Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 60 references

On the spectra of holographic QFTs on constant curvature manifolds

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Curved-space holographic particle spectra split by the sign of curvature: discrete on AdS4, continuous on dS4.

desk verdict Solid new formalism and a striking universal dS threshold, but the 'always discrete' claim for AdS4 slices rests on an unexamined singular reduction at the A-bounce. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23366 v1 pith:W2DY4QVT submitted 2025-05-29 hep-th gr-qc

Ahmad Ghodsi , Elias Kiritsis , Parisa Mashayekhi , Francesco Nitti This is my paper
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords holographicQFToncurvedspacetimeEinstein-dilatongravitydeSitterspectrumanti-deSchrödingerquantizationgauge-invariantfluctuationsHiguchiboundRGflows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes linearized fluctuations around five-dimensional Einstein-dilaton backgrounds that are holographic duals of quantum field theories on four-dimensional de Sitter or anti-de Sitter spacetime. It claims a model-independent dichotomy: for negative curvature (AdS4 slices) the particle spectra are always discrete, while for positive curvature (dS4 slices) they always contain a continuous part beginning at $m^2 = 9/(4\alpha^2)$, where $\alpha$ is the slice radius. The argument works by reducing the gauge-invariant scalar and tensor perturbations to one-dimensional Schrödinger problems whose potentials inherit universal asymptotic forms from the background geometry. If true, this fixes the representation content of the continuous sector, rules out perturbative instabilities there, and tells concrete model builders where to look for stable discrete states. In a polynomial-dilaton model with two UV fixed points the paper finds no discrete spectrum and no perturbative instabilities.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair of one-dimensional Schrödinger equations obtained after separating variables on the four-dimensional slice, with potentials $V_g$ and $V_s$ built from the background scale factor and dilaton. In the conformal coordinate $y$, the graviton potential is $V_g = B'^2 - B''$, with $B = \tfrac{3}{2}A$, and the scalar potential is fixed by the background and the four-dimensional mass $m$. The universal spectral statements follow from the asymptotic form of these potentials: negative-curvature backgrounds give two boundaries with $1/y^2$ walls (a box, hence discrete levels), while positive-curvature backgrounds give one asymptotically AdS5 boundary and a regular endpoint where both potentials tend to $9/(4\alpha^2)$, so plane-wave-normalizable solutions exist only above that threshold. The paper also treats separately the scalar and vector Laplacian zero modes for which the standard transverse-longitudinal decomposition breaks down.

What would settle it

Build or find an Einstein-dilaton potential satisfying the paper's assumptions whose positive-curvature RG flow has a different infrared endpoint (for instance an exponential or singular scale factor) and show the resulting Schrödinger potential does not asymptote to $9/(4\alpha^2)$; alternatively, in any allowed positive-curvature model, produce a normalizable eigenmode with $m^2 < 9/(4\alpha^2)$, which would contradict the claimed threshold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the mass spectrum of gauge-invariant spin-0 and spin-2 excitations of a holographic QFT on a constant-curvature manifold is dictated by the sign of the curvature through the infrared geometry. For AdS4 slices, every acceptable background has two UV boundaries and the Schrödinger potentials confine, so the spectrum is purely discrete. For dS4 slices, every acceptable background has one UV boundary and a regular IR endpoint whose scale factor behaves as $a(y) \sim e^{y/\alpha}$; the potentials asymptote to the constant $9/(4\alpha^2)$, so a continuous principal-series spectrum starts exactly at $m^2 = 9/(4\alpha^2)$, above the Higuchi bound for gravitons and stable for both spins. For the specific polynomial model, solving the Schrödinger problems numerically yields no discrete eigenstates and no mode violating the relevant stability bounds.

Load-bearing premise

The 'always' statements rest on the imported classification that every allowed positive-curvature background has a regular IR endpoint with scale factor $a(y) \sim e^{y/\alpha}$ and every allowed negative-curvature background has two UV boundaries with $a(y) \sim 1/y$ at each end; if other IR asymptotics are possible for some bulk potentials, the universal dichotomy could fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On de Sitter slices, every state in the continuous spectrum lies in the principal series of SO(1,4), so no perturbative instability can arise in that sector.
  • Complementary-series states, if they exist at all, can only appear as discrete eigenvalues below the $9/(4\alpha^2)$ threshold; the paper leaves their existence as an open model-dependent question.
  • On anti-de Sitter slices, all spin-0 and spin-2 towers are discrete, which applies in particular to holographic conformal interfaces with two boundaries.
  • In the polynomial model studied here, there are no discrete dS states and no violating modes, so the curved RG-flow backgrounds in that model are perturbatively stable.
  • At negative curvature the lightest graviton can be lighter than the lightest scalar, unlike the flat-slice pattern, which may matter for composite-gravity scenarios.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Schrödinger machinery, with the normalizable boundary condition replaced by a non-normalizable one, directly yields holographic correlation functions on dS4 and AdS4; the paper notes this but does not perform the computation.
  • If the accepted background classification is complete, the dichotomy should persist for every two-derivative Einstein-dilaton theory; a numerical scan across families of potentials with different IR asymptotics would be a cheap test.
  • For confining holographic theories on positive curvature, phase transitions as curvature varies could be diagnosed by watching whether discrete states descend below the continuous threshold; the paper's spectrum calculation gives the tool but does not apply it to that class.
  • The interface interpretation suggests the discrete AdS4 towers describe both bulk modes on each side and interface-localized modes; extracting the interface spectrum needs a refined boundary-problem setup not given here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies linearized scalar and tensor fluctuations around five-dimensional Einstein-dilaton backgrounds with constant-curvature four-dimensional slices. It constructs gauge-invariant variables, separates the fluctuation equations into one-dimensional Schrödinger-type problems, and derives universal spectral statements: for negative slice curvature the particle spectrum is always discrete, and for positive curvature there is always a continuous component beginning at m^2 = (9/4)α^{-2}. The paper also solves the spectral problem numerically for a polynomial dilaton potential with two maxima, finding for positive curvature no discrete states and no perturbative instabilities, and for negative curvature discrete towers whose lowest masses are computed.

Significance. If the universal claims are correct, the paper provides a model-independent characterization of holographic spectra on curved manifolds: no continuous spectrum on AdS4 slices, and a principal-series continuum above the dS4 threshold with stability of the continuous sector. The technical apparatus is substantial: the paper identifies the physical degrees of freedom, gives explicit gauge-invariant equations, treats the special zero modes carefully in Appendix D, solves the exact AdS5 case analytically as a warm-up, and provides numerical spectra for a concrete potential. The spectral predictions are not fitted; they follow from the two-derivative action and from background asymptotics, and the concrete model yields checkable quantitative predictions. However, the universality statements currently outrun what the derivation proves: there is an unhandled singular locus in the scalar reduction that affects the negative-curvature discreteness claim, and the positive-curvature claim is stated more broadly in the abstract than the body of the paper appears to justify.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eqs. (4.27)-(4.32)] The scalar reduction is singular in the mass range that is essential for the negative-curvature claim. In every two-boundary AdS-sliced background of Section 7, A'(y)=0 at the A-bounce while Φ0'(y)≠0, so z=Φ0'/A' diverges there and vanishes at the two UV boundaries. Hence for any m^2<4/α^2, which includes all stable AdS4 scalars above the BF bound, z^2 crosses the value 12-3α^2m^2, and D=9m^2+12κ-κz^2 has two interior zeros. The coefficients A and B in Eqs. (4.28)-(4.29), the prefactor h in Eq. (4.30), and the potential Vs in Eq. (4.32) all contain inverse powers of D, so the one-dimensional Schrödinger problem has unregulated interior singular points. The manuscript neither identifies these points nor imposes conditions at them, and numerical shooting in Section 7 can miss solutions whose behavior is controlled at these singularities. The 'always discrete' conclusion for negative curvature is therefore not established by the present derivation; the authors should either work with the full first-order system (3.53)-(3.55) and show that the singularities are removable, or prove that no physical modes exist in the singular regime.
  2. [Abstract and Section 1.1] The abstract claims that for positive curvature the spectra 'always' have a continuous component starting at m^2=9/(4α^2). However, Section 1.1 states that for holographically acceptable positive-curvature backgrounds in which the dilaton runs to Φ(y)→+∞, the Schrödinger potentials are qualitatively those of flat slicing and have discrete, gapped spectra. If that statement is correct, the universal claim is false; if the paper means the claim only for type-III regular-IR-endpoint solutions such as those studied numerically in Section 8, the scope must be stated in the abstract and in Section 1.2. The manuscript must either prove the existence of the continuous component for the Φ→∞ endpoint case or restrict the universality claim accordingly.
  3. [Section 8.2, Eqs. (8.6)-(8.9)] The numerical conclusion that there are no normalizable scalar modes below m^2=9/(4α^2) is obtained from the same reduced equation (4.31)-(4.32). For κ>0, the denominator D=9m^2+12κ-κz^2 vanishes when z^2=3α^2m^2+12, which lies above 12; the paper does not show that z^2 stays below this value for the backgrounds considered, nor does it specify how the singular point is treated in the shooting procedure. Since the existence of discrete complementary-series states is one of the open questions highlighted in Section 1.2, the 'no discrete spectrum' result should be made robust to this possible singularity.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (4.30)] The symbol e h(y) appears where the text elsewhere uses \tilde h(y); this notational inconsistency should be fixed and the function defined once.
  2. [Section 5.3, Eqs. (5.14)-(5.15)] The stability condition for AdS is stated as Re(ν)≠0 in Eq. (5.14), but the equivalent mass condition in Eq. (5.15) is m^2≥3κ/4, which allows ν=0, the BF-saturating value; please reconcile these statements.
  3. [Section 1.1, positive-curvature paragraph] The remark that potentials for Φ(y)→+∞ are 'not very different, qualitatively' from flat slicing is too terse to support the conclusion that the spectrum is discrete; please provide the asymptotic form of the potentials for that endpoint case or label the statement as a conjecture.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectral predictions follow from the action and background asymptotics; the self-cited background classification is an independent input rather than an output.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the central universal claims are obtained by deriving gauge-invariant fluctuation equations from the two-derivative Einstein-dilaton action (2.1), separating variables in Section 4, and reading the Schrödinger-potential asymptotics from the near-boundary/IR expansions (2.24)-(2.36); no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no quantity is defined in terms of the spectral output. The numerical spectra of Sections 7 and 8 are applications of this formalism to the polynomial potential (7.1), not inputs. The background classification (one UV boundary plus regular IR endpoint for positive curvature; two UV boundaries with an A-bounce for negative curvature) is indeed imported from self-cited references [22,26,28,30], and it is load-bearing for the word 'always'. However, it is an independent, parameter-free ODE classification whose assumptions (two-derivative gravity, stated asymptotics) do not include the spectral discreteness or threshold claims of the present paper, so under the stated rules it counts as genuine evidence and does not make the argument circular. The exact-AdS warm-up of Section 6 reproduces the independent Karch-Randall discrete tower [56], further showing that the machinery is not fine-tuned to force the advertised spectra. The skeptical concern about possible singularities of the scalar master variable at A-bounces, where A'(y)=0 makes z=Phi'_0/A' diverge and the coefficient D=9m^2+12kappa-kappa z^2 in (4.28)-(4.30) may vanish, is a technical correctness/stability gap in the justification of 'always discrete', not a circularity: even if valid, it would undermine the proof rather than show the result was imposed by construction. Score 1 reflects only the pervasive but non-circular self-citation of the background framework.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central spectral claims rest on standard holographic duality, the assumed background asymptotics imported from prior work, and standard spectral theory. No entities are invented and no quantities are fitted to reproduce the claimed spectra.

free parameters (2)
  • Polynomial potential parameters (ℓ_L, ℓ_R, Δ_L, Δ_R) = ℓ_L=1, ℓ_R=0.94, Δ_L=1.6, Δ_R=1.1
    Hand-chosen for the illustrative numerical model of Sections 7-8; the universal spectral claims do not depend on these values.
  • Background solution integration constants (for example φ_-, C)
    These select a particular RG-flow solution from the family; they are boundary conditions, not fitted to any target spectrum.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Einstein-dilaton action (2.1) is the correct holographic dual of the strongly coupled large-N QFT on the curved slice.
    Standard AdS/CFT assumption, invoked in Section 1 and used throughout.
  • domain assumption For κ > 0 all acceptable backgrounds have one UV boundary and a regular IR endpoint with a(y) ~ e^{y/α}; for κ < 0 all acceptable backgrounds have two UV boundaries with a(y) ~ 1/y at each end.
    This classification is cited from Refs. [22,28,30] and underpins the universal spectral statements in Section 5; it is not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption The scalar field potential admits the near-boundary expansion (2.14) with 0 < Δ_- ≤ 2, and the UV expansions (2.24)-(2.25) apply.
    Used to derive the asymptotic forms of the Schrödinger potentials in Appendix G and Section 5.
  • standard math One-dimensional Schrödinger operators on finite intervals with 1/y^2 singular endpoints (coefficient bounded below by -1/4) have purely discrete spectra; on half-lines with constant asymptotics they have continuous spectra starting at the asymptotic value.
    Implicit in the statements about discreteness and the threshold at 9/(4α^2).
  • standard math The transverse/longitudinal decomposition of metric fluctuations is valid except at the zero-mode eigenvalues, which are treated separately in Appendix D and decouple.
    Needed to derive gauge-invariant equations in Section 3; zero modes are handled in Appendix D.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the spectra of holographic QFTs on constant curvature manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W2DY4QVT

@misc{pith2026250523366,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the spectra of holographic QFTs on constant curvature manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W2DY4QVT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23366}
}
abstract

We analyze linear fluctuations of five-dimensional Einstein-Dilaton theories dual to holographic quantum field theories defined on four-dimensional de Sitter and Anti-de Sitter space-times. We identify the physical propagating scalar and tensor degrees of freedom. For these, we write the linearized bulk field equations as eigenvalue equations. In the dual QFT, the eigenstates correspond to towers of spin-0 and spin-2 particles propagating on $(A)dS_4$ associated to gauge-invariant composite states. Using particular care in treating special ``zero-modes,'' we show in general that, for negative curvature, the particle spectra are always discrete, whereas for positive curvature they always have a continuous component starting at $m^2 = (9/4)\alpha^{-2}$, where $\alpha$ is the $(A)dS_4$ radius. We numerically compute the spectra in a concrete model characterized by a polynomial dilaton bulk potential admitting holographic RG-flow solutions with a UV and IR fixed points. In this case, we find no discrete spectrum and no perturbative instabilities.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113–1133, [ArXiv:hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1999

  2. [2]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory , Phys. Lett. B428 (1998) 105–114, [ArXiv:hep-th/9802109]

    arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253-291 (1998), [ArXiv:hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Novel Local CFT and Exact Results on Perturbations of N=4 Super Yang Mills from AdS Dynamics

    L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati and A. Zaffaroni, Novel local CFT and exact results on perturbations of N=4 superYang Mills from AdS dynamics , JHEP 12 (1998) 022, [ArXiv:hep-th/9810126]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Spacetime and the Holographic Renormalization Group

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, Space-time and the holographic renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3605–3608, [ArXiv:hep-th/9903190]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch and N. P. Warner, Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3, 363-417 (1999), [ArXiv:hep-th/9904017]

    arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    de Boer, E

    J. de Boer, E. P. Verlinde and H. L. Verlinde, On the holographic renormalization group, JHEP 08 (2000) 003, [ArXiv:hep-th/9912012]

    arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis, How to go with an RG flow , JHEP 08 (2001) 041, [ArXiv:hep-th/0105276]

    arXiv 2001

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, AdS / CFT correspondence and geometry , IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys. 8 (2005) 73–101, [ArXiv:hep-th/0404176]

    2005 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Ceresole and G

    A. Ceresole and G. Dall’Agata, Flow Equations for Non-BPS Extremal Black Holes, JHEP 03 (2007) 110, [ArXiv:hep-th/0702088]

    2007 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Papadimitriou, Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT , JHEP 05 (2007) 075, [ArXiv:hep-th/0703152]

    I. Papadimitriou, Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT , JHEP 05 (2007) 075, [ArXiv:hep-th/0703152]

    2007 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,

    U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, “Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,” JHEP 0802 (2008) 032; [ArXiv:0707.1324][hep-th]; U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II,” JHEP 0802 (2008) 019; [ArXiv:0707.1349][hep-t...

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Heemskerk and J

    I. Heemskerk and J. Polchinski, Holographic and Wilsonian Renormalization Groups, JHEP 06 (2011) 031, [ArXiv:1010.1264][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Faulkner, H

    T. Faulkner, H. Liu and M. Rangamani, Integrating out geometry: Holographic Wilsonian RG and the membrane paradigm , JHEP 08 (2011) 051, [ArXiv:1010.4036][hep-th]. – 92 –

    2011 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Papadimitriou, Holographic Renormalization of general dilaton-axion gravity , JHEP 08 (2011) 119, [ArXiv:1106.4826][hep-th]

    I. Papadimitriou, Holographic Renormalization of general dilaton-axion gravity , JHEP 08 (2011) 119, [ArXiv:1106.4826][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Grozdanov, Wilsonian Renormalisation and the Exact Cut-Off Scale from Holographic Duality, JHEP 06 (2012) 079, [ArXiv:1112.3356][hep-th]

    S. Grozdanov, Wilsonian Renormalisation and the Exact Cut-Off Scale from Holographic Duality, JHEP 06 (2012) 079, [ArXiv:1112.3356][hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kiritsis and V

    E. Kiritsis and V. Niarchos, The holographic quantum effective potential at finite temperature and density, JHEP 08 (2012) 164, [ArXiv:1205.6205][hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bourdier and E

    J. Bourdier and E. Kiritsis, Holographic RG flows and nearly-marginal operators , Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 035011, [ArXiv:1310.0858][hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Kiritsis, W

    E. Kiritsis, W. Li and F. Nitti, Holographic RG flow and the Quantum Effective Action, Fortsch. Phys. 62 (2014) 389–454, [ArXiv:1401.0888][hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Kiritsis, F

    E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. S. Pimenta, Exotic RG Flows from Holography , Fortsch. Phys. 65 (2017) 1600120, [ArXiv:1611.05493][hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    R. C. Myers and A. Sinha, Seeing a c-theorem with holography , Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 046006, [ArXiv:1006.1263][hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and quantum phase transitions,

    J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, “Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and quantum phase transitions,” JHEP 05 (2018), 034; [ArXiv:1711.08462][hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and the F -theorem,

    J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, “Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and the F -theorem,” JHEP 02 (2019), 055, [ArXiv:1810.12318] [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Holographic QFTs on S2timesS2, spontaneous symmetry breaking and Efimov saddle points,

    E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and E. Pr´ eau, “Holographic QFTs on S2timesS2, spontaneous symmetry breaking and Efimov saddle points,” JHEP 08 (2020), 138, [ArXiv:2005.09054] [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Holographic RG flows on Squashed S 3,

    E. Kiritsis and C. Litos, “Holographic RG flows on Squashed S 3,” JHEP 12 (2022), 161; [ArXiv:2209.14342] [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Holographic QFTs on AdSd, wormholes and holographic interfaces,

    A. Ghodsi, J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and V. Nourry, “Holographic QFTs on AdSd, wormholes and holographic interfaces,” JHEP 01 (2023), 121 [ArXiv:2209.12094] [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Holographic CFTs on AdSd × Sn and conformal defects,

    A. Ghodsi, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “Holographic CFTs on AdSd × Sn and conformal defects,” JHEP 10 (2023), 188, [ArXiv:2309.04880] [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    On holographic confining QFTs on AdS,

    A. Ghodsi, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “On holographic confining QFTs on AdS,” JHEP 04, 154 (2025) [ArXiv:2409.02879] [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Flavored ABJM theory on the sphere and holographic F-functions,

    N. Jokela, J. Kastikainen, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “Flavored ABJM theory on the sphere and holographic F-functions,” JHEP 03 (2022), 091 [ArXiv:2112.08715][hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Holographic confining theories on space-times with constant positive curvature,

    J. Kastikainen, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “Holographic confining theories on space-times with constant positive curvature,” [ArXiv:2502.04036][hep-th]. – 93 –

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Improved Holographic QCD on a Curved Background: an Application of Dynamical System Theory in Holography,

    E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and J. L. Raymond “Improved Holographic QCD on a Curved Background: an Application of Dynamical System Theory in Holography,” [ArXiv:2505.10703][hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Marolf, M

    D. Marolf, M. Rangamani and M. Van Raamsdonk, Holographic models of de Sitter QFTs, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 105015, [ArXiv:1007.3996][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Acceleration-Induced Deconfinement Transitions in de Sitter Spacetime,

    J. Blackman, M. B. McDermott and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Acceleration-Induced Deconfinement Transitions in de Sitter Spacetime,” JHEP 08 (2011), 064 [ArXiv:1105.0440][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Glueball mass spectrum from supergravity,

    C. Csaki, H. Ooguri, Y. Oz and J. Terning, “Glueball mass spectrum from supergravity,” JHEP 01 (1999), 017; [ArXiv:hep-th/9806021]

    1999 arXiv

  27. [35]

    On massless 4D gravitons from asymptotically AdS(5) space-times,

    E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “On massless 4D gravitons from asymptotically AdS(5) space-times,” Nucl. Phys. B 772 (2007), 67-102; [ArXiv:hep-th/0611344]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, “Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,” Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994), 6357-6368, [ArXiv:astro-ph/9407016]

    1994 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Stochastic quantum gravitational inflation,

    N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, “Stochastic quantum gravitational inflation,” Nucl. Phys. B 724 (2005), 295-328 [ArXiv:gr-qc/0505115]

    2005 arXiv

  30. [38]

    λϕ4 in dS,

    V. Gorbenko and L. Senatore, “λϕ4 in dS,” [ArXiv:1911.00022] [hep-th]

    1911 arXiv

  31. [39]

    De Sitter at all loops: the story of the Schwinger model,

    D. Anninos, T. Anous and A. Rios Fukelman, “De Sitter at all loops: the story of the Schwinger model,” JHEP 08 (2024), 155, [ArXiv:2403.16166] [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    A Dilatonic deformation of AdS(5) and its field theory dual,

    D. Bak, M. Gutperle and S. Hirano, “A Dilatonic deformation of AdS(5) and its field theory dual,” JHEP 05 (2003), 072; [ArXiv:hep-th/0304129]

    2003 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Dual of the Janus solution: An interface conformal field theory,

    A. B. Clark, D. Z. Freedman, A. Karch and M. Schnabl, “Dual of the Janus solution: An interface conformal field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005), 066003; [ArXiv:hep-th/0407073]

    2005 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Ten-dimensional supersymmetric Janus solutions,

    E. D’Hoker, J. Estes and M. Gutperle, “Ten-dimensional supersymmetric Janus solutions,” Nucl. Phys. B 757 (2006), 79-116; [ArXiv:0603012/hep-th]

    2006

  35. [43]

    Janus Configurations, Chern-Simons Couplings, And The theta-Angle in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, “Janus Configurations, Chern-Simons Couplings, And The theta-Angle in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,” JHEP 06 (2010), 097; [ArXiv:0804.2907 ][hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  36. [44]

    S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, “S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 (2009) no.3, 721-896; [ArXiv:0807.3720 ][hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Exact half-BPS Type IIB interface solutions. I. Local solution and supersymmetric Janus,

    E. D’Hoker, J. Estes and M. Gutperle, “Exact half-BPS Type IIB interface solutions. I. Local solution and supersymmetric Janus,” JHEP 06 (2007), 021; [ArXiv:0705.0022] [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Holography, Entanglement Entropy, and Conformal – 94 – Field Theories with Boundaries or Defects,

    K. Jensen and A. O’Bannon, “Holography, Entanglement Entropy, and Conformal – 94 – Field Theories with Boundaries or Defects,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) no.10, 106006; [ArXiv:1309.4523][hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Janus and J-fold Solutions from Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds,

    N. Bobev, F. F. Gautason, K. Pilch, M. Suh and J. Van Muiden, “Janus and J-fold Solutions from Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.8, 081901 [ArXiv:1907.11132][hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Holographic interfaces in N = 4 SYM: Janus and J-folds,

    N. Bobev, F. F. Gautason, K. Pilch, M. Suh and J. van Muiden, “Holographic interfaces in N = 4 SYM: Janus and J-folds,” JHEP 05 (2020), 134 [ArXiv:2003.09154][hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Spatially modulated and supersymmetric mass deformations of N = 4 SYM,

    I. Arav, K. C. M. Cheung, J. P. Gauntlett, M. M. Roberts and C. Rosen, “Spatially modulated and supersymmetric mass deformations of N = 4 SYM,” JHEP 11 (2020), 156; [ArXiv:2007.15095] [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A new family of AdS4 S-folds in type IIB string theory,

    I. Arav, K. C. M. Cheung, J. P. Gauntlett, M. M. Roberts and C. Rosen, “A new family of AdS4 S-folds in type IIB string theory,” JHEP 05 (2021), 222; [ArXiv:2101.07264] [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    J. M. Maldacena and L. Maoz, Wormholes in AdS , JHEP 02 (2004) 053, [ArXiv:hep-th/0401024]

    2004 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Cosmological Perturbation Theory,

    H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, “Cosmological Perturbation Theory,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 78 (1984), 1-166

    1984

  45. [53]

    Gauge theory meets cosmology,

    M. Bianchi, G. Dibitetto and J. F. Morales, “Gauge theory meets cosmology,” JCAP 12 (2024), 040 [ArXiv:2408.03243][hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Revisiting Coleman-de Luccia transitions in the AdS regime using holography,

    J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, “Revisiting Coleman-de Luccia transitions in the AdS regime using holography,” JHEP 09 (2021), 065; [ArXiv:2102.11881] [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,

    A. Higuchi, “Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,” Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987), 397-436

    1987

  48. [56]

    Locally localized gravity,

    A. Karch and L. Randall, “Locally localized gravity,” JHEP 05 (2001), 008; [ArXiv:hep-th/0011156]

    2001 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Quantum (in)stability of maximally symmetric space-times,

    J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and V. Nourry, “Quantum (in)stability of maximally symmetric space-times,” JHEP 11, 098 (2023); [ArXiv:2303.11091][gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Lichnerowicz, Propagateurs et commutateurs en relativite generale, Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques, Publications Mathematiques, 10 (1961)

    A. Lichnerowicz, Propagateurs et commutateurs en relativite generale, Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques, Publications Mathematiques, 10 (1961)

    1961

  51. [59]

    Conformal field theory correlators from classical field theory on anti-de Sitter space. 2. Vector and spinor fields,

    W. Mueck and K. S. Viswanathan, “Conformal field theory correlators from classical field theory on anti-de Sitter space. 2. Vector and spinor fields,” Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998), 106006; [ArXiv:hep-th/9805145]

    1998 arXiv

  52. [60]

    A note on the representations of SO(1 , d+ 1),

    Z. Sun, “A note on the representations of SO(1 , d+ 1),” Rev. Math. Phys. 37, no.01, 2430007 (2025) [ArXiv:2111.04591][hep-th]; – 95 –

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.