Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 76 references

From Pixels to Camera: Scaling Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors for Imaging at the Quantum-Limit

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that readout engineering, not detection physics, is the bottleneck between today's kilopixel SNSPD arrays and megapixel single-photon cameras.

desk verdict A solid, well-organized perspective on scaling SNSPD arrays; nothing experimentally new, but a fair and useful roadmap that deserves review as a review. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24725 v1 pith:SAASN7NO submitted 2025-05-30 quant-ph cond-mat.supr-conphysics.app-phphysics.optics

Jun Gao , Jin Chang , Bruno Lopez Rodriguez , Iman Esmaeil Zadeh , Val Zwiller , Ali W. Elshaari This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.supr-conphysics.app-phphysics.optics
keywords superconductingnanowiresingle-photondetectorsSNSPDarraysimagingmultiplexedreadoutcryogenicelectronicsquantum-limitedphotoncountingcamerastime-tagging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This perspective article aims to establish that superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) are crossing a threshold: from single-pixel sensors to large-format, time-tagging single-photon cameras. The authors' central bet is that the remaining obstacle is not detection physics but readout and cryogenic wiring, and that multiplexing schemes, cryo-compatible electronics, and computational reconstruction can remove it. If they are right, the same platform that already gives picosecond timing and near-unit efficiency in one pixel can be spread across kilopixel, then megapixel, arrays. That would put quantum-limited imaging within reach of quantum communication, deep-tissue biomedicine, astronomy, remote sensing, and dark-matter searches, because all of these are photon-starved applications that need many simultaneously sensitive pixels.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is multiplexed readout: instead of giving every pixel its own bias and coaxial cable, the pixel's position is encoded into a shared electrical signal and decoded either by coincidence logic, pulse shape, resonator frequency, thermal diffusion, or computational reconstruction. The paper emphasizes time-amplitude multiplexing, which uses hotspot quantization inside engineered nanowires so that a photon event arrives with both a location-dependent amplitude and delay, allowing a full 32×32 image to be read through two lines, and the thermally coupled imager, in which events spread through engineered heat diffusion into a readout bus. These schemes carry the argument because they convert the quadratic wiring problem into a linear or constant-wiring problem; the remaining complexity moves into encoding design and digital reconstruction.

What would settle it

Build a 256×256 array using the same two-line time-amplitude multiplexing that worked at 32×32 and measure spatial discrimination accuracy and timing jitter; if accuracy falls well below the demonstrated 97% or jitter grows beyond the tens-of-picoseconds range, the scaling claim collapses. Likewise, monitor thermal load at sub-kelvin temperatures as on-chip digitization is added; if cooling power is exceeded before megapixel counts are reached, the roadmap fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that scalable SNSPD arrays represent a foundational shift in photon detection technology, not an incremental extension of existing detectors. It argues that single-pixel SNSPDs have already reached the performance levels needed for quantum-limited detection; what blocks imaging at the quantum limit is that wiring, amplification, and thermal load grow roughly quadratically with pixel count. The work assembles the evidence that this bottleneck is solvable: row-column and thermally coupled multiplexing cut wires to linear counts, time-amplitude multiplexing encodes position on just two lines (demonstrated at 32×32 with 97% spatial discrimination and 67.3 ps timing), frequency-division multiplexing shares a single transmission line through superconducting resonators, compressive sensing reconstructs events from pseudo-randomly biased channels, and SFQ circuits digitize events inside the cryostat. With a 400,000-pixel thermally coupled camera already reported, the paper concludes that tens to hundreds of thousands of pixels on a monolithic chip is a realistic roadmap target.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that multiplexing and readout schemes proven at a few thousand pixels will continue to work as arrays grow to tens or hundreds of thousands of pixels, without timing jitter, crosstalk, or heat load becoming prohibitive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If scalable arrays reach hundreds of thousands of pixels, quantum key distribution and high-dimensional quantum communication can use multi-pixel detectors instead of single pixels, giving larger effective collection areas for distorted or turbulent beams.
  • Photon-starved biomedical modalities such as fluorescence lifetime imaging, Raman spectroscopy, and deep-tissue near-infrared imaging would gain picosecond timing and single-photon sensitivity across many pixels, improving depth and resolution in living tissue.
  • Quantum imaging techniques that rely on correlated photons, such as ghost imaging and quantum illumination, would have a detector plane capable of recording many spatial modes simultaneously, extending quantum-enhanced sensing toward practical remote sensing and security imaging.
  • Large-format SNSPD cameras would offer LiDAR and space-to-ground optical links a detector with high timing precision and low noise under daylight, enabling higher data rates and longer ranges.
  • Low-noise, large-area arrays, already of interest for dark-matter and high-energy particle searches, would double as imaging detectors, merging particle physics and astronomy applications in one platform.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors leave implicit that the real scalability ceiling may sit in the data-processing chain, not the detector: a megapixel array at gigahertz count rates would produce enormous timestamp throughput, so cryo-compatible or near-detector machine-learning reconstruction could become as important as the array itself.
  • The same multiplexing tradeoff suggests that foundry-compatible materials and photolithographic manufacturing, rather than fundamental performance, will determine who uses SNSPD cameras in practice.
  • Fractal and polarization-insensitive geometries, combined with tunable two-dimensional superconductors, point toward a future detector plane that could be reconfigured per pixel, letting one camera switch between imaging, spectroscopy, and correlation measurements without hardware changes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This perspective article surveys the technological landscape and roadmap for scaling superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) from single-pixel devices to large-format arrays and cameras. It reviews material platforms (a-WSi, MoSi, NbN, NbTiN, and exploratory 2D/high-Tc systems), detector architectures, and multiplexed readout schemes (row-column, SFQ/AQFP digital logic, time-amplitude multiplexing, compressive sensing, thermal coupling, and frequency-division multiplexing), then discusses key challenges such as cryogenic thermal budget, wiring complexity, device uniformity, crosstalk, and signal-processing bottlenecks. The paper closes with a roadmap toward kilopixel-to-megapixel time-tagging cameras and a survey of applications in quantum communication, biomedical imaging, LiDAR, astronomy, and particle physics. The manuscript is explicitly a perspective and roadmap; it presents no new experimental results, derivations, or quantitative predictions.

Significance. The value of this paper lies in its synthetic perspective: it collects and organizes recent demonstrations (e.g., 32x32 time-amplitude multiplexing with 67.3 ps timing, SFQ-encoded readout, and a 400,000-pixel thermally coupled imager) and candidly identifies bottlenecks such as thermal load, crosstalk, and real-time data processing. If the projected scaling is realized, large-format SNSPD cameras would combine picosecond timing, single-photon sensitivity, and broadband spectral response in ways that no current semiconductor imager offers, with plausible impact on QKD, FLIM, deep-tissue imaging, LiDAR, and dark-matter searches. The authors do not overclaim quantitative predictions; the megapixel vision is framed as a goal requiring further work. However, because the paper makes no new technical claims and its central assertions are aspirational, its significance is that of an informed roadmap rather than a technical advance.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains several typographical errors that should be corrected during revision, including "yield sensitiviry" in the Emerging Materials section, "invistigated" in the Innovative Multiplexing Approaches section, "T echnology" in the affiliations, and inconsistent spacing in references such as "Y .et al." and "V .".
  2. [Innovative Multiplexing Approaches] The statement that row-column multiplexing reduces wiring "from a quadratic scale (N2) to a linear scale (2N)" is ambiguous because N is not defined. If N denotes the number of rows or columns rather than the total pixel count, this should be stated explicitly to avoid misleading readers about the scaling in total pixel number.
  3. [Roadmap and Vision, Fig. 2d] The 400,000-pixel thermally-coupled imager (TCI) is cited as evidence of kilopixel-to-megapixel scalability, but TCI readout does not currently provide independent per-pixel picosecond time-tagging. The text should explicitly separate demonstrated array-scale capabilities from the time-tagging performance that remains a goal, so that readers do not conflate the two.
  4. [References] Reference 67 appears incomplete; it is listed as "A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing. Nature 1-3 (2025)" without author names. Please verify and complete the citation.
  5. [Key Challenges] The sentence "Maintaining sub-100-ps timing resolution across hundreds or thousands of pixels necessitates precise control of the connections" is vague; specifying whether this refers to electrical interconnects, optical coupling, or cryogenic wiring would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning identified: the paper is a perspective and roadmap, not a derivation, and its projections are explicitly framed as future goals rather than as consequences derived from fitted or self-referential inputs.

full rationale

The manuscript is a perspective article that surveys SNSPD materials, readout architectures, and applications. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no quantitative predictions that are claimed to be derived from first principles. The central vision, e.g., that SNSPD arrays could scale toward tens or hundreds of thousands of pixels, is explicitly presented as a roadmap: 'the ultimate vision involves fully integrated, monolithic SNSPD imaging chips comprising tens of thousands of pixels.' The paper repeatedly labels these as goals requiring further work, and the Key Challenges section identifies thermal management, readout complexity, uniformity, crosstalk, and signal processing as open bottlenecks. No load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation: the self-citations (refs 3, 4, 11, 12) are prior experimental and review works cited as background, not as substitutes for a derivation in this paper. The extrapolation from demonstrated kilopixel and 400,000-pixel thermally coupled imagers to megapixel cameras is an explicitly acknowledged aspiration, not an unsupported hidden premise. Therefore, no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a perspective article, the paper introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. The only load-bearing assumption is that demonstrated readout architectures will continue to scale, which is an opinion the paper argues for but cannot prove.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Multiplexed readout schemes that work at kilopixel scale will scale to megapixel arrays without fundamental degradation.
    The roadmap projects tens to hundreds of thousands of pixels based on demonstrations such as the 32x32 TAM array and the 400,000-pixel thermally coupled imager, assuming that further scaling proceeds without hitting a fundamental barrier.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Pixels to Camera: Scaling Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors for Imaging at the Quantum-Limit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SAASN7NO

@misc{pith2026250524725,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Pixels to Camera: Scaling Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors for Imaging at the Quantum-Limit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SAASN7NO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24725}
}
read the original abstract

Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) have emerged as essential devices that push the boundaries of photon detection with unprecedented sensitivity, ultrahigh timing precision, and broad spectral response. Recent advancements in materials engineering, superconducting electronics integration, and cryogenic system design are enabling the evolution of SNSPDs from single-pixel detectors toward scalable arrays and large-format single-photon time tagging cameras. This perspective article surveys the rapidly evolving technological landscape underpinning this transition, focusing on innovative superconducting materials, advanced multiplexed read-out schemes, and emerging cryo-compatible electronics. We highlight how these developments are set to profoundly impact diverse applications, including quantum communication networks, deep-tissue biomedical imaging, single-molecule spectroscopy, remote sensing with unprecedented resolution, and the detection of elusive dark matter signals. By critically discussing both current challenges and promising solutions, we aim to articulate a clear, coherent vision for the next generation of SNSPD-based quantum imaging systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24725 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multiplexed Readout Architectures I: Selected strategies demonstrating the evolution of superconducting nanowire single-photon detector (SNSPD) array scalability. (a) Kilopixel SNSPD array utilizing row-column multiplexing with cryogenic readout electronics14. (b) Thermally coupled row-column SNSPD imaging array, leveraging thermal diffusion for spatial encoding and reduced wiring overhead16. (c) Frequency-division … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Multiplexed Readout Architectures II: Advanced strategies for reading out large-scale superconducting nanowire single-photon detector (SNSPD) arrays. (a) Photonic readout of SNSPDs using optical signal encoding to reduce cryogenic complexity and enable scalable high-speed signal extraction62. (b) Integration of a superconducting digital signal processor for scalable readout of SNSPD arrays using single-flux quantum … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Representative applications enabled by scalable SNSPD arrays. (a) Deep-tissue near-infrared two-photon fluorescence imaging of the mouse brain using a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector (SNSPD) array demonstrates superior sensitivity and depth penetration9 . (b) A compact multi-pixel SNSPD system enabling gigabit space-to-ground optical communications, illustrating the potential of SNSPD arrays in high-… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Guo, S. et al. High-timing-precision detection of single x-ray photons by superconducting nanowires. Natl. Sci. Rev. 11, nwad102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Taylor, G. G. et al. Low-noise single-photon counting superconducting nanowire detectors at infrared wavelengths up to 29 µm. Optica 10, 1672–1678 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Esmaeil Zadeh, I. et al. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state-of-the-art, future developments, and applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Chang, J., Gao, J., Esmaeil Zadeh, I., Elshaari, A. W. & Zwiller, V . Nanowire-based integrated photonics for quantum information and quantum sensing. Nanophotonics 12, 339–358 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for quantum information

    You, L. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for quantum information. Nanophotonics 9, 2673–2692 (2020). 10/13

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    & Zwiller, V

    Steinhauer, S., Gyger, S. & Zwiller, V . Progress on large-scale superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors.Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Defienne, H. et al. Advances in quantum imaging. Nat. Photonics 18, 1024–1036 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Hao, H. et al. A compact multi-pixel superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array supporting gigabit space-to- ground communications. Light. Sci. & Appl. 13, 25 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Tamimi, A. et al. Deep mouse brain two-photon near-infrared fluorescence imaging using a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array. ACS photonics 11, 3960–3971 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Non-invasive confocal fluorescence imaging of mice beyond 1700 nm using superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors

    Wang, F.et al. Non-invasive confocal fluorescence imaging of mice beyond 1700 nm using superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. bioRxiv 2021–08 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Chang, J. et al. Detecting telecom single photons with 99.5- 2.07+ 0.5% system detection efficiency and high time resolution. APL Photonics 6 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Chang, J. et al. Efficient mid-infrared single-photon detection using superconducting nbtin nanowires with high time resolution in a gifford-mcmahon cryocooler. Photonics Res. 10, 1063–1070 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    McCaughan, A. N. Readout architectures for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. Supercond. science & technology 31, 10–1088 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Wollman, E. E. et al. Kilopixel array of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Opt. express 27, 35279–35289 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    McCaughan, A. N. et al. The thermally coupled imager: A scalable readout architecture for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 121 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Allmaras, J. P. et al. Demonstration of a thermally coupled row-column snspd imaging array. Nano letters 20, 2163–2168 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Zhang, T. et al. 32× 32 nbn snspd array based on thermally coupled row-column multiplexing architecture. Superconduc- tivity 7, 100056 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    & Terai, H

    Miyajima, S., Yabuno, M., Miki, S. & Terai, H. Single-flux-quantum based event-driven encoder for large-pixel supercon- ducting nanowire single-photon detector array. IEEE Transactions on Appl. Supercond. 29, 1–4 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    & Terai, H

    Miyajima, S., Yabuno, M., Miki, S., Yamashita, T. & Terai, H. High-time-resolved 64-channel single-flux quantum- based address encoder integrated with a multi-pixel superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Opt. express 26, 29045–29054 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    & Terai, H

    Yabuno, M., Miyajima, S., Miki, S. & Terai, H. Scalable implementation of a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array with a superconducting digital signal processor. Opt. express 28, 12047–12057 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Luskin, J. S. et al. Large active-area superconducting microwire detector array with single-photon sensitivity in the near-infrared. Appl. Phys. Lett. 122 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Snspd array with single-channel readout based on compressive sensing

    Guan, Y .et al. Snspd array with single-channel readout based on compressive sensing. ACS Photonics 9, 3102–3109 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Oripov, B. G. et al. A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels. Nature 622, 730–734 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Doerner, S. et al. Frequency-multiplexed bias and readout of a 16-pixel superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Ortlepp, T. et al. Demonstration of digital readout circuit for superconducting nanowire single photon detector. Opt. Express 19, 18593–18601 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    New constraints on dark matter from superconducting nanowires

    Hochberg, Y .et al. New constraints on dark matter from superconducting nanowires. Phys. Rev. D 106, 112005 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Zhang, X. et al. Characteristics of superconducting tungsten silicide w x s i 1- x for single photon detection. Phys. Rev. B 94, 174509 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Single-photon detection in the mid-infrared up to 10µm wavelength using tungsten silicide superconducting nanowire detectors

    Verma, V .et al. Single-photon detection in the mid-infrared up to 10µm wavelength using tungsten silicide superconducting nanowire detectors. APL photonics 6 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Colangelo, M. et al. Large-area superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for operation at wavelengths up to 7.4 µm. Nano Lett. 22, 5667–5673 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Qin, Z. et al. Thermal-property optimization dominated by the stoichiometric ratio in w-si superconducting single-photon detectors. Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 024046 (2024). 11/13

    2024

  23. [31]

    Ma, L. et al. Doping-driven robust superconductivity in tungsten for single-photon detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 126 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Chiles, J. et al. Superconducting microwire detectors based on wsi with single-photon sensitivity in the near-infrared. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Verma, V . B.et al. High-efficiency superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors fabricated from mosi thin-films. Opt. express 23, 33792–33801 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Korzh, B. et al. Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Nat. Photonics 14, 250–255 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Pearlman, A. et al. Gigahertz counting rates of nbn single-photon detectors for quantum communications.IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity 15, 579–582 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    Esmaeil Zadeh, I. et al. Efficient single-photon detection with 7.7 ps time resolution for photon-correlation measurements. Acs Photonics 7, 1780–1787 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Miki, S. et al. Superconducting nbtin nanowire single photon detectors with low kinetic inductance. Appl. physics express 2, 075002 (2009)

    2009

  30. [38]

    & Terai, H

    Miki, S., Yamashita, T., Wang, Z. & Terai, H. A 64-pixel nbtin superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array for spatially resolved photon detection. Opt. express 22, 7811–7820 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    & Esmaeil Zadeh, I

    Chang, J. & Esmaeil Zadeh, I. Superconducting single-photon detectors get hot. nature nanotechnology 18, 322–323 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices

    Cao, Y .et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    & Morpurgo, A

    Costanzo, D., Jo, S., Berger, H. & Morpurgo, A. F. Gate-induced superconductivity in atomically thin mos2 crystals. Nat. nanotechnology 11, 339–344 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Walsh, E. D. et al. Josephson junction infrared single-photon detector. Science 372, 409–412 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Peña, C. et al. High energy particle detection with large area superconducting microwire array. J. Instrumentation 20, P03001 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    V ., Otrooshi, N., Nam, S

    Reddy, D. V ., Otrooshi, N., Nam, S. W., Mirin, R. P. & Verma, V . B. Broadband polarization insensitivity and high detection efficiency in high-fill-factor superconducting microwire single-photon detectors. APL Photonics 7 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Charaev, I. et al. Large-area microwire mosi single-photon detectors at 1550 nm wavelength. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Yang, C. et al. Large-area tan superconducting microwire single photon detectors for x-ray detection. Opt. Express 29, 21400–21408 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Protte, M. et al. Laser-lithographically written micron-wide superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 35, 055005 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Chi, X. et al. Fractal superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with reduced polarization sensitivity. Opt. Lett. 43, 5017–5020 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Hao, Z. et al. High-performance eight-channel system with fractal superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Chip 3, 100087 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Zou, K. et al. Speckle-insensitive fractal superconducting nanowire single-photon detector coupled with multimode optical fiber. Laser & Photonics Rev. 18, 2400342 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Fractal superconducting nanowires detect infrared single photons with 84% system detection efficiency, 1.02 polarization sensitivity, and 20.8 ps timing resolution

    Meng, Y .et al. Fractal superconducting nanowires detect infrared single photons with 84% system detection efficiency, 1.02 polarization sensitivity, and 20.8 ps timing resolution. Acs Photonics 9, 1547–1553 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    & Gérard, J

    Redaelli, L., Zwiller, V ., Monroy, E. & Gérard, J. Design of polarization-insensitive superconducting single photon detectors with high-index dielectrics. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 035005 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    China, F. et al. Highly efficient nbtin nanostrip single-photon detectors using dielectric multilayer cavities for a 2- µm wavelength band. Opt. Express 31, 20471–20479 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Superconducting single-photon spectrometer with 3d-printed photonic-crystal filters

    Xiao, Y .et al. Superconducting single-photon spectrometer with 3d-printed photonic-crystal filters. ACS Photonics 9, 3450–3456 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Münzberg, J. et al. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detector implemented in a 2d photonic crystal cavity. Optica 5, 658–665 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Ultralow-filling-factor superconducting nanowire single-photon detector utilizing a 2d photonic crystal

    Xiao, Y .et al. Ultralow-filling-factor superconducting nanowire single-photon detector utilizing a 2d photonic crystal. Photonics Res. 11, 2128–2135 (2023). 12/13

    2023

  49. [57]

    Ji, W. et al. Recent advances in metasurface design and quantum optics applications with machine learning, physics- informed neural networks, and topology optimization methods. Light. Sci. & Appl. 12, 169 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Kong, L.-D. et al. Readout-efficient superconducting nanowire single-photon imager with orthogonal time–amplitude multiplexing by hotspot quantization. Nat. Photonics 17, 65–72 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Miyajima, S. et al. Single-flux-quantum signal processors monolithically integrated with a superconducting nanostrip single-photon detector array. Appl. Phys. Lett. 122 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Takeuchi, N. et al. Scalable readout interface for superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors using aqfp and rsfq logic families. Opt. express 28, 15824–15834 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Sypkens, S. et al. Frequency-domain multiplexing of snspds with tunable superconducting resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 124 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    de Cea, M. et al. Photonic readout of superconducting nanowire single photon counting detectors. Sci. reports 10, 9470 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Cooper, B. et al. Optimal leveraging of a gifford-mcmahon cryocooler’s regenerative cooling power for snspd applications. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering , vol. 1301, 012151 (IOP Publishing, 2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Zhang, T. et al. Investigation of a 1.6 k space cryocooler for cooling the superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. IEEE Transactions on Appl. Supercond. 31, 1–5 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    Thiele, F. et al. All optical operation of a superconducting photonic interface. Opt. Express 31, 32717–32726 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Zichi, J. et al. Optimizing the stoichiometry of ultrathin nbtin films for high-performance superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Opt. express 27, 26579–26587 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    Nature 1–3 (2025)

    A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing. Nature 1–3 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    Chen, L. et al. Mid-infrared laser-induced fluorescence with nanosecond time resolution using a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector: New technology for molecular science. Accounts chemical research 50, 1400–1409 (2017)

    2017

  61. [69]

    Integration of a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector into a confocal microscope for time-resolved photoluminescence (trpl)-mapping: Sensitivity and time resolution

    Buschmann, V .et al. Integration of a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector into a confocal microscope for time-resolved photoluminescence (trpl)-mapping: Sensitivity and time resolution. Rev. Sci. Instruments 94 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Wang, F. et al. In vivo non-invasive confocal fluorescence imaging beyond 1,700 nm using superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Nat. nanotechnology 17, 653–660 (2022)

    2022

  63. [71]

    Xia, F. et al. Short-wave infrared confocal fluorescence imaging of deep mouse brain with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Acs Photonics 8, 2800–2810 (2021)

    2021

  64. [72]

    Fast time-domain diffuse correlation spectroscopy with superconducting nanowire single-photon detector: system validation and in vivo results

    Parfentyeva, V .et al. Fast time-domain diffuse correlation spectroscopy with superconducting nanowire single-photon detector: system validation and in vivo results. Sci. Reports 13, 11982 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    A., Schuck, C

    Beutel, F., Gehring, H., Wolff, M. A., Schuck, C. & Pernice, W. Detector-integrated on-chip qkd receiver for ghz clock rates. npj Quantum Inf. 7, 40 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Lidar with superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: Recent advances and developments

    Guan, Y .et al. Lidar with superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: Recent advances and developments. Opt. Lasers Eng. 156, 107102 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    Bass, S. D. & Doser, M. Quantum sensing for particle physics. Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 329–339 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    Buckley, S. M. et al. Integrated-photonic characterization of single-photon detectors for use in neuromorphic synapses. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 054008 (2020). 13/13

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.