Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LAQuer: Localized Attribution Queries in Content-grounded Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.01187 v1 pith:SXX6R2EY submitted 2025-06-01 cs.CL

LAQuer: Localized Attribution Queries in Content-grounded Generation

classification cs.CL
keywords attributionlaquergenerationmethodstextexistingframeworklocalized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Grounded text generation models often produce content that deviates from their source material, requiring user verification to ensure accuracy. Existing attribution methods associate entire sentences with source documents, which can be overwhelming for users seeking to fact-check specific claims. In contrast, existing sub-sentence attribution methods may be more precise but fail to align with users' interests. In light of these limitations, we introduce Localized Attribution Queries (LAQuer), a new task that localizes selected spans of generated output to their corresponding source spans, allowing fine-grained and user-directed attribution. We compare two approaches for the LAQuer task, including prompting large language models (LLMs) and leveraging LLM internal representations. We then explore a modeling framework that extends existing attributed text generation methods to LAQuer. We evaluate this framework across two grounded text generation tasks: Multi-document Summarization (MDS) and Long-form Question Answering (LFQA). Our findings show that LAQuer methods significantly reduce the length of the attributed text. Our contributions include: (1) proposing the LAQuer task to enhance attribution usability, (2) suggesting a modeling framework and benchmarking multiple baselines, and (3) proposing a new evaluation setting to promote future research on localized attribution in content-grounded generation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Citation Failure: Definition, Analysis and Efficient Mitigation

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    The paper defines citation failure separately from response failure, introduces the CITECONTROL benchmark to analyze relational effects on citation quality, and proposes the CITENTION framework that integrates generat...

  2. MaxShapley: Towards Incentive-compatible Generative Search with Fair Context Attribution

    cs.LG 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MaxShapley computes fair document attributions in generative QA by reducing Shapley value calculation to polynomial time via a max-sum utility, matching exact Shapley quality on HotPotQA, MuSiQUE, and MS MARCO while u...