Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 86 references

Structural Hole Traps in III-V Quantum Dots

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fully coordinated, distorted phosphorus atoms can create hole traps in III-V quantum dots, even with perfect chloride passivation.

desk verdict A solid computational paper with a plausible new mechanism for hole traps on fully coordinated P atoms in III-V QDs; the main caveat is that the prevalence statistics rest on a ground-state single-particle proxy, and the ML validation is partly circular. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22419 v1 pith:CKTFRNPQ submitted 2025-05-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ezra Alexander , Alexandra Alexiu , Matthias Kick , Troy Van Voorhis This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords structuraltrapsquantumdotsindiumphosphidegalliumholedensityfunctionaltheorymolecularorbitalsurfacepassivation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses density functional theory on a library of 360 InP and GaP quantum dot models to argue that hole traps do not require under-coordinated surface atoms. It identifies a class of 'structural traps' localized on fully coordinated phosphorus atoms whose bonds or bond angles are distorted, and shows these states persist even when the surface is perfectly passivated with chloride. The proposed molecular-orbital mechanism is that a stretched P–cation bond or a see-saw angular distortion reduces the overlap of a phosphorus $3p$ orbital with its bonded cations, destabilizing that orbital into the band gap. If this is correct, surface passivation alone cannot fully eliminate hole traps in III-V quantum dots, which points to structural rigidification, not just ligand chemistry, as the path to brighter dots.

What carries the argument

The central object is the structural trap: a well-localized occupied Kohn-Sham state between the localization-derived valence band maximum and conduction band minimum whose largest in-state Löwdin population lies on an atom with coordination number four or greater. The mechanistic probe is a 100-frame geodesic interpolation from an idealized tetrahedral geometry to each distorted trap center, modeled as a $\mathrm{PLi}_4^+$ cluster with bond angles preserved, whose three highest occupied molecular orbitals represent the phosphorus $3p$ manifold. Two distortion modalities emerge: bond stretch, where the HOMO occupies the space abandoned by the leaving cation, and angular distortion toward a see-saw geometry, where the HOMO bisects a near-180° bond angle; both raise the HOMO by roughly 0.1–0.5 eV. The operative quantity is the integrated MO density within the covalent radii of bonded cations, which correlates inversely with the MO's energy.

What would settle it

Recompute the electronic structure of the perfectly Cl-passivated InP QD with an excited-state method, such as a constrained DFT or GW-BSE calculation that lets a hole relax: if the P-4c localized state leaves the gap or delocalizes, the ground-state proxy fails. A cheaper geometric test removes the distortion, restoring ideal tetrahedral bond lengths and angles around every four-coordinate phosphorus while freezing the rest of the dot; if the in-gap state survives, the distortion is not the cause.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that fully coordinated atoms with distorted local geometries generate trap states in III-V quantum dots independently of coordination defects. Across 360 relaxed DFT models, 578 hole traps localize on four-coordinate phosphorus atoms, and such states appear even in a perfectly Cl-passivated, charge-neutral, symmetric 2.7 nm InP QD whose deepest hole trap has a depth of 0.25 eV. Interpolating clipped trap-center geometries as $\mathrm{PLi}_4^+$ clusters from an ideal tetrahedron to the observed distortion reproduces the trap orbital's orientation for 80.2% of single-center cases. The unifying factor is the extent of each phosphorus $3p$ orbital's overlap with bonded cations: bond stretches and see-saw-like angular distortions that reduce this overlap destabilize the highest occupied orbital into the gap, a picture the authors describe as crystal field theory inverted for an anionic center. They conclude that anion-centered structural traps are a distinct, ligand-agnostic source of hole trapping that core-shell passivation may not remove unless the shell rigidifies the structure.

Load-bearing premise

The whole trap census rests on treating localized occupied Kohn-Sham orbitals between the localization-derived band edges as the actual charge-trapping states, even though trapping is an excited-state phenomenon; if that ground-state proxy is wrong, the prevalence statistics, the ligand-independence claim, and the molecular-orbital explanation all lose their foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • P-4c structural traps account for 578 of 4,051 hole traps in the dataset, and in 39 of 360 QDs they are the deepest hole trap, so they are not a rare side effect.
  • Since anion-centered structural traps appear with both F- and Cl- termination, ligand exchange and coverage strategies aimed at under-coordinated cations will not remove them.
  • Core-shell passivation can only eliminate structural traps if the shell rigidifies the underlying lattice; without that rigidity the traps persist even with fully coordinated surfaces.
  • About 20% of structural traps are not explained by a single distorted center and instead involve internal electric fields or cooperative distortions across neighboring phosphorus sites.
  • A gradient-boosted classifier combining geometry and DFT-derived features reaches a macro f1 of 0.95 in separating trapping from inert P-4c, adding independent support to the structural-trap labels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the purely geometric mechanism is right, structurally similar traps should appear in other strained nanocrystal systems, such as lattice-mismatched core/shell dots or ligand-strained facets, even when every atom is fully coordinated; that is a testable prediction.
  • Thermal fluctuations or transient photoinduced distortions could momentarily create or deepen these traps, implying a dynamical trapping pathway invisible in ground-state-optimized geometries and accessible to finite-temperature or time-resolved simulation.
  • The inverted crystal-field picture suggests a design heuristic: any coating, shell, or embedding matrix that increases cation-anion orbital overlap or locks tetrahedral angles should suppress structural traps, so rigidity, not just passivation chemistry, becomes the optimization target.
  • Because the paper shows geometric distortion alone is insufficient to guarantee a trap (many distorted P-4c are inert), the practical diagnostic value lies in the DFT-based classifier features, which could be ported to screen candidate passivation schemes before synthesis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a computational study of 360 InP and GaP quantum dots modeled with PBE-optimized geometries and PBE0 single-point electronic structure. Using Pipek-Mezey orbital localization to define the VBM and CBM, the authors identify 'structural trap states' localized on fully coordinated, distorted atoms, and focus on phosphorus-centered hole traps (P-4c). They find 578 such traps (2.1% of P-4c atoms, average depth 0.19 eV), show that analogous traps appear in two defect-free Cl--passivated QDs, and propose a molecular-orbital mechanism in which bond stretching or see-saw-like angular distortion reduces P 3p overlap with bonded cations and pushes an orbital into the gap. The mechanism is supported by PLi4+ interpolations, unsupervised clustering, and a gradient-boosted classifier.

Significance. If the mechanism is correct, it identifies a qualitatively new source of hole traps in III-V QDs: fully coordinated but distorted anions, which would not be removed by stoichiometric core/shell passivation that only eliminates dangling bonds. This is a potentially important contribution to the understanding of low photoluminescence yields in InP QDs and gives a concrete design principle (lattice rigidification). The paper's strengths include a large and diverse QD library, a parameter-free PBE0-based interpolation scheme that yields a falsifiable Walsh-diagram picture, explicit Cl- passivation controls, and publicly released classifier code. The main limitations concern the excited-state proxy on which the trap census rests, the thin ligand-independence evidence, and the partly self-referential machine-learning validation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Computational Methodology, paragraph 2; Conclusions, final paragraph] The entire trap census is built on identifying hole traps with localized occupied Kohn-Sham states between a Pipek-Mezey-localization-derived VBM and CBM. The text correctly states that charge trapping is an excited-state phenomenon and cites prior work for the proxy, and it closes by deferring excited-state validation. Because P-4c structural traps are shallow (average 0.19 eV; deepest near 1 eV), the assignment of a state as a 'trap' rather than part of the valence band is sensitive to the localization procedure and to self-interaction or polarization errors. Every prevalence number in the paper (4,051 hole traps, 578 P-4c traps, the 2.1% incidence, and the Cl- passivation result) inherits this risk. I recommend adding a subset of ΔSCF or constrained-DFT calculations on representative P-4c centers to confirm that an added hole actually localizes, or, at minimum, explicitly labeling the prevalence and ligand-independence conclusions as conditional on the single-particle proxy.
  2. [Overview of Structural Trap States, paragraph 6; Abstract] The ligand-independence claim is supported by only two Cl- passivated QDs, one InP and one GaP. These two structures are charge-neutral, highly symmetric, and defect-free, whereas the F- library contains many induced vacancies and slight charges; the comparison therefore changes ligand identity, surface defect density, stoichiometry, and internal electric fields simultaneously. The statement that P-4c structural traps are 'relatively insensitive to the choice of ligand' goes beyond this evidence. The authors should either add Cl- (or other X-type) passivation on several morphologies and defect patterns, or restrict the abstract and conclusions to 'persist in a Cl- passivated model.'
  3. [Separating Trapping and Inert P-4c, paragraphs 2-4; Figure 5d] The GBT classifier is presented as validating the trap labels, but its three most important features are the MO energy relative to the VBM, pDOS, and localization, all of which are produced by the same Pipek-Mezey localization that defines the labels; the text explicitly notes that 'the top three features are all directly incorporated into our procedure for identifying the VBM.' The macro f1-score of 0.95 therefore largely measures how well the label-generating algorithm predicts itself. The geometry-only classifier (f1 0.74) is the correct out-of-procedure test, and it does not establish an independent physical separation. The sentence claiming that the classifier's high accuracy makes it unlikely that a significant proportion of structural traps are mislabeled should be removed or substantially qualified.
  4. [Interpolation of P-4c Structural Trap Centers, paragraph 4; Figure 3b] The reported 80.2% interpolation agreement is computed after excluding structural traps for which the orbital-orientation metric 'fail[s]' due to state mixing, but the number of excluded cases is not given. With a cutoff of 0.707 cosine similarity (45 degrees), a p orbital rotated by 45 degrees is still counted as 'well described,' which is permissive for a mechanism claim. Please report the excluded count and provide a sensitivity analysis with a stricter cutoff, since the 'over 80% of phosphorus-based structural traps are well described by a single center' claim rests on this number.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Computational Methodology, paragraph 3] 'Pipek-Mizey' should be 'Pipek-Mezey.'
  2. [Figure 4 caption] 'HBSCAN' should be 'HDBSCAN.'
  3. [Figure 5c caption] The legend says opaque points represent the test set while translucent points also represent the test set; one of these should be the training set.
  4. [Prevalence of Structural Traps, paragraph 3] The statement about 'our small (2.0%) and large (2.7%) QD models' uses a different denominator from the per-species rates (2.1% P-4c, 2.4% Ga-4c, 3.6% In-4c); please clarify whether these are all-4c-atom rates.
  5. [Interpolation of P-4c Structural Trap Centers, paragraph 1] The introduction promises that interpolations show whether structural traps are 'well described by a single center,' but the caveat about excluded mixed states is only introduced later; a one-sentence caveat in the introduction would avoid overstating the 80% figure.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The MO mechanism is independent, but the GBT 'label validation' is circular: its top features come from the same orbital-localization pipeline that defines the trap labels.

  1. self definitional [Separating Trapping and Inert P-4c (GBT classifier paragraph; labels defined in Clustering of P-4c Structural Trap Types and Computational Methodology)]
    "By introducing features obtained from DFT calculations, we are able to realize a gradient-boosted trees classifier that achieves a macro f1-score of 0.95. ... As expected, we find that the GBT classifier’s performance depends most strongly on categories of features that must be obtained from a DFT calculation, such as the energy, pDOS, and localization of the associated MO (Figure 5d). ... In fact, the top three features are all directly incorporated into our procedure for identifying the VBM."

    The paper presents the GBT classifier as validating its assigned structural-trap labels ('The creation of a tool that can separate bulk P-4c from structural trap centers accurately would not only be directly valuable, but would also validate our labels'). But those labels are produced by the Pipek-Mezey localization procedure that defines the VBM/CBM and identifies traps as localized occupied states between them. The classifier's most important features are the energy, pDOS, and localization of the associated MO, which the paper itself states are directly incorporated into that same VBM-identification procedure.

full rationale

The central mechanistic claim is not circular. The interpolation starts from an ideal tetrahedron, applies a measured distortion, and computes an orbital-energy rise in PLi4+ cutouts; the Walsh-diagram-style argument that stretched bonds or see-saw-like angles reduce P 3p overlap with bonded cations is independently computed and is not defined in terms of the trap labels. The Cl-passivated control QDs also provide an external check that P-4c structural traps are not an artifact of the F- passivation model. The paper's reliance on ground-state Kohn-Sham localized states as a proxy for hole traps is a genuine and acknowledged limitation, as the conclusion explicitly defers 'a full or approximate excited state electronic structure method' for testing transferability, but that is a correctness/validity caveat rather than circular reasoning; the proxy is cited to prior work, including non-self-cited demonstrations. The one concrete circularity is the machine-learning 'validation': the classifier's top features are directly incorporated into the very localization procedure that assigns the labels, so its near-perfect performance is partly by construction. For that reason the paper cannot claim the GBT result independently validates the trap census, although the interpolation-based MO explanation and the prevalence statistics remain meaningful conditional claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the ground-state single-particle trap proxy, the orbital-localization definition of VBM/CBM, the PLi4+ model system, and the representativeness of small F-/Cl- passivated model dots. There are no empirical fitting parameters, but several hand-chosen thresholds and ML hyperparameters affect the quantitative statements. The main invented concept is the 'structural trap' label itself, which has no direct experimental handle in this paper.

free parameters (4)
  • Interpolation agreement cutoff (cosine similarity) = 0.707 (45 degrees)
    Hand-chosen threshold in the Results section (Figure 3b); determines the 80.2%/19.8% split between structural traps well described and poorly described by the single-center interpolation.
  • Structural trap definition threshold = largest in-state Lowdin population on an atom with coordination number >= 4
    Definition in the Results section; this labeling choice determines all prevalence statistics, the interpolation set, and the ML training labels.
  • Geometric distortion cutoffs for descriptive statistics = 1.05x bond stretch and 120 degree maximum angle
    Used in the 'Separating Trapping and Inert P-4c' section to state that 73% of trap centers have a stretch >= 1.05 or an angle > 120. These hand-chosen cutoffs shape the comparison between trapping and bulk P-4c.
  • GBT classifier hyperparameters = not stated in the main text (SI III.II)
    The reported macro f1-score of 0.95 depends on hyperparameter choices that are only described in the unavailable Supporting Information.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Ground-state single-particle Kohn-Sham states identify charge-carrier traps.
    Computational Methodology paragraph 2 states that charge trapping is an inherently excited-state phenomenon, but localized mid-gap single-particle states in ground-state DFT are used as an acceptable cost-efficient alternative. If this proxy fails, all trap labels and statistics are invalid.
  • domain assumption Pipek-Mezey localization reliably determines VBM and CBM in dense eigenspectra.
    Computational Methodology paragraph 2; the algorithm defines the set of trap states, and the top ML features depend on this VBM placement.
  • domain assumption The PLi4+ cutout with Li substitutions preserves the electronic effect of the P center's distortion.
    Interpolation section: cations are replaced with lithium with bond angles preserved and bond lengths adjusted. The MO argument rests on this model system faithfully representing the real QD trap center; the paper cites SI II.I for validation.
  • domain assumption The DFT-relaxed model QD geometries resemble realistic colloidal QD surfaces.
    Models are core-only, 1.7-2.5 nm, mostly F- passivated with systematic vacancies. The prevalence claims and the generalization to experimental QDs depend on this representativeness, and the paper itself acknowledges the F- ligand challenge.
  • domain assumption The crystal field theory analogy is valid for an anionic center bonded to cations.
    The MO argument interprets reduced P 3p overlap with cations as destabilizing the orbital, in analogy to crystal field theory. This is a qualitative physical picture, not a derived theorem.
invented entities (1)
  • Structural trap state centered on a fully coordinated (4-coordinate) distorted P atom
    purpose: Explains shallow hole traps in III-V quantum dots without invoking under-coordinated dangling bonds; motivated as a ligand-independent trap modality.
    The state is defined and identified entirely within the paper's own DFT calculations (largest in-state Lowdin population on a 4-coordinate atom). No independent experimental observable or out-of-sample prediction is provided, so independent_evidence is False.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structural Hole Traps in III-V Quantum Dots." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CKTFRNPQ

@misc{pith2026250522419,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structural Hole Traps in III-V Quantum Dots},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CKTFRNPQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22419}
}
read the original abstract

Non-toxic III-V quantum dots (QDs) are plagued with a higher density of performance-limiting trap states than II-VI and IV-VI QDs. Such trap states are generally understood to arise from under-coordinated atoms on the QD surface. Here, we present computational evidence for, and an exploration of, trap states in InP and GaP QDs that arise from fully-coordinated atoms with distorted geometries, denoted here as structural traps. In particular, we focus on the properties of anion-centered hole traps, which we show to be relatively insensitive to the choice of the (typically cation-coordinating) ligand. Through interpolation of trap center cutouts, we arrive at a simple molecular orbital (MO) argument for the existence of structural traps, finding two main modalities: bond stretches and angular distortion to a see-saw-like geometry. These structural trap states will be important for understanding the low performance of III-V QDs, as even core-shell passivation may not remove these defects unless they can rigidify the structure. Moreover, they may lead to interesting dynamical properties as distorted structures could form transiently.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22419 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of phosphorus- (a) and indium- (b) localized structural trap states. Each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. In general, we find that cation-centered structural electron traps make up a larger [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Percentage of total trap states that are structural traps by (a) material, (b) QD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Interpolations of PLi + 4 cutouts. (a) Proposed Walsh diagram for the splitting of P 3p orbitals in PLi + 4 upon bond stretch (left) and angular distortion to a see-saw geometry (right). Inset molecular orbitals are taken directly from idealized models. (b) Histogram o…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding of feature vectors for all P-4c struc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of full GBT classifier performance and operative features. (a) Problem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A.; Rickert, L.; Gao, T.; Kaymazlar, K.; Heindel, T

    Vajner, D. A.; Rickert, L.; Gao, T.; Kaymazlar, K.; Heindel, T. Quantum Communication Using Semiconductor Quantum Dots . Advanced Quantum Technologies 2022, 5, 2100116

    2022

  2. [2]

    M.; Sigillito, A

    Zajac, D. M.; Sigillito, A. J.; Russ, M.; Borjans, F.; Taylor, J. M.; Burkard, G.; Petta, J. R. Resonantly driven CNOT gate for electron spins. Science 2018, 359, 439--442

    2018

  3. [3]

    Recent advances in quantum dots photocatalysts

    Sun, P.; Xing, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhou, W. Recent advances in quantum dots photocatalysts. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023, 458, 141399

    2023

  4. [4]

    Mechanistic insights into the influence of surface ligands on quantum dots for photocatalysis

    Chen, Y.; Yu, S.; Fan, X.-B.; Wu, L.-Z.; Zhou, Y. Mechanistic insights into the influence of surface ligands on quantum dots for photocatalysis. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2023, 11, 8497--8514

    2023

  5. [5]

    S.; Pandey, R.; Joshi, V.; Jain, V

    Gidwani, B.; Sahu, V.; Shukla, S. S.; Pandey, R.; Joshi, V.; Jain, V. K.; Vyas, A. Quantum dots: Prospectives , toxicity, advances and applications. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2021, 61, 102308

    2021

  6. [6]

    H.; Yang, J

    Park, K. H.; Yang, J. Y.; Jung, S.; Ko, B. M.; Song, G.; Hong, S.-J.; Kim, N. C.; Lee, D.; Song, S. H. Metallic Phase Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Quantum Dots as Promising Bio - Imaging Materials . Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1645

    2022

  7. [7]

    Advances, Challenges , and Perspectives for Heavy - Metal - Free Blue - Emitting Indium Phosphide Quantum Dot Light - Emitting Diodes

    Cui, Z.; Yang, D.; Qin, S.; Wen, Z.; He, H.; Mei, S.; Zhang, W.; Xing, G.; Liang, C.; Guo, R. Advances, Challenges , and Perspectives for Heavy - Metal - Free Blue - Emitting Indium Phosphide Quantum Dot Light - Emitting Diodes . Advanced Optical Materials 2023, 11, 2202036

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Development and challenges of indium phosphide-based quantum-dot light-emitting diodes

    Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Lin, O.; Niu, W.; Yang, C.; Tang, A. Development and challenges of indium phosphide-based quantum-dot light-emitting diodes. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews 2023, 55, 100588

    work page 2023

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Campalani, C.; Monbaliu, J.-C. M. Towards sustainable quantum dots: Regulatory framework, toxicity and emerging strategies. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2025, 163, 100940

    2025

  2. [10]

    F.; van der Poll, L

    Stam, M.; Almeida, G.; Ubbink, R. F.; van der Poll, L. M.; Vogel, Y. B.; Chen, H.; Giordano, L.; Schiettecatte, P.; Hens, Z.; Houtepen, A. J. Near- Unity Photoluminescence Quantum Yield of Core - Only InP Quantum Dots via a Simple Postsynthetic InF3 Treatment . ACS Nano 2024, ...

    2024

  3. [11]

    Near-infrared-absorbing and -emitting indium phosphide quantum dots via nucleation/growth modulation for killing multidrug-resistant bacteria

    Yuan, Y.; Tang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yu, X.; He, L.; Li, D.; Li, W. Near-infrared-absorbing and -emitting indium phosphide quantum dots via nucleation/growth modulation for killing multidrug-resistant bacteria. Chemical Engineering Journal 2025, 507, 160729

    2025

  4. [12]

    Highly efficient and stable InP / ZnSe / ZnS quantum dot light-emitting diodes

    Won, Y.-H.; Cho, O.; Kim, T.; Chung, D.-Y.; Kim, T.; Chung, H.; Jang, H.; Lee, J.; Kim, D.; Jang, E. Highly efficient and stable InP / ZnSe / ZnS quantum dot light-emitting diodes. Nature 2019, 575, 634--638

    2019

  5. [13]

    Stoichiometry- Controlled InP - Based Quantum Dots : Synthesis , Photoluminescence , and Electroluminescence

    Li, Y.; Hou, X.; Dai, X.; Yao, Z.; Lv, L.; Jin, Y.; Peng, X. Stoichiometry- Controlled InP - Based Quantum Dots : Synthesis , Photoluminescence , and Electroluminescence . Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141, 6448--6452

    2019

  6. [14]

    A.; Katari, J

    Guzelian, A. A.; Katari, J. E. B.; Kadavanich, A. V.; Banin, U.; Hamad, K.; Juban, E.; Alivisatos, A. P.; Wolters, R. H.; Arnold, C. C.; Heath, J. R. Synthesis of Size - Selected , Surface - Passivated InP Nanocrystals . The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1996, 100, 7212--7219

    1996

  7. [15]

    InP quantum dots: Electronic structure, surface effects, and the redshifted emission

    Fu, H.; Zunger, A. InP quantum dots: Electronic structure, surface effects, and the redshifted emission. Physical Review B 1997, 56, 1496--1508

    1997

  8. [16]

    A Layer -by- Layer Growth Strategy for Large - Size InP / ZnSe / ZnS Core – Shell Quantum Dots Enabling High - Efficiency Light - Emitting Diodes

    Cao, F.; Wang, S.; Wang, F.; Wu, Q.; Zhao, D.; Yang, X. A Layer -by- Layer Growth Strategy for Large - Size InP / ZnSe / ZnS Core – Shell Quantum Dots Enabling High - Efficiency Light - Emitting Diodes . Chemistry of Materials 2018, 30, 8002--8007

    2018

  9. [17]

    E.; Stein, J

    Hughes, K. E.; Stein, J. L.; Friedfeld, M. R.; Cossairt, B. M.; Gamelin, D. R. Effects of Surface Chemistry on the Photophysics of Colloidal InP Nanocrystals . ACS Nano 2019, 13, 14198--14207

    2019

  10. [18]

    M.; Kim, T.-G.; Yun, D.-J.; Lim, M.; Ko, D.-S.; Jung, C.; Won, N.; Park, S.; Jeon, W

    Sung, Y. M.; Kim, T.-G.; Yun, D.-J.; Lim, M.; Ko, D.-S.; Jung, C.; Won, N.; Park, S.; Jeon, W. S.; Lee, H. S.; Kim, J.-H.; Jun, S.; Sul, S.; Hwang, S. Increasing the Energy Gap between Band - Edge and Trap States Slows Down Picosecond Carrier Trapping in Highly Luminescent InP...

    2021

  11. [19]

    F.; Binder, M.; Bohn, B

    Richter, A. F.; Binder, M.; Bohn, B. J.; Grumbach, N.; Neyshtadt, S.; Urban, A. S.; Feldmann, J. Fast Electron and Slow Hole Relaxation in InP - Based Colloidal Quantum Dots . ACS Nano 2019, 13, 14408--14415

    2019

  12. [20]

    M.; Williams, N

    Janke, E. M.; Williams, N. E.; She, C.; Zherebetskyy, D.; Hudson, M. H.; Wang, L.; Gosztola, D. J.; Schaller, R. D.; Lee, B.; Sun, C.; Engel, G. S.; Talapin, D. V. Origin of Broad Emission Spectra in InP Quantum Dots : Contributions from Structural and Electronic Disorder . Jo...

    2018

  13. [21]

    Highly Bright , Narrow Emissivity of InP Quantum Dots Synthesized by Aminophosphine : Effects of Double Shelling Scheme and Ga Treatment

    Jo, J.-H.; Jo, D.-Y.; Choi, S.-W.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, H.-M.; Yoon, S.-Y.; Kim, Y.; Han, J.-N.; Yang, H. Highly Bright , Narrow Emissivity of InP Quantum Dots Synthesized by Aminophosphine : Effects of Double Shelling Scheme and Ga Treatment . Advanced Optical Materials 2021, 9, 2100427

    2021

  14. [22]

    Effectual Interface and Defect Engineering for Auger Recombination Suppression in Bright InP / ZnSeS / ZnS Quantum Dots

    Lee, Y.; Jo, D.-Y.; Kim, T.; Jo, J.-H.; Park, J.; Yang, H.; Kim, D. Effectual Interface and Defect Engineering for Auger Recombination Suppression in Bright InP / ZnSeS / ZnS Quantum Dots . ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14, 12479--12487

    2022

  15. [23]

    Kirkwood, N.; Monchen, J. O. V.; Crisp, R. W.; Grimaldi, G.; Bergstein, H. A. C.; du Fossé, I.; van der Stam, W.; Infante, I.; Houtepen, A. J. Finding and Fixing Traps in II – VI and III – V Colloidal Quantum Dots : The Importance of Z - Type Ligand Passivation . Journal of th...

    2018

  16. [24]

    L.; Mader, E

    Stein, J. L.; Mader, E. A.; Cossairt, B. M. Luminescent InP Quantum Dots with Tunable Emission by Post - Synthetic Modification with Lewis Acids . The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2016, 7, 1315--1320

    2016

  17. [25]

    Optical Characteristics of the Surface Defects in InP Colloidal Quantum Dots for Highly Efficient Light - Emitting Applications

    Cho, E.; Kim, T.; Choi, S.-m.; Jang, H.; Min, K.; Jang, E. Optical Characteristics of the Surface Defects in InP Colloidal Quantum Dots for Highly Efficient Light - Emitting Applications . ACS Applied Nano Materials 2018, 1, 7106--7114

    2018

  18. [26]

    H.; Wang, L.-W.; Jang, E.; Alivisatos, A

    Kim, T.-G.; Zherebetskyy, D.; Bekenstein, Y.; Oh, M. H.; Wang, L.-W.; Jang, E.; Alivisatos, A. P. Trap Passivation in Indium - Based Quantum Dots through Surface Fluorination : Mechanism and Applications . ACS Nano 2018, 12, 11529--11540

    2018

  19. [27]

    C.; Zito, J.; Infante, I.; Hens, Z

    Dümbgen, K. C.; Zito, J.; Infante, I.; Hens, Z. Shape, Electronic Structure , and Trap States in Indium Phosphide Quantum Dots . Chemistry of Materials 2021, 33, 6885--6896

    2021

  20. [28]

    Enright, M. J. et al. Role of Atomic Structure on Exciton Dynamics and Photoluminescence in NIR Emissive InAs / InP / ZnSe Quantum Dots . The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126, 7576--7587

    2022

  21. [29]

    Enhanced Surface Passivation of InP / ZnSe Quantum Dots by Zinc Acetate Exposure

    Schiettecatte, P.; Giordano, L.; Cruyssaert, B.; Bonifas, G.; De Vlamynck, N.; Van Avermaet, H.; Zhao, Q.; Vantomme, A.; Nayral, C.; Delpech, F.; Hens, Z. Enhanced Surface Passivation of InP / ZnSe Quantum Dots by Zinc Acetate Exposure . Chemistry of Materials 2024, 36, 5996--6005

    2024

  22. [30]

    W.; Kim, S.; Jang, H.; Lee, M.; Park, T

    Gwak, N.; Shin, S.; Yoo, H.; Seo, G. W.; Kim, S.; Jang, H.; Lee, M.; Park, T. H.; Kim, B. J.; Lim, J.; Kim, S. Y.; Kim, S.; Hwang, G. W.; Oh, N. Highly Luminescent Shell - Less Indium Phosphide Quantum Dots Enabled by Atomistically Tailored Surface States . Advanced Materials ...

    2024

  23. [31]

    R.; Van Voorhis, T

    Alexander, E.; Kick, M.; McIsaac, A. R.; Van Voorhis, T. Understanding Trap States in InP and GaP Quantum Dots through Density Functional Theory . Nano Letters 2024, 24, 7227--7235

    2024

  24. [32]

    P.; Divitini, G.; Infante, I.; De Trizio, L.; Manna, L

    Zhu, D.; Bahmani Jalali, H.; Saleh, G.; Di Stasio, F.; Prato, M.; Polykarpou, N.; Othonos, A.; Christodoulou, S.; Ivanov, Y. P.; Divitini, G.; Infante, I.; De Trizio, L.; Manna, L. Boosting the Photoluminescence Efficiency of InAs Nanocrystals Synthesized with Aminoarsine via ...

    2023

  25. [33]

    Stam, M.; du Fossé, I.; Infante, I.; Houtepen, A. J. Guilty as Charged : The Role of Undercoordinated Indium in Electron - Charged Indium Phosphide Quantum Dots . ACS Nano 2023, 17, 18576--18583

    2023

  26. [34]

    F.; Almeida, G.; Iziyi, H.; du Fossé, I.; Verkleij, R.; Ganapathy, S.; van Eck, E

    Ubbink, R. F.; Almeida, G.; Iziyi, H.; du Fossé, I.; Verkleij, R.; Ganapathy, S.; van Eck, E. R. H.; Houtepen, A. J. A Water - Free In Situ HF Treatment for Ultrabright InP Quantum Dots . Chemistry of Materials 2022, 34, 10093--10103

    2022

  27. [35]

    J.; Hens, Z.; Owen, J

    Houtepen, A. J.; Hens, Z.; Owen, J. S.; Infante, I. On the Origin of Surface Traps in Colloidal II – VI Semiconductor Nanocrystals . Chemistry of Materials 2017, 29, 752--761

    2017

  28. [36]

    R.; Van Voorhis, T

    Goldzak, T.; McIsaac, A. R.; Van Voorhis, T. Colloidal CdSe nanocrystals are inherently defective. Nature Communications 2021, 12, 890

    2021

  29. [37]

    R.; Goldzak, T.; Van Voorhis, T

    McIsaac, A. R.; Goldzak, T.; Van Voorhis, T. It Is a Trap !: The Effect of Self - Healing of Surface Defects on the Excited States of CdSe Nanocrystals . The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2023, 14, 1174--1181

    2023

  30. [38]

    A.; Senftle, T

    Bhati, M.; Ivanov, S. A.; Senftle, T. P.; Tretiak, S.; Ghosh, D. How structural and vibrational features affect optoelectronic properties of non-stoichiometric quantum dots: computational insights. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 7176--7185

    2023

  31. [39]

    M.; Chakraborty, A

    Elward, J. M.; Chakraborty, A. Effect of Dot Size on Exciton Binding Energy and Electron – Hole Recombination Probability in CdSe Quantum Dots . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2013, 9, 4351--4359

    2013

  32. [40]

    A.; Ivanov, S.; Prezhdo, O

    Kilina, S.; Velizhanin, K. A.; Ivanov, S.; Prezhdo, O. V.; Tretiak, S. Surface Ligands Increase Photoexcitation Relaxation Rates in CdSe Quantum Dots . ACS Nano 2012, 6, 6515--6524

    2012

  33. [41]

    Xia, Y. et al. Facet Control for Trap - State Suppression in Colloidal Quantum Dot Solids . Advanced Functional Materials 2020, 30, 2000594

    2020

  34. [42]

    A.; Raulerson, E

    Bender, J. A.; Raulerson, E. K.; Li, X.; Goldzak, T.; Xia, P.; Van Voorhis, T.; Tang, M. L.; Roberts, S. T. Surface States Mediate Triplet Energy Transfer in Nanocrystal – Acene Composite Systems . Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140, 7543--7553

    2018

  35. [43]

    Tolerance of Intrinsic Defects in PbS Quantum Dots

    Zherebetskyy, D.; Zhang, Y.; Salmeron, M.; Wang, L.-W. Tolerance of Intrinsic Defects in PbS Quantum Dots . The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2015, 6, 4711--4716

    2015

  36. [44]

    P.; Galli, G

    Vörös, M.; Brawand, N. P.; Galli, G. Hydrogen Treatment as a Detergent of Electronic Trap States in Lead Chalcogenide Nanoparticles . Chemistry of Materials 2017, 29, 2485--2493

    2017

  37. [45]

    P.; Pressler, K.; Kang, J.; Koscher, B

    Nenon, D. P.; Pressler, K.; Kang, J.; Koscher, B. A.; Olshansky, J. H.; Osowiecki, W. T.; Koc, M. A.; Wang, L.-W.; Alivisatos, A. P. Design Principles for Trap - Free CsPbX3 Nanocrystals : Enumerating and Eliminating Surface Halide Vacancies with Softer Lewis Bases . Journal o...

    2018

  38. [46]

    T.; Almeida, G.; Spruit, A

    Du Fossé, I.; Mulder, J. T.; Almeida, G.; Spruit, A. G. M.; Infante, I.; Grozema, F. C.; Houtepen, A. J. Limits of Defect Tolerance in Perovskite Nanocrystals : Effect of Local Electrostatic Potential on Trap States . Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144, 11059--11063

    2022

  39. [47]

    Electronic and optical properties of defect CdIn 2 Te 4 chalcopyrite semiconductor: A first principle approach

    Mishra, S.; Ganguli, B. Electronic and optical properties of defect CdIn 2 Te 4 chalcopyrite semiconductor: A first principle approach. Materials Chemistry and Physics 2016, 173, 429--437

    2016

  40. [48]

    Effect of structural distortion and nature of bonding on the electronic properties of defect and Li -substituted CuInSe 2 chalcopyrite semiconductors

    Mishra, S.; Ganguli, B. Effect of structural distortion and nature of bonding on the electronic properties of defect and Li -substituted CuInSe 2 chalcopyrite semiconductors. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2012, 512, 17--22

    2012

  41. [49]

    S.; Pereziabova, T

    Baimuratov, A. S.; Pereziabova, T. P.; Zhu, W.; Leonov, M. Y.; Baranov, A. V.; Fedorov, A. V.; Rukhlenko, I. D. Optical Anisotropy of Topologically Distorted Semiconductor Nanocrystals . Nano Letters 2017, 17, 5514--5520, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2017

  42. [50]

    G.; Unger, E

    Oksenberg, E.; Merdasa, A.; Houben, L.; Kaplan-Ashiri, I.; Rothman, A.; Scheblykin, I. G.; Unger, E. L.; Joselevich, E. Large lattice distortions and size-dependent bandgap modulation in epitaxial halide perovskite nanowires. Nature Communications 2020, 11, 489

    2020

  43. [51]

    Crystal defect-mediated band-gap engineering: a new strategy for tuning the optical properties of Ag2Se quantum dots toward enhanced hydrogen evolution performance

    Cao, Q.; Cheng, Y.-F.; Bi, H.; Zhao, X.; Yuan, K.; Liu, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, M.; Che, R. Crystal defect-mediated band-gap engineering: a new strategy for tuning the optical properties of Ag2Se quantum dots toward enhanced hydrogen evolution performance. Journal of Materials Chemi...

    2015

  44. [52]

    N.; Ibáñez, M.; Krumeich, F.; Cervellino, A.; Frison, R.; Voznyy, O.; Sargent, E

    Bertolotti, F.; Dirin, D. N.; Ibáñez, M.; Krumeich, F.; Cervellino, A.; Frison, R.; Voznyy, O.; Sargent, E. H.; Kovalenko, M. V.; Guagliardi, A.; Masciocchi, N. Crystal symmetry breaking and vacancies in colloidal lead chalcogenide quantum dots. Nature Materials 2016, 15, 987--994

    2016

  45. [53]

    Z.; Bodnarchuk, M

    Isarov, M.; Tan, L. Z.; Bodnarchuk, M. I.; Kovalenko, M. V.; Rappe, A. M.; Lifshitz, E. Rashba Effect in a Single Colloidal CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystal Detected by Magneto - Optical Measurements . Nano Letters 2017, 17, 5020--5026

    2017

  46. [54]

    Halide Ligands To Release Strain in Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanoplatelets and Achieve High Brightness

    Dufour, M.; Qu, J.; Greboval, C.; Méthivier, C.; Lhuillier, E.; Ithurria, S. Halide Ligands To Release Strain in Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanoplatelets and Achieve High Brightness . ACS Nano 2019, 13, 5326--5334

    2019

  47. [55]

    N.; Kovalenko, M

    Moscheni, D.; Bertolotti, F.; Piveteau, L.; Protesescu, L.; Dirin, D. N.; Kovalenko, M. V.; Cervellino, A.; Pedersen, J. S.; Masciocchi, N.; Guagliardi, A. Size- Dependent Fault - Driven Relaxation and Faceting in Zincblende CdSe Colloidal Quantum Dots . ACS Nano 2018, 12, 125...

    2018

  48. [56]

    Lattice Strain and Defects Analysis in Nanostructured Semiconductor Materials and Devices by High - Resolution X - Ray Diffraction : Theoretical and Practical Aspects

    Dolabella, S.; Borzì, A.; Dommann, A.; Neels, A. Lattice Strain and Defects Analysis in Nanostructured Semiconductor Materials and Devices by High - Resolution X - Ray Diffraction : Theoretical and Practical Aspects . Small Methods 2022, 6, 2100932

    2022

  49. [57]

    S.; Malliakas, C

    Božin, E. S.; Malliakas, C. D.; Souvatzis, P.; Proffen, T.; Spaldin, N. A.; Kanatzidis, M. G.; Billinge, S. J. L. Entropically Stabilized Local Dipole Formation in Lead Chalcogenides . Science 2010, 330, 1660--1663

    2010

  50. [58]

    Guzelturk, B. et al. Dynamic lattice distortions driven by surface trapping in semiconductor nanocrystals. Nature Communications 2021, 12, 1860

    2021

  51. [59]

    Kim, B. H. et al. Critical differences in 3D atomic structure of individual ligand-protected nanocrystals in solution. Science 2020, 368, 60--67

    2020

  52. [60]

    Ligand-induced twisting of nanoplatelets and their self-assembly into chiral ribbons

    Jana, S.; de Frutos, M.; Davidson, P.; Abécassis, B. Ligand-induced twisting of nanoplatelets and their self-assembly into chiral ribbons. Science Advances 2017, 3, e1701483

    2017

  53. [61]

    Maaten, L. v. d.; Hinton, G. Visualizing Data using t- SNE . Journal of Machine Learning Research 2008, 9, 2579--2605

    2008

  54. [62]

    Campello, R. J. G. B.; Moulavi, D.; Zimek, A.; Sander, J. Hierarchical Density Estimates for Data Clustering , Visualization , and Outlier Detection . ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 2015, 10, 5:1--5:51

    2015

  55. [63]

    Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics 2001, 29, 1189--1232

    2001

  56. [64]

    Voznyy, O.; Zhitomirsky, D.; Stadler, P.; Ning, Z.; Hoogland, S.; Sargent, E. H. A Charge - Orbital Balance Picture of Doping in Colloidal Quantum Dot Solids . ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8448--8455

    2012

  57. [65]

    Kühne, T. D. et al. CP2K : An electronic structure and molecular dynamics software package - Quickstep : Efficient and accurate electronic structure calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 152, 194103

    2020

  58. [66]

    Shao, Y. et al. Advances in molecular quantum chemistry contained in the Q - Chem 4 program package. Molecular Physics 2015, 113, 184--215

    2015

  59. [67]

    P.; Blaha, P

    Kurth, S.; Perdew, J. P.; Blaha, P. Molecular and solid-state tests of density functional approximations: LSD , GGAs , and meta- GGAs . International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 1999, 75, 889--909

    1999

  60. [68]

    M.; Ugalde, J

    Azpiroz, J. M.; Ugalde, J. M.; Infante, I. Benchmark Assessment of Density Functional Methods on Group II – VI MX ( M = Zn , Cd ; X = S , Se , Te ) Quantum Dots . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2014, 10, 76--89

    2014

  61. [69]

    Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn : Design and assessment of accuracy

    Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn : Design and assessment of accuracy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2005, 7, 3297--3305

    2005

  62. [70]

    Boys, S. F. Construction of Some Molecular Orbitals to Be Approximately Invariant for Changes from One Molecule to Another . Reviews of Modern Physics 1960, 32, 296--299

    1960

  63. [71]

    Unitary Optimization of Localized Molecular Orbitals

    Lehtola, S.; Jónsson, H. Unitary Optimization of Localized Molecular Orbitals . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2013, 9, 5365--5372

    2013

  64. [72]

    Truhlar, D. G. Are Molecular Orbitals Delocalized ? Journal of Chemical Education 2012, 89, 573--574

    2012

  65. [73]

    Pipek, J.; Mezey, P. G. A fast intrinsic localization procedure applicable for ab initio and semiempirical linear combination of atomic orbital wave functions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1989, 90, 4916--4926

    1989

  66. [74]

    On the Non ‐ Orthogonality Problem Connected with the Use of Atomic Wave Functions in the Theory of Molecules and Crystals

    Löwdin, P. On the Non ‐ Orthogonality Problem Connected with the Use of Atomic Wave Functions in the Theory of Molecules and Crystals . The Journal of Chemical Physics 1950, 18, 365--375

    1950

  67. [75]

    C.; Martínez, T

    Zhu, X.; Thompson, K. C.; Martínez, T. J. Geodesic interpolation for reaction pathways. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2019, 150, 164103

    2019

  68. [76]

    Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python . Journal of Machine Learning Research 2011, 12, 2825--2830

    2011

  69. [77]

    UMAP : Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction

    McInnes, L.; Healy, J.; Melville, J. UMAP : Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction . 2020; http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426

    2020 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Advances in large margin classifiers 1999, 10, 61--74

    Platt, J.; others Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. Advances in large margin classifiers 1999, 10, 61--74

    1999

  71. [79]

    Random Forests

    Breiman, L. Random Forests . Machine Learning 2001, 45, 5--32

    2001

  72. [80]

    Hinton, G. E. In Machine Learning ; Kodratoff, Y., Michalski, R. S., Eds.; Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco (CA), 1990; pp 555--610

    1990

  73. [81]

    V.; Bowyer, K

    Chawla, N. V.; Bowyer, K. W.; Hall, L. O.; Kegelmeyer, W. P. SMOTE : Synthetic Minority Over -sampling Technique . Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2002, 16, 321--357

    2002

  74. [82]

    A.; Li, S

    He, H.; Bai, Y.; Garcia, E. A.; Li, S. ADASYN : Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning. 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks ( IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence ). 2008; pp 1322--1328

    2008

  75. [83]

    Pasting Small Votes for Classification in Large Databases and On - Line

    Breiman, L. Pasting Small Votes for Classification in Large Databases and On - Line . Machine Learning 1999, 36, 85--103

    1999

  76. [84]

    Van Vleck, J. H. Theory of the Variations in Paramagnetic Anisotropy Among Different Salts of the Iron Group. Phys. Rev. 1932, 41, 208--215

    1932

  77. [85]

    Alexander, E. QD ML. https://github.com/troyvvgroup/qd_ml, 2025

    2025

  78. [86]

    stepping-stones

    Kick, M.; Alexander, E.; Beiersdorfer, A.; Van Voorhis, T. Super-resolution techniques to simulate electronic spectra of large molecular systems. Nature Communications 2024, 15, 8001 mcitethebibliography main.tex0000664000000000000000000013672315015620161011235 0ustar rootroot...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.