circularity score remains low.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The k-overlap Hamiltonians and modified chiral charges are new operators, but they are constructed from standard Wilson-Dirac operators. The main assumptions are the validity of the prior Euclidean higher-order GW construction, the well-definedness of the operators used, and the method of coupling background gauge fields to nonlocal Hamiltonians.

free parameters (2)
  • mass parameter m = 2^{-1/(2k+1)}
    Chosen by hand to set the normalization of the low-energy limit (Section II, below Eq. (10)). Not fitted to data.
  • Wilson parameter r = 1
    Set to 1 for all numerical computations. For n=1 this is the standard Wilson parameter. Not a fitted constant.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The higher-order Ginsparg-Wilson relation D + D† = 2(D†D)^{k+1} admits overlap-like solutions in the Euclidean theory that reproduce the anomaly.
    Invoked in Section II to motivate the Hamiltonian construction; cited to Fujikawa and Fujikawa-Ishibashi [41,42]. If this prior result were false, the Hamiltonian analogue would not be a valid regularization.
  • standard math The matrix sign function ε(X) and the (2k+1)-th root of the Hermitian operator h^(2k+1) are well-defined and preserve the needed hermiticity and locality properties.
    Used in Eq. (10) and Appendix A to define the k-overlap Hamiltonian. The root is defined via eigenstates with sign(λ)|λ|^{1/n}.
  • domain assumption The background U(1) gauge field can be coupled by shifting the momentum argument of the single-particle Hamiltonian, h(p + A).
    Used in Section III to compute the anomaly. This is standard for constant background fields on a torus but assumes the validity of the Peierls substitution for nonlocal Hamiltonians.
  • domain assumption Locality of the modified chiral charge is exponential with decay length proportional to k, as expressed by (γ5 D)^{2k+1} ~ e^{-|x-y|/k}.
    Quoted from Fujikawa and Ishibashi [43,44] in Section II. It is used to argue the trade-off between locality and quantization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ginsparg-Wilson Hamiltonians with Improved Chiral Symmetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YCU5EYVN

@misc{pith2026250520419,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ginsparg-Wilson Hamiltonians with Improved Chiral Symmetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YCU5EYVN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20419}
}
abstract

We construct a family of Ginsparg-Wilson Hamiltonians with improved chiral properties, starting from a construction of Creutz-Horvath-Neuberger that provides a doubler-free Hamiltonian lattice regularization for Dirac fermions in even spacetime dimensions. We use a higher-order generalization of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation due to Fujikawa, which yields an order-$k$ Hamiltonian overlap operator for each integer $k \geq 0$, with an exactly conserved but nonquantized chiral charge that becomes quantized as $k \to \infty$. Our construction provides physical insight into how Fujikawa's higher-order Ginsparg-Wilson relation improves chiral symmetry while reproducing the anomaly, highlighting the trade-offs inherent in any Hamiltonian lattice realization of an anomalous chiral symmetry. This class of Hamiltonian lattice regularizations, with their tunable chiral symmetry properties, offers potential advantages for quantum and tensor-network simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.20419 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Behavior of order- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Spectrum of the domain-wall Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Anomaly inflow and finite-size effects for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bosonization versus the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    The 2D modified Villain model's Weyl operators reproduce free Dirac correlations in the continuum, and their no-doubler Dirac kernel is non-local, showing exactly how bosonization evades the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem.

  2. Exact chiral symmetry with quantum signal processing

    hep-lat 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    QSP implements the overlap fermion Hamiltonian with Ginsparg-Wilson violation O(ε_e) at cost only a log(1/ε_e)/κ factor above Wilson-Dirac, trading qubits for gates versus domain-wall fermions.

  3. Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics for Quantum Simulations

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A representation-basis Hamiltonian framework with staggered and Wilson quarks is used to simulate SU(3) lattice QCD on up to 32 qubits, displaying theta-angle, hadronic, and string-breaking dynamics in 3D under strong...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    D. B. Kaplan, Chiral Symmetry and Lattice Fermions, in Les Houches Summer School: Session 93: Modern perspec- tives in lattice QCD: Quantum field theory and high per- formance computing (2009) pp. 223–272, arXiv:0912.2560 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, No Go Theorem for Regularizing Chiral Fermions, Phys. Lett. B 105, 219 (1981)

    work page 1981

  3. [3]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 2. Intuitive Topological Proof, Nucl. Phys. B 193, 173 (1981)

    1981

  4. [4]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 1. Proof by Homotopy Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 185, 20 (1981), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 195, 541 (1982)]

    1981

  5. [5]

    P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2649 (1982)

    work page 1982

  6. [6]

    D. B. Kaplan, A Method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 288, 342 (1992), arXiv:hep- lat/9206013

    arXiv 1992

  7. [7]

    Neuberger, Exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys

    H. Neuberger, Exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 417, 141 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9707022

    arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Neuberger, More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys

    H. Neuberger, More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 427, 353 (1998), arXiv:hep- lat/9801031

    arXiv 1998

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Hasenfratz, Prospects for perfect actions, Nucl

    P. Hasenfratz, Prospects for perfect actions, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 63, 53 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9709110

    1998 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Luscher, Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, Phys

    M. Luscher, Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, Phys. Lett. B 428, 342 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9802011

    1998 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Luscher, Abelian chiral gauge theories on the lattice with exact gauge invariance, Nucl

    M. Luscher, Abelian chiral gauge theories on the lattice with exact gauge invariance, Nucl. Phys. B 549, 295 (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9811032

    1999 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Kikukawa, Domain wall fermion and chiral gauge theo- ries on the lattice with exact gauge invariance, Phys

    Y. Kikukawa, Domain wall fermion and chiral gauge theo- ries on the lattice with exact gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. D 65, 074504 (2002), arXiv:hep-lat/0105032

    2002 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Luscher, Lattice regularization of chiral gauge theo- ries to all orders of perturbation theory, JHEP 06, 028, arXiv:hep-lat/0006014

    M. Luscher, Lattice regularization of chiral gauge theo- ries to all orders of perturbation theory, JHEP 06, 028, arXiv:hep-lat/0006014

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, and N. Kan, A lattice regulariza- tion of Weyl fermions in a gravitational background, PoS LA TTICE2023, 371 (2024), arXiv:2401.05636 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, and N. Kan, A Lattice Formulation of Weyl Fermions on a Single Curved Surface, PTEP 2024, 043B05 (2024), arXiv:2402.09774 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Berkowitz, A

    E. Berkowitz, A. Cherman, and T. Jacobson, Exact lattice chiral symmetry in 2D gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, 014510 (2024), arXiv:2310.17539 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Catterall, Chiral lattice fermions from staggered fields, Phys

    S. Catterall, Chiral lattice fermions from staggered fields, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014503 (2021), arXiv:2010.02290 [hep- lat]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Catterall, Lattice regularization of reduced K¨ ahler- Dirac fermions and connections to chiral fermions, SciPost Phys

    S. Catterall, Lattice regularization of reduced K¨ ahler- Dirac fermions and connections to chiral fermions, SciPost Phys. 16, 108 (2024), arXiv:2311.02487 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    D. B. Kaplan, Chiral Gauge Theory at the Boundary between Topological Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 141603 (2024), arXiv:2312.01494 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    D. B. Kaplan and S. Sen, Weyl Fermions on a Fi- nite Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 141604 (2024), arXiv:2312.04012 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    J. W. Pedersen and Y. Kikukawa, Reformulation of anomaly inflow on the lattice and construction of lattice chiral gauge theories, PoS LA TTICE2022, 381 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Wang and X.-G

    J. Wang and X.-G. Wen, Nonperturbative regularization of (1+1)-dimensional anomaly-free chiral fermions and bosons: On the equivalence of anomaly matching con- ditions and boundary gapping rules, Phys. Rev. B 107, 014311 (2023), arXiv:1307.7480 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Wang and X.-G

    J. Wang and X.-G. Wen, A Solution to the 1+1D Gauged Chiral Fermion Problem, Phys. Rev. D 99, 111501 (2018), arXiv:1807.05998 [hep-lat]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Wang and Y.-Z

    J. Wang and Y.-Z. You, Symmetric Mass Generation, Sym- metry 14, 1475 (2022), arXiv:2204.14271 [cond-mat.str- el]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    M. Zeng, Z. Zhu, J. Wang, and Y.-Z. You, Symmetric Mass Generation in the 1+1 Dimensional Chiral Fermion 3-4-5-0 Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 185301 (2022), arXiv:2202.12355 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Conserved currents in five- dimensional proposals for lattice chiral gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114519 (2024), arXiv:2404.16372 [hep- lat]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Propagator Zeros and Lattice Chiral Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 081903 (2024), arXiv:2311.12790 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Clancy, D

    M. Clancy, D. B. Kaplan, and H. Singh, Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 014502 (2024), arXiv:2309.08542 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Clancy, Toward a Ginsparg-Wilson lattice Hamilto- nian, Phys

    M. Clancy, Toward a Ginsparg-Wilson lattice Hamilto- nian, Phys. Rev. D110, L011502 (2024), arXiv:2312.08647 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    N. Kan, S. Aoki, and H. Fukaya, Lattice Weyl Fermion on a Single Spherical Domain-Wall, PoS LA TTICE2024, 379 (2025), arXiv:2502.03045 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Horvath and H

    I. Horvath and H. B. Thacker, Ginsparg-Wilson relation and spin chains, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.73, 682 (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9809108

    1999 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Cheluvaraja and N

    S. Cheluvaraja and N. D. Hari Dass, Axial anomaly and Ginsparg-Wilson fermions in the lattice Dirac sea picture, Nucl. Phys. B 598, 134 (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0001016

    2001 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Creutz, I

    M. Creutz, I. Horvath, and H. Neuberger, A New fermion Hamiltonian for lattice gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 106, 760 (2002), arXiv:hep-lat/0110009

    2002 arXiv

  26. [34]

    J. E. Mandula, Symmetries of Ginsparg-Wilson Chi- ral Fermions, Phys. Rev. D 80, 085023 (2009), arXiv:0901.0572 [hep-lat]

    2009 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Intersections of QIS and Theoretical Particle Physics

    (and earlier works [ 31, 52]) pointed out that there is, in fact, a quantized charge for the 1 + 1-dimensional staggered fermion. (Ref. [ 37] used a Wilson formulation for the quantized chiral charge.) It avoids our no-go argument since the quantized chiral charge does not com...

  28. [36]

    Chatterjee, S

    A. Chatterjee, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao, Quantized Ax- ial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chiral Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 021601 (2025), arXiv:2409.12220 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Gioia and R

    L. Gioia and R. Thorngren, Exact Chiral Symme- tries of 3+1D Hamiltonian Lattice Fermions, (2025), arXiv:2503.07708 [cond-mat.str-el]. 8

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Yamaoka, Quantized Axial Charge in the Hamiltonian Approach to Wilson Fermions, (2025), arXiv:2504.10263 [hep-lat]

    T. Yamaoka, Quantized Axial Charge in the Hamiltonian Approach to Wilson Fermions, (2025), arXiv:2504.10263 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Fidkowski and C

    L. Fidkowski and C. Xu, A No-Go Result for Im- plementing Chiral Symmetries by Locality-Preserving Unitaries in a Three-Dimensional Hamiltonian Lattice Model of Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 196601 (2023), arXiv:2306.10105 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Fujikawa, Algebraic generalization of the Ginsparg- Wilson relation, Nucl

    K. Fujikawa, Algebraic generalization of the Ginsparg- Wilson relation, Nucl. Phys. B 589, 487 (2000), arXiv:hep- lat/0004012

    2000

  33. [41]

    Fujikawa, Aspects of anomalies in field theory, Int

    K. Fujikawa, Aspects of anomalies in field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 331 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0007084

    2001 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Fujikawa and M

    K. Fujikawa and M. Ishibashi, Chiral anomaly for a new class of lattice Dirac operators, Nucl. Phys. B 587, 419 (2000), arXiv:hep-lat/0005003

    2000 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Fujikawa, Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson algebra and index theorem on the lattice, Int

    K. Fujikawa, Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson algebra and index theorem on the lattice, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 16, 1931 (2002), arXiv:hep-lat/0205024

    2002 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Fujikawa and M

    K. Fujikawa and M. Ishibashi, Locality properties of a new class of lattice Dirac operators, Nucl. Phys. B 605, 365 (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0102012

    2001 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Fujikawa and M

    K. Fujikawa and M. Ishibashi, Properties of a new class of lattice Dirac operators, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 106, 712 (2002), arXiv:hep-lat/0110023

    2002 arXiv

  38. [46]

    S. D. Drell, M. Weinstein, and S. Yankielowicz, Strong Coupling Field Theories. 2. Fermions and Gauge Fields on a Lattice, Phys. Rev. D 14, 1627 (1976)

    1976

  39. [47]

    Stacey, Eliminating Lattice Doubles, Phys

    R. Stacey, Eliminating Lattice Doubles, Phys. Rev. D 26, 468 (1982)

    1982

  40. [48]

    Haegeman, L

    J. Haegeman, L. Lootens, Q. Mortier, A. Stottmeister, A. Ueda, and F. Verstraete, Interacting chiral fermions on the lattice with matrix product operator norms, (2024), arXiv:2405.10285 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Narayanan and H

    R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, Chiral determinant as an overlap of two vacua, Nucl. Phys. B 412, 574 (1994), arXiv:hep-lat/9307006

    1994 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Kikukawa and T

    Y. Kikukawa and T. Noguchi, Low-energy effective action of domain wall fermion and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 83, 630 (2000), arXiv:hep- lat/9902022

    2000

  43. [51]

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and J. A. Harvey, Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls, Nucl. Phys. B 250, 427 (1985)

    1985

  44. [52]

    Creutz and I

    M. Creutz and I. Horvath, Surface states and chiral sym- metry on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 50, 2297 (1994), arXiv:hep-lat/9402013

    1994 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Horvath, Ginsparg-Wilson relation and ultralocality, Phys

    I. Horvath, Ginsparg-Wilson relation and ultralocality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4063 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9808002

    1998 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Stacey, Spectrum doubling and double-valuedness, Journal of Mathematical Physics 26, 3172 (1985)

    R. Stacey, Spectrum doubling and double-valuedness, Journal of Mathematical Physics 26, 3172 (1985)

    1985

  47. [55]

    Chiu, Can nonlocal Dirac operators be topologi- cally proper?, Phys

    T.-W. Chiu, Can nonlocal Dirac operators be topologi- cally proper?, Phys. Lett. B 498, 111 (2001), arXiv:hep- lat/0008010

    2001

  48. [56]

    Chiu, Ginsparg-Wilson relation with R=(a(gamma(5))D)**2k, Nucl

    T.-W. Chiu, Ginsparg-Wilson relation with R=(a(gamma(5))D)**2k, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 94, 733 (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0010070. Appendix A: Explicit construction of higher-order overlap Hamiltonians Explicit construction of the k-overlap Hamiltonians can be given in analogy ...

    2001 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.