Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T13:44:21.032843Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 33 of 33 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2505.21407.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T13:44:21.032843Z
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-03T11:55:53.395391Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
33 of 33 outbound references displayed
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Observation c022b1d6-c528-4683-8081-e6b96d80bf1d · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (6)] with one-sided zealots as follows, dx dt = (1 − x − z) f (x + z) − x f(1 − x − z), (29) where f (x) is the social impact function
Reference 1
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation ceb3b21e-6bc2-4ef3-bd73-c2fee13f132a · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact Thus, for any q < 1 we find f ′(x) → +∞ for x ↓ 0
Reference 2
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 24744c71-613f-4df2-a461-acc0910d9b16 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (13)] can be generalised as follows, to account for a social impact function f , dx dt = (1 − x − z) f (x + z)π+(x, z) −x f(1 − x − z)π−(x, z)
Reference 3
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation fe19a8f0-92c4-44eb-88a7-3f50e4b78268 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (33) For α > 1/2 this condition is always fulfilled (for all z) as (1 − α)/α is then smaller than one
Reference 4
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 24758465-ebe2-4aff-9342-4da67b5b23da · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact We focus again on f (x) =xq, noting that q-deformed evolutionary dynamics without zealots were pre- viously studied in Ref
Reference 5
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 09dd3852-372b-43b8-b9d4-59c116a4a510 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact Allowing for a general social impact 11 function, Eqs
Reference 6
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 10cda3b9-2c84-4527-8eee-3be3b667c807 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact Unresolved cited work
Reference 7
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 2cf7f996-8f50-4f16-bfb5-950d9d7b35bb · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact This is restricted to the nonlinear voter model and evolu- tionary games
Reference 8
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation a58e500e-4b67-428a-b9da-56ea53bf11cf · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (5) T + n = N S − n N n + Z N − 1 q , T − n = N n N N − Z − n N − 1 q
Reference 9
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 3b1f3161-514a-4036-9753-85f619f2a854 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact Unresolved cited work
Reference 10
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation e552aba9-086c-4e0b-98d3-a5381d324c41 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact We report simulation results in Fig
Reference 11
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation b610c149-d2f2-42d4-be12-63f9cfb4fb6e · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact For example in Fig
Reference 12
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 24c422e6-318b-4d68-8083-347516aa80e5 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact 6 we plot the quasi-stationary distribution for the nonlinear voter model with varying numbers of zealots
Reference 13
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation e8a79048-2b11-46cd-ac36-0ff610f24d1e · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact For fixed model parameters (e.g
Reference 14
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f33dbe8e-60af-499e-b3b6-b480ead72679 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (6) becomes dx dt = (1 − x − z) x + z 2 q − x 1 − x − z 2 q
Reference 15
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 1a3db1ee-e78d-4eb2-b1f1-a11b87f0c9d3 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (6) becomes dx dt = (1 − x − z)(x + z)q − x(1 − x − z)q
Reference 16
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 4699fdd5-6087-43de-8763-e36a8d47d9fa · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (A6) has two additional fixed points x∗ a and x∗ b where x∗ a < x∗ b < x∗ c
Reference 17
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 7b5ad04f-84a2-441f-85d6-ad47519c4239 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (A6) has one additional fixed point x∗ a < x∗ c that is stable from the left and unstable from the right
Reference 18
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation e95cf359-c29c-4bbc-896a-48ed3765f9c4 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (A6) has no additional fixed points
Reference 19
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 358f4570-ef17-4880-ab40-a18baf7837d1 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (6)] becomes ˙x = (1 − x − z) x + 1 2 (1 + δ )z q − x 1 − x − 1 2 (1 + δ )z q
Reference 20
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation e4f1263a-47d0-4a87-95e3-96a468c7a5c6 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (A13) Here we derive a closed form approximation to Eq
Reference 21
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 60cd5867-b427-40dc-8f91-d9807b5f0877 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact α x + z 2 + (1 − α) 1 − x − z 2 # − x 1 − x − z 2 ×
Reference 22
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 1e29e15e-a7ef-4c88-b7b9-af70bb04e56c · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (B3) The stabilities of the various fixed points can be deduced by looking an interactive plot of Eq
Reference 23
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 17680ffd-1d76-442c-8cbe-66424e3ba3b5 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (13) becomes dx dt = (1 − x − z)(x + z) × α(x + z) + (1 − α)(1 − x − z) − x(1 − x − z) × (1 − α)(x + z) +α(1 − x − z)
Reference 24
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 477f380d-d8f9-4bec-8097-8dfc4b03581b · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact α x + 1 + δ 2 z + (1 − α) 1 − x − 1 + δ 2 z # − x 1 − x − 1 + δ 2 z ×
Reference 25
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation ead4ce14-b268-4070-a525-d043eceae7b8 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (B4) except with a nonlinear social impact function xq, dx dt = (1 − x − z)(x + z)q × α(x + z) + (1 − α)(1 − x − z) − x(1 − x − z)q × (1 − α)(x + z) +α(1 − x − z)
Reference 26
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 23cccefc-7d3f-4e8e-8334-f381090e6ab5 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (21) become Σ − (1 − z) ≤∆ ≤ −Σ + (1 − z), −Σ ≤∆ ≤ Σ
Reference 27
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation c7da69ae-3d34-42bd-b3eb-b33ac6ecaba7 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (21)] are identical to the conditions for balanced zealots [Eqs
Reference 28
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 0a65ddd8-13dd-4933-ae0f-c6cb9c294e9d · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (21) are again the same as in the balanced and one-sided zealots cases, i.e
Reference 29
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 0dbe97c3-a512-4eda-9dec-73541b19617f · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (35) we form the Jacobian matrix evaluated at C+ [Eq
Reference 30
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 82bc1cd9-279c-4dbb-9d63-e535fbd3d894 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (37) that the consensus fixed point C+ is stable when q < 1 and unstable when q > 1
Reference 31
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 7dcea340-2bb5-4553-93f3-b04ea17808c4 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact (39) We broadly follow the steps in Ref
Reference 32
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation e6fb6500-25ea-475d-bde3-dbeff26aa3e0 · outbound
Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact Stochastic evolutionary game dynamics,
Reference 33
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation f0ee5455-bcf5-472a-9ac9-75b7289d64ab · inbound
Reducibility of higher-order to pairwise interactions: Social impact models on hypergraphs Breaking coexistence: Zealotry vs. nonlinear social impact
Reference 34
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.