Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 75 references

Bound on Lyapunov exponent for a charged particle in Kerr-Sen-AdS Black Hole

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the bound on chaos can be violated by charged test particles in GMGHS-AdS and Kerr-Sen-AdS black holes, with violation appearing analytically near the horizon and growing with charge, spin, and negative cosmological…

desk verdict A competent but incremental extension of the known Kerr-Newman chaos-bound analysis to GMGHS/Kerr-Sen-AdS; the clean analytic violation is real within the model, but it sits in a probe limit where the particle charge diverges, so the physical claim is conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00833 v1 pith:5FMFPWCF submitted 2025-06-01 gr-qc hep-th

Hocheol Lee , Bogeun Gwak This is my paper
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C5783C1083E30
keywords LyapunovexponentchaosboundKerr-Sen-AdSblackholeGMGHS-Adchargedparticlesurfacegravitynear-extremalholesrotation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the bound on chaos for particle orbits, $\lambda \leq \kappa$ where $\lambda$ is the Lyapunov exponent and $\kappa$ the surface gravity, can be violated by charged test particles around GMGHS-AdS and Kerr-Sen-AdS black holes. The violation is established analytically in the static near-horizon limit, where $\kappa^2 - \lambda^2$ is negative at linear order in the distance $\epsilon$ of the orbit from the horizon for any nonzero particle angular momentum, and it is confirmed by numerical scans over particle charge and angular momentum. The authors show the violation becomes more pronounced when the particle and black hole carry same-sign charges, when the particle's angular momentum is anti-aligned with the black-hole spin, and when a negative cosmological constant is present. The point of the analysis is that string-theory-inspired black holes can evade a bound that was proposed as universal, so the result matters for holography and for the correspondence between classical and quantum chaos.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the one-dimensional effective potential $V_{\rm eff}(r)$ for equatorial charged-particle motion, derived from the Polyakov-type action by fixing the static gauge, eliminating the auxiliary worldline field, and using the conserved angular momentum $L$. Near an unstable circular orbit $r_0$ the squared Lyapunov exponent is $\lambda^2 = -V''(r_0)/K(r_0)$, where $K(r)$ is the radial kinetic coefficient; the paper uses the Jacobian-matrix formulation to justify this formula. The analytic violation comes from expanding $V_{\rm eff}$ around $r_0 = r_h + \epsilon$: the linear-order term in $\epsilon$ flips the sign of $\kappa^2 - \lambda^2$ for $L \neq 0$, giving a direct violation without numerical fitting.

What would settle it

Take a GMGHS-AdS black hole with $M=1$, $Q=0.5$, $\Lambda=0$ and a charged probe with moderate fixed values (for example $q=10$, $L=10$); solve $V'(r_0)=0$ numerically and compute $\lambda^2$ from the exact formula, not the $\epsilon$ expansion. If $\kappa^2 - \lambda^2$ is positive at that orbit, the near-horizon violation does not persist at finite charge and is an artifact of the $q \propto 1/\sqrt{\epsilon}$ limit. The same check with backreaction included would be definitive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Lyapunov exponent $\lambda$ computed from the effective potential for a charged particle in an unstable equatorial orbit can exceed the surface gravity $\kappa$ in GMGHS-AdS and Kerr-Sen-AdS spacetimes. In the static limit the cleanest analytic statement is Eq. (50): writing the orbit as $r_0 = r_h + \epsilon$, the difference $\kappa^2 - \lambda^2$ is negative at order $\epsilon$ for nonzero particle angular momentum $L$, so the bound fails arbitrarily close to the horizon. For the rotating case the numerical evidence shows the violation is generic in the near-extremal regime, with the violation region growing as the black hole charge and spin increase and as the cosmological constant becomes more negative; at extremality the surface gravity vanishes and the violation is systematic. The paper also identifies parameter choices that suppress or restore the bound: $L=0$ and the $\Lambda \to -\infty$ limit of the static case keep $\kappa^2 - \lambda^2$ positive, and narrow windows of bound satisfaction survive at moderate rotation before disappearing at high spin.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the charged particle is a test probe whose charge and angular momentum do not deform the black hole, even though the near-horizon orbits require charges as large as $|q| \approx 150$ and $q \propto 1/\sqrt{\epsilon}$; if backreaction or string corrections change the effective potential, the computed Lyapunov exponents no longer describe the physical system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Near-extremal GMGHS-AdS and Kerr-Sen-AdS black holes with a charged probe violate the chaos bound $\lambda \leq \kappa$ for generic nonzero particle angular momentum.
  • In the static GMGHS-AdS case the bound survives when $L=0$ and in the large-$|\Lambda|$ limit, so violations require both orbital angular momentum and proximity to the horizon.
  • In the rotating Kerr-Sen-AdS case, same-sign charges ($qQ>0$) and anti-aligned angular momentum ($aL<0$) are the most efficient channels for violation, while aligned configurations can retain narrow windows where the bound holds.
  • Increasing black-hole spin enlarges the violation region until, at high spin, no bound-satisfying window remains; exactly extremal black holes violate the bound everywhere in the scanned parameter space because $\kappa=0$.
  • In the rotating case the limit $\Lambda \to -\infty$ removes the unstable circular orbit altogether, so very strong negative cosmological constant suppresses chaos in Kerr-Sen-AdS.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The near-horizon expansion hides a steep price: Eq. (41) requires the probe charge to scale as $q \propto 1/\sqrt{\epsilon}$ as the orbit approaches the horizon, so the analytic violation lives in a regime of very large test charge; checking whether the same sign survives at finite fixed $q$ is a natural stress test.
  • If backreaction or higher-order string corrections alter the effective potential at those large charges, the bound might be restored; a self-consistent calculation including the particle's stress-energy would settle it.
  • The same machinery could be applied to dyonic or ultraspinning generalizations of Kerr-Sen-AdS and to higher-dimensional Sen-type solutions to see whether the violation pattern is governed by the same sign conditions $qQ>0$ and $aL<0$.
  • A practical extension would be to map the boundary of the violation region in the $(q,L)$ plane and test whether it follows a simple sign-based rule, which would turn the numerical scans into a predictive classification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper studies the classical Lyapunov exponent λ of a charged test particle on unstable equatorial orbits in the GMGHS–AdS and Kerr–Sen–AdS black hole backgrounds. It derives an effective radial potential, computes λ² = −V''(r0)/K(r0) at the unstable orbit, and compares λ² with the squared surface gravity κ² of the black hole. The authors present an analytic near-horizon expansion, Eq. (50), showing κ²−λ² < 0 for L≠0, and numerical scans over q, L, Λ, Q, and a displaying broad violation regions. They conclude that the MSS-type chaos bound is violated robustly in these string-inspired spacetimes, especially for qQ>0, aL<0, and large negative Λ.

Significance. If correct, the paper would extend the existing catalogue of possible classical violations of the chaos bound to a string-inspired, asymptotically AdS rotating family, and the analytic expressions in the GMGHS limit are useful reference results. The non-rotating algebra is internally consistent: Eq. (41) follows from V'(r0)=0, and Eq. (50) is a genuine near-horizon expansion. However, the physical significance is conditional on the probe approximation and on a meaningful nonzero surface gravity benchmark; both conditions are problematic in substantial parts of the parameter space used to support the central claim. The paper does not provide reproducible code, but the analytic derivations are a strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (41); Eq. (50)] The near-horizon violation is obtained in a limit where the required probe charge diverges. For r0 = rh + ϵ with Δ'_r(rh) ≠ 0, Eq. (41) behaves as q ∼ const/√ϵ, so q → ∞ as ϵ → 0. Thus the analytic violation in Eq. (50) describes a probe whose charge is parametrically large rather than a generic small perturbation. The numerical scans in Figs. 1–6 use |q| and |L| up to 150 with M = 1 and Q ≤ O(1); the dimensionless products qQ/M² and q²/M² are then not small, so the fixed-background effective potential (37) and the λ² derived from it are not self-consistent, as backreaction and self-force effects can be of the same order. Since the closing discussion in §5 explicitly defers backreaction to future work, the claim that the violation is a robust feature of the spacetime is not yet supported.
  2. [§4.2, Figs. 3–6; §5] The extremal columns are not evidence of a genuine bound violation. For an extremal black hole the surface gravity (15) vanishes, so the inequality λ ≤ κ reduces to λ ≤ 0, which no unstable orbit with positive λ can satisfy. The rightmost panels, which are entirely colored, therefore exhibit a trivial incompatibility between κ = 0 and an unstable orbit, not a violation of the MSS-type bound. The same issue affects the statement in §5 that the Lyapunov bound is systematically violated in the extremal limit. The analysis should either exclude extremal configurations from the violation statistics or explicitly discuss the sense in which the bound is meaningful at T = 0.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3, Eq. (29)] As printed, Eq. (29) is dimensionally inconsistent: the term (1 − Λ/3(r²+2br))² appears without the factor a² that is required by the metric (12), so it mixes dimensionless and length² contributions inside the bracket. Please check and correct this factor.
  2. [§2.1, Eq. (16)] The sentence containing Eq. (16) has a duplicated phrase: 'the corresponding bound on the Lyapunov exponent [25] is [25] is'. Please fix the typo.
  3. [§4.1, Eq. (50)] In the line after Eq. (50), the notation '(3r+ + 2b)' is inconsistent with the surrounding text, which uses rh for the horizon radius; it should read '(3rh + 2b)'.
  4. [Figs. 1–7] The figure captions do not define the meaning of the white, gray, and colored regions, nor do they specify the axes beyond the main text; each caption should state that the horizontal axis is q and the vertical axis is L, and should define the coloring scheme in the caption itself.
  5. [§4.2] The text says the plots 'on the extreme left ... denote an extremally charged black hole' while the preceding sentence says the far left is an uncharged black hole; the extremal panels are actually the rightmost ones. Please correct this wording.
  6. [§4.1, Eq. (45) and following] The statement that in the large-|Λ| limit the bound is satisfied only for sufficiently large q is tied to the scaling q ∝ √(−Λ) in Eq. (45); for finite Λ in the numerical scans this asymptotic statement is not directly tested, and the relation should be stated more carefully.
  7. [References] Several references, including Refs. [41], [48], [50], and [52], are arXiv preprints without journal publication data; please update them if published versions are available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Lyapunov exponent is computed from the paper's own effective potential and compared to the external surface-gravity benchmark; self-citations are consistency checks only.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The effective potential (37) is obtained from the Polyakov-type action (27)-(28) for a charged probe in the Kerr-Sen-AdS background, and the Lyapunov exponent is defined independently as the Jacobian eigenvalue (39). The comparison quantity kappa^2 is read off from the black hole metric (15), i.e. from the external MSS/Hashimoto-Tanahashi benchmark, not from the fitted data. The near-horizon violation (50) is an analytic expansion around the unstable orbit r0 = rh + epsilon; the charge q is constrained by the equilibrium condition V'(r0)=0 (Eq. 41), but the displayed leading coefficient of kappa^2 - lambda^2 is independent of q and is not adjusted to produce the negative sign. The numerical scans scan particle charge and angular momentum as input parameters rather than fitting the target exponent. Self-citations [36,49,51] appear only in a consistency statement about reproducing previously known Kerr(-AdS) plots, which is not load-bearing for the central claim. The extremal kappa=0 cases are consequences of choosing the standard benchmark, not circular inputs. The physical concern about large probe charges and backreaction is a validity/correctness issue, not a circularity of the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. All physical inputs (M, Q, a, Λ for the black hole; m, q, L for the particle) are parameters of the existing theory, scanned by hand rather than fitted. The central claim depends essentially on choosing q and L in the large-|q|, L≠0 regime, and on the interpretive assumption that the MSS bound applies to classical test-particle orbits.

free parameters (5)
  • q (probe charge) = scanned from -150 to 150 in numerical figures; set by r0 via Eq. (41) in analytic limits
    The claimed violations appear mainly for |q| large and for qQ>0; the near-horizon analytic violation requires q to diverge as r0 approaches the horizon.
  • L (probe angular momentum) = scanned from -150 to 150
    The near-horizon violation term in Eq. (50) is proportional to -L², so L≠0 is necessary; the aL<0 alignment enhances violation.
  • Λ (cosmological constant) = 0, -0.5, -1 (dimensionless) in the numerics
    More negative Λ enlarges violation regions, a central claimed dependence.
  • Q (black hole charge) = GMGHS: 0, 0.5, 1; Kerr-Sen: 0 to QMax (0.847 to 1.342) across Λ and a
    Violation strengthens with |Q| and requires qQ>0 for the most pronounced effects.
  • a (black hole spin) = 0.1 and 0.5
    Higher spin suppresses the gray (bound-satisfied) regions, enhancing violation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Kerr-Sen-AdS metric (8) and potential (13) solve the effective string action (7) with the dualized axion field.
    Taken from prior literature (Refs. [63,64]); no independent verification in this paper.
  • domain assumption The MSS bound λ ≤ 2πT applies to the classical Lyapunov exponent of a test particle near a black hole.
    This is the paper's interpretive foundation, inherited from Hashimoto-Tanahashi [26]; the paper does not defend the classical-to-quantum extrapolation.
  • standard math The effective Lagrangian can be truncated at O(˙r⁴) when ˙r² ≪ 1 near the unstable orbit.
    Used to obtain Eq. (35) and the harmonic approximation (38); standard local analysis.
  • domain assumption The probe particle does not backreact on the geometry for the scanned parameters.
    All derivations treat the particle as a test charge; violated for extremely large q or near-horizon configurations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bound on Lyapunov exponent for a charged particle in Kerr-Sen-AdS Black Hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5FMFPWCF

@misc{pith2026250600833,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bound on Lyapunov exponent for a charged particle in Kerr-Sen-AdS Black Hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5FMFPWCF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00833}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the upper bound of the Lyapunov exponent for a charged particle in the Gibbons--Maeda--Garfinkle--Horowitz--Strominger (GMGHS)--AdS and Kerr--Sen--AdS black hole backgrounds, which originate from the low-energy effective actions of heterotic string theory and gauged supergravity. We analyze the Lyapunov exponent near the unstable orbit to examine possible violations of the bound. Our results indicate that the bound is sensitive to the signs and magnitudes of the charges, the angular momentum of the particle, the black hole spin, and the negative cosmological constant. The violations are pronounced in the extremal or near-extremal regime. Numerical analysis supports the analytical predictions and highlights the interplay between the string-inspired black hole and the charged particle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00833 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Massless particle (m = 0) in the GMGHS black hole (a = 0) background. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Massive particle (m = 1) in the GMGHS black hole (a = 0) background. The effective Lagrangian (35) is invariant under the reversal of the particle’s angular momentum (L → −L); therefore, we can consider only positive values of L in the GMGHS black hole cases. The top-left plot depicts a pure Schwarzschild black hole, while the top-right plot illustrates a GMGHS black hole with an electric charge Q = 1. The bottom-le… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Massless particle (m = 0) in the Kerr-Sen-AdS black hole (a = 0.1) background. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Massive particle (m = 1) in the Kerr-Sen-AdS black hole (a = 0.1) background. 0 0.9QMax QMax Q 0 −0.5 −1.0 Λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Massless particle (m = 0) in the Kerr-Sen-AdS black hole (a = 0.5) background. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Massive particle (m = 1) in the Kerr-Sen-AdS black hole (a = 0.5) background. Figs. 3, 4, 5, and 6 present the violation of the bound on chaos based on analyses of the behavior of the Lyapunov exponent for particle motion in the Kerr–Sen–AdS black hole spacetime. The p…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Location of the unstable radial equilibrium point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole. Astrophys. J. Lett., 875:L1, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(6):061102, 2016

    2016

  3. [3]

    S. W. Hawking. Particle Creation by Black Holes. Commun. Math. Phys., 43:199–220, 1975. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Bekenstein

    Jacob D. Bekenstein. Black holes and entropy. Phys. Rev. D, 7:2333–2346, 1973

    work page 1973

  5. [5]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity

    Juan Martin Maldacena. The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2:231–252, 1998

    1998

  6. [6]

    The dS / CFT correspondence

    Andrew Strominger. The dS / CFT correspondence. JHEP, 10:034, 2001

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Inflation and the dS / CFT correspondence

    Andrew Strominger. Inflation and the dS / CFT correspondence. JHEP, 11:049, 2001

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    The dS / CFT correspondence and the big smash

    Brett McInnes. The dS / CFT correspondence and the big smash. JHEP, 08:029, 2002. 15

    work page 2002

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence

    Dionysios Anninos, Thomas Hartman, and Andrew Strominger. Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence. Class. Quant. Grav., 34(1):015009, 2017

    2017

  2. [10]

    The Kerr/CFT Corre- spondence

    Monica Guica, Thomas Hartman, Wei Song, and Andrew Strominger. The Kerr/CFT Corre- spondence. Phys. Rev. D, 80:124008, 2009

    2009

  3. [11]

    Another Realization of Kerr/CFT Correspondence

    Yoshinori Matsuo, Takuya Tsukioka, and Chul-Moon Yoo. Another Realization of Kerr/CFT Correspondence. Nucl. Phys. B, 825:231–241, 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    Hidden Conformal Symmetry of the Kerr Black Hole

    Alejandra Castro, Alexander Maloney, and Andrew Strominger. Hidden Conformal Symmetry of the Kerr Black Hole. Phys. Rev. D, 82:024008, 2010

    2010

  5. [13]

    The Kerr/CFT Correspondence and its Extensions.Living Rev

    Geoffrey Comp` ere. The Kerr/CFT Correspondence and its Extensions.Living Rev. Rel., 15(1):11– 81, 2012

    2012

  6. [14]

    Garousi and Ahmad Ghodsi

    Mohammad R. Garousi and Ahmad Ghodsi. The RN/CFT Correspondence. Phys. Lett. B, 687:79–83, 2010

    2010

  7. [15]

    Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD

    Tadakatsu Sakai and Shigeki Sugimoto. Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD. Prog. Theor. Phys., 113:843–882, 2005

    2005

  8. [16]

    Son, and Mikhail A

    Joshua Erlich, Emanuel Katz, Dam T. Son, and Mikhail A. Stephanov. QCD and a holographic model of hadrons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95:261602, 2005

    2005

  9. [17]

    Son, and Mikhail A

    Andreas Karch, Emanuel Katz, Dam T. Son, and Mikhail A. Stephanov. Linear confinement and AdS/QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 74:015005, 2006

    2006

  10. [18]

    Steven S. Gubser. Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon. Phys. Rev. D, 78:065034, 2008

    2008

  11. [19]

    Hartnoll, Christopher P

    Sean A. Hartnoll, Christopher P. Herzog, and Gary T. Horowitz. Building a Holographic Super- conductor. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:031601, 2008

    2008

  12. [20]

    Hartnoll, Christopher P

    Sean A. Hartnoll, Christopher P. Herzog, and Gary T. Horowitz. Holographic Superconductors. JHEP, 12:015, 2008

    2008

  13. [21]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT

    Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi. Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:181602, 2006

    2006

  14. [22]

    Hubeny, Mukund Rangamani, and Tadashi Takayanagi

    Veronika E. Hubeny, Mukund Rangamani, and Tadashi Takayanagi. A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal. JHEP, 07:062, 2007

    2007

  15. [23]

    Fast Scramblers

    Yasuhiro Sekino and Leonard Susskind. Fast Scramblers. JHEP, 10:065, 2008

    2008

  16. [24]

    Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

    Juan Maldacena and Douglas Stanford. Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. D, 94(10):106002, 2016

    2016

  17. [25]

    Shenker, and Douglas Stanford

    Juan Maldacena, Stephen H. Shenker, and Douglas Stanford. A bound on chaos. JHEP, 08:106, 2016

    2016

  18. [26]

    Universality in Chaos of Particle Motion near Black Hole Horizon

    Koji Hashimoto and Norihiro Tanahashi. Universality in Chaos of Particle Motion near Black Hole Horizon. Phys. Rev. D, 95(2):024007, 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    Causality bounds chaos in geodesic motion

    Koji Hashimoto and Kakeru Sugiura. Causality bounds chaos in geodesic motion. Phys. Rev. D, 107(6):066005, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Chaos bound and its violation in charged Kiselev black hole

    Chuanhong Gao, Deyou Chen, Chengye Yu, and Peng Wang. Chaos bound and its violation in charged Kiselev black hole. Phys. Lett. B, 833:137343, 2022. 16

    2022

  21. [29]

    Probing phase structure of black holes with Lyapunov exponents

    Xiaobo Guo, Yuhang Lu, Benrong Mu, and Peng Wang. Probing phase structure of black holes with Lyapunov exponents. JHEP, 08:153, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Homoclinic orbit and the vi- olation of the chaos bound around a black hole with anisotropic matter fields

    Soyeon Jeong, Bum-Hoon Lee, Hocheol Lee, and Wonwoo Lee. Homoclinic orbit and the vi- olation of the chaos bound around a black hole with anisotropic matter fields. Phys. Rev. D, 107(10):104037, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Near-horizon chaos beyond Einstein gravity

    Surajit Das, Surojit Dalui, and Rickmoy Samanta. Near-horizon chaos beyond Einstein gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 110(12):124037, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Bounds for Lyapunov exponent of circular light orbits in black holes

    Emanuel Gallo and Thomas M¨ adler. Bounds for Lyapunov exponent of circular light orbits in black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(3):299, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Lyapunov exponents and phase transition of Hayward AdS black hole

    Naba Jyoti Gogoi, Saumen Acharjee, and Prabwal Phukon. Lyapunov exponents and phase transition of Hayward AdS black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(11):1144, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Thermodynamic stability versus chaos bound viola- tion in D-dimensional RN black holes: Angular momentum effects and phase transitions

    Yu-Qi Lei, Xian-Hui Ge, and Surojit Dalui. Thermodynamic stability versus chaos bound viola- tion in D-dimensional RN black holes: Angular momentum effects and phase transitions. Phys. Lett. B, 856:138929, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Interplay be- tween the Lyapunov exponents and phase transitions of charged AdS black holes

    Bhaskar Shukla, Pranaya Pratik Das, David Dudal, and Subhash Mahapatra. Interplay be- tween the Lyapunov exponents and phase transitions of charged AdS black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 110(2):024068, 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    Bound on the Lyapunov exponent in Kerr-Newman black holes via a charged particle

    Naoto Kan and Bogeun Gwak. Bound on the Lyapunov exponent in Kerr-Newman black holes via a charged particle. Phys. Rev. D, 105(2):026006, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Bound on Lyapunov exponent in Einstein- Maxwell-Dilaton-Axion black holes

    Chengye Yu, Deyou Chen, and Chuanhong Gao. Bound on Lyapunov exponent in Einstein- Maxwell-Dilaton-Axion black holes. Chin. Phys. C, 46(12):125106, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Chaos and fast scrambling delays of a dyonic Kerr-Sen-AdS4 black hole and its ultraspinning version

    Hadyan Luthfan Prihadi, Freddy Permana Zen, Donny Dwiputra, and Seramika Ariwahjoedi. Chaos and fast scrambling delays of a dyonic Kerr-Sen-AdS4 black hole and its ultraspinning version. Phys. Rev. D, 107(12):124053, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Localized chaos due to rotating shock waves in Kerr–AdS black holes and their ultraspinning version

    Hadyan Luthfan Prihadi, Freddy Permana Zen, Donny Dwiputra, and Seramika Ariwahjoedi. Localized chaos due to rotating shock waves in Kerr–AdS black holes and their ultraspinning version. Gen. Rel. Grav., 56(8):90, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Giataganas, A

    D. Giataganas, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto. Quasinormal modes and universality of the Penrose limit of black hole photon rings. JHEP, 09:168, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Chaos bound and its violation in the torus-like black hole

    Rui Yin, Jing Liang, and Benrong Mu. Chaos bound and its violation in the torus-like black hole. 10 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    Angular momentum and chaos bound of charged particles around Einstein–Euler–Heisenberg AdS black holes

    Deyou Chen and Chuanhong Gao. Angular momentum and chaos bound of charged particles around Einstein–Euler–Heisenberg AdS black holes. New J. Phys., 24(12):123014, 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Circular motion and chaos bound of a charged particle near charged 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet-AdS black holes

    Jiayu Xie, Jie Wang, and Bing Tang. Circular motion and chaos bound of a charged particle near charged 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet-AdS black holes. Phys. Dark Univ., 42:101271, 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    Violating the chaos bound in five- dimensional, charged, rotating Einstein-Maxwell-Chern-Simons black holes

    Chengye Yu, Deyou Chen, Benrong Mu, and Yucheng He. Violating the chaos bound in five- dimensional, charged, rotating Einstein-Maxwell-Chern-Simons black holes. Nucl. Phys. B, 987:116093, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    Naveena Kumara, Shreyas Punacha, and Md Sabir Ali

    A. Naveena Kumara, Shreyas Punacha, and Md Sabir Ali. Lyapunov exponents and phase struc- ture of Lifshitz and hyperscaling violating black holes. JCAP, 07:061, 2024. 17

    2024

  38. [46]

    Chaos bound in Kerr-Newman-Taub-NUT black holes via circular motions

    Deyou Chen and Chuanhong Gao. Chaos bound in Kerr-Newman-Taub-NUT black holes via circular motions. Chin. Phys. C, 47(1):015108, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Probing Thermodynamic Phase Transitions of 4D R- Charged Black Holes via Lyapunov Exponent

    Mozib Bin Awal and Prabwal Phukon. Probing Thermodynamic Phase Transitions of 4D R- Charged Black Holes via Lyapunov Exponent. 5 2025

    2025

  40. [48]

    Balbeer Singh, Nibedita Padhi, and Rashmi R. Nayak. Circular orbits and chaos bound in slow- rotating curved acoustic black holes. 5 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    Violation of bound on chaos for charged probe in Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole

    Bogeun Gwak, Naoto Kan, Bum-Hoon Lee, and Hocheol Lee. Violation of bound on chaos for charged probe in Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole. JHEP, 09:026, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Chaos bound of charged particles around phantom AdS black hole

    Yue Song, Rui Yin, Yiqian He, and Benrong Mu. Chaos bound of charged particles around phantom AdS black hole. 11 2022

    2022

  43. [51]

    Bound on Lyapunov exponent in Kerr-Newman-de Sitter black holes by a charged particle

    Junsu Park and Bogeun Gwak. Bound on Lyapunov exponent in Kerr-Newman-de Sitter black holes by a charged particle. JHEP, 04:023, 2024

    2024

  44. [52]

    Karthik R., Dillirajan D., K. M. Ajith, Kartheek Hegde, Shreyas Punacha, and A. Naveena Kumara. Euclidean Thermodynamics and Lyapunov Exponents of Einstein-Power-Yang-Mills AdS Black Holes. 4 2025

    2025

  45. [53]

    Effects of fluctuations in higher-dimensional AdS black holes

    Hyewon Han and Bogeun Gwak. Effects of fluctuations in higher-dimensional AdS black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 110(6):066013, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Stationary equilibrium of test particles near charged black branes with the hyperscaling violating factor

    Yu-Qi Lei and Xian-Hui Ge. Stationary equilibrium of test particles near charged black branes with the hyperscaling violating factor. Phys. Rev. D, 107(10):106002, 2023

    2023

  47. [55]

    Panigrahi, and Balbeer Singh

    Pinaki Dutta, Kamal L. Panigrahi, and Balbeer Singh. Circular string in a black p-brane leading to chaos. JHEP, 10:189, 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    Panigrahi, and Balbeer Singh

    Pinaki Dutta, Kamal L. Panigrahi, and Balbeer Singh. Chaos bound and its violation in black p-brane. JHEP, 02:043, 2025

    2025

  49. [57]

    G. W. Gibbons and Kei-ichi Maeda. Black Holes and Membranes in Higher Dimensional Theories with Dilaton Fields. Nucl. Phys. B, 298:741–775, 1988

    1988

  50. [58]

    Horowitz, and Andrew Strominger

    David Garfinkle, Gary T. Horowitz, and Andrew Strominger. Charged black holes in string theory. Phys. Rev. D, 43:3140, 1991. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 45, 3888 (1992)]

    1992

  51. [59]

    S. F. Hassan and Ashoke Sen. Twisting classical solutions in heterotic string theory. Nucl. Phys. B, 375:103–118, 1992

    1992

  52. [60]

    Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory

    Ashoke Sen. Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory. Phys. Rev. Lett., 69:1006–1009, 1992

    1992

  53. [61]

    Z. W. Chong, Mirjam Cvetic, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope. Charged rotating black holes in four- dimensional gauged and ungauged supergravities. Nucl. Phys. B, 717:246–271, 2005

    2005

  54. [62]

    David D. K. Chow and Geoffrey Comp` ere. Dyonic AdS black holes in maximal gauged super- gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 89(6):065003, 2014

    2014

  55. [63]

    Are ultraspinning Kerr-Sen- AdS 4 black holes always superentropic? Phys

    Di Wu, Puxun Wu, Hongwei Yu, and Shuang-Qing Wu. Are ultraspinning Kerr-Sen- AdS 4 black holes always superentropic? Phys. Rev. D, 102(4):044007, 2020

    2020

  56. [64]

    Ghosh, and Anzhong Wang

    Md Sabir Ali, Sushant G. Ghosh, and Anzhong Wang. Thermodynamics of Kerr-Sen-AdS black holes in the restricted phase space. Phys. Rev. D, 108(4):044045, 2023. 18

    2023

  57. [65]

    S. W. Hawking, C. J. Hunter, and Marika Taylor. Rotation and the AdS / CFT correspondence. Phys. Rev. D, 59:064005, 1999

    1999

  58. [66]

    Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture in Kerr-(Anti-)de Sitter Black Hole with Scalar Field

    Bogeun Gwak. Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture in Kerr-(Anti-)de Sitter Black Hole with Scalar Field. JHEP, 09:081, 2018

    2018

  59. [67]

    Weak cosmic censorship conjecture in Kerr-Newman-(anti-)de Sitter black hole with charged scalar field

    Bogeun Gwak. Weak cosmic censorship conjecture in Kerr-Newman-(anti-)de Sitter black hole with charged scalar field. JCAP, 10:012, 2021

    2021

  60. [68]

    Miranda, Emanuele Berti, Helvi Witek, and Vilson T

    Vitor Cardoso, Alex S. Miranda, Emanuele Berti, Helvi Witek, and Vilson T. Zanchin. Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes. Phys. Rev. D, 79(6):064016, 2009

    2009

  61. [69]

    Stability analysis and quasinormal modes of Reissner–Nordstrøm space- time via Lyapunov exponent

    Parthapratim Pradhan. Stability analysis and quasinormal modes of Reissner–Nordstrøm space- time via Lyapunov exponent. Pramana, 87(1):5, 2016

    2016

  62. [70]

    Lyapunov Exponent and Charged Myers Perry Spacetimes

    Partha Pratim Pradhan. Lyapunov Exponent and Charged Myers Perry Spacetimes. Eur. Phys. J. C, 73(6):2477, 2013

    2013

  63. [71]

    Circular Geodesics in Tidal Charged Black Hole

    Parthapratim Pradhan. Circular Geodesics in Tidal Charged Black Hole. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 15(01):1850011, 2017

    2017

  64. [72]

    Chaos of particle motion near a black hole with quasitopological electromagnetism

    Yu-Qi Lei, Xian-Hui Ge, and Cheng Ran. Chaos of particle motion near a black hole with quasitopological electromagnetism. Phys. Rev. D, 104(4):046020, 2021

    2021

  65. [73]

    Circular motion of charged particles near a charged black hole

    Yu-Qi Lei and Xian-Hui Ge. Circular motion of charged particles near a charged black hole. Phys. Rev. D, 105(8):084011, 2022

    2022

  66. [74]

    Lyapunov exponents as probes for a phase transi- tion of a Kerr-AdS black hole

    Deyou Chen, Chuang Yang, and Yongtao Liu. Lyapunov exponents as probes for a phase transi- tion of a Kerr-AdS black hole. Phys. Lett. B, 865:139463, 2025

    2025

  67. [75]

    Evaluation of circular geodesics and thermodynamics of a Bumblebee gravity-like black hole

    Riasat Ali, Terkaa Victor Targema, Xia Tiecheng, and Rimsha Babar. Evaluation of circular geodesics and thermodynamics of a Bumblebee gravity-like black hole. High Energy Dens. Phys., 55:101189, 2025. 19

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.