Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

MIRAGE: Assessing Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Chains of MLLM

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.24238 v2 pith:IMI3GSBI submitted 2025-05-30 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords hallucinationsreasoninghallucinationmllmsmultimodaldatasetmethodmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal hallucination in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) restricts the correctness of MLLMs. However, multimodal hallucinations are multi-sourced and arise from diverse causes. Existing benchmarks fail to adequately distinguish between perception-induced hallucinations and reasoning-induced hallucinations. This failure constitutes a significant issue and hinders the diagnosis of multimodal reasoning failures within MLLMs. To address this, we propose the {\dataset} benchmark, which isolates reasoning hallucinations by constructing questions where input images are correctly perceived by MLLMs yet reasoning errors persist. {\dataset} introduces multi-granular evaluation metrics: accuracy, factuality, and LLMs hallucination score for hallucination quantification. Our analysis reveals that (1) the model scale, data scale, and training stages significantly affect the degree of logical, fabrication, and factual hallucinations; (2) current MLLMs show no effective improvement on spatial hallucinations caused by misinterpreted spatial relationships, indicating their limited visual reasoning capabilities; and (3) question types correlate with distinct hallucination patterns, highlighting targeted challenges and potential mitigation strategies. To address these challenges, we propose {\method}, a method that combines curriculum reinforcement fine-tuning to encourage models to generate logic-consistent reasoning chains by stepwise reducing learning difficulty, and collaborative hint inference to reduce reasoning complexity. {\method} establishes a baseline on {\dataset}, and reduces the logical hallucinations in original base models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Understanding the Role of Hallucination in Reinforcement Post-Training of Multimodal Reasoning Models

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    RL post-training on hallucination-forced multimodal data improves reasoning performance and can outperform standard training.

  2. SoccerRef-Agents: Multi-Agent System for Automated Soccer Refereeing

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SoccerRef-Agents is a multi-agent framework using MLLMs, cross-modal RAG, and a custom knowledge base that outperforms general MLLMs on soccer foul decisions and explanations.

  3. HypEHR: Hyperbolic Modeling of Electronic Health Records for Efficient Question Answering

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    HypEHR is a hyperbolic embedding model for EHR data that uses Lorentzian geometry and hierarchy-aware pretraining to answer clinical questions nearly as well as large language models but with much smaller size.

  4. HypEHR: Hyperbolic Modeling of Electronic Health Records for Efficient Question Answering

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 22M-parameter hyperbolic model answers structured EHR questions with accuracy close to LLM-based systems (EHRXQA 89.5%, MIMIC-Instr 76.0%).

  5. A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A structured literature survey concluding that reasoning capabilities do not automatically make LLMs more trustworthy and can introduce new vulnerabilities in safety, robustness, and privacy.

Pith tools