Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Quantum Simulation of Charge and Exciton Transfer in Multi-mode Models using Engineered Reservoirs

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Adding a second engineered vibrational mode to a trapped-ion simulation of donor–acceptor transfer changes the physics: degenerate modes enhance transfer at large energy gaps, while non-degenerate modes flatten the energy-gap dependence.

desk verdict A genuine two-mode open LvCM experiment with careful calibration, but the reported transfer rates are a finite-time estimator that needs a convergence check before the quantitative claims stand. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22729 v3 pith:GE7RCOZW submitted 2025-05-28 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph

Visal So , Midhuna Duraisamy Suganthi , Mingjian Zhu , Abhishek Menon , George Tomaras , Roman Zhuravel , Han Pu , Peter G. Wolynes
show 2 more authors
José N. Onuchic Guido Pagano
This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords quantumsimulationlinearvibroniccouplingmodeltrappedionsengineeredreservoirschargetransfervibrationallyassistedexcitonmulti-modedynamicsopensystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that a trapped-ion platform can perform an open-system quantum simulation of a two-site, two-mode linear vibronic coupling model, with each vibrational mode damped by its own engineered reservoir, and that the resulting dynamics show qualitative multi-mode effects that single-mode models miss. The authors scan the donor-acceptor energy gap across the strong-coupling charge transfer (CT) regime and the weak-coupling vibrationally assisted exciton transfer (VAET) regime. They find that degenerate vibrational modes enhance CT and VAET rates at large energy gaps, while non-degenerate modes open slow-mode pathways that flatten the rate's dependence on the energy gap, enlarging the window of energy offsets over which transfer is efficient. If correct, this is a scalable, hardware-efficient route to simulating chemically relevant vibronic processes in the non-perturbative intermediate-coupling regime, where perturbative methods fail and classical numerics become hard.

What carries the argument

The central object is a two-mode linear vibronic coupling model (LvCM), whose Hamiltonian $H=V\sigma_x+\frac{\Delta E}{2}\sigma_z+\sum_{i=1}^2\left[\frac{g_i}{2}\sigma_z(a_i+a_i^\dagger)+\omega_i a_i^\dagger a_i\right]$ couples a donor-acceptor spin to two harmonic modes linearly in the mode displacements. The paper opens this system to two independent Markovian reservoirs through Lindblad dissipators with rates $\gamma_i$ and thermal occupations $\bar n_i$ (Eq. 4), and realizes each mode as a radial tilt mode of a two-ion chain with mode-selective sympathetic cooling. The analytic spine of the paper is Fermi's golden rule: CT resonances at $\Delta E\approx \ell_1\omega_1+\ell_2\omega_2$ (Eq. 2) and VAET resonances at $\Delta E\approx\sqrt{(\ell_1\omega_1+\ell_2\omega_2)^2-(2V)^2}$ (Eq. 3), with the second-order VAET rate expression (Eq. C8) isolating the interference between the two time-ordered $\omega_1+\omega_2$ pathways. The experimental transfer rates use a finite-time corrected definition, $k_T=\frac{\int_0^{t_{\rm sim}}P_D(t)\,dt}{\int_0^{t_{\rm sim}}t\,P_D(t)\,dt}-\frac{2}{t_{\rm sim}}$, to compare with master-equation numerics.

What would settle it

Increase motional dephasing on one vibrational mode only and measure the VAET peak at $\Delta E\approx\sqrt{(\omega_1+\omega_2)^2-(2V)^2}$; the interference interpretation predicts the mixed two-phonon pathway loses roughly half of its enhancement relative to the $2\omega_1$ and $2\omega_2$ peaks, while an unchanged peak height would falsify the coherent-addition claim. A complementary calculation would set $\gamma_2=0$ in Eq. (4) and confirm that the observed non-degenerate smooth CT spectrum disappears without the second reservoir.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that adding one more vibrational mode, with its own independently engineered dissipative reservoir, qualitatively changes linear vibronic coupling dynamics in ways no single-mode model can reproduce. The electronic donor-acceptor system is encoded in a $^{171}$Yb$^+$ hyperfine qubit, the two vibrations are the two radial tilt modes of a $^{171}$Yb$^+$--$^{172}$Yb$^+$ chain, and each mode is damped separately by sympathetic cooling through the $^{172}$Yb$^+$ optical qubit. From time-resolved donor population $P_D(t)$, the authors extract transfer rates over a range of energy gaps $\Delta E$. In the CT regime ($g_i \gtrsim \omega_i$), degenerate modes ($\omega_1=\omega_2$) extend the exothermic plateau to $\Delta E\approx 4\omega$ and enhance the high-gap resonances at $\Delta E\approx \ell\omega$, whereas non-degenerate modes ($\omega_1>\omega_2$) give a smooth rate spectrum with reduced sensitivity to $\Delta E$. In the VAET regime ($g_i\ll\omega_i$), phonon combinations $\omega_1+\omega_2$, $2\omega_1$, and $2\omega_2$ each assist transfer at their own resonances; the mixed $\omega_1+\omega_2$ pathway consists of two time-ordered contributions that interfere constructively, giving an approximately twofold rate enhancement over single-mode two-phonon transfer that persists under dissipation. The paper argues these are genuine signatures of multi-mode non-perturbative transfer, not artifacts of parameter choice.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the engineered sympathetic cooling behaves as two independent, memoryless (Markovian) reservoirs, one per vibrational mode, with cooling rates much smaller than the vibrational frequencies and thermal energies, and that the two tilt modes used as vibrations are effectively independent of the other radial trap modes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single-mode models understate transfer at large energy gaps: in the degenerate CT case the two-mode exothermic plateau extends from $\Delta E\approx 3\omega$ to $\Delta E\approx 4\omega$, and the high-gap resonances leave less population on the donor than their single-mode counterparts.
  • Non-degenerate mode combinations make transfer less sensitive to the donor-acceptor energy gap, so molecular systems with a spread of vibrational frequencies should tolerate greater energetic disorder without losing transfer efficiency.
  • The constructive interference between the two time-ordered $\omega_1+\omega_2$ pathways survives dissipation, meaning engineered reservoirs can act as resources that shape transfer pathways rather than merely as decoherence.
  • The same ion-laser couplings and sympathetic-cooling methods extend to three or more vibrational modes and multiple electronic sites, and the paper's numerics show the qualitative two-mode features persist in three-mode models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper, raising the thermal occupation $\bar n_i$ of one reservoir should test whether the $\omega_1+\omega_2$ peak is genuinely coherent: thermal populations add rates rather than amplitudes, so the twofold enhancement should erode as $\bar n_i$ grows.
  • Going beyond the paper, the claim that non-degenerate spectra cannot be reproduced by any single-mode parameter choice could be sharpened into a quantitative model-selection test: fit single-mode parameters to the full non-degenerate rate curve and compare goodness of fit under identical decoherence assumptions.
  • Going beyond the paper, the results suggest an engineering heuristic for photovoltaic materials: adding a slow, weakly coupled vibrational mode acts as an energy-gap buffer that flattens the transfer-rate profile against energetic disorder, a design consequence the paper does not itself derive.
  • Going beyond the paper, the analytic second-order rate expression for the $\omega_1+\omega_2$ pathway implies a continuous tunable knob: varying $g_1/g_2$ and $\gamma_1/\gamma_2$ should change the relative height of the mixed-phonon resonance in a predictable way that the paper's few parameter sets only partially sample.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports a trapped-ion quantum simulation of a two-site, two-mode linear vibronic coupling model with independently engineered reservoirs. The authors measure donor population dynamics over a range of energy gaps, compare them with numerical solutions of the Lindblad master equation (Eq. 4), and characterize the transfer behavior in the CT and VAET regimes. They report that degenerate modes enhance transfer rates at large energy gaps and that non-degenerate modes smooth the energy-gap dependence, and they attribute a two-fold enhancement at the ω1+ω2 resonance to constructive interference of two pathways. The paper includes appendices with perturbative FGR analysis, NIBA solution, and extensions to three modes.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable experimental demonstration of a multi-mode open-system vibronic model with independently tunable dissipation, going beyond previous single-mode simulators. The numerical benchmarking of the experimental data against Eq. (4) is a strength: the simulations independently solve the master equation with calibrated parameters, and the qualitative features (CT window extension, smooth spectra for non-degenerate modes, VAET resonances) are reproduced. The paper also provides a perturbative derivation (Appendix E) that predicts the constructive-interference enhancement. However, the main quantitative conclusions rely on a finite-time rate estimator whose convergence is not established, which tempers the strength of the claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (6)] The rate estimator defined in Eq. (6) is not a well-defined physical rate when the steady-state donor population P_SS = lim_{t→∞} P_D(t) is nonzero: for large t_sim, the first term in Eq. (6) scales as 2/t_sim, so k_T approaches an O(1/t_sim^2) correction and does not converge to a positive rate. The reported t_sim = 2–8 ms (24–65 fast-mode cycles) is not accompanied by any convergence test, and Appendix C concedes that values from Eq. (5) differ from exponential-fit rates when P_SS > 0. Because the quantitative claims (e.g., extension of the CT window to ΔE ≈ 4ω in Fig. 3A and the approximate two-fold enhancement in Fig. 5C) are based on this metric, the manuscript should either demonstrate that the conclusions are independent of t_sim (e.g., a t_sim scan), re-analyze the data using exponential-fit rates, or explicitly reframe the metric as a finite-time transfer efficiency measure and soften the rate-based language.
  2. [CT regime, Fig. 3A/D] The statement that the two-mode spectra 'cannot be obtained by tuning the parameters of a single-mode model' is stronger than the presented evidence. The authors compare with a single-mode model using fixed parameter choices (as in Fig. 3A blue curve), but do not perform a systematic search over single-mode parameters (e.g., larger γ or different g/ω). A single-mode model with increased dissipation might also produce a smooth spectrum similar to Fig. 3D. The claim should be supported by a parameter search or qualified as 'with parameters in the same physical regime.'
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure captions (Figs. 3A, 3D, 4A, 5A, 5C)] The figure captions refer to 'the definition in Eq. (5)', while Methods state that the corrected finite-time estimator Eq. (6) is used; the captions should cite Eq. (6) and reserve Eq. (5) for the ideal infinite-time limit.
  2. [Appendix E] The resonance energies E_dual and E_i_single are defined with V, but consistent with Eq. (3) they should involve 2V, i.e., sqrt((ω1+ω2)^2 - (2V)^2) and sqrt((2ω_i)^2 - (2V)^2); the factor of 2 is missing.
  3. [Data availability] The data availability statement could be improved by providing a persistent repository link or accession number rather than only 'available upon request.'
  4. [Introduction, novelty claim] The statement that this is the 'first trapped-ion simulation in which unitary spin-phonon couplings and mode-selective dissipation are independently programmed' should be qualified relative to Refs. [19] and [21], which also use engineered dissipation in trapped-ion simulators, so that the precise novelty (multi-mode LvCM with two independent reservoirs) is clear.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the two-mode enhancement claims rest on experimental data and independent master-equation numerics, with only a non-load-bearing rate-estimator caveat.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental observations of donor population dynamics on a trapped-ion simulator, compared with numerical integration of the standard Lindblad master equation (Eq. 4), rather than derivations that assume the target rates. The resonance conditions in Eqs. (2) and (3) follow by direct algebra from the Hamiltonian via Fermi's golden rule, and the two-fold interference enhancement in Fig. 5C is derived in Appendix E from second-order perturbation theory (Eqs. E1-E2) without any fitted rate parameter. The numerical curves include decoherence rates (gamma_z, gamma_im) fitted to the same data in Appendix B, but these are experimental-imperfection parameters applied equally to single-mode and two-mode simulations; the enhancement claims are also present in the raw P_D(t) data and in the independently derived perturbation theory, so no claim reduces to the fit. Self-citations (Ref. [20], [23], [34]) are methodological: the trap setup, calibration procedure, and rate estimator are cited to prior work, but the new physical claim rests on the new two-mode measurements and on master-equation numerics whose parameters are independently calibrated (Table I). Appendix C1 explicitly concedes that for nonzero steady-state donor population the Eq. (5)/(6) rate metric differs from exponential-fit rates; this is a validity caveat about the chosen finite-time estimator, not a circular step, because the paper consistently applies this metric to both experiment and simulation and does not present it as an independently measured exponential rate. I find no load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard open-quantum-system modeling of the trapped-ion setup and on measured and calibrated Hamiltonian parameters. No new physical entities are introduced. The main fitted quantities are small decoherence rates (gamma_z, gamma_im) and an empirical line-broadening correction used in perturbative analysis; none of these by themselves generate the reported effects, which are also visible in the raw donor population dynamics.

free parameters (3)
  • Spin dephasing rate gamma_z = 2*pi * 7 Hz
    Obtained by comparing numerical master-equation results with experimental transfer-rate data (Appendix B); included in all main-text numerical curves and broadens the spectra.
  • Motional dephasing rate gamma_im = 2*pi * 80 Hz
    Same comparison fit; applied to both vibrational modes and affects the resolution and sharpness of transfer resonances in the numerical benchmarks.
  • CT line-broadening correction factor C(g/omega) = C grows roughly as (g/omega)^2; C ~ 4*pi at g/omega = 2.5
    Empirically determined by matching Fermi's golden rule rates to master-equation dynamics in the weak-electronic-coupling CT analysis (Appendix C1, Fig. S1). Not used in the main non-perturbative claims but is a fitted correction within the perturbative interpretation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The open-system dynamics are governed by a Markovian Lindblad master equation with independent amplitude damping for each mode (Eq. 4), valid when gamma_i << omega_i and gamma_i << k_B T_i.
    Invoked in the main text after Eq. (4) and relied on for all numerical comparisons; the engineered sympathetic cooling is assumed to produce this form of dissipation (Appendix D).
  • domain assumption The two radial tilt modes used as vibrational modes are independent harmonic oscillators, with off-resonant couplings to the other radial collective modes negligible because frequency separations are at least about 2*pi*140 kHz.
    Methods, Experimental setup: off-resonant spin-phonon interactions proportional to g_j/(mu_i - omega_trap,j) are neglected; if crosstalk is not negligible, the implemented Hamiltonian is not Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption The initial state is the donor electronic state with both modes in displaced thermal states at temperature k_B T_i, prepared by sideband cooling and spin-dependent displacement pulses.
    Methods, Experimental sequence; the state preparation is assumed to be faithful and the initial thermal phonon numbers nbar_0,i are matched to nbar_i.
  • domain assumption Lowest-order perturbation theory (Fermi's golden rule and NIBA) is sufficient to explain the positions and relative heights of the transfer resonances in the weak-coupling regimes.
    Appendices C and D; the main non-perturbative claims do not depend on these, but the interpretation of the VAET peaks does.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Simulation of Charge and Exciton Transfer in Multi-mode Models using Engineered Reservoirs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GE7RCOZW

@misc{pith2026250522729,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Simulation of Charge and Exciton Transfer in Multi-mode Models using Engineered Reservoirs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GE7RCOZW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22729}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum simulation offers a route to study open-system molecular dynamics in non-perturbative regimes by programming the interactions among electronic, vibrational, and environmental degrees of freedom on similar energy scales. Trapped-ion systems possess this capability, with their native spins, phonons, and tunable dissipation integrated within a single platform. Here, we demonstrate an open-system quantum simulation of charge and exciton transfer in a multi-mode linear vibronic coupling model. Employing tailored spin-phonon interactions alongside reservoir engineering techniques, we emulate a system with two dissipative vibrational modes coupled to donor and acceptor electronic sites and follow its non-equilibrium dynamics. We continuously tune the system from the charge transfer (CT) regime to the vibrationally assisted exciton transfer (VAET) regime by controlling the vibronic coupling strengths. We find that degenerate modes enhance CT and VAET rates at large energy gaps, while non-degenerate modes activate slow-mode pathways that reduce the energy-gap dependence, thus enlarging the window for efficient transfer. These results show that the presence of one additional vibration introduces interfering vibrationally assisted pathways and reshapes non-perturbative quantum excitation transfer. Our work establishes a scalable and hardware-efficient route to simulating chemically relevant, many-mode vibronic processes with engineered environments, guiding the design of next-generation organic photovoltaics and molecular electronics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22729 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: C, we observe three additional resonances beyond the two existing resonances provided by the fast vibra￾tional mode for the two-mode case. These peaks corre￾spond to the processes involving vibrational energy in￾puts of ω2, 2ω2, and ω1 + ω2. It is worth noting that, in…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Experimental Realization of Thermal Reservoirs with Tunable Temperature in a Trapped-Ion Spin-Boson Simulator

    quant-ph 2025-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A trapped-ion protocol that balances controlled heating and cooling realizes thermal baths with independently tunable temperature and dissipation rate, demonstrated in spin-boson charge- and exciton-transfer simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    E. C. Behrman, G. A. Jongeward, and P. G. Wolynes, A monte carlo approach for the real time dynamics of tunneling systems in condensed phases, The Journal of Chemical Physics79, 6277 (1983)

    work page 1983

  2. [2]

    Tanimura and P

    Y. Tanimura and P. G. Wolynes, The interplay of tunnel- ing, resonance, and dissipation in quantum barrier cross- ing: A numerical study, The Journal of Chemical Physics 96, 8485 (1992)

    work page 1992

  3. [3]

    Kundu and N

    S. Kundu and N. Makri, Intramolecular vibrations in ex- citation energy transfer: Insights from real-time path in- tegral calculations, Annual review of physical chemistry 73, 349 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    G. D. Scholes, A. Olaya-Castro, S. Mukamel, A. Kirran- der, K.-K. Ni, G. J. Hedley, and N. L. Frank, The quan- tum information science challenge for chemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters16, 1376 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Zhang, S

    C. Zhang, S. Kundu, N. Makri, M. Gruebele, and P. G. Wolynes, Quantum information scrambling and chemi- cal reactions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2321668121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Fassioli, R

    F. Fassioli, R. Dinshaw, P. C. Arpin, and G. D. Scholes, Photosynthetic light harvesting: excitons and coherence, Journal of The Royal Society Interface11, 20130901 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    A. A. Bakulin, R. Lovrincic, X. Yu, O. Selig, H. J. Bakker, Y. L. A. Rezus, P. K. Nayak, A. Fonari, V. Coropceanu, J.-L. Br´ edas, and D. Cahen, Mode- selective vibrational modulation of charge transport in organic electronic devices, Nature Communications6, 10.1038/ncomms8880 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms8880 2015

  8. [8]

    M. Kang, H. Nuomin, S. N. Chowdhury, J. L. Yuly, K. Sun, J. Whitlow, J. Valdiviezo, Z. Zhang, P. Zhang, D. N. Beratan, and K. R. Brown, Seeking a quan- tum advantage with trapped-ion quantum simulations of condensed-phase chemical dynamics, Nature Reviews Chemistry8, 340 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Johnson, N

    A. Johnson, N. Levinger, D. Kliner, K. Tominaga, and P. Barbara, Ultrafast experiments on the role of vi- brational modes in electron transfer, Pure and Applied Chemistry64, 8 (1992). 10

    1992

  2. [10]

    Rather, B

    S. Rather, B. Fu, B. Kudisch, and G. Scholes, Interplay of vibrational wavepackets during an ultrafast electron transfer reaction, Nature Chemistry13, 70 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    E. A. Arsenault, A. J. Schile, D. T. Limmer, and G. R. Fleming, Vibronic coupling in energy transfer dynamics and two-dimensional electronic–vibrational spectra, The Journal of Chemical Physics155, 054201 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Dutta, D

    R. Dutta, D. G. A. Cabral, N. Lyu, N. P. Vu, Y. Wang, B. Allen, X. Dan, R. G. Corti˜ nas, P. Khazaei, M. Sch¨ afer, A. C. C. d. Albornoz, S. E. Smart, S. Nie, M. H. De- voret, D. A. Mazziotti, P. Narang, C. Wang, J. D. Whit- field, A. K. Wilson, H. P. Hendrickson, D. A. Lidar,...

    2024

  5. [13]

    Sparrow, E

    C. Sparrow, E. Mart ´ ın-L´ opez, N. Maraviglia, A. Neville, C. Harrold, J. Carolan, Y. N. Joglekar, T. Hashimoto, N. Matsuda, J. L. O’Brien, D. P. Tew, and A. Laing, Sim- ulating the vibrational quantum dynamics of molecules using photonics, Nature557, 660 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    D. J. Gorman, B. Hemmerling, E. Megidish, S. A. Moeller, P. Schindler, M. Sarovar, and H. Haeffner, Engineering vibrationally assisted energy transfer in a trapped-ion quantum simulator, Phys. Rev. X8, 011038 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    C. H. Valahu, V. C. Olaya-Agudelo, R. J. MacDonell, T. Navickas, A. D. Rao, M. J. Millican, J. B. P´ erez- S´ anchez, J. Yuen-Zhou, M. J. Biercuk, C. Hempel, T. R. Tan, and I. Kassal, Direct observation of geometric-phase interference in dynamics around a conical intersection,...

    2023

  8. [16]

    Whitlow, Z

    J. Whitlow, Z. Jia, Y. Wang, C. Fang, J. Kim, and K. R. Brown, Quantum simulation of conical intersections us- ing trapped ions, Nature Chemistry15, 1509 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    MacDonell, T

    R. MacDonell, T. Navickas, T. Wohlers-Reichel, C. Valahu, A. Rao, M. Millican, M. Currington, M. Bier- cuk, T. Tan, C. Hempel, and I. Kassal, Predicting molec- ular vibronic spectra using time-domain analog quantum simulation, Chemical Science14(2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    K. Sun, C. Fang, M. Kang, Z. Zhang, P. Zhang, D. N. Be- ratan, K. R. Brown, and J. Kim, Quantum simulation of polarized light-induced electron transfer with a trapped- ion qutrit system, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters14, 6071 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Maier, T

    C. Maier, T. Brydges, P. Jurcevic, N. Trautmann, C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Environment-assisted quantum transport in a 10- qubit network, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 050501 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    V. So, M. D. Suganthi, A. Menon, M. Zhu, R. Zhuravel, H. Pu, P. G. Wolynes, J. N. Onuchic, and G. Pagano, Trapped-ion quantum simulation of electron transfer models with tunable dissipation, Science Advances10, eads8011 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    K. Sun, M. Kang, H. Nuomin, G. Schwartz, D. N. Be- ratan, K. R. Brown, and J. Kim, Quantum simulation of spin-boson models with structured bath, Nature Com- munications16, 4042 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Navickas, R

    T. Navickas, R. J. MacDonell, C. H. Valahu, V. C. Olaya- Agudelo, F. Scuccimarra, M. J. Millican, V. G. Matsos, H. L. Nourse, A. D. Rao, M. J. Biercuk, C. Hempel, I. Kassal, and T. R. Tan, Experimental quantum sim- ulation of chemical dynamics, Journal of the American Chemical...

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    Pagano, W

    G. Pagano, W. Adamczyk, and V. So, Fundamentals of trapped ions and quantum simulation of chemical dy- namics, arXiv:2505.20412 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Renger, M

    T. Renger, M. E.-A. Madjet, M. Schmidt am Busch, J. Adolphs, and F. M¨ uh, Structure-based modeling of en- ergy transfer in photosynthesis, Photosynthesis Research 116, 367 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    L. Chen, P. Shenai, F. Zheng, A. Somoza, and Y. Zhao, Optimal energy transfer in light-harvesting systems, Molecules20, 15224 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Schlawin, M

    F. Schlawin, M. Gessner, A. Buchleitner, T. Sch¨ atz, and S. S. Skourtis, Continuously parametrized quantum simulation of molecular electron-transfer reactions, PRX Quantum2, 010314 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Z.-Z. Li, L. Ko, Z. Yang, M. Sarovar, and K. B. Whaley, Unraveling excitation energy transfer assisted by collec- tive behaviors of vibrations, New Journal of Physics23, 073012 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    D. V. Matyushov, Reorganization energy of electron transfer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25, 7589 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    J. N. Onuchic, Effect of friction on electron transfer: The two reaction coordinate case, The Journal of Chemical Physics86, 3925 (1987)

    1987

  22. [30]

    P. F. Barbara, T. J. Meyer, and M. A. Ratner, Contem- porary issues in electron transfer research, The Journal of Physical Chemistry100, 13148 (1996)

    1996

  23. [31]

    E. R. Barthel, I. B. Martini, and B. J. Schwartz, How does the solvent control electron transfer? experimental and theoretical studies of the simplest charge transfer re- action, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B105, 12230 (2001)

    2001

  24. [32]

    Hsu, Reorganization energies and spectral densi- ties for electron transfer problems in charge transport materials, Phys

    C.-P. Hsu, Reorganization energies and spectral densi- ties for electron transfer problems in charge transport materials, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22, 21630 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    S. S. Skourtis, A. J. R. Da Silva, W. Bialek, and J. N. Onuchic, New look at the primary charge separation in bacterial photosynthesis, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry96, 8034 (1992)

    1992

  26. [34]

    D. F. Padilla, V. So, A. Menon, R. Zhuravel, H. Pu, and G. Pagano, Delocalized excitation transfer in open quantum systems with long-range interactions, arXiv:2502.04383 doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.04383 (2025)

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    A. Garg, J. N. Onuchic, and V. Ambegaokar, Effect of friction on electron transfer in biomolecules, The Journal of Chemical Physics83, 4491 (1985)

    1985

  28. [36]

    Lemmer, C

    A. Lemmer, C. Cormick, D. Tamascelli, T. Schaetz, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, A trapped-ion simulator for spin-boson models with structured environments, New Journal of Physics20, 073002 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Schneider, D

    C. Schneider, D. Porras, and T. Schaetz, Experimental quantum simulations of many-body physics with trapped ions, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 024401 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    Zhang, M

    C. Zhang, M. Gruebele, D. E. Logan, and P. G. Wolynes, Surface crossing and energy flow in many-dimensional quantum systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2221690120 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Macridin, P

    A. Macridin, P. Spentzouris, J. Amundson, and R. Harnik, Digital quantum computation of fermion- boson interacting systems, Phys. Rev. A98, 042312 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    M. B. Plenio, J. Almeida, and S. F. Huelga, Origin of long-lived oscillations in 2d-spectra of a quantum vi- bronic model: Electronic versus vibrational coherence, 11 The Journal of Chemical Physics139, 235102 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    Tiwari, W

    V. Tiwari, W. K. Peters, and D. M. Jonas, Electronic resonance with anticorrelated pigment vibrations drives photosynthetic energy transfer outside the adiabatic framework, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences110, 1203 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissi- pative two-state system, Rev. Mod. Phys.59, 1 (1987)

    1987

  35. [43]

    Debecker, J

    B. Debecker, J. Martin, and F. Damanet, Controlling matter phases beyond markov, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140403 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    S. F. Huelga, A. Rivas, and M. B. Plenio, Non- markovianity-assisted steady state entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 160402 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    Addis, G

    C. Addis, G. Brebner, P. Haikka, and S. Maniscalco, Co- herence trapping and information backflow in dephasing qubits, Phys. Rev. A89, 024101 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    N. A. Kamar, D. A. Paz, and M. F. Maghrebi, Spin- boson model under dephasing: Markovian versus non- markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. B110, 075126 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    L. Jiao, H. Pu, and J.-H. An, Protecting spin squeezing from decoherence (2025), arXiv:2503.05016 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    M. Zhu, V. So, G. Pagano, and H. Pu, Dissipation- assisted steady-state entanglement engineering based on electron transfer models (2025), arXiv:2504.02101 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Foss-Feig, G

    M. Foss-Feig, G. Pagano, A. C. Potter, and N. Y. Yao, Progress in trapped-ion quantum simula- tion, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-032822- 045619 (2024)

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    Mueller, T

    N. Mueller, T. Wang, O. Katz, Z. Davoudi, and M. Cetina, Quantum computing universal thermaliza- tion dynamics in a (2+1)d lattice gauge theory (2024), arXiv:2408.00069 [quant-ph]

    2024

  43. [51]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    S. J. Jang and B. Mennucci, Delocalized excitons in nat- ural light-harvesting complexes, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035003 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    A. J. Sneyd, T. Fukui, D. Paleˇ cek, S. Prodhan, I. Wag- ner, Y. Zhang, J. Sung, S. M. Collins, T. J. A. Slater, Z. Andaji-Garmaroudi, L. R. MacFarlane, J. D. Garcia- Hernandez, L. Wang, G. R. Whittell, J. M. Hodgkiss, K. Chen, D. Beljonne, I. Manners, R. H. Friend, and A. Rao...

    2021

  46. [54]

    M. I. Collins, F. Campaioli, M. J. Y. Tayebjee, J. H. Cole, and D. R. McCamey, Quintet formation, exchange fluctuations, and the role of stochastic resonance in sin- glet fission, Communications Physics6, 64 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Campaioli, A

    F. Campaioli, A. Pagano, D. Jaschke, and S. Mon- tangero, Optimization of ultrafast singlet fission in one- dimensional rings towards unit efficiency, PRX Energy 3, 043003 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Kn¨ orzer, T

    J. Kn¨ orzer, T. Shi, E. Demler, and J. I. Cirac, Spin- holstein models in trapped-ion systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 120404 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    A. D. Somoza, O. Marty, J. Lim, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Dissipation-assisted matrix product fac- torization, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 100502 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip 2: A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications184, 1234 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    Fl¨ uhmann, T

    C. Fl¨ uhmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevit- sky, K. Mehta, and J. P. Home, Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator, Nature566, 513 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    2007

  53. [61]

    Dekker, Noninteracting-blip approximation for a two- level system coupled to a heat bath, Phys

    H. Dekker, Noninteracting-blip approximation for a two- level system coupled to a heat bath, Phys. Rev. A35, 1436 (1987) Appendix A: System calibration As described in the main text, we have full control over the system parameters and the properties of the reser- voirs. Prior ...

    1987

  54. [62]

    W eak electronic coupling Throughout the main text, we focus our investiga- tion of the two-mode CT process in the strong electronic coupling regime (|V| ∼λ i/4), where there is no ana- lytical description for the rate of the transfer dynam- ics. However, in the weak electroni...

  55. [63]

    njI (njI −1) (2ϵ+ω j)2ω2 j δnjF ,njI −2 + (njI +1)(njI +2) (2ϵ−ω j)2ω2 j δnjF ,njI +2 # L(EIF ,2γj) + g1g2 4 2

    W eak vibronic coupling (V AET) To gain insights into the V AET regime, we shall em- ploy a similar perturbative analysis of the two-mode model in the weak vibronic coupling regime (g j ≪ω j) [14, 27]. The unperturbed system is now the uncoupled, non-displaced vibronic system,...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.