Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 93 references

PySEQM 2.0: Accelerated Semiempirical Excited State Calculations on Graphical Processing Units

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read PySEQM 2.0 runs CIS and TDHF excited-state calculations for molecules of nearly 1,000 atoms on a single GPU in under a minute.

desk verdict A genuinely useful GPU implementation of semiempirical CIS/TDHF with credible ORCA validation, but the missing Davidson tolerance and overstated speedup language need fixing before I'd trust the headline numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24807 v1 pith:BRLIIAP7 submitted 2025-05-30 physics.chem-ph physics.comp-ph

Vishikh Athavale , Nikita Fedik , William Colglazier , Anders M. N. Niklasson , Maksim Kulichenko , Sergei Tretiak This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords semiempiricalquantumchemistryexcitedstatesCISTDHFGPUaccelerationPyTorchNDDObatchedDavidsoneigensolver
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that semiempirical excited-state calculations—configuration interaction singles (CIS) and time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF)—can be made fast enough on GPUs to handle molecules of nearly one thousand atoms in about 45 seconds. Sitting on top of the PySEQM ground-state code and PyTorch, the implementation builds a batched Davidson iterative eigensolver that never forms the full CIS/RPA matrices. If the reported numbers hold, this turns excited-state electronic structure into a practical tool for nonadiabatic dynamics and ML-driven parameter optimization on large photoactive molecules. The paper also reports agreement with ORCA's semiempirical CIS and RPA excitation energies to about 0.18 meV on 28 benchmark molecules, which supports the correctness of the GPU implementation. The practical stakes are that large-scale excited-state dynamics and photophysics simulations become possible on a single GPU, where they previously required hours or were out of reach.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the batched Davidson eigensolver implemented as 3-D tensor operations on the GPU. Instead of forming the A and B matrices of the CIS/RPA eigenvalue equations (size (N_occ N_vir)^2), it repeatedly computes matrix-vector products of the form (AV)_{ia} = (epsilon_a - epsilon_i) V_{ia} + sum_{mu nu} C_{mu i} \tilde{F}_{mu nu} C_{nu a}, where \tilde{F} is built by contracting NDDO two-electron integrals with a nonsymmetric density matrix. Zero-padded subspace vectors enforce uniform tensor widths so all molecules in a batch multiply in a single fused step; Krylov subspace size is adapted to available GPU memory, with collapse-and-restart when memory is exceeded. This machinery is what converts the formal O($N^{4}$) CIS cost into the observed near-O($N^{3}$) scaling on GPU.

What would settle it

Reproduce the CN-100 calculation (20 CIS states, AM1 Hamiltonian) on the same A100 GPU with the residual tolerance explicitly set, and record total time and excitation energies; if with a stated tolerance (for example, $10^{{-4}}$ a.u.) the runtime exceeds one minute, or the excitation energies deviate by more than about 0.2 meV from ORCA under identical tolerance, then the headline claim would be shown to be tolerance- or hardware-specific rather than intrinsic.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that a PyTorch-based implementation of CIS and TDHF for NDDO semiempirical Hamiltonians makes excited-state calculations scale to nearly 1,000 atoms in under a minute on a single GPU (20 excited states for CN-100 with ~996 atoms in ~45 s, versus ~380 s on CPU and ~78 min in ORCA). The same implementation is verified by reproducing ORCA's semiempirical CIS and RPA excitation energies to mean absolute errors of 0.18 meV and 0.19 meV over 28 Thiel benchmark molecules, and it includes a batched mode that processes ensembles of molecules concurrently. The authors would state the discovery as: GPU-native linear algebra plus NDDO integral sparsity reduces semiempirical excited-state cost to roughly O($N^{3}$) or lower, making thousand-atom excited-state simulations routine enough for ML-enabled nonadiabatic dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The benchmarks assume that all compared runs—PySEQM GPU, PySEQM CPU, and ORCA—use the same Davidson residual convergence tolerance, but the paper never states a numerical tolerance value, so the speedup and meV accuracy numbers are only comparable if the convergence criteria actually match.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics with surface-hopping ensembles becomes feasible for systems of hundreds to about 1,000 atoms at semiempirical cost on a single GPU, since batch mode directly serves trajectory ensembles.
  • Excitation energies and transition properties for carbon nanotubes, dendrimers, and perylene-diimide stacks—materials relevant to light harvesting—can be generated in seconds rather than hours, enabling rapid screening of optoelectronic candidates.
  • Because the implementation is in PyTorch, the gradient chain can connect excited-state energies to SEQM parameter re-optimization and neural-network Hamiltonian corrections, extending machine-learning workflows to excited states.
  • Even CPU-only PySEQM beats a general quantum-chemistry package (45 s versus 78 min for CN-100), suggesting that the algorithmic structure, not just the hardware, carries much of the gain.
  • Memory-triggered Krylov collapses for large molecules point to a concrete next target: low-memory algorithms such as Lanczos or shift-based restarts for large state counts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If one fixed a common residual tolerance and benchmarked on the same GPU, the 45-second figure would be a hardware- and memory-dependent data point; at larger state counts the reported nonmonotonic timings suggest the practical limit is GPU memory as much as arithmetic cost.
  • The 0.18 meV agreement with ORCA validates internal consistency of the two implementations, not ground-truth accuracy of AM1 excitation energies, since both codes use the same semiempirical Hamiltonian and reference.
  • A testable extension: computing excited-state gradients and nonadiabatic couplings in the same batched Davidson framework would let the method drive ab initio surface-hopping trajectories directly, which is the stated next step in the paper.
  • The batch zero-padding trick could transfer to other iterative eigensolvers in quantum chemistry (e.g., TDDFT with Tamm-Dancoff) wherever multiple systems need low-lying states simultaneously.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a GPU-accelerated implementation of CIS and TDHF/RPA excited-state calculations in the PySEQM semiempirical framework, built on PyTorch. The authors describe a batched Davidson algorithm with zero-padded subspaces and a modified Fock-like contraction for non-symmetric density matrices, and they benchmark it on carbon nanotubes, dendrimers, and perylene-diimide stacks. They report mean absolute excitation-energy deviations of 0.18 meV (CIS) and 0.19 meV (RPA) against ORCA on 28 small Thiel molecules, and a headline timing of about 45 s for 20 CIS states of a 996-atom carbon nanotube on a single A100 GPU. They also demonstrate batch-mode speedups for ensembles of geometries and highlight the software's machine-learning interface.

Significance. If correct, the implementation is a useful contribution: it extends an open-source GPU-accelerated semiempirical code to excited states using standard CIS/TDHF equations with no newly fitted parameters, and the ORCA comparison provides strong evidence that the core equations are implemented correctly. The batched Davidson mode is a practical advance for surface-hopping dynamics and ML-driven workflows, and the open-source availability is a clear strength. However, the reproducibility of the central performance and accuracy claims is weakened by missing convergence-tolerance specifications, absent timing statistics, and an inconsistency in the reported speedup.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Step 5] The Davidson residual tolerance is never given; the text only states that molecules are converged when 'the norm of every residual vector is below tolerance.' This value is load-bearing for both the 0.18/0.19 meV agreement with ORCA and the CN-100 timing in Section 4. Please state the exact thresholds used for PySEQM and for ORCA, and report the per-molecule maximum absolute deviation along with the number of states included in the error statistics.
  2. [Section 4, Fig. 4A and 4B] The headline 'about 45 s' for CN-100 is a single timing in a regime where Fig. 4B reports memory-triggered Krylov subspace collapses and nonmonotonic runtimes. No repetitions or variance are reported, and the CPU and GPU runs are not shown to be converged to the same threshold. Please provide repeated timings on the stated hardware, state the GPU memory configuration, and explicitly verify that the restarted runs converge to the same states satisfying the same criterion.
  3. [Section 4, Fig. 4B] The claim that PySEQM robustly handles up to 100 excited states in the memory-restart regime is a performance claim without an accuracy check in that regime. The validation against ORCA is limited to 5 states of small molecules; for CN-60/80/100, Dendrimer-4, and PDI-12 no reference comparison is given. I ask for a convergence check, such as final residual norms and a comparison of 20-state energies obtained with a tighter tolerance, to confirm that restarts do not alter the reported results.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4] The text says 'over an order of magnitude speedup' while the quoted numbers give 380/45 ≈ 8.4× and Fig. 4A says 'more than 8× speed-up'; please make these descriptions consistent.
  2. [Introduction and Section 3.2] There are misspellings of 'Hartree' as 'Hartee' and 'Hatree', and 'neuclobase' appears for 'nucleobase' in Section 4; a proofread of these terms is needed.
  3. [Supporting Information] The 'Supporting Information Available' section contains placeholder text ('This will usually read something like: ...') that should be replaced with an actual description of the supporting information.
  4. [Section 3.3, Steps 2 and 6] The batched Davidson description explains zero-padding of the subspace vectors but does not specify how the orthogonalization in Step 6 is performed for molecules with different subspace sizes; a brief statement of the batched orthogonalization procedure would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: PySEQM's excited-state implementation is validated against the independent ORCA code, and no excitation-energy result is fitted to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are the 0.18 meV (CIS) and 0.19 meV (RPA) mean absolute errors versus ORCA over 28 Thiel benchmark molecules, and the roughly 45 s GPU time for 20 excited states of CN-100. These follow from solving the standard CIS and TDHF/RPA eigenproblems (Eqs. 2-9) using the fixed AM1 Hamiltonian, whose parameters come from prior literature (Ref. 64) and are not fitted in this paper to the benchmark excitation energies. ORCA 5.0.4 is an independent implementation of semiempirical excited-state methods, so agreement with it is an external check rather than a restatement of the input. The self-citations to prior PySEQM ground-state work (Refs. 56, 61, 62) are used to identify the software platform being extended, not as a mathematical premise that forces the excited-state results. The paper does not invoke any uniqueness theorem, nor does it rename a known empirical pattern and present it as a new derivation. One notable benchmarking weakness is that Section 3.3, Step 5, defines convergence only as residual norms being 'below tolerance' without giving the tolerance value; this affects reproducibility of the timings and the ORCA agreement, but it is a reporting/comparability issue, not circularity. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the excited-state energies: the equations are standard, the parameters are external, and the validation is against an independent code.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters of its own: the semiempirical AM1 Hamiltonian is taken from prior work, and the only hand-set value (Gaussian broadening width 0.1 eV) is a visualization choice. The central claims rest on standard CIS and TDHF equations, the NDDO/AM1 model, a batched Davidson solver with zero-padding, and ORCA as an external reference code. The main unstated numerical assumption is the Davidson residual tolerance. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The NDDO approximation with the AM1 Hamiltonian gives sufficiently accurate ground-state molecular orbitals for CIS and TDHF calculations.
    The paper applies AM1 to carbon nanotubes, dendrimers, and PDI stacks; all physical accuracy of the excited states is inherited from these prior fitted parameters.
  • standard math The standard CIS and TDHF linear-response equations (Eqs. 2 through 7) are valid for computing excited states from a closed-shell Hartree-Fock reference.
    These are textbook equations and are not derived in the paper; they are the theoretical foundation for the implementation.
  • standard math The zero-padded batched Davidson algorithm converges to the same physical eigenpairs as the standard Davidson algorithm after the padded eigenstates are discarded.
    Step 3 of Section 3.3 discards eigenstates arising from zero-padding, but no formal error analysis is given for this equivalence.
  • domain assumption ORCA 5.0.4 provides a correct reference implementation of semiempirical CIS and TDHF.
    The 0.18 meV agreement is interpreted as validation of PySEQM; if ORCA's semiempirical excited-state implementation had systematic errors, the agreement would be misleading.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PySEQM 2.0: Accelerated Semiempirical Excited State Calculations on Graphical Processing Units." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BRLIIAP7

@misc{pith2026250524807,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PySEQM 2.0: Accelerated Semiempirical Excited State Calculations on Graphical Processing Units},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BRLIIAP7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24807}
}
read the original abstract

We report the implementation of electronic excited states for semi-empirical quantum chemical methods at the configuration interaction singles (CIS) and time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) level of theory in the PySEQM software. Built on PyTorch, this implementation leverages GPU acceleration to significantly speed up molecular property calculations. Benchmark tests demonstrate that our approach can compute excited states for molecules with nearly a thousand atoms in under a minute. Additionally, the implementation also includes a machine learning interface to enable parameters re-optimization and neural network training for future machine learning applications for excited state dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24807 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An overview of the capabilities of the PySEQM software, highlighting the available [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Flowchart of the batched Davidson algorithm in PySEQM for computing CIS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (A) Structures of CN-40, PDI-3, and Dendrimer-2, which serve as representative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (A)Total computation time for calculating 20 CIS excited states in six carbon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C.; Bartlett, R

    Comeau, D. C.; Bartlett, R. J. The equation-of-motion coupled-cluster method. Applications to open- and closed-shell reference states. Chemical Physics Letters 1993, 207, 414--423

    1993

  2. [2]

    Kozma, B.; Tajti, A.; Demoulin, B.; Izsák, R.; Nooijen, M.; Szalay, P. G. A New Benchmark Set for Excitation Energy of Charge Transfer States : Systematic Investigation of Coupled Cluster Type Methods . 16, 4213--4225

  3. [3]

    Beyond the Random-Phase Approximation: A New Approximation Scheme for the Polarization Propagator

    Schirmer, J. Beyond the Random-Phase Approximation: A New Approximation Scheme for the Polarization Propagator. Physical Review A 1982, 26, 2395--2416

    1982

  4. [4]

    B.; Schirmer, J

    Trofimov, A. B.; Schirmer, J. An Efficient Polarization Propagator Approach to Valence Electron Excitation Spectra. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 1995, 28, 2299

    1995

  5. [5]

    The Algebraic Diagrammatic Construction Scheme for the Polarization Propagator for the Calculation of Excited States

    Dreuw, A.; Wormit, M. The Algebraic Diagrammatic Construction Scheme for the Polarization Propagator for the Calculation of Excited States. WIREs Computational Molecular Science 2015, 5, 82--95

    2015

  6. [6]

    O.; Taylor, P

    Roos, B. O.; Taylor, P. R.; Sigbahn, P. E. M. A Complete Active Space SCF Method ( CASSCF ) Using a Density Matrix Formulated Super- CI Approach. Chemical Physics 1980, 48, 157--173

    1980

  7. [7]

    A.; Roos, B

    Andersson, Kerstin .; Malmqvist, P. A.; Roos, B. O.; Sadlej, A. J.; Wolinski, Krzysztof . Second-Order Perturbation Theory with a CASSCF Reference Function. The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1990, 94, 5483--5488

    1990

  8. [8]

    Andersson, K.; Malmqvist, P.- .; Roos, B. O. Second-order Perturbation Theory with a Complete Active Space Self-consistent Field Reference Function. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1992, 96, 1218--1226

    1992

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    Runge, E.; Gross, E. K. U. Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984, 52, 997--1000

    1984

  2. [10]

    On the density matrix based approach to time-dependent density functional response theory

    Furche, F. On the density matrix based approach to time-dependent density functional response theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2001, 114, 5982--5992

    2001

  3. [11]

    Casida, M. E. Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods; pp 155--192

  4. [12]

    Shao, Y.; Mei, Y.; Sundholm, D.; Kaila, V. R. I. Benchmarking the Performance of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Methods on Biochromophores. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2020, 16, 587--600

    2020

  5. [13]

    A.; Adamo, C

    Jacquemin, D.; Wathelet, V.; Perpète, E. A.; Adamo, C. Extensive TD-DFT Benchmark: Singlet-Excited States of Organic Molecules. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2009, 5, 2420--2435

    2009

  6. [14]

    Isegawa, M.; Peverati, R.; Truhlar, D. G. Performance of recent and high-performance approximate density functionals for time-dependent density functional theory calculations of valence and Rydberg electronic transition energies. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2012, 137, 244104

    2012

  7. [15]

    Assessing Excited State Methods by Adiabatic Excitation Energies

    Send, R.; K \"u hn, M.; Furche, F. Assessing Excited State Methods by Adiabatic Excitation Energies. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2011, 7, 2376--2386

    2011

  8. [16]

    A.; Head-Gordon, M

    Mardirossian, N.; Parkhill, J. A.; Head-Gordon, M. Benchmark results for empirical post-GGA functionals: Difficult exchange problems and independent tests. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 19325--19337

    2011

  9. [17]

    S.; Zahariev, F.; Gordon, M

    Leang, S. S.; Zahariev, F.; Gordon, M. S. Benchmarking the performance of time-dependent density functional methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2012, 136, 104101

    2012

  10. [18]

    Barca, G. M. J.; Gilbert, A. T. B.; Gill, P. M. W. Simple Models for Difficult Electronic Excitations . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2018, 14, 1501--1509, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2018

  11. [19]

    Highly Accurate Prediction of Core Spectra of Molecules at Density Functional Theory Cost : Attaining Sub -electronvolt Error from a Restricted Open - Shell Kohn – Sham Approach

    Hait, D.; Head-Gordon, M. Highly Accurate Prediction of Core Spectra of Molecules at Density Functional Theory Cost : Attaining Sub -electronvolt Error from a Restricted Open - Shell Kohn – Sham Approach . The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2020, 11, 775--786, Publisher...

    2020

  12. [20]

    Carter-Fenk, K.; Herbert, J. M. State- Targeted Energy Projection : A Simple and Robust Approach to Orbital Relaxation of Non - Aufbau Self - Consistent Field Solutions . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2020, 16, 5067--5082, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2020

  13. [21]

    PCM - ROKS for the Description of Charge - Transfer States in Solution : Singlet – Triplet Gaps with Chemical Accuracy from Open - Shell Kohn – Sham Reaction - Field Calculations

    Kunze, L.; Hansen, A.; Grimme, S.; Mewes, J.-M. PCM - ROKS for the Description of Charge - Transfer States in Solution : Singlet – Triplet Gaps with Chemical Accuracy from Open - Shell Kohn – Sham Reaction - Field Calculations . The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, ...

    2021

  14. [22]

    S.; Kubař, T.; Cui, Q.; Elstner, M

    Christensen, A. S.; Kubař, T.; Cui, Q.; Elstner, M. Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications. Chemical Reviews 2016, 116, 5301--5337

    2016

  15. [23]

    A.; Suhai, S.; Della Sala, F.; Lugli, P.; Elstner, M.; Seifert, G.; Frauenheim, T

    Niehaus, T. A.; Suhai, S.; Della Sala, F.; Lugli, P.; Elstner, M.; Seifert, G.; Frauenheim, T. Tight-binding approach to time-dependent density-functional response theory. Physical Review B 2001, 63, 085108

    2001

  16. [24]

    Domínguez, A.; Aradi, B.; Frauenheim, T.; Lutsker, V.; Niehaus, T. A. Extensions of the Time - Dependent Density Functional Based Tight - Binding Approach . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2013, 9, 4901--4914

    2013

  17. [25]

    Time-dependent density-functional tight-binding method with the third-order expansion of electron density

    Nishimoto, Y. Time-dependent density-functional tight-binding method with the third-order expansion of electron density. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2015, 143, 094108

    2015

  18. [26]

    J.; Elstner, M.; Aradi, B.; Frauenheim, T.; Lutsker, V.; Garcia, A

    Kranz, J. J.; Elstner, M.; Aradi, B.; Frauenheim, T.; Lutsker, V.; Garcia, A. D.; Niehaus, T. A. Time- Dependent Extension of the Long - Range Corrected Density Functional Based Tight - Binding Method . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2017, 13, 1737--1747

    2017

  19. [27]

    Lutsker, V.; Aradi, B.; Niehaus, T. A. Implementation and benchmark of a long-range corrected functional in the density functional based tight-binding method. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2015, 143, 184107

    2015

  20. [28]

    Time- Dependent Long - Range - Corrected Density - Functional Tight - Binding Method Combined with the Polarizable Continuum Model

    Nishimoto, Y. Time- Dependent Long - Range - Corrected Density - Functional Tight - Binding Method Combined with the Polarizable Continuum Model . The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2019, 123, 5649--5659, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2019

  21. [29]

    Performances of Density Functional Tight - Binding Methods for Describing Ground and Excited State Geometries of Organic Molecules

    Fihey, A.; Jacquemin, D. Performances of Density Functional Tight - Binding Methods for Describing Ground and Excited State Geometries of Organic Molecules . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2019, 15, 6267--6276

    2019

  22. [30]

    I.; Sánchez, C

    Bertoni, A. I.; Sánchez, C. G. Data-driven approach for benchmarking DFTB -approximate excited state methods. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2023, 25, 3789--3798

    2023

  23. [31]

    E.; Thiel, W

    Koslowski, A.; Beck, M. E.; Thiel, W. Implementation of a general multireference configuration interaction procedure with analytic gradients in a semiempirical context using the graphical unitary group approach. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2003, 24, 714--726, \_eprint: ...

    2003 doi

  24. [32]

    Beyond the MNDO model: Methodical considerations and numerical results

    Kolb, M.; Thiel, W. Beyond the MNDO model: Methodical considerations and numerical results. Journal of Computational Chemistry 1993, 14, 775--789, \_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jcc.540140704

    1993 doi

  25. [33]

    Orthogonalization corrections for semiempirical methods

    Weber, W.; Thiel, W. Orthogonalization corrections for semiempirical methods. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 2000, 103, 495--506

    2000

  26. [34]

    R.; Thiel, W

    Silva-Junior, M. R.; Thiel, W. Benchmark of Electronically Excited States for Semiempirical Methods : MNDO , AM1 , PM3 , OM1 , OM2 , OM3 , INDO / S , and INDO / S2 . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2010, 6, 1546--1564, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2010

  27. [35]

    O.; Wu, X.; Spörkel, L.; Koslowski, A.; Weber, W.; Steiger, R.; Scholten, M.; Thiel, W

    Dral, P. O.; Wu, X.; Spörkel, L.; Koslowski, A.; Weber, W.; Steiger, R.; Scholten, M.; Thiel, W. Semiempirical Quantum - Chemical Orthogonalization - Corrected Methods : Theory , Implementation , and Parameters . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2016, 12, 1082--1096,...

    2016

  28. [36]

    An efficient implementation of semiempirical quantum-chemical orthogonalization-corrected methods for excited-state dynamics

    Liu, J.; Thiel, W. An efficient implementation of semiempirical quantum-chemical orthogonalization-corrected methods for excited-state dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2018, 148, 154103

    2018

  29. [37]

    P.; González, L

    Zobel, J. P.; González, L. The Quest to Simulate Excited - State Dynamics of Transition Metal Complexes . JACS Au 2021, 1, 1116--1140, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2021

  30. [38]

    Westermayr, J.; Gastegger, M.; Menger, M. F. S. J.; Mai, S.; González, L.; Marquetand, P. Machine learning enables long time scale molecular photodynamics simulations. Chemical Science 2019, 10, 8100--8107, Publisher: The Royal Society of Chemistry

    2019

  31. [39]

    Akimov, A. V. Excited state dynamics in monolayer black phosphorus revisited: Accounting for many-body effects. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 155, 134106

    2021

  32. [40]

    Patel, K.; Bittner, E. R. Mixed Quantum Classical Simulations of Charge - Transfer Dynamics in a Model Light - Harvesting Complex . I . Charge - Transfer Dynamics . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2020, 124, 2149--2157, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2020

  33. [41]

    J.; Akimov, A

    Pal, S.; Trivedi, D. J.; Akimov, A. V.; Aradi, B.; Frauenheim, T.; Prezhdo, O. V. Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics for Thousand Atom Systems : A Tight - Binding Approach toward PYXAID . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2016, 12, 1436--1448, Publisher: American Chemica...

    2016

  34. [42]

    S.; Mart \' nez, T

    Ufimtsev, I. S.; Mart \' nez, T. J. Quantum chemistry on graphical processing units. 1. Strategies for two-electron integral evaluation . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 222--231

    2008

  35. [43]

    C.; Kadau, K.; Swaminarayan, S

    Germann, T. C.; Kadau, K.; Swaminarayan, S. 369 Tflop /s molecular dynamics simulations on the petaflop hybrid supercomputer ` Roadrunner '. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 2009, 21, 2143--2159

    2009

  36. [44]

    S.; Mart \' nez, T

    Ufimtsev, I. S.; Mart \' nez, T. J. Quantum Chemistry on Graphical Processing Units. 2. Direct Self-Consistent-Field Implementation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 1004--1015

    2009

  37. [45]

    S.; Mart \' nez, T

    Ufimtsev, I. S.; Mart \' nez, T. J. Quantum chemistry on graphical processing units. 3. Analytical energy gradients, geometry optimization, and first principles molecular dynamics . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 2619--2628

    2009

  38. [46]

    Density functional theory calculation on many-cores hybrid central processing unit-graphic processing unit architectures

    Genovese, L.; Ospici, M.; Deutsch, T.; M \'e haut, J.-F.; Neelov, A.; Goedecker, S. Density functional theory calculation on many-cores hybrid central processing unit-graphic processing unit architectures. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 034103

    2009

  39. [47]

    E.; Hardy, D

    Stone, J. E.; Hardy, D. J.; Ufimtsev, I. S.; Schulten, K. GPU-accelerated molecular modeling coming of age . J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2010, 29, 116 -- 125

    2010

  40. [48]

    S.; Mart \' nez, T

    Luehr, N.; Ufimtsev, I. S.; Mart \' nez, T. J. Dynamic Precision for Electron Repulsion Integral Evaluation on Graphical Processing Units ( GPU s). J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 949--954

    2011

  41. [49]

    Maia, J. D. C.; Carvalho, G. A. U.; Mangueira, C. P.; Santana, S. R.; Cabral, L. A. F.; Rocha, G. B. GPU Linear Algebra Libraries and GPGPU Programming for Accelerating MOPAC Semiempirical Quantum Chemistry Calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 3131--3144

    2015

  42. [50]

    Accelerating VASP electronic structure calculations using graphic processing units

    Hacene, M.; Anciaux-Sedrakian, A.; Rozanska, X.; Klahr, D.; Guignon, T.; Fleurat-Lessard, P. Accelerating VASP electronic structure calculations using graphic processing units . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 33, 2581--2589

    2012

  43. [51]

    J.; Sanville, E

    Cawkwell, M. J.; Sanville, E. J.; Mniszewski, S. M.; Niklasson, A. M. N. Computing the Density Matrix in Electronic Structure Theory on Graphics Processing Units. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2012, 8, 4094--4101

    2012

  44. [52]

    J.; Mart \' nez, T

    Liu, F.; Luehr, N.; Kulik, H. J.; Mart \' nez, T. J. Quantum chemistry for solvated molecules on graphical processing units using polarizable continuum models. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2012, 8, 3072--3081

    2012

  45. [53]

    P.; Lange, B.; Yu, V

    Huhn, W. P.; Lange, B.; Yu, V. W.; Yoon, M.; Blum, V. GPU acceleration of all-electron electronic structure theory using localized numeric atom-centered basis functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2020, 254, 107314

    2020

  46. [54]

    S.; Windus, T

    Gordon, M. S.; Windus, T. L. Modern Architectures and Their Impact on Electronic Structure Theory. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 9015--9020

    2020

  47. [55]

    S.; Levine, B

    Fales, B. S.; Levine, B. G. Nanoscale Multireference Quantum Chemistry : Full Configuration Interaction on Graphical Processing Units . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2015, 11, 4708--4716, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2015

  48. [56]

    Zhou, G.; Nebgen, B.; Lubbers, N.; Malone, W.; Niklasson, A. M. N.; Tretiak, S. Graphics Processing Unit-Accelerated Semiempirical Born Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics Using PyTorch . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 4951--4962

    2020

  49. [57]

    S.; Mniszewski, S

    Finkelstein, J.; Smith, J. S.; Mniszewski, S. M.; Barros, K.; Negre, C. F. A.; Rubensson, E. H.; Niklasson, A. M. N. Mixed Precision Fermi-Operator Expansion on Tensor Cores from a Machine Learning Perspective. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2021, 17, 2256--2265

    2021

  50. [58]

    S.; Mniszewski, S

    Finkelstein, J.; Smith, J. S.; Mniszewski, S. M.; Barros, K.; Negre, C. F. A.; Rubensson, E. H.; Niklasson, A. M. N. Quantum-Based Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using Tensor Cores. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2021, 17, 6180--6192

    2021

  51. [59]

    M.; Jung, Y.; Choi, H.; Yim, J.; Jang, I.; Kim, D

    Kim, I.; Jeong, D.; Son, W.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Rhee, Y. M.; Jung, Y.; Choi, H.; Yim, J.; Jang, I.; Kim, D. S. Kohn– Sham time-dependent density functional theory with Tamm – Dancoff approximation on massively parallel GPUs . npj Computational Materials 2023, 9, 1--12, Publisher: ...

    2023

  52. [60]

    P.; Alexiu, A.; Van Voorhis, T.; Rhee, Y

    Kim, I.; Jeong, D.; Weisburn, L. P.; Alexiu, A.; Van Voorhis, T.; Rhee, Y. M.; Son, W.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Yim, J.; Kim, S.; Cho, Y.; Jang, I.; Lee, S.; Kim, D. S. Very- Large - Scale GPU - Accelerated Nuclear Gradient of Time - Dependent Density Functional Theory with Tamm – Danc...

    2024

  53. [61]

    Zhou, G.; Nebgen, B.; Lubbers, N.; Malone, W.; Niklasson, A. M. N.; Tretiak, S. Graphics Processing Unit-Accelerated Semiempirical Born Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics Using PyTorch. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2020, 16, 4951--4962

    2020

  54. [62]

    Deep learning of dynamically responsive chemical Hamiltonians with semiempirical quantum mechanics

    Zhou, G.; Lubbers, N.; Barros, K.; Tretiak, S.; Nebgen, B. Deep learning of dynamically responsive chemical Hamiltonians with semiempirical quantum mechanics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2022, 119, e2120333119, Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy...

    2022

  55. [63]

    Dewar, M. J. S.; Thiel, W. Ground states of molecules. 38. The MNDO method. Approximations and parameters. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1977, 99, 4899--4907, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    1977

  56. [64]

    Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1 : a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1985, 107, 3902--3909, Publisher: American...

    1985

  57. [65]

    Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods I . Method . Journal of Computational Chemistry 1989, 10, 209--220, \_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jcc.540100208

    1989 doi

  58. [66]

    Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods V : Modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2007, 13, 1173--1213

    2007

  59. [67]

    Niklasson, A. M. N. Extended Born - Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics . Physical Review Letters 2008, 100, 123004, Publisher: American Physical Society

    2008

  60. [68]

    Niklasson, A. M. N.; Steneteg, P.; Odell, A.; Bock, N.; Challacombe, M.; Tymczak, C. J.; Holmström, E.; Zheng, G.; Weber, V. Extended Lagrangian Born – Oppenheimer molecular dynamics with dissipation. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2009, 130, 214109

    2009

  61. [69]

    Niklasson, A. M. N. Density- Matrix Based Extended Lagrangian Born – Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2020, 16, 3628--3640, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2020

  62. [70]

    Niklasson, A. M. N. Extended Lagrangian Born – Oppenheimer molecular dynamics: from density functional theory to charge relaxation models. The European Physical Journal B 2021, 94, 164

    2021

  63. [71]

    Kulichenko, M.; Barros, K.; Lubbers, N.; Fedik, N.; Zhou, G.; Tretiak, S.; Nebgen, B.; Niklasson, A. M. N. Semi- Empirical Shadow Molecular Dynamics : A PyTorch Implementation . Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2023, 19, 3209--3222, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2023

  64. [72]

    S.; Barros, K

    Lubbers, N.; Smith, J. S.; Barros, K. Hierarchical modeling of molecular energies using a deep neural network. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2018, 148, 241715

    2018

  65. [73]

    Single- Reference ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules

    Dreuw, A.; Head-Gordon, M. Single- Reference ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules . Chemical Reviews 2005, 105, 4009--4037, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2005

  66. [74]

    Davidson, E. R. The iterative calculation of a few of the lowest eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of large real-symmetric matrices. Journal of Computational Physics 1975, 17, 87--94

    1975

  67. [75]

    The simultaneous expansion method for the iterative solution of several of the lowest eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of large real-symmetric matrices

    Liu, B. The simultaneous expansion method for the iterative solution of several of the lowest eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of large real-symmetric matrices. Numerical algorithms in chemistry: algebraic methods 1978, 49--53, Publisher: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory...

    1978

  68. [76]

    Software update: The ORCA program system— Version 5.0

    Neese, F. Software update: The ORCA program system— Version 5.0. WIREs Computational Molecular Science 2022, 12, e1606, \_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1606

    2022 doi

  69. [77]

    S.; Kleiman, V

    Peng, Z.; Melinger, J. S.; Kleiman, V. Light harvesting unsymmetrical conjugated dendrimders as photosynthetic mimics. Photosynthesis Research 2006, 87, 115--131

    2006

  70. [78]

    R.; Swallen, S

    Shortreed, M. R.; Swallen, S. F.; Shi, Z.-Y.; Tan, W.; Xu, Z.; Devadoss, C.; Moore, J. S.; Kopelman, R. Directed Energy Transfer Funnels in Dendrimeric Antenna Supermolecules . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 1997, 101, 6318--6322, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    1997

  71. [79]

    L.; Atas, E.; Hardison, L.; Marder, T

    Palma, J. L.; Atas, E.; Hardison, L.; Marder, T. B.; Collings, J. C.; Beeby, A.; Melinger, J. S.; Krause, J. L.; Kleiman, V. D.; Roitberg, A. E. Electronic Spectra of the Nanostar Dendrimer : Theory and Experiment . The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2010, 114, 20702--20712, ...

    2010

  72. [80]

    T.; Herbertz, S.; Kruss, S

    Ackermann, J.; Metternich, J. T.; Herbertz, S.; Kruss, S. Biosensing with Fluorescent Carbon Nanotubes . Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2022, 61, e202112372, \_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/anie.202112372

    2022 doi

  73. [81]

    Wieland, L.; Li, H.; Rust, C.; Chen, J.; Flavel, B. S. Carbon Nanotubes for Photovoltaics : From Lab to Industry . Advanced Energy Materials 2021, 11, 2002880, \_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aenm.202002880

    2021 doi

  74. [82]

    Efficient Emission of Highly Polarized Thermal Radiation from a Suspended Aligned Carbon Nanotube Film

    Zacheo, A.; Matano, S.; Shimura, Y.; Yu, S.; Doumani, J.; Komatsu, N.; Kono, J.; Maki, H. Efficient Emission of Highly Polarized Thermal Radiation from a Suspended Aligned Carbon Nanotube Film . ACS Nano 2024, 18, 15769--15778, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2024

  75. [83]

    K.; Kinkhabwala, A.; Pop, E.; Cao, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Guo, J.; Dai, H

    Mann, D.; Kato, Y. K.; Kinkhabwala, A.; Pop, E.; Cao, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Guo, J.; Dai, H. Electrically driven thermal light emission from individual single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature Nanotechnology 2007, 2, 33--38, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2007

  76. [84]

    Astruc, D.; Boisselier, E.; Ornelas, C. Dendrimers Designed for Functions : From Physical , Photophysical , and Supramolecular Properties to Applications in Sensing , Catalysis , Molecular Electronics , Photonics , and Nanomedicine . Chemical Reviews 2010, 110, 1857--1959, Pub...

    2010

  77. [85]

    Kim, Y.; Zimmerman, S. C. Applications of dendrimers in bio-organic chemistry. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 1998, 2, 733--742

    1998

  78. [86]

    M.; Zang, L.; Lupton, J

    Chaudhuri, D.; Li, D.; Che, Y.; Shafran, E.; Gerton, J. M.; Zang, L.; Lupton, J. M. Enhancing Long - Range Exciton Guiding in Molecular Nanowires by H - Aggregation Lifetime Engineering . Nano Letters 2011, 11, 488--492, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2011

  79. [87]

    Magic- Angle Stacking and Strong Intermolecular - Interaction in a Perylene Bisimide Crystal : An Approach for Efficient Near - Infrared ( NIR ) Emission and High Electron Mobility

    Zhou, J.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, X.-F.; Wang, C.; Zhou, X.; Xu, B.; Liu, L.; Xie, Z.; Ma, Y. Magic- Angle Stacking and Strong Intermolecular - Interaction in a Perylene Bisimide Crystal : An Approach for Efficient Near - Infrared ( NIR ) Emission and High Electron Mobility . The Jo...

    2018

  80. [88]

    Huang, C.; Barlow, S.; Marder, S. R. Perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic Acid Diimides : Synthesis , Physical Properties , and Use in Organic Electronics . The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2011, 76, 2386--2407, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2011

  81. [89]

    R.; Grozema, F.; Andrienko, D

    May, F.; Marcon, V.; Hansen, M. R.; Grozema, F.; Andrienko, D. Relationship between supramolecular assembly and charge-carrier mobility in perylenediimide derivatives: The impact of side chains. Journal of Materials Chemistry 2011, 21, 9538--9545, Publisher: The Royal Society ...

    2011

  82. [90]

    M.; Tretiak, S.; Fernandez-Alberti, S.; Sharifzadeh, S

    Mukazhanova, A.; Negrin-Yuvero, H.; Freixas, V. M.; Tretiak, S.; Fernandez-Alberti, S.; Sharifzadeh, S. The impact of stacking and phonon environment on energy transfer in organic chromophores: computational insights. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2023, 11, 5297--5306, Publ...

    2023

  83. [91]

    Cullum, J.; Willoughby, R. A. Computing eigenvalues of very large symmetric matrices— An implementation of a Lanczos algorithm with no reorthogonalization. Journal of Computational Physics 1981, 44, 329--358

    1981

  84. [92]

    Wilkinson, J. H. The algebraic eigenvalue problem; Oxford University Press, Inc.: USA, 1988

    1988

  85. [93]

    Mardirossian, Narbe and Parkhill, John A. and Head-Gordon, Martin

    lanl/ PYSEQM : an interface to semi-empirical quantum chemistry methods implemented with pytorch. https://github.com/lanl/PYSEQM/ mcitethebibliography main.tex0000664000000000000000000014644715016362107011245 0ustar rootroot [journal=jctcce,manuscript=article] achemso [version...

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.