Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

GitGoodBench: A Novel Benchmark For Evaluating Agentic Performance On Git

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.22583 v1 pith:Z5G3RV2U submitted 2025-05-28 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords benchmarkgitgoodbenchagentsperformancesamplesversioncomprehensiveevaluating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Benchmarks for Software Engineering (SE) AI agents, most notably SWE-bench, have catalyzed progress in programming capabilities of AI agents. However, they overlook critical developer workflows such as Version Control System (VCS) operations. To address this issue, we present GitGoodBench, a novel benchmark for evaluating AI agent performance on VCS tasks. GitGoodBench covers three core Git scenarios extracted from permissive open-source Python, Java, and Kotlin repositories. Our benchmark provides three datasets: a comprehensive evaluation suite (900 samples), a rapid prototyping version (120 samples), and a training corpus (17,469 samples). We establish baseline performance on the prototyping version of our benchmark using GPT-4o equipped with custom tools, achieving a 21.11% solve rate overall. We expect GitGoodBench to serve as a crucial stepping stone toward truly comprehensive SE agents that go beyond mere programming.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BulkPR-Bench: Benchmarking Queue-Level Governance of Interacting Pull Requests

    cs.SE 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper introduces an execution-validated benchmark for pull-request queue governance and reports that top models reach 66.6% relational delivery yet only 8 of 324 runs deliver an entire queue exactly.

  2. SetupBench: Assessing Software Engineering Agents' Ability to Bootstrap Development Environments

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SetupBench, a 93-instance environment-bootstrap benchmark, finds coding agents succeed on only 34.4-62.4% of setup tasks, with database configuration and repo setup being the hardest.

Pith tools