Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 37 references

Spotlight-TTS: Spotlighting the Style via Voiced-Aware Style Extraction and Style Direction Adjustment for Expressive Text-to-Speech

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spotlight-TTS claims that style in speech is concentrated in voiced frames, and that rotating the extracted style away from content makes expressive TTS both more expressive and more natural.

desk verdict Decent incremental TTS style-transfer paper with real full-system gains, but the ablation table never isolates the named voiced-extraction mechanism, so the causal story is softer than the conclusions claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20868 v2 pith:A26EHG2Z submitted 2025-05-27 cs.SD cs.AIeess.AS

Nam-Gyu Kim , Deok-Hyeon Cho , Seung-Bin Kim , Seong-Whan Lee This is my paper
classification cs.SDcs.AIeess.AS
keywords expressivetext-to-speechstyletransferembeddingvectorquantizationvoiced/unvoicedregionsrotationtrickdisentanglementemotionalspeechsynthesis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that previous style-transfer TTS models fail because they treat all frames of the reference spectrogram as equally style-bearing. It proposes to quantize only voiced frames through a residual vector-quantization codebook, fill unvoiced positions with learned mask codes that are refined by a biased self-attention module, and adjust the direction of the resulting style vector to be orthogonal to content while staying close to prosody. On the ESD emotional speech benchmark, the model reports the best scores on every subjective and objective metric among the compared style-transfer systems, including a naturalness MOS of 4.26 versus 3.98 for the best baseline. If correct, this shows that region-aware style extraction plus explicit direction control is a workable route to expressive TTS without paired style labels.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a voiced-aware style encoder built on residual vector quantization with a rotation trick. Voiced frames, identified by pre-extracted voiced/unvoiced flags, are the only frames fed to the RVQ codebook; unvoiced positions receive learnable mask codes that an unvoiced filler module, made of ConvNeXt blocks and biased self-attention, fills using information from the voiced context. The rotation trick replaces the straight-through estimator by computing $\tilde{q} = \operatorname{sg}[\|q\|/\|e\| R]\,e$, which preserves the angle between the gradient and codebook vector and improves gradient flow. Style direction adjustment adds two losses: the disentanglement loss $\mathcal{L}_{sd} = \| \operatorname{sg}[E_c] E_s^T \|_F^2$ and the preserving loss $\mathcal{L}_{sp} = -\sum_i \cos\text{sim}(p_i, \tilde{s}_i)$, the first making style orthogonal to content and the second anchoring it to prosody.

What would settle it

Replace the voiced/unvoiced split with a random split of the same proportion, keeping everything else identical: if the random split matches Spotlight-TTS's reported metrics on pitch error and style similarity, then the voiced-region hypothesis is not doing the work.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated in the paper's own terms, is that a style encoder gains expressiveness by concentrating its codebook on voiced frames and by actively shaping the style vector's direction in embedding space. The voiced-aware extraction aggregates voiced frames only, applies the rotation trick during residual vector quantization so gradients preserve the angle between input and codebook vector, and lets an unvoiced filler module synthesize plausible unvoiced frames from voiced context through biased self-attention. The style direction adjustment then applies a disentanglement loss that pushes the style vector to be orthogonal to the content embedding, and a preserving loss that pulls it toward low-frequency prosody embeddings. With these mechanisms, Spotlight-TTS reports the highest naturalness, style similarity, and prosody accuracy, and the lowest word error rate, among all baselines in the comparison.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes voiced frames carry most of the style-relevant acoustic information, so that discarding unvoiced frames during quantization improves style extraction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Concentrating quantization on voiced frames lowers pitch error and improves style similarity relative to quantizing all frames equally.
  • Making the style vector orthogonal to content reduces word error rate, indicating less content leakage during transfer.
  • The unvoiced filler with biased self-attention preserves prosodic continuity and voiced/unvoiced classification, so unvoiced frames still matter for the final signal.
  • The relative gains hold in both parallel and non-parallel style-transfer preference tests, with the gap over baselines larger in the parallel setting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to apply the same voiced-region masking to whispered or breathy speech, where unvoiced and mixed regions carry much of the expressive content; if the method degrades there, the voiced-region hypothesis is dataset-dependent.
  • The rotation trick's role suggests that any straight-through-estimator codebook could benefit from angle-preserving gradients; this may transfer to other discretized representation-learning problems such as image or video tokenization.
  • One direct check of the paper's core assumption would be to measure how much style information each region type actually contains, for example by training a classifier to identify emotion from voiced-only versus unvoiced-only frames; the paper itself reports only ablation evidence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Spotlight-TTS, an expressive text-to-speech model that modifies the style encoder of a FastSpeech2-based system in two ways: voiced-aware style extraction and style direction adjustment. Voiced-aware style extraction aggregates only voiced frames for residual vector quantization, uses the rotation trick for gradient flow, and fills unvoiced positions with learnable mask codes refined by an unvoiced-filler module with biased self-attention. Style direction adjustment adds a style-disentanglement loss that encourages orthogonality between style and content embeddings and a style-preserving loss that aligns style with low-band prosody embeddings. The method is evaluated on the ESD dataset against four style-transfer baselines using subjective MOS, AXY preference, UTMOS, WER, pitch and periodicity errors, V/UV F1, and SECS. The paper reports consistent gains across these metrics and ablation studies intended to show that each proposed component contributes.

Significance. If the reported results hold, the paper offers a practical and comparatively simple set of modifications that improve expressive TTS quality and style transfer. The strengths of the submission include public audio samples, evaluation with multiple objective and subjective metrics, external pretrained tools for UTMOS, WER, and SECS, and ablation experiments for most components. The style-direction-adjustment losses, particularly the combination of orthogonality-based disentanglement with prosody preservation, are a reasonable contribution. However, the evidence for the central attribution to voiced-aware extraction is weaker than the presentation suggests, and several statistical details need clarification before the claims can be fully assessed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.5.1, Table 3] The ablation chain does not isolate the voiced-extraction (VE) component. The rows are full model, –RT, –RT–UF, and –RT–UF–VE, so the marginal effect of removing VE is measured only when both the rotation trick and the unvoiced filler are already removed. Because RT changes gradient flow through the quantization step and UF restores continuity over the frames that VE discards, the degradation from –RT–UF to –RT–UF–VE need not transfer to the full model. Please add an “Ours – VE” ablation that keeps RT and UF intact, and ideally one-factor ablations for RT and UF as well.
  2. [§2.1 and §3.5.1] The central mechanism rests on the hypothesis stated in §2.1 that voiced regions carry more style-relevant information than unvoiced regions, but no experiment measures this region importance directly. A direct comparison of style transfer from voiced-only versus unvoiced-only reference segments, or an analysis of codebook utilization across regions, would provide evidence for the assumption. As it stands, the only support for the assumption is the confounded ablation chain noted above.
  3. [§3.3, Tables 1 and 3] Objective metrics are reported without error bars or significance tests, and some key subjective differences are small relative to the reported confidence intervals. For example, in Table 3 the nMOS of “Ours” is 3.93±0.07 versus 3.91±0.06 for “–RT”, and the same “Ours” condition appears as 3.93 in Table 3 but 3.95 in Table 4. Please clarify whether these are two separate listening runs or the same run, and add variance estimates or significance tests for the central comparisons.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] The text contains typos such as “V oiced-aware” in the abstract and “V oiced regions” in §2.1; these should read “Voiced-aware” and “Voiced regions”.
  2. [§2.1.2, Eq. (2)] The biased self-attention formula uses an elementwise multiplication with the attention-reweighting coefficient β, but the text does not specify whether β is applied to rows or columns of the attention matrix. Please state the orientation and the exact shapes involved.
  3. [§2.1.1 and §3.2] The method uses “pre-extracted voiced and unvoiced (V/UV) flags”, but the source of these flags is not described. Please state whether they are ground-truth labels from the dataset or predicted by an external tool, since V/UV errors directly affect the voiced-extraction and unvoiced-filler modules.
  4. [§3.4, reference selection] The sentence “For reference audio selection, we used same strategy as in [11]” is too vague for reproduction. Please specify the sampling procedure for reference utterances in both parallel and non-parallel settings.
  5. [Table 2] The AXY preference results lack experimental detail such as the number of participants, the number of trials per condition, and any significance testing. Please report these details.
  6. [§3.1] The RVQ acronym is used in Table 1 and elsewhere before being defined; the text should define “residual vector quantization” at first mention in the introduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Spotlight-TTS's components are trained end-to-end and evaluated on held-out test sets; no derivation reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

Spotlight-TTS is an empirical TTS system rather than a formal derivation. Its proposed components (voiced extraction, unvoiced filler, rotation trick, style disentanglement loss, style preserving loss) are defined constructively in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 and optimized end-to-end through the total loss in Eq. (5). None of these objectives contains the target evaluation metric as a fitted parameter, and no result is claimed by construction. The voiced-priority assumption in Section 2.1 is stated as a hypothesis and is empirically probed through ablations; even if the ablations do not fully isolate the voiced extraction component in the full model, that is an experimental attribution gap, not circular reasoning. The pretrained global style encoder is taken from GenerSpeech (external work, not the authors' own), and objective metrics rely on external predictors (UTMOS, Whisper, WavLM) and a separately trained BigVGAN vocoder. The authors' self-citations ([2]-[6]) provide background on prior TTS work but are not load-bearing for the central claim. No uniqueness theorem, imported ansatz, or renamed fitted quantity is invoked. Therefore the paper does not exhibit circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on several hand-chosen hyperparameters (loss weights, attention reweighting coefficient, low-band Mel cutoff) and four domain assumptions about speech structure that are plausible but not independently verified.

free parameters (6)
  • lambda_rvq = 1.0
    Hand-chosen loss weight for the RVQ objective in Eq. (5); not derived.
  • lambda_adv = 0.05
    Hand-chosen adversarial loss weight in Eq. (5).
  • lambda_sd = 0.02
    Hand-chosen style disentanglement loss weight in Eq. (5).
  • lambda_sp = 0.02
    Hand-chosen style preserving loss weight in Eq. (5).
  • beta (AR coefficient) = 0.02 for mask positions, 1 for non-masked
    Hand-chosen attention reweighting coefficient in Eq. (2) for the biased self-attention in the unvoiced filler module.
  • Low-band Mel threshold = 20 bins out of 80
    Hand-chosen cutoff for prosody embeddings in SP loss, Section 3.2.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Voiced regions carry more style information than unvoiced regions
    Stated in Section 2.1 as a hypothesis; motivates voiced extraction and unvoiced filler. If false, the method's core mechanism loses its rationale.
  • domain assumption Style and content are linearly separable via orthogonality in the embedding space
    SD loss in Eq. (3) forces orthogonality between style and content embeddings; assumes this removes content without destroying style.
  • domain assumption Prosody is well represented by the lower 20 Mel bins of the reference spectrogram
    SP loss in Eq. (4) aligns style with low-frequency prosody embeddings; this assumes the selected band captures prosodic information.
  • domain assumption Pre-extracted V/UV flags are reliable
    All voiced-aware processing depends on V/UV flags extracted from reference speech; errors propagate to style extraction.
  • standard math Rotation trick preserves gradient quality for RVQ
    Eq. (1) is taken from Fifty et al. [19]; the paper relies on the cited result that RT improves gradient flow.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spotlight-TTS: Spotlighting the Style via Voiced-Aware Style Extraction and Style Direction Adjustment for Expressive Text-to-Speech." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A26EHG2Z

@misc{pith2026250520868,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spotlight-TTS: Spotlighting the Style via Voiced-Aware Style Extraction and Style Direction Adjustment for Expressive Text-to-Speech},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A26EHG2Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20868}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in expressive text-to-speech (TTS) have introduced diverse methods based on style embedding extracted from reference speech. However, synthesizing high-quality expressive speech remains challenging. We propose Spotlight-TTS, which exclusively emphasizes style via voiced-aware style extraction and style direction adjustment. Voiced-aware style extraction focuses on voiced regions highly related to style while maintaining continuity across different speech regions to improve expressiveness. We adjust the direction of the extracted style for optimal integration into the TTS model, which improves speech quality. Experimental results demonstrate that Spotlight-TTS achieves superior performance compared to baseline models in terms of expressiveness, overall speech quality, and style transfer capability. Our audio samples are publicly available.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.20868 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) shows the overall architecture of our proposed Spotlight-TTS. Ec, Eg, and Es denote the content embedding, global style embedding, and style embedding respectively. (b) shows the details of the style encoder. e and q represent the input feature of the quantization layer and quantized vector respectively. (c) shows the conceptual illustration of angles of vectors changed by style direction adjustment. Lsd and Lsp… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    With recent advancements in deep learning technology [2, 3, 4], the naturalness of synthesized speech has improved significantly [5, 6]

    Introduction Text-to-speech (TTS) [1] aims to synthesize speech from input text. With recent advancements in deep learning technology [2, 3, 4], the naturalness of synthesized speech has improved significantly [5, 6]. Despite the development of general TTS systems, synthesizing human-like speech for applications such as virtual assistants and audiobooks r...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Spotlight-TTS: Spotlighting the Style via Voiced-Aware Style Extraction and Style Direction Adjustment for Expressive Text-to-Speech

    Spotlight-TTS In this section, we introduce our proposed model Spotlight- TTS. As shown in Figure 1, we focus on effectively ex- tracting style by considering the importance of different Mel- spectrogram regions while adjusting the direction of style. Our proposed method consists of two parts: voiced-aware style ex- traction and style direction adjustment...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Both are about the same distance

    Experiments and results 3.1. Experimental setup We use the emotional speech dataset (ESD) [25] to verify whether the models can capture style using expressive refer- ence speech. It contains ten English speakers, each produc- ing 350 sentences in five emotions (happy, sad, neutral, sur- prise, and angry). We follow the original partitioning criteria of th...

    work page

  4. [4]

    V oiced-aware style extraction considers the acoustic character- istics of different speech regions, enabling more detailed style extraction

    Conclusion We presented Spotlight-TTS, a framework for synthesizing ex- pressive speech by focusing on voiced regions in the Mel- spectrogram and adjusting the direction of the extracted style. V oiced-aware style extraction considers the acoustic character- istics of different speech regions, enabling more detailed style extraction. Furthermore, the styl...

    work page

  5. [5]

    RS-2019-II190079), Artificial Intelligence Innova- tion Hub (No

    Acknowledgements This work was partly supported by the Institute of Informa- tion & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (Ar- tificial Intelligence Graduate School Program (Korea Univer- sity) (No. RS-2019-II190079), Artificial Intelligence Innova- tion Hub (No. RS-2021-II212068), AI Technology...

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Emosphere-tts: Emotional style and intensity modeling via spherical emotion vector for controllable emotional text-to- speech,

    D.-H. Cho, H.-S. Oh, S.-B. Kim, S.-H. Lee, and S.-W. Lee, “Emosphere-tts: Emotional style and intensity modeling via spherical emotion vector for controllable emotional text-to- speech,” in Interspeech 2024, 2024, pp. 1810–1814

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Fastspeech 2: Fast and high-quality end-to-end text to speech,

    Y . Ren, C. Hu, X. Tan, T. Qin, S. Zhao, Z. Zhao, and T.-Y . Liu, “Fastspeech 2: Fast and high-quality end-to-end text to speech,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  8. [8]

    A new recurrent neural-network ar- chitecture for visual pattern recognition,

    S.-W. Lee and H.-H. Song, “A new recurrent neural-network ar- chitecture for visual pattern recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 331–340, 1997

    work page 1997

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Multiresolution recognition of hand- written numerals with wavelet transform and multilayer cluster neural network,

    S.-W. Lee and Y .-J. Kim, “Multiresolution recognition of hand- written numerals with wavelet transform and multilayer cluster neural network,” in Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , vol. 2, 1995, pp. 1010– 1013 vol.2

    1995

  2. [10]

    Multilayer cluster neural network for totally un- constrained handwritten numeral recognition,

    S.-W. Lee, “Multilayer cluster neural network for totally un- constrained handwritten numeral recognition,” Neural Networks, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 783–792, 1995

    1995

  3. [11]

    Hierspeech: Bridging the gap between text and speech by hierarchical variational inference using self-supervised represen- tations for speech synthesis,

    S.-H. Lee, S.-B. Kim, J.-H. Lee, E. Song, M.-J. Hwang, and S.-W. Lee, “Hierspeech: Bridging the gap between text and speech by hierarchical variational inference using self-supervised represen- tations for speech synthesis,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems...

    2022

  4. [12]

    Neural dis- crete representation learning,

    A. van den Oord, O. Vinyals, and k. kavukcuoglu, “Neural dis- crete representation learning,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Towards end-to-end prosody transfer for expressive speech synthesis with tacotron,

    R. Skerry-Ryan, E. Battenberg, Y . Xiao, Y . Wang, D. Stan- ton, J. Shor, R. Weiss, R. Clark, and R. A. Saurous, “Towards end-to-end prosody transfer for expressive speech synthesis with tacotron,” in International Conference on Machine Learning , vol. 80, 2018, pp. 4693–4702

    2018

  6. [14]

    Style tokens: Unsu- pervised style modeling, control and transfer in end-to-end speech synthesis,

    Y . Wang, D. Stanton, Y . Zhang, R.-S. Ryan, E. Battenberg, J. Shor, Y . Xiao, Y . Jia, F. Ren, and R. A. Saurous, “Style tokens: Unsu- pervised style modeling, control and transfer in end-to-end speech synthesis,” in International Conference on Machine Learning , vol. 80, 201...

    2018

  7. [15]

    Meta-stylespeech : Multi-speaker adaptive text-to-speech generation,

    D. Min, D. B. Lee, E. Yang, and S. J. Hwang, “Meta-stylespeech : Multi-speaker adaptive text-to-speech generation,” in Interna- tional Conference on Machine Learning , vol. 139, 2021, pp. 7748–7759

    2021

  8. [16]

    Qi-tts: Questioning intonation control for emotional speech synthesis,

    H. Tang, X. Zhang, J. Wang, N. Cheng, and J. Xiao, “Qi-tts: Questioning intonation control for emotional speech synthesis,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  9. [17]

    Generspeech: Towards style transfer for generalizable out-of-domain text-to- speech,

    R. Huang, Y . Ren, J. Liu, C. Cui, and Z. Zhao, “Generspeech: Towards style transfer for generalizable out-of-domain text-to- speech,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, 2022, pp. 10 970–10 983

    2022

  10. [18]

    Good helper is around you: Attention- driven masked image modeling,

    Z. Liu, J. Gui, and H. Luo, “Good helper is around you: Attention- driven masked image modeling,” Proceedings of the AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1799–1807, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Furthermore, we introduce style direction adjustment, which adjusts the ex- tracted style by modifying its angle using content and prosody vectors in the embedding space

    in our quantization process, which enables more precise style extraction, particularly in voiced regions. Furthermore, we introduce style direction adjustment, which adjusts the ex- tracted style by modifying its angle using content and prosody vectors in the embedding space. ...

  12. [20]

    Tsp-tts: Text-based style predictor with residual vector quantization for expressive text-to- speech,

    D. Seong, H. Lee, and J.-H. Chang, “Tsp-tts: Text-based style predictor with residual vector quantization for expressive text-to- speech,” in Interspeech 2024, 2024, pp. 1780–1784

    2024

  13. [21]

    TCSinger: Zero-shot singing voice synthesis with style transfer and multi-level style control,

    Y . Zhang, Z. Jiang, R. Li, C. Pan, J. He, R. Huang, C. Wang, and Z. Zhao, “TCSinger: Zero-shot singing voice synthesis with style transfer and multi-level style control,” in Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, 2024, pp. 1960–1975

    2024

  14. [22]

    Estimating or propa- gating gradients through stochastic neurons for conditional com- putation,

    Y . Bengio, N. L ´eonard, and A. Courville, “Estimating or propa- gating gradients through stochastic neurons for conditional com- putation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.3432, 2013

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Signal compression based on models of human perception,

    N. Jayant, J. Johnston, and R. S. Safranek, “Signal compression based on models of human perception,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 1385–1422, 1993

    1993

  16. [24]

    Not all image re- gions matter: Masked vector quantization for autoregressive im- age generation,

    M. Huang, Z. Mao, Q. Wang, and Y . Zhang, “Not all image re- gions matter: Masked vector quantization for autoregressive im- age generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 2002–2011

    2023

  17. [25]

    Restructuring vector quantization with the rotation trick,

    C. Fifty, R. G. Junkins, D. Duan, A. Iyengar, J. W. Liu, E. Amid, S. Thrun, and C. Re, “Restructuring vector quantization with the rotation trick,” in International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations, 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    Autoregres- sive image generation using residual quantization,

    D. Lee, C. Kim, S. Kim, M. Cho, and W.-S. Han, “Autoregres- sive image generation using residual quantization,” in Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, 2022, pp. 11 523–11 532

    2022

  19. [27]

    A convnet for the 2020s,

    Z. Liu, H. Mao, C.-Y . Wu, C. Feichtenhofer, T. Darrell, and S. Xie, “A convnet for the 2020s,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2022, pp. 11 976–11 986

    2022

  20. [28]

    Cross-speaker emotion disentangling and transfer for end-to-end speech synthe- sis,

    T. Li, X. Wang, Q. Xie, Z. Wang, and L. Xie, “Cross-speaker emotion disentangling and transfer for end-to-end speech synthe- sis,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech and Lang. Proc., vol. 30, p. 1448–1460, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Bigvgan: A universal neural vocoder with large-scale training,

    S.-g. Lee, W. Ping, B. Ginsburg, B. Catanzaro, and S. Yoon, “Bigvgan: A universal neural vocoder with large-scale training,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Syntaspeech: Syntax- aware generative adversarial text-to-speech,

    Z. Ye, Z. Zhao, Y . Ren, and F. Wu, “Syntaspeech: Syntax- aware generative adversarial text-to-speech,” in Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial In- telligence, IJCAI-22, 2022, pp. 4468–4474, main Track

    2022

  23. [31]

    Emotional voice con- version: Theory, databases and esd,

    K. Zhou, B. Sisman, R. Liu, and H. Li, “Emotional voice con- version: Theory, databases and esd,”Speech Communication, vol. 137, pp. 1–18, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion,

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, “Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Gaussian error linear units (gelus),

    D. Hendrycks and K. Gimpel, “Gaussian error linear units (gelus),” arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. u. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Utmos: Utokyo-sarulab system for voicemos challenge 2022,

    T. Saeki, D. Xin, W. Nakata, T. Koriyama, S. Takamichi, and H. Saruwatari, “Utmos: Utokyo-sarulab system for voicemos challenge 2022,” in Interspeech 2022, 2022, pp. 4521–4525

    2022

  28. [36]

    Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak su- pervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, T. Xu, G. Brockman, C. Mcleavey, and I. Sutskever, “Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak su- pervision,” in International Conference on Machine Learning , vol. 202, 2023, pp. 28 492–28 518

    2023

  29. [37]

    Wavlm: Large-scale self- supervised pre-training for full stack speech processing,

    S. Chen, C. Wang, Z. Chen, Y . Wu, S. Liu, Z. Chen, J. Li, N. Kanda, T. Yoshioka, X. Xiaoet al., “Wavlm: Large-scale self- supervised pre-training for full stack speech processing,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1505–1518, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.